Delegation using A999 Relationship from Chief Position to Person ID

Hi
We have occasions in which we have managers in chief positions that need to delegate duties to others in their organisation. This is enabled via the set-up of an A999 delegate relationship that goes from the Chief Position to the person that they wish to delegate responsibility to.
Is there a report or transaction that can be used to understand what A999 delegation rules are in place to determine who the delegates are possibly. Example I set-up A999 relationship on a chief position # and indicate (P) Person related object, specifying the person id to undertake delegation. If someone asks me to tell them which position # a particular person is delegate for I have know way of knowing, unless I can find this via a report some way.
Is it possible?
Thanks
Nicola

Hi,
Yes.. check it out the document in the Evaluation Path transaction OOAW. Select the info button of A999. You will get the doc about that relationship. If that is customized one, you need to maintain the relationship doc.
Good luck.
Om
Reward it, if feels helpful.

Similar Messages

Difference between Relationship A/B002 (Reports to) and Chief Position?

Hi Everyone,
What is the difference between relationship A/B002 (Position X reports to Position Y) as opposed to everyone in the same org unit reporting to the chief? What is the difference between these 2 types of reporting relationship? If both the relationship exist at the same system, what does the system recognizes?

Hi Lee,
To   Get the managers id from HRP1001, where the employee with
     object id (p0001-plans) reports to(A-002) a managers id - v_mangid.
check the following code snippet***************
IF NOT p0001-orgeh IS INITIAL .
    SELECT SINGLE sobid
                  FROM hrp1001
                  INTO v_sobid_1
                  WHERE otype EQ c_o
                    AND objid EQ p0001-orgeh
                    AND rsign EQ c_a
                    AND relat EQ c_002
                    AND plvar EQ c_plvar
                    AND istat EQ c_istat
                    AND begda LE sy-datum
                    AND endda GE sy-datum
                    AND sclas EQ c_o.
    IF sy-subrc = 0 .
      SELECT SINGLE sobid
                    FROM hrp1001
                    INTO v_sobid_2
                    WHERE otype EQ c_o
                    AND   objid EQ v_sobid_1
                    AND   rsign EQ c_b
                   AND   relat EQ c_012
                   AND   plvar EQ c_plvar
                    AND   begda LE sy-datum
                    AND   endda GE sy-datum
                    AND   sclas EQ c_s .
      If the above statement is successful.(i.e if the employee has a manager)
      IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
        SELECT SINGLE pernr
            FROM pa0001
            INTO v_pernr                                    "wa_pa0002
            WHERE plans EQ v_sobid_2
            AND   begda LE sy-datum
            AND   endda GE sy-datum.
        IF sy-subrc = 0 .
          SELECT SINGLE
            nachn
            vorna
            FROM pa0002
            INTO (wa_output-reportsto_last_name , wa_output-reportsto_first_name)"wa_pa0002
            WHERE pernr EQ v_pernr
            AND   begda LE sy-datum
            AND   endda GE sy-datum.
        ENDIF.     " End of IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
   ENDIF.
or even u can check this FM too.
To find Level 1, Level2, Level 3 Reporting Manager for an employee.
Pernr--> Leve1 Manager --> Leve2 Manager --> Leve3 Manager .
   Use Function Module RH_STRUC_GET by passing positions.
OR You can Use this scenario also.
For fetching Level 1 manager, there are 2 options:
                      1.You can use FM RH_GET_LEADER for PERNR,Position or User
                      2.Use FM RH_READ_INFTY with Subtype = A008.
For Fetching Level2 manager,
                      1. Fetch Level 1 manager.
                      2. Get Level1 manager's Org.
                      3. Get Level2 manager using FM RH_GET_LEADER.
Try this ...
Regards
Rohini Devi B G

Using Rule 168, SWX_GET_MANAGER and Chief Position

We have enabled standard SAP Travel Workflow WS20000040 - Approve Trip. We are not currently using OM relationships A002 (Reports Line to) or B002 (Is Line Supervisor of). We currently identify the Line Manager of the employee using the Chief Position designation A 012 and would like to use this for Trip approvals in lieu of building all of these additional relationships.
Rule 168 is bound to the workflow. According to the documentation associated with the rule, it seems that the rule should work with either the A002 or A012 relationship. However, we only seem to be getting a superior identified when relationship A002/B002 exists.
Are there additional configuration or parameter settings that we might need to consider to make the manager (agent) determined properly exclusively with the Chief Position assignment?
Thanks for any guidance you can provide.
Regards,
Edited by: Bruce Hull on Jul 24, 2008 5:37 PM
Edited by: Bruce Hull on Jul 24, 2008 5:37 PM
Edited by: Bruce Hull on Jul 24, 2008 7:29 PM

