Delivery Notification: Delivery has been delayed

I'm not getting only "Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed" but no "Delivery Notification: Delivery has been delayed"
please help me on this.
Chinthake
# /opt/sun/comms/messaging64/sbin/imsimta qm
qm.maint> sum
Queued Queued
Channel Messages = Active + Delayed Size (Mb)
process 0 0 0 0.0
process_dsn 0 0 0 0.0
reprocess 0 0 0 0.0
tcp_intranet 0 0 0 0.0
tcp_local 60147 60147 0 322.8
tcp_notify 6267 6267 0 39.0
tcp_yahoo 790 790 0 10.5
Totals 67204 67204 0 372.3
qm.maint> top tcp_notify
Building a list of message files to scan from the queue directory tree...
The list will contain only messages from channels matching "tcp_notify"
Scanning 6268 message files...
Scanned 6268 message files in 12.9481 seconds (484.09 messages/second)
Top 20 Subject: header lines which occur 2 or more times
Count Subject
====== ======================================================================
6178 Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed
qm.maint>
# /opt/sun/comms/messaging64/sbin/imsimta version
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 64bit)
libimta.so 6.3-5.02 (built 17:38:05, Oct 12 2007; 64bit)
SunOS whale1 5.10 Generic_118833-33 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240
18-Apr-2008 10:51:44.86 tcp_local tcp_local E 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected]
18-Apr-2008 10:56:02.29 tcp_local Q 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
18-Apr-2008 12:39:56.56 tcp_local Q 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
18-Apr-2008 14:36:56.22 tcp_local Q 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
18-Apr-2008 16:46:57.58 tcp_local Q 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
18-Apr-2008 21:18:53.01 tcp_local Q 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
19-Apr-2008 01:22:37.67 tcp_local Q 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
19-Apr-2008 05:26:21.68 tcp_local Q 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
19-Apr-2008 13:45:08.09 tcp_local Q 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
19-Apr-2008 22:08:13.46 tcp_local Q 2 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
20-Apr-2008 06:11:57.68 tcp_local Q 2 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
20-Apr-2008 14:46:20.35 tcp_local Q 2 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
20-Apr-2008 23:29:46.72 tcp_local Q 2 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
21-Apr-2008 07:37:34.24 tcp_local Q 2 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
21-Apr-2008 11:39:57.29 tcp_local Q 2 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
21-Apr-2008 13:26:22.90 tcp_local Q 3 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
21-Apr-2008 21:44:28.30 tcp_local Q 3 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] TCP active open: Failed connect() 203.115.0.139:25 Error: Connection timed out
# cat imta.cnf
! IMTA configuration file
! part I : rewrite rules
! Domain Rewrite Rules.
! Uncomment this line to use domain rewrite rules
! from the configuration file instead of the domain database.
! Please refer to the iMS documentation for details.
!<IMTA_TABLE:domains.rules
! Rules to select local users
$* $A$E$F$U%[email protected]
whale1.slt.lk $U%[email protected]
siore.com $U%[email protected]
yahoo.com [email protected]
! ims-ms
.ims-ms-daemon $U%$H.ims-ms-daemon@ims-ms-daemon
! lmtp
!.lmtp $U%$H@lmtpcs-daemon
! lmtpn
!.lmtpn $U%$H@lmtpcn-daemon
! native
.native-daemon $U%$H.native-daemon@native-daemon
! pipe
.pipe-daemon $U%$H.pipe-daemon@pipe-daemon
<IMTA_TABLE:internet-dsn.rules
! tcp_local
! Rules for top level internet domains
<IMTA_TABLE:internet.rules
! tcp_intranet
! Do mapping lookup for internal IP addresses
[] $E$R${INTERNAL_IP,$L}$U%[$L]@tcp_intranet-daemon
.siore.com $U%$H.siore.com@tcp_intranet-daemon
* $U%$&0.siore.com
! reprocess
reprocess $U%reprocess.whale1.slt.lk@reprocess-daemon
