Difference between transparent and replicated partitions

whats the difference between transparent and replicated partitions in EAL. currently we have created essbase cube via transparent partition in eal. performance of obiee reports on essbase cube is very bad. now somebody suggested to create essbase cube via replicated partition in EAL. what difference would it make. one guy said replicated partition would make it more slow. i am confused. please explain.

Transparent Partition does not occupy or create extra memory Space in the Destination Application , it just shows the Data from Source to the Destination cube . This partition is completely dependent on Existence of Source Data . While , in replicated Partition you can use a copy of source data in the Destination cube.
FYI : Hyperion Essbase 11.1.1.0 &#8211; Partitioning and its use cases &#8211; Transparent, Replicated and Linked part…

Similar Messages

Performance tips on transparent and replicated partitions?

I am quite new to this partitioning scene. Does anybody has tips on how to improve the performance and create the most feasible tranparent and replicated partitions? Thanks.

Our design is triangle shaped structure. There is a main application getting fed from two sub applications and these two sub applications are connected also by a transparent partition. One of the sub applications is the same as the main application. Same number of dimensions with the same dimensions. The second sub application is a smaller subset of the main application with less dimensions. All the transparent partitions defined as "(@IDESCENDENTS("Managerial Statement of Operations") @IDESCENDENTS("Income Statement Ratios") @IDESCENDENTS("Operating Ratios") @IDESCENDENTS("Statistics")@IDESCENDENTS("System Administration")) @IDESCENDENTS("Time") @IDESCENDENTS("Income Statement Type") @IDESCENDENTS("Funding Type") @IDESCENDENTS("Network Indicator") @IDESCENDENTS("Product") @IDESCENDENTS("Market Segment") @IDESCENDENTS("State") @IDESCENDENTS("Scenario") @IDESCENDENTS("Trading Partner") @IDESCENDENTS("Organization")" at the source and "(@IDESCENDENTS("Managerial Statement of Operations") @IDESCENDENTS("Income Statement Ratios") @IDESCENDENTS("Operating Ratios") @IDESCENDENTS("Statistics")@DESCENDENTS("System Admin - PL")) @IDESCENDENTS("Time") @IDESCENDENTS("Income Statement Type") @IDESCENDENTS("Funding Type") @IDESCENDENTS("Network Indicator") @IDESCENDENTS("Product") @IDESCENDENTS("Market Segment") @IDESCENDENTS("State") @IDESCENDENTS("Scenario") @IDESCENDENTS("Trading Partner") @IDESCENDENTS("Organization")" at the target. The dimensions are "Account", "Time", "Scenario", "Market Segment", "Income Statement Type", "Funding Type", "Product", "State", "Organization", "Trading Partner", and "Network Indicator". Thanks.

What is the differences between Transparent,Pooled and Cluster tables?

Hello all,
What is Pool table?What is the differences between Transparent,Pooled and Cluster tables?
Regards!
Purna

Transparent table:
Tables can be defined independently of the database in the ABAP Dictionary. The fields of the table are defined together with their (database-independent) data types and lengths.
A table definition in the ABAP Dictionary has the following components:
Table fields: The field names and the data types of the fields contained in the table are defined here.
Foreign keys: The foreign keys define the relationships between this table and other tables.
Technical settings: The technical settings define how the table is created on the database.
Indexes: Indexes can be defined for the table to speed up data selection from the table.
There are three categories of database tables in the ABAP Dictionary.
A physical table definition is created in the database for the table definition stored in the ABAP Dictionary for transparent tables when the table is activated. The table definition is translated from the ABAP Dictionary to a definition of the particular database.
On the other hand, pooled tables and cluster tables are not created in the database. The data of these tables is stored in the corresponding table pool or table cluster. It is not necessary to create indexes and technical settings for pooled and cluster tables.
Pooled table
Pooled tables can be used to store control data (e.g. screen sequences, program parameters or temporary data). Several pooled tables can be combined to form a table pool. The table pool corresponds to a physical table on the database in which all the records of the allocated pooled tables are stored.
Cluster table
Cluster tables contain continuous text, for example, documentation. Several cluster tables can be combined to form a table cluster. Several logical lines of different tables are combined to form a physical record in this table type. This permits object-by-object storage or object-by-object access. In order to combine tables in clusters, at least parts of the keys must agree. Several cluster tables are stored in one corresponding table on the database.
Regds,
Manohar

What is the difference between ODS and PSA?

