Dnt want Auto Multiple Ship Costs items for Same Vendor

Hi All,
I have a problem..
In my shipment my header as well as Legs are cost relevant.
And i have given automatic determination of item categories in my shipment costs.
Now the problem is when i have say 2 stages in my route den in my shipment costs
determines 3 line items automatically and gives the same price for all based on the condition
records..
I dont want this to happen coz the charges are the same and paid once only.
My scenario works fine if vendors are diffrent stage wise.
But when the vendor is same for the entire route then this leads to duplication of costs.
Plz any inputs on this.
Rgds

Hello,
Where would I go to set different pricing for the item? We've negotiated different pricing for the same item number at different vendors? Right now the solution addresses only the allocation of product.
With regards to the % split; let's say I set the split to 50/50. The Planners override mrp and create a PO for the full 100pcs to 1 vendor and not the system suggested 50pcs to vendor A and 50pcs to vendor B.
Will the system be able to figure out that the allocation has been ignored and re-adjust? Will MRPto buy 100pcs at vendor B and 0pcs at vendor A?
Or
Will the system only look forward and say "Whatever the next requirement is, I'm splitting the order 50/50 between the 2 vendors"?
Thanks again,
BG

Similar Messages

Multiple APP run's for same vendor

Dear Friends,
I would like to know whether it is possible to do multiple payment proposals for a vendor on same dates.
here is the scenario:
Each business area would like to creat and edit payment proposals for the same dates, for ex: Run date is 1.1.08, next payment date will be 02.01.08 and schedule the actul payment run on say 03.01.08.
The actual payment runs will be processed by different paying coc.ode on 03.1.08
so for a given vendor say we have 2 open items which are due for each business area. I tried giving Business area in free selections .
when I try to create a secong payment proposal system gives me the message saying no payment proposal found for the co.code Message nO.FZ349
Yes it does makes sense to this meesage in the sense system wants to check that no invoice is paid twice by mistake.
But my question is since I am restricting open items by Busines area in the selection parameters itself shouldnt that be considered by system.
Hope I am clear.
Please let me know your inputs on the same.
Points assured for useful replies.
Thanks,
Vamsi

Hi Chandra,
Thanks for your inputs.
When you say that same vendor can be paid more than 1 once in a given day by APP, I belive you meant that once paymnet run has been done we can create another APP process for the same vendor.
Yes I dont see any issues there.
I also have no doubt that we can create multiple payment runs for a given vendor for 2 different co.codes on the same day.
But the issue I have is a case of centralised payment for all regions which are represented by Business areas.
Each region will do business with the same pan india vendor and would like to create thier payment proposals. The payment runs for these proposals will be done by the head office.
while trying to the second payment proposal, thi sis the message:
"Vendor 54 222 is contained in proposal 24.01.2008 SB1; no editing"
Hope I am clear.
Thanks,
Vamsi

Multiple fax/email contacts for same Vendor - How to set it up for Output

Hi All
We have two different plant using same vendor A but their contacts are different.
for example. Plant 1000 has the contact as Rep1 with fax 1 and email1
and Plant 2000 has the contact as Rep 2 with fax 2 and email 2
We would like to send the PO output to corresponding contact persons w.r.t.plant.
in our communication block in vendor master we have standard communication type to only one email address.
Please suggest
Thanks
Sasi

Hi
In vendor master you need to use either vendor subrange or data retension at plant level. It is available in purchasing data additional view. (Check in top menu).
Then you need to have partner function with different ordering address. Because for every vendor subrange or data retension at plant you can have different purcahsing data and partner function.
Read SAP libraray and test in development cycle, it will help you.
Regards
Antony

F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor

Hello,
Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
I understand that there are two places:
FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
Thanks everyone.

Ravi,
Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
Comments please?

Amount splitting for same vendor recon account in MIRO

Hi Gurus.........
I am very new into SAP MM.
I am facing a problem in MIRO. while simulating I am getting 2 line items for same vendor account splitting the total amount to be credited against the vendor.
the miro-simulation is just like following....
A     G/L     Act/Mat/Ast/Vndr                               Procurement Doc     Amount     Cur
S     200010     GR/IR Clearing A/C                                                    1,000,000.00     INR
S     100007     input VAT credit-Non-capital goods                               40,000.00     INR
K     200001     WIN TECHNOLOGIES / 741235 KALYANI          520,000.0-     INR
K     200001     WIN TECHNOLOGIES / 741235 KALYANI          520,000.0-     INR
Please tell me where did I make mistakes.........how can I rectify it..
Thanks in advance...

