Do we not send Purchase order acknowledgement IDoc for order cancellation?

Hi all,
Is there a way to NOT send a Purchase order acknowledgement IDoc (POA) when we process an IDoc to cancel the order (or cancel all items)? The system now sends POA whenever there is a order create or order change (including cancellation) IDoc coming in but my customer wants not to receive POA in case of order cancellation.
Thanks,
Charles.

Hi,
Please give me your opinion and if we do not send the order response in case of order cancellation then please tell me how should I configure for that.
Thanks,
Charles.

Similar Messages

The XI does not send messages with correct IDOC structure

SAP XI 3.0 sends to ECC IDOC HRMD_A07
The XI does not send messages with correct IDOC structure.
In XI Design, Software Component RHEVOLU, Ive imported the Objects
HRMD_A.HRMD_A07 from SAP ECC; In Tools -> Export Reduced XSD, I saved
HRMD_A.HRMD_A07.xsd in Namespace http://suezambiental.com.br/HR . At
Message Mapping -> mmAdmissao, in Imported Message -> Import XML or
XSD, I imported the reduced Idoc file generated above, mapping source
fields to target fields.
The IDOC sent from XI to ECC has this structure (template: 22122)
E1PLOGI
E1PORIG
E1PITYP
E1P0000
E1P0001
E1P0002
Status 53 -HR: ALE inbound processing for HR master data
But does not update HR Master data.
The structure expected in ECC side (template: 20376) is:
E1PLOGI
E1PORIG
E1PITYP
E1P0000
E1PITYP
E1P0001
E1PITYP
E1P0002
Status 53 -HR: ALE inbound processing for HR master data
By using WE19 transaction, this structure was changed manually; so, the
HR Master data was updated.
Witch kind of customizing or correction could be made in XI, to send
the correct structure to ECC?
Best Regards
Claudio

Hi Claudio,
In your case, there are perhaps two causes:
1. perhaps when you have import the idoc, for a strange reason, a bad metadata was created by XI. You can clean this one in tcode <b>IDX2</b> (Idoc metadata cache).
2. but it's also probably an error in your Message Mapping. Have you correctly manage segment E1PITYP?
Regards
Mickael

Help needed in inbound IDoc for ORDERS....

Hello all,
I need help in IDoc for ORDERS.. Here is the situation. I have an ORDERS IDoc coming to my SAP system from my customer. When I see the SO it creates.. it says that it has incomplete data.. Information like pricing, inco terms, payment terms. load data, load date etc. is not filled in. How do get those filled automatically.. my customer can not, obviously, give me all the information needed for the SO.. Where do I configure and how?
Thanks,
Charles

Hi,
You can use user exits available in FM IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS to populate additional information.
Also you can use form CUSTOMER_FUNCTION_DYNPRO to populate additional information for BDC screens of VA01. This form is available in FM IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS as well.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto
Please reward points if helpful.

Ipad not sending email, forced to reboot for changes to apply

Hi all
I was asked to look at a friends two week old iPad today.
It was set up for them last week.
Initially the person setting it up tried to add a Gmail account but found that it would receive but not send emails (using the native email app).
They then decided to open an outlook.com account and use that instead of the gmail account.
This worked fine for two days but then error messages saying that the mail could not be sent started to pop up. It struck me that the speed with which the error message appeared after clicking send suggested that this was an iOS issue rather than the server rejecting anything.
I tried to check the imap/smtp settings in the "control panel" but they were not available (read:visible) so I deleted the account and entered the settings manually.
It still wouldn't send emails but this time it didn't throw up any error messages, instead it decided to just dump them in the outbox without notifying me that there was an issue.
Suspecting that the issue was with the ipad rather than the outlook servers, I decided to use my own smtp server details. Initially I tried using SSL but when this too failed I switched to the unsecure version on port 25.
It still wouldn't send anything so I eventually rebooted by holding down the power button until the power off slider appeared. On rebooting I discovered that I could now send emails.
TBH I have no idea if using the different SMTP server will be an issue if they ever want to check their outlook.com "sent mail" on line or not but i do have some questions
1. Why was the reboot necessary? I had closed all open, unnecessary apps by double tapping the home button Might it have been the case that manually entering the outlook.com settings would have worked (given that the ideal set up would be to use the SSL outlook servers).
2. Is this an unresolved iOS7 problem. Google searches resulted in many owners complaining that the iOS7 upgrade had rendered their email accounts incapable of sending emails. TBH the advice given ranged from perhaps sensible to plain daft.
3. can anyone using outlook.com as their email provider on iOS7 confirm which smtp server, port, etc they use?
4. Are there better email apps that actually give you detailed feedback?
i don't know when I will next get the chance to get my hands on their ipad again but I would rather that they were using the correct outgoing servers with encryption (rather than my unencrypted smtp server).
Thanks in advance

