Disk Management reporting capacity significantly less than Explorer or Diskpart.exe

Hi, I'm having some odd issues related to Backups failing due to a lack of space on my server, and think there might be something related to the fact that Disk Management is reporting my main partition size as much smaller than it really is. I'm including
an image as it's much easier to explain. Basically, Disk Management shows the partition (which is GPT) as 250mb, but everything else shows it correctly as 1.6TB.
The partitions are left the way the machine shipped from Dell, but I did format it a couple of weeks ago and installed a fresh copy of Windows Server 2012 R2. Sadly I'm not sure if the partitions were like this under Server 2008-- I can't imagine they shows
up like this as I never had any issues so I don't know. Maybe something in the initial install went wrong and tagged the partition incorrectly?)
I've tried to do "extend filesystem" in diskpart to no avail. I'm a bit concerned about touching anything and possibly losing data, unless I have to. That said, this server is in production but currently only as a domain controller and could be
easily demoted and wiped out and started over (with fresh partitions), if I had to. I'd prefer to just figure out a solution to fix this (and hopefully fix the backups in the process since they seem to be running out of space-- as Windows Server Backup only
sees the 250mb size!)
Thanks for any ideas!
Justin

Hi Justin,
1.  Have you tried Rescan Disks in Disk Manager: Click Action, and then click
Rescan Disks.
2.  I also recommend you to make this disk to connect to other operating system to check if the issue is caused by OS or Disk.
3.  Have you set space limit on the disk like Quota management.
4.  Finally, the last method is formatting the disk(please note backup your data before), then reallocate the partition.
Best Regards,
Anna

Similar Messages

  • How to report only quantities less than zero on a calculated field

    I do not understand why my text will not work when it comes to reporting only 'Missing POs' less than zero, I assume it is because I am using 'int' on some fields?
    Any advice?
    SELECT
    t0.father as 'Parent Code',
    t2.itemname as 'Parent Description',
    t2.frgnname as 'Parent Status',
    t0.code as 'Child Code',
    t1.itemname as 'Child Description',
    t1.frgnname as 'Child Status',
    t0.comment as 'Master',
    cast(t3.onhand as int) as 'Child Uncommitted Stock',
    cast(t3.iscommited as int) as 'Child Committed Stock',
    (cast(t3.onhand as int) - cast(t3.iscommited as int)) as 'Child Free Stock',
    cast(t3.onorder as int) as 'Purchase Orders',
    (cast(t3.onhand as int) - cast(t3.iscommited as int)) + cast(t3.onorder as int) as 'Missing POs'
    FROM
    itt1 t0
    inner join oitm t1 on t0.code = t1.itemcode
    inner join oitm t2 on t0.father = t2.itemcode
    LEFT JOIN OITW T3 ON T3.WHSCODE = T0.Warehouse AND T3.ItemCode = T0.Code
    Where T3.WHSCODE Like '[%0]%' and 'Missing POs' < 0
    ORDER BY
    'Missing POs' asc, t0.father, t0.code
    Many thanks,
    Robin (I will be awarding points on all my outstanding questions shorlty - management time pressure at mo!)

    Try this:
    SELECT
    t0.father as 'Parent Code',
    t2.itemname as 'Parent Description',
    t2.frgnname as 'Parent Status',
    t0.code as 'Child Code',
    t1.itemname as 'Child Description',
    t1.frgnname as 'Child Status',
    t0.comment as 'Master',
    cast(t3.onhand as int) as 'Child Uncommitted Stock',
    cast(t3.iscommited as int) as 'Child Committed Stock',
    (cast(t3.onhand as int) - cast(t3.iscommited as int)) as 'Child Free Stock',
    cast(t3.onorder as int) as 'Purchase Orders',
    (cast(t3.onhand as int) - cast(t3.iscommited as int))
      + cast(t3.onorder as int) as 'Missing POs'
    FROM
    itt1 t0
    inner join oitm t1 on t0.code = t1.itemcode
    inner join oitm t2 on t0.father = t2.itemcode
    LEFT JOIN OITW T3 ON T3.WHSCODE = T0.Warehouse AND T3.ItemCode = T0.Code
    Where T3.WHSCODE Like '%0%' and (cast(t3.onhand as int) - cast(t3.iscommited as int))
      + cast(t3.onorder as int) < 0
    ORDER BY
    (cast(t3.onhand as int) - cast(t3.iscommited as int))
      + cast(t3.onorder as int),t0.father, t0.code

  • Reporting - using the less than function or the filter.

