Defining trading partners for Order outbound scenario

We do have the scenario like:
We do receive the file from File (in house file, we can think it as some Positional file) and the receiver is going to receive the EDIFACT ORDERS file.
So far, we defined the trading partner setup is as follows:
Created two trading partners 1) host and 2) remote one
I guess we need to create two document definitions one for the receiving into TP (assuming custom way) and one is to send TP (EDIFACT). Pls confirm this part
We need to create two document definitions or only one? (We are using B2B as a reference to the ORDERS part outbound)
Presently we stuck here that unable to move forward.
Regards,
Naresh
Edited by: Naresh sharma on Jul 20, 2012 4:29 AM

Thanks Anuj for the guidance.
We are in dilemma of using the channel protocol for sending the documents to the remote trading partner.As we are in evaluation stage,we need your suggestion on selecting a channel protocol.Do you think AS2 can fulfill our requirement as we want that it can be implemented easily and sender side(such as AS2 server) can be set up easily. ( The flow is like :  Generic File (Host) TP -> AS2 ? (Remote TP)).
Thanking you in advance

Similar Messages

  • Define Field Selection - PM Order

    Hi,
    We have Order types PM01 and PM02, processing for Planning Plants 1000,2000, 3000 and 4000.
    Here for Planning Plant 1000,we have set up Equipment field, as mandatory for both Order type PM01 and PM02. This was set up through, Field Selection for Order Header Data, through Influencing Order type PM01 and PM02 and made Equipment as a mandatory field.
    As this influencing field as made as per Order type PM01 and PM02, for Equipment as mandatory this is applicable for all Plants 1000,2000, 3000 and 4000.
    Now we no need this Equipment as mandatory field in Order type PM01 and PM02 for Plant 4000. For only this requirement, can we make the influencing field for both Order type PM01 and PM02, for only Planning Plant 4000, not  Equipment as a mandatory field.
    This must not disturb the existing Equipment mandatory field for Order types PM01 and PM02 for other Plants 1000, 2000 and 3000.
    Kindly provide your suggestions.
    Raja.

    Kutti Raja,
    If you want to do this for all the order Types for Planning Plant 4000, you may achieve this by following Steps:
    1. Go to Field Selection for Order Header Data and Reference Object (Plant Maintenance and Customer Service --> Maintenance and Service Processing --> Maintenance and Service Orders --> Define Field Selection for Order Header Data (PM))
    2. Click on Influencing button and Double click on "Planning Plant".
    3. Enter "4000" in Contents Fields and Select Radio Button "Input" instead of "Required" next to Equipment field.
    For Rest of the Planning Plants Equipment will remain to be mandatory but for 4000 and all order Types, it will be an input field but not as Mandatory.
    Hope this helps.
    Chin2.

  • Getting error while processing EDIFACT-D96A-ORDERS.. Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND

