Down payments (One recon account mapping to different special recon account

Hi,
       I'm stuck in configuring special gl indicators for down payments for vendors.
we have one recon account for vendor and there are 6 different gl for downpayments.
but the down payment request takes in only one combination of recon and special gl
Ex: U - 20000(A/P) -  14100(Prepayment - Rent)
      T - 20000(A/P) -  14102(Prepayment - Asset)
      M - 20000(A/P) -  14104(Marketing)
I was able to configure special gl indicator for down payments but the down payment request "F" is the same for all the special GL (U,T&M)
when the down payment request is made its show one account for all the special Gl indicator but on payment appropriate its posted in correct account.
This was causing lot of confusion to the user. Please suggest  away to get around this.
Secondly there is Accrued Liabilities  accounts how this should handled.
Thanks for your support
Regards
Kalyan

Hi Dominic,
         It not allowing to create another noted item indicator other than F (Error MSG; Down payments and noted items not possible for special G/L indicator I)
Thanks for your time and support
Regards
Kalyan

Similar Messages

  • One to Many Mapping with different SQL types

    We have an interesting one to many relationship in our system in which the source and target field SQL types do not match, but the values do. The relationship is actually between multiple entries in the same database table. So, imagine we have some table that looks sort of like this:
    KEY ObjectID OwnerNo
    100 1234     0
    101 ABCD     1234
    102 EFGH     1234ObjectID is defined as a varchar type, but Parent entries are guaranteed to have integer value ObjectIDs. Child entries point to the parent through the OwnerNo field, which defined in the database as a numeric.
    A simple one-to-many mapping will give you the following SQL error on execution: [SQL0401] Comparison operator = operands not compatible.
    I tried modifying my descriptor after load as follows:
       public static void modifyOneToMany(Descriptor descriptor)
           ExpressionBuilder builder = new ExpressionBuilder();
           Expression exp = builder.getField("OwnerNo").
              equal(builder.getField("ObjectID").toNumber());
           descriptor.getMappingForAttributeName("children")
              .setSelectionCriteria(exp);
       }But this introduces two problems in the generated SQL ( ... WHERE ((t0.OwnerNo = TO_NUMBER(t0.ObjectID) ... ). First, this generates a where clause using the function TO_NUMBER, which is not supported by DB2 on AS400, our database platform. Second, the table reference is off in the generated SQL--I couldn't find a way to specify that the right hand side of the = operator should be from the parent of the one to many mapping--both sides are referenced from the child context (t0).

    I found the getFunction() method on Expression, so I can solve half of this problem with the following code:
       public static void modifyOneToMany(Descriptor descriptor)
         if (descriptor.getMappingForAttributeName("children").isOneToManyMapping())
           OneToManyMapping map = (OneToManyMapping) descriptor.
                                  getMappingForAttributeName("children");
           DatabaseField objectID= (DatabaseField) map.getSourceKeyFields().get(0);
           DatabaseField ownerNo = (DatabaseField) map.getTargetForeignKeyFields().get(0);
           ExpressionBuilder builder = new ExpressionBuilder();
           Expression exp = builder.getField(ownerNo).getFunction("CHAR").
                            equal(builder.getField(objectID));
           map.setSelectionCriteria(exp);
       }This generates the following where clause:
    ... WHERE ((CHAR(t0.OwnerNo) = t0.ObjectID) ...
    But, I still have two questions:
    1. How do we get the right hand side of this comparison to reference the Parent part of the 1-M mapping?
    2. Since character and numeric conversions are pretty standard SQL functions, is there something wrong with the DB2 database platform I'm using?

  • Country chart of accounts mapping to operational chart of accounts

    Hi All,
    We intend to use country specific chart of accounts to one of our company code along with operational chart of accounts. We try to map 1 operational G/L account to a group of country G/L accounts, system not allowing doing this, understanding it allows only 1:1 mapping.
    Is there any work around to achieve this?
    Requirement at country COA level, G/L accounts should be created and reported by Department: e.g.
    Salary u2013 Finance u2013 600100
    Salary u2013 R/D u2013 600110
    Salary u2013 Marketing u2013 600120
    The same way for couple of P&L accounts to be created, but in operational COA we do have only one expense or revenue account these are used across the globe (all company codes).
    I heard that, it is possible in SPECIAL PURPOSE LEDGER, creating new ledger and assigning the country specific chart of accounts, inputting some validation to achieve this purpose.
    Simulating the purpose, with an example; during posting, where Operational COA G/L ACCOUNT equals to specific COST CENTER check FUNCTIONAL AREA and pick the appropriate country COA G/L ACCOUNT .
    Substitution for Validation; Functional Area = Country Specific G/L Account
    Currently Iu2019m using the mySAP and using New G/L (not document split), would like to achieve the Special Purpose Ledger functionality by creating a new ledger type in New G/L to map country specific chart of accounts to operational chart of accounts (N:1).
    Please share any other alternatives avail to achieve this.
    The reports are needed by functional area,
    Balance sheet by functional area G/L accounts (country specific COA)
    (Figured some difficulty to assign functional area to G/L accounts, though I have cost of sales accounting is activated)
    T/B by functional area G/L accounts (country specific COA)
    Journals by functional area G/L accounts (country specific COA)
    Document line items by functional area G/L accounts (country specific COA)
    Please try to share you thoughts and advice on this.
    Thanks.
    Vyas