reprocess.whale1.slt.lk $U%reprocess.whale1.slt.lk@reprocess-daemon
! process
process $U%process.whale1.slt.lk@process-daemon
process.whale1.slt.lk $U%process.whale1.slt.lk@process-daemon
! defragment
defragment $U%defragment.whale1.slt.lk@defragment-daemon
defragment.whale1.slt.lk $U%defragment.whale1.slt.lk@defragment-daemon
! conversion
conversion $U%conversion.whale1.slt.lk@conversion-daemon
conversion.whale1.slt.lk $U%conversion.whale1.slt.lk@conversion-daemon
! bitbucket
bitbucket $U%bitbucket.whale1.slt.lk@bitbucket-daemon
bitbucket.whale1.slt.lk $U%bitbucket.whale1.slt.lk@bitbucket-daemon
! deleted
deleted-daemon $U%$H@deleted-daemon
.deleted-daemon $U%$H@deleted-daemon
! inactive
inactive-daemon $U%$H@inactive-daemon
.inactive-daemon $U%$H@inactive-daemon
! hold
hold-daemon $U%$H@hold-daemon
.hold-daemon $U%$H@hold-daemon
! part II : channel blocks
!defaults notices 1 2 4 7 copywarnpost copysendpost postheadonly noswitchchannel immnonurgent maxjobs 7 defaulthost siore.com siore.com
!defaults notices 1 2 4 nowarnpost nosendpost postheadonly noswitchchannel immnonurgent maxjobs 7 defaulthost siore.com siore.com logging notificationchannel process_dsn dispositionchannel process_dsn
defaults notices 1 2 4 copywarnpost nosendpost postheadonly noswitchchannel immnonurgent maxjobs 7 defaulthost siore.com siore.com logging notificationchannel process_dsn dispositionchannel process_dsn
! delivery channel to local /var/mail store
l subdirs 20 viaaliasrequired maxjobs 7
whale1.slt.lk
! ims-ms
ims-ms defragment subdirs 20 notices 1 7 14 21 28 backoff "pt5m" "pt10m" "pt30m" "pt1h" "pt2h" "pt4h" maxjobs 2 pool IMS_POOL fileinto $U+$S@$D
ims-ms-daemon
! native
native defragment subdirs 20 maxjobs 1
native-daemon
! pipe
pipe single defragment subdirs 20
pipe-daemon
! tcp_local
!tcp_local smtp mx single_sys remotehost inner switchchannel identnonenumeric subdirs 20 maxjobs 7 pool SMTP_POOL maytlsserver maysaslserver saslswitchchannel tcp_auth missingrecipientpolicy 0 loopcheck
tcp_local smtp mx single_sys remotehost inner switchchannel identnonenumeric subdirs 20 maxjobs 7 pool SMTP_POOL maytlsserver maysaslserver saslswitchchannel tcp_auth missingrecipientpolicy 0 loopcheck disconnectbadcommandlimit 5 mailfromdnsverify
tcp-daemon
! tcp_intranet
tcp_intranet smtp mx single_sys subdirs 20 dequeue_removeroute maxjobs 7 pool SMTP_POOL maytlsserver allowswitchchannel saslswitchchannel tcp_auth missingrecipientpolicy 4
tcp_intranet-daemon
! tcp_submit
tcp_submit submit smtp mx single_sys mustsaslserver maytlsserver missingrecipientpolicy 4
tcp_submit-daemon
! tcp_auth
tcp_auth smtp mx single_sys mustsaslserver missingrecipientpolicy 4
tcp_auth-daemon
! tcp_tas
tcp_tas smtp mx single_sys allowswitchchannel mustsaslserver maytlsserver deliveryflags 2
tcp_tas-daemon
! tcp_lmtpss (LMTP server - store)
!tcp_lmtpss lmtp flagtransfer
!tcp_lmtpss-daemon
! tcp_lmtpcs (LMTP client - store)
!tcp_lmtpcs defragment lmtp port 225 nomx single_sys subdirs 20 maxjobs 7 pool SMTP_POOL dequeue_removeroute
!lmtpcs-daemon
! tcp_notify
!tcp_notify smtp mx single_sys remotehost inner subdirs 20 maxjobs 10 pool NOTIFY_POOL backoff "pt4h" "pt8h" notices 1 loopcheck
tcp_notify smtp mx single_sys remotehost inner subdirs 20 maxjobs 10 pool NOTIFY_POOL notices 1 backoff "pt4h" "pt8h" nosendpost loopcheck
tcp_notify-daemon
!tcp_yahoo
tcp_yahoo smtp mx single_sys remotehost inner switchchannel identnonenumeric subdirs 20 maxjobs 30 threaddepth 32 pool SMTP_POOL maysaslserver saslswitchchannel tcp_auth missingrecipientpolicy 0 recipientlimit 125
!tcp_yahoo-daemon
yahoo.com
! reprocess
reprocess
reprocess-daemon
! process
process
process-daemon
! defragment
defragment
defragment-daemon
! conversion
conversion
conversion-daemon
! bitbucket
bitbucket
bitbucket-daemon
! deleted
deleted
deleted-daemon
! inactive
inactive
inactive-daemon
! hold
hold
hold-daemon
!process_dsn
process_dsn
process_dsn-daemon

