Do I need a Gigabit switch?

The Apple Extreme has 4 ports (all gigabit switch) and I'm only using 2 ports. I have two Mac Pro's connected to the ports and using them to record music and transfer files.
If I purchased a Netgear GS-105 gigabit switch and connect it to the Apple Extreme, would it better my network speed, or is the Apple Extreme enough?
Thanks!

I'm sure they meant well, but were not aware that electrically, everything passes through the same point in the router.
If you have the 5 port switch connected to the AirPort Extreme, you have an AirPort Extreme with 6 available LAN ports.
If you disconnect the switch, you have have an AirPort Extreme with 3 LAN ports.
If you subscribe to the theory that simpler is better, then for now, you would want to go with the 3 LAN ports on the AirPort Extreme. If you like the extra flexibility of additional ethernet ports, you could leave the switch connected for use by future additional ethernet devices.

Similar Messages

A 10/100 Router and a gigabit switch...will they get along?

I am setting up my business network between multiple computers. I need gigabit speeds for large file transfers (video, audio, images), but I also need internet connectivity. I was planning on using a simple 10/100 4 port broadband router and a Netgear Prosafe 24 port 10/100/1000 gigabit switch. If I connect the router to the switch, will my network's performance decrease since the router is responsible for assigning ip addresses, or will the switch's gigabit speeds still work within my network (since switches operate using MAC addresses)? Can anyone help me on this one? Thank you!
P.S. --It's also between Mac and Window systems
Powerbook G4 17" Mac OS X (10.4.7)

If the devices plugged into the gig-switch have gigabit ethernet ports, then you will see a speed advantage over 100mbps performance. I have a similar setup, with a 4-port linksys router that is 10/100 and an 8-port linksys gig-switch connected to it. I connect my printer and VOIP adapter directly to the router, since they aren't gig anyway, and connect my other devices to the gigabit switch.

Airport wifi problems with uverse and gigabit switch resolved

I think there is a bug in airport firmware 7.6 with how spanning tree works in addition to problems with the Uverse router. Having an Airport with a uverse 2wire 3801 and gigabit switch will not work. Putting the extreme in NAT mode with DMZ plus behind the uverse resolved the problem.
Network configuration:
Uverse 2wire 3801 router
    3801 provides prioritization for upstream traffic so skype and VoIP work better when doing a lot of stuff on Internet
Airport extreme firmware 7.6
two airport express 802.11n hardwired to extreme. Set up in bridge mode. All access points have same SSID "create a network" to enable roaming. Ignore anything to do with extending a network. firmware 7.6
two gigabit switches
    Netgear GS608 - 8 port gigabit switch
    Trendnet TEG-S80g - 8 port gigabit switch
    100BT 5 port switch - did not figure into problem
Three Uverse set top boxes wired on Ethernet. They have to be wire directly to the 2wire box to work correctly. See: http://forums.att.com/t5/Features-and-How-To/At-amp-t-U-Verse-modem-setup-Airpor t-Extreme/td-p/2300785
However, you need to be careful to place your own PCs and other internet devices on the network created by your gear (airport extreme in your case), but keep AT&T's set top boxes for the IPTV services IN FRONT of your own router - so they remain on AT&T's provided network.
So it would work like this ...
Network 1: 2wire RG (4 lan ports) -> Any Set tops, and to the WAN port on your AirportExtreme
Network 2: Airport Extreme LAN ports -> to any computers or internet devices (but not AT&T set top boxes).
The RG prioritizes the traffic for your Uverse Voice and your Uverse TV ahead of internet data traffic, as it rationalizes data heading out of your home. If you place your own equipment in that equation (like putting AT&T set top boxes behind your Airport Extreme) the performance and function of your AT&T set top boxes could really flake out on you.
Symptom:
    Everything would be working fine, then intermittently all my wifi access points would stop working. ~6,000 ms latency, dropped packets. Ethernet worked fine. Here is an example of my macbook pinging the extreme when associated with the extreme over wifi with a strong signal.
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 23
Request timeout for icmp_seq 24
64 bytes from 192.168.1.64: icmp_seq=25 ttl=255 time=267.051 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 26
Request timeout for icmp_seq 27
Request timeout for icmp_seq 28
64 bytes from 192.168.1.64: icmp_seq=26 ttl=255 time=3402.599 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 30
Request timeout for icmp_seq 31
Request timeout for icmp_seq 32
64 bytes from 192.168.1.64: icmp_seq=30 ttl=255 time=3060.673 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.64: icmp_seq=34 ttl=255 time=24.115 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.64: icmp_seq=35 ttl=255 time=31.056 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.64: icmp_seq=36 ttl=255 time=39.828 ms
Root cause:
    It looks like the 2wire 2801 router has a problem with spanning tree when interoperating with gigabit switches and airports. There is interplay with the airport.
I did not have this problem until the 7.6 airport firmware. I had been using the Netgear hub for about a year with the extreme in bridge mode. I added the Trendnet hub and upgraded airport firmware at the same time which made fault isolation difficult.
Problem recreation:
Set up airport expresses hard wired to extreme
Connect gigabit switch anywhere to network
Everything OK
Dettach one computer from wifi then reattach, then all wifi stops working. It takes a few seconds for the problem to propagate.
Ethernet still works fine
Problem Resolution:
Connect to 2wire with ethernet
Set 2wire route to have subnet as 192.168.2.x
Set extreme in NAT mode behind 2wire. It will complain about double NAT. Override the warning. Set the subnet to 192.168.1.x so you don't have to change any static IP addresses. Note that 2wire uses 192.168.1.254 as default route whereas airport uses 192.168.1.1.
I set DHCP to start at .10 to leave the lower addresses for assigning static IP addresses to computers I want to expose outside the firewall.
Go into firewall settings. Select airport extreme. Select the bottom setting which is "DMZ Plus". When you go into the airport extreme settings, you will now see that it has the uverse public IP address on its WAN port. NAT port mappings work fine on the extreme behind the 2wire router.

