Difference between the binding and the value attribute of an Oracle ADF com

Can somebody please tell me the difference between
the binding attribute and the value attribute of any oracle ADF component such as inputText and when would we use one over the other.
THanks,

Value represent the value that is going to be displayed by the item.
Binding indicate the backing bean object that represents the instance of the component.

Similar Messages

What's the difference between Java SDK and the Enterprise Edition?

What's the difference between Java SDK and the Enterprise Edition? Are they both free?

both r free but they are used in diffrent applications. sdk are used for simple apps that run on your computer while j2e (enterprise edition) are ment for large distributed computer systems that include servers and such. if you don't know the diffrence you probably wont need the the j2e, only the sdk.

BCT - how to find the difference between installed BCT and the newest BCT?

Hi,
How do I find the difference between installed BCT and the newest BCT?
or find a description of the newest BCT?
Thank you.
- Gunnar

Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
I am aware of the possibilities you mention.
I am looking for a way to find the parts of the business content that has been modified since I installed our current version WITHOUT installing anything.
That is for example:
If F&R business content has been moved from 3.x technology to 7.0
If there is changes to the F&R content at all
-> if our current version of business content already contains the newest version of Business Content for F&R, then it is not a prerequirement to an F&R project that we update business content.
The possibility to see that the only changes might be in the area of SAP HCM ...
Thank you.
- Gunnar

Exact difference between System status and the user status

Hi,
Please tell me the exact difference between System status and the user status .
how we customize the both in the system
Thanks & Regards
Prajith P
Moderation: Locked. Please, try to find an answer first. See rules of engagement
Edited by: Joaquin Fornas on Feb 23, 2012 11:14 AM

Hi,
As you mentioned there are 2 status can be maintained for documents like Equipment Master, Notification, Maintenance Order & other important business documents.
In case, client feels that system status is not enough to capture the details of the object, then user status can be used.
System statuses will be updated automatically based on business transactions which will be done on SAP.
For example, once the equipment is created, System status would CRTD (Created). If you install the same to some superior equipment or FL, then status would be INST (Installed).
If you keeping that equipment in Spare, then for that, you have to maintain separate User Status like AVLB (Available in Stock / Spare) so that through IH08, by using User status, you can the report which is available as spare.
These user status as per the name, should be updated by the user manually.
Regards,
Maheswaran.

What is the difference between partition-count and the number of caches?

What is the difference between partition-count and the number of caches in Coherence? Are they same?

Those are totally orthogonal concepts.
For more, look at this thread where I answered your other related questions and explain this, too:
Where can I find the accurate definitions of these terms?
Best regards,
Robert

[svn] 4112: Further work for FXG to SWF transcoding - checking in some work resulting from collaborating with Kaushal to correct FXG transforms and gradient transforms as well as cater for differences between Java AffineTransform and the SWF Matrix type .

Revision: 4112
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-11-14 10:05:42 -0800 (Fri, 14 Nov 2008)
Log Message:
Further work for FXG to SWF transcoding - checking in some work resulting from collaborating with Kaushal to correct FXG transforms and gradient transforms as well as cater for differences between Java AffineTransform and the SWF Matrix type.
QE: Not yet.
Doc: No
Checkintests: Pass
Reviewer: Kaushal
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fxg/dom/GraphicContentNode.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fxg/dom/fills/LinearGradientFillNode.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fxg/dom/fills/RadialGradientFillNode.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fxg/dom/strokes/LinearGradientStrokeNode.j ava
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fxg/dom/strokes/RadialGradientStrokeNode.j ava
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fxg/swf/AbstractFXGGraphics.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fxg/swf/TypeHelper.java
Added Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fxg/dom/ScalableGradientNode.java

