Document Splitting - Active and Passive

Hi,
What is the difference between active and passive split?? Please explain with an example.
Regards
Satya

Active document splitting means document splitting basing on the Business Transaction/Transaction Variant assigned to the document type and the Item Category assigned to the GL account.  System determines and does the splitting of each line item in the document, basing on the configuration you have done.  You have control over active splitting.
Passive splitting is something that you do not have control over.  System takes the document splitting characteristics from the original document that it is referencing, for example, a reversal document that always references to the original document that is being reversed.  The configuration that you do does not affect passive splitting.
See the following example.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/49/11da8b97244a19e10000000a42189b/content.htm

Similar Messages

  • Authorisation combined with document type, activity and status

    I want to create a role for a user who is only allowed to create and change document type ZDI  in status IW .
    Which object authorization can provided this check ?
    The object authorization C_DRAW_TCD  control only the activity (create/modify) and the document type (ZDI).
    The object authorization C_DRAW_STA control only  the document type (ZDI) and the status of the document (IW).
    But I need the combination of the both authorization. Does a possibility exist in standard to do it without create a client new authorisation?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Amande

    Thanks for your response.
    But it doesn't works as I want.
    The object authorisation C_DRAW_TCS  is checked before the save but not after save with the changed values.
    for example :
    the user has the following authorizations in the modification role:
      C_DRAW_TCS  activity 02 document type ZDI  document status IW 
      C_DRAW_TCD document type ZDI  activity 02
      C_DRAW_STA document type ZDI status IW
    The user has also the autorisation C_DRAW_STA document type ZDI status FI  in the display role
    With this configuration the user can modify the document ZDI in status IW and change the status into FI . I don't want that the user can change the status into FI. Does exist a possibility to avoid this?
    Of course, after storing this change of the status , the user can't access to the document ZDI with status FI.
    SAP doesn't check the authorization C_DRAW_TCS  activity 02 document type ZDI  document status FI  after status change.
    Thanks in advance
    Amande

  • Document Splitting - Bank and Customer Invoice

    Hi Experts,
    I have document splitting method 0000000012 and under that Business transaction 1000 i have created a new transaction variant for the client specific requirment
    Further for this combination i have linked item category 04000 for bank accounts with all categories attached to it and 02000 for Customer accounts with revenue attached to it
    Now when i pass a customer invoice for profit center A and when i clear this using F-28 giving profit center B, the system is inheriting Profit Center A form customer invoice and for the bank line item it is split according to the base row which is Customer invoice hence both item reflects profit center A and profit center B which is keyed in totally ignored
    My client requires that the inheritance from customer invoice needs to be ignored and the profit center needs to be updated as per manual entry. hence the entry should like the following
    Bank Dr Profit center B
       To Customer Cr Profit Center B
    Profit Center Clearing A/c Dr Profit Center A
    To Profit Center Clearing A/c Cr Profit Center B
    I have not given automatically split tick in any of the linked categories
    Please advice

    Hi Expert,
    Go to the below Path: IMG -- Financial Accounting (New) -- General Ledger Accounting (New) -- Business Transactions -- Document Splitting Activate Document Splitting
    Here you need to UN-select the Inheritance Check box.
    Inheritance: Indicator is not set ('UN-Select Check box ')
    Lines can be left without account assignments, even if the document splitting characteristics in the document are unique. Exception: You have set the Standard Account Assignment indicator.
    Inheritance: Indicator is set ('Select Check box ')
    Indicator is set('X')
    If the rule-based document splitting produces lines without account assignments, these lines inherit the document splitting characteristics.
    Regards,
    GK
    SAP

  • Document Splitting purpose and how

    Can anybody explain about the document splitting and its purpose. Please explain it clearly and its configuring to the mail id [email protected]
    it will be thankful

    Hi Murali
    Doc Sent................
    Hope it will helpyou a lot
    Reg

  • Document split activation in FI integration with mm

    Hi Guru's
    my clint want to do document split for FI.If we do so what will be the impact on MM and SD.
    Plz help me if their is any material regading this issue.
    Thanks ,
    With Regards.

    Hi
    What is the document that you are splitting, Usually this is used for splitting of accounting documents of Vendor. Vendor line items are split based on some rules. There is not much implications in MM by using this. Check with Finance.,
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • A/R balance report by Customer by Profit center (Document split activated)

    Dear New-GL gurus
    I activate New-GL splitting.
    For clearing, it seems clearing will be done by not split profit center level.
    Thus, if I’d like to see “A/R balance by Customer by Profit center”, I cannot see.
    (In BSID or BSAD, profit center is blank, but in faglflexa, profit center is entered by document split)
    Is there any report to see it?
    Yoshi

    Hi Yoshi,
    Use mentioned report where you can see PC wise outstanding
    S_AC0_52000887 - Receivables: Profit Center
    Regards
    Mani Kumar

  • MetaData Repository with an active and passive Infrastructure Server

    Are there documentation or has architected where there are 2 infrastructure servers running with OID, SSO, etc, one being passive and the other active connecting to a single repository on a DB server?
    As a side note, the 2 infra servers would be tied to a DNS so if one should fail, the other should show active.
    What were your major hurdles in this implementation?
    Have you had to failover to the passive instance of the Inf server?
    Any insight is greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.

