Different structure types in itab

hello experts,
how can i fill the itab with different structure types.
if i give the componenttype/domain to 'any' in my structure declaration, then its not saving and showing the error.
how to solve this problem
thanks
Tim

Hi,
I think there is no general structure which accepts data of any types. I have the doubt why you need one internal table for storing data of different structure. You can declare multiple internal tables and store corresponding structure to that itab.
If you are looking for some internal table type whose structure can be dynamic then you can go for Field symbols table which is of form
field-symbols <itab> type standard table.
this can hold data of any structure.
but not rows of different structure ( which i think have no reason to be so )
Cheers
Kothand

Similar Messages

Sending itab with different structure in form-perfomr

Hello,
I have a
perform generate_master tables itab1.
perform generate_master tables itab1.
form generate_master tables itab structure ?.
loop at itab into wa_itab.
lv_werks = wa_itab-werks.
endloop.
endform.
here the structure for wa_ will be different.
Can anyone help me with this.
Alternate solutions are welcome.
Regards
Renu

Hi Renu,
if you want to process tables of different structures in the form, you can
- pass the structure name
FORM generate_master
changing itab type table
using    strucname type tabname.
field-symbols:
<rec1> type strucname1,
<rec2> type strucname2.
case strucname.
    when 'STRUCNAME1'.
    loop at itab assigning <rec1>.
      write: / <rec1>-field1.
    endloop.
    when 'STRUCNAME2'.
    loop at itab assigning <rec2>.
      write: / <rec2>-field2.
    endloop.
endcase.
endform.
- try to find you fields and decide on success for this
FORM generate_master
changing itab type table.
field-symbols:
<rec> type any,
<fld> type any,
loop at itab assigning <rec>.
    assign component 'FIELD1' of structure <rec> to <fld>.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      write: / <fld>.
    endif.
    assign component 'FIELD2' of structure <rec> to <fld>.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      write: / <fld>.
    endif,
endloop.
endform.
And then use
PERFORM CHANGING itab[].
Note:
LOOP AT itab ASSIGNING <field-symbol>.
is never slower, in most cases much faster than
LOOP AT itab INTO wa.
And you can never forget the MODIFY statement because you work with the table record directly.
Regards
Clemens

Pass the internal table with different structures to the class module

Hi ,
I have created a class method to fill up the data in XML format. the method can be called from various programs with internal table with different structures. I want to pass it as dynamic How can I do that.
I tried to declare that as type any.
but not working.
regards,
Madhuri

Hi,
You could work with data reference.
Use GET REFERENCE OF itab INTO data_ref for passing the internal table to your method, and dereference it within the method with ASSIGN statement...
DATA: lr_data TYPE REF TO data.
GET REFERENCE OF itab INTO lr_data.
CALL METHOD meth EXPORTING pr_data = lr_data.
METHOD meth.
FIELD-SYMBOLS <fs> TYPE ANY TABLE
ASSIGN pr_data->* TO <fs>.
ENDMETHOD.
Kr,
Manu.

How can i map a file with different structures to several deep structures?

Hey experts,
here is my situation. I have to build a file2file scenario. The file has a flat structure without any separators. Depending on the value of the keyfield, i have to determinate, which kind of structure in the current sequence there is. Like i wrote, there isn't any fieldseparator, but for every possible structure (overall 4 types) i know the type by the length of every field in the structure.
My task is:
1. Read the file into PI and transform to XML
2. Map the flat structure depending on the keyvalue to the deep structure
3. Transform several fields in the different structures like the requirement
4. Write back the file via FTP as the same flat structure as before
Do you have any approach to solve the item number 2 (the other steps are clear for me)?
Do i need several mapping-programs? If so, how can i determinate the right mapping-program, deping on the keyvalue?
Thanks in advance
Tobi