    Hi Anuj & All,
        I'm trying to create an outbound scenario with EDIFACT-D96A-ORDERS. A simple SOA composite application polling data from DB and through B2B adapter 'send' option provides data to B2B system.
    Set up two partner profiles like this,
    Host:
    Name: HTP
    EDI Group ID: HTP
    EDI Interchange ID: Interchange Sen
    EDI Interchange ID Qualifier: 01
    Remote:
    Name: RTP
    EDI Group ID: RTP
    EDI Interchange ID: Interchange Rec
    EDI Interchange ID Qualifier: 01
    Other settings are as usual. Delivery channel of generic file created on RTH.
    Now, few documents settings on B2B console are like this,
    D96A-> Interchange tab
    Create UNA: Never
    ORDERS-> Transaction
    Functional Group Identifier Code: ORDERS
    Controlling Agency: UN
    - other properties are unchanged.
    On SOA side, the bpel invoke activity which calls B2B adapter has following properties:
    <invoke name="InvokeOrders"
      inputVariable="InvokeOrders_send_InputVariable"
      partnerLink="D96A.ORDERS" portType="ns2:send_ptt"
      operation="send" bpelx:invokeAsDetail="no">
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.toTradingPartnerIdType"
        expression="'NAME'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.toTradingPartnerId"
        expression="'RTP'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.messageType" expression="1"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.messageId" variable="messageID"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.fromTradingPartnerIdType"
        expression="'NAME'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.fromTradingPartnerId"
        expression="'HTP'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.documentTypeName"
        expression="'ORDERS'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.documentProtocolVersion"
        expression="'D96A'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.documentProtocolName"
        expression="'EDIFACT'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.documentDefinitionName"
        expression="'ORDERS_def'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.conversationId"
        variable="ConversationID"/>
    </invoke>
    The error I'm getting on B2B Console->Reports->Business Message, while running this is,
    Error Code B2B-50547
    Error Description Machine Info: (htp01310-vm01.htp.com) Description: Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND.
    Error Level ERROR_LEVEL_COLLABORATION
    Error Severity ERROR
    Error Text Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND.
    Note: On Manage Deployment Tab I've checked the agreement is in active state.
    -- Business Message (Result):--
    State: MSG_ERROR
    Document Type: ORDERS
    Agreement: <blank>
    Sender: HTP
    Receiver: <blank>
    -- Application Message (Result):--
    Sender Id Type: NAME
    Sender Value: TCS
    Receiver Id Type: NAME
    Receiver Value: ORCL
    Document Type: ORDERS
    Document Definition: ORDERS_def
    Document Protocol Name: EDIFACT
    Document Protocol Version: D96A
    Direction: OUTBOUND
    State: MSG_COMPLETE
    - Can anybody please shoot some pointer on how to resolve this? Please let me know if you need further configuration details which I've not mentioned here.
    Regards,
    - @bhijit

    Hi Mariusz,
        Thanks for your reply. Yes I think so, probably you're right. But finest trace level doesn't give much clues on "wrong mapped" data. Anyway, here is the detail log. Please don't forget to point out if you find something interesting.
    #### <Error> <oracle.soa.b2b.engine> <htp01310-vm01.htp.com> <soa_server1> <Workmanager: , Version: 0, Scheduled=false, Started=false, Wait time: 0 ms
    > <<anonymous>> <BEA1-0D3F5ABAC0B2E50C6CCB> <449b4b64fa2729cc:59737e36:146f08831ee:-8000-0000000000127da6> <1404379704092> <BEA-000000> <Error -:  B2B-50547:  Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND.
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.queryAgreementMO(RepoDataAccessor.java:887)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementDetails(RepoDataAccessor.java:415)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:465)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:224)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessageImpl(Engine.java:1555)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:819)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.outgoingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4100)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3921)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3309)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:637)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:214)
      at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
      at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:184)
      at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
    Error -:  B2B-50547:  Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND.
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.queryAgreementMO(RepoDataAccessor.java:887)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementDetails(RepoDataAccessor.java:415)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:465)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:224)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessageImpl(Engine.java:1555)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:819)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.outgoingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4100)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3921)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3309)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:637)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:214)
      at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
      at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:184)
      at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
    >
    #### <Error> <oracle.soa.b2b.engine> <htp01310-vm01.htp.com> <soa_server1> <Workmanager: , Version: 0, Scheduled=false, Started=false, Wait time: 0 ms
    > <<anonymous>> <BEA1-0D3F5ABAC0B2E50C6CCB> <449b4b64fa2729cc:59737e36:146f08831ee:-8000-0000000000127da6> <1404379704569> <BEA-000000> <Error -:  B2B-50547:  Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND.
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.queryAgreementMO(RepoDataAccessor.java:887)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementDetails(RepoDataAccessor.java:415)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:465)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:224)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessageImpl(Engine.java:1555)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:819)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.outgoingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4100)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3921)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3309)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:637)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:214)
      at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
      at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:184)
      at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
    Error -:  B2B-50547:  Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND.
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.queryAgreementMO(RepoDataAccessor.java:887)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementDetails(RepoDataAccessor.java:415)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:465)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:224)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessageImpl(Engine.java:1555)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:819)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.outgoingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4100)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3921)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3309)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:637)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:214)
      at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
      at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:184)
      at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
    >
    Rgds,
    - Abhijit
    P.S. - Can you please check what is the value of "Functional Group Identifier Code" for D96A ORDERS.