What I found through trial and error is that rule 168 does indeed evaluate the A012 relationship by default with no change in the standard evaluation path. In our testing system, the "Chief" postion was not properly assigned. Once this was resolved, the workflow works properly.
As a side note, I also learned that you must have the parameter WFLOW VAPOS set for the rule to properly look up the organizational structure when a position (and chief) are vacant.

How to extract subordinate-superior-Chief Position relationship

Hi,
I need a report in the following format:
Employee Pernr, Employee Name, Org. Unit, Superior Pernr, Superior Name, Chief Position.
How can I do this?
My PD consultant needs this because he has to store this information.
Points asssured!
Thanks and regards,
Nivedita.

Hi,
You'll need to go by extracting data quite a few times through HRP and PA tables. SE16.
Function modules..u'l get the data for single employee unless u use it in Z report.
1. Find all O-S B012 relationships -- Chief
2. For all chiefs find subordinates S-S B002 relationship (keep one wrksheet for this)
3. PA0001 find personnel numbers for all positions for ENDDA 31.12.9999
4. PA0002 find person names
5. VLOOKUP the personnel numbers against postion names and employee names against personnel numbers in the same sheet.
Seems a very tedious process but I had used the same to extract these details, did not find nething standard.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Shreyasi.

Org Unit with more than one Chief Position

Hi,
we have implemented MSS via the portal using a one-to-one relationship between Org Units and Chief Positions, and we would now like to have multiple Chief positions attached to one Org Unit.
As far as I can tell from the SAP documentation, this should be straightforward, but the results we are getting do not seem correct.
I have an Org Unit that has position 1 and position 2 assigned to it with relationship A/B 012 denoting that they are Chief Positions.
User 1 is holder of position 1 and user 2 is holder of position 2.
Both users have the same security roles.
The views used on the portal are configured using the MSS Object and Data Provider functionality, using the standard ORGEH view, evaluation path for root objects SAP_MANG and evaluation path objects SBES. The checkbox 'Excl. Managers' is ticked.
The problem is this - both users can see all the subordinate employees in the Org Unit when they log on to MSS but user 1 can also see user 2 in his list of employees, which is not correct as user 1 and user 2 are both chiefs. User 2 cannot see user 1 in his list of employees, which we would expect.
The only logic we can see for user 1 being able to see user 2's details is that user 1 must be somehow defined as the 'superior' Chief Position, but we have not defined this as far as we know.
Any ideas as to why this is happening for us?
Many thanks,
Fran.

Hi Fran,
Sounds like you have set up the reporting structures and MSS properly. I do question why two chiefs for one org unit. As you stated, both can see all employees and so both can approve time, give pay increases, etc. without the approval of the other. If this is want you want, then you have set it up properly. Usually, one has to approve the actions of the other, thus, is in a superior relationship. This can be handled by having a higher level new org unit with the higher person as chief and the lower stay as head of the lower org unit which reports to it.
As you have it now, both individuals have the same rights and access. They should both be excluded from iViews if you checked the "Excl. Managers" box. Since, you just recently made one a manager, have you checked for any date dependencies? If the Chief #1 is selecting a view for "Current Year", for example, he would be able to see all persons who reported to him for this year, which includes Chief #2. There are no 'superior chief' designations (except by structure), so without being able to view your configuration, my suggestion is to check all dates for the assignments and relationships vs. dates of the view.

One Chief Position in One Org Unit

Hi
I want to restrict the number of chief positions in an org unit. One org unit should have only one chief position.
Please guide me on how to achieve this.
Regards
Minal

Dear Minal,
Use T-code-OOZR create an entry with the combination
O-1001-B012-S-0, so that you can restrict 1position as chief of the org unit. In case you want to change the chief then, select another position of the unit and create chief position, automatically earlier position's chief relationship record is deleted.
Regards,
Anil.

