Difference with CD auto-mount between OL 5.7 and OEL 5.4

Hello,
I'm experiencing a difference when auto-mounting a CD between OL 5.7 and OEL 5.4 (x86_64).
Under OEL 5.4, a CD does not have "execute" privileges.
The mount command shows the following relevant entry:
Oracle Linux 5.7:
/dev/hdc on /media/Oracle_11gR2_x86-64 type udf (ro,nosuid,nodev,uid=0)Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.4
/dev/hdc on /media/Oracle_11gR2_x86-64 type udf (ro,noexec,nosuid,nodev,uid=0)I also wonder why there is a difference when using Ubuntu. In Ubuntu Linux (11.04) I can address the problem by installing "autofs" and modifying /etc/auto.misc to include the "exec" mount option. For instance:
cd -fstype=iso9660,ro,nosuid,nodev,exec :/dev/cdromHowever, under Oracle Enterprise Linux, modifying /etc/auto.misc has no affect.
I suspect the the differences are related to gnome-mount and HAL. I know how to work-around the problem, but I wonder if someone knows more details and when and what was changed regarding this issue between OEL 5.4 and OL 5.7
Thanks and kind regards.

Meanwhile I found the source of information:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html-single/5.6_Technical_Notes/index.html#hal
5.6_Technical_Notes
Prior to this update, the "noexec" option was enforced when mounting CDs, preventing scripts on that media from being run automatically. However, this also prevented applications that rely on executing from media from working correctly. Since the intended level of protection provided by this feature is minimal, and there are other ways to achieve it, the feature has been removed and the "noexec" option is no longer enforced.

Similar Messages

Problem with Edit IN function between LR 2.3 and PS CS3

I recently upgraded my system to a Windows Vista 64 bit Core 2 Quad with 8 GB. Lightroom now works and loads images the way it should. I do have one major concern and need any help possible.
I am using LR 2.3 in 64 bit and PS CS3 ver 10.0.1 (which is 32 bit - loads slowly but otherwise works fine). The problem I am encountering is in LR Develop / Photo / Edit In... - using any of the menu items:
"Edit in Abode Photoshop CS3"
"Open as Smart Object In Photoshop"
"Merge to Panorama in Photoshop"
"Merge to HDR in Photoshop"
"Open as layers in Photoshop"
Photoshop opens but no image(s) are exported and I receive the message in LR - "The file could not be edited because Adobe Photoshop CS3 could not be launched."
Photoshop, however, was launched but no image exported and so I can't work on the image in PS. The appropriate TIFF image is created in LR for the first two menu items - nothing for the last three menu items.
I can create a partial work around by setting PS as an external editor, however, I can't use 4 of 5 of the menu items.
All the menu items work fine in Windows XPpro.
Any help is much appreciated.
PS I also tried the most recent Window 7 RC with exactly the same results.
Thanks
Bob

Don
I wasn't shouting - I just cut and paste the exact text and font in its original size and type as was shown in the message. Never had a thought that someone would be offended by cutting and pasting exactly what was in a message - it would appear that John Williams saw it for what it was.
However, sorry if I offended you.
Bob
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:15:15 -0600
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Problem with Edit IN function between LR 2.3 and PS CS3
There is no reason to shout. There are only other users here trying to help.
>

Differences in optimizations during compilation between java 1.4 and 1.5

Hi
I have an application which frequently runs into out of memory error. After doing some profiling, I found that it has more to do with the throughput of the application. Because which, messages that have to be polled from a queue are not being dequeued. This application has been compiled in java 1.5. But when I compiled the same in java 1.4, I didn't get into this problem.
When I de-compiled the class files, I found that in 1.5, for every string concatenation, the compiler replaces it with StringBuilder() and appends the string. To check whether this object instantiation might be causing the trouble, I wrote a small snippet:
private static void doWithConcatenationOperator() {
for (int idx = 0; idx < fNumIterations; idx++) {
String result = "Does" + "StringBuilder()" + "reduce"
+ "ThroughPut" + "of the" + "Application";
private static void doWithStringBuilder() {
for (int idx = 0; idx < fNumIterations; idx++) {
(new StringBuilder()).append("Does").append("StringBuilder()")
.append("reduce").append("ThroughPut").append("of the")
.append("Application").toString();
When I iterate through these loops( 1 million iterations), the concatenation operation takes less than 16 milliseconds whereas the StringBuilder takes upwards of 512 milliseconds.
My question being; are there any other so called optimizations that can reduce the throughput when compiled in 1.5.
Thanks
Edited by: Incubus on Jan 18, 2009 11:00 PM

