Discrepancies between following error readings in NI-MAX

We are currently investigating the source of following errors in our systems. Maybe there is something wrong with our setup. We are using stepper motors with third party drivers and incremental encoders. We are using our own test program which performs random movements and then displays the actual position reached, plus the following error, and stops if a certain following error value is exceeded after finishing the motion.
The values read by our program and by the "advanced" data of the 1-axis interactive menu of NI-MAX are identical. However, if we watch the graph of the following error in the "misc plots" section, during the movement it shows values at least similar to those shown in the "advanced" display. When exceptional high following errors are detected by our program after finishing a cycle, our program shows following error values still identical to those in the "advanced" menu. When we switch to the "misc plots" section, however, at the end of the plot the following error is much lower (and well inside our limits).
Where does the plot display get its data from? Does it read the register with the following error data at the same time as the routine displaying this value in the "advanced" menu? The values shown by the plots at the end of a cycle are always OK and now we have some problems which value to believe ...

Turns out I was using too fast a speed. I slowed it down and all was well.

Similar Messages

What are the possible causes of following errors in MAX? Are there any references on how to use MAX?

Hi, it's me again.
I've checked the encoder response in MAX (-ve ccw, +ve cw) and it seems fine. But when the motor moves MAX will generate a following error message. Is my encoder causing the problem or have I made a mistake in the settings? I've checked the connections to the encoder and they are all correctly wired.Could there be other causes of following errors?
The motor does stop earlier when I reduced the following error value, so I'm assuming that the motor stops only when it has reached the set number of following errors and NOT because the motor has reached the target position. Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.

It may be that the 7344 is missing encoder values, or that the motor isn't tuned correctly. The first thing I'd like for you to check is that the Encoder Counts per Revolution input to the Axis Settings menu in MAX is set correctly (I believe it defaults to 2000 counts). To check this, you can rotate the motor by hand one revolution to see how many counts have accumulated. Most encoders are either 2000 counts per rev or 4000 counts per rev.
Once you have that confirmed, autotune the motors and make sure the values for Kp, Kd, and Ki are resonable. (Kd is often around 10x Kp) Once these are set, start your motors moving slowly and observe the following error. This can be seen under the Advanced tab of the 1D Interactive menu. If it is slowly incrementing, t
hen your're missing counts. If it is negative, then the encoder phases may be backward. If there is no following error, or the count stays constant, then try increasing the speed. It could just be that your encoder sends pulses too fast for the 7344 to read.
Let me know how it goes.
Kyle V

Receiveing a "Following Error" when clicking HALT on MAX, motor does not energize

I recently encountered this strange situation. When turning the following error on (value other than 0, say 200, etc), and I move a motor until it encounters this following error, its axis will be killed by default.
That poses a problem since an un-energized motor in my situation may cause some damage (it may drop down some parts on our fixture). I need to keep the motor energized after a following error.
I've tried using the STOP vi after any following error occurs, but I've noticed it may take 3 or 4 iterations of STOP to re-energize the motor.
Better yet, in MAX, if I constantly move the motor shaft by hand, back and forth, and try clicking "HALT", I will continuously see the "Following Error" light turn on, and the motor never energizes. It is constantly killed, even though I'm clicking on HALT.
Any advice would be appreciated.

Hey, wanted to get back to you on something I'd mentioned earlier regarding the halt command. I'd stated that the only way to get past the killed state of the motors was to reinitialize the controllers. This isn't correct and I'm sorry for any misunderstanding on that. I had failed to clarify that the halt command will indeed reenergize the motors.
The halt basically will, first, move the set point or target destination to the current position of the motor and, second, reenergize the coils (because they'd been previously de-energized by the inhibit line going active due to your having exceeded the maximum following error). So, in the situation where you're continually moving the shaft of the motor and pressing halt on the controller, the command is resetting the set point to the current position of the motor. But because of your continual motion, the motor has moved more than your maximum following error by the time the coils are energized. The controller then finds itself in a state of having exceeded the maximum following error and the inhibits are fired again, hence the unresponsive nature of the halt.
In considering your situation and bouncing some ideas past R&D, we think that your best solution is to implement some sort of a brake on your axis. The whole idea behind monitoring the following error is for safety purposes. With a brake you'll be able to continue monitoring the following error and see the exact behavior you desire. What you'd need to do is wire the inhibit line to the brake such that when the following error trips the motor and the inhibits are fired, they will activate the brake and you'll hold position. You can then call halt to reenergize the coils and the brake will release at the same time.
Another way you could accomplish this would be to use an axis or stage with more friction. If the friction were sufficient to hold the load of the stage, then when the motors are de-energized when exceeding the following error, the slippage would be none to minimal.
The brake seems to be the best approach for you. I hope this is helpful to you and again apologize for being unclear on the halt command's characteristics in my previous post. Please let me know if you have any further questions and we'll get you the help you need.
Best of luck,
Jim Laudie
Applications Engineer, National Instruments