    Hi,
    I am trying to make a report about the opportunities and their values. I decided to add 3 times the same revenue colomn because I wanted the first colomn to show me the revenus under 10000, the seconde one, the revenues between 10000 and 100000 and the third one, the revenues greater than 100000.
    In order to do that, I selected the function button in the creation of my rapport and I tried it 2 different ways.
    1° I choose the filter button (in the function pop up), select the field on my left panel and choose for the first colomn for example "less than" 100000.
    The formula that appears in this one:
    FILTER("- Revenue Custom Metrics".S_CUR_0+"- Revenue Custom Metrics".S_CUR_0 USING ("- Revenue Custom Metrics".S_CUR_0 < 100000))
    When I try to execute, I get this error message:
    [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 22034] Aggregate is not allowed within USING clause of a FILTER operator. (HY000)
    SQL Issued: SELECT "- Account Custom Attributes".PICK_3, "- Opportunity Custom Attributes".TEXT_30, "- Revenue Custom Metrics".S_CUR_0, FILTER("- Revenue Custom Metrics".S_CUR_0+"- Revenue Custom Metrics".S_CUR_0 USING ("- Revenue Custom Metrics".S_CUR_0 < 100000)), Opportunity."Current Sales Stage" FROM "Opportunity Analysis"
    2° I try to use the "<" sign without using the filter. So I click on the appropriate colomn and add < 100000, so it becomes:
    "- Revenue Custom Metrics".S_CUR_0+"- Revenue Custom Metrics".S_CUR_0 < 100000
    I receive the following error message:
    [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 27002] Near <<>: Syntax error [nQSError: 26012] . (HY000)
    SQL Issued: SELECT "- Account Custom Attributes".PICK_3, "- Opportunity Custom Attributes".TEXT_30, "- Revenue Custom Metrics".S_CUR_0, "- Revenue Custom Metrics".S_CUR_0+"- Revenue Custom Metrics".S_CUR_0 < 100000, Opportunity."Current Sales Stage" FROM "Opportunity Analysis"
    Can someone tell me what I did wrong ?
    Thanks a lot

    firstly, didn't understand why you are adding the metric to itself in the Fx.
    secondly, you could have used case when statements, something like CASE WHEN metric <10000 THEN metric ELSE NULL END and so forth

  • Wireline Connection Significantly Less Than Modem's

    I have a WRT160N router. When I connect my computer directly to my modem, my speeds are ~21000 kb/s DL and ~2500 kb/s UL. However, when I place my router between the two, I constently get less than 800 kb/s DL. The UL speed remains consistent at ~2500 kb/s.
    The lower speed of less than 800 kb/s occurs on all 4 wired access ports and wireless connection to my XP notebook. Is there anything in the settings that restricts the DL throughput?
    This issue didn't occur when I used the same router at my last address.

    Unfortunately, this didn't work. It actually seemed to make the connection slower, so I changed the setting back to Auto on the router.
    A friend has the same router, so I asked to borrow it. When plugged into my modem, his exhibited the same DL/UL behaviors as mine. Yet still, connecting directly to the modem shows >18Mbps up and >2.3Mbps down.
    Considering the router is just supposed to be a straight pipe with no limiter, I really don't understand why it is performing this way. All the tests were conducted with my laptop being the only computer on the network with the test being the only internet activity.

  • Capacity is showing significantly less than rated....

    I purchased a 160gb aTV. The summary on iTunes shows the capacity at 32.84gb. Where did all my storage go?
    I am only using it for music. At present I have 6gb loaded.
    Can someone tell me what is going on and how I can get the 160gb of storage I am supposed to have?
    Thanks.
    Adam Moos

    That's the exact amount of space that is on the 40gb Apple tv, either you accidentally bought the wrong one, or you got a 40gb one in a 160gb box. I'm sure if you bring it back to the store they'll help you out.