Incubus wrote:
say I have a code that does:
public void StringConcat(){
int noOfIter = 10000;
for(int i = 0; i < noOfIter; i++){
String s = "String " + i + " Being " + i + "concatenated " + i + "using " + i + "String" + i + "Builder";
If I compile this in 1.4 ( i.e using javac -source 1.4); the decompiled code looks the same.
But if I do so in 1.5 ( i.e if I decompile the same code compiled using javac -source 1.5), this is how it looks:
public void StringConcat(){
int noOfIter = 10000;
for(int i = 0; i < noOfIter; i++){
String s = (new StringBuilder).append("String ").append( i).append( " Being ").append( i).append( "concatenated ").append( i).append( "using ").append( i).append( "String").append( i).append( "Builder").toString();
The above was the compile time optimization I was talking about.What makes you think that the decompiler is not the problem?
The ONLY difference between 1.5 and 1.4 in that case is that one uses StringBuilder and one uses StringBuffer. And StringBuffer is faster.
Just wanted to know, are there any other differences in compile time optimizations between 1.4 and 1.5.I suggest that you go look at the read me. And I also suggest that you become familar with byte codes and stop assuming that a decompiler is going to tell you anything.

Differences in JCE policy files between java 1.4 and 1.5?

I'm using a app that needs JCE unlimited strength policy files to start. Attempting to start with limited strength policy files with Java 1.4 installed will give:
java.security.InvalidKeyException: InitVerify error: java.lang.RuntimeException: engineGetKeySize() is not supported by this cipher!
however, running the same app on java 1.5 with limited strength policy files does not give this problem. I've checked http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/jce/JCERefGuide.html#AppE and http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/security/jce/JCERefGuide.html#AppE and the maximum allowed keysizes are identical. Has something else changed in the JCE policy files between these java versions? Can anyone tell me what's going on?

Incubus wrote:
say I have a code that does:
public void StringConcat(){
int noOfIter = 10000;
for(int i = 0; i < noOfIter; i++){
String s = "String " + i + " Being " + i + "concatenated " + i + "using " + i + "String" + i + "Builder";
If I compile this in 1.4 ( i.e using javac -source 1.4); the decompiled code looks the same.
But if I do so in 1.5 ( i.e if I decompile the same code compiled using javac -source 1.5), this is how it looks:
public void StringConcat(){
int noOfIter = 10000;
for(int i = 0; i < noOfIter; i++){
String s = (new StringBuilder).append("String ").append( i).append( " Being ").append( i).append( "concatenated ").append( i).append( "using ").append( i).append( "String").append( i).append( "Builder").toString();
The above was the compile time optimization I was talking about.What makes you think that the decompiler is not the problem?
The ONLY difference between 1.5 and 1.4 in that case is that one uses StringBuilder and one uses StringBuffer. And StringBuffer is faster.
Just wanted to know, are there any other differences in compile time optimizations between 1.4 and 1.5.I suggest that you go look at the read me. And I also suggest that you become familar with byte codes and stop assuming that a decompiler is going to tell you anything.

How much of a difference is there, if any, between an MBP A1260 and MBP A1286??

I want to get a cover for my refurbished Macbook Pro and though my model # isn't "listed" in my System Preferences what I do get is MacBook Pro4,1 Early 2008. I asked through here if someone could tell me what model that was and I was told A1260. When I have searched for covers for my MBP A1260, I keep getting A1286. Is there a big difference or is that in the same series so that if I ordered the cover it would fit or it will be too big or too small?? Thanks for any help with this.........much appreciated.

Here is a view of the A1260 specs which are for an MBP early-2008 model 15".
And the A1286 specs which are for an MBP late-2008 and above model 15".
They are both 15" models so size-wise you shouldn't have a problem getting the cover you want for an A1286 model.

Differences in CIN management between Labview 5.0 and Labview 7.1 ?

