Determining size of pattern tiles in cc 2014

In previous versions of Photoshop, I could hover my cursor over the small tile window of a pattern and receive the specific size of any given pattern tile. In CC 2014, it doesn't happen. How can I determine the size of a seamless pattern tile I'm using in CC 2014?

I believe that's a bug in photoshop cc 2014 and hopefully will get fixed in the next update.
In the meantime you could get the size from the pattern display when using the Paint Bucket Tool set to pattern or Edit>Fill>Pattern.

Similar Messages

  • What is the viewable image area/screen size (length x width) on the 2014  21.5" and 27" imacs?

    what is the viewable image area/screen size (length x width) on the 2014  21.5" and 27" imacs? i have an older 24" and am trying to determine if i need to go up or if 21.5" will be adequate. Thanks!

    21.5 -
    Height: 17.7 inches (45.0 cm)
    Width: 20.8 inches (52.8 cm)
    27 -
    Height: 20.3 inches (51.60 cm)
    Width: 25.6 inches (65.0 cm)
    Ttake about an inch off for the lack border from each side and youll have an approximate.
    http://www.apple.com/imac/specs/

  • Why won't 'Transform Pattern Tiles' stay checked?

    It seems as though having this option in the Preferences unchecked is the default.  I work with pattern tiles a lot and I ALWAYS want them to scale and move etc... with the object they're applied to.  Every time I open an old file (from a previous version of AI where this option was checked) or start a new file, the option is unchecked, and I've really messed up some art when I've edited without realizing my pattern tiles aren't following along.
    How do I make this option persistant? It's driving me crazy that I always have to go in and check the damn little box before I can make any edits.
    BTW, I'm using AI CS6 through the cloud, so I should be all up to date.
    Thanks

    OK- I don't get it.  It seems to be working the way it's supposed to right now.  Since I wrote here last, I've been opening old files and opening new documents, and the box stays checked.  I've re-started Illustrator then opened old files and new documents and it's stayed checked.  I re-started my computer then started Illustrator and opened old files and new documents and the box has stayed checked.  This is how it's supposed to be- so now I can't figure out how it has gotten unchecked in the past. 
    I do mockups of my company's pajamas and use pattern tiles to represent the pattern on the pajama fabric.  The size of the pattern compared to the pajama as a whole is very important, so I NEVER deliberately turn 'Transform Pattern Tiles' off.  I ALWAYS want it on.  I've only ever checked the box to turn it back on when I've noticed that my pattern tiles aren't behaving the way they should.  I've been using CS6 since last November (older versions of Illustrator for years before that), and have had to keep checking the box time after time with this version.  And right before starting this thread I had just opened a new document, applied a  pattern tile, and noticed it wasn't behaving properly.  So I checked Preferences, and, sure enough, 'Transform Pattern Tiles' was unchecked. 
    I haven't had any other problems with Preferences- no crashes, nothing else resetting or anything that I've noticed.  Maybe there's something in my workflow that's causing it that I don't know about.  I just tried changing the Profile when opening a new document back and forth between a preset like 'Print' and 'Custom' (by changing the default Units as I sometimes do), and the box is staying checked the way it's supposed to. 
    I don't know what I'm doing wrong, but I guess I'll keep checking to see if I can narrow it down. 
    Thanks for the replies.

  • Is it possible to change the CATEGORY TITLE font color and/or size of each tile group in start screen, when the tiles are sorted by CATEGORY?

    TIA.

    Q.  Is it possible to change the CATEGORY TITLE font color and/or size of each tile group in start screen, when the tiles are sorted by CATEGORY?
    A.  No
    Carey Frisch

  • Determine size of pdf from spool

    All,
    does anyone know how to determine size of pdf from spool.
    i'm using RSPO_RETURN_ABAP_SPOOLJOB to get pdf file, but i want to know its size.
    any idea?

