Do I take the plunge and upgrade to infinity?

Hi all,
After months of the BT wholesale checker saying that Infinity will go live on my phone number by the 31st Decemeber it has finaly been updated to say that it is now available.  However I have some concerns.
Over the past few months I have visited these forums and have seen a great deal of people with issues.  Some are simple and quite nasty.  I'm concerned because I work from home a lot and our family busines whilst not using the internet very heavy does indeed rely on it.  I have heard story's like peoples orders being cancelled and then they are left with no internet what so ever.  For me this would be VERY bad.  For the family business just 3 or 4 days could do damage that would not be reversable.
I have 2 friends who have ordered infinity in the last 3 months in different areas and both had problems, one had the order cancelled saying that even though the checker said he could get it, he's order was cancelled, but they turned everything off a couple of days after the cancelation, his phone and internet where down for around 3 weeks.  My other friend still has major issues and his fault is now being delt with the BT CEO's assistant.
Problem for me is that I want Infinity rather than need it,  Everything works fine on my ADSL connection now wth BT. I get around 5mb down and just under 1mb upload, whilst infinity is not essentual it would be a big bonus in it's upload speed.
I'm itching to order but BT's reputation holds me back.  Any thoughts or personaly experiences to help me make up my mind?
Thanks
Dean.

Yes, don't even think about it. If you can have it, grab it.
I was wary of BT also, but I think they do a pretty good job overall, given they don't directly run the network, thats Openreach. I also figure they should still have greater influence with Openreach than any other ISP. It's also easer to talk to someone at BT than any other ISP I've been with over the years.
The price diff between Total broadband and Infinity option 1 is v. little. Why would you stay with 5M, if you can get 5 to 8 x speed? 5M was great up until last year, but no longer. They are saying Openreach will double infinity speeds to 80M.
I remember moving off dial-up to Broadband(sort of) at 1/4 M, blissful at the time, but laughable now. 
Yes of course some people have had problems, or some initial disatisfaction (myself included), but I wouldn't let that deter you.
I think you would be extremely unfortunate if an Openreach engineer left you without a workable connex of at least 3 times yr current speed. In fact I believe if they can't give you at least 15M they won't put you on Infinity. The first ten days your speed will prob vary quite significantly. You have to let that happen, BT retail will not take any action, until that period has elapsed.
If after 2weeks yr speed is significantly off that BT said, or "promised" - "Contractual Speed" even, as I used to goad BT with, then you have to stamp your foot and be firm. Tell BT to  insist Openreach get on with it, if you have important business traffic, tell them that right at the start. Do not waste time on the Indian call centre after the first time, go straight to Warren Buckley, BT Sales Director via email or twitter, he'll pass yr case to Executive level Complaints who'll put Openreach's nose to the grindstone. Without ELC, I might still be lanquishing on sub 20M, but they got me to my target/contract of 30.7M, now seem to be getting up to 35M.
Having an Openreach engineer set up the system, instead of receiving a new modem in by post and told to do it yourself is good. It's your one opportunity to get info on your situation, such as where yr cabinet is, not ness the nearest one, whether the cable is copper or aluminium (bad news). You also get a new master socket fitted, and if you want it in a diff. room they should do that also, free, gratis.
Great start to the New Year, I reckon.
Bernardo  

Similar Messages

  • Should I take the plunge and upgrade to Snow Leopard?

    I have a MacBook Pro with 2.53 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor and 4GB memory.
    I have just upgraded my printer after the last one died, so now have no real reason stopping me to upgrade to Snow Leopard. The question is though, is there any real good reason to do so?
    With 4GB of RAM I'm probably not going to get any benefit from the 64bit architecture, so I'm wondering whether I'm better off just waiting until the release of OS X 10.7?
    Any thoughts?

    My vote, Upgrade. It is great. Among many other things, the one thing that is noticeable and also impressive is the speed at which everything happens in SL. Way quicker than previous OSs. Also, some apps are upgraded like preview, image capture etc.
    You might want to look at the reviews from last year.
    http://thurly.net/stt
    http://thurly.net/stu

  • Anyone taken the plunge and upgraded to 1.3?