My iCloud is not syncing between my mac and my iPhone and shows the following error message CoreDAVHTTPStatusErrorDomain error 501. what does this mean?!

I have recently upgraded to an iphone 5S 4G and also updated my mac with the latest software so that i can use the icloud to back up all my stuff. It doesn't seem to be working with my contacts at all and recently added ones are disappearing, old ones are duplicating etc. The contacts icloud has the following error message CoreDAVHTTPStatusErrorDomain error 501. and I have no idea what it means. Can anyone help?

I had this problem before. I like to disable extra services to speed up my computer and I disabled the Apple Mobile Device service and had to re-enable this.
You can do that by going Control Panel>Administrative Tools>Services. Once you have gone to the services window, look for Apple Mobile Device and right-click. Select "Properties". There should be some information about the service as well as the label "Startup Type" with a drop-down menu beside it. If it says "disabled", that is your problem; Change the selection to anything except disabled (Automatic is easier and ensures that you can sync as soon as itunes opens).
If this doesn't work, I would look into your anti-virus' settings. Good Luck!

Following error/mechanical axial clearance- solution: static friction compenastion?

Hello,
Firstly I would like to write something about the motion system which I use:
-PXI 7344;
-UMI 7764;
-NI-Motion 6.0 (May 2003 Edition).
-One of the stepper motor which I use has 1600 counts per revolution and it is connected with encoder which has 4000 counts per revolutions (these are settings which were set up in MAX). Between them is worm gear (gear ratio: 1/360). The encoder was fixed on axis of rotation of long arm and the motor was fixed on the other side of worm gear.
Few days ago, I recorded data which describes current position of the arm (from encoder) and following error. And there is tiny problem which worry me a little bit: sometimes the value of following error is higher during the motion than in other iteration of movement. To describe this effect better I attached fragments of files at the end of this post (first columns describes current position and second column describes current value of following error). Move constraints in these two cases are the same: velocity 200 rpm, acceleration and deceleration 3 rps/s.
I think that the reason for that type of situation is that there is a little mechanical axial clearance. In my opinion the solution for this should be use a static friction compensation (in axis settings->filter settings->enable static friction compensation, am I right? If so might you help me to set the proper values?
With regards
Peter
1st file’s fragment (values of following error are acceptable)
0 0
0 1
1 1
3 4
7 7
26 9
53 10
97 11
133 15
185 16
251 12
325 8
413 10
498 9
586 10
663 18
777 7
925 10
1049 7
2nd file’s fragment (values of following error are not so good as they should be )
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 8
0 13
0 17
0 20
0 26
0 34
0 38
0 45
0 56
0 65
10 68
17 76
26 82
52 81
Many thanks

Hello,
It looks as though your system is experiencing an increasing following error until enough torque is provided to overcome inertia, so using static friction compensation may help your system. The deadzone values determine when the DAC output is enabled. The maximum deadzone position determines the error which must accumulate before the DAC begins generating a signal to reduce the error. The DAC remains active until the error is reduced to the minimum deadzone position or less. At that point, the DAC deactivates again. This is useful in determining a minimum following error before motion begins when starting a move and it also stops the motion when the difference between the current position and the target position is less than the minimum deadzone position value. This prevents your motor from slowly grinding against the static friction, which could result in damage to the motor or overheating.
The offset voltage is a voltage boost that is added to the torque of the system and is used to overcome the inertia of the axis. I would suggest starting with the default values for the deadzone position values (5 and 10) and try a small offset voltage value (i.e. 0.1 V). From there, you can modify the offset incrementally until you achieve a system that does not experience the following errors that you listed.
Try those steps and let me know if you have any additional questions on this issue.
Regards,
Scott R.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Following error

