Deliver Reports Large number of users.

Hi Experts,
We want to deliver set of reports to our customers (1000 customers) with data level security.
i.e., A customer can only see their data.
How can I achieve this using BI Publisher.? Do we require licenses for these numbers of users.?
Can you please help.?
Thank You.

Hi Damodhar
User mapping can be done in the programming level. The User Management Engine in EP 6.0 provides two interfaces to access the user mapping data namely
1. IUserMappingService.
2. IUserMappingData.
You can implement these two intefaces to enable User Mapping. Please refer to the following link for further details.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/69/3482ee0d70492fa63ffe519f5758f5/content.htm
Hope that was helpful.
Best Regards
Priya

Similar Messages

Report the number of users who provisioned a My-site on sharepoint online?

I have a Office 365 SharePoint instance that we have activated a large number of user accounts on, I am trying to find a way to run a report that will show me the total count of users who have logged into SharePoint and provisioned a my-site. essentially
a list of the total number of my-sites and the name or ID of the user they belong to. We are trying to gauge adoption across the organization, a report like this would be really valuable. Any chance someone knows an easy solution for this?
yaddaimean

My Sites are typically located within a common location, like http://sharepoint/my/* or http://my.sharepoint.com/*
Assuming this is the case in your tenant, I would try the
Get-SPOSite cmdlet to get a list of sites that match a particular filter or pipe the results through a where clause. I've never done this myself and don't have a tenant to test against but I imagine it would look something like this:
$mysites = Get-SPOSite -Limit All | where {$_.Url -Like "http://sharepoint/my/*"}
$mysites.Count
I can't find any information about the SPOSite object. I'm assuming it has an Owner property like the SPSite object. If it does, you should be able to get a list of users who have created a My Site:
foreach ($mysite in $mysites) {
$mysite.Owner
I honestly hope this works :)
Jason Warren
@jaspnwarren
jasonwarren.ca
habaneroconsulting.com/Insights

SSO with large number of users

Hi,
We want to implement SSO using user mapping because we have different user ids from system to system.
We have large number of users in our system, how can we implement user mapping.
Is there anyway to write a program so that it can take care of user mapping, if yes? can you please give overview so that i can dig in to it.
Thanks,
Damodhar.

Hi Damodhar
User mapping can be done in the programming level. The User Management Engine in EP 6.0 provides two interfaces to access the user mapping data namely
1. IUserMappingService.
2. IUserMappingData.
You can implement these two intefaces to enable User Mapping. Please refer to the following link for further details.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/69/3482ee0d70492fa63ffe519f5758f5/content.htm
Hope that was helpful.
Best Regards
Priya

Delegated Admin reports strange number of users

I recently noted that our Delegated Admin (Delegated Administrator 6.4-2.05, B2008-04-29) Organizations page
(the one which lists the hosted domains and particularly their "Number of Users") lists this number plain wrong.
For many organizations it is reported as 0 or 1, for one there's a blank line, and only one seemingly has 39 users.
When I click on organizations however, I see their full lists of users (I believe, ones which have a non-empty mail
attribute set in LDAP) and there are tens in most orgs and over a hundred accounts in the larger org.
What is wrong? Does DA's Organization-List page use some other means of counting the users than the individual
Organization's page?

JimKlimov wrote:
In fact, while importing our old server, I did initialize most domains' users via
ldapclient queries as discussed on-list in mid-2008. Nobody said that there
are other static values outside of a user's account data :)The sunnumusers: attribute is commonly overlooked -- primarily because it is for admin-interface purposes only and doesn't impact on the operation of user accounts.
Is it possible to replace this value of sunnumusers by a dynamic search (or
counter), either in the GUI code or perhaps in the LDAP attribute?No. Any such dynamic search would have an adverse performance impact on the DA interface for large environments.
What is the logically correct value, the count of users with mail attribute set?If you want the sunnumusers: to match the number of users displayed when you click on the organisation in the "Organizations" tab then you would count the users which matched the following search for the domain:
""(&(uid=*)(&(objectClass=inetuser)(|(inetUserStatus=active)(inetUserStatus=inactive))))""
Regards,
Shane.