    Assume the PDF data is in internal table gt_messg_att.
    MOVE p_spoolno TO lv_spoolno.
    * CONVERT THE SPOOL TO PDF
      CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERT_OTFSPOOLJOB_2_PDF'
        EXPORTING
          src_spoolid                    = lv_spoolno
          no_dialog                      = lc_no_dialog
    *     DST_DEVICE                     =
    *     PDF_DESTINATION                =
       IMPORTING
         pdf_bytecount                  = lv_bytecount
    *     PDF_SPOOLID                    =
    *     OTF_PAGECOUNT                  =
    *     BTC_JOBNAME                    =
    *     BTC_JOBCOUNT                   =
       TABLES
         pdf                            = gt_pdf_output
       EXCEPTIONS
         err_no_otf_spooljob            = 1
         err_no_spooljob                = 2
         err_no_permission              = 3
         err_conv_not_possible          = 4
         err_bad_dstdevice              = 5
         user_cancelled                 = 6
         err_spoolerror                 = 7
         err_temseerror                 = 8
         err_btcjob_open_failed         = 9
         err_btcjob_submit_failed       = 10
         err_btcjob_close_failed        = 11
         OTHERS                         = 12
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
        MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
                WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
      ELSE.
    * Transfer the 132-long strings to 255-long strings
        LOOP AT gt_pdf_output INTO wa_pdf_output.
          TRANSLATE wa_pdf_output USING ' ~'.
          CONCATENATE v_buffer wa_pdf_output INTO v_buffer.
          MODIFY gt_pdf_output FROM wa_pdf_output.
          CLEAR wa_pdf_output.
        ENDLOOP.
    * TO CONVERT THE DATA INTO PDF FORMAT ELSE THE PDF FILE
    * WON'T OPEN & REPORT WOULD GIVE A MESSAGE THAT
    * THE FILE IS DAMAGED & COULD NOT BE OPENED
        TRANSLATE v_buffer USING '~ '.
        CLEAR : wa_messg_att,
                gt_messg_att.
        DO.
          wa_messg_att = v_buffer.
          APPEND wa_messg_att TO gt_messg_att.
          SHIFT v_buffer LEFT BY 255 PLACES.
          IF v_buffer IS INITIAL.
            EXIT.
          ENDIF.
          CLEAR wa_messg_att.
        ENDDO.
      ENDIF.
    * Get size of attachment
      DESCRIBE TABLE gt_messg_att LINES lv_cnt.
      READ TABLE gt_messg_att INTO wa_messg_att INDEX lv_cnt.
      lwa_doc_data-doc_size =  ( lv_cnt - 1 ) * 255 + STRLEN( wa_messg_att ).

  • Unwanted paths showing after cropping to make a repeat pattern tile.

    I'm trying to make a repeat pattern tile (using CS5 on Windows 7), but when I crop the pattern, the expanded paths underneath become visible as on the flowers below.
    This is what I did after creating the artwork:
    Used the rectangle tool to make a box with fill/stroke directly on top of the artboard..
    Select all > Expand (selecting stroke only, not fill)
    Deselect the cropping box and grouped the remaining objects.
    Reselected the cropping box and grouped all objects
    Pathfinder > Crop
    I'm guessing it may have something to do with the fact I used a gradient on the flowers but have no idea how to resolve it. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks.
    PS. Please excuse me if this explanation is really poorly worded...I've only ever used Illustrator for fashion technical sketches so my knowledge is pretty limited.

    Followed your advice above, and hopefully it will work. The only issue is it's a bit time consuming they way I'm doing it, as I'm having to delete the outermost objects first, then delete any objects which are partially inside the rectangle, otherwise I find some of the objects inside the rectangle are deleted too:
    At the moment for the objects that are partially inside the box, I'm using the scissors tool to cut the path where it crosses the rectangle. Is there an easier solution to this problem?

  • File size bloat still evident in CC 2014.1 (or just stabilization?)

