Delivered UI Shell? Inconsistent with Beta Guide

Hi All,
I have found a BETA guide that discusses a UI Shell -- http://www.orastudy.com/oradoc/selfstu/fusion/doc.1111/e15524/ui_impl_uishell.htm.
Can't seem to see this in the various versions of Jdev that I have 11.1.4 thru to 1.2
I have tried for new updates etc, and I still only have the dynamic shell template.
Any clues or has this yet to be officially released?
Cheers,
Simo

Hi Frank, thanks for the clarification!
I guess that was a little easy...I am tipping that this MAY be a UI shell issue that I am currently experiencing ;-) and hoping that you could shed some light.
The use case is that I have implemented a version of the dynamic tabs with this shell as decribed in 'Oracle Design Patterns' best practice. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/adf/uishell-093084.html.
Within this, I am using a pageFlowScoped bean to hold the state for a dynamic dashbaord for various bounded task flows (as launched within the shell). I have defined the bean on the called task flow and not in the adfc-config, as I am looking to control multiple instances of these dashboards, and use the page flow to keep the state for the life of the task flow.
All is fine, until I refer to or display fields from a tree binding.... ie presenting a read only table or referring to this in EL. When I close a workflow and reopen, using the tab.context launcher, an error is raised: target unreachable, where the bean that I use to controll the dashboard state cannot be found. It seems as if the page is looking for an existing bean, rather than creating a new one with the creation of a new task flow instance.
It is very weird because this behavior only occurs when I present the data through a table. If I use a form it is fine, and the reopening new task flows functionality is working perfectly.
This is a convoluted problem and I probably haven't explained myself so I understand, if you can't help!
Cheers,
Simo

Similar Messages

IOS-XR 5.1.3 SP2 - %OS-RT_CHECK-3-INCONSISTENCY_DETECTED : ipv4-unicast detected inconsistency with

I'm curious if anyone else has seen this message logged after an up/down grade to 5.1.3 w/ SP2
%OS-RT_CHECK-3-INCONSISTENCY_DETECTED : ipv4-unicast detected inconsistency with 1 entries for scan-id N
We were told by TAC this is a cosmetic issue only and not to worry. However, the engineer inside me wants to know what the router is upset about and how to suppress the log message. I'd also like to ask Cisco to create a cosmetic bug fix for 5.1.3 to resolve the log message if it is indeed truly cosmetic only in nature.
Thanks!
-ben

