Design Suggestions Required for Message Center functionality
Hi All,
I am looking for some suggestion, for one of the requirement for my customer.
Requirement is as below.
Customer wants to have a Message Center, where in, user will be able to send a message to another another user with some content and with or without attachment. they should be able to send multiple attachment as well.
The message which users are sharing with each other should be in the conversation mode. Like for One topic or subject if a users ha sent a message to another user, the same content should be in the conversation mode and an email should be sent to other users
with he content and attachments.
In addition to above, all the messages exchanged should be stored below in the tabular format.
Discussion board does serves the purpose. But how we can control the item level permission. For example, if we wantto show items which are relevant to user who is logged in, i mean show items based on the logged in user ?
Similar Messages
-
so we currently have three domain controllers set up, two of them on 2012r2 and one of them on 2008r2. prior to any of these domain controllers being added to the domain there was only one, running on 2003r2. the 2003r2 server was up and running when the
first 2012r2 was added and that's when running 'dcdiag /e /c /v' would yield an issue with "_ldap._tcp.9a5f3c17-e7ac-48f7-ab42-bf1ea621a6f5.domains._msdcs.cmedia.local" in the DNS portion of the diagnostics, specifically:
TEST: Records registration (RReg)
Network Adapter [00000010] Microsoft Hyper-V Network Adapter:
Error:
Missing SRV record at DNS server 192.168.22.4:
_ldap._tcp.9a5f3c17-e7ac-48f7-ab42-bf1ea621a6f5.domains._msdcs.cmedia.local
after adding the second 2012r2 to the domain, this issue is still there... adding the 2008r2 server to the domain and running BPA it gives the following:
Title:
This domain controller must register a DNS SRV resource record, which is required for replication to function correctly
Severity:
Error
Date:
7/3/2014 11:24:48 AM
Category:
Configuration
Issue:
The "DcByGuid" DNS service (SRV) resource record that advertises this server as an available domain controller in the domain and ensures correct replication is not registered. All domain controllers (but not RODCs) in the domain must register this record.
Impact:
Other member computers and domain controllers in the domain or forest will not be able to locate this domain controller. This domain controller will not be able to provide a full suite of services.
Resolution:
Ensure that "DcByGuid" is not configured in the "DnsAvoidRegisteredRecords" list, either through Group Policy or through the registry. Restart the Netlogon service. Verify that the DNS service (SRV) resource record "_ldap._tcp.9a5f3c17-e7ac-48f7-ab42-bf1ea621a6f5.domains._msdcs.cmedia.local", pointing to the local domain controller "CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local", is registered in DNS.
More information about this best practice and detailed resolution procedures: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=126968
I've tried scanning and then re-scanning every single entry in DNS Manager and do not see any reference to this specific GUID mentioned, nor do I see any other domain controllers referenced that should not be in there. The two 2012r2 and the 2008r2 domain
controllers are the only ones listed in DNS Manager... the 2003r2 mentioned earlier failed and was removed.Just to chime in, I noticed that you said you have one 2008 R2 DC, and two 2012 DCs.
I also noticed in the ipconfig /all that all DCs are pointint to themselves for DNS. We usually like to see them point to a partner, then itslelf as the second entry, w hether loopback or by its own IP.
Based on that, what I suggest to level the playing field by choosing the WIndows 2008 R2 DC as the first DNS on all DCs and only administer DNS using that DC. The reason I chose that is because of the least common denominator is what we rather use so we
don't invoke any new features in the newer 2012 DNS console that 2008 R2 may not understand. After that's done, on each DC run (and you can use a PowerShell window to run this):
Rename the system32\config\netlogon.dns and netlogon.dnb files by suffixing ".old" to the file.
ipconfig /registerdns
net stop netlogon
net start netlogon
Then re-run the dcdiag /e /c /v.
Post your results, please.
Ace Fekay
MVP, MCT, MCSE 2012, MCITP EA & MCTS Windows 2008/R2, Exchange 2013, 2010 EA & 2007, MCSE & MCSA 2003/2000, MCSA Messaging 2003
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Complete List of Technical Blogs: http://www.delawarecountycomputerconsulting.com/technicalblogs.php
This posting is provided AS-IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
I thought the DNS entries were supposed to be the other way around? point to themselves first and a partner as secondary? regardless, as requested, I've changed it to what you've prescribed where they point to the 2008r2 server as the primary with themselves
as the secondary. I've also followed the steps to what seems like refreshing the DNS? on each of the DCs. Here's the output from dcdiag /e /c /v
Directory Server Diagnosis
Performing initial setup:
Trying to find home server...
* Verifying that the local machine CM-DC1-NY01, is a Directory Server.
Home Server = CM-DC1-NY01
* Connecting to directory service on server CM-DC1-NY01.
* Identified AD Forest.
Collecting AD specific global data
* Collecting site info.
Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectCategory
=ntDSSiteSettings),.......
The previous call succeeded
Iterating through the sites
Looking at base site object: CN=NTDS Site Settings,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia
,DC=local
Getting ISTG and options for the site
* Identifying all servers.
Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectClass=nt
DSDsa),.......
The previous call succeeded....
The previous call succeeded
Iterating through the list of servers
Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites
,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
objectGuid obtained
InvocationID obtained
dnsHostname obtained
site info obtained
All the info for the server collected
Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC3-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites
,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
objectGuid obtained
InvocationID obtained
dnsHostname obtained
site info obtained
All the info for the server collected
Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC4-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites
,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
objectGuid obtained
InvocationID obtained
dnsHostname obtained
site info obtained
All the info for the server collected
* Identifying all NC cross-refs.
* Found 3 DC(s). Testing 3 of them.
Done gathering initial info.
Doing initial required tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CM-DC1-NY01
Starting test: Connectivity
* Active Directory LDAP Services Check
Determining IP4 connectivity
* Active Directory RPC Services Check
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test Connectivity
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CM-DC3-NY01
Starting test: Connectivity
* Active Directory LDAP Services Check
Determining IP4 connectivity
* Active Directory RPC Services Check
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test Connectivity
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CM-DC4-NY01
Starting test: Connectivity
* Active Directory LDAP Services Check
Determining IP4 connectivity
* Active Directory RPC Services Check
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test Connectivity
Doing primary tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CM-DC1-NY01
Starting test: Advertising
The DC CM-DC1-NY01 is advertising itself as a DC and having a DS.
The DC CM-DC1-NY01 is advertising as an LDAP server
The DC CM-DC1-NY01 is advertising as having a writeable directory
The DC CM-DC1-NY01 is advertising as a Key Distribution Center
The DC CM-DC1-NY01 is advertising as a time server
The DS CM-DC1-NY01 is advertising as a GC.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test Advertising
Starting test: CheckSecurityError
* Dr Auth: Beginning security errors check!
Found KDC CM-DC1-NY01 for domain cmedia.local in site Default-First-Site-Name
Checking machine account for DC CM-DC1-NY01 on DC CM-DC1-NY01.
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :LDAP/a29d12f1-2869-44bf-8e43-adf7ddf33865._msdcs.cmedia.local
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/a29d12f1-2869-44bf-8e43-adf7ddf33865/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01
* SPN found :GC/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
[CM-DC1-NY01] No security related replication errors were found on this DC! To target the connection to a
specific source DC use /ReplSource:<DC>.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test CheckSecurityError
Starting test: CutoffServers
* Configuration Topology Aliveness Check
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test CutoffServers
Starting test: FrsEvent
* The File Replication Service Event log test
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test FrsEvent
Starting test: DFSREvent
The DFS Replication Event Log.
Skip the test because the server is running FRS.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test DFSREvent
Starting test: SysVolCheck
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test SysVolCheck
Starting test: FrsSysVol
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test FrsSysVol
Starting test: KccEvent
* The KCC Event log test
Found no KCC errors in "Directory Service" Event log in the last 15 minutes.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test KccEvent
Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
Role Schema Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Confi
guration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Domain Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Confi
guration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role PDC Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configur
ation,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Rid Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configur
ation,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Infrastructure Update Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN
=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
Starting test: MachineAccount
Checking machine account for DC CM-DC1-NY01 on DC CM-DC1-NY01.
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :LDAP/a29d12f1-2869-44bf-8e43-adf7ddf33865._msdcs.cmedia.local
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/a29d12f1-2869-44bf-8e43-adf7ddf33865/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :GC/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test MachineAccount
Starting test: NCSecDesc
* Security Permissions check for all NC's on DC CM-DC1-NY01.
The forest is not ready for RODC. Will skip checking ERODC ACEs.
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Schema,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Configuration,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Domain,Version 3)
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test NCSecDesc
Starting test: NetLogons
* Network Logons Privileges Check
Verified share \\CM-DC1-NY01\netlogon
Verified share \\CM-DC1-NY01\sysvol
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test NetLogons
Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
CM-DC1-NY01 is in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local
Checking for CN=CM-DC1-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local o
n 3 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
Checking for CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuratio
n,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local on 3 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test ObjectsReplicated
Starting test: OutboundSecureChannels
* The Outbound Secure Channels test
** Did not run Outbound Secure Channels test because /testdomain: was not entered
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test OutboundSecureChannels
Starting test: Replications
* Replications Check
* Replication Latency Check
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test Replications
Starting test: RidManager
* Available RID Pool for the Domain is 16109 to 1073741823
* CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local is the RID Master
* DsBind with RID Master was successful
* rIDAllocationPool is 4609 to 5108
* rIDPreviousAllocationPool is 4609 to 5108
* rIDNextRID: 4629
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test RidManager
Starting test: Services
* Checking Service: EventSystem
* Checking Service: RpcSs
* Checking Service: NTDS
* Checking Service: DnsCache
* Checking Service: NtFrs
* Checking Service: IsmServ
* Checking Service: kdc
* Checking Service: SamSs
* Checking Service: LanmanServer
* Checking Service: LanmanWorkstation
* Checking Service: w32time
* Checking Service: NETLOGON
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test Services
Starting test: SystemLog
* The System Event log test
A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000002F
Time Generated: 07/08/2014 13:19:14
Event String:
Time Provider NtpClient: No valid response has been received from manually configured peer 0.ca.pool.ntp.org
after 8 attempts to contact it. This peer will be discarded as a time source and NtpClient will attempt to discover a n
ew peer with this DNS name. The error was: The peer is unreachable.