Difference between hierarchy node and single value

Hi experts,
Can anyone explain me the difference between hierarchy node and single value?
This is my problem:
I have a query that uses a characteristic (0ORGUNIT) with a hierarchy and I execute it without any problem but when I try to set a fliter on this characteristic and I try to find a single value, for example 101, it doesn't appear in the single value list, instead it appears in the hierarchy nodes list in the selection window.
I think I'm confused about both terms because I thought a hierarchy node was always the one who has one or more values as its lower levels like this:
A. 10
    A1. 100
    A2. 101
    A3. 102
         A3.1. 1021
B. 11
I this case I thought , for example, 101 was a single value but not a hierarchy node so I must find it in the single values list in the selection window, however, 102 can be both and must appear in both lists, is it true?
Thanks in advanced

In BW, hierarchy node with more information compare to the single value. for example, it always carries its father node information, which it belongs to. and some time information if it is time-dependent.
So, when you using hierarchy node, it means at least 2 information: value and "position" (who is its father node)
That's the reason why you see the hierarchy tree when choosing the node.
If you want to expand the hierarchy to the certain level, you can setting in the property. Another choice is restrict in the query designer.

Difference between using Binding and Value Attribute

what is the deference between using binding and value attribute, when I use binding attribute at the time of Value change listener is behaving like action listener,
Ex:
If I use value attribute, at the time of value change listener the component is not showing the result in the component but when I use Binding attribute it is happening automatically. So I want to know how the binding attribute is working.
I know, at the time of binding attribute the component is creating an instance at the bean side, So even also how it is following the life cycle of the JSF Frame work, and also Please suggest me weather which one is better to use either Binding or Value?

JNaveen wrote:
If I use value attribute, at the time of value change listener the component is not showing the result in the component but when I use Binding attribute it is happening automatically. So I want to know how the binding attribute is working.You need to learn about the JSF lifecycle. The ValueChangeEvent is invoked after conversion and validation in the 3rd phase, while the model values are updated in the 4th phase. In the valueChangeListener method you normally use ValueChangeEvent#getNewValue() to get the new value after the change.
I know, at the time of binding attribute the component is creating an instance at the bean side, So even also how it is following the life cycle of the JSF Frame work, and also Please suggest me weather which one is better to use either Binding or Value?Use the 'value' attribute to bind the value to the bean. Use the 'binding' attribute to bind the component to the bean. If you don't need to precreate the component or do other things than getting/setting its value, then there is no need for the 'binding' attribute.
Read on those links if you want to know something more about the JSF lifecycle:
[http://balusc.blogspot.com/2006/09/debug-jsf-lifecycle.html].
[http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr252/index.html] (pick 1st download).

Is there a difference between Statement Cache and the statement handle!

Hello!
The OCI statement cache is !session! wide. When I have a sql statement that was used before, I can use this feature.
But what is the difference between this feature and my statement handle for a certain sql statement that I can store and reuse a second time?
My stored statement handle is already prepared and the placeholders are bound. The second time I only have to copy new values in the memory positions and do an execute and that's all.
Thank you in advance
Wolfgang

The underlying optimization is the same. When you re-execute a statement, you are reusing the metadata already available in the statement and the cursor already open on the server. If you know exactly the set of statements that you are going to execute repeatedly, you can maintain the cache on your own. (Yes, you save on doing the Bind/Define calls multiple times).
OCI Statement cache makes it transparent and the application does not need to keep the references/indexes to the relevant statements. Also once a cache size is set, least recently used statements get out of the cache when the cache is full and needs to accommodate more.
To optimize the bind/defines on the statements from the statement cache, you can use this feature:
http://www.filibeto.org/sun/lib/nonsun/oracle/11.2.0.1.0/E11882_01/appdev.112/e10646/oci09adv.htm#sthref1358

