Amount splitting for same vendor recon account in MIRO

Hi Gurus.........
I am very new into SAP MM.
I am facing a problem in MIRO. while simulating I am getting 2 line items for same vendor account splitting the total amount to be credited against the vendor.
the miro-simulation is just like following....
A     G/L     Act/Mat/Ast/Vndr                               Procurement Doc     Amount     Cur
S     200010     GR/IR Clearing A/C                                                    1,000,000.00     INR
S     100007     input VAT credit-Non-capital goods                               40,000.00     INR
K     200001     WIN TECHNOLOGIES / 741235 KALYANI          520,000.0-     INR
K     200001     WIN TECHNOLOGIES / 741235 KALYANI          520,000.0-     INR
Please tell me where did I make mistakes.........how can I rectify it..
Thanks in advance...

Hi
This can also be because of document splitting. Can you check whether document splitting is active in your system ?
If yes, these are some examples based on which document splitting can happen
Examples of document splitting characteristics:
·       Profit center
·       Segment
·       Business area
·       Customer field
Thanks !
E.Avudaiappan

Similar Messages

  • Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor

    All SAP Gurus,
    Is it possible to have Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor code (where purchasing org and company code is same)?
    Regards,

    hi,
    You can't have more than one because the reconcilation account...Because this is the soul account by which you pay to vendor and send the details to further process to FI dept...
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Multiple order currency for same vendor

    I have a vendor who supplies me on local currency and also import in foreign currency.
    Since the bank details are same for this vendor, our accounts is not allowing us to create two different vendor codes.
    Is it possible to maintain info.record, contract and purchase order in two different currencies for the same vendor?

    Hi,
    In SAP, you can maintain certain vendor master data at vendor sub-range level in addition to the data maintained at purchase organisation level.
    In Customizing for Logistics General, you can specify whether you wish to maintain VSRs and different data in the vendor master record. Choose Business Partners -> Vendor -> Control Data -> Define Account Groups and Field Selection (Vendors) and select Vendor Sub-Range Relevant/Define Screen Layout Specific to Purchasing Organization.
    If you wish to maintain different data for vendor sub-ranges in the vendor master, you must use an account group that allows Data Retention at VSR level.
    Then goto purchasing data screen of vendor master and choose Extras -> Addl. purchasing data, and select Allow data retention at VSR level.  Now you will see a new button "Vendor Sub-range" by clicking which you can enter a different set of vendor master data including Currency.
    To pick this vendor subrange master data in purchase order, you need to enter the vendor sub-range number in purchase order line item material data tab.  You can also maintain vendor sub-range number in the info.record and contract.

  • FK02 Vendor recon. account greyed out

    FK02 Vendor recon. account greyed out !
    I created Vendor # 346, as soon as I clicked Save, system did not prompt for Recon.   
    Verified with T-Code OB23  "Create Vendor Accounting"        Recon Acct. was @ Display     
    Changed it to Req. Entry
    Refreshed, Log Off, Log on again
    …..Still @ Display only !
    What else am i missing ?

    Ooopss
    Verified with T-Code OB23  "Change Vendor Accounting"     
      Recon Acct. was @ Display
      Changed it to Required Recon Acct. is now Required

  • "No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code" error

    Hi gurus,
    When I try to post casj journal entry in FBCJ below mentioned Error showing please help
    I create Business Transactions ( Revenue and Expenses) in FBCJC2
    Defined no. range in FBCJC1
    Tolrance group for OBA3 created 1 entries blank
    and
    When I post a F-43 (purchase Invioce) same comment showing
    "No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code "
    Thanks
    Srinath

    Hi Srinath,
    Check with the following thread can help you:
    No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code 123..
    Also
    You might want to check the following:
    Configure Vendor-Specific Tolerances
    Define Tolerance Groups for Employees
    Define Tolerances (Customers)
    Search SPRO for these and you will find what you need.
    Kind Regards,
    Fernando Evangelista

  • Error - No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code

    Hi All,
    I'm new to SAP MM. This question has been posted many times but the suggested solutions are not working for me.
    Whatever i'm doing related to amounts (either while invoicing through FB60 or while creating down payment request through F-47), I'm getting error "No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code".
    I have already tried following solutions -
    1.) Created tolerance groups and assigned to company code via tcode OBA3
    2.) Gone to SPRO and assigned 2 tolerance groups to company code (one blank and one created above in Step-1)
    3.) Assigned user-id (as in SAP system) to the respective tolerance group.
    Still I'm getting below error.
    Any inputs on this issue are welcome.

    I dont really know why you mentioned that you are new to MM, as this is related to FI.
    the error message has number  F5 155, the F in the beginning or hte error message number already mentions that it belongs to FInance
    If you use SE91 and lookup the where-used list  for this number then SAP will show you a few programs, in the detail you can see that SAP checks table T043T
    if you then use SM30, enter T043T and click customizing, then SAP takes you to the customizing knot to maintain this table.
    which is: IMG > Financial Accounting > Financial Accounting Global Settings > Document > Line Item >
    ....Define Tolerance Groups for Employees
    ....Assign User/Tolerance Groups

  • No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code 6666

    Hi
    I have made settings in table T043t.but still getting the same error"No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code 6666"
    Please help me out.
    regards

    Hi,
    Please check the following configuration.
    OBA4  Define Tolerance Groups for Employees
    OB57    Assign Users to Tolerance Groups
    Cheers!!
    Andy

  • No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code 123..

    hi.. frnds..
    While doing MIRO, am getting this error: No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code 123..
    can any one resolve this...
    thanks in advance...
    Regards.
    Raghav.KH

    Hi Raghav,
    Use following path,
    SPRO-  Financial Account ()New )   -
    Financial Account   Globlal  settings- Document -   Tolerance Groups -
    ---  Define Tolerance Groups for Employees   and  Assign User/Tolerance Groups
    This should solve your problem
    Thanks and regards
    Gitesh
    Edited by: gitesh mahamuni on Aug 31, 2009 7:17 AM

  • 1099 payments are not combined for same vendor payments

    Hi All
    I have a question on 1099 reporting.
    My issue is that we are running the report in transaction code ‘s_p00_07000134’ separately by company code because all these company codes have separate tax ids except few of them which have same tax ids. My client wants to run them (ccodes with same tax ids) together and if there is a same vendor  on these company codes . They are being shown on the report separately and the 1099 forms are printing separately.
    Can’t the system combine the payments for same vendors under different company codes with same tax ids run together/
    Please help me…..