    In the last couple of nights, the project I am working on (originally imported from 2014.0) has gone from 3MB to 16MB to 61MB without any new importing or explicit rendering.
    It's a small project. A single 10-minute sequence with perhaps 16 master clips, most used 4-5 times or less. There's a lot of primary and secondary color correction (half to master clips) and vignettes, but not an excessive amount. I am new to Premiere Pro (but very very smitten with it ).
    I have done most of my warp stabilizing over the last few nights (corresponding, perhaps coincidentally, with the 2014.1 update). Several people on these forums have suggested that the project file storage of warp stabilization data is to blame, but I have not heard this from Adobe and, as a software developer, that doesn't make sense to me. (I would think that the product of warp stabilization needn't be more than the stabilization "solution", an overall zoom value and an x,y for each frame.)
    If additional "hint" data from the stabilization is also stored in the project file to help with future re-stabilizations, this would explain the growing file size but the optimization seems to be hurting more than helping. The clips took only 5-10 seconds each to stabilize initially and I lose that time with every auto-save. In addition, the performance of unrendered playback has suffered significantly on my Win7 i7 16Gb with 1100 CUDA cores.
    If it is warp stabilization data, it would be good to know. I can disable auto-saves for now and, in the future, ensure that stabilization is done much later in the workflow.
    I also want to thank you folks for all for the answers you provide here -- I have learned a huge amount from this community!

    To be fair, the stabilization solution is more than just a 2-D offset, it's a warp stabilizer, after all.
    I did a quick test using 3 of the 6 unstable master shots in a new project and made 6 clips overall to make a small representation of my larger project. As warp stabilization was added, the file size grew from 150k to 4MB.
    Scaling this growth up to match the relative number of clips in my full project, it roughly matches. So question answered, I suppose.
    The performance hit on adjustment visual feedback and playback has me seriously considering removing all the stabilization and repeating it closer to end of editing.

  • Why there is a huge difference between a row size on a disk based table and a row size in memoptimized table of SQL 2014?

    Hi All,
    I have two table with similar structure and data, one is on disk and the other is in memory. I somehow calculated the difference between a row size of on disk and in memory table and found that the row size of in memory is 700 Bytes more than the disk based
    tables.
    aa

    As others mentioned, memory optimized tables and disk based tables have different structures in SQL Server 2014.
    For memory optimized tables, the number of indexes on table also contribute to the size. You can calculate the exact size of rows and thus the table size using the formula given in the below articles
    Table and Row Size in Memory-Optimized Tables
    Estimate the Size of a Table
    Krishnakumar S

  • Reducing size of pattern in Layers Style

    Hello.
    I'm using Photoshop CS3 and CS6 and have one strange problem.
    Working with Pattern Overlay menu I set 99% (or less) size of image and unfortunately quality is reducing.
    This is very strange.
    100% image scale (original) have great quality
    101% is OK
    but 99% is awful!
    80%.. 70%.. terrible!
    Why? I'm just trying to reduce it!
    The less percent I choose the more bad quality I have.

    This is example
    (screenshot):
    link
    On the left side the image resized to 99% by Scale function in Pattern Overlay
    On the right side - the image scaled to the same size by Edit - Transform - Scale
    The difference between images is great!
    -- Update:
    Another example using simple lines:

  • Determining size of objects

    hi , is there any way we can determine the size of objects in java ,like we have sizeof() in C. because till now I have only found functions in runtime class to determie the mem. as total OR max. OR free

    In Java 1.5 is the Instrumentation package which can provide something like Object sizes. Never used it myself, though.

