Difference of nslookup printout on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10

Hi,
I am not sure whether I had to post in Solaris 9 or Solaris 10 forum. So I posted this here too.
We are porting some of our applications from Solaris 9 to Solaris 10. We found a
strange problem/ scenario with the nslookup on Solaris 9.
We issued a ENUM query on Solaris 9 and the output from the nslookup binary on
Solaris 9 is given below :
nslookup -q=naptr -timeout=0 -domainname=. 0.0.2.1.6.2.2.7.2.1.0.e164i.arpa
Server: test.org
Address: xx.xx.xx.xx
0.0.2.1.6.2.2.7.2.1.0.e164i.arpa order = 0, preference = 0
flags = "u"
services = "E2U+sip"
rule = "!^.*$!sip:01272261200;phone-context=[email protected];user=phone!"
replacement = (root)
0.0.2.1.6.2.2.7.2.1.0.e164i.arpa order = 1, preference = 0
flags = "u"
services = "E2U+sip"
rule = "!^.*$!sip:01272261200;phone-context=[email protected];user=phone!"
replacement = (root)
The same query on Solaris 10 has the following output :
nslookup -q=naptr -timeout=0 -domain=. 0.0.2.1.6.2.2.7.2.1.0.e164i.arpa
Server: xx.xx.xx.xx
Address: xx.xx.xx.x#53
0.0.2.1.6.2.2.7.2.1.0.e164i.arpa naptr = 0 0 "u" "E2U+sip" "!^.*$!sip:01272261200\;phone-context=[email protected]\;user=phone!" .
0.0.2.1.6.2.2.7.2.1.0.e164i.arpa naptr = 1 0 "u" "E2U+sip" "!^.*$!sip:01272261200\;phone-context=[email protected]\;user=phone!" .
I was wondering why the backslash is present only on Solaris 10 and not in Solaris 9. Is this a error in Solaris 9 or is the prinout format in Solaris
10 wrong ???
Thanks in advance !!
Regards,
Philip

We encoutered a problem on the solaris 10 machine do to a applicative bug. At a moment we get the url xxxxx.do?method=toto&method=titi.Havent you used the same parameter name ??
method=toto&method=titi
Looks same to me ;-)
So I envision this as a coding bug than a Solaris bug.
Or ...maybe you can throw some more light if I misunderstood you.
-Rohit

Similar Messages

SSH Differences between Solaris 9 and Solaris 10

I use public key authentication when connecting via SSH but have noticed a difference between Solaris 9 and Solaris 10 and wondered if it's an environment setup issue. I keep my keys in $HOME/.ssh
When connecting from Solaris 9 I can provide an identity file without a path regardless of the directory that I'm in e.g.
ssh -i my_identity_file user@hostnameThe above works even if I'm not in the $HOME/.ssh directory. But when using the same from Solaris 10 I get the following error:
Warning: Identity file my_identity_file does not exist.If I run the command from $HOME/.ssh on Solaris 10 it connects fine, and if I pass in the path like so it works fine:
ssh -i $HOME/.ssh/my_identity_file user@hostnameIs there a setting specific to SSH somewhere as I can't see anything in my environment that's different between the two systems. There's certainly no entry in $PATH that points to $HOME/.ssh. How could I get SSH to work on Solaris 10 by just providing the identity file name and not the full path
Regards
Rich

It's not explicitly defined in /etc/ssh/ssh_config, so I'm assuming it would be using the default which is ~/.ssh/id_dsa.
But surely that's irrelevant if I'm using the -i switch to provide the identity file?
Remember the problem here is that I have to provide a full path to the identity file, whereas before just the filename would do.
Rich

Solaris and Windows (differences between the two OS for development)

Hi All,
From the moment that I learned Java, I have always been using Windows to do all of my implementation. Very soon, I will be moving to Solaris and I was just wondering whether anyone out here could share the things that I should take notice for developing under Solaris which in the past (in XP/NT/2000) would not be something that I have to deal with.
Also, to speed things up, would it be helpful if I start experimenting Java under Linux?? or Developing under Linux is also different than Solaris. I might get comfortable playing with the commands (as it's been 10 years since I last worked on Unix)
But really, I am more concerned about all the problems that I will have to face, I would appreciate if anyone could share their experience with me.
Thx.

