Determine copa posting

hi,
1 may i know if ke4i and kei2 to allow the value directly post to copa table without have to do top down?
2 may i know what other tcode besides ke4i and kei2 to make value directly post to copa table.
thanks

These transaction are customizing transactions.
First do a analysing what you want to report in CO-PA.
besed on that you can define your Atribute and Value field.
Then the next step is how to fill these fields, the fields are filled based on the sales conditions, perhaps you want have some field from product costing then you set-up an other table
Have a look in the SAP Documentation:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/7a/4c48c64a0111d1894c0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm

Similar Messages

Account determination for posting area Aggr

Hi experts,
i'm very new to ISU and would like your help on an issue.i am using ETHIM to post mass act aggr posting for the serv prov.i get an error *Key selection not defined for application &1, posting area &2* msg no 005..
exact error msg would be *In Customizing, define the keys you require by selecting the appropriate entry for account determination for posting area Aggr.: Conversion of Ext. Transacts. to N(R075).*
what transaction will i have to use in order to post the doc. doc type AL.
thanks in advance
cheers,
deepak rao

hi Deepak,
FQC0 is the correct t.code and maintain the document type for the posting area
BA: payment settlement
SA: GL account document
just try it out with this.
Regds,
Naren

Account determination for posting area "1040

Hi
While creating a check lot we're getting the error as
"In account determination for posting area "1040" (interim account for incoming payments), your specifications are either incomplete or missing.
The transaction affects company code UINF and currency USD."
Any clue about the reason
Regards,

Hi ,
Maintain the interim account for incoming payments through the T.code FQC0.
Regards,
Konakanchi

Error in Determine delta posting in CKMLCPAVR

Hi All,
While testing for CKMLCPAVR " determine Delta posting " I haev come across a weird error
Internal error in FORM+/FUNCTION CKMLAVR_CLOSE_SINGLE in position 6 with RC1
Message no. C+099
Before this error I had faced error where systme has asked to update BSD and UMD key in OBYC. I have updated the same. Later I haev faced the above error.
Just for information I am using actual price as well as in configuration i have updated indicator 2 in activate actual costing.
But I changed from 1 to 2 in half way through my testing.
Please, let me know if any of you have come across such error in course of CKMLCPAVR.
Best Regards
Prabhat Kumar

Hi Sarada,
The multilevel price determination is perfectly ok for me. The kind of weird error messages particularly in ML area .... it is really very hard nut to crack..... I am planning to test again in new plant with the same scenarios.. let me test and if I come across the same error .. then need to think of OSS.
ANyway thanks....
Hello All,
If you have any observation on this , then lplease put your thought forward....
Best Regards
Prabhat Kumar

COPA posting reversal

We are using ECC6, new GL and COPA. SAP modules SD, MM, FI, CO.
A complex posting has been made with a Sales Order automatically generating a Purchase Order which was GRNd and invoices issued. All of the postings were subsequently cancelled or reversed due to errors and omissions and a new sequence of postings made. This happened several times before the users thought they had got it right!
The end result has been that the Revenue, as shown in the KE30 report, is now zero, but the COGS posting still remains.
Can anyone suggest why the COGS posting would not have been reversed along with the finance postings and how we could resolve this?
Thanks in advance

Thanks, Abhisek
the sequence of postings was very complex. let me post you the email I got from the Finance user:
History of events leading up to this error.
u2022     Sales order 979 created.
u2022     And from that PO 4500000941 was raised. 3 lines !
u2022     The PO was GRNu2019d
u2022     I then matched (Vendor) invoice BAE1286 to the GRN
u2022     Ian raised invoice 90001690 to WUK
u2022     In the following month I received the duty and delivery charge invoice from (freight company), I realised then that the delivery cost generated was 4x the cost of the goods. To correct the problem we had to back out/reverse all the documents and Ian would re-price the delivery charges.
u2022     Ian raised credit note 90001938 to cancel invoice 90001690
u2022     And I reversed out the (Vendor) invoice
u2022     Ian created 3 new lines on PO, now 4, 5 and 6
u2022     I re-posted the test rite invoice and the (Freight) charges to the new lines
u2022     I asked Ian to raise the new invoice in billings due list, however when Ian tried to find it in billings due it wasnu2019t there!
u2022     So again I reversed the (Vendor) and (Freight) invoices from lines 4, 5 and 6. This left the Balance of the order at 0.00 !
u2022     Ian raised another sales order and PO, SO 1723 and PO being 4500001625.
u2022     I posted the (Vendor) invoice and (Freight) charges and from that Ian raised invoice 90001952
At this point I thought that this was job done, however I checked the KE30 and discovered something wrong.
Make sure you run ke30 for the full year to see the results
               Rev          COGS
Sales doc 979            67K          61K
Crd 900000077          -67K          0
Sales doc 1723           67K          63K               (Reason the COGS is 2k
higher is because of the
addition (Freight) cost)
Total               67K          124K
As you can see the COGS is now double to the revenue!
Now it thought that this could be 2 things, either when I did the reversal of the (Vendor) invoice it did not reverse the COGS in KE30, or when the credit note reversed it did not reverse the COGS in KE30 ?
On PO 4500000941 invoice cancelled the posting and tried to raise another credit but this time a stock credit in the hope that it would reverse the COGS posting. Credit note 90002063 was raised however it did not reverse the GOGS. And it has now left us in a worst state than before, please see below.
               Rev          COGS
Sales doc 979            67K          61K
Crd 60000077          -67K          0
Crd 60000079          -67K          0
Sales doc 1723           67K          63K
Total                0K          124K
What I advised Ian to do is to cancel sales doc 60000079 (credit note 90002067) so we are back in this position, I had to do this as the sale ledger for (our operating concern) did not balance we had to 1 to may credits raised. (Operating Concern) account is now o.k and we are back in this position with the KE30
Rev          COGS
Sales doc 979            67K          61K
Crd 900000077          -67K          0
Sales doc 1723           67K          63K               (Reason the COGS is 2k
higher is because of the
addition (Freight) cost)
Total               67K          124K
We have raised endless amounts of reversals, credits notes, new POu2019s that it is totally confusion in the document flow so I donu2019t want to go down the route of doing anymore however we need to fix the COGS ?
A reason why the COGS never reversed is maybe because the original PO was cancelled (trash cans next to each line) before we raised the credits ?
Is there away we can manually credit 67K in the COGS for Test rite ?
I think you can see why I'm calling for help! Will KE21N allow them to make a posting that will create the credit they need?
Thanks for your time.