  • Inventory to determine size of a folder on workstation

    I am trying to see if I can determine the size of a folder on an inventoried workstation. I am trying to find a way to determine the size of the GW archive folder (always named of???arc). Is this possible?
    thanks

    What you're asking for is, I think, really outside ZAM's scope. The Collector can indeed return files from a directory on the workstation to the central database, but the size of those files is limited... and for very good reason. Network bandwidth would suffer terribly if every scan resulted in gigs of returned (collected) files, and the database would bloat beyond belief with one copy of each file from each workstation in the enterprise.
    One way to get closer to what you're asking for would be to pipe DIR directly into a file somewhere on the box, then have the scan return that file. The contents of that "DIR" file can be easily displayed from a ZAM Manager (and, I think, the WebConsole... but I'm not terribly familiar with the WC).
    The DIR file (suggested name: DIR.TXT) would contain the full list of those files by name, including their individual and collective sizes.
    ZAM's purpose is automatically inventorying "Products", or "Assets", and not so much "Data" except in the sense of data about those products.
    -- Tim --
    Originally Posted by JFerris
    Agreed...but if I had to go to that much work, why would I need the product at all? I see in reports that I should be able to return the files located in a particular directory (though I haven't been able to get that to actually function). If I can get the list of files and sizes, I'm good. So maybe my question is how do I get a report of files and their sizes in a defined folder?

  • Determining Size of Requests & Responses

    Hi there,
    I'm looking for a reliable and consistent means of determining the size of data transferred between clients and Servlet-based server-side applications over HTTP.
    I've been exploring doing this with a Servlet Filter which would attempt to measure the size of the HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse objects passing through it.
    While I've been able to write code to measure the size of an HttpServletRequest (by inspecting headers and body content), doing so for responses appears to be more error prone, because the HttpServletResponse interface does not expose accessors to items such as headers and status messages.
    The only solution I can think of is to use a custom HttpServletResponseWrapper implementation which would track data size of calls to mutator methods such as setHeader() and setStatus().
    However, it's not guaranteed that all of the headers and status messages encapsulated in the response, such as those created by the Servlet Engine itself, will be added through the API (rather than the underlying impl), making this approach error-prone at best.
    Can anyone suggest a more reliable means of measuring the amount of data being transferred between the client and server tiers?
    Any suggestions or comments are greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Sasha Haghani.

    Could you not get the content length by extending HttpServletResponseWrapper in this manner:
    public class CustomResponseWrapper extends HttpServletResponseWrapper
    private int contentLength;
    public CustomResponseWrapper(HttpServletResponse response)
    super(response);
    public void setContentLength(int length)
    this.contentLength = length;
    super.setContentLength(length);
    public int getContentLength()
    return contentLength;
    Then after the filter is invoked with doFilter, you could get the content length.
    Apologies if I'm not understanding your situation.

  • Encrypted .dmg - determining size

    When creating an encrypted .dmg - at what point in the process can you determine the size of the initial image so that it will accommodate future additional files?
    Please keep it simple ... and thanks in advance.

    seventy one wrote:
    When creating an encrypted .dmg - at what point in the process can you determine the size of the initial image so that it will accommodate future additional files?
    At the very beginning When you click New Image in the disk utility. You can choose the volume size.
    Just make it large enough.
    You can always create a new, larger encrypted image later and move everything into it.
    Please keep it simple ... and thanks in advance.
    Message was edited by: nerowolfe

  • Determine size of component at runtime

    I'm trying to build a Paginagion component of a fixed size. Meaning the size of the pagination is fixed, however based on the content the number of pages may vary. Further more it should not be defined how much is displayed on a single page.
    The idea is to use text as input and push as much as can be displayed on the page. Factors that have an influence here is font and formatting.
    To determine the page that should be shown I have to figure out the amount of text that can be displayed. To do so I need to know the size of the component containing the text (think Label). The size of the label however is only determined after it is layouted. So here is what I could do:
        @Override
        public void start(Stage primaryStage) {
            Label lbl = new Label("uitroweigudfgf jkfhgklfsjghslkghs kflgskjgh");
            System.out.println(lbl.getWidth()+","+lbl.getHeight());
            lbl.widthProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener<Number>(){
                @Override
                public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends Number> ov, Number t, Number t1) {
                    System.out.println(lbl.getWidth()+","+lbl.getHeight());
            lbl.heightProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener<Number>(){
                @Override
                public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends Number> ov, Number t, Number t1) {
                    System.out.println(lbl.getWidth()+","+lbl.getHeight());
            StackPane root = new StackPane();
            root.getChildren().add(lbl);
            Scene scene = new Scene(root, 300, 250);
            primaryStage.setTitle("Hello World!");
            primaryStage.setScene(scene);
            primaryStage.show();
    After the third change I have the dimensions of the label. With this method I would have to push the whole text into labels to figure out how much can be displayed.
    Is there any better method to do this?

