Distributed cache during solution deployment

Hi,
We are using MySite newsfeed.
What is the best practice during deployment of solution the distributed cache is not affected.
Last time when we did IIS reset the feed was lost and we have to use repopulated job to pull the data.Is there any beetr way to follow during deployment and server upgrades.
Thanks,
Sudan

Hi Sudan,
The Distributed Cache service stores data in-memory only, so executing iisreset might cause cache flush. Please refer to the thread below to move all cached items from local cache to other cache host in the cluster:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/6a415c75-4ca3-4c43-9110-25a68db93a54/sharepoint-2013-my-site-newsfeed-posts-disappear?forum=sharepointgeneral
Regards,
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

IO error writing cache during ejb deployment

I am getting this error a lot when I deploy an ear to standalone oc4j. This happens when I run from the command line or from jdeveloper. Retrying it eventually works, sometimes to speed things up I shutdown oc4j and remove the file. Is there some way to prevent this from happening.
com.evermind.compiler.CompilationException: Error instantiating compiler: IO error writing cache: D:\oc4j\j2ee\home\application-deployments\WebTSApp\WebTSejb.jar\deployment.cache
at com.evermind.server.ejb.compilation.Compilation.compileClasses(Compilation.java:500)

This was a known issue before the preview release.
Workaround for the problem would be to change the Application name and EAR file name.
If you have the EJB deployment profile, Right mouse on it and choose Settings.
Change the name of the EAR file and the Application name and redeploy.
raghu
JDev Team

Programmatically use distributed caching in SharePoint 2013?

As per below TechNet article, developers are not allowed to use the AppFabric instance that comes with SharePoint 2013. The expectation is to deploy a seperate AppFabric cluster for custom applications.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj219572.aspx#Important
Distributed caching was a long waited, nice SharePoint feature but it does not make sense to restrict developer access to this. We have a requirement to cache fairly smaller amount of data (must be distributed), but cannot deploy a separate Cache servers
for this. What are my options (other than System.Web.Caching)? Is there an API to safely cache smaller amount of data? What is the rationale behind restricting access to default AppFabric instance come with SharePoint?
Thanks in Advance,
Amal

Yes, it's just a thread-safe implementation of object cache and not a distributed cache. Probably the reason behind recommending to use a separate AppFabric cache cluster is that additional named caches of custom solutions and applications will
interfere with SharePoint named caches. Without a scope and priority defined, the named caches of custom solutions may start evicting SharePoint items if their usage is much higher than that of SharePoint ones.
AppFabric Caching and SharePoint: Concepts and Examples (Part
1)
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Slalom.

Solution Deployment Problem (Administrative Framework Object Dependencies)

I'm having a problem with the deployment of a SharePoint workflow solution - hopefully someone can help me out.
Here is the sequence of STSADM commands and their output from the console:
C:\Workflows>stsadm -o deactivatefeature -name IL.SharePoint.Workflows -url http://localhost/ -force
Operation completed successfully.
C:\Workflows>stsadm -o uninstallfeature -name IL.SharePoint.Workflows -force
Operation completed successfully.
C:\Workflows>stsadm -o retractsolution -name IL.SharePoint.Workflows.wsp -local
DeploymentSucceeded : server : The solution was successfully deployed.
il.sharepoint.workflows.wsp: Operation completed with errors.
C:\Workflows>stsadm -o deletesolution -name IL.SharePoint.Workflows.wsp
Operation completed successfully.
C:\Workflows>stsadm -o addsolution -filename IL.SharePoint.Workflows.wsp
An object in the SharePoint administrative framework, "SPSolutionLanguagePack Name=0 Parent=SPSolution Name=il.sharepoint.workflows.wsp", depends on other objects which do not exist. Ensure that all of the objects dependencies are created and retry this operation.
IL.SharePoint.Workflows.wsp: The Solution installation failed.
Here is the related log info from the SharePoint logs:
error-redacted.txt
As far as I can see, SP is attempting to insert a "SPSolutionLanguagePack" object into the configuration database, with an invalid foreign key reference to the solution. Obviously there is already something fishy going on during solution retraction as well..
The only possible cause I can think of:
The virtual machine(s) on which I'm trying to do this deployment (a test environment) were created from the production environment. Somehow, in the process of creating the virtuals, their OS's regional settings got reset to English/US from their desired setting. I've also got a warning in the event log (event id 2486) of the SP host, that the system locale has changed. Weird thing is that another test environment, created from the same set of virtuals and using the same solution package, is not experiencing this problem. Granted, that environment's regional settings were changed back to the desired values at some point, but I've tried doing the same in the problem environment without success.
Needless to say it's critical for me to be able to test a deployment.. but what's more worrying is that this could occur in the production environment before I've figured out how to solve it.
Any help much appreciated! :)