neilyoung1 wrote:
For the past few days I am now having trouble sending my client emails. I get them bounced back with a permanent error of retry time exceeded.
This is getting fustrating now as my client is needing answers that I cant give. She is unable to email her colleague in the USA, and I am now unable to email her on a btinternet.com address.
Do BT engineers monitor these forums?
-Neil
Hi again Neil.
Your extra info now to me means that it appears to be problem at the client end!
I hope you don't mind me asking a few questions ....
Is she a regular BT Broadband user with a normal BTinternet email address ? Does she use secondary email addresses ?
Do you know if she can happily email other people ? If not - it could be an account problem which may last a few days ....
If you don't wish to provide the complete bounce message you received, could you perhaps email me the detail (emailing me using my shortcuts). Also pehaps you could ask your client to email me via my shortcuts, and see what happens and I'll take a look at replying to see what happens.
The user on shentel.net domain she's been trying to email, did she ever manage to send any emails initially ? It could be the destination user having a problem.
The mods do monitor these forums, but there are a lot of posts to go through of course ......
http://www.andyweb.co.uk/shortcuts
http://www.andyweb.co.uk/pictures

Safari seems not sending If-Modified-Since header for main address

Not sure I'm in the appropriate forum but let's try (if there is more appropriate one please advise).
When Safari requests a resource (page, image...) to a web server it doesn't provide If-Modified-Since header for the main resource of the request. That means the web server can't answer "resource not modified, use your cache". This is not the behavior of other browsers and not good in terms of performance for the web server as well as for the user.
However Safari sends this If-Modified-Since for the sub-elements of the resource (e.g. images, css in a page...). Which is good.
Is there a way to influence Safari's behavior to provide a If-Modified-Since for the main resource requested to the server?
acama,

Found out the answer. IIS 6 does in fact steal "If-Modified-Since" and "If-None-Match" headers, but only on custom 404 redirects. That's actually what I'm doing here (that'll teach me not to put details in a question when I think they're irrelevant -- actually I just forgot).
Here's two discussions on the issue (they're using ASP, but apparently it's the same for ColdFusion):
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/conversation.aspx?messageid=32839787&threadid=32839787
http://www.webmasterworld.com/microsoft_asp_net/3935439.htm

Not displaying Actual cost Line Items for Order

Hi Gurus,
Recently we did patching from SPC6 to SPC8. After patching we noticed that could not able to see displaying Actual cost Line Items for Order from work order.
System is not throughing error message when I double cline on line item at Plan/Actual Comparison screen in work order cost tab.
We can able to see the same from KB01 with out any problem. I have attached the details.
Could any one suggest me please. Appreciate your thoughts
Regards,
Srini

Hi Paul,
I have implemented this note and get it sorted out.
Thank you for support.
Regards,
Srini

EDI message is not sending to the third party for one particular SA

DearAll,
We have the scenario to send the schedule lines to the third party system. for one particular schedule agreement schedule lines not sending to the third party system.
while processing the messgae it is giving the error as "Message XEDI already processed on 20110317 070042"
What could be the reason?.. we have checked all the EDI settings maintained for this supplier. some two weeks back there is no problem now only getting this message.
how to resolve this?..
Thanks in Advance
Ananth.

Hi Hareesh,
Thanks a lot for the help. I have tried with removing the xml namespace, still the same result. I believe, the problem is with MTs tag in response message structure, bank xml data is trying to map with the response structure in PI, but when its finding the MTs tag I believe then its not mapping, and directly its passing the response in SXMB_MONI without any mapping.
My question is how can I define my response structure without the MTs tagm, I mean same as what I am receiving from bank.
Also I tried with without any mapping in response structure, I mean I used only one Message type for "response from bank" to "response to ECC" , without xml namespace, in this case I am able to receive the response in ECC, but there is exception called "PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA Error during XML => ABAP
conversion: Response Message; CX_ST_MATCH_ELEMENT in " while receiving response, and when I go and see the logs, it says "System expected element 'MT_Response_MT940_Test'" , as its try to match with the defined structure in PI.
Please experts help me, so my question is how can I avoid the MTs tag in my response structure, I just want to define my response structure in PI same as bank is sending me the data in xml tag, without any MTs tag.
Thanks,
Farhan

Inbound IDOC - for Orders Acknowledgement & Orders change Acknowledgement

Hi Gurus,
Using EDI 855 and 865 need to change delivery date and delivery quantity. The quantities must be equal to the original PO quantities.
PO quantity must be splitted to equal the original PO quantity and we need to post the acknowledgements in confirmations tab.
Can you please suggest
Basic type
Out put type
Message type and
process code
to be used to achieve this functionality.
Cheers
Karthik Rali

Hi Yeoh,
can you please suggest Customer exits related to 855 for Inbound processing,for handling
schedule quantity in - Delivery schedule tab.
we need to display the split quantity (Quantity of Goods Received (WEMNG)),
which should be equal to original po quantity (Scheduled Quantity (MENGE)).
with out effecting related condition types/pricing.
Can you please suggest related customer exits ,where i can handle the above functionality.
Cheers,
Karthik Rali

IDOC for Orders

Hello,
Which transaction can I use to set up IDOC creation every time a sales order is created?
Thanks.