Hi,
I'm using a VI on a two photon microscope. It steers the laser beam in the sample (quite the same way as a TV scan, scanning a fast line on the X axis, then moving the line down) controlling two mirrors by the PCI-MIO-16E-4 Multifunctions card on traditional DAQ and at the same time it serves as the acquitision through a non-NI DSP Multifunction-board with on-board buffers and hight data throughput (70 Mb/s).
It is this part of the program which gives us strong headaches since we have upgraded to a new PC.
On the old machine we used Win2k and Labview 5.0; on the new machine we planned to use WinXP Pro and Labview 7.1.
The acquisition part of the VI uses 2 CINs. One is used to configure the FPGA on the Multifunctions board at initialization.
The second CIN reads he buffers received from the board and puts them into the shape of an image.
Now since we tried in WinXP Pro and Labview 7.1, we get some kind of weird bugs. Either there is a big problem concerning the synchronization of the mirros with the acquisition or with the image reconstruction. We have already tried :
1. Putting everything back into the old machine to verify there has not been any damage to the boards. OK
2. Using the boards in the new machine but with Win2000 and Labiew 5.0, just to be sure that there are no conflicting elements in the hardware. OK
As we wanted to check everything slowly but surely we then installed LV 7.1 on the new machine but still with Win2k. And here the problem appears !
First we thought the drivers for the Multifunctions board (ATEME Adr128C6x) were not compatible with WinXP Pro, so at this point we were quite surprised to notice the problem seems to be caused by the upgrade from LV 5.0 to 7.1 !
Now, finally my question is : Are there any major changes in how Labview handles CINs between LV5.0 and 7.1 ?
Can the problem be caused by the

So, no answer,...
Anyhow, we found the problem on our own. For anyone else experiencing this kind of behaviour :
The problem did not have anything to do with our CINs, nor with XP.
In fact, we have noticed that the Analog Ground the Digital Ground had to be connected. For some kind of reason in LabView 5.0 this did not introduce the problem. But in Labview 7.1 the sync, because of a somewhat unstable Ground, it caused complete disfunctionment. We don't know why but, hey, the problem is gone.

Is anyone having problems with the Bluetooth connection between the iPhone 5s and Renault Media Nav is so is there a solution.

IiPhone 5s Bluetooth problem with Renault media Nav very poor connection, both phone and media Nav are up to date software is there a solution

Here we use MediaNav with iPhone4s, 5, and 5s. I use spotify to stream music, it works great. But each approx. 15s the signal drops for a moment.
I believe there is nothing wrong with the bluetooth connection of the iPhones, as I use them with other audio systems.
The link belows shows the following stated:
"There is a fault with the MediaNav Bluetooth connection when streaming music."
"Renault are aware of the fault and will not be telling any new customers"
"It is not a priority"
"There is no timescale for a fix"
http://www.shesaidbeauty.com/sammakeup/blog/renault-clio-medianav-bluetooth-faul t-830095

I have a big difference of free space between my 32GB iPod and 32GB iPad when sync'd with iTunes.

Why is there such a difference in my free space between my iPod Touch and my iPad (3) as indicated below:
                        iPod               iPad
Songs               1,107               774
Videos                   18                30
Photos               6,230           4,720
Apps                    111               113
Capacity           28.4GB          28.0GB
Avail (Free)       15.6GB            3.2GB
Is there anyway of recapturing free space on my iPad without removing songs, pictures, applications, etc. ??

How much space is Other using? You may be able to reduce.
How Do I Get Rid Of The “Other” Data Stored On My iPad Or iPhone?
http://tinyurl.com/85w6xwn
With an iOS device, the “Other” space in iTunes is used to store things like documents, settings, caches, and a few other important items. If you sync lots of documents to apps like GoodReader, DropCopy, or anything else that reads external files, your storage use can skyrocket. With iOS 5/6, you can see exactly which applications are taking up the most space. Just head to Settings > General > Usage, and tap the button labeled Show All Apps. The storage section will show you the app and how much storage space it is taking up. Tap on the app name to get a description of the additional storage space being used by the app’s documents and data. You can remove the storage-hogging application and all of its data directly from this screen, or manually remove the data by opening the app. Some applications, especially those designed by Apple, will allow you to remove stored data by swiping from left to right on the item to reveal a Delete button.
 Cheers, Tom

What are the difference between Model A1586 (GSM)* and Model A1524 (GSM)* as shown in the apple website?

Hi,
I would like to ask about some information on iPhone 6Plus
Can i know whats the difference on these two models between Model A1586 (GSM)* and Model A1524 (GSM)* as shown in the Malaysia apple website?
If its different, then the product which consumer wanted to select, will it be all the model same price in Malaysia?
Thank you.
Your sincerely,
Nick

"why should Apple manufacture the 2 models as different models?"
Apple doesn't manufacture two models with the same model number. The "1429" iPhone can utilze either the GSM or CDMA protocol, depending upon the carrier's system. In the US, Apple offers an unlocked "1428" iPhone 5, for use on GSM networks. I live in Bangkok, and Apple - and Premium Resellers - offer the "1429" iPhone, which can be used on either GSM or CDMA networks.