Keeping this very short here is a summary of the actual problem and solution to allow your Apple Airport Extreme to run in Bridge mode on the same subnet as your uVerse settop boxes (if your Layer 2 switch is configurable).
Devices: Uverse, Cisco SG300, and Airport Extreme
uVerse uses Multicast to broadcast video streams between the uVerse network to the settop box, and from settop box to settop box.
X number of Multicast Groups are created based on X number of settop boxes you have. You can see the multicast definitions by logging into the webinterface of the iNid. Each settop box is a member and can choose to display a broadcasted TV stream or not.
Multicast membership is setup by the use of ICMP messages for IPv4 (MLD for IPv6). Each of the settop boxes become members of each others multicast group by reporting up to the iNid (MultiCast Proxy).
In an ideal world a layer 2 switch will track these memberships and only forward a broadcast packet to the ports on the switch to which the settop boxes are connected to. The switch would do these via snooping on the ICMP packets. Most switches by default do not do this by default and simply forward the broadcast packett out every one of it's switch ports.
Here in lies the problem. Problem is that the Apple AES doesn’t do ICMP snooping / filtering and floods the wireless network with these broadcast streams.
In order to fix this you must turn on ICMP snooping and filtering on the switch (or buy a switch that does this). I have a Cisco SG300 and list out the configuration below.
Other notes:
Ensure that all Media renderers (settop boxes) and servers are wired directly off the switch and not attached to any of the Airport Express ports. This way no media transverses the Airport (only control point traffic goes through the WiFi - which is fine). Obviously if the IGMP snooping switch sees any client requesting Multicast streaming traffic on the same port as the WAP, it will add that Multicast address to the forwarding table for that port, and then, yes it could get flooded.
Remember, you need to allow some Multicast traffic through your WAP to allow UPnP discovery to work (assuming that you will be using Wireless control points.)
Read the Multicast chapter in the SG 300 switch Admin Guide as it explains things very well.
Setting up multicast on the SG300s using the WebUI:
1. Multicast/Properties/
Tick enable Bridge Multicast Filtering Status for VLAN 1, and
set the Forwarding Method to IP Group Address for both IPv4 & IPv6.
2. Multicast/ IGMP snooping/
Tick enable IGMP snooping status then select and edit the entry and ensure that IGMP querier status is ticked.
It's essential for IGMP snooping to work that there must be at least one active IGMP querier on the network - if more than one is enabled, they will carry out an "election" to decide which one should be active (normally the one with the lowest IP address.)
3. Multicast Router Port
Set whichever port that is connected to the uVerse iNid to Status which means that it the uVerse router connected to this port is the Multicast Router
4. Multicast/ Unregistered Multicast
set all ports to Filtering. (The default is Forwarding.)
There are a lot of other variables within all the above - the defaults are OK, you should probably leave them alone!
In the config file you would then expect to see the above appearing as something like this:
ip igmp snooping
ip igmp snooping vlan 1
ip igmp snooping vlan 1 immediate-leave
interface vlan 1
bridge multicast mode ipv4-group
bridge multicast ipv6 mode ip-group
interface range gi1-10
bridge multicast unregistered filtering
ip igmp snooping vlan 1 querier
ip igmp snooping vlan 1 querier address <IP-Addr>