    Have not tried that yet, but will hopefully come around to it. I tried to us a size change listener on the label using this base implementation of a ChangeListener:
    package javafxtest.label;
    import javafx.beans.value.ChangeListener;
    import javafx.beans.value.ObservableValue;
    public class SizeChangeListener implements ChangeListener<Number>{
        private volatile int sizeChangeCounter = 0;
        @Override
        public final void changed(ObservableValue<? extends Number> observable, Number oldValue, Number newValue) {
    System.out.println("New value: "+newValue+", counter="+sizeChangeCounter);
            if (sizeChangeCounter < 1) { // one change for height one for width
    System.out.println("Increase counter");
                sizeChangeCounter++;
            } else {
                sizeChangeCounter++;
                executeOnSizeChange();
        protected void executeOnSizeChange() {
            while (!stopCriteriumReached()) {
                System.out.println("Execute on after a sizeChange");
        private boolean flag = true;
        protected boolean stopCriteriumReached() {
            flag = !flag;
            return flag;
    And here is the application for testing:
    package javafxtest.label;
    import javafx.application.Application;
    import javafx.event.ActionEvent;
    import javafx.event.EventHandler;
    import javafx.scene.Scene;
    import javafx.scene.control.Button;
    import javafx.scene.control.Label;
    import javafx.scene.layout.StackPane;
    import javafx.stage.Stage;
    public class LabelGrowingSizeChangeTest extends Application {
        @Override
        public void start(Stage primaryStage) {
            Label lbl = new Label(" ");
            MySizeChangeListener changeListener = new MySizeChangeListener(lbl, 250);
            lbl.widthProperty().addListener(changeListener);
            lbl.heightProperty().addListener(changeListener);
            StackPane root = new StackPane();
            root.getChildren().add(lbl);
            Scene scene = new Scene(root, 300, 250);
            primaryStage.setTitle("Hello World!");
            primaryStage.setScene(scene);
            primaryStage.show();
        public static void main(String[] args) {
            launch(args);
        private static class MySizeChangeListener extends SizeChangeListener {
            private final Label label;
            private final double width;
            public MySizeChangeListener(Label label, double width) {
                this.label = label;
                this.width = width;
            @Override
            protected void executeOnSizeChange() {
                while (!stopCriteriumReached()) {
    System.out.println("Add text");
                    label.textProperty().concat(" blah");
                    //label.setText(label.getText()+" blah");
    The curious thing is that I get the println from line 48, but the label does not get updated. Has anyone an idea why that is?

  • Determining size of CursoredStream

    Hello,
    we are developing a system using Toplink. One of our functions uses a CursoredStream to read the result set in sections from the server. The data read query is built "manually" due to complexity reasons. The query needs an additional count query to determine the size of the result set. Now we found that the execution of this count query causes a loss of performance. Is there any other way to determine the result set's size avoiding the count query to be executed? We tried to loop through the CursoredStream to count its elements but this is even slower for large result sets...
    Any help is appreciated!
    Thank you in advance!
    Danilo Gld_l

