Deploy problem - CSS and overall look different on development machine

Hi.
My ADF app looks nice on my development machine. However, when I deploy it to weblogic server, CSS or something seems to be missing (for example, I lost nice textfield look)
Did I forget to turn on some deployment setting?
BR
Edited by: user509804 on 22.4.2011 12:54

chk for all the files...it seems u hv missed out on some css

Similar Messages

Pantone Bridge and Solid looks different on screen

Why the same Pantone Coated colour looks different on screen between the Bridge palette and the Solid palette. If I compare the same colour on the 2 printed coated palettes, they look the same

Thank you so much for responding! Here are answers & below screenshot of my Distiller settings:
Platform = Windows
Frame version = 8
Rendering workflow = I print to .ps and then distill to PDF.
What settings in Distiller? I tried the "Tag all images for color management" in Distiller with sRGB selected as the color model, but it still came out lime---however, when I chose "Convert All Colors to CMYK" it kept the green color BUT then greyed out my images!!! I have attached a screenshot of the settings---can you see it?
sRGB = The artist had no idea was sRGB was (he is not really helpful at all...).
Any suggestions on how to get my images back...? Thanks so much.

Deploy PetStore Webapps and EJBs to different tiers

Hi,
Basically, the PetStore example deploys JSP/Web/EJBs to one node in one petstore.ear.
I want to seperate the Web apps and EJBs to different nodes that running Weblogic
by re-packaging the ear file to get a war file and ejb ear file. I deployed this
war file to one node and ejb ear to another node. Is this the right approach?
If so, how the JSP knows that the EJBs are in different node now?
Thanks,
Cathy

Hi,
Basically, the PetStore example deploys JSP/Web/EJBs to one node in one petstore.ear.
I want to seperate the Web apps and EJBs to different nodes that running Weblogic
by re-packaging the ear file to get a war file and ejb ear file. I deployed this
war file to one node and ejb ear to another node. Is this the right approach?
If so, how the JSP knows that the EJBs are in different node now?
Thanks,
Cathy

Why does 44k and 88k look different?

hi,
ive been using some 88k files for high qual recording, now i want all my files at 44k, so i convert them all, but looking the wave overview the 'level' appears to have dropped to nearly 50% of what it was for each file.
is this just a visual artefact of the way logic shows sample rates, it doesnt sound any quieter.

although the sounds are identical in level shown in any level meter i have.....they 'look' different on screen.
the 88k>44k convert is at the top compared to the original 88k file below it.....this seems to be a naormal artefact as this often happens when i use pitch time machine to change some samples' speeds......

Saving files in PS and they look different in Bridge

I am opening files from Bridge into PS CC that have been altered in ACR recently, making changes (cropping, tonal values inc exposure, one with a Curve adjustment and layer mask for further control) and saving them to another folder under the same directory/folder. When I go back to Bridge the image either shows no changes or it's lighter and looks like I've made some very distructive corrections. Opening it again in PS and it looks perfectly okay. Windows 7 platform. What can be going on? Thank you in advance for your help. Joe

I have restarted my computer and the same issue remained.
I closed Bridge again. Reopened it while holding down Ctrl to possibly reset the Prefs. However, I didn't like the way the options read so selected Cancel.
Everything seems to be functioning correctly now.
I don't know what happened or why and would certainly appreciate any insight as to what might have happened.
I'm no newbie to PS nor Bridge as have been using them since mid 90s. Don't remember anything like this before.
Thanks again for any feedback.
Joe

Same EAR deployed on Win2K and Solaris works differently

Hi,
Deplying the same EAR, using the same deployment ant script, on 2 WLS 7.0 SP4
on respectively Win2K and Solaris 8. While the Win2K application works correctly,
the Solaris deployed one throws a ClassNotFound exception. The CLASSPATH is the
same on both systems. Is there any special requirement or any post-installation
task to be performed for Solaris ?
Kind regards,
Nicolas DUMINIL