jay_plesset wrote:
The notification messages are generated by the "return" job, that's normally scheduled to run nightly. If you're not receiving/sending these, you will need to check that that return job is in fact getting run.Adding to Jay's comment, I set up the same configuration you are using and the notifications of Delayed email were working fine:
26-Apr-2008 00:30:00.82 tcp_local process_dsn E 1 rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] tcp-daemon.server.aus.sun.com ''
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:30:00 +1000 (EST)
From: [email protected]
Subject: Delivery Notification: Delivery has been delayedI am using the following CONVERSIONS mapping table entry:
CONVERSIONS
IN-CHAN=process_dsn;OUT-CHAN=tcp_*;CONVERT Yes,Channel=tcp_notifyRegards,
Shane.

Similar Messages

Configurable system message No Goods Receipt/Delivery has been posted

When user add a new AR Invoice or AP Invoice without creating prior to it
Goods Receipt or Delivery document system always displays message: 'No
Goods Receipt/Delivery has been posted. Continue?'. This message should
be configurable as for users which don't use Delivery or Goods Receipt PO is useless. User should decide if he or she wants to display it or not. For most customers clicking on this message is a huge wasting of time as it displays at every sales or purchase operation.

Hi
If you use Shipping notification then you have to create inbound delivery VL31n and do the PGR in inbound delivery VL32N itself.
Incase of scheduling agreement schedule lines you have to make sure the following
1) Schedule line delivery date shoud be todays date or in the past
2) Schedule must be released by using message type based on the type of schedule ( Normal, JIT or forecast)
Hope it helps
Thanks/Karthik

I cannot cancel the goods issue because the delivery has been archived

Dear Gurus,
I have cancelled the MB1C goods receipt but I cannot cancel the goods issue because the delivery has been archived. Is it possible for you to fix this batch record any other way ?
Early resposne would be appreciated !
Thanks,
Rafiq

Dear Friends,
Can u please help me out of this issue
Thanks,
Rafiq

No quality notification type has been defined for inspection type 89

Hi
When I am creating a manual inspection lot and want to create a quality notification it gives me this error "No quality notification type has been defined for inspection type 89" where do I assign the notifications to the inspection lot.???
I want to know where do I configure it??
Regards
Suresh

Hi
Path for assigning the Qualtiy notification type to Qualtiy inspection type:
SPRO--> Qualtiy Mangement --> Qualtiy inspection --> Inspection lot creation -->
Maintain Inspection types.
Select the inspection type and goto details screen
You can find notification type field in the details.Give the value and Save.
Regards
Ramakrishna

Laptop has been delayed?

I orderred a laptop back on the 5th. it said that the pick up date for in store was the 13th. on the 13th i get an email telling me it has been delayed and to wait for an undefinide amount of time. I am just kinda looking for a time frame or what has happened? was it shipped, is it in transit? or is it on back order? just kinda want to know So i can try to plan for it, i live a good distance from the best buy an hour one way.

No one here can readily answer your question. Most of those who read and respond in these forums do not work for Best Buy (myself included). My guess is that there was a delay in shipment from the supplier, and that as of your date there was not yet a clear answer when more would be shipped to Best Buy.
If you find my post useful or informative, please click the icon below with the plus sign and star to give kudos. Thank you!