    Hello,
    thank you for your answer. By now, I tried the following:
    (1) Loop through the CursoredStream and count its objects:
         aCursoredStream = (CursoredStream) getClientSession().executeQuery(aReadAllQuery);
         int size = 0;
         aCursoredStream.mark(1);
         while (!aCursoredStream.atEnd()) {
              aCursoredStream.read();
              size++;
         aCursoredStream.setSize(size);
         aCursoredStream.reset();
    (2) Loop through the CursoredStream and read its object in sections:
         aCursoredStream = (CursoredStream) getClientSession().executeQuery(aReadAllQuery);
         int size = 0;
         int stepSize = 100; // also tried other values without mentionable performance differences
         aCursoredStream.mark(1);
         while (!aCursoredStream.atEnd()) {
              try {
                   aCursoredStream.read(stepSize);
              } catch (QueryException exc) {
                   stepSize = stepSize / 2;
                   continue;
              size += stepSize;
         aCursoredStream.setSize(size);
         aCursoredStream.reset();
    (3) Filter CursoredStream size from Exception message:
         aCursoredStream = (CursoredStream) getClientSession().executeQuery(aReadAllQuery);
         int size = 0;
         int stepSize = Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1;
         // initialize field for "position" attribute of the cursored stream
         Field positionField = null;
         // store page size of cursored stream's policy
         int pageSize = aCursoredStream.getPolicy().getPageSize();
         aCursoredStream.mark(1);
         // set policy's page size to maximal integer to avoid exception when changing position and reading
         aCursoredStream.getPolicy().setPageSize(stepSize + 1);
         try {
              // fetch "position" attribute of the cursored stream and make it accessible
              positionField = aCursoredStream.getClass().getDeclaredField("position");
              positionField.setAccessible(true);
         } catch (NoSuchFieldException exc) {
              exc.printStackTrace();
         // while cursor is not at the stream's end yet (should never happen)     
         while (!aCursoredStream.atEnd()) {
              try {
                   // set "position" to actual position (should always be 0) plus step
                   // must happen via reflection because there is not any setter available
                   positionField.set(aCursoredStream,
                                  new Integer(aCursoredStream.getPosition() + stepSize));
                   try {
                        // try to read the next element from the stream
                        aCursoredStream.read();
                   } catch (QueryException exc) {
                        // exception since stream size is not greater than the initial read size of
                        // cursor policy
                        // reset the cursor and the size counter
                        aCursoredStream.reset();
                        size = 0;
                        // while cursor is not at the stream's end yet
                        while (!aCursoredStream.atEnd()) {
                             // read an element from the stream
                             aCursoredStream.read();
                             // and increment the size counter
                             size++;
                        // leave the outer while loop
                        break;
              } catch (IllegalAccessException exc) {
                   exc.printStackTrace();
              } catch (ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException exc) {
                   // exception since element at position of maximal integer does not exist
                   // filter size from exception message and leave while loop
                   size = new Integer(exc.getMessage().
                                  substring(exc.getMessage().lastIndexOf(" ") + 1)).intValue();
                   break;
         // if size could be determined, provide it to cursored stream
         if (size != 0) {
              aCursoredStream.setSize(size);
         // reset cursor policy's page size to initial value
         aCursoredStream.getPolicy().setPageSize(pageSize);
         // reset cursor position
         aCursoredStream.reset();
    The third option proved to be a little bit faster than the other two. But it is still slower than the COUNT(*) query for large result sets depending on the query. We are talking about result sets comprising some thousand records. Depending on the complexity of the query, the count query takes longer than the data query - for whatever reasons...
    The data query always contains several ORDER BY criteria. So, in my opinion, the database has to process the complete result set (or at least all entries of the ORDER BY columns) to correctly sort it. Am I wrong if I assume that it has to know the record count afterwards? My intention is to retrieve this size with the least performance effort...
    Nevertheless I will try your suggestion to retrieve the count by executing a ReportQuery. Thank you.
    At the moment I am trying to use a ScrollableCursor to retrieve its size as follows:
         if (aScrollableCursor.last()) {
              aScrollableCursor.setSize(aScrollableCursor.currentIndex());
              aScrollableCursorResultSet.setSize(aScrollableCursor.getSize());
              aScrollableCursor.first();
    Performance tests are pending...
    Danilo Gld_l

Maybe you are looking for