How do I reuse an E3000 as a wired gigabit switch?

Hi, I'm trying to setup my old e3000 as a wired only unmanaged gigabit switch, I have disabled wifi broadcast, is
there anything else I have to do?.
Do I need to disable NAT and enable RIP? Thanks in advance
Solved!
Go to Solution.

You will need to disable its DHCP server (this basically disables NAT) and adjust its Local/ Router IP address to fit your network. To have the E3000 function as a wired switch, you have to connect it to the main router via its LAN port. For more information, refer to the article below. Follow the instructions on LAN- LAN setup.
Cascading or Connecting a Linksys router to another router

My ethenet LAN slows down when I use a (supposedly) faster gigabit switch.

I am using the latest version Airport router. It is providing our home wireless network, which is working fine. I also have a home ethernet LAN. The Airport is connected to an old, cheap, no-name 100Mb switch. I decided to try a Netgear GS608v3 gigabit switch to see if it would allow faster ethernet LAN (of course I understand that it has no effect whatsoever on the WiFi network). The indicator light for the port where the cable from the Airport plugs into the swich glows yellow, indicating only Mb speed. The indicator lights for the other ports running cables to my wired devices all glow green, indicating a gigabit connection.
When using my web browser, I was expecting that I would not really be able to see any differences, but to my surprise the new Netgear gigabit switch was associated with dramatically SLOWER web page load times. And I mean s-l-o-w. Something is wrong here. It should be as fast or faster. And why is the input from the Airport router indicating only 100mb speed?

the problem is with the Netgear switch for SURE. you can not have packet loss on internal network.
going further:
You can troubleshoot this problem. but will take a while.
using the finder, go to network utility and select your ethernet connection,
on right side you will see Transfer statistics
if send errors or recv errors or collision are being incremented you have a problem between your mac and the switch port, (you can have problem from the switch to the router too).
In order to resolve this problem:
system preference
network
selecet ethernet
select last tab (Ethernet)
configure: manually
set speed to 100baseTX
duplex to full duplex, flow-control.
ok
apply
repeat the ping test
you can reach airport page and check for errors on lan ports.
more one tip: you need use CAT5e cables, read the cable and post the results

Connecting two linksys gigabit switches

Hi,
I just bought a slm2024 (24 port managed Gigbabit switch) to replace an older 100Mbit switch. The old switch had PCs and other switches connected to it. The other switches are EG005W ver. 3. (linksys workgroup 5 port gigabit switches)
With the new slm2024 switch, the PCs have no problems connecting. The problem is the EG005W switches. The port on the slm2024 which connects both switches is dark (the LED is dark - no lights at all). Any thoughts on what is the problem? Do I need to configure something special on the slm2024?
I do have an older 100Mbit switch and if I connect it to the new slm2024 switch, the lights are on and traffic is flowing. It is just the EG005W that does not seem to like being plugged in the gigabit switch. It used to work when plugged in the older 100Mbit switch.
Oh and if I try to plug in two EG005W together, I get the same problem. PCs connected to the 2nd switch cannot communicate out either.
I understand that in the past cross-over cables where needed to connect switches but I thought that new switches no longer require this (even my old 100Mbit switch did not require this for the EG005W to work through it).
Any thoughts on how to fix or debug this?
Thanks for any suggestions.

