Delaying billing based on POD receipt

Hi
Is anyone aware of the SAP best practice for enabling a delay in billing after POD receipt. This would be an international direct shipping scenario.
Thanks
Proof of delivery (POD) is an instrument involved in business processes in which an invoice is issued only after the customer has confirmed the delivery's arrival. In addition to the proof of delivery itself, you can also record the POD date, POD time, the actual quantity that arrived and the reason for possible differences in quantities. This is especially important for deliveries where the delivery quantity varies because of the nature of the goods or for which the exact delivery quantity is unknown from the start. You are now in a position to issue an accurate invoice based on the customer's confirmation of goods received. You no longer need to create credit memos. The reasons for deviation that occur most frequently in "real world" scenarios such as stock shrinkage, theft, certain characteristics of goods (volatility, for example), and transportation damage are recorded and analyzed in the system. This analysis is especially valuable when you are negotiating with forwarding agents, vendors, or customers, since all deviations can be reflected.

Bill, this is standard SAP. You will have to do 2 things to activate this SAP POD functionality:
- activate POD relevancy in the ship-to customer master (sales view, shipping tab)
- activate POD relevancy for the delivery item categories in customizing.
The Standard routine of copying requirements 003 - header/dl related in VOFM-> Copying Requirements -> Billing is the one that does not allow creation of invoice if POD confirmation is not received.

Similar Messages

  • Standard capability to delay billing based on POD receipt

    Hello,
    Is anyone know is an SAP standard capability to delay billing based on POD receipt?
    Thanks

    Bill, this is standard SAP. You will have to do 2 things to activate this SAP POD functionality:
    - activate POD relevancy in the ship-to customer master (sales view, shipping tab)
    - activate POD relevancy for the delivery item categories in customizing.
    The Standard routine of copying requirements 003 - header/dl related in VOFM-> Copying Requirements -> Billing is the one that does not allow creation of invoice if POD confirmation is not received.

  • For third-party order related billing based on GR

    Hi Gurus,
    I have special requirement.
    In third party Processing we want to do statistical goods Goods Receipt.
    generally we do billing based on the setting in Item category TAS billing relevance "F" So system will allow billing once we do MIRO.
    Now i want to Do billing based on GRN.. is there any way for that????
    I tried with the option "G" . but it is not working. Is there any Settings i need to in Copy controls.?????
         Not relevant for billing
    A     Delivery-related billing document
    B     Relevant for order-related billing - status acc.to order qty
    C     Relevant for ord.-related billing - status acc.to target qty
    D     Relevant for pro forma
    *F     Order-related billing doc. - status according to invoice qty*
    G     Order-related billing of the delivery quantity
    H     Delivery-related billing - no zero quantities
    I     Order-relevant billing - billing plan
    J     Relevant for deliveries across EU countries
    K     Delivery-related invoices for partial quantity
    L     Pro forma - no zero quantities
    M     Delivery-related invoices-no zero qtys (incl main batch itm)
    N     Pro forma - no zero quantities (including main batch items)
    P     Delivery-related invoices for CSFG - No batch split items
    Q     Delivery-related invoices for CRM
    R     Delivery-related invoices for CRM - No zero quantities
    S     IBS-DI: Order-Related Bill. Doc. with DP w/o Billing Plan
    T     Delivery-related CRM billing with IC billing in CRM
    U     Deliv.-rel. CRM billing w. IC billing in CRM - no zero qties
    your immediate Reply will be highly appreciated .
    Thanks
    Pradeep

    Hi
    You can make the control setting as to whether the invoice receipt quantity or the goods receipt quantity should be relevant for billing in the copy control for billing on the item level in the billing quantity field.
    In Customizing, choose Sales and Distribution -> Billing -> Billing documents -> Maintain Copying Control for Billing Documents -> Copying Control: Delivery to Billing Document -> Item, then select an item category.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Invoice Date Based on POD Date and Requested Delivery Date

    Hello Experts,
    Could you please Help me How to get the Billing date in the invoice document based on POD date if the POD Report has been Posted , If not the system should pick up the requested delivery date.
    Thanks for your time

