Differences in CIN management between Labview 5.0 and Labview 7.1 ?
Hi,
I'm using a VI on a two photon microscope. It steers the laser beam in the sample (quite the same way as a TV scan, scanning a fast line on the X axis, then moving the line down) controlling two mirrors by the PCI-MIO-16E-4 Multifunctions card on traditional DAQ and at the same time it serves as the acquitision through a non-NI DSP Multifunction-board with on-board buffers and hight data throughput (70 Mb/s).
It is this part of the program which gives us strong headaches since we have upgraded to a new PC.
On the old machine we used Win2k and Labview 5.0; on the new machine we planned to use WinXP Pro and Labview 7.1.
The acquisition part of the VI uses 2 CINs. One is used to configure the FPGA on the Multifunctions board at initialization.
The second CIN reads he buffers received from the board and puts them into the shape of an image.
Now since we tried in WinXP Pro and Labview 7.1, we get some kind of weird bugs. Either there is a big problem concerning the synchronization of the mirros with the acquisition or with the image reconstruction. We have already tried :
1. Putting everything back into the old machine to verify there has not been any damage to the boards. OK
2. Using the boards in the new machine but with Win2000 and Labiew 5.0, just to be sure that there are no conflicting elements in the hardware. OK
As we wanted to check everything slowly but surely we then installed LV 7.1 on the new machine but still with Win2k. And here the problem appears !
First we thought the drivers for the Multifunctions board (ATEME Adr128C6x) were not compatible with WinXP Pro, so at this point we were quite surprised to notice the problem seems to be caused by the upgrade from LV 5.0 to 7.1 !
Now, finally my question is : Are there any major changes in how Labview handles CINs between LV5.0 and 7.1 ?
Can the problem be caused by the
So, no answer,...
Anyhow, we found the problem on our own. For anyone else experiencing this kind of behaviour :
The problem did not have anything to do with our CINs, nor with XP.
In fact, we have noticed that the Analog Ground the Digital Ground had to be connected. For some kind of reason in LabView 5.0 this did not introduce the problem. But in Labview 7.1 the sync, because of a somewhat unstable Ground, it caused complete disfunctionment. We don't know why but, hey, the problem is gone.
Similar Messages
-
Differences in CIN management between Labview 5.0 and Labview 7.1 ?
Hi,
I'm using a VI on a two photon microscope. It steers the laser beam in the sample (quite the same way as a TV scan, scanning a fast line on the X axis, then moving the line down) controlling two mirrors by the PCI-MIO-16E-4 Multifunctions card on traditional DAQ and at the same time it serves as the acquitision through a non-NI DSP Multifunction-board with on-board buffers and hight data throughput (70 Mb/s).
It is this part of the program which gives us strong headaches since we have upgraded to a new PC.
On the old machine we used Win2k and Labview 5.0; on the new machine we planned to use WinXP Pro and Labview 7.1.
The acquisition part of the VI uses 2 CINs. One is used to configure the FPGA on the Multifunctions board at initialization.
The second CIN reads he buffers received from the board and puts them into the shape of an image.
Now since we tried in WinXP Pro and Labview 7.1, we get some kind of weird bugs. Either there is a big problem concerning the synchronization of the mirros with the acquisition or with the image reconstruction. We have already tried :
1. Putting everything back into the old machine to verify there has not been any damage to the boards. OK
2. Using the boards in the new machine but with Win2000 and Labiew 5.0, just to be sure that there are no conflicting elements in the hardware. OK
As we wanted to check everything slowly but surely we then installed LV 7.1 on the new machine but still with Win2k. And here the problem appears !
First we thought the drivers for the Multifunctions board (ATEME Adr128C6x) were not compatible with WinXP Pro, so at this point we were quite surprised to notice the problem seems to be caused by the upgrade from LV 5.0 to 7.1 !
Now, finally my question is : Are there any major changes in how Labview handles CINs between LV5.0 and 7.1 ?
Can the problem be caused by the traditional DAQSo, no answer,...
Anyhow, we found the problem on our own. For anyone else experiencing this kind of behaviour :
The problem did not have anything to do with our CINs, nor with XP.