Here the inbound payload:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns:MT_MULTI_TYPES xmlns:ns="namespace">
- <VORSATZ>
<ZSATA>0</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>000</BUZEI>
<ERDAT>20080905</ERDAT>
<UZEIT>000549</UZEIT>
<ZPROG>PGRR3010</ZPROG>
<ZLIEF>T</ZLIEF>
<START>20080905</START>
<ZFILL />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</VORSATZ>
- <KOPFSATZ>
<ZSATA>1</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>000</BUZEI>
<BUDAT>20080904</BUDAT>
<BLDAT>20080904</BLDAT>
<XBLNR />
<WAERS />
<HWAE2>EUR</HWAE2>
<HWAE3 />
<KURS2>000000000</KURS2>
<KURS3>000000000</KURS3>
<BKTXT />
<ZFILK />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</KOPFSATZ>
- <POSITIONSSATZ>
<ZSATA>4</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>001</BUZEI>
<KOART>S</KOART>
<SHKZG>S</SHKZG>
<NEWKO>30611102</NEWKO>
<GSBER>17AB</GSBER>
<ZUBUK />
<VBUND />
<WRBTR>0000000000000</WRBTR>
<ZBTR1>0000000057576</ZBTR1>
<ZBTR2>0000000000000</ZBTR2>
<ZSTEU />
<VALUT>20080904</VALUT>
<KOSTL />
<AUFNR />
<ZUONR>X4025V64RE460XXXXX</ZUONR>
<SGTXT>REX</SGTXT>
<BEWAR />
<ZFPOS />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</POSITIONSSATZ>
- <POSITIONSSATZ>
<ZSATA>4</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>009</BUZEI>
<KOART>S</KOART>
<SHKZG>S</SHKZG>
<NEWKO>20519109</NEWKO>
<GSBER>17AB</GSBER>
<ZUBUK />
<VBUND />
<WRBTR>0000000000000</WRBTR>
<ZBTR1>0000000021070</ZBTR1>
<ZBTR2>0000000000000</ZBTR2>
<ZSTEU />
<VALUT>20080904</VALUT>
<KOSTL />
<AUFNR />
<ZUONR>X4025V64RE460XXXXX</ZUONR>
<SGTXT>REX</SGTXT>
<BEWAR />
<ZFPOS />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</POSITIONSSATZ>
- <POSITIONSSATZ>
<ZSATA>4</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>010</BUZEI>
<KOART>S</KOART>
<SHKZG>S</SHKZG>
<NEWKO>20519109</NEWKO>
<GSBER>17AA</GSBER>
<ZUBUK />
<VBUND />
<WRBTR>0000000000000</WRBTR>
<ZBTR1>0000000009796</ZBTR1>
<ZBTR2>0000000000000</ZBTR2>
<ZSTEU />
<VALUT>20080904</VALUT>
<KOSTL />
<AUFNR />
<ZUONR>X4027V63RE460XXXXX</ZUONR>
<SGTXT>REX</SGTXT>
<BEWAR />
<ZFPOS />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</POSITIONSSATZ>
- <NACHSATZ>
<ZSATA>9</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>010</BUZEI>
<ERDAT>20080905</ERDAT>
<UZEIT>000549</UZEIT>
<ZPROG>PGRR3010</ZPROG>
<ZZSOL>000000000359502</ZZSOL>
<ZZHAB>000000000359502</ZZHAB>
<ZZBEL>0000001</ZZBEL>
<ZZPOS>000000010</ZZPOS>
<ZFILN />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</NACHSATZ>
- <VORSATZ>
<ZSATA>0</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>000</BUZEI>
<ERDAT>20080905</ERDAT>
<UZEIT>000549</UZEIT>
<ZPROG>PGRR3010</ZPROG>
<ZLIEF>T</ZLIEF>
<START>20080905</START>
<ZFILL />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</VORSATZ>
- <KOPFSATZ>
<ZSATA>1</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>000</BUZEI>
<BUDAT>20080904</BUDAT>
<BLDAT>20080904</BLDAT>
<XBLNR />
<WAERS />
<HWAE2>EUR</HWAE2>
<HWAE3 />
<KURS2>000000000</KURS2>
<KURS3>000000000</KURS3>
<BKTXT />
<ZFILK />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</KOPFSATZ>
- <POSITIONSSATZ>
<ZSATA>4</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>001</BUZEI>
<KOART>S</KOART>
<SHKZG>S</SHKZG>
<NEWKO>30611102</NEWKO>
<GSBER>17AB</GSBER>
<ZUBUK />