    Hi,
    Create an copy control routine (T.Code VOFM) as assign in copy control setting between Delivery doc to billing docuement (T.code VTFL).
    The new routine will be created with copy of existing routine assign under "Copying requirements" at item level, and assign on same place.
    Pl take help of ABAPer to write the new routine.
    regards
    Vivek.
    Edited by: Vievk Vardhan on Jan 7, 2010 1:50 PM

  • Batch search strategy based on goods receipt date

    Hello,
    Can some one help me with setting up Batch search strategy based on goods receipt date currently is on batch number.
    Thanks a lot
    Thanks!
    Best Regards
    Srw

    Hi
    If you want to set up Batch search strategy based on goods receipt date......then you have to create GR Date as one charecteristics in T.Code: CT04 and assign this charecter in Class with respect to class type  023
    Then assign this class in Material Master Classification view..
    Make sure in Material master, Purchasing view...you have activated Batch management active check box....
    Then when ever you do GR in MIGO, In batch tab, In classification field maintain the GR Date..
    Then Create sort sequence in  T.Code: CU70 and you can maintain in what basis ie)in assending or desending GR Date you have to search the batch..
    And then Create Batch Search Statergy in MBC1 and there you assign the sort sequence in Details...
    Now  you do your regular procedings.....the material Batch will be searched based on GR Date...
    Reward if useful
    Regards
    S.Baskaran

  • Goods Issue based on Goods receipt.

    Hello,
    Can any body suggest query on "Goods Issue based on Goods receipt."
    Scenario :
    Suppose P.O has been created @10/- for 100 Quantity . GR has done for 100/-in Month of June, now another P.O has created @12/-  for 100 Quantity in Month of July  and GR done for the same , I want to Isuue Goods in Month of july and expect system should take price of @10/- for first 100 Quantity and @12/- for the rest quantity.
    Could you advise.?
    Thanks & Regards
    Sudhansu

    Hi,
    For FIFO Configuration,
    1. Ensure FIFO is active tcode OMWE
    2. FIFO maintained at company code or plant level T code: MRLH
    3. Movement type settings for FIFO T code OMW4
    4. Preparation of FIFO in MMR T code: MRF4
    5. Run the FIFO valuation T code MRF1

  • Billing based on Position Payer  (re-posted again)

    Hello,
    Let me explain my doubt.
    Our customer, the way of working, after creating sales order with documents flow, is modify de Payer at position level and later create again the Proforma billing, and the final billing.
    This crash with the standard way of billing, for example:
    Sales order A
    Header payer: n1
    10 Position payer: n1
    20 Position payer: n3
    30 Position payer: n1
    Sales order B
    Header payer: n2
    10 Position payer: n2
    20 Position payer: n3
    30 Position payer: n2
    Final billing by standard:
    Billing number 1: against payer n1 (OK)
    Billing number 2: against payer n2 (OK)
    The problem is against payer n3, system generate 2 differents billing documents instead of one per the same payer.
    Is it posible on VTFA- Billing based upon Order, item level 'Data VBRK/VBRP' , create a routine with a ZUKRI in order to billing by positions payers??
    Another solution, on VOPA,delete PY for header billing partner procedure and add PY to position billing partner procedure?
    I would be pleased if you can help us?
    I have created this 9XX rutine and now system is splitting by WE instead of RG:
    DATA: BEGIN OF ZUK,
    MODUL(3) VALUE '902',
    VBELN LIKE VBPA-VBELN,
    POSNR LIKE VBPA-POSNR,
    PARVW LIKE VBPA-PARVW,
    END OF ZUK.
    ZUK-VBELN = VBPA-VBELN.
    ZUK-POSNR = VBPA-POSNR.
    ZUK-PARVW = VBPA-PARVW.
    VBRK-ZUKRI = ZUK.
    Any idea
    Thanks in advance

    Hello,
    I have created this new routine and now system is splitting by WE instead of RG:
    DATA: BEGIN OF ZUK,
              MODUL(3) VALUE '902',
              VBELN LIKE VBPA-VBELN,
              POSNR LIKE VBPA-POSNR,
              PARVW LIKE VBPA-PARVW,
            END OF ZUK.
      ZUK-VBELN = VBPA-VBELN.
      ZUK-POSNR = VBPA-POSNR.
      ZUK-PARVW = VBPA-PARVW.
      VBRK-ZUKRI = ZUK.
    Any idea?