hi Ben, the ddts is fixed in 52x forward. There is no smu planned for prior releases.
you can schedule a periodic selective clear of the log buffer via:
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG#clear log events delete [option] [field]
the logging correlator, here is a little write up on that (copy/paste from my kb)
XR nag Killer
The short version (i.e. here's the code to make it happen!)
!! enter config mode...
conf t
!! this removes the correlator so you can edit it...
no logging correlator apply rule kill-annoyances all-of-router
!!! define the rule
logging correlator rule kill-annoyances type nonstateful
timeout 600000
!!! this is the "root cause" one... make sure you pick something that happens frequently
rootcause PLATFORM ENVMON FAN_FAIL
!!! these are all the NON root cause events. this is what gets squashed along with the root cause.
!!! add things here that you want squashed.
nonrootcause
alarm PLATFORM ENVMON FAN_CLEAR
alarm PLATFORM ENVMON FANTRAY_FAIL
alarm PLATFORM ENVMON ENV_CONDITION
alarm PLATFORM ENVMON FANTRAY_CLEAR
!!! timeouts are currently maxed at ten minutes... (smu anyone?)
timeout-rootcause 600000
!!! this re-applies the correlator
logging correlator apply rule kill-annoyances all-of-router
!!! now commit the thing
commit
!!! done...
On a somewhat related note, if anyone is not already familiar with the
"logging correlator" function -- it can be used to greatly reduce the
amount of "noise" generated by all these various little things that are
broken (like single fan tray systems!)
An example config that I have on my box is as follows:
logging correlator rule fan type nonstateful
timeout 600000
rootcause PLATFORM ENVMON FAN_FAIL
nonrootcause
alarm PLATFORM ENVMON FAN_CLEAR
alarm PLATFORM ENVMON FANTRAY_FAIL
alarm PLATFORM ENVMON ENV_CONDITION
alarm PLATFORM ENVMON FANTRAY_CLEAR
timeout-rootcause 600000
logging correlator apply rule fan
all-of-router
>>
Which essentially says the following:
>>
1) a message of format "PLATFORM-ENVMON-FAN_FAIL" is a 'root cause' event.
the timeout for root cause events is set to 600000ms (ten minutes), so
no matter how many of these events I see, I will only actually throw a
syslog every ten minutes.
2) underneath this 'root cause' event are a number of 'nonrootcause'
events. If I see any of these events within the timeout specified (again,
ten minutes) of a 'root cause' I will also suppress these messages -- the
theory here is that I already know the root cause and don't want to clutter
myself up with all the side effects. In reality we're just hacking the
correlator to get rid of messages, but hey -- it works. ;-)
>>
3) this particular "correlator rule" is applied to the whole router (you
*can* do all sorts of funky stuff with where you apply it if you want).
4) in real environments the idea is to have lots of different correlators
for different events... but what I do is basically maintain a great big
list of known syslog messages that I don't want to have splattering my
screen, and the correlator gobbles them all up for me.
>>
Limitations:
>>
5) UPDATE: you can now set timeouts up to 7200000 seconds (LONG time...)
>>
6) the only really annoying part is that you have to unapply the rule
before you can edit it... so the process is "unapply rule, commit, change
rule, apply rule, commit" instead of just "change rule". But hey, it's
better than nothing.
>>
7) if you want to see the messages that got suppressed/correlated, use the
"show logging correlator buffer all-in-buffer" command -- and sit back and
be amazed at how much console bandwidth you've saved. ;-)
>>
Hope people find this helpful...
config example courtesy of LJ Wobker.
xander

ORA-00214 control file version 33705 inconsistent with file version 33703

Hi,
I have successfully installed OracleEBS 12.2.0. I have started listener. Then while starting DB i got the following error.
ORA-00214 control file '/home/oracle/data/controlfile_VIS1.ctl' version 33705 inconsistent with file '/home/oracle/data/controlfile_VIS2.ctl version 33703
I am not having backup for DB and it's files.
Please any one help me to recover this problem and to start DB
Thanks,
Selvi

Hi Selvi,
It would be better to ask this question in the RDBMS forum -
https://community.oracle.com/community/database/general_questions
This forum is for questions about connecting to non-Oracle databases from Oracle.
Regards,
Mike

"File ... already exists, but it is inconsistent with this one." error

I've previously used ALPC to profile a Zuiko 12-60 on a E520 and I had no trouble at all. I had 33 different sets of 9 pictures each, and they all merged nicely into one consistent profile. The profile worked perfectly and corrected lens distortion better than any other software I've used. Now I'm trying to profile my Nikkor 10-24 on a Nikon D7000, but as soon as I try to append the 2nd set to the 1st one (same focal length and focus distance, different aperture), I get this message: "File <filename> already exists, but it is inconsistent with this one. Please select a different location or use a different file name.".
My brother has been having this same issue and he's also using a Nikon D7000, but with a Sigma 17-70 2.8-4.0. Any ideas why this is happening? Some sort of D7000 raw conversion issue, maybe? I used ACR to convert NEF to DNG. The first profile is created and works well, though apparently not very accurate.
I tested the one profile that is saved, at 10mm and f/3.5, and it's not very good. Distortion is clearly over-corrected. The one difference between the profile I did for the Olympus and this one is that I refocused after every shot for this one (since the wide angle really throws corner focus off when you reframe it). Could this be it? If not, what else?
I'm using an A4 13x21 chart. It's enough to fill the frame with 9 shots at minimum focus distance.