In fact, we have noticed that the Analog Ground the Digital Ground had to be connected. For some kind of reason in LabView 5.0 this did not introduce the problem. But in Labview 7.1 the sync, because of a somewhat unstable Ground, it caused complete disfunctionment. We don't know why but, hey, the problem is gone. -
Difference with CD auto-mount between OL 5.7 and OEL 5.4
Hello,
I'm experiencing a difference when auto-mounting a CD between OL 5.7 and OEL 5.4 (x86_64).
Under OEL 5.4, a CD does not have "execute" privileges.
The mount command shows the following relevant entry:
Oracle Linux 5.7:
/dev/hdc on /media/Oracle_11gR2_x86-64 type udf (ro,nosuid,nodev,uid=0)Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.4
/dev/hdc on /media/Oracle_11gR2_x86-64 type udf (ro,noexec,nosuid,nodev,uid=0)I also wonder why there is a difference when using Ubuntu. In Ubuntu Linux (11.04) I can address the problem by installing "autofs" and modifying /etc/auto.misc to include the "exec" mount option. For instance:
cd -fstype=iso9660,ro,nosuid,nodev,exec :/dev/cdromHowever, under Oracle Enterprise Linux, modifying /etc/auto.misc has no affect.
I suspect the the differences are related to gnome-mount and HAL. I know how to work-around the problem, but I wonder if someone knows more details and when and what was changed regarding this issue between OEL 5.4 and OL 5.7
Thanks and kind regards.Meanwhile I found the source of information:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html-single/5.6_Technical_Notes/index.html#hal
5.6_Technical_Notes
Prior to this update, the "noexec" option was enforced when mounting CDs, preventing scripts on that media from being run automatically. However, this also prevented applications that rely on executing from media from working correctly. Since the intended level of protection provided by this feature is minimal, and there are other ways to achieve it, the feature has been removed and the "noexec" option is no longer enforced. -
Differences in optimizations during compilation between java 1.4 and 1.5
Hi
I have an application which frequently runs into out of memory error. After doing some profiling, I found that it has more to do with the throughput of the application. Because which, messages that have to be polled from a queue are not being dequeued. This application has been compiled in java 1.5. But when I compiled the same in java 1.4, I didn't get into this problem.
When I de-compiled the class files, I found that in 1.5, for every string concatenation, the compiler replaces it with StringBuilder() and appends the string. To check whether this object instantiation might be causing the trouble, I wrote a small snippet:
private static void doWithConcatenationOperator() {
for (int idx = 0; idx < fNumIterations; idx++) {
String result = "Does" + "StringBuilder()" + "reduce"
+ "ThroughPut" + "of the" + "Application";
private static void doWithStringBuilder() {
for (int idx = 0; idx < fNumIterations; idx++) {
(new StringBuilder()).append("Does").append("StringBuilder()")
.append("reduce").append("ThroughPut").append("of the")
.append("Application").toString();
When I iterate through these loops( 1 million iterations), the concatenation operation takes less than 16 milliseconds whereas the StringBuilder takes upwards of 512 milliseconds.
My question being; are there any other so called optimizations that can reduce the throughput when compiled in 1.5.
Thanks
Edited by: Incubus on Jan 18, 2009 11:00 PMIncubus wrote:
say I have a code that does:
public void StringConcat(){
int noOfIter = 10000;
for(int i = 0; i < noOfIter; i++){
String s = "String " + i + " Being " + i + "concatenated " + i + "using " + i + "String" + i + "Builder";
If I compile this in 1.4 ( i.e using javac -source 1.4); the decompiled code looks the same.
But if I do so in 1.5 ( i.e if I decompile the same code compiled using javac -source 1.5), this is how it looks:
public void StringConcat(){
int noOfIter = 10000;
for(int i = 0; i < noOfIter; i++){
String s = (new StringBuilder).append("String ").append( i).append( " Being ").append( i).append( "concatenated ").append( i).append( "using ").append( i).append( "String").append( i).append( "Builder").toString();
The above was the compile time optimization I was talking about.What makes you think that the decompiler is not the problem?
The ONLY difference between 1.5 and 1.4 in that case is that one uses StringBuilder and one uses StringBuffer. And StringBuffer is faster.