  • Billing based on Position Payer

    Hello,
    Let me explain my doubt.
    Our customer, the way of working, after creating sales order with documents flow, is modify de Payer at position level and later create again the Proforma billing, and the final billing.
    This crash with the standard way of billing, for example:
    Sales order A
    Header payer: n1
    10 Position payer: n1
    20 Position payer: n3
    30 Position payer: n1
    Sales order B
    Header payer: n2
    10 Position payer: n2
    20 Position payer: n3
    30 Position payer: n2
    Final billing by standard:
    Billing number 1: against payer n1 (OK)
    Billing number 2: against payer n2 (OK)
    The problem is against payer n3, system generate 2 differents billing documents instead of one per the same payer.
    Is it posible on VTFA- Billing based upon Order, item level 'Data VBRK/VBRP' , create a routine with a ZUKRI in order to billing by positions payers??
    Another solution, on VOPA,delete PY for header billing partner procedure  and add PY to position billing partner procedure?
    I would be pleased if you can help us?
    Thanks in advance

    Hello,
    I have created this new routine and now system is splitting by WE instead of RG:
    DATA: BEGIN OF ZUK,
              MODUL(3) VALUE '902',
              VBELN LIKE VBPA-VBELN,
              POSNR LIKE VBPA-POSNR,
              PARVW LIKE VBPA-PARVW,
            END OF ZUK.
      ZUK-VBELN = VBPA-VBELN.
      ZUK-POSNR = VBPA-POSNR.
      ZUK-PARVW = VBPA-PARVW.
      VBRK-ZUKRI = ZUK.
    Any idea?

  • Intercompany billing RD04 with goods-receipt-based invoice verification

    Hi members,
    we think about making use of the automated intercompany billing functionality with the RD04.
    In our logistic processes we apply the goods-receipt-based invoice verification. This is a very important requirement. That means that invoices can be only posted if the goods receipt has taken place.
    Is there a possibility to configure the automated intercompany billing so that this requirement is met?
    Any ideas? Any documents? Helpful links?
    Thank`s in advance.
    Best regards.

    Hi Imer,
    I believe you must be following any one of below process steps for Inter company Billing:
    Sales Order
    Delivery
    Customer Invoice
    Inter-company Invoice
    Or
    Inter company STO
    Delivery
    Invoice
    GR Based on Inter Company STO
    Automatic Vendor Posting (RD04)
    If you are following first process then no need for GR at all.
    If it is second process then assign Requirement Routine (Logic: Check GR has been completed or not for STO, if completed Pass the requirement else fail. take MM consultant's help for exact table and field details if needed.)
    Change the RD04 trigger based on Background Job processing and Run Background job for processing of the Output type.
    Regards,
    MJ.

  • Billing date based in POD

    Hi everybody!
    I have 2 situations:
    - Payer without Invoicing dates: when i create the Billing Document, the real billing date is the same as the Requested Delivey Date (in the sales order).
    - Payer with Invoicing Dates (365 days a year): when i create the Billing Document the real Billing Date is the same as the POD.
    Where can i check how this work?
    Regards!

    Any user exit where i could check?
    Regards!

  • Intercompany Invoice Based on Goods Receipt

    Hello,
    I am running the following intercompany scenario : Purchase order - replenishment delivery - internal billing document.
    - Ordering organization : Cpy A / Sales org A / Plant A
    - Supplying organization : Cpy B / Sales org B / Plant B
    Standard SAP issues an invoice based on the goods issue, which makes perfect sense.  My client's requirement is to trigger the intercompany invoice from the goods receipt at Plant A.