  • B2B-50547 Agreement not found for trading partners

    I am attempting to try out using a File listening channel. I have set up the channel with the file name format %TO_PARTY%_%DOCTYPE_NAME%_%DOCTYPE_REVISION%_%MSG_TYPE%_%MSG_ID% as shown in the Technical Note: 11g_002 File/ FTP capabilities. The folder is named as the from TP.
    I place the message into the From TP directory defined in the listening channel. The file is processed but I get B2B-50547 Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP ABC, ToTP XYZ with document type PAYMUL-D96A-INBOUND. If I don't have the file name format set for the listening channel the message is just treated as a wire message.
    The file name processed is XYZ_PAYMUL_D96A_1_MB12.xml
    The Document set up is
    EDI_EDIFACT
    D96A -- Document Protocol Version
         PAYMUL-- Document Type
    PAYMUL - Document Definition
    Both ABC and XYZ have PAYMUL set up as a document. There is an agreement against partner XYZ using the PAYMUL definition which has been validated and deployed.
    The xml file matches the xsd created from the ecs.
    Diagnostics is on and shows:
    fromTP : ABC
    toTP : XYZ
    DocumentProtocol : EDI_EDIFACT
    DocumentProtocolVersion : D96A
    DocumentType : PAYMUL
    Agreement : XYZ001
    MessageSize : 91688.0
    MessageState : ERROR
    FromEndpoint : null
    FromEndpointProtocol : null
    FromEndpointStatus : CONNECTED
    ToEndpoint : file://localhost/D:\XYZEDI
    ToEndpointProtocol : File
    ToEndpointStatus : CONNECTED
    Application : null
    Application : null
    Composite : null
    CompositeVersion : null
    Service/Reference : null
    the exception is shown in diagnostics as:
    <Exception xmlns="http://integration.oracle.com/B2B/Exception" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <correlationId>AC18139E137F05EE715000006438C1AF</correlationId>
    <b2bMessageId>MB12</b2bMessageId>
    <errorCode>B2B-50014</errorCode>
    <errorText>
    <![CDATA[General Error
      ]]>
    </errorText>
    <errorDescription>
    <![CDATA[Machine Info: (mbaguley-uk)
    Description: General Error
      ]]>
    </errorDescription>
    <errorSeverity>2</errorSeverity>
    <errorDetails>
         <parameter name="b2b.messageId" value="MB12"/>
         <parameter name="b2b.documentTypeName" value="PAYMUL"/>
         <parameter name="b2b.documentProtocolVersion" value="D96A"/>
         <parameter name="b2b.documentDefinitionName" value="PAYMUL"/>
         <parameter name="b2b.documentProtocolName" value="EDI_EDIFACT"/>
         <parameter name="b2b.messageType" value="1"/>
         <parameter name="b2b.fromTradingPartnerId" value="ABC"/>
         <parameter name="b2b.fromTradingPartnerIdType" value="Name"/>
         <parameter name="b2b.toTradingPartnerId" value="XYZ"/>
         <parameter name="b2b.toTradingPartnerIdType" value="Name"/>
    </errorDetails>
    </Exception>
    I must be missing a simple point or set up here so would appreciate any guidance.
    Thanks

    Both ABC and XYZ have PAYMUL set up as a document. There is an agreement against partner XYZ using the PAYMUL definition which has been validated and deployed.I think you have created an outbound agreement (ABC sending message to XYZ). If that is the case then go to Channel Attributes of your File listening channel and select the Internal checkbox. save the configuration of channel and run a test again.
    Regards,
    Anuj