Found no errors in "System" Event log in the last 60 minutes.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test SystemLog
Starting test: Topology
* Configuration Topology Integrity Check
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test Topology
Starting test: VerifyEnterpriseReferences
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test VerifyEnterpriseReferences
Starting test: VerifyReferences
The system object reference (serverReference) CN=CM-DC1-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local
and backlink on
CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local are
correct.
The system object reference (serverReferenceBL)
CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=cmedia,D
C=local
and backlink on
CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=chiefmed
ia,DC=local
are correct.
The system object reference (frsComputerReferenceBL)
CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=cmedia,D
C=local
and backlink on CN=CM-DC1-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local are correct.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test VerifyReferences
Starting test: VerifyReplicas
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test VerifyReplicas
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CM-DC3-NY01
Starting test: Advertising
The DC CM-DC3-NY01 is advertising itself as a DC and having a DS.
The DC CM-DC3-NY01 is advertising as an LDAP server
The DC CM-DC3-NY01 is advertising as having a writeable directory
The DC CM-DC3-NY01 is advertising as a Key Distribution Center
The DC CM-DC3-NY01 is advertising as a time server
The DS CM-DC3-NY01 is advertising as a GC.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test Advertising
Starting test: CheckSecurityError
* Dr Auth: Beginning security errors check!
Found KDC CM-DC1-NY01 for domain cmedia.local in site Default-First-Site-Name
Checking machine account for DC CM-DC3-NY01 on DC CM-DC1-NY01.
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :LDAP/5e9d1971-39ca-484c-922d-411c2364c96e._msdcs.cmedia.local
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/5e9d1971-39ca-484c-922d-411c2364c96e/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :GC/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
Checking for CN=CM-DC3-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local o
n 2 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
[CM-DC3-NY01] No security related replication errors were found on this DC! To target the connection to a
specific source DC use /ReplSource:<DC>.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test CheckSecurityError
Starting test: CutoffServers
* Configuration Topology Aliveness Check
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test CutoffServers
Starting test: FrsEvent
* The File Replication Service Event log test
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test FrsEvent
Starting test: DFSREvent
The DFS Replication Event Log.
Skip the test because the server is running FRS.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test DFSREvent
Starting test: SysVolCheck
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test SysVolCheck
Starting test: FrsSysVol
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test FrsSysVol
Starting test: KccEvent
* The KCC Event log test
Found no KCC errors in "Directory Service" Event log in the last 15 minutes.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test KccEvent
Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
Role Schema Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Confi
guration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Domain Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Confi
guration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role PDC Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configur
ation,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Rid Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configur
ation,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Infrastructure Update Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN
=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
Starting test: MachineAccount
Checking machine account for DC CM-DC3-NY01 on DC CM-DC3-NY01.
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :LDAP/5e9d1971-39ca-484c-922d-411c2364c96e._msdcs.cmedia.local
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/5e9d1971-39ca-484c-922d-411c2364c96e/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :GC/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test MachineAccount
Starting test: NCSecDesc
* Security Permissions check for all NC's on DC CM-DC3-NY01.
The forest is not ready for RODC. Will skip checking ERODC ACEs.
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Schema,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Configuration,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Domain,Version 3)
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test NCSecDesc
Starting test: NetLogons
* Network Logons Privileges Check
Verified share \\CM-DC3-NY01\netlogon
Verified share \\CM-DC3-NY01\sysvol
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test NetLogons
Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
CM-DC3-NY01 is in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local
Checking for CN=CM-DC3-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local o
n 3 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
Checking for CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC3-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuratio
n,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local on 3 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test ObjectsReplicated
Starting test: OutboundSecureChannels
* The Outbound Secure Channels test
** Did not run Outbound Secure Channels test because /testdomain: was not entered
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test OutboundSecureChannels
Starting test: Replications
* Replications Check
* Replication Latency Check
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test Replications
Starting test: RidManager
* Available RID Pool for the Domain is 16109 to 1073741823
* CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local is the RID Master
* DsBind with RID Master was successful
* rIDAllocationPool is 15109 to 15608
* rIDPreviousAllocationPool is 15109 to 15608
* rIDNextRID: 15110
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test RidManager
Starting test: Services
* Checking Service: EventSystem
* Checking Service: RpcSs
* Checking Service: NTDS
* Checking Service: DnsCache
* Checking Service: NtFrs
* Checking Service: IsmServ
* Checking Service: kdc
* Checking Service: SamSs
* Checking Service: LanmanServer
* Checking Service: LanmanWorkstation
* Checking Service: w32time
* Checking Service: NETLOGON
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test Services
Starting test: SystemLog
* The System Event log test
Found no errors in "System" Event log in the last 60 minutes.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test SystemLog
Starting test: Topology
* Configuration Topology Integrity Check
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test Topology
Starting test: VerifyEnterpriseReferences
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test VerifyEnterpriseReferences
Starting test: VerifyReferences
The system object reference (serverReference) CN=CM-DC3-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local
and backlink on
CN=CM-DC3-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local are
correct.