I am having the same problem with my d7000. This happens regardless of software used to convert NEF files, so if I had to guess at why this is happening I would say that the d7000 maybe has a different format for its makernotes, which is where the lens information is stored, and the lens profile creator doesn't read it.
Here's what happened when I tried to profile my 50mm f1.8 nikkor: I took 9 pictures at f1.8 and nine at f2.8. The profiling worked fine on both. So I ran it first on the f1.8 set, and saved it. Did the same for the f2.8 set and tried to save it, but it wouldn't allow me to append the file to the existing one, giving me the "inconsistent" error discussed here. I then save the second profile separately.
I opened both on windows notepad, and this is the lensID inconsistency already discussed here:
The profile I did with the f1.8 set had this line in it:
<stCamera:LensID>76</stCamera:LensID>
And the profile I did with the f2.8 set had this line:
<stCamera:LensID>179</stCamera:LensID>

Indexes: Inconsistent with DDIC source

Hi, i have an issue in the DB02, i have a message that missing some index, when i check the se14 i see the error
Database object for /BI0/E0BPM_C01 is inconsistent: (Secondary indexes)
and Indexes: Inconsistent with DDIC source
on the database the index exist, but in Dictionary do not exist
with the TX se14 I try to "activate and adjust database" with Save data but the issue still continue
any idea or support is welcome
regards

when i try to create a index with the TX SE11 i can't
i obtain the message "Index ID 0 is reserved for the primary index"
regards

This bundle is invalid - New apps and app updates submitted to the App Store must be built with public (GM) versions of Xcode 5.1.1 or higher and iOS 7 SDK. Do not submit apps built with beta software

Does anyone can help me on this issue from Apple Developer?
This bundle is invalid - New apps and app updates submitted to the App Store must be built with public (GM) versions of Xcode 5.1.1 or higher and iOS 7 SDK. Do not submit apps built with beta software
Is there a new Flash CC - Adobe AIR SDK to solve this?
Best

Looks like there's some hope:
Re: App Store must be built with Xcode 5.1.1 or later !

How can i replace parts of my laptop with better parts

I got a HP pavilion G6 . And i dont have the money to buy a new pc, so my question is, can i replace some parts with better ones, so i can have a better game expierience. And are there ways to boost my FPS?
Thanks
Niels

Nielsdg wrote:
I got a HP pavilion G6 . And i dont have the money to buy a new pc, so my question is, can i replace some parts with better ones, so i can have a better game expierience. And are there ways to boost my FPS?
Thanks
Niels
NO. You will have to spend a good deal of money to get a high FPS machine and those aren't cheap to get.
I am a Volunteer to help others on here-not a HP employee.
Replies aren't online 24/7 because of Time Zone differences.
Remember in this Day and Age of Computing the Internet is Knowledge at your fingertips if you choose understand it. -2015-

Error occurred in deployment step 'Activate Features': Feature with Id 'GUID' is not installed in this farm, and cannot be added to this scope.

Really frustrated!!! Using SP 2010 with VS 2010. Created a simple project with just 1 elements.xml file for adding 2 columns. Scope of the feature is "Site". When I right click and deploy it gives below error.
Error occurred in deployment step 'Activate Features': Feature with Id 'GUID' is not installed in this farm, and cannot be added to this scope.
If I look at the CA, I see the wsp is installed but NOT deployed (Status = "Not Deployed", "Deployed To" = None). I have checked the GUID in the error and its my feature id.
Please let me know what is going wrong here! Thanks for your help.
Please mark as 'Propose as Answer' or 'Vote' as appropriate.

Hi Sagir,
Try to check the GUID in error message to see if it’s in Feature1.Template.xml file.
For more information, please refer to
http://markviky.blogspot.com/2010/09/error-while-activating-feature.html
http://alltoft.wordpress.com/2011/06/13/sp2010-error-occurred-in-deployment-step-activate-features/
Best Regards.
Kelly Chen
TechNet Community Support

How do I stop the ruler from moving along with my guide line as I move it?