    Just checking to see if anyone has upgraded to Xsan 1.3 and what their experiences have been.
    Im currently running a new installation of 1.2 without without any problems and am considering upgrading.

    I have run into major performance issues with upgrading to xsan 1.3 + os 10.4.6.
    we have 8 xservs re-sharing the san volume, three raids and another two xserve acting as mdc, the meta data network is segregated gigabit and out main network is gigabit.
    our primary application is asr / netrestore, before doing both upgrades we could burn our biggest image on to a mac book pro in about 40~50 minutes now it take over 4 hours. on the same network, same dns, same app but using a xserve with directly attached storage os 10.4.4 a mac book pro will burn in 31 minutes. no other equipment was burning during testing.
    two things that i have noticed, the first and most pertaining was the kernel task on the updated machines was taking 90~100% of one proc (dual proc xserves) where in the past this should be about 17%.
    the other issue is related to large amounts of "inactive" memory. this issue seems to be related to afp sharing of large files i have xserves with 8 gigs of memory and 7 gigs will be inactive (meaning that it was in use but the os is still holding onto it just incase) freshly restart a server the first burn screams. you can also watch activity monitor and see the memory getting used. then it runs out of memory and it starts paging for other applications.
    my next task it to roll back the xsan 1.3 updates to figure out if it is xsan or the os update.

  • Take the Plunge to G5?

    I think I'm ready to take the plunge and buy an iMac G5 (found a very good deal on line). But before I do I need to know a few basics about software and whether much of my current software will be unusable with OS 10.3 or 10.4, in which case replacing the software could make the whole thing too expensive. My question is: with some of the software I now use almost daily (especially Photoshop 4.5, and Microsoft Office 97), will these programs work with OS 10,or does OS 10 require newer versions of these software? Would they work with the "Classic" part of OS 10 if not with OS 10 itself? And is Classic like reverting to OS 9? To move from OS 10 to Classic do you have to reboot or can you make the change while booted up? I know these are very basic questions, but they are ones I will need to know before deciding whether to take the plunge.
    HK

    none of your OS 9 software will work natively in OS X. OS X is an entirely different operating system.
    Photoshop 4.5 is a very old version., so it office 97. They probably could run in the classic environment, but more slowly. You might be better off getting something like photoshop elements and using appleworks (comes with the iMac)
    As for how classic works, you don't have to reboot to use it. OS 9 boots up within a window and then operates in the background. When you use an OS 9 program, it will come up in windows that look like the OS 9. Classic programs won't be able to use access all the features that OS X programs can.
    Where did you find a good deal on the iMac you are considering. Apple controls pricing pretty well, so if its new, its going to cost about the same everywhere. Anything substantially lower that isn't from a regular retailer should be regarded as suspicious. If its used, make sure it comes with the original system disks.

  • About to take the plunge... (?)

    Me = I've got a 3.5 Year Old iMac 7.1, with 2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, with 2GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM, about to install a 4 & a 2 GB of 667 MHz RAM to make it a 6GB system. I also have a 500GB internal ATA HD, and a 500GB External HD.
    For about a year now, I've been doing some modest website publishing with iWeb for my Family etc... Family Tree Website stuff etc...
    I use Reunion Genealogy software as well as iPhoto etc.... I just had to replace my internal HD a couple of weeks ago. Now I am wondering if it's time to take the plunge to Aperture? I have over 4,000 photo's stored on my external that I use and access folders on, and am always updating more etc....
    Can anyone make serious reccomendations for a novice user for Aperture 3.0, or should I skip it altogether until they work out their bugs?
    I have read so many poor reviews....
    I am running Snow Leopard and will not upgrade to Lion until (if) I buy a new Computer....
    Thanks,
    Brian

    2006? Probably the last time I considered using iPhoto.
    In iPhoto, can you:
    Import, name the files with a custom, batch nameing scheme? Such as Creation Date + Custom Text + Numeric Counter?
    Can you store them where you want in folders using the Project/File name you are creating?
    Can you move the master files around and rename them as well?
    These were some of the file management features that kept me from using iPhoto.
    Perhaps there are there now. But when I had looked at it, iPhoto would rename a photo, but you could not change the file's name in Finder. So when you emailed the Photo to someone, it did not have the name you had changed it to in iPhoto.
    Also, what does item #10 mean in the following link?
    http://www.apple.com/aperture/iphoto-to-aperture/

  • Before I take the Plunge ...