we can deploy any components using solution package (WSP). The below steps ensures that Config refresh timer service occurs.
1.     Stop the Windows SharePoint Timer Service
2.     Open C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\Microsoft\SharePoint\Config\<<GUID>> folder
3.     Take backup of Cache.ini file
4.     Delete all the XML files in the GUID folder
5.     Open the Cache.ini file in edit mode and delete the contents of it.
6.     Type 1.Save and close the file.
7.     Start the Windows SharePoint Timer Service.
Thanks

How can i configure Distributed cache servers and front-end servers for Streamlined topology in share point 2013??

my question is regarding SharePoint 2013 Farm topology. if i want go with Streamlined topology and having (2 distribute cache and Rm servers+ 2 front-end servers+ 2 batch-processing servers+ cluster sql server) then how distributed servers will
be connecting to front end servers? Can i use windows 2012 NLB feature? if i use NLB and then do i need to install NLB to all distributed servers and front-end servers and split-out services? What will be the configuration regarding my scenario.
Thanks in Advanced!

For the Distributed Cache servers, you simply make them farm members (like any other SharePoint servers) and turn on the Distributed Cache service (while making sure it is disabled on all other farm members). Then, validate no other services (except for
the Foundation Web service due to ease of solution management) is enabled on the DC servers and no end user requests or crawl requests are being routed to the DC servers. You do not need/use NLB for DC.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Foundation 2013 Farm and Distributed Cache settings

We are on a 3 tier farm - 1 WFE + 1APP + 1SQL - have had many issues with AppFab and Dist Cache; and an additional issue with noderunner/Search Services. Memory and CPU running very high. Read that we shouldn't be running Search
and Dist Cache in the same server, nor using a WFE as a cache host. I don't have the budget to add another server in my environment.
I found an article (IderaWP_CachingFormSharePointPerformance.pdf) saying "To make use of SharePoint's caching capabilities requires a Server version of the platform." because it requires the publishing feature, which Foundation doesn't have.
So, I removed Distributed Cache (using Powershell) from my deployment and disabled the AppFab. This resolved 90% of server errors but performance didn't improve. Now, not only I'm getting errors now on Central Admin. - expects Dist Cache
- but I'm getting disk operations reading of 4000 ms.
Questions:
1) Should I enable AppFab and disable cache?
2) Does Foundation support Dist Cache? Do I need to run Distributed Cache?
3) If so, can I run with just 1 cache host? If I shouldn't run it on a WFE or an App server with Search, do I have to stop Search all together? What happens with 2 tier farms out there?
4) Reading through the labyrinth of links on TechNet and MSDN on the subject, most of them says "Applies to SharePoint Server".
5) Anyone out there on a Foundation 2013 production environment that could share your experience?
Thanks in advance for any help with this!
Monica
Monica

That article is referring to BlobCache, not Distributed Cache. BlobCache requires Publishing, hence Server, but DistributedCache is required on all SharePoint 2013 farms, regardless of edition.
I would leave your DistCache on the WFE, given the App Server likely runs Search. Make sure you install
AppFabric CU5 and make sure you make the changes as noted in the KB for
AppFabric CU3.
You'll need to separately investigate your disk performance issues. Could be poor disk layout, under spec'ed disks, and so on. A detail into the disks that support SharePoint would be valuable (type, kind, RPM if applicable, LUNs in place, etc.).
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

High-units reflect twice the amount with dual JVM's in a distributed cache

HI all,
I have a question - i have a near cache scheme defined - running 4 JVM's with my application deployed to it (localstorage=false) - and 2 JVM's for the distributed cache (localstorage=true)
The high-units is set to 2000 - but the cache is allowing 4000. Is this b/c each JVM will allow for 2000 high-units each?
I was under the impression that as long as coherence is running in the same multi-cast address and port - that the total high-units would be 2000 not 4000.
Thanks...