Hi,
I have a perculiar error.
Im using a UMI-7774 and a PCI-7344 motion controller with a Compax C3 servo drive. the drive feeds back a simulated encoder signal (digital RS422 5V level differential).
I have a problem with the Axis 1 on the UMI. The encoder feedback does not update in the 1-D interactive on MAX. On the 3 other axes the feedback works fine with the same drive and motor setup. The settings for all four axes are identical. On axis 1 I keep getting a following error. The problem is the feedback does not update the position.
The only noticible difference between Axis 1 and the other three is the PWM settings option. I have disabled this option.
Any suggestions as to why Im not getting feedback on Axis-1?

As the other axes work fine this could be either a problem with the drive (encoder emulation), the 7344 or the UMI.
Here are some things to check:
Have you monitored the emulated encoder signals with an oscilloscope? Are they ok?
Please wire one of the working axes to the connector of axis one and the one that is not working to another axis on the UMI. Does the error stick with the motor/drive or with the axis on the UMI? This should tell you where to look for the error.
If the error sticks with the motor/drive please check the settings, cabling and so on. If it sticks with the axis of the 7344/7774 please double check your MAX settings first. If you really can't find a significant difference (e. g. disabled axis, wrong feedback type,...) there is a chance that either the 7344, the 7774 or the cable are defective. In this case please contact your local NI branch for an RMA.
Best regards,
Jochen Klier
National Instruments Germany

In a motion Control System, What is a following error?

I am trying to understand what a "Following Error" is. I get the error number 70150 which is called a following error. When trying to execute the find home VI in the NI library

The following error only occurs in closed loop systems. It is simply the difference, in counts, between the commanded trajectory position and the actual feedback position. A good way to characterize your following error is to go into the Advanced menu of the 1-D Interactive portion of MAX, run your motors at a very low velocty (1 rpm), and watch the Following Error indicator. If it is increasing slow and steady, then you probably have the encoder resolution wrong. If it jumps up in spurts, then the encoder may be damaged. If it is increasing very fast, then either the encdoder isn't plugged in, the encoder isn't working at all, or the encoder is plugged in backwards.
I hope this helps.
Kyle V
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
www.ni.com/ask

WinRM cannot process the request. The following error occured while using Kerberos authentication: The network path was not found.

I have two forests with a transitive on-way trust between them: PROD -> TEST (test trusts PROD). I had previously had kerberos authentication working with winrm from PROD to machines in TEST. I have verified the trust is healthy, I also verified users
in TEST can use WINRM with kerberos just fine. Users from PROD cannot connect via kerberos to machines in TEST with winrm.
I have verified the service has registered the appropriate SPNs. I ran dcdiag against all my PROD and TEST domain controllers and didn't find anything that would prevent kerberos from happening. I even tried disabling the firewall entirely on my TEST dcs
but that didn't gain me anything.
I've enabled kerberos logging but only see the expected errors such as it couldn't find a PROD SPN for the machine, which it shouldn't from what I understand, it should go to the TEST domain and find the SPN from there.
I'm really out of next steps before I call PSS and hope someone here has run into this and could provide me some next steps.
PowerShell Error:
Connecting to remote server failed with the following error message : WinRM cannot process the request. The following error occured while using Kerberos authentication: The network path was not found.
Possible causes are:
-The user name or password specified are invalid.
-Kerberos is used when no authentication method and no user name are specified.
-Kerberos accepts domain user names, but not local user names.
-The Service Principal Name (SPN) for the remote computer name and port does not exist.
-The client and remote computers are in different domains and there is no trust between the two domains.
After checking for the above issues, try the following:
-Check the Event Viewer for events related to authentication.
-Change the authentication method; add the destination computer to the WinRM TrustedHosts configuration setting or use HTTPS transport.
Note that computers in the TrustedHosts list might not be authenticated.
-For more information about WinRM configuration, run the following command: winrm help config. For more information, see the about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic.
+ CategoryInfo : OpenError: (:) [], PSRemotingTransportException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : PSSessionStateBroken
winrs Error:
Winrs error:
WinRM cannot process the request. The following error occured while using Kerberos authentication: The network path was not found.
Possible causes are:
-The user name or password specified are invalid.
-Kerberos is used when no authentication method and no user name are specified.
-Kerberos accepts domain user names, but not local user names.
-The Service Principal Name (SPN) for the remote computer name and port does not exist.
-The client and remote computers are in different domains and there is no trust between the two domains.
After checking for the above issues, try the following:
-Check the Event Viewer for events related to authentication.
-Change the authentication method; add the destination computer to the WinRM TrustedHosts configuration setting or use HTTPS transport.
Note that computers in the TrustedHosts list might not be authenticated.
-For more information about WinRM configuration, run the following command: winrm help config.