  • Date data from Crystal Report one day less than Date from Source

    Hi,
    I am creating a Crystal Report 4.0 for Enterprise Users (Client Version only) based on a BEx query. I have a field called 'Date' that I am bringing over from the BEx query. It has a format of MM/DD/YYYY. When I view the 'Date' in Crystal Reports, it is displaying as 1 day less from the actual data. For example, in the BEx Query, 'Date' = 11/01/2011.  In Crystal Reports, it is showing up as 10/31/2011, which is one day behind.  I'm not sure what's going on.
    Please help!

    Well, this is as weird as it gets!
    Here are the observations on SP02:
    1) The Date Characteristic is a day off in the report while the 'Key' shows correct date
    2) It displays in the '30.01.2011' (DD.MM.YYYY)format
    3) When you right-click this field to change the date format, the date option is missing
    4) You create a formula to see if this is a date and it returns True. The formula you can try is :
    isdate(). It returns False for any other function like isnumeric() etc
    5) So, this is a date filed, or CR4E thinks this is a date field, however doesn't let us change the format
    6) You cannot use this field with date functions like cdate(); weird!
    7) The only way you can show it the way you want is to write this formula:
    *mid(,4,2)&"/"&left(,2)&"/"&Right(,4)*
    This is still a string field, however displays as MM/DD/YYYY.
    In Crystal Reports 2011, however, the following formula on the same date field returns a date value, meaning you can further right-click this formula field to change the date format like a normal date field:
    cdate(tonumber(Right(,4)),tonumber(mid(,4,2)),tonumber(left(,2)))*
    The same formula, however, throws a 'String is non-numeric error in CR4E and I found that it doesn't like this:
    *tonumber(Right(,4)) ; same error
    I've tried a lot of combinations to make this a date field in CR4E, however none works!
    So, the only option is to use the formula that I mentioned above.
    P.S: If you install Patch 2.10, you'll notice that the Characteristic value shows the correct date. For some reason though, it is in the same format as the 'Key' and if we wish to change the date format, the only possible workaround is to extract the numbers and join like I suggested above.
    Hope this helps!
    -Abhilash

  • Hyper-V guest OS task manager reports more memory used than expected

    I have a Hyper-V node with 32 GB of system memory and 6 cores (12 logical processors with hyperthreading) running Windows Server 2012 Datacenter.  On this node I have a virtual machine with 4 GB of system memory and two logical processors running Windows
    Server 2008 R2 Standard.
    On the virtual machine, Task Manager show that 3.62 GB of memory are being used and 109 MB are free.  This is despite the fact that nothing is installed or running on the vm except the operating system.  The memory usage for all processes for all
    users as reported by Task Manager is under 100 MB.
    Any ideas on what can be causing such a huge discrepancy between the memory usage reported by Task Manager and reality?  The host OS reports 9.8 GB out of 32 GB memory usage (expected since several VMs are running on the host), but I would not think
    that the guest OS would be pegged.

    Busy two weeks.  Sorry I didn't respond sooner.
    I should clarify that I was not running Task Manager on the host machine, but rather on the guest OS.  Task manager on the VM was reporting incorrect memory usage for the VM.  Task Manager on the host machine was reporting correct information for
    the host.
    I would expect that a guest OS should have accurate metrics for its own memory usage as this is usually the case with visualization solutions (Sun VirtualBox, Citrix, VMWare).  Interestingly, although TaskManager on the guest OS is reporting incorrect
    (3.62 GB) memory usage, the Hyper-V Manager shows reasonable and likely correct (574 MB) memory usage.  Hyper-V Manager shows 598 MB of "Assigned Memory" and 574 MB of "Memory Demand", whereas TaskManager on the guest OS shows 3.62 GB of memory used. 
    I would have expected Task Manager on the guest OS to show 4 GB available, 574 MB used, about 3.4 GB free.

  • New 17' battery capacity 3000mAh less than my old 17

    After chewing through the battery far too quickly on a new 17' 2.3 I checked in system profiler/power at battery capacities of the new and old 17 (2.8 core 2 duo from 2009). The new 17 says 8729 mAh and the old one says 11879. That would explain the reason the new machine runs out of juice, but I dont understand the drop in capacity as Apple advertisers it has the same size battery as the older 17's.
    Does this 17 have a problem or have I missed something. Ideas please.
    Could others with a new or older 17 (unibody) please post your battery capacities to see if I am alone or whether others see the same thing. Thanks.
    I love the speed of this machine though. Far far faster.