<VBUND />
<WRBTR>0000000000000</WRBTR>
<ZBTR1>0000000057576</ZBTR1>
<ZBTR2>0000000000000</ZBTR2>
<ZSTEU />
<VALUT>20080904</VALUT>
<KOSTL />
<AUFNR />
<ZUONR>X4025V64RE460XXXXX</ZUONR>
<SGTXT>REX</SGTXT>
<BEWAR />
<ZFPOS />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</POSITIONSSATZ>
- <POSITIONSSATZ>
<ZSATA>4</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>009</BUZEI>
<KOART>S</KOART>
<SHKZG>S</SHKZG>
<NEWKO>20519109</NEWKO>
<GSBER>17AB</GSBER>
<ZUBUK />
<VBUND />
<WRBTR>0000000000000</WRBTR>
<ZBTR1>0000000021070</ZBTR1>
<ZBTR2>0000000000000</ZBTR2>
<ZSTEU />
<VALUT>20080904</VALUT>
<KOSTL />
<AUFNR />
<ZUONR>X4025V64RE460XXXXX</ZUONR>
<SGTXT>REX</SGTXT>
<BEWAR />
<ZFPOS />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</POSITIONSSATZ>
- <POSITIONSSATZ>
<ZSATA>4</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>010</BUZEI>
<KOART>S</KOART>
<SHKZG>S</SHKZG>
<NEWKO>20519109</NEWKO>
<GSBER>17AA</GSBER>
<ZUBUK />
<VBUND />
<WRBTR>0000000000000</WRBTR>
<ZBTR1>0000000009796</ZBTR1>
<ZBTR2>0000000000000</ZBTR2>
<ZSTEU />
<VALUT>20080904</VALUT>
<KOSTL />
<AUFNR />
<ZUONR>X4027V63RE460XXXXX</ZUONR>
<SGTXT>REX</SGTXT>
<BEWAR />
<ZFPOS />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</POSITIONSSATZ>
- <NACHSATZ>
<ZSATA>9</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>010</BUZEI>
<ERDAT>20080905</ERDAT>
<UZEIT>000549</UZEIT>
<ZPROG>PGRR3010</ZPROG>
<ZZSOL>000000000359502</ZZSOL>
<ZZHAB>000000000359502</ZZHAB>
<ZZBEL>0000001</ZZBEL>
<ZZPOS>000000010</ZZPOS>
<ZFILN />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</NACHSATZ>
</ns:MT_MULTI_TYPES>
And here the outbound payload:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns0:MT_MULTI_TYPES xmlns:ns0="namespace">
- <VORSATZ>
<ZSATA>0</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>000</BUZEI>
<ERDAT>20080905</ERDAT>
<UZEIT>000549</UZEIT>
<ZPROG>PGRR3010</ZPROG>
<ZLIEF>T</ZLIEF>
<START>20080905</START>
<ZFILL />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</VORSATZ>
- <VORSATZ>
<ZSATA>0</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>000</BUZEI>
<ERDAT>20080905</ERDAT>
<UZEIT>000549</UZEIT>
<ZPROG>PGRR3010</ZPROG>
<ZLIEF>T</ZLIEF>
<START>20080905</START>
<ZFILL />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</VORSATZ>
- <KOPFSATZ>
<ZSATA>1</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>000</BUZEI>
<BUDAT>20080904</BUDAT>
<BLDAT>20080904</BLDAT>
<XBLNR />
<WAERS />
<HWAE2>EUR</HWAE2>
<HWAE3 />
<KURS2>000000000</KURS2>
<KURS3>000000000</KURS3>
<BKTXT />
<ZFILK />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</KOPFSATZ>
- <KOPFSATZ>
<ZSATA>1</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>000</BUZEI>
<BUDAT>20080904</BUDAT>
<BLDAT>20080904</BLDAT>
<XBLNR />
<WAERS />
<HWAE2>EUR</HWAE2>
<HWAE3 />
<KURS2>000000000</KURS2>
<KURS3>000000000</KURS3>
<BKTXT />
<ZFILK />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</KOPFSATZ>
- <POSITIONSSATZ>
<ZSATA>4</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>001</BUZEI>
<KOART>S</KOART>
<SHKZG>S</SHKZG>
<NEWKO>30611102</NEWKO>
<GSBER>17AB</GSBER>
<ZUBUK />
<VBUND />
<WRBTR>0000000000000</WRBTR>
<ZBTR1>0000000057576</ZBTR1>
<ZBTR2>0000000000000</ZBTR2>
<ZSTEU />
<VALUT>20080904</VALUT>
<KOSTL />
<AUFNR />
