Does new type of unit testing in Flash Builder4 support ANT task ?

Hi,
I am using the new way of creating unit tests following this page http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flashbuilder/using/WS27ECA937-059A-4308-A2E2-F3A3AAB64337.html #WSF04FE993-D0BA-4a2b-BDF1-8B8ABF22E448, which is really easier and more efficient than old ways.
But I then found that the old ANT task "flexunit" for running unit test not working any more. So if I want to get the results of unit testing from a CI server, how could I do now?
Thanks a lot
Michael

@Michael Lin89 - You can find information on using FlexUnit4 via Ant @ http://docs.flexunit.org/index.php?title=Ant_Task. There has been a lot of information collected on the wiki as well related to the CI process. You can see that info @ http://docs.flexunit.org/index.php?title=Continuous_Integration_Support. There are also an assortment of community projects built to work with FlexUnit which you can check out on the community page @ http://docs.flexunit.org/index.php?title=Community_Projects. There is also a sample project for working with CI, Ant, Maven, and a few other technologies @ http://docs.flexunit.org/index.php?title=CI_Sample_Project_Information.
Hope this helps to fill in the gaps as to what support we offer in terms of Ant and CI.
-Brian

Similar Messages

[svn:osmf:] 14108: Unit test for F4M Subclip support.

Revision: 14108
Revision: 14108
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-02-10 11:37:06 -0800 (Wed, 10 Feb 2010)
Log Message:
Unit test for F4M Subclip support.
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/elements/f4mClasses/TestManifestParser.as

Hello Alex,
I don't have an answer for you.
But, can you try to use http://drmtest2.adobe.com:8080/Content/anonymous.f4v with locally hosted OSMF player? This content doens't require user/pass info.
I'm wondering that Google TV's flash player doesn't support prompt dialog.
http://drmtest2.adobe.com/AccessPlayer/player.html requires flash player 11. That's why it won't be loaded with flash player 10.x.
Thanks,
-- Hiroshi

Flash Builder 4.7 Unit Tests for Mobile Devices

I am trying to setup a simple unit test using Flash Builder 4.7. I created a Test Suite and a Test Case class.
Using the menu, I select Run > Run. I see options to select which Test Case / Methods I'd like to run.
But the strange thing is, next I have to select a launch configuration. I'd assume it would just launch in some console window and give me test results. I did what I could and have it setup to run on the AIR simulator for a XOOM device. Nothing happens I just see a blank screen with a blank bar at the top.
I've also tried right clicking the project and choosing execute flexunit tests. My FlexUnit Resulst still says 0/0.
What is the launch configuration I need to use to execute the test cases and get the results?

I solved it! After looking at example code on google, I realized that the s:ViewNavigatorApplication was missing two key options:
firstView="flexunit.flexui.FlexUnitTestRunnerUIMobile"
firstViewData="{getFirstViewData()}"
Thankfully I was able to derive this. It makes 0 since to me why this wouldn't be added to the automatically generated mxml file but the functions it utalizes does. This to me seems like a defect. If you'd like people to use automatically generated files, make sure they are functional.
Thanks

Better UI for Unit Tests

I've been doing a lot of unit tests lately. Right now I'm working on a code converter Air app and I'm constantly creating unit tests for bugs I'm finding and running them, and debugging them when they don't work. When I debug, it's easiest to isolate the runner to run only one test. I know I can do that by editing the source file and typing in the test name in the core.run call. However, I can't help by think a better UI is needed for doing this form for TestDriven Development.
Basically, what I think would be perfect, is to have the UI, not run the tests initially. It should provide you with a list of tests with checkboxes. Then give you the opportunity to select which ones you want to run, and then run them. It should also have the ability to re-run a test. I realize that for any code changes to take affect you would need to re-run the entire app, but a lot of times, I find myself running the same test over and over and stepping through the code with the debugger in order to figure out what's going on. Then I eventually change the code.
Also, the new UI should persist the last set of selected tests, and maybe have a way to store previous selections. That would make it perfect for how I use it.
Does anyone agree or disagree with this? Has someone done this already?
BTW, the reason I'm using the stand alone runner and not the one in Flash Builder 4 is because I've run into some bugs with the FlexUnit shipped with Flash Builder 4 and there doesn't seem to be a way to get the latest FlexUnit 4.1 to work properly with Flash Builder 4. There seems to be a way to do it with Flash Builder 4.5, but I don't have that version.
Thanks,
Mark

