Display planned depreciation values for depre areas

Hi,
I have 2 depreciation areas, 01 for book and 04 for local depreciation.
How do I display the periodic depre values for 04 in asset explorer posted values tab if I don't want to maintain a derived depre area?
Your assistance will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you

Hi,
if area 04 does not post, you will not get any info on the "posted" values tab. Simply because this area does NOT post to G/L then.
Only parallel depreciation areas, or real depreciation areas which are part of the definition of a POSTING derived depreciation area get also period values stored, this is the exception. But a standalone real depreciation area, which does not post and which is not parallel will not store period depreciation values.
Regards,
Markus

Similar Messages

Planned depreciation value for each period

Hi,
Where can I get the planned depreciation value for each period? I need the fields for customised report.
Thank you

Hi,
You can get the dep planned values for the each period by using SAP standard report S_ALR_87012936.
In the selection screen of that report, click on All selections button on application tool bar. Then you will be able to see the all the available fields for selection.
Choose evaluation period as Month.
Now execute it. After getting output, you need to go for change layout and adopt fileds like Dep 01-2010, Dep 02-2010, Dep 03-2010....Etc till Dep 12-2010.
This will fix your requirement.
Thanks,
Srinu

SAP Planned Depreciation Values

Hi,
Can anybody suggest how can I bring the total planned depreciation values (month wise).
I would like to know the structure, table or function module.
We have tried with function module ANEP_AFARECHNEN but notfetching the results.
I know ANLC table shows the values but only for the years that are roll-forwarded by the system.
But, I want the planned depreciation values for complete life of the asset.
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards,
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
For depreciation planned value by month, it should be calculated using the total value from table ANLC by double checking program AW01N perhaps storing in work area within the program.
As for depreciaiont posted monthly from acquisition up until now, table ANLP shall gives the details monthly.
Hope the above helps.
Kind regards,
John Chin

Difference in planned depreciation value because of wrong positing of unpla

Hi All,
1.     Unplanned depreciation has been posted in last fiscal year.
2.     Amount posted in IGAAP was higher than IFRS value.
3.     Now planned value of depreciation in being calculated by system is not equal for both books (IFRS / IGAAP) because of difference in unplanned depreciation posted in last year.
Example "
IFRS -01 AREA- 765431.89
IGGAP-02 AREA- 765431.78       = 0.11 difference in 01 and 02 areas.
T.codeABCO i posted unplanned depreciation in 01 area after posting 01 and 01 unplanned depreciation amount are same but Planned depreciation values show 0.11 difference.
Please suggest what steps needs t be followed to settle this difference of depreciation in both books.
Thanks in advance

Hi Kishore,
please check if area 03 = - 01 + 02 and you have special settings in OADB for area 03.
In this case the system makes roundigs to fulfill this settings.
regards Bernhard

FM for Planned depreciation amount for assets

Hello everyone,
Is there any FM / method (FM other than 'AM_SHOW_POST_DEPR') to find planned depreciation values of assets.
Regards,
Kiran

Hi,
These values are calculated during the deprieciation run.
Dont think you have any standard fm's for this.
you can go through transaction s_alr_87012004 & s_alr_87012936 for more details

I've just bought a Macbook Pro 15" and I'm trying to use Photoshop, but the resolution its displaying the images at for 100% are too small. I have to design for the web, so need to be intricate with detail, but I'm finding it adjusts the resolution of the

I've just bought a Macbook Pro 15" and I'm trying to use Photoshop, but the resolution its displaying the images at for 100% are too small. I have to design for the web, so need to be intricate with detail, but I'm finding it adjusts the resolution of the image right down. (I mean you can see the image clearly, but it's too small to edit). When I look at Safari and see a web page at 100% it's clear, but the same page displayed in Photoshop CC appears 50% of the size (even though it says it's 100%) If I move the application window to another screen it adjusts it correctly – leaving all the pallettes, menus and tools correctly sized as they are on the retina display Is there some way to adjust the way Photoshop CC displays images so it is more consistent with what you actually see? There doesn't seem to be any answer on the Adobe forum, so hopefully someone here can shed some light. MacBook Pro with Retina display, 15", OS X Yosemite (10.10.2), Photoshop CC 2014

I tested both ways. With "open in low resolution" ckecked the size of the images is cool, but it is low-resolution including Photoshop appearance.
If "open in low resolution" is unckecked the appearance is good but the very small size.
See the image below. It has 650 x 732 px, 72 dpi. The font of the text "Neste aniversário ..." is with 18pt.