The Java language is platform independent.
You might find a few thread syncing issues on a true multitasking multiprocessor Solaris box which windows timeslicing won't reveal, and there's the unix file system has a few more tricks, like being able to read and write a file simultaniously, but that's about it (from memory).
The only practical difference developing on Solaris is the box won't crash behind the JVM.
Oh, and your ant scripts & properties files will need porting.
Good luck. Keith.

Why difference in Solaris and Linux

Hi,
The following program is giving results diferently when I am executing using g++ compiler in Solaris and Linux.
Why it is so.
here is the code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <malloc.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main( void )
size_t size;
char *buf;
if ( ( buf = (char *)malloc(10 *sizeof(char))) == NULL)
exit (1);
size = sizeof( buf );
strcpy(buf, "HelloWorld");
printf("\n Address is : %u String is : %s size : %d ", buf, buf,size);
if (( buf = (char *) realloc(buf, sizeof(20))) == NULL)
exit ( 1);
*(buf+10) = 'A'; *(buf+11) = 'B'; *(buf+12) = '\0';
printf("\n Address is : %u String is : %s\n", buf, buf);
free( buf);
exit( 0 );
Solaris:
Address is : 134160 String is : HelloWorld size : 4
Address is : 135704 String is : HelloWor
Linux:
Address is : 134518824 String is : HelloWorld size : 4
Address is : 134518824 String is : HelloWorldAB
Thanks
Venkat

Hi,
The following program is giving results diferently
when I am executing using g++ compiler in Solaris
and Linux.
Why it is so.
here is the code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <malloc.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main( void )
size_t size;
char *buf;
if ( ( buf = (char *)malloc(10 *sizeof(char))) == NULL)
exit (1);
size = sizeof( buf );The size you get here is the size of buf, which is the size of a pointer, not the size of what buf points to. sizeof(*buf) would give you size of a char, the type (not the object) that buf points to.
There is no portable way to find out the number of bytes allocated on the heap if you are give only a pointer to the memory. You have to remember the size some other way..
strcpy(buf, "HelloWorld");A literal string consists of the characters in the string plus a terminating null, all of which are copied by strcpy. You allocated 10 chars for buf, but are writing 11 chars into it. At this point, the program has undefined behavior. Literally anything at all could happen, because you can't predict the effect of writing outside the bounds of allocated memory.
printf("\n Address is : %u String is : %s size :
e : %d ", buf, buf,size);
if (( buf = (char *) realloc(buf, sizeof(20))) == NULL)The "sizeof" operator in this case is returning the size of the type of a literal 20, which is an int. If you want to allocate 20 bytes, you write 20, not sizeof(20).
exit ( 1);
*(buf+10) = 'A'; *(buf+11) = 'B'; *(buf+12) == '\0';SInce you can't count on buf having more than 4 bytes at this time, you are writing into unallocated memory, with undefined results.
printf("\n Address is : %u String is : %s\n", buf, buf);
free( buf);
exit( 0 );
Instead of asking why you get different results on different platforms, you should be asking why the program doesn't crash on all platforms. :-)
You can avoid these problems with keeping track of allocating memory by using the C++ standard library instead of trying to manage low-level details yourself as in C code.
The standard string class, for example, extends itself as needed, and ensures that heap memory is freed when the string object is deleted or goes out of scope. You don't need pointers, malloc, free, or sizeof to use C++ strings.

Differences between Linux and Solaris command set

Hi,
It is complicated to learn Solaris? Is the set of commands the same of Linux?
It is because is more simple for me to find a Linux Admin book than a Solaris book.
Thanks.
Lorenzo

BTW: You might want to start with this peace if information:
http://wwws.sun.com/software/whitepapers/linux/linux_overview.pdf
One remark: this Blue/white paper is written for audience known to Solaris and new to Linux, but usefull the other way around.
Specially table 1 is very usefull !
Good luck, and Welcome as new Solaris Administrator.
Eric.

