Different Recipients of Alerts in DEV and PRD Systems.

Dear All
I wanted to know if it is possible to configure different set of recipients for an alert category in XI DEV and XI PRD systems.
For example i have two groups "Group A" and "Group B" which should recieve alert mails.For this ,
we can create 2 different roles in XI  DEV  i.e. "Role_A" and "Role_B" and assign user id's to these roles  and then assign these roles to Alert Category using the "Recipients Via User Roles" option .This is done in XI DEV system.
My question is it possible that alert mails are just sent to "Role_B" in the XI PRD system. (not to ROLE_A). As ideally we would be transporting the alert categories from DEV> QAS> PRD can we have different recipients configurations in DEV and PRD.
Please suggest.
regards
Nilesh.

Hi Nilesh,
Yes it is possible, Just change the receipent of alert category on PRD system (you can change receipent anytime you want).
Regards,
Gourav
reward points if it helps you

Similar Messages

  • Wage type characteristics variation in Dev and PRD system

    Hi All,
    We have a wage type for ex: 9501, We will be entering the WT in infotype 15 and the in the payslip it will be in payments section.
    When I enter value 50 in DEV system, it is showing 50 in payslip under payments section but in PRD system the same scenario reacts as 46.53 in the payslip when we enter 50 in infotype 15. Not sure why it is behaving in such a way, any ideas?
    With Regards,
    Giriesh M

    Hi Sikindar,
    Thank you for the respond. I have checked where it get changed and it was happening in GVAL. Later I find out that it is based on /801 splits ( it has 2 splits and based on the first record it was producing such result). As I am new to functional side it is bit struggle to know from where I have to analyse. Your suggestions helped me to find out. Thanks a lot.
    With Regards,
    Giriesh M

  • OSS Patch Comparison between DEV and PRD systems

    Hi All,
    Can you provide me the steps how to compare SNOTE applied in BI Development and BI Production.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jelina

    check this
    OSS Note Patch Implemented?
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/472443f2-0c01-0010-20ab-fbd380d45881?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true

  • FB60 screen change layout different between DEV and PRD

    Hi,
    I'm having problem with transaction FB60. When i try to change the layout in PRD, in screen Edit System Setting, some of the field showing 0 length. For example in WBS element field, in DEV show length 24 but PRD show length 0. I try to compare the version but it is same (program & table structure - ACGL_ITEM). When I debug the program, found out that it will get the structure from sap internal c program call 'AB_GET_CX_DATA'. So, maybe this program version are different between DEV and PRD.
    Anybody knows what is the cause of this problem? Or maybe somebody can tell me how to check sap internal c program.
    Thank you very much.

    Yes. FB60 is Enter Vendor Invoice. In this screen you can see a table with column such as GL Acct, Debit/Credit, Amount in DC, Cost Center and others. You can add or remove some of the field using Table Setting and create Screen Variant. My problem is, the length of WBS Element and Profit Center field is 0. How to change the length.
    I already searched in forum but I only found how to create screen variant.
    Thanks.

  • Which system is better making the TDC among DEV and PRD

    HI,
    which system is better making the TDC among DEV and PRD what are the advantages and disadvantages
    thanks in advance
    subbu

    hi arif
    TDC means Transport Domain Controller
    it is the system which contains common transport directory and which administer the all the systems taking part in TMS.
    if any other informaion regarding this welcome.
    SUBBU
    Message was edited by:
            subbu chennuru

  • How to add EP(DEV and QAS and PRD systems in solution manager)

    Dear Gurus,
    I want to include EP dev and qality and prodution systems in solution manager .
    While installation of EP(only ASJAVA it is not having ASABAP) i selected solution manager as a Central SLD. But i deleted the systems in solution manger and recreated it again. I created all the systems and datatabae and logical components but in maintenane optimizer it is showing only production system but it is not showing development and quality systems in maintenance optimizer.
    How to see developmnet and quality systems in maintenace optimizer.
    Same thing for ECC also.
    ECC dev and quality systems installed in the same server.
    In maintenace optimizer it is showing only dev sysetm it not showing quality sysetm.
    Can any body help this probelm.
    Thanks & Regards
    Rao.

    I think you need to adjust your filter settings in the initial screen of MOPZ.
    It's in the right top corner.

  • Consistency between dev and prod systems!!!!

    Hi All,
    I wuld like to check the consistency between Dev and Prod systems for all the Data model and other objects existing. I would like to do this sanity check to see whether the two systems are in sync. Are there any tools or transaction codes within SAP framework which can guide me in this direction.
    Kind Regards,
    Surya Tamada.