Hello everyone,
I am new to muse and may well be missing the obvious here, but I have a little problem, which until it is solved is a big road block to me.
I am trying to move a guide lower on the page and can not do that because the left ruler is moving along with the guide!
How do I lock the ruler itself, so the guide can be moved to a different position on the ruler?
Totally weird. I have tried searching "locking rulers" both in this site and in google, but got no results at all. I don't think the rulers are supposed to move in the first place, so am worried that nobody out there may have an answer to this.
So I am stuck for now & I can't finish my project unless this is solved.
Thanks for reading,
Pat

I would need more details for this, as you have mentioned rulers move ? Are you referring to rulers on page in design ?
You can move a guide lower down the page , ruler marks will be displayed on ruler but that will not stop you moving the guides.
What happens if you uncheck rulers from top view options ?
Thanks,
Sanjit

Inconsistency with document splitting

Dear All,
I have activated Document splitting option after posting few documents----open itmes. After document splitting is activated now i cannot clear those line items which were posted before document splitting was activated.
Is there any way to remove this inconsistency with the old documents. Any program to be run...or any other solution.
Please help to resolve the issue.
Sap Frido.

hi,
Is there any program which removes this inconsistency. As we have program to run the inconsistency in witholding tax.
Thnaks and regards
Sap frido

IS 10.x Flash compatible with beta Firefox 4.x ?

Hello,
Would like to know if current flash engine is good to go with beta 4.x Firefox? Not running the beta yet, using 3.6.9 and it still has an "
Potentially vulnerable plugins:" message always shows up in the browser for 3.6.9 for the Acrobat plugin no matter how many times I update it. Figured trying the new browser would change things. Just wanting to know if there are any issues before I spend the time.
Thank you,
John
[email protected]
http://www.elinenstore.com

Message is on main update for plug-ins results:
"Adobe PDF Plug-In For Firefox and Netscape "9.3.3"" > Outdated version > Update
Crazy cause its the most recent rev. I've done manual installs over current plugin and Adobe Download Manager and same issue.
Thanks,
John
[email protected]
http://www.elinenstore.com

How to deliver MM02 to user with only Bin Location editable.

My user wishes to have access to change only the Bin Location field in MM02. How can we achieve this? or in other words how can we deliver MM02 to user with only the Bin Location field editable.
My basis guy sees a possibility if we can some how provide the authorization objects of all the fields of MM02.Shall that be a practical approach. if yes, what is the way of finding the authorization objects?
Regards,
Alok.

Hi,
You can create a transaction variant in SHD0 for MM02.
[Transaction variants|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/7d/f639f8015111d396480000e82de14a/content.htm] simplify transaction flow by:
-Inserting default values in fields
-Hiding and changing the ready for input status of fields
-Hiding and changing the attributes of table control columns
-Hiding individual menu functions
-Hiding entire screens
Transaction variants are actually made up of a series of screen variants. The field values and field attributes for each screen in a transaction variant are stored in screen variants. Each variant is assigned to a transaction. Variants may, however, contain values for screens in multiple transactions, if transaction flow makes this necessary. The transaction the variant is assigned to serves as its initial transaction, whenever you start the variant.
Both client-specific and cross-client transaction variants exist. Screen variants are always cross-client; they may, however, be assigned to a client-specific transaction.
A specific namespace has been designated for cross-client transaction variants and screen variants and they are both automatically attached to the Change and Transport System. Client-specific transaction variants can be transported manually.
Transaction and screen variants may be created for all dialog and reporting transactions. However, there are certain restrictions that apply to their use, depending on how their corresponding transactions have been realized internally.
Transaction variants may not be created for transactions already containing pre-defined parameters (parameter transactions and variant transactions).
The following sections contain additional information on how to create and maintain transaction variants:
Maintenance
Additional Functions
Transport
Regards,
Srilatha.