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ODS AND PSA?

hi..
ODS:
Stores consolidated data on the document level.
Data is stored in transparent tables.
Reporting is possible.
Represented on the database by three transparent tables.
Stores Transaction data.
Can merge data from different infosources.
Can be defined as a datasource for another Bw system.
ODS has granular data, it is volaital.
ODS having the Over write functionality
contains Current data
PSA:
It is source system dependent.
Stores data in 2-D format.
We can edit data in PSA.
Reporting is not possible.
used mainly for performing manual update or simulate update or reconstruction.
partition is possible.
Data stored in psa can be used for several purposes.
Repeated delta updates possible.
Error handling posibility.
Structure of PSA is called as Trasfer structure.
It stores the data exactly like how the data is presented in the source system.
We have psa and ODS but we can't do reporting on PSA
You can do reporting in ODS , In PSA u cant do reportin directly
ODS contains detail -level data , PSA The requested data is saved, unchanged from the source system. Request data is stored in the transfer structure format in transparent, relational database tables in the Business Information Warehouse. The data format remains unchanged, meaning that no summarization or transformations take place
In ODS u have 3 tables Active, New data table, change log, In PSA u dont have
We can only add in PSA and change, add and delete in ODS.Is the statement true?
we can edit/add the records in PSA and delete the records,
i thjink its not possible to edit the records in ODS, u can delete the records, and u can add records in ODS
check out this link..
PSA and ODS
hope it helps..

What is the difference between OEE and OSE

What is the difference b/w
Oracle8i Enterprise Edition and Oracle8i Standard Edition?
Which version I choose to install the Oracle Server?

The real difference between one and the another one are the options installed in the database. I have a document where you can see in detail what options have one and what options have the another one.
Which version I choose to install the Oracle Server?
r.- That is quite related to what options you need for your applications. Options like : partitioning, etc.
With this view you can see what options are available in your database.
SQL> select * from v$option;
PARAMETER VALUE
Partitioning TRUE
Objects TRUE
Real Application Clusters FALSE
Advanced replication TRUE
Bit-mapped indexes TRUE
Connection multiplexing TRUE
Connection pooling TRUE
Database queuing TRUE
Incremental backup and recover TRUE
y
PARAMETER VALUE
Instead-of triggers TRUE
Parallel backup and recovery TRUE
Parallel execution TRUE
Parallel load TRUE
Point-in-time tablespace recov TRUE
ery
Fine-grained access control TRUE
Proxy authentication/authoriza TRUE
tion
PARAMETER VALUE
Change Data Capture TRUE
Plan Stability TRUE
Online Index Build TRUE
Coalesce Index TRUE
Managed Standby TRUE
Materialized view rewrite TRUE
Materialized view warehouse re TRUE
fresh
Database resource manager TRUE
Spatial TRUE
PARAMETER VALUE
Visual Information Retrieval TRUE
Export transportable tablespac TRUE
es
Transparent Application Failov TRUE
er
Fast-Start Fault Recovery TRUE
Sample Scan TRUE
Duplexed backups TRUE
Java TRUE
PARAMETER VALUE
OLAP Window Functions TRUE
Block Media Recovery TRUE
Fine-grained Auditing TRUE
Application Role TRUE
Enterprise User Security TRUE
Oracle Data Guard TRUE
Oracle Label Security FALSE
OLAP TRUE
Heap segment compression TRUE
Join index TRUE
Trial Recovery TRUE
PARAMETER VALUE
Oracle Data Mining TRUE
Online Redefinition TRUE
Streams TRUE
Very Large Memory TRUE
File Mapping TRUE
48 rows selected.
SQL>
Joel P�rez

What is the difference between, DSO and DTP in BI 7.0

Hi Guru's
what is the difference between, DSO and DTP in BI 7.0 , how it will come the data from r/3 to BI 7.0, can u discribe?
points will be assined?
Thanks & Regards,
Reddy.