<ZUONR>X4025V64RE460XXXXX</ZUONR>
<SGTXT>REX</SGTXT>
<BEWAR />
<ZFPOS />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</POSITIONSSATZ>
- <POSITIONSSATZ>
<ZSATA>4</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>009</BUZEI>
<KOART>S</KOART>
<SHKZG>S</SHKZG>
<NEWKO>20519109</NEWKO>
<GSBER>17AB</GSBER>
<ZUBUK />
<VBUND />
<WRBTR>0000000000000</WRBTR>
<ZBTR1>0000000021070</ZBTR1>
<ZBTR2>0000000000000</ZBTR2>
<ZSTEU />
<VALUT>20080904</VALUT>
<KOSTL />
<AUFNR />
<ZUONR>X4025V64RE460XXXXX</ZUONR>
<SGTXT>REX</SGTXT>
<BEWAR />
<ZFPOS />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</POSITIONSSATZ>
- <POSITIONSSATZ>
<ZSATA>4</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>010</BUZEI>
<KOART>S</KOART>
<SHKZG>S</SHKZG>
<NEWKO>20519109</NEWKO>
<GSBER>17AA</GSBER>
<ZUBUK />
<VBUND />
<WRBTR>0000000000000</WRBTR>
<ZBTR1>0000000009796</ZBTR1>
<ZBTR2>0000000000000</ZBTR2>
<ZSTEU />
<VALUT>20080904</VALUT>
<KOSTL />
<AUFNR />
<ZUONR>X4027V63RE460XXXXX</ZUONR>
<SGTXT>REX</SGTXT>
<BEWAR />
<ZFPOS />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</POSITIONSSATZ>
- <POSITIONSSATZ>
<ZSATA>4</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>001</BUZEI>
<KOART>S</KOART>
<SHKZG>S</SHKZG>
<NEWKO>30611102</NEWKO>
<GSBER>17AB</GSBER>
<ZUBUK />
<VBUND />
<WRBTR>0000000000000</WRBTR>
<ZBTR1>0000000057576</ZBTR1>
<ZBTR2>0000000000000</ZBTR2>
<ZSTEU />
<VALUT>20080904</VALUT>
<KOSTL />
<AUFNR />
<ZUONR>X4025V64RE460XXXXX</ZUONR>
<SGTXT>REX</SGTXT>
<BEWAR />
<ZFPOS />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</POSITIONSSATZ>
- <POSITIONSSATZ>
<ZSATA>4</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>009</BUZEI>
<KOART>S</KOART>
<SHKZG>S</SHKZG>
<NEWKO>20519109</NEWKO>
<GSBER>17AB</GSBER>
<ZUBUK />
<VBUND />
<WRBTR>0000000000000</WRBTR>
<ZBTR1>0000000021070</ZBTR1>
<ZBTR2>0000000000000</ZBTR2>
<ZSTEU />
<VALUT>20080904</VALUT>
<KOSTL />
<AUFNR />
<ZUONR>X4025V64RE460XXXXX</ZUONR>
<SGTXT>REX</SGTXT>
<BEWAR />
<ZFPOS />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</POSITIONSSATZ>
- <POSITIONSSATZ>
<ZSATA>4</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>010</BUZEI>
<KOART>S</KOART>
<SHKZG>S</SHKZG>
<NEWKO>20519109</NEWKO>
<GSBER>17AA</GSBER>
<ZUBUK />
<VBUND />
<WRBTR>0000000000000</WRBTR>
<ZBTR1>0000000009796</ZBTR1>
<ZBTR2>0000000000000</ZBTR2>
<ZSTEU />
<VALUT>20080904</VALUT>
<KOSTL />
<AUFNR />
<ZUONR>X4027V63RE460XXXXX</ZUONR>
<SGTXT>REX</SGTXT>
<BEWAR />
<ZFPOS />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</POSITIONSSATZ>
- <NACHSATZ>
<ZSATA>9</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>010</BUZEI>
<ERDAT>20080905</ERDAT>
<UZEIT>000549</UZEIT>
<ZPROG>PGRR3010</ZPROG>
<ZZSOL>000000000359502</ZZSOL>
<ZZHAB>000000000359502</ZZHAB>
<ZZBEL>0000001</ZZBEL>
<ZZPOS>000000010</ZZPOS>
<ZFILN />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</NACHSATZ>
- <NACHSATZ>
<ZSATA>9</ZSATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<BUKRS>0560</BUKRS>
<BLART>8F</BLART>
<BELNR>1816008128</BELNR>
<BUZEI>010</BUZEI>
<ERDAT>20080905</ERDAT>
<UZEIT>000549</UZEIT>
<ZPROG>PGRR3010</ZPROG>
<ZZSOL>000000000359502</ZZSOL>
<ZZHAB>000000000359502</ZZHAB>
<ZZBEL>0000001</ZZBEL>
<ZZPOS>000000010</ZZPOS>
<ZFILN />
<ZENDE>E</ZENDE>
</NACHSATZ>
</ns0:MT_MULTI_TYPES>