    I am about to purchase a Mac-Mini 1.66GHZ Intel Core Duo (2gig RAM) with the Apple 20" Cinema Display.
    Just a few questions before I take the plunge...
    I have been reading endless posts surrounding the GMA950 graphics processor and have a quick question for any Photoshop Users / Digital Photographers.
    Will the GMA950 compliment the quality of the display in regards to image quality. I rely on screen quality for photographic work. I don't want to purchase an expensive display to be let down by the Mini.
    I also run Aperture on my Powerbook (G4 - 2 gig RAM) and intend installing onto the Mac-Mini. Has anyone tried this as the Mac-Mini is not listed in the official system requirements.
    Are any of the Macromedia products (mainly Dreamweaver) Universal apps ....
    My only other daily usage would be i-Life, Office for Mac, internet etc ....
    So the big question is ... will the Mini live up to the task or will I be better suited to an i-Mac ??
    Replies appreciated
    Jason

    I have a mini (and a macbook).
    I use Aperture on my Macbook and for comparison I think the machines are so close I can safely say that the mini can and does run Aperture fine. Yes I understand the GPU is under the specifications of what apple states but they don't prohibit from running.
    Aperture is one of those applications that really relies on the GPU so performance isn't going to be sellar, but I was pleasently surprised in how it did perform. Its usuable and I use Aperture on my Macbook quite a lot. I have a G5 as my main production machine, but the laptop is used to first hold my images and start editting them.
    Here's some Benchmarks that I came across in Macnn. While the test machine is a Macbook, the specifications are so close to the mini you really can gain some knowledge.
    The GMA950 really won't be problem with photoshop, its only 3d rendering and core video that the performance starts lagging (when compared to the higher end GPUs) and as I already mentioned I was pleasantly surprised.
    I typically shoot in RAW mode, Depending on what I'm doing upload 100 to 500 images into Aperture, do some basic exposure, white balancing and other editing before I export the project.
    If your asking would an iMac perform better, well the answer is yes and would your money be better spent on the iMac, I'd also say yes. Would the mini be up to the task, yes it would but you should always go by the old addage, get as much computer as you can afford. The iMac has a superior GPU and you setting youself up for the future better with the iMac.
    Mike

  • Time To Take The Plunge

    Well, thanks to what seems like a nice opportunity, I am about to take the plunge later today and get a Rev B ( 20", 2.0ghz, 250GB) iMac. The opportunity? A large, reliable retailer is relocating one of their branches and discarding some of their display stock.
    I've been offered $250 CAD off the retail price (which, after taxes, comes to about $283 CAD). That to me seems like a bargain considering I'll be getting full warranty and can buy applecare later. I have, of course, confirmed the specs from the box and will be double-checking that the unit inside the box is the same as that described. I will also be trying to see the unit to make sure it's not badly scratched.
    So - in the next couple of hours, I would like the opinions of others. Should there be anything particular I should be asking/looking for prior to handing over my money?
    Thanks in advance.

    Well, in the end I got a total of $300CAD off ($342 after taxes). I'm quite pleased, and setting up the unit at work - I picked it up on my way - it looks perfect. Of course, I'll find out when I turn the thing on at home, but I had to have my co-workers drooling, so I had it set up next to my desk.
    I'll probably copy everything across and buy a wireless router this weekend to take it for a real test run. All I need to do now is find a good source of RAM and then decide between an extra 512 or 1GB chip.
    Oh, Wayne: I got it from London Drugs new store in New Westminster. I had heard from a friend on Monday night that their old New West store was clearing them out, and when I asked on Tuesday, I found out they only had one left. Sweet...