Hi,
The data will be replicated in the same way as we do in 3.5.
Activating, and Transporting the same DS in BW, and Replicating them in BW from R/3.
First you need to know Diff b/w 3.5 nd 7.0, for that check the below doc's:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/a4/1be541f321c717e10000000a155106/content.htm
blogs:
/people/sap.user72/blog/2004/11/01/sap-bi-versus-sap-bw-what146s-in-a-name
Re: How to identify Header, Item and Schedule item level data sources?
For Transformations in BI:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/33/045741c0c28447e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/f8/7913426e48db2ce10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/a9/497f42d540d665e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
For DTP:
DTP:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/20/a894ed07e75648ba5cf7c876430589/frameset.htm
For DSO:
Data Store Objects:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/f9/45503c242b4a67e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Reg
Pra

Difference Between Transport and message protocols in XI

Hi,
Can u please explain with some example , Difference Between Transport and message protocols in XI.
thanks
dhanush

Hi dhanush,
This two can have different attributes which were assigned in the adapter metadata. Please see this help for some info on this:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/79/e462405c910272e10000000a155106/content.htm
Go to SAP BASIS 6.40 or 7.00 software compoenent and open namespace http://sap.com/xi/XI/System. Go to Adapter objects and open Adapter metadata. Then open any adapter. Here you can see all the properties of your adapter which support.
Transport protocol gives information about outside of message details, kind of system, security details.
A transport protocol is a network protocol that has the capability of transferring some payload from one node to another, thus providing some level of transparency from the underlying network.
Transport protocols are used as a mechanism to move payloads around a network. Typically, a payload will have a transport binding associated with it. For example, SOAP (acting as a payload) has a predetermined binding for HTTP (a transport protocol).
Some common transport protocols include: HTTP, HTTP-R, SMTP and BEEP.
Message protocol gives you an idea of message type XI payload
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/b6/0b733cb7d61952e10000000a11405a/content.htm
Regards
Biplab
<b><i>
note:reward with points if helpful</i></b>

How to tune the query and difference between CBO AND RBO.. Which is good

Hello Friends,
Here are some questions I have pls reply back with complete description and url if any ..
1)How Did you tune Query,
2)What approach you take to tune query? Do you use Hints?
3)Where did you tune the query and what are the issue with query?
4)What is difference between RBO and CBO? where u use RBO and CBO.
5)Give some information about hash join?
6) Using explain plan how do u know where the bottle neck in query .. how u will identify where the bottle neck is from explain plan .
thanks/Kumar

Hi,
kumar73 wrote:
Hello Friends,
Here are some questions I have pls reply back with complete description and url if any ..
1)How Did you tune Query, Use EXPLAIN PLAN to see exactly where it is spending its time, and address those areas.
See the forum FAQ
SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
"3. How to improve the performance of my query?"
2)What approach you take to tune query? Do you use Hints?Hints can help.
Even more helpful is writing the SQL efficiently (avoiding multiple scans of the same table, filtering early, using built-in rather than user-defined functions, ...), creating and using indexes, and, for large tables, partitioning.
Table design can have a big impact on performace.
Look for ways to do part of what you need before the query. This includes denormalizing (when appropriate), the kind of pre-digesting that often takes place in data warehouses, function-based indexes, and, starting in Oracle 11, virtual columns.
3)Where did you tune the query and what are the issue with query?Either this question is a vague summary of the entire thread, or I don't understand it. Can you re-phrase this part?
4)What is difference between RBO and CBO? where u use RBO and CBO.Basically, use RBO if you have Oracle 7 or earlier.

What is the difference between DSo and Infocube

Hello,
Kindly tell me what is the difference between DSO and Infocube?
And please tell me how to take the desicion that in whichi case we can use DSO and in which case we can use Infocube..

Hi ,
DataStore object serves as a storage location for consolidated and cleansed transaction data or master data on a document (atomic) level.
This data can be evaluated using a BEx query.
A DataStore object contains key fields (for example, document number/item) and data fields that can also contain character fields (for example, order status, customer) as key figures. The data from a DataStore object can be updated with a delta update into InfoCubes and/or other DataStore objects or master data tables (attributes or texts) in the same system or across different systems.
Unlike multidimensional data storage using InfoCubes, the data in DataStore objects is stored in transparent, flat database tables. The system does not create fact tables or dimension tables.
Use
The cumulative update of key figures is supported for DataStore objects, just as it is with InfoCubes, but with DataStore objects it is also possible to overwrite data fields. This is particularly important with document-related structures. If documents are changed in the source system, these changes include both numeric fields, such as the order quantity, and non-numeric fields, such as the ship-to party, status and delivery date. To reproduce these changes in the DataStore objects in the BI system, you have to overwrite the relevant fields in the DataStore objects and set them to the current value. Furthermore, you can use an overwrite and the existing change log to render a source delta enabled. This means that the delta that is further updated to the InfoCubes, for example, is calculated from two successive after-images.
An InfoCube describes (from an analysis point of view) a self-contained dataset, for example, for a business-orientated area. You analyze this dataset in a BEx query.
An InfoCube is a set of relational tables arranged according to the star schema: A large fact table in the middle surrounded by several dimension tables.
Use
InfoCubes are filled with data from one or more InfoSources or other InfoProviders. They are available as InfoProviders for analysis and reporting purposes.
Structure
The data is stored physically in an InfoCube. It consists of a number of InfoObjects that are filled with data from staging. It has the structure of a star schema.
The real-time characteristic can be assigned to an InfoCube. Real-time InfoCubes are used differently to standard InfoCubes.
ODS versus Info-cubes in a typical project scenario
ODS
why we use ods?
why is psa & ods nessasary
Hope this helps,
Regards,
CSM Reddy