there shouldn't be any configuration needed on the ports of the SLM2024 because they are already "smart ports"
this could be a possible problem between these 2 devices -- have heard of similar problem before bet. a switch and hub but i have forgotten their model numbers -- you would think that since they came from the same manufacturer you will have an easier set-up but sometimes that's just not the case

Using 2 gigabit switches on Airport Extreme N

I'm really trying to work around the 10/100 LAN ports of the AEn and am using a Gigabit switch in order to allow my GigE Mac Pro, Intel Mac Mini, Macbook and ReadyNAS NV connections to each other (thus maxminizing network transfer speeds).
The problem is I have the ReadyNAS in another room (noise) plus needed to run more wired Ethernet to an Xbox 360. In order to save multiple cable runs, this is how I'm set up:
[ Airport Extreme ] in the office
LAN port hooked to Netgear GigE switch
|
|
[Netgear 8 port GigE switch GS108] in the office
ports hooked to:
- Mac Pro
- Intel Mac Mini
- MacBook
- cable through office wall to laundry room, connected to Dlink 5 port GigE switch
|
== wall to laundry room ====
|
[Dlink 5 port GigE DGS-1005D] in laundry room
- ReadyNAS NV
- Another server Dell PC
- Xbox 360 (via cable through another wall to gym)
Questions:
Does this configuration make each GigE capabale device send data to others at GigE speeds (eg. MacPro to ReadyNAS, MacPro to Mac Mini, etc)?
Is there any latency or collisions caused by this configuration? I just seems to me that the ReadyNAS works much slower when hooked to the other switch vs directly to the Linksys switch but I don't have a formal testing program. Note both switches report they are Jumbo frame compatable and all gigE devices are lighting up as GigE on the switches, and all are connected with cat5e cable.
Thanks...
- Steve
MacPro Mac OS X (10.4.9)

Does this configuration make each GigE
capabale device send data to others at GigE speeds
(eg. MacPro to ReadyNAS, MacPro to Mac Mini,
etc)?
Yes, they are all Gigabit, but if you have multiple transfers going on at once, you are limited to the speed of the backplane of the switch.
Is
there any latency or collisions caused by this
configuration?
Prehaps a crossover cable between the switches would help. In the old days you would have had to do that, but the ports are now figuring it out on their own. It might just be more efficent go by a crossover cable (looks just like a ethernet cable but has one of the internal pairs crossed, I think- that's the idea anyway.)
Many, Many. Mac OS X (10.4.9) Full time tech.

Gigabit Switch

I just picked up a AE Gigabit edition. So far so good. Anyway, on our old network I was using a Netgear Gigabit switch with a Mac Pro and a Brother Laser Printer that was connected to it. The rest of the computers (Powerbooks and Macbooks) were wireless, using the old UFO style Airport (G). Just wondering if I still need to use the network switch or the can new AE Gigabit can balance everything out. Our network activity consists of streaming music via iTunes (air tunes), some large files transfers, email and internet. Any help or suggestions are welcome. Thanks.

You could continue to use the switch and connect it to one of the LAN ports on the AirPort Extreme base station (AEBS).
If you have 3 or less Ethernet devices you could get rid of the switch and connect the devices directly to the AEBS.

Load balancers vs. Gigabit switches + SSL decryptors

Please I would need your suggestions on how best to solve some pressing IDS re-implementation issues. Here is the problem:
We are planning on introducing the next generation IDS. This will replace the current
RealSecure 7.0 sensor deployments. At present, we are using Toplayer load balancers. But with aggregated traffic from the different sources hardly exceeding
470Mb, we think that we are not getting much value with the expensive load balancers. We are in effect, trying to explore the options of using gigabit switches to span
the traffic from different sources; and then feed the sensors with the spanned output.
The questions are?
1. What are the options are available to dispense with the load balancers?
2. If we have to use Cisco gigabit switches, which is the effective type, do we have to use IOS or how do we implement it, i.e. architecture; and do you think it is going to be a good replacement of the load balancers?
3. Is there a middle ground architecture?
4. Also, we are trying to introduce SSL decryptors for Web bound SSL traffic. There are different options out there including using sensors with embedded decryptors (such as McAfee's), using a plugin decryptor like breachview and doing termination. What do you think is the best option or are there some other alternatives?
Regards,
Charles Iheagwara