On 05/08/2012 03:56 PM, prakash jv wrote:
> We have been looking for unit test framework for unit testing SWT
> components in our RCP application developed in eclipse galileo 3.5.
>
> We found SWTBot supports the better UI testing and wanted to additional
> details reagrding its support for maven 2.2.1.
>
> Does SWTBot work with projects which are mavenized with maven 2.2.1?
>
> Our aim of adding the unit tests for UI components is for better build
> quality. So we would want these Unit tests to be run everytime we build
> our assembly. As of now we use Junit4 for running our JUnits and they
> run with maven outside eclipse.
>
> Does SWTBot support running the UI unit tests outside eclipse using maven?
Hi
in
http://code.google.com/a/eclipselabs.org/p/emf-components/
we run swtbot tests with maven/tycho
hope this helps
cheers
Lorenzo
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net

Error when running unit tests

Hi,
I'm getting the error 'Marker id <num> not found' about 9 times out of 10 when I try to run unit tests in Flash Builder 4.5 Premium. This is happening on a new (2 weeks old) spark + mx project, with the unit test classes created in Flash Builder using the built-in tools. Using Run As or Debug does not seem to make a difference to whether the error occurs or not. I have to just keep retrying until it runs correctly.
I am using the AS Code Coverage plugin and the FlexUnit 4.1.
Please help as this is driving me mad!
Thanks,
Adam

Here you go. Looks like it shrunk down the libraries image though.

Unit test code problem

I'm doing my first proper unit test and I get an error, think min_size> is the problem
Element type "application" must be followed by either attribute specifications, ">" or "/>".
this generated code
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
             xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
             xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx"min_size>
    <fx:Script>
        <![CDATA[
            import flexUnitTests.serviceTestSuit;
            private var flexUnitTests_serviceTestSuit_obj:flexUnitTests.serviceTestSuit;
        ]]>
    </fx:Script>
    <fx:Declarations>
        
    </fx:Declarations>
</application>

Hi Nikos,
Which Flash Builder build are you using?
FlexUnitApplication.mxml is generated from MXML Application/MXML Windowed Application(Flex/AIR project respectively) file templates configured in Window->Preference->File templates.
Can you take a look at the template if you see any 'min_size' available as part of the template?
However, we are unable to reproduce the issue in the latest builds.
Thanks,
Balaji
http://balajisridhar.wordpress.com

Unit Test component missing after upgrade to 3.2

I recently upgraded (just installed it over the previous version) the sqldeveloper from 3.1 to 3.2.20.09.
Since the new installation the unit test component is missing. After some searches I found that entry in the help/info/enhancements panel:
Oracle SQL Developer - Unit Test oracle.sqldeveloper.unit_test 11.2.0.09.87 Deaktiviert durch Benutzer (=>deactivated by user !?)
It seems as if it was deactivated somehow. I certainly can't remember deactivating any components/enhancements, escpecially not the unit testing framework.
How can I enable it again?

JimSmith wrote:
You should never install a new version over an old version. It always causes problems. The upgrade path as documented in the release notes is ALWAYS to install in a new directory.
Hm... I just double checked the installation guide (http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E35137_01/doc.32/e35119/install.htm#CIHFGGJB) and I can't see a comment that you HAVE TO use a new directory. And even more that reusing the same directory would result in a corrupt installation.
The only thing that it tells me is that IF I want to migrate user settings from a previous release, I need to install it in an empty folder.
To migrate user settings from a previous SQL Developer release:
Unzip the kit for the current release into an empty directory (folder). Do not delete or overwrite the directory into which you unzipped the kit for the previous SQL Developer release.
If I don't want to migrate user settings, then I could install it into the same directory.
Did I overlook something in the installation guide? Maybe there is a documentation gap?
The comment in the release notes is easily overlooked, especially as soon as you start looking though the installation guide. And there the wording could be misleading.
Message was edited by: SvenW.

Unit tests with ant (FB4 beta)?

Since flexunit is integrated with FB4, I was wondering how to run unit tests with ant on FB4 (using 3.4 sdk). In my current ant build file, the <mxmlc> and <compc> tags both work but the tag <flexunit> does not seem to work anymore (it worked on FB3 with flexunit download). So is there anyway currently to run unit tests on FB4 using ant?