Just wanted to know, are there any other differences in compile time optimizations between 1.4 and 1.5.I suggest that you go look at the read me. And I also suggest that you become familar with byte codes and stop assuming that a decompiler is going to tell you anything. -
Differences in JCE policy files between java 1.4 and 1.5?
I'm using a app that needs JCE unlimited strength policy files to start. Attempting to start with limited strength policy files with Java 1.4 installed will give:
java.security.InvalidKeyException: InitVerify error: java.lang.RuntimeException: engineGetKeySize() is not supported by this cipher!
however, running the same app on java 1.5 with limited strength policy files does not give this problem. I've checked http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/jce/JCERefGuide.html#AppE and http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/security/jce/JCERefGuide.html#AppE and the maximum allowed keysizes are identical. Has something else changed in the JCE policy files between these java versions? Can anyone tell me what's going on?Incubus wrote:
say I have a code that does:
public void StringConcat(){
int noOfIter = 10000;
for(int i = 0; i < noOfIter; i++){
String s = "String " + i + " Being " + i + "concatenated " + i + "using " + i + "String" + i + "Builder";
If I compile this in 1.4 ( i.e using javac -source 1.4); the decompiled code looks the same.
But if I do so in 1.5 ( i.e if I decompile the same code compiled using javac -source 1.5), this is how it looks:
public void StringConcat(){
int noOfIter = 10000;
for(int i = 0; i < noOfIter; i++){
String s = (new StringBuilder).append("String ").append( i).append( " Being ").append( i).append( "concatenated ").append( i).append( "using ").append( i).append( "String").append( i).append( "Builder").toString();
The above was the compile time optimization I was talking about.What makes you think that the decompiler is not the problem?
The ONLY difference between 1.5 and 1.4 in that case is that one uses StringBuilder and one uses StringBuffer. And StringBuffer is faster.
Just wanted to know, are there any other differences in compile time optimizations between 1.4 and 1.5.I suggest that you go look at the read me. And I also suggest that you become familar with byte codes and stop assuming that a decompiler is going to tell you anything. -
How much of a difference is there, if any, between an MBP A1260 and MBP A1286??
I want to get a cover for my refurbished Macbook Pro and though my model # isn't "listed" in my System Preferences what I do get is MacBook Pro4,1 Early 2008. I asked through here if someone could tell me what model that was and I was told A1260. When I have searched for covers for my MBP A1260, I keep getting A1286. Is there a big difference or is that in the same series so that if I ordered the cover it would fit or it will be too big or too small?? Thanks for any help with this.........much appreciated.
Here is a view of the A1260 specs which are for an MBP early-2008 model 15".
And the A1286 specs which are for an MBP late-2008 and above model 15".
They are both 15" models so size-wise you shouldn't have a problem getting the cover you want for an A1286 model. -
Differences in JVM memory management in 1.4.2 and 1.5?
Hi all,
We have developed some code calling a third party dll through JNI. The code runs fine on jre 1.4.2. When we test in on jre 1.5, the dll is giving us a heap memory exhausted message. We have set -Xmx to 1024m due to performance issue. If we lower -Xmx from 1024m to 912m, then the program runs fine. So I have question if memory is being handled differently in 1.4.2 and 1.5?
Envirnoment: Windows XP, JRE 1.4.2 and 1.5, 1GB memory
Thanks all!Hi,
I keep some rules while developing JNI code:
- reduce to minimum use of Local Heap, try to use Global or Virtual memory,
- reduce to minimum a number of local/gobal references used, make shallow copy of the same reference like it is done in Windows COM,
- reduce to minimum a number of stack variables,
- be sure that JNI code has no memory leaks.
To solve these problems I have developed for MS Visual Studio tools
http://www.simtel.net//product.php%5bid%5d93174%5bSiteID%5dsimtel.net
http://www.simtel.net/product.php[id]94368[sekid]0[SiteID]simtel.net
The tools solve these problems and are used by other people in my company (for developing JNI code). They do not know anything about these issues. -
I have a big difference of free space between my 32GB iPod and 32GB iPad when sync'd with iTunes.
Why is there such a difference in my free space between my iPod Touch and my iPad (3) as indicated below:
iPod iPad
Songs 1,107 774
Videos 18 30
Photos 6,230 4,720
Apps 111 113
Capacity 28.4GB 28.0GB
Avail (Free) 15.6GB 3.2GB
Is there anyway of recapturing free space on my iPad without removing songs, pictures, applications, etc. ??How much space is Other using? You may be able to reduce.