user644269 wrote:
HI all,
I have a question - i have a near cache scheme defined - running 4 JVM's with my application deployed to it (localstorage=false) - and 2 JVM's for the distributed cache (localstorage=true)
The high-units is set to 2000 - but the cache is allowing 4000. Is this b/c each JVM will allow for 2000 high-units each?
I was under the impression that as long as coherence is running in the same multi-cast address and port - that the total high-units would be 2000 not 4000.
Thanks...Hi,
the high-unit setting is per-backing map, so in your case it means 2000 units per storage-enabled nodes.
From 3.5 it will become a bit more complex with the partition aware backing maps.
Best regards,
Robert

Newsfeed error - The operation failed because the server could not access the distributed cache.

Recently installed SharePoint 2013 RTM, on the newsfeed page an error is displayed, and no entries display in the following or everyone tabs.
"The operation failed because the server could not access the distributed cache."
Reading through various posts, I've checked:
- Activity feeds and mentions tabs are working as expected.
- User Profile Service is operational and syncing as expected
- Search is operational and indexing as expected
- The farm was installed based on the autospinstaller scripts.
- Don't believe this to be a permissions issue, during testing added accounts to the admin group to verify
Any suggestions are welcomed, thanks.
The full error message and trace logs is as follows.
SharePoint returned the following error: The operation failed because the server could not access the distributed cache. Internal type name: Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.MicrofeedException. Internal error code: 55. Contact your system administrator
for help in resolving this problem.
From the trace logs there's several messages which are triggered around the same time:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-AU/library/System.ServiceModel.Diagnostics.TraceHandledException.aspxHandling an exception. Exception details: System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.FeedCacheFault]: Unexpected exception in
FeedCacheService.GetPublishedFeed: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.. (Fault Detail is equal to Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.FeedCacheFault)./LM/W3SVC/2/ROOT/d71732192b0d4afdad17084e8214321e-1-129962393079894191System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[[Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.FeedCacheFault,
Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c]], System.ServiceModel, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089Unexpected exception in FeedCacheService.GetPublishedFeed: Object
reference not set to an instance of an object..
at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.FeedCacheService.Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.IFeedCacheService.GetPublishedFeed(FeedCacheRetrievalEntity fcTargetEntity, FeedCacheRetrievalEntity fcViewingEntity, FeedCacheRetrievalOptions fcRetOptions)
at SyncInvokeGetPublishedFeed(Object , Object[] , Object[] )
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.SyncMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object instance, Object[] inputs, Object[]& outputs)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.DispatchOperationRuntime.InvokeBegin(MessageRpc& rpc)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage5(MessageRpc& rpc)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage31(MessageRpc& rpc)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.MessageRpc.Process(Boolean isOperationContextSet)System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.FeedCacheFault]: Unexpected exception in FeedCacheService.GetPublishedFeed: Object reference not
set to an instance of an object.. (Fault Detail is equal to Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.FeedCacheFault).
SPSocialFeedManager.GetFeed: Exception: Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.MicrofeedException: ServerErrorFetchingConsolidatedFeed : ( Unexpected exception in FeedCacheService.GetPublishedFeed: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.. ) : Correlation
ID:db6ddc9b-8d2e-906e-db86-77e4c9fab08f : Date and Time : 31/10/2012 1:40:20 PM
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.SPMicrofeedThreadCollection.PopulateConsolidated(SPMicrofeedRetrievalOptions retOptions, SPMicrofeedContext context)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.SPMicrofeedThreadCollection.Populate(SPMicrofeedRetrievalOptions retrievalOptions, SPMicrofeedContext context)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.SPMicrofeedManager.CommonGetFeedFor(SPMicrofeedRetrievalOptions retrievalOptions)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.SPMicrofeedManager.CommonPubFeedGetter(SPMicrofeedRetrievalOptions feedOptions, MicrofeedPublishedFeedType feedType, Boolean publicView)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.SPMicrofeedManager.GetPublishedFeed(String feedOwner, SPMicrofeedRetrievalOptions feedOptions, MicrofeedPublishedFeedType typeOfPubFeed)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.SPSocialFeedManager.Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.ISocialFeedManagerProxy.ProxyGetFeed(SPSocialFeedType type, SPSocialFeedOptions options)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.SPSocialFeedManager.<>c__DisplayClass4b`1.<S2SInvoke>b__4a()
Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.SPSocialFeedManager.GetFeed: Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.MicrofeedException: ServerErrorFetchingConsolidatedFeed : ( Unexpected exception in FeedCacheService.GetPublishedFeed: Object reference not set to an instance of
an object.. ) : Correlation ID:db6ddc9b-8d2e-906e-db86-77e4c9fab08f : Date and Time : 31/10/2012 1:40:20 PM
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.SPMicrofeedThreadCollection.PopulateConsolidated(SPMicrofeedRetrievalOptions retOptions, SPMicrofeedContext context)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.SPMicrofeedThreadCollection.Populate(SPMicrofeedRetrievalOptions retrievalOptions, SPMicrofeedContext context)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.SPMicrofeedManager.CommonGetFeedFor(SPMicrofeedRetrievalOptions retrievalOptions)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.SPMicrofeedManager.CommonPubFeedGetter(SPMicrofeedRetrievalOptions feedOptions, MicrofeedPublishedFeedType feedType, Boolean publicView)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.SPMicrofeedManager.GetPublishedFeed(String feedOwner, SPMicrofeedRetrievalOptions feedOptions, MicrofeedPublishedFeedType typeOfPubFeed)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.SPSocialFeedManager.Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.ISocialFeedManagerProxy.ProxyGetFeed(SPSocialFeedType type, SPSocialFeedOptions options)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.SPSocialFeedManager.<>c__DisplayClass4b`1.<S2SInvoke>b__4a()
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.SPSocialUtil.InvokeWithExceptionTranslation[T](ISocialOperationManager target, String name, Func`1 func)
Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.SPSocialFeedManager.GetFeed: Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.SPSocialException: The operation failed because the server could not access the distributed cache. Internal type name: Microsoft.Office.Server.Microfeed.MicrofeedException.
Internal error code: 55.
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.SPSocialUtil.TryTranslateExceptionAndThrow(Exception exception)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.SPSocialUtil.InvokeWithExceptionTranslation[T](ISocialOperationManager target, String name, Func`1 func)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.SPSocialFeedManager.<>c__DisplayClass48`1.<S2SInvoke>b__47()
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Social.SPSocialUtil.InvokeWithExceptionTranslation[T](ISocialOperationManager target, String name, Func`1 func)