Difference of request.getParameter on Solaris 8 and Solaris 10

Hi all,
We put our application running on Solaris 8 and BroadVision 6.0 patch AO (JDK 1.4.2) on a machine running Solaris 10.
We encoutered a problem on the solaris 10 machine do to a applicative bug. At a moment we get the url xxxxx.do?method=toto&method=titi.
Here is the part of the code which is executed differently on Solaris 8 and Solaris 10
String name = request.getParameter("method");
to get the value of "method"
In solaris 8; we have name="toto"
In solaris 10, we have name="titi"
Does anyone encoutered the same "bug" ????
Regards,
Fred

We encoutered a problem on the solaris 10 machine do to a applicative bug. At a moment we get the url xxxxx.do?method=toto&method=titi.Havent you used the same parameter name ??
method=toto&method=titi
Looks same to me ;-)
So I envision this as a coding bug than a Solaris bug.
Or ...maybe you can throw some more light if I misunderstood you.
-Rohit

Difference Between Solaris 9/04 and Solaris 9/05

Hi,
I would like to know whats all fixes and new features have been released in Sol 9 9/05 compared to Sol 9 9/04. Can anyone suggest? While doing upgrade i got the follow error.
q Warning qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
The Solaris Version (Solaris 9) on slice d0 (c1t0d0s0 c1t1d0s0)
cannot be upgraded.
A file system listed in the file system table (vfstab) could not
be checked by fsck.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
q Warning qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
There are no other upgradeable versions of Solaris on this
system. You can choose to do an initial installation, or you can
exit and fix any errors that are preventing you from upgrading.
WARNING: If you choose Initial, you'll be presented with screens
to do an initial installation, which will overwrite your file
systems with the new version of Solaris. Backing up any
modifications that you've made to the previous version of
Solaris is recommended before starting the initial option. The
initial option also lets you preserve existing file systems.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
Esc-2_Initial Esc-5_Exit

I'm having similar problem. I've gone from this:
#device device mount FS fsck mount mount
#to mount to fsck point type pass at boot options
fd - /dev/fd fd - no -
/proc - /proc proc - no -
#/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s1 - - swap - no -
/dev/md/dsk/d0 - - swap - no -
/dev/md/dsk/d10 /dev/md/rdsk/d10 / ufs 1 no -
/dev/md/dsk/d20 /dev/md/rdsk/d20 /var ufs 1 no -
/dev/dsk/emcpower1g /dev/rdsk/emcpower1a /db01 ufs 2 yes
/dev/md/dsk/d30 /dev/md/rdsk/d30 /export/home ufs 2 yes
/dev/dsk/emcpower0g /dev/rdsk/emcpower0a /backup ufs 2 yes
/dev/dsk/emcpower2g /dev/rdsk/emcpower2a /disk01 ufs 2 yes
/dev/md/dsk/d50 /dev/md/rdsk/d50 /disk02 ufs 2 yes -
/dev/md/dsk/d40 /dev/md/rdsk/d40 /install ufs 2 yes
swap - /tmp tmpfs - yes -
to this:
#device device mount FS fsck mount mount
#to mount to fsck point type pass at boot options
fd - /dev/fd fd - no -
/proc - /proc proc - no -
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s1 - - swap - no -
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0 / ufs 1 no -
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s3 /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s3 /var ufs 1 no -
swap - /tmp tmpfs - yes -
and I still get the error. Using Sol10 5/09 DVD

Differences between Soalris and Solaris Express /Developer Edition

Hi
Thank you for readingn my post
What is different between Solaris Express (Developer Edition) and solaris OS?
Are they the same and with same capabilities?
Can I install S1 Grid suite in a Express edition?
Thanks