The document Gigabit Campus Design, Configuration, & Recovery Analysis has more information on Cisco gigabit switches that can replace the top layer load balancers.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns340/ns394/ns147/ns17/networking_solutions_white_paper09186a00800a3e0b.shtml

Linksys Cisco SRW248G4P 48-port 10/100 + 4-port Gigabit Switch Help

The switch which is a Linksys Cisco SRW248G4P 48-port 10/100 + 4-port Gigabit Switch, was configured by a contractor which was long ago run off, and the documentation left behind to log into the switch is incorrect. How can we reset this switch so we can configure to the new required settings?
I have attempted to go in through the web browser gui, and no luck logging in via factory default creditials, cannot log in using any of the common admin creditials, nor can we get in via the documented admin name and pw the contractor left.
Attempted ot go in through the console, that doesn't work right at all. Takes 15-20 min before I start even seeing user name or password boxes. Cannot type a single thing into those boxes. I have set the hyperterminal to com1, 38400, 8, none, 1, hardware. It kinda lets me see some of the log in screen, but will not let me type into the username whatsoever.
Logging via web browser I see all the login option but not a single username or pw works. Please if anyone can help, this has been an issue which is now critical.

Hi, My name is Eric Moyers. I am a Network Support Engineer in the Cisco Small Business Support Center.
The settings for connection using Hyperterminal through the Console port should be:
Bits per second: 38400
Databits: 8
Pairity: None
Stop bits: 1
Flow Control: None
When you finish configuring the HyperTerminal, the Login screen appears. The first time you open the Console Interface, use the default username admin and leave the password blank and press the Enter key. You can set a password later from the User and Password Settings screen.The Main Menu screen displays six menu choices: System Configuration Menu, Port Status, Port Configuration, PoE Configuration, Help, and Log Out.
User and Password Settings, IP Configuration, File Management, Restore System Default Settings, Reboot System and Back to Main Menu.
To restore the Switch back to the factory default settings, select Restore System Default Setting and press Enter. A confirmation message appears asking Are you sure? [Y/N]. Press the Y key to continue or the N key to cancel the action.
System Configuration Menu options: (Which is where you will need to go) consist of: System Configuration, Management Settings
After pressing Y, at this point reboot your system and it will be back to Factory Fresh.
If you have any questions or this doesn't work, please let me know. I am attachng the Admin Guide for you as well.
Eric Moyers
Cisco Support Network Engineer
1-866-606-1866

Cisco SGE2010P 48-port Gigabit Switch - Setup & Configure via Web UI?

Hello,
I'm looking to purchase a Cisco SGE2010P 48-port Gigabit Switch (POE) for a 100% Macintosh environment. Because of this, none of the machines will be able to access the switch (including initial, out of the box setup) via the console port. So, I'm wondering if anyone can confirm if this switch is configurable, out of the box, via the Web UI (which would allow a Macintosh system to set it up no problem via a web browser)? I have asked all my suppliers and talked to a Cisco Product Specialist via web chat and also tried via phone, and no one can confirm if this is possible for sure.
The reason I ask is that I was also looking at a Nortel switch and even thought it had a Web UI for management, out of the box it had to be initially set up (ie. configuring the devices IP) via the console port first, and once that was done, only then could you access the Web UI.
I'm hoping this isn't the case with the Cisco switch and that it in fact is out of the box with a default IP so it can be accessed via the Web UI (without the need to go in via the console port).
Could anyone answer this question for me!?
If it helps, this is the website for the switch I'm considering...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9985/index.html
Regards,
Kristin.