Print in different page for different material type in Sapscript

Hi all
How do I do the above matter?
Currently I have a script that print all material according to some condition.
My client request to have a different page of material list for different material type.
Please advise
az

Hi,
1) Sort the internal table by material type.
call func 'OPEN_FORM'.
loop at itab.
at new mattype.
if mattype = 'A'.
call fun 'START_FORM'.
   exporting
    page   =    'PAGEA'.
elseif mattype = 'B'.
call fun 'START_FORM'.
   exporting
    page   =    'PAGEB'.
endat.
call func 'WRITE_FORM'.
AT end of mattype.
call function 'END_FORM'.
endat.
endloop.
call function 'CLOSE_FORM'.
Thanks,
Nethaji.

Use of different material types

Hi Experts ,
My client is thinking of expansion of its plant . This new plant would be copy of their already existing plant at another location . Now some of materials for manufacturing finish materials are same in both plants but they both use different material types . That is here there is only one mat type where there they use 4 mat types .
Now do I need to create new plant here or I can use the same existing plant for creation of new materials ? If I want to use the same plant then would be the effect on valuation of mat. Can these mat with different mat types be transported successfully ?

Hi Neal,
So you did enjoy your weekend!!! Good good; well you go to IMG ( SPRO ) and on to ENTERPRISE STRUCTURE >> ASSIGNMENT >> LOGISTICS EXECUTION; and just in case you miss out the warehouse number, ENTERPRISE STRUCTURE >> DEFINITION >> LOGISTICS EXECUTION . You will find the links there. Unfortunately I created a screenshot for you but I just do not know how to attach it.
The list I was talking about was MRP List or Stock overview list ( MD05 / MD04 ). There are two more transactions that I think might come in handy. Check them out:
LS26 - stock overview of warehouse.
LL01 - warehouse activity monitor.
Since the plant and warehouse will be linked, I guess there would be no discrimination on checking stock but I am pretty sure system checks warehouse stock first. That is the entire procedure. I hope it helps. Do reward points if I was able to answer your query.
Regards,
Sreekant.

Vendor Payment with different document types

Dear Sapguru,
We have a scenario where a particular vendor payable is in two different document types for example, RE and KZ.
When we execute TC F110, the payment proposal is grouping the payments by document type. I.e. it grouped all the documents under type RE and grouped all the documents under type KZ and created two line items in the payment proposal.
Actually, we want to have a single group consisting of all the document types payable to the vendor.
We have checked different SAP notes and also verified out system settings, but the problem still remains.
Can somebody let us know how to group all the open items in a single line item in F110 irrespective of document types.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards.,
Rama