Thanks Thuan,
I've restarted to the Distrubiton Cache servicem and the error is still occuring.
The AppFabric Caching Service is running under the service apps account, and does appear operational based on:
> use-cachecluster
> get-cache
CacheName            [Host]
                     Regions
default
DistributedAccessCache_1e9f4999-0187-40e8-aa92-f8308d47d6e9
DistributedActivityFeedCache_1e9f4999-0187-40e8-aa92-f8308d47d6e9
DistributedActivityF [SERVER:22233]
eedLMTCache_1e9f4999 LMT(Primary)
-0187-40e8-aa92-f830
8d47d6e9
DistributedBouncerCache_1e9f4999-0187-40e8-aa92-f8308d47d6e9
DistributedDefaultCache_1e9f4999-0187-40e8-aa92-f8308d47d6e9
DistributedLogonToke [SERVER:22233]
nCache_1e9f4999-0187 Default_Region_0538(Primary)
-40e8-aa92-f8308d47d Default_Region_0004(Primary)
6e9                  Default_Region_0451(Primary)
DistributedSearchCache_1e9f4999-0187-40e8-aa92-f8308d47d6e9
DistributedSecurityTrimmingCache_1e9f4999-0187-40e8-aa92-f8308d47d6e9
DistributedServerToAppServerAccessTokenCache_1e9f4999-0187-40e8-aa92-f8308d47d6e9

Different distributed caches within the cluster

Hi,
i've three machines n1 , n2 and n3 respectively that host tangosol. 2 of them act as the primary distributed cache and the third one acts as the secondary cache. i also have weblogic running on n1 and based on some requests pumps data on to the distributed cache on n1 and n2. i've a listener configured on n1 and n2 and on the entry deleted event i would like to populate tangosol distributed service running on n3. all the 3 nodes are within the same cluster.
i would like to ensure that the data directly coming from weblogic should only be distributed across n1 and n2 and NOT n3. for e.g. i do not start an instance of tangosol on node n3. and an object gets pruned from either n1 or n2. so ideally i should get a storage not configured exception which does not happen.
The point is the moment is say CacheFactory.getCache("Dist:n3") in the cache listener, tangosol does populate the secondary cache by creating an instance of Dist:n3 on either n1 or n2 depending from where the object has been pruned.
from my understanding i dont think we can have a config file on n1 and n2 that does not have a scheme for n3. i tried doing that and got an illegalstate exception.
my next step was to define the Dist:n3 scheme on n1 and n2 with local storage false and have a similar config file on n3 with local-storage for Dist:n3 as true and local storage for the primary cache as false.
can i configure local-storage specific to a cache rather than to a node.
i also have an EJB deployed on weblogic that also entertains a getData request. i.e. this ejb will also check the primary cache and the secondary cache for data. i would have the statement
NamedCahe n3 = CacheFactory.getCache("n3") in the bean as well.