Display only positive values for a particular Keyfigure

Hi..
(Sorry, I accidentally posted this also in Datawarehousing forum, actually it related to BeX forum).
For a particular column(keyfigure) in my report, the user wants to display only positive values.
I used the formula from the one of the forums
(Keyfig > 0)* Keyfig.
This displays only positive values in the column as required. But, the result for this column is also affected. As the result is negative, it shows, zero in the result for this column.
Is there a way in which the result will not be affected by the formula?
I went into the properties of the particular keyfigure and chose Calculate Result as -> Summation.
It throws out the following error message
'Calculating result as...' was not executed
Message no. BRAIN141
Diagnosis
The function 'Calculate Results as ...' could not be used in all
instances.
The recalculation of a result cell always occurs based on the set of
detailed cells subordinated to this cell. This is the most detailed
level of the drilldown. Therefore it is not posible to recalculate in
hierarchical lists. The calculation of a results cell is not performed
if a cell or column with an expand symbol is assigned beneath it.
Otherwise the newly calculated result is changed every time one of its
lower-level nodes is expanded. This is not supported for technical
reasons and would also only confuse users.
Note, however, that calculating with "Suppress Results" is always
executed because the restriction described above does not apply in this
case.
NOTE:
The query shows the keyfigure values for a selected title, for profit center and territory hierarchies.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Sai.

Hi Deepu,
Thanks for the reply. I tried with ur formula.
LEAF(keyfig) gives all values "zero" for that particular column including the result.
NOT LEAF(keyfig) gives all values "one" for that particular column including the result.
So, ur formula gives the same values as of the present column values.
I tried condition, but it's not working...it says the following errors...
There is a condit. on Title, results row suppress. active on Profit Center
(conditional
Message no. BRAIN144
Diagnosis
Characteristic Title has an output condition and the 'Suppress Results
    Cells' property is active for Profit Center. This generally leads to an
    incomprehensible output list.
System response
As soon as an output condition is defined for a characteristic (here
    Title), the system calculates the corresponding result cells and applies
    the output condition. If a result cell of this type is later deleted by
    the condition, all the lower-level detail and result cells in its
    drilldown are suppressed. Because the result cell is suppressed the
    Title rows are then omitted from Profit Center.
In extreme cases this can lead to an entirely empty list being
     displayed, although the single rows or columns would be displayed if the
     condition were deactivated.
Procedure
Check the query settings, especially results row suppression and the
     output conditions.
Procedure for System Administration
You can deactivate this message Brain 144 with transaction RSRT1.
There is a condit. on Profit Center, results row suppress. active on
Territory as in SPL (conditional
Message no. BRAIN144
Diagnosis
Characteristic Profit Center has an output condition and the 'Suppress
    Results Cells' property is active for Territory as in SPL. This
    generally leads to an incomprehensible output list.
System response
As soon as an output condition is defined for a characteristic (here
    Profit Center), the system calculates the corresponding result cells and
    applies the output condition. If a result cell of this type is later
    deleted by the condition, all the lower-level detail and result cells in
    its drilldown are suppressed. Because the result cell is suppressed the
    Profit Center rows are then omitted from Territory as in SPL.
In extreme cases this can lead to an entirely empty list being
     displayed, although the single rows or columns would be displayed if the
     condition were deactivated.
Procedure
Check the query settings, especially results row suppression and the
     output conditions.
Procedure for System Administration
You can deactivate this message Brain 144 with transaction RSRT1.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Sai.

Plan hash value for two queries!

Hi,
DB : Oracle 11g (11.2.0.3.0)
OS: RHEL 5
I have two question:
1. Can two queries have same plan hash value? I mean I have below two queries:
SELECT /+ NO_MERGE */ MIN(payor.next_review_date)*
* FROM payor*
* WHERE payor.review_complete = 0*
* AND payor.closing_date IS NULL*
* AND payor.patient_key = 10;*
and
SELECT MIN(payor.next_review_date)
* FROM payor*
* WHERE payor.review_complete = 0*
* AND payor.closing_date IS NULL*
* AND payor.patient_key = 10;*
When I tried to review the execution plan for both queries, the plan hash value remain same. Does it mean that execution plan for both queries are same? If yes, then how Oracle understands or changes the execution plan based on hint. If no then what plan hash value represents?
2. If the execution plan with hint and without hint is same except for a given query except no.of rows and bytes. Does it mean that query with less rows and bytes scanned is better?
Thanks in advance
-Onkar