    Hi Surya ,
    First build whole data flow :
    1 .Create Infoarea ,Infoobjects & Masterdata ,Infoproviders ,Infoobject Catelog under Infoarea,MetaData - Characteristics MeteData - Key Figures 
    2 DSOs  ,Infocubes ,Infosets, Multiproviders ,Views in the development system ,Datasources for BW system,Flat File Datasources,Transformations
    then get data from the se11 tables as per your requirement :
    like RSDVCHA ,RSDBCHATR,RSDCUBEIOBJ,RSDICMULTIIOBJ etc and built view on it  as per your requirement .
    then built flat file data sources and transformation .
    get all data downloaded to flat file in ur PC .In the same way from other system.
    make flow from PC File Datasource -> DSO -> Infocube and build queries for different objects .load the downloaded files to them and then run query .
    ex : query to compare cube will take cube name and systems name as input and compare objects .
    Regards,
    Jaya

  • Trnsporting of iboun and outbound Idoc interface to QA and PRD systems

    Hi,
    We have successfully completes the developement of our File to/From Idoc scenarios on Dev environment. Can some tell me how can I transport these to QA and PRD systems? How about the WE21 BD54(On Bus Sys) IDX1 and IDX2 configurations transports? Do we need to do them searately on each of the systems? Or they are transfereable too?
    Thanks.
    Sri.

    There are two ways to Transport XI objects-
    1) File Import/Export -- Simple and easy.
    2) CMS
    CMS is somewhat standard way to do. Becuase you can track the objects. But for this you need to install the CMS separately.
    just go thru these quick links-
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/e1/69a740aa053a13e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    XI Software Logistics Solution III: CMS
    Also check in service.sap.com- for how to guides-
    https://websmp201.sap-ag.de/nw-howtoguides
    The other way is using CMS. Refer to following series of blogs for step by step process.
    XI Software Logistics 1: SLD Preparation
    XI Software Logistics II: Overview
    XI Software Logistics Solution III: CMS
    Refer to how to guides for setting up CMS.
    https://websmp106.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01200252310000071155&
    1. WE21 -- Creating Port--.
    Yes. You can do them separately in individual system.
    2. BD54 -- Logical system. You can create in individual system or you can transport the table having  logical system entry i.e. TBDLS and TBDLST.
    Hope this will help.
    Nilesh

  • Is ST-PI and ST-A/PI needs to be installed in DEV and Quality Systems.

    Environment:
    ERP and BI 6.0 / Windows / SQLServer 2005
    Hi All,
    Is ST-PI and ST-A/PI needs to be applied to DEV and Quality Systems of ERP and BW.
    I understand that ST-PI and ST-A/PI are necessary for Production Environment.
    Is it recommended to install or upgrade the same in Dev and Quality Systems of ERP and BW.
    Because I believe it is always good practice to keep all systems Support Packages including ST-PI and ST-A/PI the same in the same Landscape. (But could not find any documents from SAP.)
    Thanks and Best Regards,
    Raghunahth L.

    Hi Raghu,
    you can get into the problems which I have said if you dont implement that,also many support packs do have their dependencies on ST-PI and ST-A/PI and seriously I havent heard people implementing this on prod and not dev and qa....I have worked on with many big clients but never heard this
    Also if you ignore whatever I have said,still it is still recommended that you never apply anything directly on Production,It is always better if you first implement on dev and qa and see if you are facing any issues while implementing...so its always better to implement on dev and then qa
    and It doesnt take too much of time,so that should not be an issue after all
    Always follow SAP best Practices
    Rohit

  • TOBJ entries missing from upgrade dev and test systems

    Hi,
    We are in the process of ECC Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 and upgraded our dev and test systems. We missing some SAP defined object entries in TOBJ table from dev and test. Because of this some of the roles getting transport errors if the roles contain those missing objects. We tried to transport the missing entries but we don't see any provision for that. Does any one through an idea to move those missing entries from dev to test. Not sure we will get same error in production. This table updates during upgrade and may be we missed some thing in test as though we followed the same upgrade process for both systems.
    Thank you
    Venkat

    Possibly you are no longer licensed for components which these objects are called from in their concepts.
    In that case the ability to start the component objects should be removed as well.
    Of course if some Z-programs checked these objects or SAP's own "package concept" extended syntax checks did not respect them then you might have problems.
    This should normally only apply to manual authorization instances, as if you had upgraded the roles and regenerated them, then you would not have this problem (in the roles).
    It tells us something about how you or someone else without any training have built these roles (or subsequently mucked them up...)...
    When reading stuff like this, I am always of two minds...
    1) SAP should make the concepts simpler and more intuitive to use without "cowboy" activities allowed by users with SAP_ALL etc.
    2) Customers should bleed for their own sins for not training people appropriatly (here, faking CV's is also ma major pest!).
    It is always a bit of a cat & mouse game and ends up in forums such as SDN in the long run.
    Some of it might also have become "available" to be used by SAP (I believe it was the 6.20 upgrade which installed everything...).
    Real bugger. I would accept it and test as best you can. You can also compare "where.used-lists" and "code scans" before and after the upgrade to see whether it is used by foreign repository objects.
    The scan is more reliable here, as sometimes the object name itself is a variable from a data declaration or condition which you cannot see in the "procedural" code.
    Cheers,
    Julius

  • Risks when maintain only one SolMan system for DEV, QAS and PRD systems

    What are the risks involved when maintaining only one solution manager system for entire client landscape(Small size).
    Or No risks are involved?
    Or Is this the SAP rrecommended approach for small size landscapes?
    One SolMan system -> DEV and QAS and another SolMan system -> PRD.