On differences between JavaFX CSS and the w3c standard css

This is a discussion topic which came to mind after reading comments in this thread Re: FXML, css and -fx-font-family
Feel free to comment or share your thoughts on the topic.
Note that these comments relate to the naming and semantic meanings of css tags, and not the syntax and parsing of css (as both w3c css and javaFX css seem to be equivalent in the later regard).
You know, sometimes I find JavaFX's lack of certain css features refreshing. It is nice to have all, well, almost all, of the JavaFX CSS documented on one page. I think if you were to do the same thing for w3c css then it would end up with a much larger, more difficult to understand document and even what the contents of that document should be would probably be pretty controversial, in the same kind of way that the HTML5 specification ended up being. Microsoft contributed over 7000 tests to w3c just to cover only a subset of the css rules available in browsers today. The webkit project lists almost a thousand open CSS bugs: https://bugs.webkit.org/buglist.cgi?product=WebKit&component=CSS&resolution=---. So implementing even partial w3c CSS support is a complex project.
When I first started using JavaFX CSS I found the differences to w3c CSS quite jarring, and it was hard to account for them. Now that I am used to JavaFX CSS, I don't have as much of an issue. The difference in names and semantics is going to be an impediment to designers working on JavaFX who are familar with w3c CSS - but the designers will quickly also discover that FXML is not HTML and Java is not JavaScript and JavaFX deployment is not HTML deployment. So, perhaps, in the larger picture, it is not as big a deal as it would seem. Still, one can't help think that any impediment to people easily picking up and adopting JavaFX is doing the technology a disservice.
There are other advantages in having the JavaFX CSS in it's own namespace to w3c css, in that it can evolve seperately, it is not expected to be exactly the same because it has a different name, it is not expected to fully implement w3c css as browsers do because it's clearly a different thing by name, etc. There is even precedent for it in the use by mozilla of moz- CSS prefixes and webkit css properties http://css-infos.net/properties/webkit - the web as not as standard as a lot of people propose. JavaFX CSS is backing a JavaFX rendering engine and not an HTML rendering engine. It is quite remarkable that Oracle was able to build and make available a CSS model for JavaFX that feels as familar as it does to w3c css, as w3c css is targeted very strongly toward styling a completely different technology set (HTML markup and document object model).
It would be useful to have a tool which translates w3c css to approximations of JavaFX css and vice versa, or the ability for JavaFX to have a mode (perhaps a boolean value when a stylesheet is loaded) to perform an automatic alias or mapping of w3c css to javafx (at least for the subset of w3c css which would make sense to automatically translate to JavaFX css). I haven't checked the JavaFX jira in detail, so perhaps a request for such support already exists - perhaps it is under the private http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-9272 jira.
The JavaFX css model is really powerful and I have found really useful some of the additions that it adds above the baseline 2.1 css that is found consistently in browsers. With the upcoming Java CSS object model http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-17293, you will also get better programmatic access from Java.
So, nice work on building and implementing this complex feature . . .

Thanks for the feedback. Closing the gap between JavaFX CSS and W3C CSS will be an evolutionary process. It would be nice to use a standard's based stylesheet but there is not always a 1-1 mapping to JavaFX. But for those properties that can be mapped, it is something that should be supported. For example, we should be able to handle "font" or "-fx-font".
I have made http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-9272 public.

Difference between promotional macbook and the normal priced macbook?

is there any difference between the promotional ones eg. back to sch promo..and the normal priced macbook? from what i heard there some difference in the component (maybe cheaper components?) they use in the promo macbooks..hope to enlighten me thanks..

If Apple were making a special MacBook for this promo it would actually cost Apple more from having to make a separate production run not to mention more in technical support.
The promo is a simple back to school promo. Nothing more.

Difference Between Class & Characterstics and the Tcodes to create them ?

Hi All,
I want to know the difference between the Class & Characterstics ? And the transaction codes to create them ?
Can any one provide me clear information ?
Answers will be rewarded,
Thanks in advance.

Hello The Rock,
Class is a group of similar objects described by means of characterstics
that they have in common
Tcode - CL02
This class is used to hold the characterstics that describe a configurable
material . The characterstics are attached to the class.
Characterstics are used to define the features of a configurable material
The Tcode to create charcterstics is CT04
Reward if this information is useful.
Regards,
Suresh Babu.S

What is the difference between regular FaceTime and the Mac App Store FaceTime?