  • Authorized Partners for Release Orders with customer hierarchy

    Hello everyone,
          I have created a value contract with order type WK1, in the order type WK1 configuration, choose rule B  for check partner auth. field, namely we want to use
    customer hierarchy to detemine the sold-to-party for the follow-up release order. Also I have created the customer hierarchy with hierarchy type A. There are
    four levels under this hierarchy, it contains four customer nodes and four customers. Every customer is belong to a customer node. The partner determination
    for the customer hierarchy have alredy done, I can see the customer hierarchy "1D" at the partner tab of header in the contract, but when I release the sales
    order against  the contract, input a low-level customer number, still got the message "partner X is not authorized to release from contracts.".
         I want to know if I missed some settings in order type configuration or the copy control from WK1 to OR. If this scenario need integrate with  CRM system?  I
    have found some related information, just list below:
        Partners in the hierarchy (Rule B)
    If the partner who wants to release against the contract is the sold-to party of the contract or at a lower level in customer hierarchy to the sold-to party in the contract, the system accepts the partner as the sold-to party for the release order.
    If rule B is defined for the contract type, you can search for authorized partners for a release order using the contract number. Equally, you can search for the relevant contract for a release order using the partner number. In this case, the partner authorization rule is irrelevant.
    Prerequisites
    If you wish to use group hierarchies other than pricing hierarchies to determine authorized partners, you must have created a hierarchy category and a hierarchy:
    To create the hierarchy category, go to Customizing for CRM under Master Data --> Business Partner-->  Business Partner Group Hierarchy. 
    To create the group hierarchy, go to the SAP Easy Access Menu and choose Master Data --> Business Partners --> Maintain Group Hierarchy.
    Note that you can only create group hierarchies in the SAP GUI and not in the People-Centric user interface.
    You must have activated the necessary settings for the sales contract and the release order in the IMG for CRM. For more information, see Transactions ---> Settings for Contracts -->Define Settings for Authorized Partners.
      Thanks!

    Hi,
    In transcation VTAA at item level have your own cory requirment code which will calcullate net value of the doc, hope this works out
    regards
    sriky