Delivery has been locked, cant unlock it

Hi,
I have been programmatically locking and unlocking deliveries with the standard deque and enqueue function modules. Suddenly my program got hung and i had terminate the session with Ctrl + Alt + Del
After i logged in again i again chose the option to terminate other session. However my delivery has remained locked if i go to VL02N. How can i fix this problem. Is there someway i can kill some process?
Will award points for the right answer. Thanks for reading

Run t-code SM12.
Enter your UserId and delete the locked delivery on the corresponding screen.

How to find the date on which notification task has been released?

Hi All,
I am an ABAPer, I have a functional doubt. I have got a functional Spec's for which I have to create a report.
Here, I need to retrieve the field for "Date when the notification RECV task has been released".
I have checked and analysed that the data has to be pulled from 'QMEL' and 'AFIH' tables. I have the notification number with me, I need to pull the "Date when the notification RECV task has been released", there are a lot of date fields in QMEL and AFIH tables, I am able to identify the creation date for particular notification. I need to get the release date?
Could someone please help me, what is the field for release date for the notification in these tables (OR) please let me know the transaction be which we can identify the release date for notification task, I'll get the field name from there.
Please help, I dont have any functional consultants around me.
Thanks,
Vishal.

There are no fields for date for release of notification task in these tables.
Please help!!
Edited by: Vishal Saxena on Jun 15, 2009 8:22 PM

Process order cancellation or reversal after sales order delivery has b

hi,
here we got one issue as user made mistake in assigning profit center in the material master of a material. when the process order execution is over, delivery has been done for a sales order. then user came to know that documents generated in the profit center assigned in the material master. but actually another profit center is supposed to be assigned.
now can we do something to change in PP to effect the profit center documents in this stage.
can any one of you suggest good solution, i will be thankful to you
regards

Hi
yes you can revoke closing of process order
Go to Cor3 go to process order header
process order >>> functions >> restrict processing >>> Revoke closing
again go to Process order >> functions >> restrict processing >> revoke Tech. completion
after tht you can change your profit center
Please reward points
Sunil

Apple has reportedly delayed the release of iOS 5.0.2

Apple has reportedly delayed the release of iOS 5.0.2, German-language technology blog Macerkopf.de said on Monday. Rumors surfaced last week suggesting that Apple was preparing to release the update, which is expected to address poor battery life with iOS 5, out of the door before the end of this week. Macerkopf.de said iOS 5.0.2 has been delayed to fix “address-based memory leaks,” or bugs that cause apps to consume memory without releasing resources once they are no longer needed. A new release date for iOS 5.0.2 has reportedly not yet been scheduled.

I saw it when i searching the web again today Apple has reportedly delayed the release of iOS 5.0.2

Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed

I keep receiving a "Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed" message about a message that I apparently sent 4 years ago. How can I stop it?
Also please see notes at bottom of post!
thanks and regards
vats3
Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed
1 Attachment
This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
Message-id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: {edited for privacy}
To: addressees deleted for this forum entry
Subject: Re: ACC Ladies Night Out
Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
Recipient address: {edited for privacy}
Reason: SMTP transmission failure has occurred
Diagnostic code: smtp;554 5.7.9 Message not accepted for policy reasons. See http://postmaster.yahoo.com/errors/postmaster-28.html
Remote system: dns;mta6.am0.yahoodns.net (TCP|206.46.173.19|47987|63.250.192.46|25) (mta1640.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ESMTP ready)
Reporting-MTA: dns;vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (tcp_yahoo-daemon)
Arrival-date: Fri, 16 May 2014 10:29:51 -0500 (CDT)
Original-recipient: rfc822;{edited for privacy}
Final-recipient: rfc822;{edited for privacy}
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0 (SMTP transmission failure has occurred)
Remote-MTA: dns;mta6.am0.yahoodns.net
(TCP|206.46.173.19|47987|63.250.192.46|25)
(mta1640.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ESMTP ready)
Diagnostic-code: smtp;554 5.7.9 Message not accepted for policy reasons. See
http://postmaster.yahoo.com/errors/postmaster-28.html
1. Hamburger Hamlet
2. Clydes
3. Rio Grande
The rest of the original messge was deleted by vats3 for this forum and also forum software gave me the following:
"Your post has been changed because invalid HTML was found in the message body. The invalid HTML has been removed. Please review the message and submit the message when you are satisfied."
could it be that the removed html was causing the problem?
About Us | Store Locator | Support | Site Map | Send Feedback | Careers | Verizon Think

If you are using a mail client, make sure the failed message is not in your outbox. If it is in there, the mail client will keep trying to send the email until you remove it.