Solaris 10 (with several updates) is the current release version of the Solaris operating system.
Since the release in '05, Sun has been developing the "next" version of Solaris. Using the OpenSolaris code as a base, this version is codenamed "Nevada". Periodic builds of this version are available as Solaris Express. So you get more up-to-date drivers, features, and bugs from it. Because it's under development, there are no patches. Instead you'd need to upgrade to the next release (or create your own patch).
I haven't looked specifically at S1 Grid, so it very likely will install. However installations on Solaris Express may not be a supported configuration if you need that.
Darren

Function-Based Indexes (FBI) on Linux and Solaris

I have a question about FBI on different systems (Linux and Solaris).
---- Oracle on Linux -----
SQL> CREATE TABLE T_DUMMY(NAME VARCHAR(20));
Table created.
SQL> CREATE INDEX T_DUMMY_IDX ON T_DUMMY(UPPER(NAME));
Index created.
However, when I do the same on the Oracle running on Solaris, I get the following error:
---- Oracle on Solaris -----
SQL> CREATE TABLE T_DUMMY(NAME VARCHAR(20));
Table created.
SQL> CREATE INDEX T_DUMMY_IDX ON T_DUMMY(UPPER(NAME));
CREATE INDEX T_DUMMY_IDX ON T_DUMMY(UPPER(NAME))
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
I know that I have to add "QUERY REWRITE" in order to create a FBI. However, why Oracle on Linux behave differently. Would it be any difference/problem if I do NOT add "QUERY REWRITE" for Oracle on Linux (For example, would the EXPLAIN PLAN different)?

general user settings are the same (privilege, role) Well, the specific settings must be different. I would check to see whether one of the roles has been granted the QUERY REWRITE system privilege on your Linux instance but not on Solaris.
Cheers, APC

Defferent work usleep in Solaris 10 and Solaris 9

I've compile program in Solaris 9 and Solaris 10(cc or gcc).
On Solaris 9 cpu load is lower then 1 %.
On Solaris 10 cpu load is more then 16%.
Why I have this big difference. 16% is very big for me.

I presume you compiled php on the Sun server, was this done using gcc or the Sun One C compiler.
If the latter then you can also use the flag: --enable-nonportable-atomics when you run configure

CATIA V5 and Solaris, how to do it???

Hi people,
I have a question that I cant seem to find clear and good answer, what system am I suppose to install V5 catia on, where can I download that particular version of solaris, and can that operating system run on the AMD processor or is there any difference between Intel/AMD processors for Solaris.
Please if anybody has any knowledge on this metter.
With Best Regards.
Marko

Hi Marko,
This isn't gonna work I'm afraid: Dassault offers two binaries for Catia, Solaris SPARC and x86 Windows... In other words, the x86 version of Catia isn't going to be compatible with Solaris x86 as it's an MS Windows code...
Now a little note of hope: PTC has released a version of Pro/E for Solaris x86, so if Dassault sees a market for this they will follow... All it takes is a big customer commited to Solaris x86 interested in Catia...

Resource Management and Solaris Zones Developer Guide

Solaris Information Products ("Pubs") is creating a
developer guide for resource management and Solaris Zones.
The department is seeking input on content from application
developers and ISVs.
We plan to discuss the different categories of applications
that can take advantage of Solaris resource management
features, and provide implementation examples that discuss
the particular RM features that can be used.
Although running in a zone poses no differences to most
applications, we will describe any possible limitations and
offer appropriate workarounds. We will also provide
information needed by the ISV, such as determining
the appropriate system calls to use in a non-global zone.
We plan to use case studies to document the zones material.
We would like to know the sorts of topics that you would
like to see covered. We want to be sure that we address
your specific development concerns with regard to these
features.
Thank you for your comments and suggestions.