Hi,
there are two different things. One is EXPLAIN PLAN, which is how the optimizer thinks the query will be executed. It contains some estimates of cost, cardinalities etc. There is also EXECUTION PLAN. It also contains all this information regarding the optimizer estimates, but on the top of that, it also contains information about actual I/O incurred, actual cardinalities, actual timings etc.
So if a hint is changing optimizer estimates, but the plan stays the same, then impact on query's performance is zero.
If the actual numbers are changing, this is probably also irrelevant to the hint (e.g. you can have less physical reads because more blocks are found in the buffer cache the second time you're running the query, or you less work because you don't have to parse the statement etc.).
Actually, most of optimizer hints don't affect optimizer estimates; rather, they try to get the optimizer to use a certain access method or a certain join order etc. regardless of the cost. So you must be talking about such hints as cardinality, dynamic_sampling etc. If that's not the case -- please clarify, because this means that something wrong is going on here (e.g. an INDEX hint may work or it may fail to work, but if it fails, optimizer estimates shouldn't change).
Best regards,
Nikolay

Default value for variable are not within permitted value range (precalc)

Hello BW community
Issue:
I have created a variable (Characteristic Value/ Manual input-default value) and use the precalculated value set (details-basic settings). In the further variable definition I could select the precalculated value set in 'Default values', which I have defined beforehand in the broadcaster..
The precalculated value set in the broadcaster settings is just based on a master data query on 0CUSTOMER.
Error:
The variable gets the error E991/R9E Errors: Default values for variable 'XXX' are not within permitted value range.
The detail description of the error is: You defined default values for variable 'Sold-to party precalc value set for manuel input' that are not appropriate for the variable type; for example, a range is defined as a default value for a variable that only permits a single value.
So please has someone had the same issue and found out how to solve it? It would be excelent to get good solution for this issue.
Best regards and thanks
Christian
PS-1: System BW 701 / SAPKW70105
PS-2 : there has been a SDN entry with the same topic but not resolved too.
link: /thread/980839 [original link is broken]

Hello,
Thanks for your response.
I should have mentioned that in my post. I tried this very first time. I thought that this is the place where you provide default value. But I got following exception at that time, so I thought, may be this is used for something else.
<LifecycleImpl> <_handleException> ADF_FACES-60098:Faces lifecycle receives unhandled exceptions in phase RENDER_RESPONSE 6
javax.faces.FacesException: javax.servlet.ServletException: OracleJSP error:
oracle.jbo.NameClashException: JBO-25001: Object viewAllInd of type Control Binding Definition already exists.
at com.sun.faces.context.ExternalContextImpl.dispatch(ExternalContextImpl.java:415)Do I need handle something else when you put the default value?
Thanks,
Jai

Planning file entry for MRP Area

Hi,
To create planning file entry in the background at plant level we use Transaction MDAB. I would like to know that if MRP area is active than whats the T-code for planning file entry in the background at mrp area level?? To create manualy in the Trx md20 we have that option to select mrp area & plant. So please let me know yours view on this.
Thanks & Regards
Kundan Kumar

Dear,
If planning file entry are there on plant level then system will convert same on MRp area level. Have you check that tables? (DBVM)
For planning file entry at MRP area lvel , use report RMDBVM00 (transaction OM0F) to convert the existing table MDVM with the planning file entries into table DBVM. The conversion is also described in MRP Customizing: TA OPP1 -> Planning File Entries.
There is no need of MDAB just check your entry in MD21 take a MRP run at MRP area lvel and come back if any problem.
If you want to schedule it on MRP area lvel then use the MDRE or use program RMMDVM10 and in variant here select the MRP Area redio button.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar
Edited by: R Brahmankar on Oct 26, 2009 6:25 PM