  • When i take a picture with my ipad 2 lets say im looking to the right and i take the picture and when i go to the gallery my face is looking the other way(left)

    when i take a picture with my ipad 2 lets say im looking to the right and i take the picture and when i go to the gallery my face is looking the other way(left)

    The picture in the gallery is correct. The picture you are looking at before you capture it is a mirror image such as you are used to looking at, otherwise you would not be able to handle it.  Look at More Like This >>>>>>>

  • I have 2 apple ID's and one I could not access that had $15 and for some reason it made me create a new apple id, I now have $25 on both accounts. how do I take the money and put it on one account?

    I have 2 apple ID's and one I could not access that had $15 and for some reason it made me create a new apple id, I now have $25 on the new account. How do I take the money and put it on one account? 

    You can't merge Apple IDs.  What you could do is set up your phone to use the same iCloud accout you are using on your Mac.  To do this, go to Settings>iCloud and turn all synced data (Contacts, Calendars, etc.) to Off.  When prompted, choose to keep the data on the phone.  When everything is off, scroll to the bottom and tap Delete Account.  Now add the iCloud account you set up on your Mac (with the same Apple ID) and turn syncing back on for Calendars, Contacts, etc.  When prompted, you will probably want to choose merge, to merge the data on your phone with the existing data on this iCloud account.

  • CS2, I loved it but now after a computer death and a new install on a new PC the registration program won't take the code and continually needs to bee registered, how do I fix it without buying a new version.

    Some time back I was in college and purchased a copy of CS2, I loved it but now after a computer death and a new install on a new PC the registration program won't take the code and continually needs to bee registered, how do I fix it without buying a new version.

    Oh, for Pete's sake, folks!  The forum FAQs state very clearly that posters should always perform a forum search BEFORE POSTING.
    This question has been asked and answered here ad nauseam here.  I'll bet there are dozens of such questions here in the last few months.
    How To Get Help Quickly
    Before you Post:
    Firstly - have you really checked the 'help' option in the program? Many problems can be solved far faster by getting the answer from the Help File.
    Secondly - check the Forum FAQ folder. There's advice there on many common questions and problems
    Thirdly - use the 'Knowledgebase Search' option near the top of this page. Or you can click here to go to the relevant page and enter your search words there - or just search for 'Photoshop' there to see summaries of all the relevant items.

  • I just brought 15-inch macbook pro with retina display for about 3 weeks, will there be any refund or upgrade to my macbook due to the discount and upgraded right now

    I just brought 15-inch macbook pro with retina display for about 3 weeks, will there be any refund or upgrade to my macbook due to the discount and upgraded right now

    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4806203?tstart=0

  • I dropped the phone, but not light ! I tried to start it with the restoration and upgrading but I do not , what can I do

    I dropped the phone, but not light ! I tried to start it with the restoration and upgrading but I do not , what can I do ?

    If you dropped the device and cannot get it to start up, then you have probably damaged it to the point it needs to be looked at by Apple or your Authorized Apple Service Provider, whomever handles service in your location. User damage is not covered under warranty, so be prepared to pay.

  • Over the years and upgrading machines, I now have over 20k of emails in the import mailboxes within several folders. How can I archive these in way so the are still available, if necessary, to search, but don't load and slow down my mail app.

    Over the years and upgrading machines, I now have over 20k of emails in the import mailboxes within several folders. How can I archive these in way so the are still available, if necessary, to search, but don't load and slow down my mail app.

    Ok Thank you.
    I wont worry now.
    Just maybe dig in deep and delete the deleted mails that are still around and that will hopefully clean it up a bit.
    Many thanks for your help and advice.
    Regards
    Chrispl0