The system object reference (serverReferenceBL)
CN=CM-DC3-NY01,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=cmedia,D
C=local
and backlink on
CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC3-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=chiefmed
ia,DC=local
are correct.
The system object reference (frsComputerReferenceBL)
CN=CM-DC3-NY01,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=cmedia,D
C=local
and backlink on CN=CM-DC3-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local are correct.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test VerifyReferences
Starting test: VerifyReplicas
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test VerifyReplicas
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CM-DC4-NY01
Starting test: Advertising
The DC CM-DC4-NY01 is advertising itself as a DC and having a DS.
The DC CM-DC4-NY01 is advertising as an LDAP server
The DC CM-DC4-NY01 is advertising as having a writeable directory
The DC CM-DC4-NY01 is advertising as a Key Distribution Center
The DC CM-DC4-NY01 is advertising as a time server
The DS CM-DC4-NY01 is advertising as a GC.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test Advertising
Starting test: CheckSecurityError
* Dr Auth: Beginning security errors check!
Found KDC CM-DC1-NY01 for domain cmedia.local in site Default-First-Site-Name
Checking machine account for DC CM-DC4-NY01 on DC CM-DC1-NY01.
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :LDAP/37830012-1f10-43c9-a0ff-2a0e8a912187._msdcs.cmedia.local
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/37830012-1f10-43c9-a0ff-2a0e8a912187/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :GC/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
Checking for CN=CM-DC4-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local o
n 2 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
[CM-DC4-NY01] No security related replication errors were found on this DC! To target the connection to a
specific source DC use /ReplSource:<DC>.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test CheckSecurityError
Starting test: CutoffServers
* Configuration Topology Aliveness Check
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test CutoffServers
Starting test: FrsEvent
* The File Replication Service Event log test
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test FrsEvent
Starting test: DFSREvent
The DFS Replication Event Log.
Skip the test because the server is running FRS.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test DFSREvent
Starting test: SysVolCheck
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test SysVolCheck
Starting test: FrsSysVol
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test FrsSysVol
Starting test: KccEvent
* The KCC Event log test
Found no KCC errors in "Directory Service" Event log in the last 15 minutes.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test KccEvent
Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
Role Schema Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Confi
guration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Domain Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Confi
guration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role PDC Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configur
ation,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Rid Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configur
ation,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Infrastructure Update Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN
=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
Starting test: MachineAccount
Checking machine account for DC CM-DC4-NY01 on DC CM-DC4-NY01.
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :LDAP/37830012-1f10-43c9-a0ff-2a0e8a912187._msdcs.cmedia.local
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/37830012-1f10-43c9-a0ff-2a0e8a912187/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :GC/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test MachineAccount
Starting test: NCSecDesc
* Security Permissions check for all NC's on DC CM-DC4-NY01.
The forest is not ready for RODC. Will skip checking ERODC ACEs.
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Schema,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Configuration,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Domain,Version 3)
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test NCSecDesc
Starting test: NetLogons
* Network Logons Privileges Check
Verified share \\CM-DC4-NY01\netlogon
Verified share \\CM-DC4-NY01\sysvol
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test NetLogons
Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
CM-DC4-NY01 is in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local
Checking for CN=CM-DC4-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local o
n 3 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
Checking for CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC4-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuratio
n,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local on 3 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test ObjectsReplicated
Starting test: OutboundSecureChannels
* The Outbound Secure Channels test
** Did not run Outbound Secure Channels test because /testdomain: was not entered
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test OutboundSecureChannels
Starting test: Replications
* Replications Check
* Replication Latency Check
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test Replications
Starting test: RidManager
* Available RID Pool for the Domain is 16109 to 1073741823
* CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local is the RID Master
* DsBind with RID Master was successful
* rIDAllocationPool is 15609 to 16108
* rIDPreviousAllocationPool is 15609 to 16108
* rIDNextRID: 15609
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test RidManager
Starting test: Services
* Checking Service: EventSystem
* Checking Service: RpcSs
* Checking Service: NTDS
* Checking Service: DnsCache
* Checking Service: NtFrs
* Checking Service: IsmServ
* Checking Service: kdc
* Checking Service: SamSs
* Checking Service: LanmanServer
* Checking Service: LanmanWorkstation
* Checking Service: w32time
* Checking Service: NETLOGON
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test Services
Starting test: SystemLog
* The System Event log test
Found no errors in "System" Event log in the last 60 minutes.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test SystemLog
Starting test: Topology
* Configuration Topology Integrity Check
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test Topology
Starting test: VerifyEnterpriseReferences
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test VerifyEnterpriseReferences
Starting test: VerifyReferences
The system object reference (serverReference) CN=CM-DC4-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local
and backlink on
CN=CM-DC4-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local are
correct.