Hi there, i'm using solaris resource management in a
server with more thant 2thousand acounts.
Created profiles for users, defaul, staff, root and
services.Seeing the contents of your /etc/project file could be helpful.
But while using rctladm to enable syslog'ing, I set up
global flags of "deny" and "no-local-action" in almos
everything.The flags on the right hand side of the rctladm(1M) output are read-only:
they are telling you the characteristics of the resource control in question (what
operations the system will allow the resource control to take).
Now, many aplications don't work because they are
denied enough process.max-stack-size and
process.max-file-descriptor for them to work.
Applications such has prstat.If prstat(1) is failing due to the process.max-file-descriptor control value, that's
probably a bug. prstat(1) is more likely bumping into the limit to assess how many file
descriptors are available, and then carrying on--you're just seeing a log message since
prstat(1) tested the file descriptor limit, and you've enabled syslog for that control. Please
post the prstat(1) output, and we'll figure out if something's breaking.
I don't find a way to disable the global flags. You can't. I would disable the syslog action on the process.max-stack-size control first;
there is an outstanding bug on this control, in that it will report a false triggering event--
no actual effect to the process. (If you send me some mail, I will add you as a call record
on the bug.)
Can anyone tell me:
how to disable global flags?
how to disable and enable solaris resource management
all together?You could raise all of the control values, but the resource control facility (like the resource
limit facility it superseded) is always active. Let's figure out if you're hitting the bug I mentioned,
and then figure out how to proceed.
- Stephen
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[email protected]

Heterogeneous clustering with WinNT and Solaris machines.

          Hi All,
          I've deployed my applications on two WinNT machines which are running in cluster with iWS41. as proxy
          server. The shared directory for this clustering is residing on one of these NT machine. I want to put one more
          Solaris machine in this clustering. Can anybody suggest me, how the new Solaris machine will access that
          shared directory residing on another WinNT machine in LAN, I'm new to Solaris, I also want to know that will
          there be any issues regarding this heterogeneous environment for clustering.
          Regards,
          Jitendra Kumar.