SGE2000 and SGE2000P must have a DHCP server to get an IP-address. You “just” have to figure out the address they have been given.SGE2010 and SGE2010P has a default IP (192.168.1.254 – 255.255.255.0)All 4 devises has a web interface. I don’t see why it shut not work with a Mac browser. The primarily reason for buying SGE switches is their ability to stack. But 24 ports (SGE2000/P) and 48 ports (SGE2010/P) switches are not able to stack with each other. They have had several years to fix the problem so it is not likely it will ever bee fixit. If you stick to eater 24 ports ore 48 ports it will work.

Time capsule and gigabit switch

I am planning to expand my wired home network to be able to connect my xbox, blu-ray, tv, and other devices. I am looking at getting a gigabit switch. Any advice on what works best with TC? what's a 'smart switch'? do I need POE? we mainly have MB and MBP in the house.

Since this appears to be a home networking application, all you need is a simple unmanaged powered switch. The GS608 would do all you need and more, likely exceeding the quality of the switch built into the Time Capsule.
If you want to move up into business class switch, but drop down in product appearance, then go with the GS108.
The other switches appear to be managed solutions which require software applications and other associated specialized hardware. Power over Ethernet (PoE) would be of no use unless you happened to already have other PoE products in your network...and no AC outlet for the switch.

4core, mid-'07 Mac Pro not negotiating w/ D-link gigabit switch

I've just bought a D-Link DGS-2205 gigabit ethernet switch. It autonegotiates a gigabit connection with the Windows machine in my house perfectly. With the Mac Pro, however, it just sputters. The autonegotiate eventually leaves the Mac on a 10 Mbps connection. Has anyone else had a problem between their Mac Pros and D-Link gigabit switches? Or at least with the DGS-2205 model?

Same hardware same problem.
I need to reboot the Mac Pro in order to get a gigabit connection.
With the Mac Mini and my old HP P4, no problem.
Seems like a hardware incompatibility.
On the other side the D link 2205 is really cheap compared to other gigabit switches.
No all my stuff is connected in gigabit to my Linksys WRT350, including the Mac Pro.
I only use the D link 2205 as a "portable switch", because there are always meeting rooms or customer's project room where there are not enough ports for all participants.

I am writing to this forum to ask for help in determining whether Aperture will satisfy my needs when I switch from Windows to MAC in the near future.

I am writing to this forum to ask for help in determining whether Aperture will satisfy my needs when I switch from Windows to MAC in the near future.
I am currently using Photoshop Elements 8 on Windows 7. After several years of use, I am self taught and adequately proficient for an amateur. What I didn't realize (until I started researching my upcoming migration on the Internet) is that I actually use PE8 for two functions: digital asset management and digital editing.
Regarding Digital Asset Management: My research leads me to understand that PE on MAC does not provide the same level of organizational capability that I am used to having on Windows, instead providing Adobe's Bridge which does not look very robust. Furthermore, iPhoto, which come on MAC will not support the hierarchical keyword tagging that I require to organize my library of photos. The two SW applications which I am thinking of switching to are either Aperture or Adobe's Lightroom. Frankly, I'm thinking that it would be smoother to stay within the Apple product line.
So the remaining question is whether Aperture will support my digital editing needs. The tweaks that I do to my photos are not very complex (no, I do not want to put people's heads on other animal bodies). But could someone who uses Aperture tell me whether It will allow me to do the following kinds of edits?:
- If I have a photo where someone's face is too shadowed, can I lighten just that person's face, and leave the rest of the photo as-is?
- if I have a photo where the background is cluttered (eg, 2 people in front of the Parthenon which is undergoing renovation), can I remove just the construction cranes?
- Can it splice together several separate photos to give a panoramic?
If, once I get Aperture, I find that it cannot enable the kinds of editing that I do, I would probably get PE11 in the future. However, if people in this forum tell me that Aperture will definitely not support the kinds of editing which I've described in the previous paragraph, I would prefer to get PE11 with my initial configuration (since someone will be helping me with my migration).
Thanks in advance for your consideration and help!