    Hi
    Please check the VTFL Copy control settings.In VTFL check  Data VBRK/VBRP routine feild.For your requirement you may have to change the subroutine
    If standard subroutines are not meeting your requirement,you may have to add new logic to the subroutine with the help of your ABAP team.
    Regards
    Srinath

  • GR- Based IV - Goods receipt-based Invoice verification

    Hi,
    I am trying to make a new purchase order type all equal to the standart type. I only want an exception: the GR-based IV indicator must be, by default, off.
    This indicator specifies that prevision has been made for goods -receipt base invoice verification.
    So the goal is to have two kinds of purchase orders with a default GR-base IV indicator.
                              Best Regards
                                     João Fernandes

    Hi Kore,
    I forget to tell you one thing...in order to use the master record i must to change the info record...but i have to many materials...
    Do you know some mean of clean de info record of all materials of a vendor?
                 Best Regards
                        João Fernandes

  • Milestone Billing based on Percentage & Quantity

    Hi,
    Can you please guide how to map the following scenario
    I have Business Scenario in Milestone Billing.
    The Milestone terms are assigned in CJ20N and the same is copies to
    sales order. The Milestone terms defined in the Project are
    50% Advance Payment
    40% Agaisnt Supply (Treating this also as advance)
    10% At the time of Installation.(Treat this also as advance)
    50% Revenue Realisation
    50% Revenue Realisation
    Order quantity is 100RMT
    Order Value 10000
    The definition of the each milestone is as follows -
    Advance Payment: This Milestone raised at the time of booking of sales
    order for Advance Payment. Unless advance is receivd orders are not
    execute in the business. It means 50% of 10000 = 5000
    40% Agaisnt Supply : This Milestone is raised based on supply of
    material to the customer. It means as of Milestone Billing Date if
    material dispatched is 20MT then the Milestone Billing Booked in the
    system is 10000*40% *20/100= 800 (treat this also as advance payment
    and client called it as Running Bill) and the same way book the billing
    in the system upto completion of 100RMT.
    At the time of Installation: This Milestone is raised when the
    Installation process is starts. It mean example, if finish the
    Installation of 10RMT, then the Milestone Billing is raised as per
    below formula - 1000010%10/100 =100 (Treat this also as Advance
    Payment and call it as Running Bill).
    Actual revenue is booked in the system, once receive the completion
    certificate from the client.
    As of now in the system, only accept the value base or percentage base
    milestones in the system. This type of above scenario how to map in
    the system, can please propose a solution.
    Kindly help me
    Regards
    Goutham

    hi Goutham,
    you need to configure your item categories for revenue recognition based on milestones. Thus, what happens then is you are separating revenues and billing. You can continue billing your customer for whatever milestones you have 50/40/10%, and the revenue can be recognized on the completion of the final milestone.
    For customizing revenue recognition type on item category level go to
    Sales and Distribution -> Basic Functions -> Account assignment / Costing ->
      Revenue Recognition, Or via transaction: OVEP.
    Set Revenue recoginition as Category ‘A’ timebased revenue recognition
    and Accrual period start as B -proposal based on billing plan start date
    in a milestone billing plan, the billing date of the first milestone is then taken as accrual start date.
    You can work on the latest version of the Revenue Recognition Best Practices Guide. The link can be found in note 779365.
    Thanks

  • Billing based on actual quality

    Dear Gurus,
    In our client company, they deal in different ore. If i want to ask a question only on sales side, then if their customer wants an ore with some qualities as captured in the variant configurator, like:
    Character 1 = 65%
    Character 2 = 2%
    Character 3 = 12%
    The price for this combination is (say) 100$/ton
    But since this is ore, chances are that always that is not what comes out of the mine. So when it comes to doing delivey the quality changes to something like:
    Character 1 = 62%
    Character 2 = 1.67%
    Character 3 = 14%
    The price for this combination could be (say) 92$/ton
    This information is only known at the time of delivery and this information has to be captured only at the delivery level and cannot be captured back in sales order, since for each sales order, there can be multiple deliveries, each delivery with different quality. But as per rule, customer has to be billed as per the Quality he receives. That is:
    Sales Order SO1234 - Quantity 100 tons - Quality Combo1
              Delivery DEL567 - Quantity 15 tons - Quality Combo2
              Delivery DEL568 - Quantity 20 tons - Quality Combo3
              Delivery DEL569 - Quantity 18 tons - Quality Combo4    and so on . . . .
    One small deviation is sometimes when the Quality analysis is not received on time, billing has to done on the quality as available in the sales order and the difference, if any, will be adjusted through Credit / Debit notes.
    If someone can throw some light on this and give me a dynamic solution possibilities, that would be just great. Would appreciate all you help.
    Best regards
    Venkat - Hyd