The one in the App Store costs €0,89. How is this one differend?

Yup.
The difference is about a bit.
It's a bit that, when set, allows a database to be in a permanent state of recovery, allowing repeated applications of redo. When a particular recovery operation has finished applying its quota of redo, the database sits there waiting for the next dollop.
A normal controlfile doesn't have that bit set, and when you do 'recover database' to it, it gets to the end of the redo stream and says 'Media Recovery Complete'. No further redo can then be applied to that database, meaning you can't keep a normal database in a permanent state of being recovered.

Difference between abstract class and the normal class

Hi...........
can anyone tell me use of abstract class instead of normal class
The main doubt for me is...
1.why we are defining the abstract method in a abstract class and then implementing that in to the normal class.instead of that we can straight way create and implement the method in normal class right...../

Class vs. interface
Some say you should define all classes in terms of interfaces, but I think recommendation seems a bit extreme. I use interfaces when I see that something in my design will change frequently.
For example, the Strategy pattern lets you swap new algorithms and processes into your program without altering the objects that use them. A media player might know how to play CDs, MP3s, and wav files. Of course, you don't want to hardcode those playback algorithms into the player; that will make it difficult to add a new format like AVI. Furthermore, your code will be littered with useless case statements. And to add insult to injury, you will need to update those case statements each time you add a new algorithm. All in all, this is not a very object-oriented way to program.
With the Strategy pattern, you can simply encapsulate the algorithm behind an object. If you do that, you can provide new media plug-ins at any time. Let's call the plug-in class MediaStrategy. That object would have one method: playStream(Stream s). So to add a new algorithm, we simply extend our algorithm class. Now, when the program encounters the new media type, it simply delegates the playing of the stream to our media strategy. Of course, you'll need some plumbing to properly instantiate the algorithm strategies you will need.
This is an excellent place to use an interface. We've used the Strategy pattern, which clearly indicates a place in the design that will change. Thus, you should define the strategy as an interface. You should generally favor interfaces over inheritance when you want an object to have a certain type; in this case, MediaStrategy. Relying on inheritance for type identity is dangerous; it locks you into a particular inheritance hierarchy. Java doesn't allow multiple inheritance, so you can't extend something that gives you a useful implementation or more type identity.
Interface vs. abstract class
Choosing interfaces and abstract classes is not an either/or proposition. If you need to change your design, make it an interface. However, you may have abstract classes that provide some default behavior. Abstract classes are excellent candidates inside of application frameworks.
Abstract classes let you define some behaviors; they force your subclasses to provide others. For example, if you have an application framework, an abstract class may provide default services such as event and message handling. Those services allow your application to plug in to your application framework. However, there is some application-specific functionality that only your application can perform. Such functionality might include startup and shutdown tasks, which are often application-dependent. So instead of trying to define that behavior itself, the abstract base class can declare abstract shutdown and startup methods. The base class knows that it needs those methods, but an abstract class lets your class admit that it doesn't know how to perform those actions; it only knows that it must initiate the actions. When it is time to start up, the abstract class can call the startup method. When the base class calls this method, Java calls the method defined by the child class.

How do I tell the difference between iPad 2 and the New iPad because they both look the same?

The box says iPad. How do I tell that I bought iPad or the new iPad? There is no way to tell the cpu is the new one or the camera is better when this is my first apple product.I have nothing to compare with.