Auto-mounting USB storage devices doesn't work

Hi all,
I have some problems with the auto-mounting of USB storage devices. I already installed udisks and ntfs-3g.
When I connect the external device (it's an external hard disk WD My Passport 500GB, but I have the same problem with a SanDisk USB stick 8GB) the auto-mount doesn't work. I see a shorcut in the left panel of Thunar but if I try to use it Thunar crash without any message error.
I try with the manual mount and it works, but the left panel of Thunar continue to have the same problem.
In the italian Arch forum a friend suggest me to open Thunar from bash and close it. If I do it I receive this error log:
$ thunar
thunar: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: undefined symbol: _ZNSt14error_categoryD2Ev, version GLIBCXX_3.4.15
and this is the reply of dmesg command:
[ 340.826768] usb 1-1: new high speed USB device number 2 using ehci_hcd
[ 341.591397] Initializing USB Mass Storage driver...
[ 341.592166] scsi6 : usb-storage 1-1:1.0
[ 341.592345] usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage
[ 341.592349] USB Mass Storage support registered.
[ 341.599805] usbcore: registered new interface driver uas
[ 342.591094] scsi 6:0:0:0: Direct-Access WD My Passport 070A 1032 PQ: 0 ANSI: 4
[ 342.591474] sd 6:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0
[ 342.592845] scsi 6:0:0:1: CD-ROM WD Virtual CD 070A 1032 PQ: 0 ANSI: 4
[ 342.593048] scsi 6:0:0:1: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 5
[ 342.594050] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] 975400960 512-byte logical blocks: (499 GB/465 GiB)
[ 342.594814] scsi 6:0:0:2: Enclosure WD SES Device 1032 PQ: 0 ANSI: 4
[ 342.595141] scsi 6:0:0:2: Attached scsi generic sg3 type 13
[ 342.596546] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[ 342.596553] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 23 00 10 00
[ 342.596557] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 342.599163] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 342.618228] sdb: sdb1
[ 342.621039] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 342.621046] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
[ 342.665174] sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 51x/51x caddy
[ 342.665180] cdrom: Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
[ 342.665447] sr 6:0:0:1: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0
[ 342.665654] ses 6:0:0:2: Attached Enclosure device
[ 349.105348] [b]Thunar[996]: segfault at 0 ip b6de1660 sp bfe586f4 error 4 in libglib-2.0.so.0.2800.8[b6d6f000+ed000][/b]
Do you have any suggestion?
Thank you very much,
Gianluca

Are you using [testing]? Partially updated system?
The error looks like you have a different version of gcc-libs / glibc than the app was built against.
Last edited by Mr.Elendig (2011-06-20 19:16:33)

[SOLVED]External HD: Auto-mount in read-only and only root can access

So I followed the advice in http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 88#p583088 regarding using udev to auto-mount my external 60gb harddrive, and it works. The only problem is, it is being mounted read-only and I can only view the contents via sudo or as the superuser.
Can anyone guide me in the right direction I need to go to get this changed? I have already once tried to recursively chown everything on the harddrive, but that didn't seem to work. The syntax I used from that above article specifies "rw" as one of the options for the mount command, so I am stumped as to why this happened.
Thanks
Last edited by trann (2009-11-13 16:24:36)

Wattanut wrote:
Have you installed ntfs-3g?
I think I've had that problem before.
WoW, perfect solution. This is why I love this distro.

Smb-sharing auto-mounted ntfs-3g hotplugged device

hi@all,
i have a smb-share for /media. i've got up to 2 partitions mounted there: one internal., mounted via fstab (/dev/sda2 /media/Transfer ntfs-3g locale=de_DE.utf8 0 0) and 1 that gets mounted automatically via udisk/gvfs (not really sure, the default gnome mounting routine^^). i can access sda2 without problems over a samba share, but when i try to open the external hdd, samba requests a user and a password, though it's the same share in the smb.conf. someone in the irc mentioned to put it into the fstab, either, but then the auto-mounting doesn't work anymore (and the external isn't connected everytime the pc boots up). anyone knows how to get this working?
btw, here's how the external hdd gets mounted:
/dev/sdc1 on /media/Extern type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,allow_other,blksize=4096,default_permissions)
and the smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = Arbeitsgruppe
server string = Samba Server
netbios name = ArchBox
security = share
wins support = no
[Media]
path = /media
available = yes
browsable = yes
public = yes
writable = yes
thx for your help,
das_coach
PS: sorry for my bad english, i hope you know what i meant^^ and if you need further information, just ask=)
@mods: i hope this is the right section, it's more the mounting-thing than samba i think^^