    Hello,
    Did you get the answer for this problem?  Could you please explain how did you resolve it?
    Thanks

  • Configuration for consolidated check for same vendor from different company

    Hi All,
    My company is trying to print a single check for same vendor with same vendor number in multiple company code.
    The Automatic payment parameters has all company codes where the vendor is having open items.
    But when payment run is carried out and the check is printed, there are more than 1 check printed for the same vendor corresponding to the cleared invoices.
    One company is paying for all other companies and still multiple checks are printed.
    Can someone help with some lead to resolve this issue.
    Points will be assigned for helpful tips and answers.
    Thanks alot in advance

    Hi,
    i understood ur problem so dont worry.... solution is there in sap
    while confiqure automatic payment program in FBZP give paying company code payment transaction give company code what check through you want to pay that ....ofter that payment will go through this company code check only
    may be this information is useful to you

  • Can i give multiple versions in purchase inforecord for same vendor and mat

    can i give multiple versions in purchase info record for same vendor and mat code..is is possible??? plz help me
    thanks and regards
    Ramesh Reddy(VALLUR)

    HI,
    No .where you are getting version in purchasing info record ? why you want version ? suppose we put version then where you used that version ?
    to get clear picture regarding purchasing info record
    check following link
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/75/ee102f55c811d189900000e8322d00/content.htm]
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor

    Hello,
    Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
    I understand that there are two places:
    FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
    Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
    Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
    In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
    I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
    Thanks everyone.

    Ravi,
    Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
    In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
    1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
    2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
    3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
    4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
    Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
    That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
    Comments please?

  • Balance in vendor recon account is not matching with the balance in subsida

    Dear All
    Balance in vendor recon account is not matching with the balance in subsidary ledger, the recons accounts inthe masters have been changed,how do i reconcile them

    Hi Surya,
    check f101 - tab parameter, flag Change recon acct.
    f101 carries out postings or gives you a simple list to determine all the open items with changed recon accounts.
    Best regards
       Horst
    Edited by: HorstRn on Jun 24, 2008 6:22 PM
    By the way.... this is the AM forum... Chance to get a solution is much higher in financials....

  • Balance differences in FBL3N &FS10N for same G/L account

    Hi all,
    I am facing the problem in differences in balances for bothfs10n & fbl3n for same g/l account.This difference not for a single account total 9 accounts are there.what i observed was they started sap in 2000 for some g/l accounts i found balance in fs10n for all 12 periods in the year  2000 but there were no line items.in fbl3n also no balances for 2000 year.but they carry forwarded balance to 2001and so on up to 2007.
    If i go for balances in fs10n and fbl3n as of 2007 the balance is different from fs10n.
    In fs10n when i click on lineitem display in total balance colomn = all items for 01/01/2000 to 31/12/2007 balances in fbl3n.
    when I click on line item in fs10n incumulatibalance colomn <>(is not equal to) all items for 01/01/2000 to 31/12/2007 balances in fbl3n.
    Pls help me on this issue they were starting auditing for 2007 so they found the differences.
    Thanks to all
    Regards
    chandra.

    Dear Chandra,
    Kindly check for inconsistencies, if any through the program SAPF190. This report will help you to know the status. If there are no inconsistencies, please look for the following :
    - "Open item management" or "Line item display" in the G/L
      master check boxes, if handled improperly, read the documentation of the report RFSEPA01.
    - If this is not the reason, another one could be the report SAPF011 which you might not have run for the respective G/L accounts.
    - If this does not help, please ensure if you have activated the New GL functionality. If so, you have to upgrade the Serive Patch levels through required SAP Notes.
    Hope this information helps.
    If all of the above does not help, I suppose, you can raise a ticket with SAP under inconsistencies component.
    Suresh Jayanthi.

  • Different Pricing Schema in PO and PIR for same vendor and material

    Dear Experts,
    I am facing an issue related to MM.
    I have a vendor and a material under a plant, purchase Org, purchase group.
    When we are creating a Purchase Info Record (PIR), it is picking one pricing schema, while when creating PO for same vendor and material, it is picking another different pricing schema.
    As per my knowledge, pricing schema in PO is picked as per pricing schema group of Vendor and I believe same applies for PIR as well. I have only one vendor pricing schema group.
    Because of this issue, I have to manually key-in condition values in PO for all condition types even though I have maintained a purchase info record.
    Please suggest, what can be reason.
    Regards,
    Praveen

    Hi,
    Thanks for clearing my doubts.
    However, I stuck-up in another issue.
    Problem is that condition type- PB00 is linked with almost all pricing schemas.
    Hence, I can't change pricing procedure  in condition type- PB00.
    Also, I can't include all J* related condition types in RM0002 as well.
    Hence, if PB00 remains as RM0002 and I maintain my pricing procedure- ZJIMPO to all J* condition types, still I am not able to create PIR for all J* conditions. Error "Condition type J1CV is not in procedure A M RM0002".
    How to handle this issue? Please suggest.
    Thanks
    Praveen

Maybe you are looking for