Output Determination For Posted Invoice

When an invoice is posted against a purchase order I need the system to create an IDOC for external transmission.
I already have a partner profile setup for the external party (vendor). How do I go about setting up the output determination?
Thanks - points will be rewarded.

Hello, Brian
To setup the Output determination for Invoice Verification, follow the steps:
You can configure these settings through t.code: NACE
or NACT
By specifying the Application: MR (this is for INVOICE)
Select -> Application MR -> Press Output types
then -> Select your Output type
(choose LIEF, if Output is for External Vendor).
-> goto Details
then
-> choose the relevent fields in Default values Tab (i.e, mainly Dispatch TimeTransmission medium Ex: 5-External send and 6-EDI similarly Partner function Ex: VN-Vendor,etc )
then
-> Processing routines
-> Partner functions
Suggestion: You can use NACE or NACT (either)
Hope this will clarifies you,
Reward, if it helps,
Regards,
Srin.K

No jurisdiction code could be determined(IDOC Post)

Hi
can any one tell me what is this error and how do resolve?
when i'm trying to post the idoc into r/3, i'm getting this error..
Status Records:
51 Application Document not posted
No jurisdiction code could be determined
Message no. TAX_TXJCD101
Regards..Rambarki

Hi
thanks for quick reply..
I dint see those notes and i'll ask for functional people.
idoc type i s: DEBMAS01 (ZDEB01)..standard!
Auctully other vendor EAI can able to post the same IDOC in same port , but while i'm using XI throguh IDOC adapter i'm gettig this error...
The same partner profiles i'm using...
Regards
Rambarki

Asking account determination while posting to MB1A

hi friends,
while posting goods issue to cost center(MB1A). i am getting the following error
ACCOUNT DETERMINATION FOR ENTRY (CHART OF ACCOUNTS) GBB _________VBR 3000 NOT POSSIBLE, and
ACCOUNT DETERMINATION FOR ENTRY (CHART OF ACCOUNTS) BSX _________VBR 3000 NOT POSSIBLE
actually i assigned all the required GL acounts in obyc( i assigned GL accounts for BSX and GBB too). i dont know what to do.can anybody please help me out from this problem

OMWB is the right tool to detect the error. Go to this transaction code and enter the plant and material number. Select the movement type (201?). Double click on the GI to cost center. Then click on Account Assignment icon. The resultant output will show what is missing.
Valuation grouping code (Valuation modifier) also plays a majore role, as it groups plant together, to be used in maintaining account determination. of GBB for ZOB

COPA Posting date

Hello friends,
The posting date field COPA is giving the last date of the month and not the actual date .
Does anyone know how this field can be set to give the actual date on which the posting has occurred .Or if there is a alternate field available that can provide this information.
COPA has a field as 'created on' but I believe that it will give the date on which the document was created on and not the date on which additional costs were added .
Thanks

COPA cube and datasource are the custom made.
The field "Date on Which Record Was Created" - HZDAT from table CE12000 can provide me the relevant information .But this field is not available in the extract structure.
Does anybody know how I can get this field in extract sturucture?
Thanks.

How Does Apple Determine What Posts Are Not Allowed to Remain?

Apple has deleted 2 posts that, while not favorable to Leopard, do not seem to violate any of the rules. I noticed that not all posts are favorable (naturally) but remain posted. Does Apple just search for the poster's user name and remove on that basis? I'll try posting the same message under another user name and see if it get's deleted or not. I am assuming that this message will be deemed to violate Apple's policy and Apple will remove this post very quickly.