The system object reference (serverReferenceBL)
CN=CM-DC4-NY01,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=cmedia,D
C=local
and backlink on
CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC4-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=chiefmed
ia,DC=local
are correct.
The system object reference (frsComputerReferenceBL)
CN=CM-DC4-NY01,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=cmedia,D
C=local
and backlink on CN=CM-DC4-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local are correct.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test VerifyReferences
Starting test: VerifyReplicas
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test VerifyReplicas -
Making a flexfield segment 'required' for a particular function
Hi
How do we make a flexfield segment 'required' for a particular function.
I don't want to make this field required from core applications(System administrator), but only for a function.
kindly give Suggestions..I understand that this is a issue, as a workaround you can do this for your page alone.
1. Get the handle to the flex bean segment in your page
2. make it required.
This is what the devguide says
1. Find the flex bean by attribute name and call processFlex() on the flex bean.
2. Call getIndexedChild(int) to extract the TextBeans from the flex bean and do whatever you want.
code shld be something like this
OAPageLayoutBean page = oapagecontext.getPageLayoutBean();
OAMessageTextInputBean segmentBonus=(OAMessageTextInputBean)page.findChildRecursive("OfferDetailsFlex0");
if (segmentBonus!=null) {
segmentBonus.setRequired(true);
Thanks
Tapash -
Cisco Access Registrar 5 : What design or requirements for active/ active deploiement
Hi Every one
I want to install Cisco Access Registrar 5 on two different servers in active/ active design
What design or requirements for active/ active deploiement ?
Using Sun Solaris ? (i know using sun Sloaris i can have this mode of high availability BUT I PREFER INSTALLING IT ON RED HAT ENTERPRISE )
Using RED HAT ENTERPRISE on the two servers ? i wan to knew if i must use Vmware with the adequate licences (Vcenter) to provide FT fonctionnality for active / active Design ?
How i can use the replication to provide a complet active / active Design ?
Cordialement
Zammit IkbelIt depends what functionalities you want to use on CAR.
For example:
If only plain authentication is needed, you can install two servers independently and just configure replication between them (they just need IP visibility to replicate configuration). NAS clients can contact servers in round-robin or you can share load on two servers in some other way.
If you want CAR to perform session management and dynamic IP address allocation, than you need some cluster solution, as two servers must have synchronized state of sessions and consistent administration of addresses allocated from a pool.
Best regards,
Jasmina -
Suggestion required for with or without BPM
I have a requirement IDOC-XI-SOAP.
I am using multimapping 1:N one idoc gets spilt into say three wsdl, A B and C.
My first requirement is if A fails then B and C should not be sent.
If I use only EOIO without BPM then I will need to identify B and C for the corresponding A in the queue and remove it.
That looks tedious as sometimes B and C may not be there for A and is there any way to identify the related messages?
This can be achieved through BPM I believe.
My second requirement is IDOC2 should not be processed before IDOC1.
So If I used BPM will this be guaranteed? is BPM EOIO. (Even after transformation step?) If not then can it be configured?
Thanks in advance.Hi all,
Just bringing this topic up again as I have stuck at one place. and found not much help on SDN.
I have designed this requirement using BPM.
That is IDOC-BPM-SOAP.
Within BPM I make a synchronous call to Webservice. if there is a fault exception thrown the BPM workflow stops at that point and no further process steps are carried out. This is working fine as per the requirement.
But this does not get blocked up in the BPM queue. I want to stop the next IDOC from processing before handling the prviously errored IDOC scenario.
Now I briefly understand that since BPM is doing a sync call these are not placed in the queue. Is there a way I can handle this so that these interfaces are placed in the BPM queue (which starts with XBQO$PE_WS.....).
I have tried with exception branch, even this stops the BPM workflow but does not block the queue, or the workflow gets processed successfully.
Is there anyway I can block the queue if the BPM synch call fails? -
Java technology/framework suggestions required for solution.
Hi,
I'm a C/PRO*C developer (for the past 12 years) and have been asked to do some Java ( which I haven't touched for 13 years).
I would like you input on the 'correct' solution (kind of like an architectural overview) of the technologies I should be looking at.
There are two parts to this.
I need to write a web browser/Application that picks up a file locally on windows PC and reads the contents of the file to populate some url parameters which go to a specific web sevice via HTTPS.
I then need a web service or some kind of servlet (I guess) that on receipt of the request by the client then stores (to a database) the request for auditing and then creates a soap message (using the data receieved) to an external third party( WSDL provided by thirdpparty). Once the thirdparty responds the web server then generates a web page for the client which includes a number of options and details retrieved from the thirdparty are displayed and on the client selecting them the result is sent to the server and the selected option is stored.
Part of this must be that the server must be capable of running as a number of instances. It must be highly secure.
What java technologies/frameworks should be looked out? Is my very rough design fundamentally floored?
Thanks in advance.
OFNOldFashionedNewbie wrote:
So should I use servlets as opposed to JSP? or JCF?Servlets are not opposed to JSP. (JCF? Do you mean JSF?) You can and would use both Servlets and JSP, however, I have grown to believe that JSPs are awful and you should use Velocity instead. From what I've heard of JSF, I'd avoid that too.