DBA Reports large number of inactive sessions with 11.1.1.1

All,
We have installed System 11.1.1.1 on some 32 bit windows test machines running Windows Server 2003. Everything seems to be working fine, but recently the DBA is reporting that there are a large number of inactive sessions throwing alarms that we are reaching our Max Allowed Process on the Oracle Database server. We are running Oracle 10.2.0.4 on AIX.
We also have some System 9.3.1 Development servers that point at separate schemas in this environment and we don't see the same high number of inactive connections?
Most of the inactive connections are coming from Shared Services and Workspace. Anyone else see this or have any ideas?
Thanks for any responses.
Keith
Just a quick update. Originally I said this was only with 11.1.1.1 but we see the same high number of inactive sessions in 9.3. Anyone else see a large number of inactive sessions. They show up in Oracle as JDBC_Connect_Client. Does Shared Service, Planning Workspace etc utilize persistent connections or does it just abandon sessions when the windows service associated with an application is shutdown? Any information or thoughts are appreciated.
Edited by: Keith A on Oct 6, 2009 9:06 AM

Hi,
Not the answer you are looking for but have you logged it with Oracle as you might not get many answers to this question on here.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Setting a Default Page Filter for Large Number of Users?

Hi Everyone,
I'm currently running Oracle Business Intelligence (OBIEE) 10.1.3.3.3 and have a quick question regarding page filters.
I have a report with several page filters. One of the page filters is a multi-select filter of values A, B and C.
I want to configure my report such that all of my users who log into this report, will automatically be defaulted to the results where the page filter is pre-selected to be equaled to "A". Obviously, if the user wants to then choose another option, he/she may do so manually by toggling the page filter after the report initially renders.
The only simple way I know how to configure this is through a manual process of logging into the user's account, selecting Page Filter = 'A' for them, and saving their selections under Page Options. Once saved, there is a checkbox that I can select to make this saved selection the default home page for this report for that particular user.
The problem is that if I have several hundred users, it would be unfeasible for me to go and manually modify each user's account one by one to set the page filter = 'A' for each login.
There has to be an easier way to universally set a page filter on a certain report such that any group of users (that I can define) will see the same initial, default page filter value settings that I choose.
Does anyone know of an easier method to accomplish this?
Thanks,
Alan

Hi,
1. Please put filter value default A then when user login in OBIEE it will display always A data only.
2. Which security method are you implemented means LDAP/External table kindly conform.
If you want see the same page across all users.you have to create table in Database.
Follow below steps.
1. create table in database like below.
col1 col2
groupname Dashboard portal path
2. Create system variable Go--> Manage-->Variables --> select system variable --> New Portal Path option.
3. This variable apply in group level.
I am not sure this what your looking so far.
Award points it is useful.
Thanks,
Satya

Virtual Storage Error Count report large number

Hi,
I've win 2012 std with hyperv role on it.
i've setup a virtual machine with 1 IDE disk and 1 SCSI disk all VHD on local disk.
when i monitor the server with veeam one it report that the Virtual Storage Error Count in large (9) on the SCSI driver even if this drive is not loaded at all.
why is that?