Dear Naravi,
the main factor which affects the grouping of items is the Structure ZHLG1:
ZBUKR
ABSBU
LIFNR
KUNNR
EMPFG
WAERS
ZLSCH
HBKID
HKTID
BVTYP
SRTGB
SRTBP
XINVE
PAYGR
UZAWE
DTWS1
DTWS2
DTWS3
DTWS4
KIDNO
All these fields have to coincide, to have a single payment.
Please check why two documents with different document type are paid into two different payments.
Read the SAP notes 109233 and 164835 and 305414 as well.
I hope this helps.
Mauri

What is the best way to produce different report types out of the same SSRS Report

So I have a request to produce different report types based on a "Line Of Business" Parameter that is provided. I know that SSRS sometimes struggles with gathering the Metadata based on IF Statements.
What is the best way to provide multiple different report types with different data based on the "Line Of Business" Parameter that is provided? Can I simply do this via the SQL Stored Procedure? And how so that the Metadata is collected correctly?
Just don't know what the generally accepted business principle is on this and how to go about doing it.
Thanks in advance for your review and am hopeful for a reply.

Hi ITBobbyP,
Per my understanding that you have create an parameter (Line Of Businiess) to get diffetent types of report, I would like to confirm with you want do you mean about the different report types?
Is that mean you have table and one column named Report type, you want to filtered on this column? Or the report type you mean is like Parameterized reports,Linked reports,Snapshot reports,Subreports and so on.
If want you want is through the selection of the parameter to change the report type(Parameterized reports,Linked reports,Snapshot reports,Subreports ..),currently it is impossible to acheive this.
If you still have any problem, please try to provide more details information about your reqirements, the sampe data in the table, the report structure you have designed and so on.
Any problem, please feel free to ask.
Regards,
Vicky Liu
Vicky Liu
TechNet Community Support

How to add different data types in Linked list?

The basic idea is that I want to implement a linked list like the one which we generally implement in C. I need to store different data types in a single node. Is it possible to implement like this or I have to implement a linked list for each different data type?

I have an application program in which there is a form. In this form there are different text fields in which data is to be inserted by the user. These data's will be inserted into the database. I want to hit the database only once. So I need to store these data in a data structure before I insert into the database. I think it will be easy for me to handle the data in a linked list if I can have different data types in a single node.
Moreover, I think u're not getting my question. This pic will help u.
http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/4500/sampler.jpg
I'm not sure about that the code which u have written will have different data types in single node. I have to try that.
And of course if anyone has any better idea than me, it will be very helpful.

How to convert an xml to another Xml with a different structure...

hi
i have an xml which should be converted to a standard xml with an entirely different structure(Different elements)....can this be done with xml,xsl alone or do we need to write an java class along with them...if there are any examples..it would be of great help...plz help me out....as this is a work stopper...
given below is the kind i have
<hotelinfo>
<hotelname>RADISSON HOTEL CHENNAI </hotelname>
<address>355 C Gst Road St Thomas Mount Chennai1 600016IN</address>     <price>90.00 - 150.00</price>
<distance>2 (W)</distance>
</hotelinfo>
i need to convert it into
<propertyName>RADISSON HOTEL CHENNAI </propertyName>
<address>
<addressLine>355 C Gst Road St Thomas Mount</addressLine>
<CityName>Chennai</CityName>
<PostalCode>600 001</PostalCode>
<StateName>TamilNadu</StateName>
<CountryName>India</CountryName>
</address>
thanks in advance