Hi
This can also be because of document splitting. Can you check whether document splitting is active in your system ?
If yes, these are some examples based on which document splitting can happen
Examples of document splitting characteristics:
·       Profit center
·       Segment
·       Business area
·       Customer field
Thanks !
E.Avudaiappan

Personnel Cost Planning: creating cost item for Org unit

Hi experts,
I am trying to attach a cost item to an org unit by maintaing feature hcp02 but the somehow the cost item applies itself to both org unit and position. Could anyone please let me know the how this can be done?
Thanks

It is extremely difficult to answer your question without knowing all the details of your scenario.
I can briefly explain the scenario I used:
1. I have maintained IT1005 on job level to further distribute this information along the organization structure.
2. First of all i had to run data collection on job level using method "Infotype planned compensation: 1005" and cost item that was a base for other items, e.g. basic salary. System creates records in infotype 5010 "Planning of Pers. Costs" for evaluated jobs.
3. Then I collected cost items for positions using method "Data from related cost planning objects", calculation type A, basis that I previously set up, evaluation path O_O_S_C (I started from head org.unit) and object type source C. I did it for positions to have possibility to adjust cost items on position level using transaction PHCPDCUI - Edit Data, e.g. you can ask managers to review your defaults on position level before staring consolidation on org.unit level.
4. Then you start data collection on org.unit level using cost items on position level. Process similar to step 3 but with different evaluation path and source object.
5. When it's done you run cost planning (PHCPADMN - Manage) using special plan for planning based on OM data.
There are plenty of other scenarios, so can't really give you exact answer on your question, as I don't which scenario you use.

Costing items for material 21000001 in plant 204A without cost element.

Dear Friends,
Kindly suggest solution to below problem,
Costing items for material 21000001 in plant 204A without cost element.
Message no. CK597
Diagnosis
The itemization for material 21000001 in plant 204A contains valuation-relevant items without a cost element.
System Response
The costs of these item(s) cannot be included in the cost component split. This means that there will be inconsistencies between the cost component split and the itemization.
Procedure
Check the log for further system messages for material 21000001 in plant 204A. Correct the error and carry out costing again.
Thanks
Gaurav Chopra

Thanks
The error has been resolved..
In master data itself.
For co-products , the version category was not maintained.
Moreover in BOM,
The items which were coproducts were not Ticked as co product.
Thanks..
Gaurav Chopra

Can i give multiple versions in purchase inforecord for same vendor and mat

can i give multiple versions in purchase info record for same vendor and mat code..is is possible??? plz help me
thanks and regards
Ramesh Reddy(VALLUR)

HI,
No .where you are getting version in purchasing info record ? why you want version ? suppose we put version then where you used that version ?
to get clear picture regarding purchasing info record
check following link
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/75/ee102f55c811d189900000e8322d00/content.htm]
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Multiple web catalog files for same rpd

Is there any way to run multiple web catalog files for same rpd in OBIEE?

Why do you want to do that? Why not merge them into one? You run seperate presentation servers againt the same RPD.
Regards
John
http://obiee101.blogspot.com/

Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor

All SAP Gurus,
Is it possible to have Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor code (where purchasing org and company code is same)?
Regards,

hi,
You can't have more than one because the reconcilation account...Because this is the soul account by which you pay to vendor and send the details to further process to FI dept...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Configuration for consolidated check for same vendor from different company

Hi All,
My company is trying to print a single check for same vendor with same vendor number in multiple company code.
The Automatic payment parameters has all company codes where the vendor is having open items.
But when payment run is carried out and the check is printed, there are more than 1 check printed for the same vendor corresponding to the cleared invoices.
One company is paying for all other companies and still multiple checks are printed.
Can someone help with some lead to resolve this issue.
Points will be assigned for helpful tips and answers.
Thanks alot in advance