Business Partner with ID GUID is not an employee - HR Replication

Hi All,
We are on SRM 5.0 Server 5.5. Our SRM Org structure comes from R/3. We did an initial replication and everything worked. I am now manually trying to replicate selected positions and persons, and this is not working properly.
The position and person comes across however in PPOSA_BBP the central person is not automatically linked to the position. When I run HRALXSYNC on the CP, I get an error "Business Partner with ID <GUID> is not an employee". I have checked the BP and it is an employee; in transaction PP01 there is an Org. assignment (0001) to the position and org unit. I have checked the IDOCs and the relationship A008 seems to be coming across.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to what else I can check?
Thanks,
Paula.

Hi
Please go through this ->
The CP object is a technical object and represents the natural person. The CP is not transferred in the scenario "SRM standalone with ALE integration of an HR system". This means that the CP in the HR system and the CP in SRM systems are different objects. The number of the CPs in the SRM system in this case is not significant, but when the CP is created, the system tries to assign the number of the first personal number (contract) to the object.
See related SAP OSS Notes, which will definitely help ->
Note 920185 - SRM 5.0: No CP<->BP consistence check in BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE
Note 763403 Assign existing (SU01) users to (ext.) employees
Note 875015 No attributes found for service agent
Note 309909 - R/3 HR connection: Link user / position
Note 1046808 - Business partner validation
Note 934372 - SRM/CRM: HR integration for business partner - new features
Also see this ->
During the business partner replication from purchasing systems to SUS, the following error occurs in an XI interface: "An exception has occured. E:R11: 124 - Business partner with GUID &1 does not exist"
Note 726212 - SRM40-SUS: Business partner - correction for SP00
Related Notes
Note 922181 - SRM-SUS: Mail notification not send from 'BBP_SUS_BP_ADM'
Note 849217 - SUS-MM: Vendor replication leads to error
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Intersect bug with Smart Guides

The December updated didn't fix the intersect bug with Smart Guides. Previously it would snap to the intersection of paths and show you the intersect point. With CC it does nothing. Just passes straight over. Would you please fix this. Having to use AI CS5 just so I can work on the maps I need to produce. Thanks.
Anyone know how a work around/fix to this until we get it fixed by the AI guys?

Never mind... a little more digging and found the solution in this thread:
Add anchor point tool not snapping to intersection point

Product version inconsistent with software components

Hi,
after upgrading our sandbox from 4.6C to ERP 6.0 EHP4 SP06 i've changed the product assignment in SMSY and fetched the new data using "Read System Data Remote". Now there are two problems:
1.) Read System Data Remote shows error message S:032:000 trying to fetch data using RFC. No more explanations or long text. Although data is been read and updated and RFC test connection is ok.
2.) The related system shows exclamation mark "Product version inconsistent with software components". The product version is SAP ERP 6.0, Product Instance is SAP ECC Server. Now i tried "Change Product Assignment" and "Clean-Up Inconsistencies". This results in a list of "Inconsistent Database Assignments" like "Product: SAP ERP" and "Product Instance: SAP SRM-Server". Nothing i can change here. I'm confused as i haven't defined SAP SRM-Server anywhere just SAP ECC-Server.
Any ideas about 1.) or 2.)
It seems to me that Solution Manager doesn't make life easier in the first.
Thanks.

Miguel,
i have checked note 1165438 but can't see how this should help. The technical usage is correct and there is only one specified which is ECC / Central Applications. Still SMSY complains about SAP SRM-Server and more.
Let me say that the system was defined as 4.6C before the upgrade and that we used Solution Manager to download all required packages for ERP 6.0 EHP4 SP06 which worked fine. The problem is as said before that after changing the product version to ERP 6.0 there are inconsistencies shown on the product assignment page (inconsistent database assignment) for SAP SRM-Server, SRM-Catalog, cProject Suite, Workforce Management, E-Recruiting, NW-Business Intelligence, NW-Process Integration, SEM, SRM-Server ECC AddOn, SRM Catalog Content, NW Mobile Infrastructure, FSCM-FSCM Server (ABAP), Application Platform-IPC and Learning Sol-Frontend ABAP. Never heard about them nor specified them anywhere.

Delivered UI Shell? Inconsistent with Beta Guide

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for