Ok here is the code...
package mypack;
import java.io.File;
import javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder;
import javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory;
import javax.xml.transform.Result;
import javax.xml.transform.Source;
import javax.xml.transform.Transformer;
import javax.xml.transform.TransformerConfigurationException;
import javax.xml.transform.TransformerException;
import javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory;
import javax.xml.transform.dom.DOMSource;
import javax.xml.transform.stream.StreamResult;
import org.w3c.dom.Document;
import org.w3c.dom.Node;
* @author SM23772
* TODO To change the template for this generated type comment go to
* Window - Preferences - Java - Code Style - Code Templates
public class Roopa {
     public static void main(String[] args) {
          File docFile = new File("Roopa.xml");
          Document doc = null;
          Document newDoc = null;
          String hname = null, task = null;
          try {
               DocumentBuilderFactory dbf = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
               DocumentBuilder db = dbf.newDocumentBuilder();
               doc = db.parse(docFile); //parsing Roopa.xml
               newDoc = db.newDocument(); //Created New document Object for new xml
               hname = doc.getElementsByTagName("hotelname").item(0)
                         .getFirstChild().getNodeValue();
               task = doc.getElementsByTagName("task").item(0).getFirstChild()
                         .getNodeValue();
               Node rootNode = newDoc.createElement("property-info"); //creating root node;
               Node pp = newDoc.createElement("name"); //creating a node called name
               Node taskNode = newDoc.createElement("task"); //creating a node called task
               pp.appendChild(newDoc.createTextNode(hname)); //appending a text node inisde name
               taskNode.appendChild(newDoc.createTextNode(task)); //appending the text node inside task
               rootNode.appendChild(pp); //asppending the nodes inside the root node
               rootNode.appendChild(taskNode);
               newDoc.appendChild(rootNode); //appending the root node to the document
               writeXmlFile(newDoc, "Dest.xml"); //function called to write the document to Dest.xml
          } catch (Exception e) {
               System.out.println(e);
     public static void writeXmlFile(Document doc, String filename) {
          try {
               // Prepare the DOM document for writing
               Source source = new DOMSource(doc);
               // Prepare the output file
               File file = new File(filename);
               Result result = new StreamResult(file);
               // Write the DOM document to the file
               Transformer xformer = TransformerFactory.newInstance()
                         .newTransformer();
               xformer.transform(source, result);
          } catch (TransformerConfigurationException e) {
          } catch (TransformerException e) {
The xml files:
roopa.xml:
<hotel>
<hotelname>RADISSON HOTEL CHENNAI</hotelname>
<more-info><task>give treate to shanu</task></more-info>
</hotel>
Dest.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<property-info><name>RADISSON HOTEL CHENNAI</name><task>give treate to shanu</task></property-info>Please go through the code.. if u have any more concerns do let me know................
cheers
Shanu

Comparing Data between two tables with different structure

Hi,
I have 2 tables T1 and T2. Both tables have different structure. I have to check for rows missing in T1 which exist in T2 and vice-versa. I can do that using MINUS operator. But the part where the data exists in both T1 and T2, I have to compare some columns (9 columns the names of this column coming from a meta-data table) if they have same values. If not an exception has to be generated.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks

Hi,
Whenever you need help on this forum, post:
(1) The version of Oracle (and any other relevant software) you're using
(2) A little sample data (just enough to show what the problem is) from all the relevant tables
(3) The results you want from that data (4) Your best attempt so far
Executable SQL statements (like "CREATE TABLE AS ..." or "INSERT ..." statements) are best for (2).
Formatted tabular output is okay for (3). Type before and after the tabular text, to preserve spacing.
What do you mean by "an exception has to be generated"?
Do you want to raise an error?
Do you want something to appear in the result set?
MINUS finds rows that are in one result set, but not in another.
INTERSECT finds rows that are in both result sets.
Column names have to be hard-coded into the SQL statement. If you want to write something now that will get column names from a metadata table sometime in the future, then you have to use dynamic SQL. SQL*Plus sometimes has quick and dirty ways of doing dynamic SQL, so say whether you're using SQL*Plus or not.

Putaway Strategy P - Managing different SU types

Hi gurus,
I'm experiencing the following problem.
Using the putaway strategy Pallet, the system processes different storage unit types and allocates them to the appropriate section, but only the same storage unit types can be placed into a storage bin at one time.
My need is to place at the same time different SU types into a storage bin. Is it possible?
Thank for your help!
Francesca

Hi
The storage unit is compatible with the current block when the 'maximum
storage units' which can be stored in the bin are the same. The
'maximum storage units' depends on the storage unit type of the first
storage unit you put it the bin. If the values of T337B-MAXLE are
different then the system will not allow the placement. This is the
is the standard behaviour.
Field LAGP-MAXLE indicates the maximum number of Storage Units that are
allowed to be placed into a bin and this is set during the first
placement into an empty bin in accordance with the block stucture
definition in transaction OMM4.
This does not mean that it is not possible to place different Storage
Unit Types in to the bin. This is possible but only when the block
structure definition in OMM4 has an identical value for the maximum
number of storage units in the block (T337B-MAXLE). If one has a value
of 20 and the other has a value of 10 then the system correctly issues
error L3 425.
regards,
Ramana