  • After upgrade to 11.1.1.2 Agreement not found for trading partners

    We just upgraded from 11.1.1.1 to 11.1.1.2 and an existing composite that sends a file from Oracle EBS to an outside trading partner is not working.
    We tried importing the Agreement from the 11.1.1.2 and when it did not work, we purged the repository and started from scratch.
    The error we are getting is:
    Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP Rheem, ToTP JPMorgan with document type JPPositivePay-1-OUTBOUND
    This is a file that we are sending from Oracle EBS to an outside trading partner via FTP.
    One thing we are noticing is that when we create the agreement, it does not show up under our host TP, it only shows up under the target TP.
    We have set up the TP, Channel, and agreements exactly like they are set in the 11.1.1.1 environment.
    Here is the log file in debug mode.
    [2010-06-17T07:40:10.471-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@b9d2338] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_2GB8yFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000E8,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [SRC_METHOD: synchedLog_J] oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException notifying App
    [2010-06-17T07:40:10.471-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@b9d2338] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_2GB8yFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000E8,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [SRC_METHOD: synchedLog_J] Notification: notifyApp: Enter
    [2010-06-17T07:40:10.479-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@b9d2338] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_2GB8yFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000E8,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [SRC_METHOD: synchedLog_J] Notification: notifyApp: payload = <Exception xmlns="http://integration.oracle.com/B2B/Exception" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">[[
    <correlationId>7F00000112945B5769F00000AEC3D2E0</correlationId>
    <b2bMessageId>10011</b2bMessageId>
    <errorCode>B2B-50547</errorCode>
    <errorText>
    <![CDATA[Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP Rheem, ToTP JPMorgan with document type JPPositivePay-1-OUTBOUND.
      ]]>
    </errorText>
    <errorDescription>
    <![CDATA[Machine Info: (afsmlnx04.rheem.com)
    Description: Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP Rheem, ToTP JPMorgan with document type JPPositivePay-1-OUTBOUND.
      ]]>
    </errorDescription>
    <errorSeverity>2</errorSeverity>
    </Exception>
    [2010-06-17T07:40:10.486-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@b9d2338] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_2GB8yFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000E8,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [SRC_METHOD: synchedLog_J] Notification: notifyApp: Enqueue the exception message:[[
    <Exception xmlns="http://integration.oracle.com/B2B/Exception" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <correlationId>7F00000112945B5769F00000AEC3D2E0</correlationId>
    <b2bMessageId>10011</b2bMessageId>
    <errorCode>B2B-50547</errorCode>
    <errorText>
    <![CDATA[Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP Rheem, ToTP JPMorgan with document type JPPositivePay-1-OUTBOUND.
      ]]>
    </errorText>
    <errorDescription>
    <![CDATA[Machine Info: (afsmlnx04.rheem.com)
    Description: Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP Rheem, ToTP JPMorgan with document type JPPositivePay-1-OUTBOUND.
      ]]>
    </errorDescription>
    <errorSeverity>2</errorSeverity>
    </Exception>
    [2010-06-17T07:40:10.492-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@b9d2338] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_2GB8yFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000E8,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [SRC_METHOD: synchedLog_J] Notification: deliverException: Send message to endpoint IP_IN_QUEUE
    [2010-06-17T07:40:10.492-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE:32] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@b9d2338] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_2GB8yFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000E8,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [SRC_METHOD: log] URL ===== aq://IP_IN_QUEUE@jdbc/SOADataSource
    [2010-06-17T07:40:10.514-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@b9d2338] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_2GB8yFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000E8,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [SRC_METHOD: synchedLog_J] oracle.tip.b2b.transport.AppTransportInterface:send TO Endpoint: 509 aq://IP_IN_QUEUE@jdbc/SOADataSource
    [2010-06-17T07:40:10.522-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.transport] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@b9d2338] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_2GB8yFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000E8,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.transport.basic.TransportLogger] [APP: soa-infra] [SRC_METHOD: log] TransportProperties.TransportProperties():internal=true;aq.sender.queue_name=IP_IN_QUEUE;aq.sender.datasource=jdbc/SOADataSource;aq.sender.queue_payload_col=PAYLOAD;aq.sender.recipients=b2berroruser;
    [2010-06-17T07:40:11.356-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@b9d2338] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_2GB8yFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000E8,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [SRC_METHOD: synchedLog_J] oracle.tip.b2b.transport.AppTransportInterface:send Message Successfully Transmitted
    [2010-06-17T07:40:11.377-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@b9d2338] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_2GB8yFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000E8,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [SRC_METHOD: synchedLog_J] oracle.tip.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler:findInvocationContext trying doc ref
    [2010-06-17T07:40:11.396-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@b9d2338] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_2GB8yFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000E8,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [SRC_METHOD: synchedLog_J] Notification: notifyApp: Exit
    [2010-06-17T07:40:11.396-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@b9d2338] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_2GB8yFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000E8,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [SRC_METHOD: synchedLog_J] oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException Updated the Error Message Successfully: Error -: B2B-50547: Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP Rheem, ToTP JPMorgan with document type JPPositivePay-1-OUTBOUND.
    [2010-06-17T07:40:11.397-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE:32] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@b9d2338] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_2GB8yFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000E8,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [SRC_METHOD: log] class oracle.tip.b2b.metric.B2BMessageProperties[[
    fromTP : Rheem
    toTP : JPMorgan
    DocumentProtocol : null
    DocumentProtocolVersion : null
    DocumentType : JPPositivePay
    Agreement : null
    MessageSize : 0.0
    MessageState : ERROR
    FromEndpoint : null
    FromEndpointProtocol : null
    FromEndpointStatus : null
    ToEndpoint : null
    ToEndpointProtocol : null
    ToEndpointStatus : null
    Application : null
    Application : null
    Composite : null
    CompositeVersion : null
    Service/Reference : null
    ]]