Essentially then create a servlet that accepts HTTP request and manipulates a call to the thirdparty, audits data to database, and returns a page back to client which then accepts the option.The server accepts the HTTP request and deals with that lower-level stuff for you, then it invokes your servlet.
The servlet shouldn't call the third party, etc.; it should invoke other code (that you'd write) to do all that. You need a layer of abstraction between your business logic and the web tier. Among other things this will make it much easier to test.
If I were wanting to run this as a in multiple instances then I create a connection pool to the database. But could multiple app instances be able to use one network connection to the ThirdParty?I suppose they could but it seems like more trouble than it's worth and a whole layer of infrastructure that I wouldn't bother with unless (a) you've demonstrated that it's a problem during profiling, and (b) you find that there's some preferably open-source library that handles this for you. -
SICF services required for e-mail functionality in Web IC
We are running a web ic in CRM 2007 sp4
I have inbound e-mails coming through our inbox in our web ic. However as soon as i trying to process the e-mails from the inbox i'm getting errors. No mail body text is visible in email component and when i try and forward an e-mail or create a new e-mail i get a JRE error (buttom-left of IE).
Can anyone tell me what services need to be enabled for email functionality to work?
Or can anyone recommend any other soultion to this issue
Thanks in advance
EddieYou may refer to the URLs below:
Agent Inbox in the Interaction Center WinClient
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/fc/dd35a47ffe420da97a105b00c63d74/frameset.htm
Basic Settings for the Agent Inbox
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/fc/dd35a47ffe420da97a105b00c63d74/frameset.htm
E-Mail Inbox
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/fc/dd35a47ffe420da97a105b00c63d74/frameset.htm
Also please explore the option of "Email Response management system" in SPRO for advance email service settings.
1. assign different agents to different e-mail addresses: It will be configurable.
2. different signatures when writing e-mail need different editor profiles (default signatures)? so also need different IC profile?
Yes you will need different IC profiles and assign it to the group of agents who would comply to it.
3. outbound e-mails -> Told you what i believe shoudl work.
4. how many services (tcode SICF) and how many SAPconnect nodes are needed to be able in ICWin to receive e-mails for 10 email addresses and distribute e-maild to different agents like I wrote in point 1. ?
ONLY one SAPConnect node.
5. incoming e-mails: We really need tyo check the ACTIVITY Type: Incoming email.
6. in ICwin user can search in e-mails with key words? for eg "problem with ht-1000"?
I m really not sure, as we are maintaing an Activity for Incoming or outgoing email, we should be able to search an Activity for BP (that activity can have email details).
7. incoming e-mails can have attachements? attachements will also get to ICWin with email? user will be able to open it?
Yes however for opening attachments you may have internet security concerns of the enterprise where SAP is implemented. It can be easily handled by networking people.
Hope there is some help
thanks,
Veevake -
Suggestions required for transferring cost from GL account to a Project
Hi,
We have a requirement where we want to transfer cost captured in GL to PA in a specific project.
For example:
Incurred a misc cost 100 (outside project) and posted to GL (a/c 600010)
Dr 60010, Cr 120010
Later, realized this should be absorbed as a project cost (a/c 220010)
We need some mechanism to capture cost in project ABC such that Dr 220010, Cr 600010
If we use Web ADI to upload 'Costed' transactions: Dr 220010 Cr <NULL> (GL Transfer Status - Accepted)
If we use Web ADI to upload 'Accounted' transaction: Dr 220010 Cr 600010 (GL Transfer Status - Received), but in this case the entry is no passed to GL, to nullify the a/c balance in 600010
Appreciate suggestions from experts, to address the requirement.
AshutoshHi
You can reverse the transaction posted in GL.
Then load the amount to Projects, as costed, not accounted EI.
When distributing the cost in PA it will generate the right accounting, and you could interface it to GL.
Dina -
Design Suggestion required in handling a scenario with three systems.
Hi All,
Here is my scenario.
Legacy(Sync)->PIAsync->CRM-Async>PI--Async->BI
1. Legacy will send synchronous message to PI.
2. PI will send response back to Legacy with simple message "OK Status".
3. PI will map the Request message to CRM Idoc and send to CRM in Async mode.
4. Once Idoc is posted (53), I need to map the same request message(from legacy) to BI Idoc and pass to BI system.
The condition is I should not pass the BI Idoc untill CRM idoc is posted.
Can someone suggest me the steps to handle this scenario.
Thanks
Deepthi.Hi Abhishek,
>> I am doubtful if you could execute a SYNC behavior from PI itself.
Since we are handling through Idoc to CRM. I'm not sure whether I can handle it through Sync mode.
I'm thinking of the below BPM process. Please correct me if i'm wrong.