    Dear  Vyas,
    We have similar requirement as yours
    Requirement at country COA level, G/L accounts should be created and reported by Department: e.g.
    Salary u2013 Finance u2013 600100
    Salary u2013 R/D u2013 600110
    Salary u2013 Marketing u2013 600120
    I would like to know how are u handling this situation.
    Thanks and Regards
    Anil

  • Using 2 blackberries on the one desktop software - setting up different e-mail accounts on each

    Hi. Can anyone help me please. I have just got a second Blackberry (pearl 8110 blue) my other one being the new Bold.  I want to setup different e-mails on each; how do I do this using the software as I cannot setup the e-mail just using the phone. I have worked out changing device but that's as far as it goes. Thanks
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Bruno1798 wrote:
    Sorry, don't really understand what you mean. I have 2 different accounts from O2. One has blackberry included as part of the service the other is for light use so I have to pay for the blackberry section as I use - it is this latter one that I need to setup a couple of different accounts for.
    You will need the BlackBerry Data Plan on both accounts, including the one you want for "light" use.
    1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
    2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
    3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
    4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
    Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
    BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
    PIN: C0001B7B4   Display/Scan Bar Code
    Knowledge Base Updates
    PIN: C0005A9AA   Display/Scan Bar Code

  • Why is one iphone receiving another iphones(different number, same account) messages?

    iPhone A recieves a text message, and iphone B (which has a different number but on the same account) recieves the same message that was intended for iPhone A. However, when iPhone B recieves a text (intended for iPhone B) iPhone A will not recieve it. This only happend after the new update (IOS 6).

    It can be done, but you will have to sign in to your account on her itunes to updated the apps. Try these instructions:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1848

  • How can i have same billing account with two different game center accounts

    I Need two different game centeraccounts on two different devices thatshare same apple id

    I looked at this post last night and assumed that the OP had decided he did not have a question; however, since you decided to post......
    Mac or iDevice, is forever 'connected' with the AppleID
    actually, that is not correct. It can be wiped and disassociated; it is any OS or app obtained at the app store which is tethered to the Apple ID used to obtain it, not the hardware. See the SLA.
    If a device was tethered forever, it could never be re-sold - obviously.
    As for the OP's question: I am not sure as I could not find any reference in the legal documents available, but I believe it is not possible - one Apple ID = one account.

  • Special GL Accounts

    Hi,
    Can any1 explain why do we use special GL accounts. What kind of special gl accounts exist and how does this concept of special gl accounts works? I know they are used in down payment, are there any other place where special gl accounts are used.
    Thanks,
    shruti

    Hi,
    Let me explain your question in Accounting point of view -
    We know very well the different accounts like, personal, real and nominal. All the real and personal  accounts are shown in the B/s and nominal accounts are in P & L Accounts. Personal Accounts includes Natural persons, legal personalities (like Comapnies, Firms and Association of persons) and also verity type of accounts like outstanding and prepaid accounts.
    In the case of natural and leagal persons we have separate masters (like vendor and creditor, Employees etc.,) but in the case of out standing things we have no separate area which is required. So in SAP these can be treated as Special GL Accounts,
    In Special GLs there are different things are included as follows:
    1 All the out standing (prepaid, Advances Recived) nature items
    2 All the items of trasactions which are treated as Contingetn Liabilities (which can only be shown as Noted items to the Final Accounts)
    3 All the types of items like Guarantees given / Recived to pay or to fulfill the obligations.
    Example for Contingent Liability is .... Say your friend X paid me Rs. 5000 and you given surity specifying that "if your friend fail to pay the amount you will pay me". Then these Rs. 5000 will become a contingent Liability only for you. Because, at present, it is neither Asset for you nor Liability. If your friend pays me promptly, then no liability / obligation on you. Similarly, you will be made liable only if your friend fails to fullfill his obligation. But at current time you cont decide because you dont know that your friend is going to pay me or not.
    Example for BG, -- You entering into an agreement of supply of finished Profuct to your customer. And this dealing with that particular customer is, say, forst time for you. So he need some surity / he demands some security deposit. He need this becasuse, You are the first supplier to him and your finished goods are used his production as raw material and if you not supply properly his dealings with his customers may effect.
    in this case you must deposit amount in a nationalised bank on your customer's name. Absolutely it is an asset for you because cash is flown out side of the organisation and it is kept in favour of Customers.
    So these type of expenses / items need to show separately and nature of these transactions are much differ from that of other transactions. So Special GL is arrainged in SAP to configure all these...
    I hope you may clear now...