Hi Adam,
I'm a little unclear about which SPNs you were looking for, in which case could you confirm you were checking that on the computer object belonging to the actual destination host it has the following SPNs registered?
WSMAN/<NetBIOS name>
WSMAN/<FQDN>
If you were actually trying to use WinRM to connect to the remote forest's domain controllers, then what you said makes sense, but I was caught between assuming this was the case or you meant another member server in that remote forest.
Also, from the client trying to connect to this remote server, are you able to telnet to port 5985? (If you've used something other than the default, try that port)
If you can't, then you've got something else like a firewall (be that the Windows firewall on the destination or a hardware firewall somewhere in between) blocking you at the port level, or the listener on the remote box just isn't working as expected. I
just replied to your other winrm post with steps for checking the latter, so I won't repeat myself here.
If you can telnet to it and the SPNs exist, then you might be up against something called selective authentication which has to do with how the trust was defined. You can have a read of
this to learn a bit more about selective trusts and whether or not it's affecting you.
Cheers,
Lain

SD billing document (transfer between plants) error in document splitting

Dear Gurus.
I have the following scenario.
New GL activated
Zero balance on Profit Center.
SD billing document is created after the shipping of material (internal transfer) between 2 plants belonging to the same company code.
I have several user exits activated and they are not well documented if activated.
Case1.
The billing document is usually created with materials populated with the same Profit Center.
In Tr VF01/VF02 the function: Release for Accounting is executed and no accounting document is created (OK cause they belong to the same company code), this function is just closing the cycle of the billing document to set the status as completed.
Case2.
Billing document containing several materials with more than one Profit Center
During the execution of the function: Release for accounting the following error is gotten: Position 1 is not populated with Profit Center - apparently caused by the splitting rule - financial document creation - the status of the billing document is not set to Completed, is kept as opened.
As I commented In case 1 I do not have any accounting document (no error message)
Doubt 1
Is it possible that the splitting rule is being checked even though no accounting document is created (remember billing in a scenario of material transfer between plants belonging to the same company code)?
Apparently in case 1 I do not have any error cause the splitting rule is deriving the profit center in a passive basis: Inheritance.
In the other way, in case 2 the splitting rule is trying to derive the profit center in an active basis. In my configuration I actually do not have any configuration for the combination of transaction, variant, position to be derived, position basis.
Doubt 2.
Is this the standard behavior of SAP?
Could this be caused by a user exit not identified?
thanks in advance for any advice provided
Regards vpa
Valentin PA.
2.
In case 1 is clear that as only one profit center is shown theoretically the inheritance rule is populating the Profi

It would be possible, I suppose. You could generate Idocs from the SD system (or an interface file) and import that info into the FICA system. Of course the FICA system could not know about the sales order etc - so limited research abilities would exist.
For the second question, that would only function in a single system scenario, and yes the SD document flow would reflect its clearing status in FICA.
regards,
bill.