Hi,
I've win 2012 std with hyperv role on it.
i've setup a virtual machine with 1 IDE disk and 1 SCSI disk all VHD on local disk.
when i monitor the server with veeam one it report that the Virtual Storage Error Count in large (9) on the SCSI driver even if this drive is not loaded at all.
why is that?
I've seen this particular issue on several occasions as well as from various monitoring tools. Here is another thread concerning this same alert for a Virtual Storage Device Error Count with a value of 9, however, the source of the alert in this case is
the Hyper V Management Pack for System Center Operations Manager:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/operationsmanagermgmtpacks/thread/6f4248aa-ed66-4ae1-b767-8238efc2e162/
In each of these instances of the issue, there are a few environmental variables that generally seem to remain the same -
The affected VM's are Server 2012 or Windows 8 guests running on a Server 2012 Hyper V host.
The VHD's reporting the high Virtual Storage Device Error Count are using a SCSI controller.
The disks are not pass-through disks ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2624495 )
In most cases the same value of 9 is reported for the error count metric.
The same error count value can be observed within Perfmon.exe on the host containing the affected VM(s) by adding the following performance counter for the affected VHD(s):
Hyper-V Virtual Storage Device > Error Count
The metric value for the affected VHD(s) can be reset by powering off the VM and rebooting the host server, however, this is often not possible in a production environment. Additionally, the error count value climbs to and halts at 9 immediately after the VM
is powered back on. I've observed this behavior in Perfmon.exe while testing ways to reset the counter and, in turn, clear the alarms from any monitoring tools. There do not seem to be any correlating events logged in the Event Viewer or cluster
events that would indicate that there actually is an issue occurring with the Virtual Storage Device.
Overriding the alert completely would not be ideal as this would cause no alerts to trigger in the event of an actual problem with the device, thus I would like to find a way to reset only this particular performance counter while both the host and the VM(s)
are powered on. Additionally, any information in regards to the root cause of this issue would be appreciated!

UserIdentityStores Creation fails in case large number at User Search Base

ou=users1,o=test contains 300 000 users.
ou=users2,o=test contains 10 users.
ou=users3,o=test contains 10 users.
If i create UserIdentityStores with ou=users1, OAM shows fails "
Failed to connect to User Identity Store.
URL or Credentials specified are invalid.
No entries were found under the User Search Base : username with attribute : ou=users1,o=test.
If i create UserIdentityStores with ou=users2, OAM shows successfully"
If i create UserIdentityStores with ou=users3, OAM shows successfully"
Configuration:
* User Name Attribute : username
* User Search Base : ou=users1,o=test
User Filter Object Classes : sso
* Group Search Base : cn=sso-group,o=test
This is ODSEE:
o=test
-- ou=users2
---- username=123
---- username=456
-- ou=users3
---- username=abc
---- username=123
-- ou=users4
-- cn=sso-group
-- ou=users1
Is it a bug with OAM when users1 had too much DN inside. I stuck 2 weeks at this step. Any advices is apprecited.
Thank you!

Thanks.
Yes, I know of that 100 column limitation. But notice that I had 79 columns. Also, it doesn't mention the fact that you can display a certain amount a column, but you are then not able to use the search bar fully.
"One interactive report per page.
100 columns can be seen using report columns. You can edit additional columns using Tree view or paginating through Report Column Attributes.
1,000,000 rows per column heading filter (if no custom LOV is specified in the column attributes).
You can edit additional columns using Tree view or paginating through Report Column Attributes."
So the issue that I have is a non documented issue, unless I'm missing something.

Copy items to large number of users

I am a wee bit new to ARD and have (what I'm sure is) an easy question. I'm trying to copy a file to a specific path inside each user's home folder. is there a way to do this in ARD without having to type in each user's LDAP account name in each of the paths?

This is ABSOLUTELY possible.
We used this at my school to copy files to a PARTITION which was not the boot disk.
The ARD computer is turned off and unaccessible at the moment, but the functionality is in the COPY ITEMS interface.
Select a group of computers in the Scanner, add them to All Computers. Select the Targets and then choose the COPY button on the top of the screen. The first PULLDOWN menu has a choice which will let you enter a PATH to a directory.
To get the path, I used ARD to control one of the targets and I then dragged the partition into Terminal to get its path as Text. I copied that on the client, then exported the clipboard to the ARD control machine and then I could use the path to target the copy.
Of course, the partition and path name need to be the same on all the client computers.
Good luck. This is DEFINITELY POSSIBLE.
Just a caveat though, it uses MULTICASTING to broadcast the files out over your entire network. We have IP phones here and trying to push out 50GB of data as multicast is crashing our phones. I'm searching this message board to find a way to PREVENT MULTICASTING.