    Dear Yajee,
    Please correct me if i am wrong.
    1)The variant configuration has been done.
    2) The pricing is based on variants (characteristics).
    3) In delivery, the characteristics may differ from the orginal sales order.
    Now , system should pick the price based on the characteristic values in delivery.
    This requirement can be handled by using a Alternative condition base value in pricing assigned against the condition type for pricing.
    The logic for the same will be
    During VF01, system should fetch the record of the characteristics used for delivery and use the same values to
    fetch the pricing records updated in the price tables.
    Try this out with the help of ABAPer and revert back.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Hegal

  • Billing Based on DIP Profile - PS - SD Line Items Structure

    Hi,
    I have created a sales order with 1 line item which is linked with a WBS Element via account assignment.
    Based on the line item and WBS structure & Activities. I am billing the customer by creating a debit memo from DP91.
    The billing is POC basis and is done on monthly basis. Thus at the end of each month the customer is billed according to quantities confirmed in DP91. Ultimately the complete project is done and all billing is completed as well.
    Now the problem is: sales order line item had 1 quantity, however debit memo created via DP91 had more than 1 quantities and we have created multiple debit memo request w.r.t. a sales order. now the project is completed, but the status of the sales order is stilll "open". what should be the structure of sales order line items so that order is also set as completed when all quantities in PS are billed.
    waiting for any kind of supportive information.
    thanks.

    Hi Robert,
    You have 2 questions
    1. On DIP
    DIP has nothing to do with WBS, though you use WBS as one of teh characteristics in DIP. As per your DIP, many sales orders are created and they are enabled with different material (material determination in DIP). In order to analyse this further, you have to analyse the DIP, which is linked to your item category in VOV7. If not in VOV7, you can see the DIP name in the item level in the sales order. Using this, you can go to PS and there you can see the characteristics, usage and materials configured for this profile. This will give you a lead to find out why multiple items are coming. As per DIP profile, having multiple materials while creating documents in DP91 is expected behaviour.
    2. For sales order update, you have to invoice all your billing plans, if your order items are billing plans enabled, (may be MS billing as your system has PS also). If you check this, and invoice all the milestones, then the status will be updated automatically. Before updating the sales order status, you should also close all the WBS elements and the project, which are linked to the sales order (I am not sure about this point, but you can try it in the test system, be have the system of one project per salesorder, may not be the case for you)
    If you have any specific questions, pls lemme know.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Driver issue for Epson cx4800

    Hello, I have an Epson cx4800 that I can't find a driver for that is compatible with OS X. Does anyone know if one exists? Thank You, Rob

  • Hello... scary message on disk utility

    hello. i know there are a couple of messages that i can safely ignore.. i read the article but i just got the scariest message... this is the whole transcript and i hope someone can help me with this.. i dont wanna go through the whole reinstalling t

  • Cannot log onto Apple Support Communities under established Apple ID

    I had to create a new Apple ID (one I have neither desire nor intention to use) in order to get back on to the Support Forum. When I log in with my old established Apple ID it prompts me to choose a user name--then I get caught in this ****-loop wher

  • Can't Upgrade Iphone 3G 3.1.3 OS to 4.2 OS

    I have an Iphone model number MB704LL that was recently restored to the factory defaults. When i select the update button which has a message stating a newer version of the Iphone software is available (version 4.2)....When I click on the button I ge

  • HT204023 Iphone 4s straight talk- 3G connection disappears.

    Iphone 4s factory unlocked  - 3G connection disappears. please today my 3G icon disappears,no 3G working now,I really do not know what happened to the iphone,please  i need help... my company is straight talk....