C O'Kane wrote:
So if one just says: I installed Leopard and lost all data and all third party applications and the Genius Bar could not fix and the data recovery place could not fix either in response to a posted question: "how was your experience with Leopard?" ..... is that a violation of the policy? It does not seem like it should be but that's the fact scenarioc
Yes. It has nothing to do with asking a specific technical question and asking for an answer.
This is not the Daily Agony Column that Holmes likes to read. It's not what you "seem" to want for a message board post.
The title here is Installation and Setup. I would ask a deeper question, however, which is why you would want to make such a post? To scare others? To make yourself "feel" better? What would be the point? You don't walk into a Post Office and start ranting about a letter you got from an Aunt who just cut you off in her will. I mean, you might, but why?
The fact is that there are many posts here on these boards that are unfavorable towards Apple and Leopard and even Apple staff. But they contain enough "meat" that they are not deleted.
Of the posts that I have seen vanish, most had nothing in them of any value. It's also interesting that many rants are from people who purportedly speak English but cannot spell simple words and know nothing about punctuation. In my holistic view of the world, I am not surprised that their computers crashed upon upgrading to Leopard. I keep repeating that it is all attention to details.

Copa posting

HI,
while postings in copa value which tabel data will store
please reply
Thank you!
Best Regards,
Pradheep.

HI,
Normally COPA table names : CE1XXXX , CE2XXX , CE3XXX and CE4XXX. Here XXXX is your operating concern name.
when we generate the operating concern system automatically create the COPA tables start with CE1/CE2/CE3/CE4 and ends with your operating concern name.
EX : your operation concern name = IN00.
you table name = CE1IN00. and CE2IN00 ......
thanks.
Edited by: sandhya reddy on Jul 4, 2009 5:35 PM

Movement type post to COPA or not?

Dear all,
Can any one tell me how to control if a movement type posted to COPA or not?
For example, movement type 201 (GI for cost center) only posted to cost center, movement type 901 (GI scrapping COPA) posting to COPA.
Actually I want to set one movement type for writeoff that posting to Cost Center and COPA.
Is it possible? And how?
Thanks a lot.
Kevin

Hi AP,
Yes, the COPA is active. Actually we already have posting to COPA.
My question is, material document for some movement types can post to COPA, and for other movement types can post to Cost Center.
I would like to know how to config the posting to COPA or Cost Center, and is it possible to post to COPA and Cost Center.
Thanks.

Bin determination in automatic TO creation for posting changes

Hello guys,
could someone provide some information or some links on how the automatic bin determination for posting changes will be processed in SAP WM?
Actually I'm looking for some further information for automated processing during a posting with movement type 309.
What data from the posting change will be taken into account for the automated bin determination?
Or is it 100 % comparable to the standard putaway / stock removal strategies?
Thanks for some hints on that.

Hi,
I would like to add a point here that there is possibility of transmitting a screen widow to hav the value of GR number. You can do the settings in OMLR in the AddlData for the appropriate Mvt (eg 321)
This will cause to have the GR number to the PCN, which is compared with the GR no in the quant existing, while creating the TO wrt PCN.
For eg: Material           Qty              Stk catgry                Bin                      GRno
                 A                  20                    Q                      B001                  5000000102
                 A                  40                    Q                      B003                  5000000140
Now, when transfering the stock category form Quality to unrestricted, for 20 qty, a PCN will be created bforethat a pop-up screen flows in which u'll b giving the GR no as 5000000140.
So u have the PCN for Qty 20, with GR no 5000000140.
When u create a TO wrt PCN, system will pick the stock from the bin B003.
I don't know how far this may light u.
Reg
Prasanna

KEFC - How value fields are determined ?

Hi Experts,
We just upload a file through transaction KEFC & it does automatic COPA postings . We want to understand how value fields & other relevant items in COPA posting are determined when we post through this transaction.
We went through KEFA & KEFB configurations but could not determine how values in text file are assigned to COPA Value fields.
Regards,
Santosh

Hi,
Let me try to answer your query since it is still unanswered.
From the upload file, COPA revenue and other sales value into the value fields.
If you have selected button for Valuation in KEFC screen, you will get all the cost components values of the cost estimate in the mapped value fields. This configuration is carried out
IMG -> Controlling -> Profitability Analysis -> Master Data -> Valuation -> Valuation using Material Cost Estimate.
Here you can select the point of valuation, for which material type and mapping of cost components to the value fields. I hope that I have answered your query. Let me know if not.
Cheers and Thanks in advance.

How to check COPA Data in R/3

Hi Experts,
There are some entries of COPA posted in BW are incorrect. Business wants to know who has posted these entries in R/3 . Could you please suggest me some transactions codes of R/3 for COPA related data so that I can investigate it.
The problem is with Profit Center and Sales District Data there are some extra entries for Profit centers not relevant to the Sales District assigned.
Reward points would not be a problem.
Thanks in advance.
BW USER

Hi,
Your records are in BW ?????do you have the CO_PA documnets number with you.???
then go to KE24 or KE25 as mentioned and here you can give the CO-PA doc number you will get a list of records just double on the recprds and it will take you the respective COPA docs....andhere check what is enetry maintained in the sales district field...and you can verifye whether the postings are correct or not.
These transactions are fast enough then the SE12 and RSA3.
try to give as much selection as possible when looking in KE24.
Thanks

Determine copa posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for