A CONFUSION:The difference between cluster and multi-IP--DNS mapping??

          I have a test about simplest cluster,admin and managed server all told me "start
          cluster service"!the two IP address use ONE DomainName,If one down,when I send
          request with dn,It first look up admin server,no found and then go dns to search
          another server,about one minute then the server send response to me!
          But when I do not config a cluster,only start two admin server and give them the
          same dns,the same appearance as cluster!
          I don't understand the difference between cluster and multi-IP--DNS mapping??


          <[email protected]> wrote in message news:3b16f1db$[email protected]..
          |
          | I have a test about simplest cluster,admin and managed server all told me
          "start
          | cluster service"!the two IP address use ONE DomainName,If one down,when I
          send
          | request with dn,It first look up admin server,no found and then go dns to
          search
          | another server,about one minute then the server send response to me!
          |
          This is DNS fail-over.
          | But when I do not config a cluster,only start two admin server and give
          them the
          | same dns,the same appearance as cluster!
          | I don't understand the difference between cluster and multi-IP--DNS
          mapping??
          It is totally different. regarding the last failover example you've given,
          of course the 2 servers can have identical files maintained under
          public_html. DNS will failover requests to "foo.html" to the other one if
          the first server is down, but if you have something saved in a session, say
          shopping cart example, it's totally lost, but with WLS clustering, the
          session is replicated to the other server in the cluster, you may just
          check-out, don't have to order again.
          This is just a simple example of WLS cluster session-replication. WLS
          supports EJB, RMI Objects, JMS (6.0) clustering.. check the doc at
          http://www.weblogic.com/docs50/cluster/index.html

Difference between Insert and Insert all

Hi,
I tried to understand what INSERT ALL syntax is doing, but I cannot find any difference between INSERT and INSERT ALL.
I replicated the test scenario using the data from the below mentioned URL:
http://psoug.org/reference/insert.html
I also did a google on finding up the difference between them, but could not find any...
Please advice if both are same as I have planned to use INSERT statement with a WHEN clause if INSERT ALL is same as INSERT.
Thanks!

Hello
The key difference is that INSERT ALL will allow you to insert into multiple different tables in a single statement whereas INSERT will only insert into 1 table. Each of the WHEN clauses allows a different table to be specified.
SQL> create table t1
2 (   id number
3 )
4 /
Table created.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
SQL> create table t2
2 (   id number
3 )
4 /
Table created.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
SQL> create table t3
2 (   id number
3 )
4 /
Table created.
SQL> INSERT
2 ALL
3      WHEN id < 10 THEN
4          INTO t1 VALUES(id)
5      WHEN MOD(id,2) = 0 THEN
6          INTO t2 VALUES(id)
7      WHEN MOD(id,2) != 0 THEN
8          INTO t3 VALUES(id)
9 SELECT
10      rownum id
11 FROM
12      dual
13 CONNECT BY
14      LEVEL <=20
15 /
29 rows created.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
SQL> select * from t1;
        ID
         1
         2
         3
         4
         5
         6
         7
         8
         9
9 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
SQL> select * from t2;
        ID
         2
         4
         6
         8
        10
        12
        14
        16
        18
        20
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
SQL> select * from t3
2 /
        ID
         1
         3
         5
         7
         9
        11
        13
        15
        17
        19
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01So you can see that in a single statement, I've inserted all rows with an ID <10 into t1, all even numbered rows into t2 and all odd numbered rows into t3. This was also done with a single pass of the source table - in this case dual.
David

Difference between is_published and is_replicated columns of sys.tables

Hello,
Can someone please tell me the exact difference between is_published and is_replicated columns of sys.tables? I know is_published is inherited from sys.objects table , but purpose of both the columns are same. However sometimes for some replicated tables
i have seen is_published = 1 and is_replicated = 0 and for another published database tables value of both columns are 1.
It is bit confusing. Can you please explain?
Thanks in Advance.
-Malkesh