    In another thread Nitesh states:
    b2b.documentProtocolVersion is missing in your properties and b2b.toTradingPartnerId is not set properly.
    Below are the property, you should set in composite:
    b2b.documentTypeName = <doctype>
    b2b.documentProtocolVersion = <docRevision>
    b2b.fromTradingPartnerId = <HostTPName>
    b2b.toTradingPartnerId = <RemoteTPName>
    b2b.messageType = <msgType>
    If you want to identify TP based on Identifier then use below for TP:
    b2b.toTradingPartnerId = <AS2 Identifier Value>
    b2b.toTradingPartnerIdType = <AS2 Identifier>
    We are setting the b2b.documentProtocolVersion variable in BPEL:
    [2010-06-17T07:40:05.294-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE:32] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: orabpel.invoke.pool-3.thread-11] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_5hM0hFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000GQ,0:1:100000028] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [composite_name: RHMAPPositivePayService] [component_name: enquedat] [component_instance_id: 10011] [SRC_METHOD: log] [composite_instance_id: 10011] class oracle.integration.platform.blocks.b2b.B2BReference : oracle.integration.platform.blocks.b2b.B2BReference@8fdf1b3 : Key : b2b.documentProtocolVersion
    [2010-06-17T07:40:05.294-04:00] [soa_server1] [TRACE:32] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: orabpel.invoke.pool-3.thread-11] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000I_5hM0hFw000jzwkno1C6FTd0000GQ,0:1:100000028] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.tip.b2b.system.DiagnosticService] [APP: soa-infra] [composite_name: RHMAPPositivePayService] [component_name: enquedat] [component_instance_id: 10011] [SRC_METHOD: log] [composite_instance_id: 10011] class oracle.integration.platform.blocks.b2b.B2BReference : oracle.integration.platform.blocks.b2b.B2BReference@8fdf1b3 : Value : 1
    Edited by: robn77 on Jun 17, 2010 5:27 AM

  • Agreement not found for trading partners:FromTP HostParty, ToTP RemoteParty

    Hi,
    I have setup host partner and trading partner by importing CPA. I am trying to generate outbound message on Listening Channel(JMS_OUT_Queue). I am using custom Java Implementation relying on weblogic client jar to produce messages on this JMS_OUT_Queue.
    My Messages are properly produced by java application and consumed by Oracle B2B. but they all fail as agreement could not be found.
    Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HostParty, ToTP RemoteParty with document type ACTION:action1 Service:service1 ServiceTypestring-OUTBOUND.
    I am setting below JMS Header properties.
    1.FromRole
    2.ToRole
    3.FROM_PARTY_ID_TYPE
    4.TO_PARTY_ID_TYPE
    5.SERVICE
    6.ACTION
    7.FROM_PARTY
    8.TO_PARTY
    9.SERVICETYPE
    I have tried lot of permutations and combinations with JMS Header properties, no matter what I do, Agreement is not picked up and message fails.

    Thanks Anuj. I made it work by passing document version and id as JMS headers.
    Earlier I was setting action header as "ACTION=action1", I will try by modifying it as "ACTION_NAME=ACTION:action1".
    *<UPDATE>: I tried it, still not working.*
    Error: Machine Info: (apl08316uaapp01) Description: Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HostParty, ToTP RemoteParty with document type ACTION:rsProcessLineAvailabilityRequest Service:bcRequestLineAvailabilityv14 ServiceTypestring-OUTBOUND.
    JMS Header:
    JMSXDeliveryCount=1, MSG_ID=ID:<457648.1369731952449.0>, FROM_PARTY_ID_TYPE=urn:oasis:names:tc:ebXML-cppa:partyid-type:duns, Sequencing=false, ACTION_NAME=ACTION:rsProcessLineAvailabilityRequest;SERVICE:bcRequestLineAvailabilityv14;SERVICETYPE:string, FROM_PARTY=DUNS_ID_OF_HP, TO_PARTY_ID_TYPE=urn:oasis:names:tc:ebXML-cppa:partyid-type:duns, TO_PARTY=DUNS_ID_OF_TP
    regards,
    Ashay T.
    Edited to Remove Organization Specific Info

  • AIF Value mapping for outbound scenario

    Hello All,
    Is there any possibility of using same value mapping which is defined for Inbound scenario can be reused for outbound scenario as well ?
    Since, AIF value mapping can be defined based on Sending system but there is no option of creating value mapping pair between sending system and receiving system (similar to SAP PI value mapping) , is it only defined to use for Inbound scenarios ?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Dijesh Tanna