  • Why do I still intimidated to take the plunge

    I have asked for some help in the past but frankly I had moved away from using TM because I got overwhelmed. Well I am going to dive into it, but I’m still feeling very intimidated. Please bear with me and do hope that I could get simple, easy way to have a better understanding.
    I am using Leopard with 350G Int. HD, and have 271GB available, that should tell you how little I use the Int. Dr. I only use the Int. DR for my Apps, and a few docs I create. Most of the work I do is working with pictures, RAW, and JPG. I have installed Lightroom but haven’t gone full throttle until I get my workflow in place.
    Consequently, I rely using Ext. HD and this is what I currently have:
    1- 2TB FW HD
    3- 1TB FW HW with 2 partitions. Part 1 Extended (Journaled) 248GB avail
    Part 2 Extended 453GB avail, 228GB used
    I originally partioned this Drive because I used Pt. 1 as a bootable Drive while using Tiger, but since I upgraded to Leopard I deleted the bootable copy. I used SuperDuper.
    4- 500GB Extended (Journaled) 323GB avail, 141GB used not current with all back ups from primary 350GB primary drive.
    5- 350GB Extended currently used as Primary Drive storing. This Drive is almost full there is only 6GB available. There is about 275GB use. So that makes my entire image/data file is about 300GB give or take.
    6- 2 older Internal HDs that I have place inside enclosure since I didn’t want to throw them away but don’t have too much faith since they are pretty old. The are formatted as FAT 32 in order to use them with my XP laptop from time to time so these Drives are more as spare or temporary depository drives.
    Here are my questions:
    1- I have read that both the best way to make TM work is to format the drives as (extended journaled), according to Genius bar, and (extended only). Which is the right way, yes I already ready know about the example that was illustrated in the FAQ Myfiles vs. myfiles but I’m still confused. Keep in mind that I have a major task ahead of me since I need to reformat, delete files etc in order to set up TM, consequently, I’d like to get it right.
    2- I have been thinking using the 1TB DR as the Primary Ext. drive.
    Should the remove the Partition or leave as 2 Partitions
    3- Using the 2TB as the Destination DR to back up a) 1TB DR, as indicated on #1. I am confused trying to figure it how to set up the workflow. Is it better to use SuperDuper or set it as RAID 1 using the App. from the DR manufacturer (Western Digital).
    4- 500GB use it as the destination DR with TM.
    5- I need some suggestion how to best use the 2 older Enclosure Drives.
    No matter what I aware that need to format the Drives, and frankly that is what is making me a bit ambivalent about it. I would appreciate some help thanks, since I am stuck
    Thanks for any assistance