Sending large number of emails from SharePoint

Hello,
I am in a situation where we have to develop a solution using client side/ootb features of SP 2013 to send emails to a large number of users from a SharePoint list. The list will have 10000+ user information logically grouped. The user should be able
to select anyone or many groups to send emails notification. Each group can contain close to 5000+ user emails. The list can contain email ids of people outside the organization so SP groups cannot be used. Can you suggest a clean solution that will not
have a serious performance impact? Nintex workflows can also be considered if it will not affect the performance and if it is reliable in this situation. Appreciate any pointers/approach.
Thanks,
Aj
aju

Hi
create a powershell script to send these mails.
http://www.ehow.com/how_8510132_send-email-powershell.html
If you need more details, let me know
Romeo Donca, Orange Romania (MCSE, MCITP, CCNA) Please Mark As Answer if my post solves your problem or Vote As Helpful if the post has been helpful for you.

Can OBIEE deliver reports to email addresses of non-OBIEE users?

We are considering using OBIEE, but one of our requirements is to be able to schedule and deliver basic reports (Excel or PDF perhaps) via email to a relatively large number of recipients.
When I say "relatively large number" - what I mean is: more recipients than we want to buy licenses for. These recipients would not need or be allowed access to anything other than the scheduled report that we send to them on a weekly or monthly basis, so it makes no sense for us to buy licenses for them.
But from what I can find so far, OBIEE only delivers reports to licensed users.
Is there in fact some way to schedule and email reports to any (non-user) email address from within OBIEE?
Or would I need a separate third party solution to accomplish this? (Any suggestions would be appreciated!)
Thanks!

If you store the ppl in a table (basically any datasource you attack with the rpd), you create a request pulling up all the targeted user, then in the "Recipients" tab of the iBot, you can choose
"Determine recipients from conditional request"
Then you specify the "Column Containing Recipients".
Venakt wrote about it a while ago, as well: http://oraclebizint.wordpress.com/2007/12/28/oracle-bi-ee-101332-report-bursting-using-delivers-phase1-using-pipelined-functions/

Large Number of Multi-Select Parameter Values does not generate Report

I have a SSRS Report that requires 4 multi-select parameters.
The report is deployed on a SharePoint website with SSRS integration.
I calculated, if the user selects 'Select All' for one specific customer, there could be at most 2700 possible parameter values among the 4 parameters.
In some cases, when a user selects 'Select All' and clicks Apply, nothing happens. No icon showing Processing Report.
If a user selects 'Select All' and the total number parameter values are under 500 for a specific customer, there is an icon showing Processing Report.
I followed the instructions at:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/b02ccb5d-6019-4d63-bd6c-8baff24fffd8/sql-server-limit-on-the-number-of-multivalue-parameter-selections?forum=sqlreportingservices
That did not help.
Thanks in advance.

Install the latest update of SQL Server :
2008 SP2 : http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=12548
2008 R2 SP2 : http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30437
2012 SP1 : http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=35579

Maximum number of users Per Conference on monthly reports

Can anyone has SQl query to fetch the maximum number of users per conference in Lync 2010 on monthly basis .
in monitoring report this report is not coming so please give some workaround .
Ashwani Thapa

Have you seen this? http://blogs.technet.com/b/rischwen/archive/2014/01/17/per-user-conference-joins-grouped-by-uritype-sql-query.aspx
If this helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer"
Georg Thomas | Lync MVP
Blog www.lynced.com.au | Twitter
@georgathomas
Lync Edge Port Check (Beta)
This forum post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Report model - number of values selected in DDL param

Good afternoon,
I have created a report model that references Teradata views, and I am using this model to populate several datasets in a Report Builder report. One dataset returns actual results, and the other datasets are used to populate available values for multivalued
parameters.
The issue I'm encountering is that some of my parameters return a large number (tens or hundreds of thousands) of selectable values. When clicking "select all", I'm getting an error, since the concatenated list of values exceeds
the length limit. However, since I'm working with a report model, I cannot use T-SQL workarounds such as custom "<ALL>" values/handling. I also need to limit my result set using these values as parameters, not filters, since I want
the intensive processing handled in the DB server, not the app server.
Is there any possible way to accommodate this? As an example, I have a large (200k+) list of products, belonging to about 7,000 brands. I want both my product number and brand lists as multivalue parameters...I might want to run
the report for all products and all brands (returning 200k+ rows), or choose "select all" in the products list, but only pick a few brands (or vice versa). Cascading parameters (with the first parameter limiting the next set of values)
is not an option since there are many of these parameters that have too many values for the allowed limit (i.e. even my brand list generated the error when I choose "select all" and only picked a few products).
I have searched literally dozens of forums and tech sites, all to no avail thus far. Any assistance will be greatly appreciated...thank you!
-Chris