    The current 17" MBP lists a 95 watt-hour battery.
    Assuming the nominal voltage is 10.8 volts like the removable batteries.
    95 watt-hours divided by 10.8 volts = 8.796 ampere-hours
    8.796 ampere-hours times 1000 = 8796 milliampere-hours
    8729 / 8796 * 100 = 99.2% of full charge capacity.
    Your battery is fine.
    Look up the specs for your old machine and perform the same calculations.

  • Capacity less than 30 GB

    I just bought my first iPdo - a 30GB. WHen I look under my setting, though, it lists my capacity as only 27.8 GB (and I hadn't even put anything on it yet).
    Is this normal? Is there a reason that my iPod's capacity is less than 30 GB? Thanks for any help!

    Asked and answered earlier in the day. See here...
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=416357&tstart=0
    Patrick

  • Reports showing more visits than Google Analytics

    Question:
    I have been receiving significantly high reports on numerous blogs posted across two different sites. When I compare the BC report to Google Analytics it's a massive different in numbers/page views.
    Page views on web pages seems normal. But the blog reporting is significantly higher than what we suspect.
    Answer:
    A couple of things:
    1, Always expect a 10% difference between BC reporting and a JavaScript based solution such as Google Analytics, as roughly 10% of web users browse with JavaScript disabled.
    With this disabled, Google Analytics has a very limited ability for tracking unique user visits, as it can't place a cookie on their system or send data back to the Google servers.
    As BC's tracking is all done server side (ie. not some code snippet you're pasting in), it should be able to more accurately measure these statistics.
    2. Some web crawlers may not bypass BCs filtering and hence be recorded as hits.
    For instance, with your blog you may have more heavily distributed links throughout the web via social media. A whole range of crawlers, archivers and indexers then visit those links to absorb the information and further spread it.
    Most of these automated browsers have JavaScript disabled, so again, your Google Analytics simply won't pick their traffic up.
    BC will record their traffic however, and they actively try to filter these out - but I'm sure some inevitably fall through the cracks  and get marked as legitimate traffic.

    Hi,
    Its just a general thought and I realize you know your application and user community better I do, but do you think your users are going to be very happy when they are presented with a report with more than a hundred columns? Have you considered maybe presenting the data in some sort of rolled up form from which the user can then drill down to the data they are particularly interested in. Also, I'm sure your LAN administrator would be happy not to see 100+ column by x number row reports being regularly shipped across the network.
    Also, 100+ column reports suggests tables with 100+ columns which are probably not designed in a very relationally compliant way. I find that good DB design usually results in applications that have to make less compromises, such as hacking export files in order to fool the API into making ridiculous, unsupported and unsupportable compromises.
    Just a thought..................
    Regards
    Andre

  • With my KLIPSCH - the FIDELITY and REAR VOLUME is signaficantly less than the front chan

    I had always been using KLIPSCH PRO AUDIO speakers, and I must say - they are simply incredible. I just bought another complete set of KLIPSCH 2. for the rear channel of my AUDIGY LS card ---- but and the FIDELITY and VOLUME is significantly less than the front channel. Is it that card? Is it the synthesized rear volume because it's not true 4 channel? It's that CMSS Or should I just hook up the rear to the front channel with a simple y connector?I want to hook up my whole whose with satellite KLIPCSH and just a few subwoofers.And I want to do with that LS card and Y connectors.Am I correct here - or do I need something MORE?__________Joliett

    Please tell me if I'm right...the rear speakers input from a stereo source is not true 4 channel. So the fidelity and volume is somewhat different than the front channel.
    To get the same fidelity, I need to use Y-connectors to join the fron speakers to the rear.
    Or is there a soundcard that is better for that kind of installation?