How Do I Get Rid Of The “Other” Data Stored On My iPad Or iPhone?
http://tinyurl.com/85w6xwn
With an iOS device, the “Other” space in iTunes is used to store things like documents, settings, caches, and a few other important items. If you sync lots of documents to apps like GoodReader, DropCopy, or anything else that reads external files, your storage use can skyrocket. With iOS 5/6, you can see exactly which applications are taking up the most space. Just head to Settings > General > Usage, and tap the button labeled Show All Apps. The storage section will show you the app and how much storage space it is taking up. Tap on the app name to get a description of the additional storage space being used by the app’s documents and data. You can remove the storage-hogging application and all of its data directly from this screen, or manually remove the data by opening the app. Some applications, especially those designed by Apple, will allow you to remove stored data by swiping from left to right on the item to reveal a Delete button.
Cheers, Tom -
Hi,
I would like to ask about some information on iPhone 6Plus
Can i know whats the difference on these two models between Model A1586 (GSM)* and Model A1524 (GSM)* as shown in the Malaysia apple website?
If its different, then the product which consumer wanted to select, will it be all the model same price in Malaysia?
Thank you.
Your sincerely,
Nick"why should Apple manufacture the 2 models as different models?"
Apple doesn't manufacture two models with the same model number. The "1429" iPhone can utilze either the GSM or CDMA protocol, depending upon the carrier's system. In the US, Apple offers an unlocked "1428" iPhone 5, for use on GSM networks. I live in Bangkok, and Apple - and Premium Resellers - offer the "1429" iPhone, which can be used on either GSM or CDMA networks. -
Difference between Web Service URL and Report Manager URL
What is the difference between Web Service URL and Report Manager URL in Reporting Service configuration manager in SQl Server 2008 Reporting Setrvices
Another way to put it is the Web Service URL is just that, its used for services that are connecting to issue API calls. The Report Manager URL is the nice GUI that users should use. If you click the links, you should see the difference. I
am sure you have likely done that, but functionally one is for programmatic purposes and the other to be the front end graphical user interface.
Sometimes pictures help as well...
http://bretstateham.com/reporting-services-architecture-diagram%E2%80%A6/ -
Difference between Oracle GRC product and Identity management
Hi
I want to know the difference between Oracle GRC product and Oracle Identity and Access Management product. Also what I see that the features Acces manager is providing is also provided by the grc access control governor and transaction control governor. So why two different technology for same task.
RegardsAny answer.
regards -
Difference in Resource management between PPM and MRS
We have SAP CRM opportunities, PS Projects (no networks), No Plant Maint, No CS, Resources around 600, multi skill set tracking, global resource management pool, CATS timesheet.
is it necessary to install MRS for resource management or is PPM RM functionality sufficient?Hi Salim,
within PPM Resource Management you can staff resources to roles of the project and assign these to tasks. You can have a staffing directly within the project or there is a cross-project view in the Resource Management role of PPM. In PPM there are different scenarios who is allowed to staff (e.g. project lead, resource manager, extended process using candidate manager).
The demand on the role level can be defined either as a block without distribution (e.g. 40 days between 01.01.2013 and 31.12.2013) or distributed on monthly or weekly level (e.g. 2 days in Jan, 2 days in Feb).
Since MRS is a dedicated Resource Management tool there are additional functions in MRS.
It depends on your process if you require these in your scenario or nor. These addtional features e.g. include amongst other
- Graphical Visualization of the resource demands and staffings (see screenshot below)
- planning down to a daily level
- more flexible definition of multiple responsible resource managers
- optimized for handling of huge number of resources/requests
So as I wrote earlier it will probably not be possible to say what you should use without knowing the detail requirements.