I have a SSRS Report with 4 multi-select parameters.
The customer has requested that they would like the drill-through to open in a new window.
I am using Java Script for that purpose.
However, there is a limit on how long a URL may be.
Is there a way in a SSRS report to limit the number of values in a multi-select parameter selected?
Thanks.
One workaround is to add a internal parameter which will count the number of selected values and will allow the navigation only if the count falls below the threshold.
For this you can use an expression like below for setting the internal parameter
Len(Join(Parameters!MultiValuedParameter.Value,","))-Replace(Join(Parameters!MultiValuedParameter.Value,","),",","")
Then use expression like below for the jump to url/report property
IIf(Val(Parameters!HiddenParameter.Value)<=<your thresholdvalue>,<report url>,Nothing)
You can also add a notification textbox on top which will show a message like "Report navigation not possible due to too many values selected" and keep it hidden by default. Then based on above parameter value you can make it visible
ie make hidden property like below
IIf(Val(Parameters!HiddenParameter.Value)<=<your thresholdvalue>,False,True)
Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
Please Vote This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
Visakh
My Wiki User Page
My MSDN Page
My Personal Blog
My Facebook Page

Status and messaging for systems with a large number of classes

Very common dilemma we coders face when creating
systems involving a large number of classes:
Any standard framework to take care of the global status of the whole application and of gui subsystems
for both status handling and report messages to users?
Something light if possible...and not too much threads.

Ah, I see,
I found JPanel with CardLayout or a JTabbedPane very good for control of several GUI in an application - as alternative organization tool I use a JTree, which is used for both, selecting and organizing certain tasks or data in the application - tasks are normally done with data associated with them (that is, what an object is for), so basically a click onto a node in this JTree invokes an interface method of that object (the userObject), which is associated with this node.
Event handling should be done by the event-handling-thread only as far as possible - it is responsible for it so leave this job to it. This will give you control over the order in which the events are handled. Sometimes it needs a bit more work to obey this rule - for example communication coming from the outside (think of a chat channel for example) must be converted to an event source driven by a thread normally. As soon as it is an event source, you can leave it's event handling to the event handling thread again and problems with concurrent programming are minimized again.
It is the same with manipulating components or models of components - leave it to the event handling thread using a Runnable and SwingUtilities.invokeLater(Runnable). This way you can be sure that each manipulation is done after the other in the order you have transferred it to the event handling thread.
When you do this consequently most of your threads will idle most of the time - so give them a break using Thread.sleep(...) - not all platforms provide preemptive multitasking and this way it is garanteed, that the event handling thread will get a chance to run most of the time - which results in fast GUI update and fast event handling.
Another thing is, that you should use "divide and conquer" also within a single GUI panel - place components in subpanels and transfer the responsibility for the components in this panel to exactly these subpanels - think of a team manager which makes his employees work together. He reports up to his super manager and transfers global order from his boss into specific tasks by delegation to the components, he is managing. If you have this in mind, when you design classes, you will have less problem - each class is responsible for a certain task - define it clearly and define to whom it is reporting (its listeners) and what these listeners may be interested in.
When you design the communication structure within your hierarchy of classes (directors, managers, team managers and workers) have in mind, that the communication structure should not break the management hierarchy. A director gives global orders to a manager, which delegates several tasks to the team managers, which make their workers do what is needed. This structure makes a big company controlable by directors - the same principles can also keep control within an application.
greetings Marsian

Deliver Reports Large number of users.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for