Hi Jigar,
i've three machines n1 , n2 and n3 respectively that
host tangosol. 2 of them act as the primary
distributed cache and the third one acts as the
secondary cache.First, I am curious as to the requirements that drive this configuration setup.
i would like to ensure that the data directly coming
from weblogic should only be distributed across n1
and n2 and NOT n3. for e.g. i do not start an
instance of tangosol on node n3. and an object gets
pruned from either n1 or n2. so ideally i should get
a storage not configured exception which does not
happen.
The point is the moment is say
CacheFactory.getCache("Dist:n3") in the cache
listener, tangosol does populate the secondary cache
by creating an instance of Dist:n3 on either n1 or n2
depending from where the object has been pruned.
from my understanding i dont think we can have a
config file on n1 and n2 that does not have a scheme
for n3. i tried doing that and got an illegalstate
exception.
my next step was to define the Dist:n3 scheme on n1
and n2 with local storage false and have a similar
config file on n3 with local-storage for Dist:n3 as
true and local storage for the primary cache as
false.
can i configure local-storage specific to a cache
rather than to a node.
i also have an EJB deployed on weblogic that also
entertains a getData request. i.e. this ejb will also
check the primary cache and the secondary cache for
data. i would have the statement
NamedCahe n3 = CacheFactory.getCache("n3") in the
bean as well.In this scenario, I would recommend having the "primary" and "secondary" caches on different cache services (i.e. distributed-scheme/service-name). Then you can configure local storage on a service by service basis (i.e. distributed-scheme/local-storage).
Later,
Rob Misek
Tangosol, Inc.

SCCM 2012 R2 Branch Cache - Distributed Cache mode

Hello to all, I understood the process to enabled Branch Cache - Distributed Cache mode in source server and how to enable clients to use it. Fine. I saw a text that states "
BranchCache management is integrated in the Configuration Manager console. For applications, you can configure BranchCache on a deployment type. For programs and software updates, you can configure the BranchCache settings on the deployment.
Does it mean that I also need to configure Branch Chache individually for applications, programs and updates so they can take advantage of it? If positive, how to do this "specific" configuration?
Regards, EEOC.

The BranchCache option is checked by default, so you would only need to disable it for any deployments where you didn't want this functionality.
You can't enable BranchCache for Task Sequences though - but we have a script for that :-)
http://2pintsoftware.com/branchcache-enable-task-sequences-sccm/
Phil Wilcock http://2pintsoftware.com @2pintsoftware

Distributed Cache Mode With W2k8 Enterprise ServerCore ???

Hi, can someone teach me how to configure BranchCache in Distributed Cache Mode with W2k8 Enterprise ServerCore? tks a lot!

Hi,
Since Server Core installation provides a minimal environment for running specific server roles, which reduces the maintenance and management requirements and the attack surface for those server
roles, so the installation process of BranchCache Distributed Cache Mode is the same as the Windows Server 2008 with GUI. Since there isn’t any official document about this, I suggest we could use the following guides as reference.
BranchCache Distributed Cache Mode Step by Step Guide
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=5772
Here are some articles about how to configure a Server Core installation, they may be useful to us.
Configuring a Server Core installation: Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee441257(v=ws.10).aspx
Installing a server role on a server running a Server Core installation of Windows Server 2008: Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee441263(v=ws.10).aspx
Installing Windows Features on a server running a Server Core installation of Windows Server 2008: Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee441259(v=ws.10).aspx
If you face some issue during the configuration, please do not hesitate to let me know, I will be very happy to help.
Best Regards,
Andy Qi
Andy Qi
TechNet Community Support

Solution deployment fails instead of deploying user having a Sys Admin Role

Hi All,
We recently upgraded to CRM 2015 online and face deployment issue every time we try to deploy our solutions. Log file says "RetrievePrivilegeForUser failed - no roles are assigned to user" and this happens to be on a business rule for an
entity where we are just hiding and setting some fields value.
Did any one face the same issue during the deployment? If so, can u help me in resolving the same.
Regards,
Chaitanya
Chaitanya N

I know this post is a couple months old but for future reference:
The problem is with /etc/hosts.allow
You need to add
httpd: ALL
Once you all that youll have external access to your apache setup.