    Michael
    -->>>>you cannot have the same target value for two source values ?
    What does this mean? Can't we have If name =  A1, then value in the target should be  Sales consultant
    and if name =  A2 then value in the target should be  sales consultant?
    My question was :
    If name = A1, then value in the target should be  sales consultant
    If surname = A1, then value in the target should be purchase consultant
    In the same graphical message mapping, can this be achieved using value mapping?
    Thanks

  • Order Reason ABC not defined for Order Type Retrun order

    Hi
    I am getting following " Message no. V1 899 " when i am  doing return order without refernce .
    Order reason is defined in customization but still we are getting the following message " Message no. V1 899 " /Order Reason E18 not defined for Order Type ZEF9.
    Can any one help me
    regards,
    kiran

    Hi Kiran
    As you have created sales order with document type ZEF9 but you have not taken any reference document then go to VOV8 and select ZEF9 and maintain  the order reason feild and then do the process
    Regards
    Srinath

  • ES bundle scenario for Order to cash

    Hi Experts,
    I have to perform a scenario of ES bundles for Order to cash in PI.
    Please provide me the pre-requisites to perform this scenario.
    Also an approach to perform this scenario (Links to weblogs or articles if any are highly appreciated)
    Regards,
    Saravanan

    You have to first go through the Enterprise Services for this process. Search for your ES Workplace and open the specific service. Then you understand which SWCV would be required to use this service. These SWCV has to be imported in PI And ECC. And thats it for the standard configuration. For modifications to standard process, you might have to implement some BADI.
    https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ESpackages/OrdertoCashEnterpriseServices
    Regards,
    Prateek Raj Srivastava

  • Define access sequence for purchase order

    Hi,
    Please can I get some advice on how to create an access sequence in MM (in IMG = define access sequence for purchase order)
    I have created a condition type for handling costs and want to assign a default value for each individual goods supplier.
    So for plant 1000 and goods supplier 40, assign a rate of 3% to the condition. For plant 1000 and goods supplier 50, assign a rate of 7% etc etc
    How do I go about doing this please
    Thank you

    hi,
    Steps,
    Customizing activities:
    1) Create the condition table for vendor and plant field.
    table no should be above 500 as its a customizing.
    2) create access sequence and assign the condition table to this access sequence.And activate the fields in table.
    3) create Z condition type and put this access sequence into the condition type.
    End user activities:
    4) maitain the condition record based on vendor and plant in MEK1 transaction
    regards,
    sujit

  • DLFL for Prod Orders - ATO Scenario

    Hi Experts,
    Basically im an Finance guy. I am facing difficulty in setting up DLFL status for order types of ATO scenario. We have the typical scenario of creation of sales order, triggiring planned order and converted to production order, and the goods are delivered to customer and the invoice is booked. All the costs relevant are settled to the production order and not to the sales order. At month end we run wip, variance and then settle the orders and close down the orders.
    When i try to set DLFL through CO02, the deletion flag active indicator is greyed out, i tried other alternative of CO78, the orders are not picking at all. Im not sure how to handle this scenario.
    When i spoke to PP consultant, they say for these order types when there is a link between sales order and production order, the DLFL cant be set in CO02 or CO78, meaning not in production order. It seems the flag as to be set in sales order where the production order is linked. But i dont see any provision in sales order of setting the DLFL flag. They also said, its because of the costs settled to production order.
    Im not sure, is this the way SAP is desinged or is there any other alternative.
    Has anybody come across this scenario, please help me out. How to handle in these scenarios?
    Thanks in advance.
    abhi

    Hi,
    Yes, as said by your PP Consultant, this is how the SAP is designed for ATO Scenario.
    For further clarification refer below OSS Notes.
    325742
    447072
    171680
    317203
    Hope this helps..
    Regards,
    Siva

  • Plant as Vendor Defination and Assignment, for Stock Transport Order.