Split balance sheet report by different business types

Hi Expert,
Recently, one of my entity with new business type required to setup and target live by May-2011. Currently, we are using profit center accounting for P&L report. With the new business type, they would like to split the balance sheet report by that.
Can expert please share with me how can I achieve to split the balance sheet by different business types? Your kind help is appreciated.
Regards,
Kang Ring

Dear:
For business area definition you have to do certain customization in SPRO In enterprise structure....definition for Financial Accounting... define business area and for enabling Business area wise balance sheets to ****(Financial Accounting Global Standard) in SPRO...Enter Global Parameters.... and enable Business area balance sheet.
Regards
Edited by: Atif Farooq on Mar 4, 2011 10:53 AM

Performance between two partitionned tables with different structure

Hi,
I would like if there is a difference between two partitionned tables with different structure in term of performance (access, query, insertions, updates ).
I explain myself in detail :
I have a table that stores one value every 10 minutes in a day (so we have 144 values (24*6) in the whole day), with the corresponding id.
Here is the structure :
| Table T1 |
+ id PK |
+ date PK |
+ sample1 |
+ sample2 |
+ ... |
+ sample144 |
The table is partionned on the column date, with a partionned every months. The primary key is based on the columns (id, date).
There is an additionnal index on the column (id) (is it useful ?).
I would like to know if it is better to have a table with just (id, date, value) , so for one row in the first table we'll have 144 rows in the future? table. The partition will already be on the columns (id, date) with the index associated.
What are the gains or loss in performance with this new structure ( access, DMLs , storage ) ?
I discuss with the Java developers and they say it is simpler to manage in their code.
Oracle version : Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
Thanks & Regards
From France
Oliver
Edited by: 998239 on 5 avr. 2013 01:59

I mean storage in tablespaces and datafiles on disk.
Can you justify please and give me concrete arguments why the two structures are equivalent ( except inserting data in T(id, date,value))
because i have to make a report.i didnt say any thing like
two structures are equivalent ( except inserting data in T(id, date,value)i said
About structure : TABLE1(id, date, value) is better than TABLE1(id, date, sample1, .... sample144)because
1) oracle has restriction for numbers of column. Ok you can have 144 columns now but for future if you must have more than 1000 columns , what will you do?
2) Restrictions on Table Compression (Table compression is not supported for tables with more than 255 columns.)
3) store same type values on diffrent columns is bad practise
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/schema.htm#i4383
i remember i seen Toms article about this but now i cant find it sorry ((( if i found i will post here

IDOC - IDOC scenario with different message types

Dear Experts
I will like to have your expert opinion in the following question:
I have an IDOC -> IDOC scenario. Wherein at the destination system I have a message type which does not exist at the source system.
Also the IDOC type at destination system does not exist at the source system.
Let say, I will be creating custom message type at source system (Z****) and will also be creating the custom IDOC type (z****) with the same structure, definition as the destination.
Now my question is, even if there will be different message types and different IDOC types but with the same structure (the segment level definition
and field attribute remains the same at both the system). The difference lies with the names. And I have proper mapping though process code.
Will I be able to receive the IDOC correctly at destination?
Thanks & Best Regards

Hi All
I figured out the answer myself now.
You got to have same name for message type. All of you said this and this is rite.
Coming to IDOC type, I did not really got clear idea on this from this discussion.
But after working on a scenario, I learnt that, you can have different names for IDOCs, but provided that, whichever IDOC type the source system is sending, the same type must exist in your destination as well. Otherwise, system wont process your IDOC. But from mapping point of view, its upto individual how do thay handle mapping inside inbound process code for different idoc types / strucutes.
Lesson learnt by me, ideally try to keep same name for both logical message and idoc type at both source and destination. If possible try to keep the structure level also the same. This is my view, learnt it the hard way.
Cheers
Shane

Different structure types in itab

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for