Regards, Andrea -
Difference between 4.7 version and 6.0 version
what is the difference between 4.7 version and 6.0 version particularly as far as SD is concerned?
dear vinayak
There are so many differences between the version in different objects
I will explain in two or more objects the difference
1 in the customer master in 4.6 version there is no partner function tab in the customer in xd01 t-code
and also there is no CIN tab in that version
but it is there in the 4.7 EE version
This is the major change from the 4.6cc to 4.7EE
2. in 4.7EE there is some settings that are related for CIN
which cannot be done in 4.7EE that means they need some patches for doing the configuration setting for the CIN
But we can do the same in the 6.0 version
These are the some of the settings that are differed in the two versions and in that two objects
Re: Difference Between SAP Version ECC 4.6, 4.7, SAP 5.0, 6.0 with SA
Re: SAP version differences 4.5b, 4.6c and ECC6.0
You can find the difference in release notes of each SAP version.
Here are the links.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/fc/e3003deddfae4de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm50/helpdata/en/28/b34c40cc538437e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/43/68805bb88f297ee10000000a422035/frameset.htm
Please visit the following links:
http://service.sap.com/erp
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ (Functional prespective)
http://service.sap.com/instguides --> mySAP Business Suite Applications --> mySAP ERP --> mySAP ERP 2005 --> Upgrade
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOVC/LOVC.pdf
For Functionality Differences pls refer to the below site -
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
After opening the site, please select the Source Release Version which is 4.6 b Then Select the Target Release Version which is "mySAP ERP 2005" or ECC 6.0
Select the Solution Area like Financials, Human Capital Management, Sales....
Select module like MM, PP, SD, QM.....
Click on Search
Then it displays the Release Version and the Delta Functionality. which can be downloaded to a word document if required.
and also check the release notes of ECC 6.0 in service.sap.com.
rewards if it helps
siva -
What is difference between Service map iview and Workset Map iview
Hi Experts,
Can anyone tell me the difference between service map iView and Workset Map iView.
When I am creating these iViews, its seams both are same. I canu2019t find difference still, can anyone help me out of this
Thanks in Advance
JanardhanHi,
Service Map Iview:The Service Map iView is an ERP-specific variant of the portal Workset Map iView. It serves as a central point of entry and guided access to the services of SAP service modules such as the Manager Self Service (MSS) module, or the Employee Self Service (ESS) module.
Workset Map iview:A Workset Map is the equivalent of a site map, providing users with explicit information on the functionality that is available in a given workset. It is based on an iView, and serves as a central point of entry and guided access to the contents of a workset.
if you want to more info pls go thr the below thread
Workset Map iView
i hope it will help you
Thanks,
Sreeni. -
What is the difference between Condition Type PB00 and PBXX
Hallow all,
Can anybody please explain, What is the Difference between Condition type PB00 and PBXX in Materials Management Pricing?
And also please explain control or Application of both on Price determination ??
Thanks in Advance !!!!!Hi,
PB00 condition type is used for automatic pricing in PO
PBXX condition type is used for manual pricing in PO
In Pricing access sequence play a vital role . If you need pricing automatic in the PO, you have use of Access Sequences and Schema Group of Vendor.You can see the difference in both standard condition type PB00 and PBXX, where as PB00 is assigned to Access sequence(0002)but in case of PBXX no access sequense assigned.
Regards,
Biju K
Maybe you are looking for
-
HT201493 Why can't i see my friends contact picture in this app?
In find my friends app i can not see my friends photo but it is in my contact list on my iphone.Does anyone know why?
-
: not foundnd//.xinitrc: line 9: exec: startkde
starting KDE with kdm works perfect, however I'd prefer to start X in the 'Slackware tradition', without kdm, but with startx Unfortunately that causes the following problem: The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports: > Warning: Type "ONE_LEVEL
-
I'm concerned about so many changes
I've just got a message saying that if I sync with .mac, then 127 of the contacts on my computer will be modified. However, I cannot see any reason for this, as I do not have another computer, so the contacts on .mac have never been changed by me. I
-
Benefits of Using TREX for PLM Search
Hi All, Can somebody guide me on the benefits if we use TREX 7.1 with Embedded Search for PLM? Following are our requirements, whether this will be met with TREX 1) Will the TREX help to search Cross u2013Objects with same names, for ex, if we search
-
ABAP statement for JDBC connection to SQL server
Hi Gurus, i need to connect a WebDynpro abap to a SQL server. My OS is Unix so i cannot use a ODBC connection. Can anyone help me to know if it's possible to write an abap statement to connect the SQL server by JDBC connection? thanks a lot Regards C