    Hallow All,
    Can anybody explain the procedure of  Plant as Vendor defination and their assignment for the Stock transfer with Stock Transport Order.
    Thanks in advance !!!!!!

    hi
    Following are the steps:
    1.Create a vendor for the company code of receiving plant, using account group :0007 using T-Code XK01.
    2 Assign this vendor to Delivering plant
    Go to XK02 >Purchasing view>Extras>Add. Purchasing data>Plant
    3. Create internal customer with the sales area of the vendor. Go To XD01
    4.In Pricing procedure determination relevant to STO, assign document Pricing Procedure and customer pricing procedure appropriate for STO to get the pricing in the invoice.
    5.Maintain condition records for the relevant pricing condition.
    6. Some more setting for STO: Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO> define shipping data for plants > Go to Receiving plant >assign customer here & Supplying SA (for billing) to Receiving plant here
    7. Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO> define shipping data for plants > Go to Supplying plant and assign the sales area of receiving plant.
    8. Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO> assign delivery Type & Checking rule
    Assign the delivery type to document type. In this case, Delivery type NLCC is assigned to Document type NB
    9. Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO>Assign document Type, One step Procedure, Under delivery tolerance
    Assign the document type NB to supplying plant and receiving plant
    10. After all settings , Create the STO using T-Code:ME21n and Save.
    11. Create Delivery :VL10G
    Click on the Background Button after selecting line item
    A message is flashed : See log for information> next Click on Log for delivery creation Button >click on line item>click on document button to get Delivery document No
    12. Picking, PGI:[VL02n
    13. Billing:VF01n
    Save the document and its done
    try this
    reward points if heilpful

  • FM for create outbound delivery with order reference

    Hi,
      Can u pls tell me the function module name for create outbound delivery with order reference.
    regards,
    Mahi.

    Hi,
    You can use the BAPI BAPI_DELIVERYPROCESSING_EXEC
    Check this sample code..
    PARAMETERS: p_vbeln LIKE vbak-vbeln.
    DATA: BEGIN OF t_vbap OCCURS 0,
            vbeln LIKE vbap-vbeln,
            posnr LIKE vbap-posnr,
            kwmeng LIKE vbap-kwmeng,
            matnr  LIKE vbap-matnr,
            werks  LIKE vbap-werks,
          END OF t_vbap.
    DATA: t_request TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF bapideliciousrequest
          WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: t_created TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF bapideliciouscreateditems
          WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: t_return TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF bapiret2 WITH HEADER LINE.
    SELECT vbeln posnr kwmeng matnr werks
           INTO TABLE t_vbap
           FROM vbap
           WHERE vbeln = p_vbeln.
    LOOP AT t_vbap.
      t_request-document_numb = t_vbap-vbeln.
      t_request-document_item = t_vbap-posnr.
      t_request-quantity_sales_uom = t_vbap-kwmeng.
      t_request-id = 1.
      t_request-document_type = 'A'.
      t_request-delivery_date      = sy-datum.
      t_request-material = t_vbap-matnr.
      t_request-plant = t_vbap-werks.
      t_request-date = sy-datum.
      t_request-goods_issue_date = sy-datum.
      t_request-goods_issue_time = sy-uzeit.
      APPEND t_request.
    ENDLOOP.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_DELIVERYPROCESSING_EXEC'
      TABLES
        request               = t_request
        createditems          = t_created
        return                = t_return
    READ TABLE t_return WITH KEY type = 'E'.
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
      MESSAGE e208(00) WITH 'Delivery creation error'.
    ENDIF.
    COMMIT WORK.
    READ TABLE t_created INDEX 1.
    Write: /  t_created-document_numb.
    Thanks
    Naren

  • Where can I define Account assignment category for order settlement rules

    Dear Gurus,
        When I used Tcode: CO07 to create a rework order for parent order. But I cann't find the Account assignment category = Ord (Order) in the maintain Settlement rule overview.
      Where can I define Account assignment category for order settlement rules?
      Please help me. Thanks!
    Regards
    Paul.

    I've resolved this question.
        Firstly, run OPJH - Define Order Types, we should assign settlement profile for the order type.
        Secondly, Run OKO7-Maintain Settlement Profile, find and mailtain the settlement profile. In 'Valid Receivers' we should set the field 'Order' = 1-(Settlement Optional).
        Thirdly, run CO07 - Create Order without material. We can find account assignment catetory 'ORD' in maintaining Settlement rule.
    Edited by: Paul Chan on Feb 16, 2009 5:15 AM

Maybe you are looking for