    >
    Sanjai Prabu Govindan wrote:
    > What are the risks involved when maintaining only one solution manager system for entire client landscape(Small size).
    > Or No risks are involved?
    Anand: Risks Involved depends on what all aspects\Scenarios the Solution Manager System is used for. It Could be used for the following purposes
    1) Service Desk
    2) Solution Monitoring
    3) System Monitoring
    4) Change Management
    How do you propose to use the Solman system ?
    >
    > Or Is this the SAP rrecommended approach for small size landscapes?
    > One SolMan system -> DEV and QAS and another SolMan system -> PRD.
    Anand: This is the most idealistic and SAP recommended way of using Solman....it always better to have it this way no matter in how many scenarios you intend to use Solman for....
    Regards,
    Anand.....

  • Different Sales Organization in CRM DEV,QAS,PRD

    Hi,
    Is anyone knows how to correct inconsistent sales organization in DEV, QAS & PRD, meaning number series of sales organization units in DEV is not same with the QAS and PRD. With this situation, pricing in CRM online and internet sales is not consistent with what in R/3 and i'm getting error while doing CRMD_ORDER.
    Please help! Rewards await.
    Thank you very much.
    Earl G. Faren

    Hi Ravi Yadav,
    Thank you for the reply!
    I tried transporting the Org model but still when I tried creating a sales order using CRMD_ORDER, the system still unable to get the right base/list price and then when I check one of the condition tables (CNCCRMPRSAP004 & CNCCRMPRSAP005) it still contains the wrong sales org unit number series. Do I need to do the initial loading R3AS (R/3 to CRM)? to overwrite the entries of those condition tables?
    Please advise what to do next.
    Thank you.
    Earl G. Faren

  • Solution Manager DEV and PRD box

    In my landscape i have 2 systems for solution manager SMD and SMP , what is the ideal way sap community is using them ...should i divide the solman roles among them or how the 2 system landscape of solman is used ..
    Regards

    Hello Tiger,
    In my experience many SAP customers have a one or two system landscape in Solution Manager.
    For customers whose main line of business is providing service with the Solution Manager, I would recommend a three system landscape (dev, qas and prd). For customers who run less critical functionality with Solution Manager, and when costs of hosts for the Solution Manager systems are an issue, one or two tier system landscapes can be also considered. Other than this, I don't know any document with precise guidelines to answer your question. At the end it all depends on the scenarios you want to run, and how critical the functionality you run with Solution Manager is for your company.
    Best regards,
    Miguel Ariñ

  • Does two seperate client required if the solman monitors DEV and QAS system

    Hi All,
    This is our client landscape:
    1 Dev-SolMan->For all development and quality systems(ECC 6.0, BI and EP).
    1 PRD-SolMan->For all production systems(ECC 6.0, BI and EP).
    Note: We have build only DEV-SolMan system as of now and we haven't done any configuration yet like either service desk or ChaRm.
    The question is:
    Do we need to have two seperate clients in DEV-Solman, one for all development systems and one for all quality systems? or Can we have a single client in DEV-Solman to handle all development and quality systems? What is the  SAP recommented approach?
    Thanks
    Sanjai

    Hi,
    you even don't need separate Solution Manager systems to monitor DEV / QA and Prod. You could use one SolMan client to monitor and administrate all systems / clients.
    Maybe it would be a good idea to create different Solution Landscapes, but this depends on your need.
    Separate clients are no good option, because CHARM can only activated in on client. Also if you plan to activate charm, you need a solution that contains all systems in your transport landscape (DEV, QAnad Prod).
    Kind Regards,
    Holger

  • DataSource / Structures mismatched between Dev and Test Systems. ..!!

    Hi,
    We are doing a scenario. Where XI will update the data into PSA through ABAP proxy.
    Scenario worked perfectly in development system.
    We transported the objects from Dev to test. The Strucures are mismatched in SE11 between development and Test systems as below.
    Data sources (ZDS_RECIHDR and ZDS_RECTPALL) looks ok. But when I saw the structures in SE11 they are not correct, they got mismatched.
    Development:
    /BIC/CQZDS_REC00001000 - Header (ZDS_RECIHDR)
    /BIC/CQZDS_REC00003000 - Allocation (ZDS_RECTPALL)
    Test:
    /BIC/CQZDS_REC00001000 - Allocation (ZDS_RECTPALL)
    /BIC/CQZDS_REC00003000 - Header (ZDS_RECIHDR)
    Kindly let me know where it might have gone wrong?
    Thanks
    Deepthi

    We done it already. Still it is failing.
    While transporting, it is failing and showing the error as
    Program ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_ALLOCATION1=CP, Include ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_ALLOCATION1=CM001: Syntax error in line 000016
    The data object 'L_S_DATA' has no component called'/BIC/ZSALENUM', but there is a component called
    Program ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_HEADER======CP, Include ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_HEADER======CM001: Syntax error in line 000016
    The data object 'L_S_DATA' has no component called'/BIC/ZTRANDATE', but there are the following com
    The Structure is mismatched in SE11 between header and allocation structures. That is the reason it is failing.
    Any more ideas pls?

Maybe you are looking for