Assign Chief Position to custom OM Object Business Unit

Hello
Is it recommended or doable to assign chief position via 012 relationship to the top most custom object Business Unit. Currently the chief position relationships is for Org Units. We would like to keep Chief Position to OU, also if possible to create similar 012 relationship to Business Unit. Since Business Unit will have one-to-many relationship with Regions, need is to identify chief position for the Business Unit for reporting purposes.
Evaluation path for Business Unit - Region - OU - Position - Person.
Thank you.

yes, in om structure it will be seen as top most OM object business unit (top most) region --> o.u. --> position --> person. Can I use 012 relationship of position assigned to top most business unit and keep 012 position relationship to OU.?
Narrowing down. Currently, chief position relationship is assigned to top OU that is tied to region 1:1 relationship. Now with the new top most custom object business unit has many regions. So need to identify top most region tied to business unit via 012 position.
Is it possible and how?

Position- Central Person relationship not showed

Hi
Relationship between Position-Central Person objects is not showed via trx. PPOMA_CRM, but it is present if trx. BP is used. Could someone help me to solve it, please???
Thanks everybody

Yes
The relationship will get created automatically
B209 Person to Central Person and this relationship will help you to POST the documents into FICO
i Mean without the Creation of this Relationship Posting Document cannot be created and if this relationship is not there in the system means
you will get an error while Hireing an Employee states " No Interval Range Found " but we can hireing the employee
so, this one is mandatory and this relationshipe will get created from $$$$ in Tcode OONR and also check Table NRIV
For more info check the documentation of the follwoing report
RPU46CX_CENTRAL_PERSON_ONLINE

How can I use a pic from iPhoto as a background for a page, How can I use a pic as a background for a page

How can I use a pic from iPhoto as a background for a page, How can I use a pic as a background for a page

cd,
Insert the picture and position it as you desire
Make sure the picture is set to Floating in the Wrap Inspector
Arrange > Send Objects to Background
Regards,

Error while transferring an employee from one position to another

When i am transferring an employee from one position to another i am not being able to do so. This position is visible in HRP10001.

Hi,
Have you tried using any other aciton like Org re-assignment, promotion action etc or tryid in PA30 itself?
Regards
ET

How to find out that position is a chief position or not?

Hi All,
Kindly let me know to find out the position is a chief position or not?
I have to display various positions with Y if it is a manager and N if it is not.
Thanks!
Sachin

Hi
1. tcode PPOME
2. select the position by double click
in the overview position, chief position will be differentiate by symbol a person with red clothes and wearing a hat
in the tab "Basic Data", chief position can be defined if the "Head of own organizational unit" is being ticked/flagged.
Head of Organizational Unit
If you flag this field, the position becomes the chief position of the organizational unit that it belongs to. When this position is displayed again, it is automatically flagged and is automatically the chief position.
Technically, a relationship (A/B 012) is created between the organizational unit and the position.
Field Name : OMLEADER
Data Element: HROMLEADER
hope this info helps you.
best regards,
dhenny muliawaty (pei pei)

Is it possible to delete a relationship from the BP ?

Hello experts,
I'd would like to replace a function partner SH (having the same number as the DO) by another from R3 to CRM5.
At the begining i have in R3 this partner
AG 3901007
RE 3901007
RG 3901007
WE 3901007
In R3 by the transaction VD02, I replace the partner SH by another
After the modify i have in R3.
AG 3901007
RE 3901007
RG 3901007
WE 5000000
When the replication is done in CRM using BDOC, i can see, by the transaction BP
the new ship to party partner(5000000) .
The trouble is :
When customer access to ISA (standard version) to order product, he can select the partner 3901007 as shipping adress.
By ISA, he should have the partner 5000000 only.
Is it standard or is it a sap trouble ?
Is it possible to delete a relationship from the BP ?
I don't want to delete the BP partner, i just want to delete the relationship when then BDOC arrive in CRM.
i have found the oss note 596334 497146 757955 too but it doesn't bring me a solution.
Best regards
Christophe

Hello
When you delete a Partner Function in R/3 the corresponding relationshipdoesn't get deleted in CRM. This is standard SAP behavior and not a
bug. Reason for this behavior has been explained in Note 490454.
You can change this behavior by implementing Note 497146. Also check
the note 682427 which will help you in clearing old data.