Hi,
Let us take your requirements as separate two requriements.
1. Using the flexunit ant task - I think for this you needed a separate ant library to support this. So this may be missing in the ant available with FB. May be you can analyse this and add on your own and try out.
2. Debuggin the results.
Now FlexBuilder has the feature inbuilt as part of the IDE which provides more featuers like , source naviagation, rerunnig , saving results loading results etc.FlexBuilder uses its own set up to show the results details in IDE.
Currently other than using the feature in FB, there is no way to debug the results of the tests. However if you would like to get the tests to be run by ant task, and analyse the results, the following can be used.
Option 1 : Run outside FB, show and analyse results in FB
a. Use the FB, create some sample testCases in FB.
b. Use 'Execute FlexUnit tests' from the run, or debug launcher
c. Use the option Save configuration. This will get the configuration as xml or mxml file. You can use this file template and generate your test cases (may be you will configure your tests in a testSuite class and always use that as the input to the application, so that application syntax never changes). If you run the mxml created swf (whch you can do by the simple ant tasks which does not use the flexunit task ) out side FlexBuilder and if the FlexBuilder is open, you can still see the results in the FB and analyse the results. (You need the library which is used by the FB to use the classes. You can get the location of swc file by inspecting the library path of a project in which you have added the testCase or testSuite class using the FB IDE)
Option2:Run outside FB and Analyse the results in FB.
If you have the project for which you have run the tests, and you have the XML results of the run, you can still analyse the results in the FlexBuilder.
a. Ensure that the report is in the required syntax of FB. (we have tried to use the similar syntax as that of the JUnit resutl report)
b. Use FB, load your project, open the FlexUnit result view, use the open result option in the FB. This should load the XML in FB (we have only ensured to open the result files which were created using FB ,back in the result view. So if you are facing some issue in opening your XML, you can refer the required syntax by saving a sample run result from FB)
Option 3: Run and analyse the results in FB.
a. Have the input setup mentioned to FB. (If you would like to integrate changes, have a suite class which will take care of this and mention in the Execute FlexUnit tests to use this suite class. But there is no way to specify to run the FB commands outside FB.)
b. So whenever you would like to anlyse the tests, you need to run your test in FB and then analyse the results shown in result view.
Please let me know whether this is what you are looking for.
Thanks,
Rani

How to genearte Unit Test reports through ANT/Command line ?

Hi,
I am using sql developer unit test feature to test my database code. I am planning to execute and generate reports by running ant script.
Is it possible to get the unit test results in any format (text,XML,HTML) after running the tests.
How to integrate report generation tasks as part of Automated builds?
Is there any command line utility do through can invoke through ant task?
Thanks,
Fernando

Fernando,
I, too, am looking to run our PL/SQL unit test suites through our automated ant build scripts. Currently, I've only been able to determine that there is a "UtUtil.bat" and "UtUtil.sh" command line utility for win and linux in /sqldeveloper/sqldeveloper/bin. However, it only take three switches:
UtUtil -run ?
UtUtil -imp ?
and
UtUtil -exp ?
While this does provide some limited value to us through automating the importing of our exported test suites and then running them as part of our builds, it doesn't help in running reports on the test runs and exporting the reports to something our build processes can consume (i.e. xml).
Also, we want to be able to run our full db build on (almost) any of our development machines and we don't want to have to have a unit test repository already preconfigured on each development db. I haven't found a utility to automate the creation of the unit test repository user and the repository, and then whena all the test suite runs have finished and the reports run, delete the repository and repository user.
We have used Quest's Code Tester product in the past and it had all of these great features that I am really hoping Oracle can either implement or expose to us.
Regards and best of luck,
Mike Sanchez

Invalid content passes unit test?

I have a unit test for my grammar (following the docs). The test passes with an invalid example; however entering the same example in a runtime instance is handled correctly (i.e. errors shown in the IDE).
Would appreciate any pointers.
Grammar as follows:
grammar spreadsheet.Loader with org.eclipse.xtext.common.Terminals
generate loader "http://www.spreadsheet/Loader"
Specification:
(columns += Column)*;
Column:
'col' name=ID '{'
'header' ':' header=STRING
'type' ':' type=ID
Unit Test:
package spreadsheet.loader.tests
import org.eclipse.xtext.junit4.XtextRunner
import spreadsheet.LoaderInjectorProvider
import org.eclipse.xtext.junit4.InjectWith
import org.junit.runner.RunWith
import com.google.inject.Inject
import org.eclipse.xtext.junit4.util.ParseHelper
import spreadsheet.loader.Specification
import org.junit.Test
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull
@InjectWith(LoaderInjectorProvider)
@RunWith(XtextRunner)
class TestGrammar {
@Inject
ParseHelper<Specification> parser
@Test
def void testParseSpecification() {
val spec = parser.parse(
'''col surname foo {
header: "Surname"
type: String bar
assertNotNull(spec)
val col = spec.columns.head
assertEquals("surname", col.name)
[The "foo" and "bar" tokens should cause parsing to fail].
Thanks.