  • Disk Manager/Virtual Disk Manager Problem

    I have an apparently working NAS drive that I can see, read. write to, and whatever as normal.
    However backup/restore software cannot find the drive while Disk Manager shows it as "unknown" and "Not initialised" and Virtual Disk Manager reports it as "The Device is not Ready!"
    Obviously with Virtual Disk Manager not finding it I cannot initiate it.
    As I need to access the drive with a backup and restore prog does anyone know where I can go from here?

    Hi,
    Did you run Windows in a VM?
    Please start virtual disk service and set its startup type as "Automatically".
    Afterward, re-connect the drive into the computer for test. Remember to right click the disk and click to initialize disk.
    If the issue still persists, please upload the disk management snapshot as below:
    Karen Hu
    TechNet Community Support

  • EPM 2013 Report is displayed as cut off and shows less than half the width of the report in IE 10 and IE 9.

    EPM 2013 Report is displayed as cut off and shows less than half the width of the report in IE 10 and IE 9.  This issue occurs for some users only.I tried the same url in google chrome and is working fine.
    Can you please help.
    Please find the attached screenshot.

    Hi BJ1986,
    According to your description, I think this issue is caused by the IE browser that runs the report. To trouble shoot this issue, I suggest that we can try to clear internet temporary files, cookies and others in IE browser. And also add this site
    as a trusted site in IE browser to check this issue again.
    If this issue is still existed, it can also be occurred due to the setting or third party add-ons of Internet Explorer (IE). In this scenario, you can try to run IE in compatibility mode to check the issue again. Or I suggest that you can refer to the
    steps below to troubleshoot the issue:
    Click Tools -> Internet options.
    Switch to the Security tab, click Local intranet, and then select Default level.
    Switch to the Advanced tab, and click Restore advanced settings.
    Temporarily disable third party add-ons. For detailed steps, please see the link below: 
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-IN/internet-explorer/manage-add-ons#ie
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Katherine Xiong
    Katherine Xiong
    TechNet Community Support

  • Why is capacity on my ipod classic is significantly lower than expected?

    I have a new 80 GB ipod classic. I loaded it with about 4 GB's or so of music in the first couple of days. Then on the the third day when I tried to add more music, it erased everything off the ipod that I had loaded previously and replaced it with the new music I had added by CD to my itunes library. Not knowing what to do, I "restored" the ipod by using the restore button then sync'd again with the result that all my music was back including the original music. The problem: it's as if the first 6 GB's of space is still used up and the scale on my summary tab shows the total capacity of my ipod as 74.31 GB's with only 5 GB's of music and other on the ipod. What is taking up the other space? It should be showing a total capacity of 80 BG with 75 GB's left. What's up? Any body know?

    my summary tab shows the total capacity of my ipod as 74.31 GB's with only 5 GB's of music and other on the ipod. What is taking up the other space? It should be showing a total capacity of 80 BG with 75 GB's left. What's up? Any body know?
    All hard drives never have the full advertised storage space, and as a general rule it's around 7% less than stated.
    It's because hard drive manufacturers calculate hard drive space different than computers actually read it.
    For a full technical explanation, see these.
    Hard disk: Is it missing space?
    How much content will fit on my iPod?

  • Disk utility reports smaller hard drive size than actual

    I have been using a 3tb external drive (Formatted mac osx journaled) without any problems on my mac mini.  Suddenly, it no longer allows me to write to the drive and more often it does not even recognize the drive when it is in the caddy.  The caddy supports USB3 and is fairly new.  The hard drive is a 7200rpm seagate. 
    When looking at the drive in disk utility, it states that the drive is 2.2 TB while the size is 3TB.
    Does anyone have similar problems? Any recommendations?
    Currently on OS X version 10.8.5.
    Thanks!
    When I insert the drive in the caddy I get the error message that it is not readable.  Disk utility reports it as 2.2tb.  The drive is a 3TB Seagate.

    Hi Eric,
    Can't really hook it up directly to a mac mini as the mini is pretty sealed.  I did connect it to a PC as I wanted to run SpinRite on it and SpinRite gave me an error message that the Drive Size reported was less than the actual physical drive size.
    SpinRite recommended not to perform any actions on the drive due to this discrepancy.
    Not sure where to go at this point.
    I could try to re-format the 3TB with OS X Journal and see if I get the 3tb back...

Maybe you are looking for