    You have more than one Oracle Release on the Server. hence more than one ORACLE_HOME.
    Check which is your default ORACLE_HOME on the server and check which of the homes PERL5LIB environment variable is pointing from both command prompt and in Windows.
    That could explain the funny bahaviour. If you change ORACLE_HOME, that could help.

  • Active and Passive FTP

    Hi
    I want to setup an Passive FTP and an Active proxy service in Oracle Service Bus 10.3. What is the best way of doing this?
    Regards

    see support note 860423.1
    Oracle Service Bus FTP transport is implemented to use passive mode in proxy services (inbound) and active mode in business services (outbound).
    This behavior can be changed and OSB can be forced to use passive mode for both inbound and outbound FTP requests by applying a patch.

  • Balance Sheet Active and passive side set up

    My client wants the balance sheet as per Indian Standard that Left side Liabilities and Right side Assets how to do that please suggest.
    Regards.

    Hello Syed,
    Thanks for the feedback. I am not quite familiar with the  Indian financial report template, however by my testing, it's possible to list the Liability first in the report and then Assets following. The prerequisite is to set the Liability to Active Group because the system will list the Accounts in Active Group first and this will not affect the amount of relative account. Please test through the above steps to see if this is what you want.
    Regards,
    Xu Zhang
    SAP Business One Forums  Team

  • BOE and document splitting

    Hi,
    We have document splitting activated in our ecc 6 system.  I am trying out Bill of exchange.  While posting f-36,  I am crediting collection charges too.  when simulating,  the debtor acct for collection charges is not picking up profit centre, and i am landing up in profit centre error.  following is the entry:
    DR        s debtors (BOE)  10000  (automatic profit centre thru system)
    Cr        discount charges      100 (profit centre given manually after simulation)
    DR        s debtors (normal)    100 ( no profit centre)
    CR       s debtors (normal) 10000  (automatic profiit centre thru system)
    Error message - balancing field profit centre in line item 3 not filled.
    Please help
    Regards,
    Sadhana

    Hi,
    Check whether note 1249888 is useful for this.
    Regards

  • SRS and Document Splitting

    I have to do some changes in the document splitting configuration, and I know this may be quite risky after go live, so I want to be sure I am choosing the best solution.
    Here is the story:
    My customer is a retailer in Canada, so the sales process is happening in POS and in SRS/SAP.
    They have one GL account for sales discount. This GL account is mapped with the item category cash discount in document splitting.
    For POS, they are using a document type linked with the business transaction 0000, so the system is able to make the splitting. But, for sales from SRS, the document type is mapped with the transaction customer invoice, so the system will never be able to split  using cash discount item category. All the billing documents with discount cannot reach FI, due to the error u201CItem category 40100 in accounting transaction 0200, variant  0001 is not allowedu201D.
    I know that changing the item category is not a solution , since I have many postings on this GL account, and changing the assignment of the business transaction to the document type is also risky ,or maybe even impossible.
    My idea was to create a new GL account for sales discount in SRS (P&L account), map this one with the item category revenue, change the account determination for all the condition types for discount used in SD,  and reprocess all the billing documents already posted, and allow the new ones to create the FI document.
    Please let me know your opinion, or if you see any impact or risks.
    Thanks !

    Hi,
    Check whether note 1249888 is useful for this.
    Regards

  • Document Splitting Error (GLT0002) while clearing Vendor line items by using F-44

    Dear Guru's,
    My client is getting below error while clearing the vendor using T code F-44, I checked related links but i could not find the suitable solution for this issue.
    Doc No: 35112789 has the problem.. i checked Document splitting related Config but it is fine and
    i can see the values in table FAGL_SPLINFO_VAL and not in FAGL_SPLINFO. Please help me to resolve the below issue

    Hi,
    You are getting this error as the document was posted before Document Splitting Activation or was posted when Document Splitting Active was deactivated.
    For the Documents posted before Document Splitting, Migration Cockpit is to be used.
    If there are few documents, then U can take a down time (ensure no document is posted in this time, if posted then you will get same error for the posted documents), remove the tick, clear the documents and Activate Document Splitting.
    Regards,
    Debashri Dutta

  • Deactivation of Document Splitting

    Hi Gurus,
    We are doing are integration testing and having document splitting activated. But now i understood that the design which client is having, profit center is required in Profit and loss items and in balance sheets, profit center is not at all required.
    Can i deactivate document splitting now. I hope it will not having big impact on our cycle (Which included OTC cycle impacting COGS and Revenue accounts). Cost accounts will get profit center from WBS or cost centers. And for revenue account profit center should come from WBS or the defaulted one.
    I hope i am right. Please suggest what can be done.
    Waiting.
    Thank You

    Hello Mohit!
    Yes, you can deactivate document splitting per company code.
    In order to deactivate document splitting use the following transaction:
    SPRO - Financial Accounting (new) - GL Accounting (new) - Business Transactions - Document Splitting - Activate Document Splitting. Then go to tab Deactivation per company code and select the checkbox for those company codes for which you would like to deactivate the document splitting:
    Hope it helps!
    Best regards,
    The Wirtschaftsmann