I am trying to install SAP NetWeaver 7.0 ABAP I got the following error

Hi Sirs,
I am trying to install SAP NetWeaver 7.0 ABAP Trial Version, but I m getting the following error as an pop up i e.,
An unhandled win32 exception occured in sapcontrol.exe [3800]. Just-in-time debugging this exception failed with the following error: No installed debugger has Just-In_Time debugging enebled. In visual studio, just-In-Time debugging can be enabled from tools/Options/Debugging/Just-In-Time.
The log can be found here...
(Jun 23, 2008 10:00:16 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles, err, An error occurred and product installation failed. Look at the log file C:\SAP\NSP\log.txt for details.
(Jun 23, 2008 10:00:16 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles, err, ProductException: (error code = 200; message="Java error"; exception = [java.lang.Exception])
STACK_TRACE: 15
ProductException: (error code = 200; message="Java error"; exception = [java.lang.Exception])
at com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles.execute(StepWrapperInstallFiles.java:254)
at com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles.executeAllSteps(StepWrapperInstallFiles.java:224)
at com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles.executeAllInstallationSteps(StepWrapperInstallFiles.java:177)
at com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles.install(StepWrapperInstallFiles.java:268)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl.installProductAction(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$InstallProduct.getResultForProductAction(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitComponent(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitInstallableComponents(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitProductBeans(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$InstallProduct.install(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$Installer.execute(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.wizard.service.AsynchronousOperation.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
(Jun 24, 2008 11:53:19 AM), Install, com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$InstallProduct, err, An error occurred and product uninstallation failed. Look at the log file C:\SAP\NSP\log.txt for details.
(Jun 24, 2008 11:53:19 AM), Install, com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles, err, ProductException: (error code = 200; message="Java error"; exception = [java.lang.Exception])
STACK_TRACE: 15
ProductException: (error code = 200; message="Java error"; exception = [java.lang.Exception])
at com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles.execute(StepWrapperInstallFiles.java:254)
at com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles.executeAllSteps(StepWrapperInstallFiles.java:224)
at com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles.executeAllUninstallationSteps(StepWrapperInstallFiles.java:192)
at com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles.uninstall(StepWrapperInstallFiles.java:313)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl.uninstallProductAction(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$InstallProduct.processActionsFailed(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitComponent(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitInstallableComponents(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitProductBeans(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$InstallProduct.install(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$Installer.execute(Unknown Source)
at com.installshield.wizard.service.AsynchronousOperation.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Thank you,
Ashok

The SAPINST used to install NW 7.0 needs to read the system environment variable JAVA_HOME in order to determine the proper java binaries to run the install program. To set the JAVA_HOME:
1. Right click my computer > properties
2. Advanced > Environment Variables
3. At the bottom section (system variables), click New.
4. Variable name should be JAVA_HOME the variable value should be the path of the java install (e.g. c:\java).
I have also found that it would be safer to install java to a directory without spaces.
c:\jre_1_4_2 < this is a good directory.
c:\program files\java < this is a bad directory (notice the space between "program files".
As for the just in time debugger, I don't believe tha't relevant. It's just the SAPINST.exe file erroring which is triggering a windows error debugger. But, the root cause of the error is that SAPINST.exe can't find the JDK runtime bits.

Resolve error in Firefox 7.0.1 - executing an auto log-on produces the following error message: XULRunner-Couldn't load XRE function?

Following an upgrade from Firefox 6.0.2 to Firefox 7.0, this error appeared in response to accessing Firefox! Executing an auto log-on produces the following error message: XULRunner-Couldn't load XRE functions.
Also, following an upgrade from V7.0 to V7.0.1, the same error occurs.
Following the In-place Upgrade from Vista Home Premium x64 to Win 7 HP x64, the RoboForm2Go taskbar is no longer on the program display page, rather it is confined to the bottom taskbar. This is likely due to a reported incompatibility between Roboform2Go and Firefox v7.0 (and 7.0.1).
Further, there was a failure of RoboForm2Go Log-ins from the bottom quick-start taskbar.