- How to Display Sales Qty & Value for This Year & Last Year in 2 Columns -

Dear All,
I'm having trouble in extracting the last year figures based date entered. I'm actually would like to create a query where I'm able to know the "TOP 10 item sold based item category". I've created a query, which show the top10 item sold (total quantity & value) for this year, but not able to display the last year figure (quantity). Please advise & thanks for your help and time.
SET ROWCOUNT 10
SELECT T1.ItemCode, T2.ItemName, T3.ItmsGrpNam, SUM(T1.Quantity) as "Total Qty Sold", SUM(T1.TotalSumSy) as "Total Amount"
FROM ODLN T0 INNER JOIN DLN1 T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry INNER JOIN OITM T2 ON T1.ItemCode = T2.ItemCode INNER JOIN OITB T3 ON T2.ItmsGrpCod = T3.ItmsGrpCod
WHERE T0.DocDate >='[%0]' AND T0.DocDate <='[%1]' AND T3.ItmsGrpNam ='[%A]'
GROUP BY T1.ItemCode, T2.ItemName, T3.ItmsGrpNam
ORDER by SUM(T1.Quantity) DESC
I wish to have the output as follow
Item   Qty (2008) Qty (2007)    Value(2008)   Value(2007)
A       300             150               1000                      500
B       250             300                 800                      650
C       100             250                 700                      550
Currently, My results display:
Item   Qty (2008) Value(2008)
A       300             1000
B       250               800
C       100               700
Cheers,
Serene

Hi,
if you want more flexible, you could try this modified Istvan's query:
SELECT top 10 T1.ItemCode, T2.ItemName, T3.ItmsGrpNam,   SUM(T1.Quantity) as "Total Qty Sold",
SUM(T1.TotalSumSy) as "Total Amount" ,
(select sum (r.Quantity) from ODLN h
     inner join DLN1 r on h.DocEntry=r.DocEntry
     where h.DocDate>='[%4]' and h.DocDate<='[%5]'
         and r.ItemCode=T1.ItemCode) '2007 Sold',
(select sum (r.TotalSumSy) from ODLN h
     inner join DLN1 r on h.DocEntry=r.DocEntry
     where h.DocDate>='[%6]' and h.DocDate<='[%7]'
         and r.ItemCode=T1.ItemCode) '2007 Amount'
FROM ODLN T0 INNER JOIN DLN1 T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry INNER JOIN OITM T2 ON T1.ItemCode = T2.ItemCode INNER JOIN OITB T3 ON T2.ItmsGrpCod = T3.ItmsGrpCod
WHERE T0.DocDate >='[%0]' AND T0.DocDate <='[%1]' AND T3.ItmsGrpNam between '[%2]' and '[%3]'
GROUP BY T1.ItemCode, T2.ItemName, T3.ItmsGrpNam
ORDER by SUM(T1.Quantity) DESC
Rgds,

How to make default value for controlling area for MDG-F 7.0

how do we default certain pre-defined values for few fields? e.g. controlling area or company code for MDG finance?
Thank you in advance.
SP

Hello Sahil
Account and CC/PC are 2 different entity types. For PC and CC there is dependency. First you have to load Cost centers and then load PC.
For CC - load CC master data first. Then load hierarchy file then group file and finally assignment file.
Follow same process for PC.
GL you can load independently but you have first load group GL then operational GL and then GL at company code level,
Kiran

Turning PM notification into work order - standard value for business area

Hello,
when turning a PM notification into a work order in IW22, by pressing the create button, a windows comes up where
'Order type', 'Business Area' and 'Main Work Center' can be entered.
The field for business area is empty, but I would like to set a standard value, that comes up automatically when this window opens.
Where can I make settings for that?
Thanks
Anne

in IW22 go to - extras -settings- default values
note - these will apply to your user id only

Planned cost/ value for CJ40 tcode

Hi
We have a requirement where we need to find out the Planned Costs booked against a WBS element, in a year. The costs can be against all the plan versions or on individual plan version.How to find total object-numbesr for a WBS element
Regards
Ravi.

Hi Swastik,
Those cost elements (category 31) are used to calculate and store WIP values at the detailed level of so called line IDs.
Line IDs are groups of cost elements that were posted to production order.
For example you can calculate and store WIP separately for Raw Materials, Semis, Activities and overhead.
You can also settle them to different GL Accounts via mapping in txn.OKG8.
Hope it helps,
Szymon

Planning book values for certain key figures show doubled up numbers

currently on SCM 7.0, we are facing a strange intermittent issue of doubled up values in planning book for certain key figures when compared to the underlying Infocube.
This happens when the Input process step happens, some times when the process step fails in chain and is run again.
After its run then we load data to the planning book , then when the key figures show up for the current week bucket they show Doubled up values
We tried to run a consistency check /SAPAPO/OM17 (DP time series option) but no result.
Can anyone mention what could be the reason ?

Hi,
Please check the data in the cube for the codes . There could be double request for the same keyfigure. When you copy from cube whatever value avilable in the cube gets into Planning book.
Transaction : LISTCUBE
Solution : Delete the old request and check the value agina in cube. Execute the TSCUBE.
Thanks,
Jeysraj

Display planned depreciation values for depre areas

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for