  • Document Splitting: Assignment of Constant

    Hi Experts,
    We are having an issue with document splitting for Incoming Payments:
    We have configured the following:
    A. Financial Accounting (New) > General Ledger Accounting (New) > Business Transactions > Document Splitting > Edit Constants for Nonassigned Processes
    - Assigned a Default Profit Center to Controlling Area
    B. Financial Accounting (New) > General Ledger Accounting (New) > Business Transactions > Document Splitting > Activate Document Splitting
    - Document Splitting Active for Method 0000000012
    - Inheritance is on 
    - Standard a/c assignment is on, and the constant in A above is assigned  <<<ISSUE>>>
    The F1 Help on the 'Standard a/c assignment' check box states "Do not set this indicator if you have defined it as a required entry field in the activity for defining document splitting characteristics ."
    Profit Center is flagged as required in "defining document splitting characteristics "
    What is the risk of doing the above?
    Posting are as follows:
    1. Post Customer Invoice - Profit Centre is derived from GL line
    Posting Key
    Posting Type
    Profit Centre
    Amount
    01
    Customer
    571305
    100
    50
    GL
    571305
    100
    2. Incoming Payment via Bank Statement - Profit Centre is derived from Constant
    Posting Key
    Posting Type
    Profit Centre
    Amount
    40
    GL Main Bank
    Default from Constant
    100
    50
    GL Sub-Account
    Default from Constant
    100
    3. Posting to Bank Sub A/C and clearing Invoice from Customer - Profit Centre is derived from Customer
    Posting Key
    Posting Type
    Profit Centre
    Amount
    15
    Customer
    571305
    100
    40
    GL Sub-Account
    571305
    100
    4. Clear Bank Sub-Account via SAPF123
    Posting Key
    Posting Type
    Profit Centre
    Amount
    40
    GL Sub-Account
    DocSplit
    100
    50
    GL Sub-Account
    571305
    100
    40
    ZeroBal. Clear Acct
    571305
    100
    50
    ZeroBal. Clear Acct
    DocSplit
    100
    Thanks for your assistance.

    Hi,
    Since you have not provided any profit center during bank statement upload (as it just a posting, not referring any line item), profit center should be derived from either default (FAGL3KEH) or from constant assignment.
    I would suggest to update the profit center through EBS search string (target as 'profit center) based on any reference from bank statement instead of going for a constant only for this scenario. You may refer below link for search string set up.
    Define Search String for Electronic Bank Statement - Bank Accounting - SAP Library
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-30234
    Regards
    Shanid

  • Open items migration for document splitting

    Hi,
    We have done document splitting in 2011, Now all open items before 2011 to be migrated into the new fiscal year (2011).
    Please suggest us how to migrate all the open items into new GL with document splitting activated?
    Eagerly waiting for the reply.
    Thanking you in Adavnce,
    Raghuvir

    Hi Raghuvir,
    There were critical reasons why the split of the open line items of prior years has not provided within the standard migration scenarios.
    The structure and the account assignment information of the already posted documents from the prior years is probably does not satisfy the new document splitting. Therefore it is not possible to split the documents form phase 0 (migration cockpit) based on the new the splitting rules set in the customizing.
    It is also too critical to allow a customer based split in the BAdI since it cannot be garanteed if the sum of split amounts in all the
    currencies still equal the old amount. Furthermore it cannot be traced any more where the split amounts are coming from which would lead to a problems regarding the auditability of the new g/l migration.
    The only possiblity that SAP can offer to the customers is to take over the split amounts from the already existing SL ledgers which have been used before the migration to new g/l.
    I believe that this answer your inquiry. I am sorry that I cannot give you a more positive answer regarding your issue.
    Kind Regards,
    Vanessa.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Adobe Bridge Batch Rename Stopped Working

    ive been using bridge exclusively to rename/ organize my files and today for some odd reason it just will not work. i select the files i wish to rename and then select batch rename and name/numer the files as ive always done before and when i click r

  • Insert a row in master detail view & jboRowKey parameter

    Hi I hava a minor problem. On JSP page I have edit form for master view, beyond edit form is browse of detail view. I would like to insert or edit a row on master view and after update and commit, a would like to stay on the same page to insert some

  • Data pump, Query "1=2" performance?

    Hi guys I am trying to export a schema using data pump however I need no data from a few of the tables since they are irrelevant but I'd still like to have the structure of the table itself along with any constraints and such. I thought of using the

  • Group managed service accounts for SQL Server

    Hey guys, Unfortunately I missed that (g/s)MSAs aren't supported yet for SQL Servers but I'm using them without any worries since ages. As i digged a bit deeper I could find different informations due to the related TechNet entrys. So it seems Micros

  • Message no. F5A047

    Hai! I have created a new tax code for sales and purchase. got it transported while sumilating all the accounts and rates are showing properly but getting an error message as Error exists and see error log. The message number is Message no. F5A047 pl