    Pondini wrote
    It's best if all the drives being backed-up, and your TM drive, are the same. But if you have some case-sensitive and some case-ignorant being backed-up, then the TM drive must be case-sensitive.
    Of course, and that's why I'd like to do it the right way. More than likely I will reformatting one Drive at a time. If you said that the Drives must be case-sensitive = Journaled, as you indicated.
    There are many opinions on whether other drives (the ones being backed-up) should be journaled. Apple recommends it, some folks disagree. I'd be inclined to go with Apple, but it's your call.
    And that is the reason why I posted my question since I seen both version being suggested. I assume that by being case-sensitive it means exactly the example that was listed under FAQ,i.e., if I was going to change the name of a file from upper to lower case, which I do from time to time. It's best to format the Drives as Journaled.
    TM will only back up the various flavors of Mac OS Extended.
    Now you got me confused. If previously you stated that TM Drive must be case-sensitive, I remember way back you told me that there are 4 flavors of OS Extended. One of them was Extended(Case Sensitive, Journaled, correct?
    The Partition Map Scheme is also important; it's best if they're all GUID, but Apple Partition Map will also work in most cases. The only major issue is, you can't install OSX or updates to an APM drive attached to an Intel Mac.
    If you have some drives/partitions that are Mac OS Extended, (not journaled), you can, if you want, turn journalling on without reformatting. In Disk Utility, select the partition, then from the Menubar, File > Enable Journaling.
    Please bear with me, you said that it's best all Drives are GUID. I have no idea how to set it up, it sounds that is the best options because Apple Partition Map won't let install OSX updates.
    Yes, I have a 1TB Drive with one Partition with 700GB formatted as Extended (not Journaled) and the other Partition is Extended Journaled 250GB. But here it the thing I am trying to determine if I need to a) formatting the entire Drive without a Partition b) keep both Partitions and then complete the back up by populating the Destination Drive manually.
    The only reason I partitioned the 1TB DR was because I dedicated one Partition as my bootable Drive when my old iMac had a 250GB Internal Drive, but my current iMac has a 350GB Int. Drive; so not sure what to do. Do you think that I could use the same partition when my current Int. Drive has 350GB and the Partition dedicated as bootable Drive has 250GB, keep in mind that I use very little my Int. HD currently I am using only 26GB out of the 350GB.
    Using the 2TB as the Destination DR to back up a) 1TB DR, as indicated on #1. I am confused trying to figure it how to set up the workflow. Is it better to use SuperDuper or set it as RAID 1 using the App. from the DR manufacturer (Western Digital).
    If you're going to use this as your TM drive, it needs to be 2-3 times the size of what you're backing-up. I don't know what you're trying to do with RAID -- please explain.
    It was suggested by WD tech support to use the 2TB DR as RAID ONE or mirror DRive in order to keep a redundant copy on the same Drive in case I lose one data on one of the DR.
    As far as the size of the destination drive I didn't realize that I had to allow 2-3 times the size of the source Drive. Well, that is the case then it sounds that the suggestion made by WD to use the 500GB Drive as the TM destination drive is not the practical one.
    I am now thinking about setting the workflow as follows:
    1TB Drive as Primary Ext Drive and using this Drive as the Source Drive for TM and using the 2TB Drive as the TM Destination Drive, but not sure if I should keep it as a single Drive or mirror, I need some suggestions here.
    But if I won't be using the 500GB DR as the TM Destination DR, so how do I use this DR? I also would like to creating a back up of the 1TB DR using SuperDuper. So does that mean that I need to buy another DR?
    Your internal HD has about 80 gb on it.
    Partition 1 on the 1 TB is not backed-up, right (is/was a clone)?
    Partition 2 on the 1 TB has 228 gb.
    The 500 gb has old backups.
    The 350 has about 275.
    My internal HD has about 27gb and 297GB available
    Partition 1 on the 1 TB is totally empty, previously I kept a bootable copy before I upgraded to new Leopard
    Partition 2 on the 1 TB has about 249GB but is not current the back up so I'm short by 100 GB
    The 500GB yes I have about 325GB of concurrent backup, there still 272GB available
    The 350GB has 273GB and it's almost full. This represents the total amount of data on my Primary Ext DR that I need to back up
    Plus the additional 27GB in the Internal drive
    That totals (80 + 228 + 275) about 580 gb of data to be backed-up.
    And you have 350 + 350 + 500 + 1 tb + 2tb = 4.25 tb of total disk space.
    If that's wrong, please clarify. Then solutions may be fairly obvious.
    My total (26 + 273) about 200GB data to be backed-up, the 228 is duplicate copy
    Basically, in a nutshell all I want is
    1- Have a single primary External HD to save my files images/data
    2- Back up this data using TM using the best Ext. DR from the ones I have, i., 2 TB (not sure if I should set it up as a mirror or a single drive)
    3- Back up the Internal and Ext Primary DR using Superduper. Not sure if I should keep a bootable copy or not
    4- The two older Ext. Drives that are formatted as FAT32 I'll keep them as extra in case of emergency not part of the backup workflow

  • IMac G3 won't boot after updating the firmware and upgrading the OS!