Strange as it is, we still need a stack trace. ;)
Do you have one for the solaris CNF exception?
cheers
mbg
"Nicolas DUMINIL" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3f8ad0b0$[email protected]..
>
Hi,
As an XML application, the deployed application uses JDOM. In the beginingI used
to deploy JDOM together with the application, in the same EAR andreferencing
it from MANIFEST.MF. Later I noticed that JDOM deployment was notmandatory and
I thought that the server already had it inside. At this time I wasdeveloping
on Win2K workstations. Now I'm going live on a Solaris server and the JDOMdeployment
suddenly became mandatory. So, to resume, I don't need to deply JDOM onthe WebLogic
7.0 SP4 for Win2K and everything works fine, but I need to deploy JDOM onthe
WebLogic Server 7.0 SP4 on Solaris in order to avoid ClassNotFoundexceptions.
Strange enough isn't it ?
Kind regards,
Nicolas
"Ali Akbar" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello Nicolas,
There should not be any special requirement for Solaris platform. Can
you
please attach the stack trace?
"Nicolas DUMINIL" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3f8679c5$[email protected]..
Hi,
Deplying the same EAR, using the same deployment ant script, on 2 WLS7.0
SP4
on respectively Win2K and Solaris 8. While the Win2K application workscorrectly,
the Solaris deployed one throws a ClassNotFound exception. The
CLASSPATH
is the
same on both systems. Is there any special requirement or anypost-installation
task to be performed for Solaris ?
Kind regards,
Nicolas DUMINIL

IE problem- in same versionsite looks different

Hi,
I am very baffled by this IE behavior. I look at the page
(all gallery pages do this BTW), on my PC-Explorer version
7.0.5730.13 and everything is where it should be. My client (!)
looks at the same page on her computer IE version 7.0.5730.11, and
the signature/image is straddling the bottom container line,
pushing the footer down. I have run the test on browsershots.org/
and it works fine on IE 5.5, IE6. Why would one version of IE7 give
different result than another?
Here is
the link to the site
Here
is the link to the style sheet
I even added a space under the image/signature to see if that
would help (which looks terrible) but it has no effect on that
image at all.
Thanks so much on your help on this. I really appreciate the
wonderful help I get on these boards!
Cheers,
Janell

Janell1 posted in macromedia.dreamweaver:
> Hi,
> I am very baffled by this IE behavior. I look at the
page (all
> gallery pages
> do this BTW), on my PC-Explorer version 7.0.5730.13 and
everything
> is where it should be. My client (!) looks at the same
page on
> her computer IE version 7.0.5730.11, and the
signature/image is
> straddling the bottom container line, pushing the footer
down. I
> have run the test on browsershots.org/ and it works fine
on IE
> 5.5, IE6. Why would one version of IE7 give different
result than
> another?
>
http://www.acmedigitaldesign.com/marmit/steel.html
You've got some invalid CSS that may be causing it. Enter
your URL here
to see the errors:
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator
Mark A. Boyd
Keep-On-Learnin' :)

Scanned images in LR and PS look different.

A friend and I are both having the exact same problem (he on a Mac, me on a PC):
Scanned black and white images, saved as PSD, look significantly different in Lightroom and Photoshop. Note the attached screenshots showing the LR images as darker. When printed, the images are still different. So this clearly has nothing to do with monitor calibration. And profiles are the same.

Do you have PS Color Profile Mismatch Warnings enabled. Here's what I use:
When opening a file in PS that uses a different color profile than my working space the following will appear:
Under 'What would you like to do' select the above setting to see the image as it appears inside LR. If the problem persists it would help if you can post an image with the problem to a file sharing site such as Dropbox. We can then check it on our own systems. Upload any image that exhibits the issue.