Item has been on delivery since 06/29/15

Hello, I have patiently been waiting for my order to arrive since it was placed on 06/28/15. The processing to initial shipping was great very fast. It was shipped originally with UPS but with the 4th of July holiday it caused the item to be delayed until next business day. I don't have an issue with that and it's normal. However, the item switched carrier the following business day on July 6th. The item departed Richmond California via USPS to my location the island of Mililani, Hawaii. I have been tracking it daily and the USPS tracking site says the same thing "Your item arrived at our USPS facility in RICHMOND, CA 94804 on July 6, 2015 at 7:25 pm. The item is currently in transit to the destination." I waited and waited then finally called USPS and spoke to a rep. He advised that it's being shipped.....why in the heck would they ship it??? I just recently had my cars shipped and it took about 2 weeks. This item shipped on the 6th, well that's what the site says and it's been 2 weeks. Technically 3 weeks the item out on shipping going on 4. What am I to do here? I know one thing is just wait and wait and hope that it gets here by the end of this month. You advertise 5-8 business day if I remember well it's been more than that. Even with the change in carrier it has been more than that. Please help with a solution. Thank you, Siksauce

Hello Siksauce,
After buying something online, I constantly check the order’s status to see when I can anticipate it to arrive. This is so I can keep an eye out for the delivery. As it’s almost been a month since you reportedly placed the order, it’s understandable why you would be concerned about where you order may be, even after allowing an appropriate delay due to the most recent holiday weekend. I truly apologize for any frustration this unexpected shipping delay may be causing.
If an online order is reported to us as missing, we should be contacting the mail carrier associated with your purchase to file a claim on your behalf. After reviewing your online order, I do see that while USPS notates the order is in transit. While this means it isn’t necessarily missing, I was able to confirm their website hasn’t updated since July 6th. Because of this, I’ve asked them to open an investigation to see if your order may be located, and we ask for eight business days to look into this.
Having said this, please know I’ve sent you a private message to discuss this matter further. You may view it by logging into the forum and clicking on the envelope icon in the upper right-hand corner of the page.
Thank you for posting,

Delivery Document has been created - showing the status of Being Processed.

Hi All.
I am facing the following typical problem.
1. Sales order has been created - showing the status of COMPLETED.
2. Delivery Document has been created - showing the status of Being Processed.
3. Goods Issue document created successfully- showing status as COMPLETE
4. Billing Document has created successfully - showing the status as COMPLETED.
5. Customer Account got updated properly.
Query: Despite of completion of SO, DELIVERY, GOODS ISSUED, AND BILLING DOCUMENT u2013 and accounting document is cleared why the outbound Delivery document status is showing as BEING PROCESSED.
If I go T-code Vlo3n see document flow
Delivery 5080789885 being processed.
Go to VF03 document flow also it is showing
Delivery 5080789885 being processed.
Aditya

Hi ALL,
Further to my query I would like to clarify the following:
It is happening since 2004 all Bom components status (Delivery being processed) all the BOM main items header status is showing completed.
It not impacting the business, but suddenly user raise query SO, DELIVERY, GOODS ISSUED, AND BILLING DOCUMENT completed why still delivery showing as being processed.
1. I have checked at SO level -- all the line items were delivered. ie: delivery, goods issue, billing completed.
2. I checked the Header Level data completed and Item Level data being processed.
3. If I look into the each item level also it is showing as being processed.
4. Even the SALES ORDER HEADER LEVEL showing the status of Completed.
5. Removed credit check in delivery.
The only issue is OUTBOUND DELIVERY DOCUMENT: Status alone it is showing as ' Being Processed' -- surprisingly!
Aditya.