    Hi! Everyone,
    I have an iMac G3 333MHz (five flavors) which comes with 192MB of RAM and 6GB of hard drive. Originally, it was OS 8.5.1 installed, later upgraded to OS 9.2.2. Of course, the firmware has been updated by the appropriate method provided by the on-screen instructions before the installation of 9.2.2. After successfully updating the firmware and installing Mac OS 9.2.2, the system booted up and worked fine. However, after shutting it down and powering it up a few days later, I have encountered a critical problem:
    1. At first, the iMac would chime and displayed a smiley-mac finder face.
    2. No question mark appeared and the system halted because it stayed at the same screen for about 5 minutes! Also, the keyboard wouldn't respond. For instance, the LED signal light wouldn't light on when Caps Lock was pressed.
    3. I assumed that this is just a typical crash and rebooted the machine via the "reset" button on the right side of the machine.
    4. After restarting, well, no luck, the same condition. Therefore, I rebooted it again by using the method mentioned above.
    5. The condition of sticking at the smiley-mac finder face occurred again! However, this time the iMac wouldn't chime and just displayed the mac face.
    6. Another restart, well, it was getting worse... no chime and no smiley-mac finder face but a white screen.
    7. I was frustrated then and shut the machine down forcefully by rebooting it again and pressing on the power bottom quickly before the screen appears. Also, I unplugged the power cord.
    ---------- After a few hours later ----------
    8. Okay, I then plugged the power cord in and booted it up again, this time, it would chime but stuck at the white screen. => No smiley-mac finder face appeared!
    9. Rebooted it again, the result was as same as step 8.
    10. Another restart, the smiley-mac face finally appeared but still... stuck here and this time, no chime.
    11. I then shut the machine forcefully by using the method mentioned above and let the machine rest for about a day with the power cord unplugged.
    ---------- After resting for a day ----------
    12. I booted it up and it would chime, but no screen (the power button was orange, not green). I then forcefully shut down the machine.
    13. Waited for about a minute and powered it up. This time, I tried to clear the PRAM, but no chime and gave me a white screen. => No luck! As mentioned, the keyboard's LED signal light wouldn't light on even though the Caps Lock key has been pressed.
    *Note: The keyboard has been tested on the other computers and it worked. Also, I tried different USB ports to plug the keyboard in. => The USB ports were all in working condition, as I can know from the last successful start up.
    14. Forcefully shut the machine down and tried to enter the Open firmware, no luck. It didn't enter and gave my a white screen.
    15. Conclusion:
    1) After resting for a while, the iMac would chime.
    2) Rebooting too much times would cause the machine not to chime and leaded the screen to become white instead of the smiley-mac finder face.
    3) However, rebooted the machine when the screen became white, the smiley-mac finder face would appear again without chime.
    By the way, I could hear the hard disk spinning up so that means the hard disk is working.
    Can anyone help me solve this problem? Is it related to the firmware update? Any suggestions will be appreciated! Thanks!
    Andy

    OK, I will try replacing the PRAM battery. Also, the PowerMac G3 and the other iMac 233MHz had the dead batteries. They are still working though... Should I replace them along with the iMac 333MHz? In case of not replacing, will they malfunction in future times? There are some symptoms on this two machines: 1. iMac 233MHz - No chime and no sound when adjusting system volume (the bi sound is not available), but iTunes and other applications can still use the audio device and output the sound via internal speakers; 2. PowerMac G3 450MHz - Will chime but sometimes hard to boot: 1) Chime but no screen; 2) No respond after pressing the power button => the power signal light won't light on. Every time I experienced this, I would open its case, pressing a small button (not quite understand what it does... anyway, just works if system halted.) near the PRAM battery and wait for about a minute, then close the case, and it boots. However, I have to reset "Date & Time"...

Maybe you are looking for

  • Putting date and time in a spool file name for output

    I have bee trying to find this answer but don't know where to look: I want to take all or part of the date and/or time to create a unique filename on the fly for a spool file. Can someone point me in the right direction? I am using SQL*Plus.

  • Can I replace a Touchsmart 320 with a 100TDP CPU such as the A8-3850?

    Hello guys, I'm looking for a replacement CPU for my Touchsmart 320 and A8-3800 are not availabe where I reside yet, so I was wondering if it's possible to upgrade it with a A8-3850 CPU, which has a TDP of 100w.... If anyone knows please help me, I d

  • How to move all contacts TO the SIM card on an N97

    I have searched and while some topics exist on taking from the sim card using Nokia Suite, none address my issue of moving contacts from phone memory to the SIM Card. I have the latest N97 and Nokia Suite updates, but I can find no way to write to th

  • Security issues with Firefox

    I am trying to access a web site and I get the insecure website message from Firefox. I know the website is good so I tell them to add exception. When I do that a message comes up that the site doesn't require an exception because they have a valid c

  • Me Account Folders

    When adding new folders in Me Account Mail they append at the bottom rather than alphabetize.  Is there a way to set up preferences so new folders automatically alphabetize?