Css layout problems - css and tables

Hi guys,
Well as some of you suggested months ago, I've been trying to
learn to layout with CSS... It's actually getting a bit rewarding
now as I start to figure a few things out but there's still plenty
of questions!!!
If anyone can take a look at what I'm working on at the
moment and give me some help I'd REALLY REALLY appreciate it!!
My main trouble (I think) is working with a drop-down menu
system that I found on the web and I'm dying to use it because it's
perfect for this design. It's layed out using a table so I'm trying
to incorporate that...
Click
[url=http://home.iprimus.com.au/jediwdog/ltc/mockup2.jpg]here[/url]
for a picture of what i'm trying to get this page to look like and
[url=http://home.iprimus.com.au/jediwdog/ltc/example1.html]here[/url]
to see how far I've got. You can download the stylesheet from
[url=http://home.iprimus.com.au/jediwdog/ltc/example1.css]here[/url].
Here's what I need to know:
1. I'm trying to push the table down so it looks better lined
up with the logo but when I tell it to be further from the top, it
doesn't seem to move. Any ideas on why?
2. As you can see, I've inserted some blank space into the
middle of the menu so that the logo doesn't cover any of the menu
items. I can't seem to get the same 1px black border on this
section.
I assume this is because the border on the other parts is a
layer/div border? Will I have to somehow put a div in there so as
to create the same border effect?
3. I'd really like to keep the header and footer visible at
all times, even if there's lots of content to scroll through. I
found this:
http://www.cssplay.co.uk/layouts/basics2.html#Top
but when I tried to implement this on my page, it all went haywire!
Is this going to be a possibility?
4. I guess other than that, have I completely stuffed this
up!? I don't think I have but it's worth asking I guess!
THANKS IN ADVANCE! I'm really loving using css layout rather
than tables - it's soooo much more versatile. I just need to get
past some obstacles I think!
Cheers
Neil

On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:17:20 +0000 (UTC), "Barb S."
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Ok, I made your suggested changes and have this:
>
> body {
> font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
> text-align: center;
> font-size: 1em;
> font-style: normal;
> text-decoration: none;
> top: 15px;
> background-image:
url(/images/backgrounds/background1.gif);
> padding-top: 15px;
>>>> width: 70%;
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> }
>
> #body {
> margin: 0 auto;
> text-align:left;
> width: 760px;
> padding-right: 20px;
> padding-bottom: 20px;
> padding-left: 20px;
> background-color: #FFFFCC;
> padding-top: 20px;
> font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
> font-size: 1em;
> color: #003366;
>
> }
>
>
http://www.japanesetemari.com
>
> The page is on the left size of the screen and the
yellow box does not expand
>out. Not exactly what I'd wanted. I like to take
advantage of larger screens
>and have the page expand out but not so far out so the
lines of text are real
>long.
> Barb
It's this in the body style that is limiting the width -
change that
to 100%
>>>> width: 70%;
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> }
~Malcolm N....
~

Prints and SoftProofs from Aperture and PS look different?

I'm using the HP Designjet 90 and there is something strange.
There is significant difference between soft-proof in Aperture and PS of the same image (exported as .psd from Aperture). In Aperture the image has some blue/cyan cast and there is no such a problem in PS Softproof.
Prints are consistent with softproofs - from Aperture it looks blueish and more warm from PS.
Why there is such a difference?

... and I'm applying the same profile in both applications

Just bought MSI R5770 and card looks different than expected

I bought this as an open Box from Fry's today.
When I opened it up, the card looks completely different than the pictures I've seen online.
The label on the back says it is a R5770 PMD1G and the serial number on the label matches the one on the box. But the fan/heatsink combination is completely different. The board layout (capacitors, etc) seems to be different as well
I'm especially concerned by the small size of the fan compared to what I was expecting.
Before I install it, I wanted to make sure I actually have the correct card that I paid for. Here is a link to a pic.