hi@all,
i have a smb-share for /media. i've got up to 2 partitions mounted there: one internal., mounted via fstab (/dev/sda2 /media/Transfer ntfs-3g locale=de_DE.utf8 0 0) and 1 that gets mounted automatically via udisk/gvfs (not really sure, the default gnome mounting routine^^). i can access sda2 without problems over a samba share, but when i try to open the external hdd, samba requests a user and a password, though it's the same share in the smb.conf. someone in the irc mentioned to put it into the fstab, either, but then the auto-mounting doesn't work anymore (and the external isn't connected everytime the pc boots up). anyone knows how to get this working?
btw, here's how the external hdd gets mounted:
/dev/sdc1 on /media/Extern type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,allow_other,blksize=4096,default_permissions)
and the smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = Arbeitsgruppe
server string = Samba Server
netbios name = ArchBox
security = share
wins support = no
[Media]
path = /media
available = yes
browsable = yes
public = yes
writable = yes
thx for your help,
das_coach
PS: sorry for my bad english, i hope you know what i meant^^ and if you need further information, just ask=)
@mods: i hope this is the right section, it's more the mounting-thing than samba i think^^

Hello. I have a problem with OEL 6.5 and ocfs2. When I mount ocfs2 with mount -a command all ocfs2 partitions mount and work, but when I reboot no ocfs2 partitions auto mount. No error messages in log. I use DAS FC and iSCSI FC.

Hello.
I have a problem with OEL 6.5 and ocfs2.
When I mount ocfs2 with mount -a command all ocfs2 partitions mount and work, but when I reboot no ocfs2 partitions auto mount. No error messages in log. I use DAS FC and iSCSI FC.
fstab:
UUID=32130a0b-2e15-4067-9e65-62b7b3e53c72 /some/4 ocfs2 _netdev,defaults 0 0
#UUID=af522894-c51e-45d6-bce8-c0206322d7ab /some/9 ocfs2 _netdev,defaults 0 0
UUID=1126b3d2-09aa-4be0-8826-0b2a590ab995 /some/3 ocfs2 _netdev,defaults 0 0
#UUID=9ea9113d-edcf-47ca-9c64-c0d4e18149c1 /some/8 ocfs2 _netdev,defaults 0 0
UUID=a368f830-0808-4832-b294-d2d1bf909813 /some/5 ocfs2 _netdev,defaults 0 0
UUID=ee816860-5a95-493c-8559-9d528e557a6d /some/6 ocfs2 _netdev,defaults 0 0
UUID=3f87634f-7dbf-46ba-a84c-e8606b40acfe /some/7 ocfs2 _netdev,defaults 0 0
UUID=5def16d7-1f58-4691-9d46-f3fa72b74890 /some/1 ocfs2 _netdev,defaults 0 0
UUID=0e682b5a-8d75-40d1-8983-fa39dd5a0e54 /some/2 ocfs2 _netdev,defaults 0 0

What is the output of:
# chkconfig --list o2cb
# chkconfig --list ocfs2
# cat /etc/ocfs2/cluster.conf

How does muse tell the difference between a temporary site and my free 5 sites with my creative cloud membership?

how does muse tell the difference between a temporary site and my free 5 sites i get with my creative cloud membership?
because they both use .businesscatalyst.com and there's no option to say that it is a temporary site not a finished site i wish to publish to my creative cloud account.

Since this is an open forum, not Adobe support... you need to contact Adobe staff to help
Adobe contact information - http://helpx.adobe.com/contact.html
-Select your product and what you need help with
-Click on the blue box "Still need help? Contact us"

Auto mount with emelFM2

I am using emelFM2 file manager. I am wondering how to enable auto mount/unmount of USB drives with it? I see an icon around the bottom right to "mount and unmount a device". But it seems not working properly. Or do I have to set up some permission for emelFM2 to mount and unmount?

try zuluMount[1]
it will give you an option to auto mount the newly attached drive as well as auto open a default file manager on successful mounts.
you can get it as part of zuluCrypt project from this link[2]
Its a desktop environment/file manager independent GUI based solution for encrypted and unencrypted device management.
[1] http://code.google.com/p/zulucrypt/wiki … creenshots
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zulucrypt/

Difference with CD auto-mount between OL 5.7 and OEL 5.4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for