1.Receive(Sync message) -
>2.Send (Response back to sender- closesync/Async bridge ) >3.Send (Idoc to CRM in Asyncmode)>4.Receive(Idoc from CRM, and validate using correlation, in Asyn mode ) --->5. Send(Idoc to BI)
1. Once I receive request from Legacy, Will open S/A bridge.
2. Send response to legacy system. This will be map1.
3. Send Idoc to CRM. This will be map2.
4. Receive Idoc from CRM. I need to check the correlation based on Sale number. This will be in Async mode.
5. Once the correleation is correct, I need to pass the Idoc to BI. This will be map3.
Map1: Request from Legacy to response message of legacy.
Map2: Request from Legacy to CRM Idoc1.
Map3: Request from Legacy to BI Idoc.
>> ask the CRM system to send back a response to PI once the IDOC is posted (53)....agree on a time-frame within which you should be receiving a reply so that the BPM can be made to wait for that time.
I'm not sure how to handle this task. DO I need to get separate Idoc with the confirmation status from CRM? Will it be in Async mode?
How to know the confirmation from the Idoc, Do i need to add a correlation for this? -
Suggestion required for using row level security
We have a scenario to provide row level security to some of the transaction tables like HR_EMPLOYEE which has a foreign key column DEPT_ID to HR_DEPARTMENTS table. This table may grow up to about 5 million records. There could be regular SELECT operations on this table and not so frequent UPDATES compared to the SELECT operation.
We were looking at the following approaches...
Table :
HR_EMPLOYEE
EMPNO
DEPT_ID
LAST_NAME
FIRST_NAME
1. Enable Oracle Label Security policy on this table and use static predicates.
In this approach we add the OLS policy column (POLICY_COLUMN) and add predicate to access data.
e.g. we will be giving access to global data by predicate like
OR POLICY_COLUMN =CHAR_TO_LABEL('POLICY_NAME','C::DEPT1')
where C::DEPT is the OLS Label
2. Using VPD policy. We donot add any column, instead use the existing column DEPT_ID to provide row label security. In this approach the DEPT_ID is to be compared against an additional table and DOMINATES function will be used to verify the permission for the user to access the data.
e.g. In this approach, the policy function is like
'DOMINATES(char_to_label(''POLICY_NAME'', SA_SESSION.LABEL(''POLICY_NAME''))
,char_to_label(''POLICY_NAME'', POLICY_PKG.GET_LABEL_FROM_DEPTID(DEPT_ID))) = 1'
The GET_LABEL_FROM_DEPTID function returns the OLS label for the corresponding department. This is compared with the user's session label and appropriate rows are given access.
Can someone suggest on which of the above approaches is more performance effective considering the number of records and the additional OLS column added to the table.Hi there,
would you be able to describe as detailed as possible what you want to achieve? From my first glimpse at your code, it seems as if you are using both OLS and VPD in a rather extraordinary way.
Best, Peter -
Suggestion required for STOCKE MATERIAL to non stock material in the PO
Hi all
by mistake system clears account assignment for non stock material due to some user exit.
1. PO line item 01 - mm 100011 -stock material - plant 1000
2 . PO line item 02 - mm 100011 -non-stock material -plant 1100 - it has account assignment - in the request - by mistake this account assignment got cleared while creatring Purchase order
now i have realised this issue while doing good receipt.
now second line item 02 - mm 100011 - needs to be correct to receive goods . what action item needs be taken so that i can pay the invoice.
can i make in the line item 02 - Account assig category K and enter GL account AND cost center. - to correct the issue.
i have corrected this issue for future in the user exit.so not clear account assignment.
MuthuBoth the cases you need to pay invoice.Only the difference is first line item the material qty goes into stock.Second line item is not stock item as you are assigning account assignment.
To correct the issue for second line item you can change it to account assignment item if system allowed.Why I am saying you mentioned user exit influencing the PO to change the line item.
So first check user criteria what are the controlling perameters to save the PO.It seems your user exit checking line items if first line item stock item then it is changing all th line items as stock item.Take ABAP person help what are the user exits exist in PO -
Architectural/design documentation required for Self Service Expenses application
I'm looking for architectural/design documentation on the Oracle Applications Self Service Expense Reporting application.
Specifically I'd like to know how it was designed & architected, what technologies were used to develop it (e.g. CABO, B24J, Oracle Workflow, AQ etc.) and how these technologies interact to form the final system.
We have a product called the Oracle Migration Workbench. It is a standalone java-based application that facilitates the migration of non-Oracle databases over to Oracle9i. We're investigating the possibility of developing a web-based migration capability. Of course we appreciate that moving from a tool-based, single user solution to a web based, multi user solution is not a trivial task.
Seeing that you guys would have already tackled many of the challenges we face I'd appreciate it if you can provide me with any pertinent information.