I am concerned, however, about using a non-Apple Digital Asset Manager in OSX. I would really like to avoid integration problems. Is using PE11 to import and catalog my digital photos likely to cause conflicts?
Thanks for any insight on this
Amy,
Not so much conflicts as maybe a little less seamless integration with Apple software and perhaps some third-party software providers in the Mac App Store where some programs build in direct access to iPhoto and Aperture libraries for getting images into those programs easily. Typically, there is a manual command to go to Finder (think Windows Explorer) to browse folders.
One caution to mention however, is that the organization you set-up in PE Organizer is unlikely to transfer over to either iPhoto or Aperture if you decide to change at some point.
The only real stumbling block that I see in your opening comment is that you want hierarchical keywording (Kirby or Léonie can go into the details on keywording limitations as I stay at one level). If you can work with the keywording schemes of either iPhoto or Aperture, then using PE for your external editor (either program supports setting an external editor) would probably be ideal since you know PE well. This is the idea with the Mac App Store version of PE (editor with no organizer).
Note - I use Photoshop CS6 (full version) with Aperture and it works really well. The only downside is that Aperture has to make either a TIFF or PSD file to send to an external editor so that the original file is protected by not sending it to the pixel editor. While TIFF or PSD files protect the integrity of the image information without degrading it, they are typically much larger file sizes on disk than either RAW or JPEG files. Therefore, your library size (iPhoto or Aperture) will balloon quite a bit if you send a lot of files to external editors.
One other possibility for an external editor would be a program called Pixelmator. It is pretty similar to early versions of Photoshop, but built for Mac. Other than the panoramics you want, it will do most pixel editing that PE can do. It is not an organizer, so it is built to go with either iPhoto or Aperture. It does have differences in how you complete certain procedures, so there is bit of a learning curve when you are used to doing it the Adobe way.

New 150/65 only at 94 Download AND Won't Work with Gigabit Switch

I just had this installed today, converting up from the 35/35, and ran into these two problems:
1. The 150 download is only resulting in a 94.87 Mpbs. The installer originally said it must be my PC NIC card, but I do have a GB card, so there's does not appear to be legitimate reason for the shortfall there. I tried to change the link speed and duplex from "auto negotation" to "1 Gbps Full Duplex," but then my computer no longer even could connect.
2. The second issue is that I have always run my connection through a D-Link DGS-2208 Gigabit Switch because I have multiple wired ethernet computers in my office. The installer wanted to test the connection speed directly through my computer (see above) and ran into problems, so I never even tried to revert to my original setup with the switch until he left. However, when I did the Gigabit switch does not even recognize any activity when I plug the source ethernet cord into the switch. It does recognize the connection to the PC and the port is lit, but no lights from connection to the wall.
Any thoughts on what the problems could be? I've included the "additional details" from the Fios Speed test at the standard site (can't get any details from the high speed version):
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
SendBufferSize set to [261360]
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 42.90Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 69.90Mb/s
------ Client System Details ------
OS data: Name = Windows 7, Architecture = x86, Version = 6.1
Java data: Vendor = Oracle Corporation, Version = 1.7.0_05
------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------
Client Receive Window detected at 65340 bytes.
622 Mbps OC-12 link found.
Link set to Full Duplex mode
No network congestion discovered.
Good network cable(s) found
Normal duplex operation found.
Web100 reports the Round trip time = 6.78 msec; the Packet size = 1452 Bytes; and
No packet loss - but packets arrived out-of-order 0.02% of the time
This connection is receiver limited 37.88% of the time.
Increasing the the client's receive buffer (63.0 KB) will improve performance
This connection is sender limited 61.7% of the time.
Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:
RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON
RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON
RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF
RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF
RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF
Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable
Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address
Server says [{edited for privacy}] but Client says [192.168.1.16]
Solved!
Go to Solution.

tdaignault wrote:
I tried to change the link speed and duplex from "auto negotation" to "1 Gbps Full Duplex," but then my computer no longer even could connect.
If your computer can't negotiate a 1Gbps connection, then that is what is limiting you to 94Mbps, which is about right for a "100Mbps" port.
There could be several reasons for this.
A bad NIC
A bad port on the switch
IMO, the most likely cause is a bad cable. 1Gbps requires all 4 pairs in the cable be connected. If only 2 of the 4 pairs are connected correctly, you will get a 100Mbps connect, but will not be able to connect at 1Gbps. Try replacing the cable with one known to work at 1Gbps.

Do I need a Gigabit switch?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for