Is published has a value of 1 for snapshot and transactional replication, and peer to peer.
Is_replicated has a value of 1 for transactional, p2p, and cdc.
The values will be 1 for both the pub and the subscriber in p2p, but are 0 for both for all other subscription types.
The values are always 0 for merge.
looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Administration?
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Server-2008-Management-Administration/dp/067233044X looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Full-Text Search?
http://www.amazon.com/Pro-Full-Text-Search-Server-2008/dp/1430215941

Difference between LIS and Lo extraction

Hi,
Wat is the Difference between LIS and LO extraction.
Thanks,
Sanu

HI
One good difference between lis and los is
lis uses transparent tables where as los use cluster tables
ust some infos about LIS flows....
with Plug-In 2001.2 S2xx-Structures have been replaced by Logistics Extraction Cockpit. However, R/3 releases 4.x support S2xx-Structures and Logistics Extraction Cockpit in parallel.
With new LBWE extractors there are a lot of benefits:
- Detailed Extraction: extraction can be deactivated (e.g. Schedule Line Data) leads to leaner extractors with less volume.
- Document Changes: only BW-relevant data changes will be updated (less upload volume).
- LIS-Tables are not updated reduced data volume due to avoided redundancy.
- Update with Batch-Process (V3) -> no load on daily business (but now there are available different delta methods as the direct delta...)
- No LIS-Know How necessary.
- Functional Enhancements easy to be done.
- Central, uniform maintenance tool for logistics applications (LBWE)
- No Delta-Tables (SnnnBIW1/-2) no double update, no double Data-Storage
- A lot of flows are covered: Purchasing,Inventory Controlling, Shop Floor Control, Quality Management, Shipment, Sales, Shipping, Billing, Plant Maintenance, Customer Service,
hope this helps

Difference between Table and Table Type

Hi
Can you please let me know the
Difference between Table and Table Type and
Difference between Structure and Table Type?
Regards,
Sree

hi,
table is a data dictionary object in sap. table is of different types
1. transparent tables
2. pool tables
3. cluster tables
table type gives option for u to select different types of internal tables. they r
1. standard table
2. sorted table
3. hash table
Structures :
-Defined like a table and can then be addressed from ABAP programs.
-Structures contain data only during the runtime of a program.
-Just like user-defined data type.
- they are not present in database server and only on application server.
if helpful reward some points.
with regards,
Suresh Aluri.

Difference between asm and san

Dear all Guru's,
I have a question what is difference between san and asm because san also provide mirroring like asm,why we shuld go for asm.
Regards,
Jam

926840 wrote:
but i want to know if i don't use asm or use asm storage layer for oracle dbf file?.what is the benefit of using asm storage because some of organization don't use asm storage.There are two basic types of storage for Oracle databases.
"Cooked" file system. This means the disk is formatted and managed via a specific file system driver. On Windows, that would be ntfs. On Linux, that typically would be something like ext3.
This file system is managed by the file system driver loaded into the kernel. It does directory and file management, service I/O calls to read and write files, provides caching, and so on.
ASM does not support cooked file system as it already has a driver that manages that formatted file system drive/partition.
Raw disks is the second storage type. This means it is unformatted - and as such, you cannot (via standard o/s commands) use the drive to create/update/delete/etc directories and files.
ASM supports managing such raw (non-cooked) devices. As these devices are directly used by the database, the database can better control and managed device access.
Simple example. The database writes 10 8KB database blocks to a cooked file system. It has no idea whether those 10 blocks were actually written to disk.. or whether the file system driver has cached that write and all 10 blocks still sit in memory. The database itself also has a cache. So there are now 2 memory caches.. a physical database I/O may actually be a logical file system I/O.. These factors make managing and determining performance complex.
A raw non-cooked device does not have such a secondary cooked file system cache. If the database does a physical write to disk, the data is actually written to disk. There is a single memory cache that is managed by the database. Less complexity and less ambiguity. And it can also mean better performance.
Manually managing raw device is however complex. And in the past, problematic as the database directly used the raw device without providing any type of management layer for raw devices. ASM addresses that issue - and addresses it very well.
Using SAN LUNs as cooked file systems for an Oracle database does not make much sense IMO. SAN LUNs should be used as raw devices for the database - and ASM used as management layer for these devices.

Difference between transparent and replicated partitions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for