Research output detemination. For sales orders, start in SPRO->Sales and Distribution->Basic Functions->Output Control->Output Determination->Output Determination Using the Condition Technique->Maintain Output Determination for Sales Documents

Can receive fax but not send with efax free service for my HP Photosmart 7510

I wetn through the steps but I stiil cannnot send a fax. My internet network is conncected, as well as web service and eprint. I can receive a fax and when I try to send a fax, the pritner tells me that the printer is not connected. I can scan and print with no problems. Please help

Hi @99sackett
Welcome to the HP Support Forums. I understand that you are unable to access the eFax on your Photosmart 7510 printer.
I have included a link to a post by @PrintApper regarding eFax titled eFax users - please read. It has the information regarding the eFax feature.
Regards,
Happytohelp01
Please click on the Thumbs Up on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Please click “Accept as Solution ” on the post that solves your issue to help others find the solution.
I work on behalf of HP

Confirmation Control & Order acknowledgment disappears for a returns order

Hi Friends,
I have a requirement where in I have to update order acknowlegment no in a returns PO.
But as soon as we check the returns indicator at the line item level the Conf Control & Order ack are greyed out. If I uncheck the returns indicatoe they are available for input.
Please let me know why this happens. I have checked in screen layout for ME21N & RL doc type and the fields are maintained as optional entries.
Thanks & Regards,
Narayan.

This is due to fact that Order acknowlegment is not possible in case of return PO.

Why can I not burn purchased tunes to CD for on the go?

Can someone please explain to me why I can't take a song I purchased and burn it to CD so I can enjoy it in the car? I like the idea of owning a iPod, but with children it's cheaper to go with a CD player that starts at 15 bucks than a iPod for 300.
Makes me wonder if an IPod could be offered to this guy...

I've used NeroExpress, Realplayer and Windows Player and it the don't recognize the m4p when I try to add it to my burn list.

Purchase Order Acknowledgement to EBP ( SRM 3.0 ) - Error

When we try to post purchase order acknowledge / response to EBP ( SRM 3.0 ) from XI, we are getting the following error. Please suggest how can we overcome this issue.
<b>Error : Status - 50 : Status set to 50 during IDOC inbound processing ( IDOC Added )</b>
=============
Idoc Type - ORDERS05
System - SRM 3.0
System Id - EBD (Development)
Message Type - ORDRSP
Process Code - ME01 - ME_ORDRSP (Order Acknowledgment)
Requirement : Post the Purchase Order acknowledgment idoc into EBP ( SRM 3.0 ), source file is from Non R/3 system, XI maps the external file as standard idoc format ORDERS05.
Able to send the IDOC file to EBP system successfully. We are unable to process the inbound ORDRSP Idoc in EBP, but we are getting the following error message.
Error : Status - 50 : Status set to 50 during IDOC inbound processing ( IDOC Added )
Please how to overcome this issue or provide me the valid approch to overcome this issue.
Thanks,
Giri

Hi Giri,
you made a mistake in your target format.
ORDERS05/ORDRSP Idoc type is used in R/3, not in SRM.
Depending on your scenario (PO in SRM or in R/3), you will send back the PO Response to SRM or R/3.
- in R/3 use IDOC ORDRSP
- in SRM use FM BBP_BC_POACKNOWLEDGMENT_ADD or similar (Look at provided SRM XI content, you will find the correct entry point in SRM.)
Rgds
Christophe

How to Enter Purchase Order Acknowledgement

Hi All,
I am working on a scenario where I want to send Purchase Order Acknowledge (corresponding Sales Order number)to SRM through XI. My PO is local PO so I want to enter this acknowledgement in EBP.
Can some one please help me out in this scenario.
Thanking You in Advance.
Regards,
Nitin Sawant.

Dear Poster,
As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
Best Regards,
SDN SRM Moderation Team

IORD for sending Order via Idocs

Hi SAP Experts,
Does anybody know how to use T-Code IORD for sending Idocs, every time I run this T-Code not a single Idoc gets created.
Also I would like to know what does 'Status Profile/User status to be set' mean on the selection-screen, I think its happening due to this only.
I've done lots of Idoc Integration using HR Idocs but this is a first Idoc Integration for me in PM module so not sure what should be the best way of sending Order via Idocs to 3rd Party system.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Sunny Thakur

Hi Pete,
We are trying to send SAP PM Work Order for production equipment changes , I came to know that IORD generates Idocs for Order but somehow whenever we try to run this T-Code all the orders are getting rejected. Also I've noticed Idoc Type IORDER cannot be used for sending Delta changes , is it true? I can't find any entry for this message type in BD60 so makes me think SAP did not design this Idoc type for delta changes, even though I know we could customize it
Do you know what should be the best way of sending SAP PM Work Order to external system , should we create one custom Idoc type?
Let me know in case you could help me out.
Thanks,
Sunny Thakur

Do we not send Purchase order acknowledgement IDoc for order cancellation?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for