On 04/08/2015 17:36, Scott Finnie wrote:
> I have a unit test for my grammar (following the docs). The test passes
> with an invalid example; however entering the same example in a runtime
> instance is handled correctly (i.e. errors shown in the IDE).
>
> Would appreciate any pointers.
>
> Grammar as follows:
>
> grammar spreadsheet.Loader with org.eclipse.xtext.common.Terminals
>
> generate loader "http://www.spreadsheet/Loader"
>
> Specification:
> (columns += Column)*;
>
> Column:
> 'col' name=ID '{'
> 'header' ':' header=STRING
> 'type' ':' type=ID
> '}'
> ;
>
>
> Unit Test:
>
>
> package spreadsheet.loader.tests
>
> import org.eclipse.xtext.junit4.XtextRunner
> import spreadsheet.LoaderInjectorProvider
> import org.eclipse.xtext.junit4.InjectWith
> import org.junit.runner.RunWith
> import com.google.inject.Inject
> import org.eclipse.xtext.junit4.util.ParseHelper
> import spreadsheet.loader.Specification
> import org.junit.Test
> import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
> import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull
>
> @InjectWith(LoaderInjectorProvider)
> @RunWith(XtextRunner)
> class TestGrammar {
>
> @Inject
> ParseHelper<Specification> parser
>
> @Test
> def void testParseSpecification() {
> val spec = parser.parse(
> '''col surname foo {
> header: "Surname"
> type: String bar
> }'''
> )
> assertNotNull(spec)
> val col = spec.columns.head
> assertEquals("surname", col.name)
> }
> }
>
>
> [The "foo" and "bar" tokens should cause parsing to fail].
>
> Thanks.
>
Hi
parsing succeeds, and you need to check for errors explicitly: you need a
@Inject extension ValidationTestHelper
and then explicitly check that
for example if you do
spec.assertNoErrors
the test will fail (and show the errors).
You may want to assert a specific error: ValidationTestHelper provides
many assertError methods for that purpose.
hope this helps
Lorenzo
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it
Xtext Book:
http://www.packtpub.com/implementing-domain-specific-languages-with-xtext-and-xtend/book

Class generated by genInterface ant task does not compile

I am trying to build a web service from existing wsdl using genInterface and topDownAssemble ant tasks.
The wsdl contains following type definition. Java class generated from this type (see below) does not compile. The problem is that there are two class members named
'value'. Is this an issue with Web Services Assembly tool or there is some way to get
around it?
<s:simpleType name="quantityType">
<s:restriction base="s:string">
<s:enumeration value="summation"/>
<s:enumeration value="demand"/>
<s:enumeration value="value"/>
<s:enumeration value="consumption"/>
</s:restriction>
</s:simpleType>
// Version = Oracle WebServices (10.1.3.3.0, build 070610.1800.23513)
public class QuantityType implements java.io.Serializable {
private java.lang.String value;
private static final String _summationString = "summation";
private static final String _demandString = "demand";
private static final String _valueString = "value";
private static final String _consumptionString = "consumption";
public static final java.lang.String summation = new java.lang.String(summationString);
public static final java.lang.String demand = new java.lang.String(demandString);
public static final java.lang.String value = new java.lang.String(valueString);
public static final java.lang.String consumption = new java.lang.String(consumptionString);
public static final QuantityType summation = new QuantityType(_summation);
public static final QuantityType demand = new QuantityType(_demand);
public static final QuantityType value = new QuantityType(_value);
public static final QuantityType consumption = new QuantityType(_consumption);
Andrei

Pls set debug attribute of JWSC ant task to true or on, e.g.
<jwsc srcdir="." destdir="${output.dir}" debug="on" keepGenerated="true">
</jwsc>

Flash Builder 4.6 - How can I keep unit test classes out of the finished swc?