See [[/questions/880170]]

Always get 'Following error' and 'motor off (axis is killed)'

Hi everyone,
I have the following system:
PCI-7330
UMI-7764
four P7000 series drivers
four Nema 23 stepper motors, each with an encoder
In max, I can operate each moter fine while in open-loop mode, but as soon as I try to operate any of the motors in closed-loop mode I get both the 'following error occured' and 'motor off(axix is killed) errors if I try to move more than 200 steps.
For instance, If I reset position to zero, and set the target to 2000 steps, I get the 'following error' and the motor stops at position 190. However, If I reset to zero, set the target to 200 steps, it will complete with no errors (even though the stopped position says 100 instead of 200).
Can anybody help me figure out what is causing the errors?
- Paul

Paul:
Have you configured your encoders in MAX?
See:
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/29EDB56146F274A386256A1C00624310?opendocument&Submitted&&...
-AK2DM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"It’s the questions that drive us.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Proportional valve and following error problem

Hello, I have a problem with using a NI-7344 card and controlling a proportional valve and hydraulic cylinder.
Everything is working fine in regards to motion and velocity control.
The problem I have is with the following error and halt command. When the cylinder is moving I mechanical disconnect my linear encoder ( 20 pulses/mm) expecting for the following error flag to immediately stop the motion once the value of the following error has been reached. The total stroke is 1016 mm.
What I observe is that the hydraulic cylinder will continue to move for about 20mm when my following error has been set to 50 counts (which should mean 20pulses x 4 / 50 = 1.6mm). I am moving at a rate of 10mm/s
I have also observed that the faster the velocity the smaller the error I see with respect to the cylinder stopping when the encoder is discounted. I am moving at 60mm/s when that happens.
The reason I am discounting the encoder is to try to simulate a partial stuck mechanical system.
Another note is that when ever a "Stop" or "Halt" command is issued in MAX or in our own code the cylinder will stop immediately, so it has nothing to do with the "Kill" command that is issued when a following error has occurred.
Any thoughts on this one?

I think we need to keep in mind that this is a valve that when power is shut off from it, it closes immediately and no motion occurs, not like a motor that could run on a little.
We have issued Kill, Stop, and Halt commands with the same result; the cylinder stops dead in its tracks, no inertia, no nothing. It is only when the encoder stops counting ( because we have mechanical disconnected it from the cylinder, not electrically) will it continue moving for 10- 20 mm after the error flag has been raised.
I'm starting to question the PID loop response. When a PID controller sense's that it's feedback is not keeping up with the demand, isn't it normal for it to increase the output to try to correct the problem. Then my following error kicks in and shuts down the axis? Resulting in a greater error than what was set in the following error parameter. Why this error in motion decreases with a increase velocity, I haven't figured out yet.
Anyway, keep the suggestion coming, someone has an answer to this.
Thanks.

This page contains the following errors:

More and more often I'm getting this message in Safari. I don't recall every getting this message at all until recently and every day it seems to have more and more. What's the issue and is there anything I can do about it?
This page contains the following errors:
error on line 1 at column 1: Extra content at the end of the document

Hi,
www.logitech.com/revolution works fine on my version of Safari (2.0.4 v419.3) so it's not specifically a Safari bug as such.
One quick test you can do to help narrow down things is to try Safari in another user account.This will help us to know whether your problem is local to your account or system wide. If you don't have another account you can use System Preferences -> Accounts -> [+] to create a test one (and [-] to remove it if needed)
For your your internet connections are you using any proxies? (You can check in the System Preferences -> Network pane)
Also, what Safari add-ons have you both added in the past? Maybe we can track it down to a common add-on between you both.

Getting following error when deploying the model in VC

Hi Can any body have idea what is the reason for following error.
Error in compiling Flex application: Error: Branch between 8212 and 41097 around line 0 exceeds 32K span. If possible, please refactor this component.
Error: Branch between 8212 and 41097 around line 0 exceeds 32K span.
Failed to compile AAD10T.mxml
I explain what i haved done in the this model
i have created one view to this model , then i created one RFC to this , it takes some parameters and display the result in table.
Can any body tell me what is the problem
Regards
Vijay

Hi Vishal,
you meet an old friend of all VC developer.
Have a look here:
<a href="https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/VC/32Klimitation">https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/VC/32Klimitation</a>
Best Regards,
Marcel

Discrepancies between following error readings in NI-MAX

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for