Here's the various iPad model numbers and order numbers. The model numbers are on the back of the iPad
Apple iPad Wi-Fi (Original) 16, 32, 64 GB
The wi-fi only iPad configurations are assigned model number A1219.
MB292LL/A is the order number for the 16 GB configuration. The 32 GB configuration is assigned MB293LL/A and the 64 GB configuration is assigned MB294LL/A.
Apple iPad Wi-Fi/3G/GPS (Original) 16, 32, 64 GB
The Wi-Fi/3G/A-GPS iPad configurations are assigned model number A1337.
MC349LL/A is the order number for the 16 GB configuration. The 32 GB configuration is assigned MC496LL/A and the 64 GB configuration is assigned MC497LL/A.
Apple iPad 2 (Wi-Fi Only) 16, 32, 64 GB
The wi-fi only iPad 2 configurations are assigned model number A1395.
MC769LL/A is the original order number for the 16 GB configuration in black. The 32 GB configuration in black is assigned MC770LL/A and the 64 GB configuration in black is assigned MC916LL/A. The original 16 GB, 32 GB and 64 GB configurations in white are assigned MC979LL/A, MC980LL/A, and MC981LL/A, respectively. On March 7, 2012, Apple discontinued the 32 GB and 64 GB configurations and assigned new order numbers of MC954LL/A and MC989LL/A for the black and white 16 GB configurations, respectively.
Apple iPad 2 (Wi-Fi/GSM/GPS AT&T) 16, 32, 64 GB
The Wi-Fi/GSM/GPS iPad 2 configurations are assigned model number A1396.
MC773LL/A is the original order number for the 16 GB configuration in black. The 32 GB configuration in black is assigned MC774LL/A and the 64 GB configuration in black is assigned MC775LL/A. The original 16 GB, 32 GB and 64 GB configurations in white are assigned MC982LL/A, MC983LL/A, and MC984LL/A, respectively. On March 7, 2012, Apple discontinued the 32 GB and 64 GB configurations and assigned new order numbers of MC957LL/A and MC992LL/A for the black and white 16 GB configurations, respectively.
Apple iPad 2 (Wi-Fi/CDMA/GPS Verizon) 16, 32, 64 GB
The Wi-Fi/CDMA/GPS iPad 2 configurations are assigned model number A1397.
MC755LL/A is the original order number for the 16 GB configuration in black. The 32 GB configuration in black is assigned MC763LL/A and the 64 GB configuration in black is assigned MC764LL/A. The original 16 GB, 32 GB and 64 GB configurations in white are assigned MC985LL/A, MC986LL/A, and MC987LL/A, respectively. On March 7, 2012, Apple discontinued the 32 GB and 64 GB configurations and assigned new order numbers of MC755LL/A and MC985LL/A for the black and white 16 GB configurations, respectively.
Apple iPad 3rd Gen (Wi-Fi Only) 16, 32, 64 GB
The Wi-Fi Only iPad 3 configurations are assigned model number A1416
MC705LL/A refers to the 16 GB configuration in black. The 32 GB and 64 GB configurations in black are MC706LL/A and MC707LL/A, respectively. The 16 GB, 32 GB and 64 GB configurations in white are MD328LL/A, MD329LL/A, and MD330LL/A, respectively.
Apple iPad 3rd Gen (Wi-Fi/4G LTE AT&T/GPS) 16, 32, 64 GB
The Wi-Fi/4G LTE AT&T/GPS iPad 3 configurations are assigned model number A1430
MD366LL/A refers to the 16 GB configuration in black. The 32 GB and 64 GB configurations in black are MD367LL/A and MD368LL/A, respectively. The 16 GB, 32 GB and 64 GB configurations in white are MD369LL/A, MD370LL/A and MD371LL/A, respectively
Apple iPad 3rd Gen (Wi-Fi/4G LTE Verizon/GPS) 16, 32, 64 GB
The Wi-Fi/4G LTE Verizon/GPS iPad 3 configurations are assigned model number A1403
MC733LL/A refers to the 16 GB configuration in black. The 32 GB and 64 GB configurations in black are MC744LL/A and MC756LL/A, respectively. The 16 GB, 32 GB and 64 GB configurations in white are MD363LL/A, MD364LL/A, and MD365LL/A, respectively.
 Cheers, Tom

Difference between the binding and the value attribute of an Oracle ADF com

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for