Delivery Reports, Mail Control: Safe handle has been closed

When i try to open Delivery reports from mail control in exchange i get the following error page, i included the stack trace to help make this easier to track down the problem
Safe handle has been closed
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.ObjectDisposedException: Safe handle has been closed
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[ObjectDisposedException: Safe handle has been closed]
System.Runtime.InteropServices.SafeHandle.DangerousAddRef(Boolean& success) +0
Microsoft.Win32.Win32Native.GetTokenInformation(SafeTokenHandle TokenHandle, UInt32 TokenInformationClass, SafeLocalAllocHandle TokenInformation, UInt32 TokenInformationLength, UInt32& ReturnLength) +0
System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.GetTokenInformation(SafeTokenHandle tokenHandle, TokenInformationClass tokenInformationClass) +147
System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.get_User() +103
Microsoft.Exchange.Management.ControlPanel.CanaryExtensions.GetUserUniqueKey(HttpContext context) +95
Microsoft.Exchange.Management.ControlPanel.CanaryExtensions.SendCanary(HttpContext context) +101
Microsoft.Exchange.Management.ControlPanel.RbacModule.Application_PostAuthenticateRequest(Object sender, EventArgs e) +89
System.Web.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +92
System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +165
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP

Hi,
From the error description, please make sure that all the services Exchange needed are running at first. What's more, I recommend you increase timeout for ECP and then check the result.
Here is a thread about increasing timeout for ECP for your reference:
Cannot open edit groups from ECP
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/c57f40eb-7218-4a48-9efa-8fb687741d54/cannot-open-edit-groups-from-ecp?forum=exchangesvrclients
Hope this can be helpful to you.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

SMQ2 Error: Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely) in ECC

Hi All,
I am processing an Outbound Scenario..everything is fine until SMQ2 shows an error in ECC system. SMQ2 shows me the following error:
Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)
Message no. VL609
My outbound delivery which was distributed to EWM system has overall picking status as blank (Not relevant for picking).
Our system is recently upgraded to EhP6, since then we are seeing this issue. Interestingly VL01NO (Delivery without reference to Order) works properly.
Other ECC-EWM integration settings are fine. Delivery Type and Item Category also look good.
I could not be able to find any OSS Note relevant to this situation.
Could you anyone help me.
Thanks
Mahesh.

Further what I see in this Outbound Scenario in EWM is when I am creating Outbound Delivery meant for EWM system with ref. to Sales Order, "Picking" tab shows EWM WHN but also shows Overall WM status as "Transfer Order Required" which is not correct.
If I remove Storage Location and re-enter then Over all WM status and Over all Picking status fields come as blank. But after all EWM processing, SMQ2 queue (FM: BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC) fails with error
Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)
Message no. VL609.
Any thoughts?
Thanks
Mahesh

Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)

Hello SDNers,
I have a Batch program that is calling VL02n for Delievry Picking ,Pcking & PGI....
This batch program runs in Background
For Some Delivery it is giving this Error Message "Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)"
...But When i run the same program in foreground delivery got Processed Well.
CAN U PLS HELP ME
>Why this Happening
>In what scenarion we genearally get this message(we dnt have TO Confirm Step in our Process)
>even i Analyze the Program of VL02n ...This message is not there
From Where this message is comming
Thx in advance
PLS RPLY ASAP

After reading again through your messages, I understand that you are doing both PICK and PGI in single update BDC call to VL02N.
This is NOT correct way to do this, as this does not ensure that PICK values are committed first and then only PGI is attempted. We did face similar problems and have solved it by separating PICK and PGI in to two calls separated by COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
I would suggest you to split your BDC into two calls. One which does only PICK and save and then followed by COMMIT WORK AND WAIT and then followed by another which does PGI and save. This should avoid the problem altogether.
Why it is not happening in foreground mode is it does not happen so quickly as in background. Even a split second can make a difference, that is why I would want you to split up both PICK and PGI update in two separate CALL TRANSACTION VL02N
I am not sure if it would help to know where the "Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)" message is raised, as it is raised withing SAPs PGI routines, and it is mandatory that ONLY picked values are used for PGI.
I can only say that the message is given under id VL and no 609, it should be embedded somewhere in the PGI call, why don't you try to PGI without picking and put a watchpoint SY-MSGNO = 609

Delivery Notification: Delivery has been delayed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for