Quote from: Sansfear on 04-May-10, 19:29:16
She slapped a new reduced price sticker on it and assured me that they'd test it to make sure it worked. I'm willing to bet that if I go back there in a few days, that it will be back on the shelves and still have the wrong card in the box.
I wouldn't expect anything less from them. It was probably back on the shelf 15 minutes after you walked out. If its worth anything, I don't buy anything open box. The small savings isn't worth the hassle.

Site layout and color looks different in each browser

I created a site. When I preview the site in firefox it is just the way I created it in dreamweaver cs5, but when I preview it in IE the background color is not the pinkish color I used, it is black and the subheading is crunched up to the left and not the right. Also, in google crome browser, it is perfect except there is a huge gap of space from the bottom of the page to the footer (It shouldn't have margins but the margin is very large). The site is for a client (escort-personal), I hope that someone will be able to help/lead in the right direction.

I see a black background in IE, no doubt caused by truncated #hex color codes in the markup. Remove the table cell BGColors from your html markup.
Add this to your CSS code:
td {background: #993300}
FYI, table-based layouts are very old school. You should be learning to work with CSS Layouts.
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/articles/table_to_css_pt1.html
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb

HT4972 I can't find my music on my iphone since I upgraded to IOS - how do I find it and everything looks different on it?

I upgraded last night to IOS - not sure what version and now I can't find my music or some of my apps that I had on my Iphone?
Do I need to do something else?
Helen

Why we can't upgrade my iOs 7

How to deploy Forms, Reports and Menu from Client to Server machine

Dear Experts,
I have one requirement to deploy the Forms, Reports and Menu from client machine to server machine.
Deployment involves the following steps :
1. Firstly we have to search the selected file in a folder where the .fmx is present ( in Server machine) and take the back up of the the existing file in the server (Source and destination paths will be available).
Ex. If the existing FMB name is TEST.fmx then the backup file should be TEST_sysdate.fmx.
2. Secondly we have to transfer the file from the client folder (or from another folder of the same server) to the server folder where the back up exists.
Please help me to search/rename/copy/replace the _.fmx/.rdf/.rep/.mmx_ files from client to server.
We are using
9i Database.
10g Forms and reports.
SQL Developer tool.
OS is Windows (Client and Server).
Help me out to attach a file of front end screen which we are planning to develop. It will give a clear picture on this requirement.
Thanks :)
Edited by: 941175 on Jun 17, 2012 9:09 AM
Edited by: 941175 on Jun 17, 2012 9:12 AM
Edited by: 941175 on Jun 17, 2012 9:14 AM

941175
Welcome to the forum. Please take a while to go through the FAQ to be found to the top right of the page.
Your issue is more to do with batch files rather than Forms. The only relation with Forms, as I see it, is that you will be using HOST/CLIENT_HOST to start a batch file with the file name to be deployed as a parameter passed to it.
You need to rewrite either a CMD batch file or a Powershell script to achieve what have set out to do.
For CMD batch files look up http://www.robvanderwoude.com/battech.php , or any of the other excellent resources available on the internet.
Regards,

Website looks different on Windows machines

I have made a website using iweb08. I publish using iwebseo on MacHighway. My website consists of columns of information and each column has its own textbox. It looks perfect on my mac when called up on the web. However, when I use a Windows machine almost everything looks out of wack. All of the columns or headings look like they have moved one way or another a couple of spaces, sometimes more. How can I get the information to look the same on both types of machines?
Thank you for your time.

This may or may not help you, but to get around "web safe/unsafe fonts" I make them hyperlinks and just link them to the same page... For example, I create a separate text boxes for the navigation bar rather using the one provided since I find the text bland. I use whatever text I want that is in my library then I make it a hyperlink. Do NOT highlight the word or words when making it a hyperlink. Just select it so that the dotted square is around it.... make it a hyperlink then you can use whatever fonts you like. Then when selecting where it should lead to, select "one of my pages" and make it the same page that you are working on. (hope that makes sense...
And hope that helps.
Message was edited by: boogieon

Deploy problem - CSS and overall look different on development machine

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for