Do SharePoint 2013 Online have Distributed Cache?

Do SharePoint 2013 Online have Distributed Cache?

yes, it is. but what you want to know about Online & DC? are you planning any solution for it?
Not available to SharePoint Online customers. SharePoint Server 2013 customers can use the Distributed Cache service to
cache feature functionality, which improves authentication, newsfeed, OneNote client access, security trimming, and page load performance.
check this:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/sharepoint-online-it-professional-service-description.aspx
Please remember to mark your question as answered &Vote helpful,if this solves/helps your problem. ****************************************************************************************** Thanks -WS MCITP(SharePoint 2010, 2013) Blog: http://wscheema.com/blog

Recieved error during Solution Manager EHP1 Java Components installation.

I successfully installed EHP1 ABAP components but I'm have a problem with the Java components. I recieved the following error. Import aborted during ADSSAP02_0-20002778.SCA
Feb 20, 2009 3:17:59 PM Error: Aborted: development component 'DocumentServicesLicenseManager'/'com.adobe'/'Adobe Systems'/'802.20071213024549.437972'/'1', grouped by software component 'ADSSAP'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'1000.7.01.2.0.20080930104634''/'1':
Caught exception during application deployment from SAP J2EE Engine's deploy service:
java.rmi.RemoteException: Cannot deploy application com.adobe/DocumentServicesLicenseManager..
Reason: Exception during generation of components of application com.adobe/DocumentServicesLicenseManager in container EJBContainer.; nested exception is:
com.sap.engine.services.deploy.exceptions.ServerDeploymentException: Exception during generation of components of application com.adobe/DocumentServicesLicenseManager in container EJBContainer.
(message ID: com.sap.sdm.serverext.servertype.inqmy.extern.EngineApplOnlineDeployerImpl.performAction(DeploymentActionTypes).REMEXC)
Feb 20, 2009 3:17:59 PM Info: Starting to save the repository
Feb 20, 2009 3:18:01 PM Info: Finished saving the repository
Feb 20, 2009 3:18:01 PM Info: Starting: Update: Selected software component 'ADSSAP'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'1000.7.01.2.0.20080930104634''/'1' updates currently deployed software component 'ADSSAP'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'1000.7.00.16.0.20080610114809''/'0'.
Feb 20, 2009 3:18:01 PM Error: Aborted: software component 'ADSSAP'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'1000.7.01.2.0.20080930104634''/'1':
Failed deployment of SDAs:
development component 'DocumentServicesLicenseManager'/'com.adobe'/'Adobe Systems'/'802.20071213024549.437972'/'1' : aborted
Please, look at error logs above for more information!
Error: Aborted: development component 'DocumentServicesLicenseManager'/'com.adobe'/'Adobe Systems'/'802.200712
13024549.437972'/'1', grouped by software component 'ADSSAP'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'1000.7.01.2.0.20080930104634''/'1':
Caught exception during application deployment from SAP J2EE Engine's deploy service:
java.rmi.RemoteException: Cannot deploy application com.adobe/DocumentServicesLicenseManager..
Reason: Cannot load one of the bean interfaces or the bean class of bean LicenseEJBBean.; nested exception is:
com.sap.engine.services.ejb.exceptions.deployment.EJBXMLParserException: Cannot load one of the bean interfaces or the bean cla
ss of bean LicenseEJBBean.
(message ID: com.sap.sdm.serverext.servertype.inqmy.extern.EngineApplOnlineDeployerImpl.performAction(DeploymentActionTypes).REMEXC)
Feb 20, 2009 11:25:59... Info: Starting to save the repository
Feb 20, 2009 11:26:01... Info: Finished saving the repository
Feb 20, 2009 11:26:01... Info: Starting: Update: Selected software component 'ADSSAP'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'1000.7.01.2.0.20080930104634'
'/'1' updates currently deployed software component 'ADSSAP'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'1000.7.00.16.0.20080610114809''/'0'.
Feb 20, 2009 11:26:01... Error: Aborted: software component 'ADSSAP'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'1000.7.01.2.0.20080930104634''/'1':
Failed deployment of SDAs:
development component 'DocumentServicesLicenseManager'/'com.adobe'/'Adobe Systems'/'802.20071213024549.437972'/'1' : aborted
Edited by: Darrell Kirklen on Feb 23, 2009 5:03 PM