Hi,
i understood ur problem so dont worry.... solution is there in sap
while confiqure automatic payment program in FBZP give paying company code payment transaction give company code what check through you want to pay that ....ofter that payment will go through this company code check only
may be this information is useful to you

1099 payments are not combined for same vendor payments

Hi All
I have a question on 1099 reporting.
My issue is that we are running the report in transaction code s_p00_07000134 separately by company code because all these company codes have separate tax ids except few of them which have same tax ids. My client wants to run them (ccodes with same tax ids) together and if there is a same vendor on these company codes . They are being shown on the report separately and the 1099 forms are printing separately.
Cant the system combine the payments for same vendors under different company codes with same tax ids run together/
Please help me..

Hello,
Did you get the answer for this problem? Could you please explain how did you resolve it?
Thanks

Different Pricing Schema in PO and PIR for same vendor and material

Dear Experts,
I am facing an issue related to MM.
I have a vendor and a material under a plant, purchase Org, purchase group.
When we are creating a Purchase Info Record (PIR), it is picking one pricing schema, while when creating PO for same vendor and material, it is picking another different pricing schema.
As per my knowledge, pricing schema in PO is picked as per pricing schema group of Vendor and I believe same applies for PIR as well. I have only one vendor pricing schema group.
Because of this issue, I have to manually key-in condition values in PO for all condition types even though I have maintained a purchase info record.
Please suggest, what can be reason.
Regards,
Praveen

Hi,
Thanks for clearing my doubts.
However, I stuck-up in another issue.
Problem is that condition type- PB00 is linked with almost all pricing schemas.
Hence, I can't change pricing procedure in condition type- PB00.
Also, I can't include all J* related condition types in RM0002 as well.
Hence, if PB00 remains as RM0002 and I maintain my pricing procedure- ZJIMPO to all J* condition types, still I am not able to create PIR for all J* conditions. Error "Condition type J1CV is not in procedure A M RM0002".
How to handle this issue? Please suggest.
Thanks
Praveen

Shipping Costing - Invoice for the FWD Agent

Hello:
I am working with PO, Inbound Deliveries and Shippment in order to assign the import costs to all the items related to the shipment.
I have a concern. I have created a Shipping Cost Document related to a Shipment, This document has a FWD Agent assign.
Is there a way to register the Invoice (MIRO) of the FWD without having a PO created for the service?
I have reviewed that in the MIRO, if I select "Purchase Order /Scheduling Agreement" and at the right I put "Planned Delivery Cost", the system brings the cost of the FWD related to that PO,
The thing is that I want to register the whole cost of the FWD Agent related to a Shipment. So in the MIRO I select "Transportation Service Agent" and select the Shipment N°, but the system is not showing any line items.
My question is, is there an option of registrating the FWD Agent invoice (MIRO), without a PO created and for the whole Shippment?, And if the answer is YES, how?, maybe some configuration is missing.
Thanks in advanced,
Regards,

A freight PO (service PO) is required. When you settle shipment cost document, the service acceptance document is created. This in turn will either add an entry to the already exist service/freight PO or generate a new service/freight PO (depend on how you configure the shipment cost item category). This will allow you to create invoice in MIRO using the shipment document.
The service/freight PO is required because you want to create invoice for the FWD agent. The service/freight PO is just for a specific FWD agent.

Want to change the cost element for a activity type (KP26)

Hi,
I want to change the Allocation cost element for an activity type in KP26. I have already changed the cost element in the activity master data in KL02. Now i want to change it in KP26. I am trying to delete the existing line item in KP26 to create the new line item with the new cost element, but system not allowing to delete the existing one. It throws the error message ""Allocations with XXXXXXX/XXXX (Cost center/Activity type) exist ; deletion not possible". Can someone please help me to change the cost element?
Regards
Dev

Hi Rao and Lalit,
Thanx for you people for helping me. i havin gone doubt here. If i am deleting the existing line in KP26 and create new line with appropriage cost element will it be cause the existing datas? I don't want to go for another activity type, because our process is a complex process exist all over the world in more than 300 company codes. So i want to use the existing activity type but want to change the allocation cost element alone. Is there any possibility to change the cost element alone?
Regards,
Dev

Dnt want Auto Multiple Ship Costs items for Same Vendor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for