Any white papers/architectural collateral you can give me would be greatly appreciated.
thanks in advance
- GarryHi Did you ever get this documentation? I would really appreciate some more info on this to [email protected]
-
Suggestion Required for delivery address creation process
Dear All,
in my business process here i have suggested the creation of delivery address at the compnay code level. That is all the delivery address are attached to the business partner of company code so that the delivery address across organization is visible to all the users and they can search and select any delivery address they want.
please let me know if that has got any performnce issue or if that is the righ procatice .. considering we have thousands of delivery addresss to be created.
cheers
Iftekhar AlamHello lrsapsd
You first need to decide the business processes that you would (can) cover within SAP and which will be out of SAP. Check out SAP for Real Estate Industry Solution, If you can not go that way, here is my proposal:
1. Adv in News Papers: Outside SAP
2. Selling of tender forms: Outside SAP
3. Accept tenders with refundable deposits: Enter them as quotes, You may use AV-Quotation f.Contract or AG-Quotation. Bidders (Renters) will be sold-tos or Prospects and quote will be priced manually with the amount they bid to pay for rent. Deposits may be collected via a Debit Memo and posted to a Temporary Holding Account.
4. Agreement with highest Quoted: Reject all the Bids except the one with highest quote, Convert that quote into Rental Contract (MV) with Periodic Billing Plan. Billing Plan Type- 02; Date Determination Rule- 50.
5. Collect 3 months rent in Advance: Can be managed with Billing Plan and/or down payment.
6. collect the rent every month- Monthly billing of rent using Periodic Billing Plan
7. At the end of the period refund the deposit- Credit Memo Req and Credit Memo, can be automated using contract end date and triggered by workflow with Status control of contract if needed.
Hope this helps. -
Suggestion required for Rental process
Hello Gurus,
Please suggest a suitable solution for the following scenario:
Client has property like office space and shops.
client gives it on rent, the current process is as follows:
1. Adv in News Papers
2. Selling of tender forms.
3. Accept tenders with refundable deposits.
4. Agreement with highest Quoted.
5. Collect 3 months rent in Advance
6. collect the rent every month.
7. At the end of the period refund the deposit.
Kindly suggest the document types, copy control and periodic billing steps and pricing to be used in SAP SD.
Thanks & RegardsHello lrsapsd
You first need to decide the business processes that you would (can) cover within SAP and which will be out of SAP. Check out SAP for Real Estate Industry Solution, If you can not go that way, here is my proposal:
1. Adv in News Papers: Outside SAP
2. Selling of tender forms: Outside SAP
3. Accept tenders with refundable deposits: Enter them as quotes, You may use AV-Quotation f.Contract or AG-Quotation. Bidders (Renters) will be sold-tos or Prospects and quote will be priced manually with the amount they bid to pay for rent. Deposits may be collected via a Debit Memo and posted to a Temporary Holding Account.
4. Agreement with highest Quoted: Reject all the Bids except the one with highest quote, Convert that quote into Rental Contract (MV) with Periodic Billing Plan. Billing Plan Type- 02; Date Determination Rule- 50.
5. Collect 3 months rent in Advance: Can be managed with Billing Plan and/or down payment.
6. collect the rent every month- Monthly billing of rent using Periodic Billing Plan
7. At the end of the period refund the deposit- Credit Memo Req and Credit Memo, can be automated using contract end date and triggered by workflow with Status control of contract if needed.
Hope this helps. -
Hi,
I am trying to design a master-slave system with the following attributes:
1. Linux Master box having all the Java code.
2. At least two Windows XP Professional Slave boxes (no Java code on any of these)
Front end screens on Master would contain a text fields for IP Address and Java program to be executed. On a click of button, the slaves (who's IP Address was entered in the Master screen text field) would get the request to execute the given Java program, a given number of times. Once executed, each slave would turn the results in to the master via a file. After all the slaves have turned in their results, Master would consolidate the results, work another program on the results and re-delegate tasks to the slaves. The steps would stop iterating only when an exit criteria specified by the program has been met.
If we were to restrict all code to only the master box, what could be the lucidly possible ways to achieve this design?
Thanks!I don't think it is possible to just throw code at a machine and make it run. You will need some kind of application in which to handle it. What you're trying to achieve can be done easily, if you were to write something to communicate with RMI, but as far making it work without something to know it's Java, It doesn't seem possible. Applets run on machines because you have a browser that knows to dispatch all applets requests to the JRE, you need something that will do the same.
hth
Maybe you are looking for
-
How can I restore my iPhone 3Gs after I tried to update to the new operating system.
I tried to upgrade my 3Gs to the new operating system(IOS5) and I got some kind of unknown error. I told iTunes to do the back up before doing the upgrade. The phone is stuck in restore mode with the "connect to iTunes" logo displayed. I have the l
-
I am doing a school project, and I need to use a stickman and Armature. Whenever I try and edit the armature, it erases the stick dude in the 3 frames before the one I'm editing. my teacher do0esn't know what to do, and neither of my Friends do eithe
-
I can't drag and drop a Goggle image onto a Word doc.
Is there a Firefox preference that allows images to drag and drop onto a Word doc?
-
o/s Windows 7
-
My ipad2 wont sync/recognize with my itunes. Helpppp!!
Hi, i own a ipad 2 wifi+3g. Work well at first but recently, it cannot sync with my itunes. Itunes wont recognize it. Tried reinstalling my itunes but still the same. It wont even charge using the wall adapter. all it says was 'not charging'. Help! T