Just resolved problem. While reviewing the sdmlog20090310.log I found
error "java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError?" when I goggled this
error "How do I resolve a java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError? I
found the following solution:
http://support.codegear.com/article/35846 : This exception can occur
when the source is built targeting a JDK that is not supported by the
JDK attempting to run it. In the above example, if the servlet was
built targeting only JDK 1.5, but the web server runs JDK 1.4, the
above exception will occur. Check, Project Properties | Build | Java |
Target VM, and verify that the Target VM indicates a JDK compatibility
that is appropriate for the JDK that is running it. It is recommended
to set this field to 'All Java SDKs' for the most compatibility. The
only reason you would want to specify a particular version is if your
code uses language features that only appear in a particular version of
the JDK, and you want to ensure that users use only a compatible JDK.
Also check, Project Properties | Build | Java | Language Features, and
verify that the Language Features are applicable with JDK that is
running it
A this point I checked the java -version at the os level and it showed
1.5.0_17 we are aware the supported version of java should be 1.4.2_16
our Unix team (Solaris) recently installed new patches and didnu2019t
remember to leave the java version at 1.4.2_16 after their were done.
Once the java version was set back to 1.4.2_16 I was able to complete
the java portion of EHP1 using the JSPM successfully.
Edited by: Darrell Kirklen on Mar 13, 2009 4:37 PM

Distributed Cache service stuck in Starting Provisioning

Hello,
I'm having problem with starting/stopping Distributed Cache service in one of the SharePoint 2013 farm servers. Initially, Distributed Cache was enabled in all the farm servers by default and it was running as a cluster. I wanted to remove it from all hosts
but one (APP server) using below PowerShell commands, which worked fine.
Stop-SPDistributedCacheServiceInstance -Graceful
Remove-SPDistributedCacheServiceInstance
But later I attempted to add the service back to two hosts (WFE servers) using below command and unfortunately one of them got stuck in the process. When I look at the Services on Server from Central Admin, the status says "Starting".
Add-SPDistributedCacheServiceInstance
Also, when I execute below script, the status says "Provisioning".
Get-SPServiceInstance | ? {($_.service.tostring()) -eq "SPDistributedCacheService Name=AppFabricCachingService"} | select Server, Status
I get "cacheHostInfo is null" error when I use "Stop-SPDistributedCacheServiceInstance -Graceful".
I tried below script,
$instanceName ="SPDistributedCacheService Name=AppFabricCachingService"
$serviceInstance = Get-SPServiceInstance | ? {($_.service.tostring()) -eq $instanceName -and ($_.server.name) -eq $env:computername}
$serviceInstance.Unprovision()
$serviceInstance.Delete()
,but it didn't work either, and I got below error.
"SPDistributedCacheServiceInstance", could not be deleted because other objects depend on it. Update all of these dependants to point to null or
different objects and retry this operation. The dependant objects are as follows:
SPServiceInstanceJobDefinition Name=job-service-instance-{GUID}
Has anyone come across this issue? I would appreciate any help.
Thanks!

Hi ,
Are you able to ping the server that is already running Distributed Cache on this server? For example:
ping WFE01
As you are using more than one cache host in your server farm, you must configure the first cache host running the Distributed Cache service to allow Inbound ICMP (ICMPv4) traffic through the firewall.If an administrator removes the first cache host from
the cluster which was configured to allow Inbound ICMP (ICMPv4) traffic through the firewall, you must configure the first server of the new cluster to allow Inbound ICMP (ICMPv4) traffic through the firewall.
You can create a rule to allow the incoming port.
For more information, you can refer to the blog:
http://habaneroconsulting.com/insights/Distributed-Cache-Needs-Ping#.U4_nmPm1a3A
Thanks,
Eric
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers
if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

Distributed cache during solution deployment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for