          Hi,
          If m/c on which shared directoy is, goes
          down, all WLS running in cluster will report the problem.
          Further WLS may stop unless and untill shared directory is
          available again.
          Mind it, all WLS should be of same version and same SP on all
          for running in cluster perfectly and also same EJBs version
          on all m/c if u go for same EJBs copies on all m/c and not using
          shared directory.
          Regards,
          Jitendra.
          "Bernhard Lenz" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >I'm a bit confused...
          >
          >Both Rock and you are recommending not to copy the deployed files to a
          >shared directory because of the single point of failure. My concern is that
          >our admins won't be able to handle multiple copies of the same files and
          >debugging a cluster where nodes behave differently because of versioning
          >issues might be very difficult. Please help me to clarify the following
          >question. Let's say the shared directory is on a separate machine that does
          >not have a WL node running on it. All nodes within the WL cluster boot up
          >fine and load their files and beans from the shared directory. Now the file
          >server with the shared directory goes down. Does it affect the running node
          >instances of the cluster? Do they access e.g. the deployed beans during
          >runtime or do they only load them upon startup? If last is true a crashed
          >shared directory would have no effect on a running cluster.
          >
          >Please help to clarify.
          >
          >Thanks
          >Bernie
          >
          >
          >"Prasad Peddada" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          >news:[email protected]...
          >> There is absolutely no necessity to use shared file system to start
          >servers in a cluster.
          >>
          >> All you have to do is start the servers in a cluster mode and use the same
          >multicast address. Make sure you have identical settings
          >> on both servers as far as application deployment is concerned.
          >>
          >> Other than that there is no dependencies.
          >>
          >> - Prasad
          >>
          >> Jitendra Kumar wrote:
          >>
          >> > Hi Rock,
          >> >
          >> > There r two properties :
          >> > -weblogic.system.home
          >> > -weblogic.home
          >> > second one is the local home where a server will look for myserver
          >directory.
          >> > First one is the one where all servers who want to join will look for
          >mycluster directory.
          >> >
          >> > my concern is that in case of NT boxes first properties is that
          >destination of u'r shared directory, so to specify
          >> > that shared directory on Solaris what to give as on NT it is being given
          >as :
          >> > "\\<computername>\<shared directory name>"
          >> > Please tell me about that 'SAMBA', from where to get that software and
          >how to install that one.
          >> >
          >> > Regrads,
          >> > Jitendra Kumar.
          >> >
          >> > "Rock" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >> > >
          >> > >Kumar,
          >> > >The system home is the base directory which houses your
          >server...regardless
          >> > >of what u wish to call it. For example, myserver. The system name is
          >the
          >> > >actual name of your server .. ie. myserver.
          >> > >
          >> > >Thus,
          >> > >home = c:\myhome
          >> > >name = myserver
          >> > >
          >> > >This does not mean that each system has to view exactly what is within
          >the directory on the
          >> > >other physical machine necessarily. Each of your instances (on other
          >machines of the same machine)
          >> > >can have individual characteristics.
          >> > >
          >> > >Now, if u are in a clustered environment...u will house yet another
          >directory under the home dir...which
          >> > >u obviously already know about. Then the individual servers will
          >reside under that dir...like
          >> > >myserver1 and myserver 2...they must be unique.
          >> > >
          >> > >The properties up until the individual servers should be the same.
          >Thus, u should not have a
          >> > >problem. Communication between the instances simply are broadcasted on
          >your multicast
          >> > >address. You can specify any differences at the individual server
          >level.
          >> > >
          >> > >So, Im not sure where your concern is based. Again, I have not tried
          >this before.
          >> > >Just try it and let me know what happens...we'll go from there.
          >> > >Im curious.
          >> > >
          >> > >I have other concerns about mixing your systems in a production
          >env...but lets look
          >> > >at this scenario first.
          >> > >
          >> > >"Jitendra Kumar" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >> > >>
          >> > >>Hi Rock,
          >> > >>
          >> > >>U r right, i'm just testing but finally it has to go in production
          >env.
          >> > >>My Solaris machine is in same LAN so multicast communication will not
          >be a problem as of now it's working
          >> > >>fine with NT boxes. But the problem is when u start individual servers
          >in cluster u specify
          >> > >>-Dweblogic.system.home=<shared directory address> and from this shared
          >directory picks up properties files
          >> > >>or verifies JSP or other files during runtime with local files having
          >in directory '\myserver'.
          >> > >>As u suggested the same env on solaris box, that's already in place
          >but the thing is that locating a common
          >> > >>shared directory from Solaris machine for properties file.
          >> > >>As documentation is suggesting for this :
          >> > >>
          >> > >>*****************
          >> > >>A RAID system in which files are striped across multiple disks and
          >parity information is stored so that the
          >> > >> contents of any failed disk can be reconstructed from the
          >remaining disks
          >> > >> Off-the-shelf file servers can provide fault tolerance
          >out-of-the-box, with operating systems such as Solaris and
          >> > >> Windows NT providing the software support. Consult with
          >your hardware supplier for further information on
          >> > >> installing and running such a system
          >> > >>********************
          >> > >>
          >> > >>Can anybody give me some informations regarding set up of the above
          >kind of shared file system.
          >> > >>
          >> > >>Regards,
          >> > >>Jitendra Kumar.
          >> > >
          >>
          >> --
          >> Cheers
          >>
          >> - Prasad
          >>
          >>
          >
          >

Diff between Solaris 8 and Solaris 9

Hello Experts,
Do we have a document which talks about the diff between Solaris 8 and Solaris 9
I need to know what are the new featured in Solaris 9 and etc....
Thanks in Advance.
Sunil.

Sadly, the difference between the early releases of Solaris 9 and the late releases of Solaris 8 isn't that big, since Sun backported a lot of the cool features in Solaris 9 to Solaris 8..
Hence; the answer to your question depends on which Solaris 8 and which Solaris 9 releases you are talking about.
However, a complete list of changes incoperated in the different Solaris 9 releases can be found here:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-5770/6ml72d6k9?a=view
I guess there are similar lists for Solaris 10, which is even cooler than 8/9.
Enjoy!
//Magnus

Linux and solaris version

Hi all,
What version of linux and solaris support oracle 11g(weblogic) , what is the difference between older versions and higher versions?
Regards
Srinivas kola

Hi Francis,
You can find the certification information here:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/fusion-certification-100350.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/downloads/fmw-11gr1certmatrix.xls
Regards Peter

Difference of nslookup printout on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for