I have a library of code I'm building and I'm working on unit testing but I have a major issue. When my finished swc compiles no matter what I do it includes the unit test classes as part of the intellisense if you load the swc via flash. The classes aren't really in the swc since if you just try and import them they'll come up undefined. They only appear to go into the intellisense for the swc. Does anyone know how can I keep this from happening in the finished source? Currently my folder setup is like this in flash builder.
src\main - source documents for the library to get compiled
src\mock - mock class area for unit testing
src\test - unit test classes
In the project Properties panel > the first tab of my Flex Library Build path I have selected only the src\main folder for the classes to inlude in the library. No other folder paths are selected.
The "Flex Library Build Path" doesn't change my results with any setting.
Thanks,

Mel Riffe,
Here's a Help topic about compiler options in Flash Builder: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flashbuilder/using/WSe4e4b720da9dedb524b8220812e5611f28f-7fe7. html
For information on using mxmlc, the application compiler, to compile SWF files from your ActionScript and MXML source files, you can see: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e3d11c0bf69084-7fcc.html
Hope this helps,
Mallika Yelandur
Flash Builder Community Help & Learning
Adobe Systems Incorporated

[svn:osmf:] 11184: Adding new temporal metadata support, including sample app and unit tests.

Revision: 11184
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-10-27 11:08:21 -0700 (Tue, 27 Oct 2009)
Log Message:
Adding new temporal metadata support, including sample app and unit tests.
Added Paths:
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/.actionScriptProperties
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/.flexProperties
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/.project
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/html-template/
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/html-template/AC_OETags.js
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/html-template/history/
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/html-template/history/history.css
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/html-template/history/history.js
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/html-template/history/historyFrame.html
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/html-template/index.template.html
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/html-template/playerProductInstall.swf
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/libs/
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/src/
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/src/CuePointSample.css
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/CuePointSample/src/CuePointSample.mxml
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFramework/org/osmf/metadata/TemporalFacet.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFramework/org/osmf/metadata/TemporalFacetEvent.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFramework/org/osmf/metadata/TemporalIdentifier.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFramework/org/osmf/video/CuePoint.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFramework/org/osmf/video/CuePointType.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFrameworkFlexTest/org/osmf/metadata/TestTemporalFacet.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFrameworkFlexTest/org/osmf/video/TestCuePoint.as

Greg -
    The metadata sample demonstrates how metadata can be placed on an IMediaResource, and used to give the framework more information about the resource. The MediaFactory uses this information to determine which type of media a given resource points to. One of the intial problems we encountered when creating a media factory that created MediaElements from URLResources, was the inability to distinguish between image, video, and audio urls, since the extension isn't a guaranteed way.
The Metadata framework, that was developed last sprint was provided to enable metadata such as XMP, Namevalue, and Cuepoints. Not all specific classes that hold this data haven't been created yet however. The logic to add metadata automatically hasn't been placed in the framework yet.
It's currenty possible to retrieve onPlaystatus, onMetadata, onXMPData, onImagedata, and onCuepoint callbacks:
var videoElement:VideoElement
[After videoElement loads]
videoElement.client.addHandler(NetStreamCodes.ON_XMP_DATA, onXMPData);
function onXMPData(info:Object):void
   //Process XMP here.
Hope this helps.

Coded UI -Unit Test Adapter threw exception: Unable to load one or more of the requested types

I am working on silver light bases share point application using visual studio 2012 with C#
While debugging coded ui tests with ui maps i am getting this error.
I have taken the solution developed by team member containing test methods and trying to debug/run the test methods which contain ui maps I am getting
Unit Test Adapter threw exception: Unable to load one or more of the requested types.Retrieve the loader exceptions property for more information.
When i exclude the tests that depend on ui maps and debug/run remaining test methods I am not getting this error and able to run/debug test methods successfully
But when I include the test methods related to ui maps and tried to debug i am getting this error.
Please help me in this.

Thanks for Fouad's help.
Hi usha.talasila,
>>Unit Test Adapter threw exception: Unable to load one or more of the requested types.Retrieve the loader exceptions property for more information.
Generally this error would be related to the references. Like Fouad's suggestion, you would check whether there are specific references in your test project, and then right click the reference->property, and then set the Copy Local =true.
Best Regards,
Jack
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Flash Builder + unit tests = Unknown error generating output application.xml

Please see my initial forum post here: http://forums.adobe.com/message/3730193
This forum does not let me mark my initial post as "not answered" (re-opened) and it seems the dev is not going to respond to it as-is (maybe because he does not know)... so I'll re-open it this way
An update to my initial post:
I am now seeing this on Flex 4.1 projects as well. Both AIR and Flex Library projects.
It appears to be some kind of race condition. Sometimes unit tests will launch on the first try, other times it takes 4-5 tries. If I keep the unit tests application XML open in the background, even on successful launches I see that the <content> node is re-written to contain the square brackets.

Thanks Sudhir. I had just assumed that you were not getting the notifications since the ticket was marked as "answered".
I appreciate your help in this matter.

Does new type of unit testing in Flash Builder4 support ANT task ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for