More than 1 line of text when using text generator from file?

hi
have 8 line blocks of text to show onscreen.
would like to use text generatorn>from file
all they seem to print is one line.
is there a work around?
have trhied soft returns and paragraphs on saved text file.
no change.
anyonre know how to get 2 or more lines of text?
thanks in addvance!

Select the File generator layer and in the Inspector, select the Layout pane and in Layout controls, set the Layout Method to Paragraph. Narrow your margins and the text will "flow" into multiple lines.
You can also keyframe the paragraph layout position. [Probably more info than you want here.]
That said, you can only display *one line* at a time per File Generator. (If you're up to date with Motion [v5.1.2], you can use more than one File generator.) The generator does not accept any other characters for returns other than newline and carriage return.
I've never tried it, but thinking about it, you can set Tab stops in the Paragraph layout (double click in the layout rectangle and a ruler should appear over the top -- right click on the ruler to set tabs). If you go back into the original text file and where you need to break lines into two or more, setting a left tab stop in the layout very near the end of a line might force the tabbed text into the next line (did I make that clear enough??)

Problem using jsp:include from inside a custom tag

Hi, All !
          I have a problem using <jsp:include> from inside a custom tag. Exception is:
          "java.lang.ClassCastException: weblogic.servlet.jsp.BodyContentImpl"
          Apparently, weblogic tries to cast BodyContentImpl to JspWriterImpl and
          could not do this. Is it a bug, since in the 1.1 spec is said: "The
          BodyContent is a subclass of JspWriter that can be used to process body
          evaluations so they can retrieved later on."
          My code is:
          <wfmklist:items>
          <jsp:include page="item.jsp" flush="true"/>
          </wfmklist:items>


This is an area of contention with WL. It is not so tolerant with regards to
          the spec. I spent several days recently trying to convince it to accept the
          specification in regards to bodies and includes and it appears to have
          successfully rebuffed my efforts.
          Frankly, this is very disappointing. It appears that some shortcuts were
          taken on the way to JSP 1.1 support, and the result is a very hard-coded,
          inflexible implementation. As I have not seen the implementation myself, I
          hate to assume this, however one could posit that the term "interface" was a
          foreign concept during the implementation, other than as some annoying
          intermediary reference requiring an immediate cast to a specific Weblogic
          class, which in turn is apparently required to be final or have many final
          methods, as if being optimized for a JDK 1.02 JIT.
          I am sorry that I don't have any positive suggestions other than to use a
          URL object to come back in an execute the necessary "include" directly. You
          lose all context (other than session) and that can cause its own problems.
          However, you can generally get the URL approach to work, and you will
          hopefully avoid further frustration.
          Peace,
          Cameron Purdy
          Tangosol, Inc.
          http://www.tangosol.com
          Tangosol: How Weblogic applications are customized
          "Denis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          news:[email protected]...
          > Hi, All !
          > I have a problem using <jsp:include> from inside a custom tag. Exception
          is:
          > "java.lang.ClassCastException: weblogic.servlet.jsp.BodyContentImpl"
          >
          > Apparently, weblogic tries to cast BodyContentImpl to JspWriterImpl and
          > could not do this. Is it a bug, since in the 1.1 spec is said: "The
          > BodyContent is a subclass of JspWriter that can be used to process body
          > evaluations so they can retrieved later on."
          >
          > My code is:
          > ...
          > <wfmklist:items>
          > <jsp:include page="item.jsp" flush="true"/>
          > </wfmklist:items>
          > ...

User without the Chief position in org id to view the resources under him.

Hi,
The requirement is:
A person who is playing the role of a crew leader should be able to fill the time sheet of his crew. This person will not be given the chief position for the org id that he is tagged to. There will be different person who will be tagged to the chief position and will be playing the role of a manager.
I want to understand, what exactly needs to be done in MSS for the crew leader to fill his team's timesheet ?
Regards,
Rukmani

As such in MSS we have self services in general information page, where manager can enter details for his employees which are determined by evaluation path who reports to him which is again configurable done using OADP
In your case make a new evaluation path for the user so that he can see which employees are assigned to him not necessarily he has to be a manager
refer all information here
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=190743879
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/2e/5a5d45d9f24fbdb06be2ff53651c3e/frameset.htm
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=104006108

Delegation using A999 Relationship from Chief Position to Person ID

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for