  • F-29 Customer down payment, error, system ask for vendor account

    Hello,
    When I enter customer down payment through F-29 I receive message F5243 'Account type K is not defined for document type DZ'.
    If I use other document type, I receive the same message. I DO NOT NEED ACCOUNT TYPE 'VENDOR' HERE. (When I choose with F4 I receive search for CUSTOMER, and special GL also for CUSTOMER.)
    If I change that (and allow acct type 'K'), system issue message F5104 'Vendor not created in CoCode'.
    If, for example I have the same number for vendor and customer (SAME NUMBER, NOT THE SAME COMPANY), system allows me to go further, but takes information for 'Vendor down payment' (made in Customizing).
    I would like to point that there is no link in master date between customer and vendor account.
    My only clue is that something is wrong with this transaction (there is no SAP note for this exact problem, and all other posts on the same subject here on SDN are not resolved)
    Maybe someone has idea about connection of this tcode with logistic...
    PLEASE HELP

    Hi Amina,
    For that u check weather u assign vendor special gl account to customer reconcile account in OBXR.
    Select special gl type  D in OBXR and give the reconcilation account of customer and special gl account
    Regards
    Surya

  • Down Payment Accounts

    Hi everybody,
    following up to my thread "G/L Account Determination - meaning of accounts" I precise my question regarding the down payment accounts in this separate thread.
    I've made several simulations of Down Payment Processes on a demo database (using Down Payment Requests as well as Down Payment Invoices). In order to understand the automatic journal entries created by this two operations together with the posting of incoming payments I recognized that the system only used the Down Payment Clearing Account and the Down Payment Interim Account (taken from the customer's master data) but never used the Down Payment Receivables. My question is under which circumstances the system needs the Down Payment Receivables.
    My second question concerning this is:
    Down Payment Tax Offset Account (Is it a separate tax account for Down Payments - If so It can be theoretically the same account that will be used for output taxes on conventional A/R invoices?)
    Thank you for your help and best regards
    Greg
    Edited by: gregAT on Feb 16, 2012 6:52 PM

    Hi Greg,
    In USA localization, they don't have this account (Gordon already point this out).
    In Indonesia here, we always use Australia / NZ localization and regarding this down payment receivable, we also have this option in Australia / NZ localization. I also have database with Singapore localization, and they have this option also.
    Now, as far as I know, no document posted that will automatically result in journal entry posting to this account. If you're wondering then why this option exist at first place, the answer is this : based on my experience, not every setting in SAP B1 had an impact pertaining to automatic journal. Some of the account setting only serve as a field to contain information, not necessarily related to automatic journal.
    That being said, personally I think this field existed to stored the information if you want to maintain control account for down payment invoice based on this particular customer
    Let me give you an example:
    You have customer = C001 - ABC Company
    You set the Account Receivable (in tab Accounting) = 113001 - Trade Receivables
    You set the Control Account - Down Payment Receivable (also in tab Accounting) = 113009 - Receivables Down Payment
    You set the Down Payment Clearing Account = 253001 - Advance Sales
    If you create an A/R Invoice, the following journal should created:
    Dr. 113001 - Trade Receivables
    Cr. 241001 - Tax Payable
    Cr. 411001 - Revenue
    As you can see, above action will result in posting to 113001, as your setting of Account Receivable.
    Now, if you create an A/R Down Payment Invoice, the following journal should created:
    Dr. 113001 - Trade Receivables
    Cr. 241001 - Tax Payable
    Cr. 253001 - Advance Sales
    As you can see, SAP still post the A/R to 113001. However, if you want to separate the receivable created from A/R Invoice from A/R Down Payment Invoice for particular customer, you could change the account from "Accounting" tab in A/R Down Payment Invoice document, "Control Account" field. There you can amend the control account to 113009 for instance.
    Therefore, your journal posting of the down payment invoice should be like this:
    Dr. 113009 - Receivables Down Payment
    Cr. 241001 - Tax Payable
    Cr. 253001 - Advance Sales
    Don't ask me why we still need to amend this manually if we already set the control account in business partner master data
    Maybe in future version we could post to this control account if we already set it in customer master data. But, for this moment, it only contain the account information with no impact of automatic posting.
    Best Regards,
    Hendry Wijaya

  • BELGIAN DOWN PAYMENT REQUEST --Need a feedback experience URGENT

    Hi all,
    The case concerns the down payment request in a belgian company code:
    1/ The process begins with the posting of a FAZ document type from SD module (through transaction VF01) => Therefore a down payment request is posted in FI with special G/L account "F". This document is a statistical document.
    2/ But in the belgian legislation this statistical document should be in program RFUMSV00 and therefore the VAT must be declared.
    I found a program(RFUMSANF that SAP developped to create another document in reference of the down payment request document issued from SD but with a different numbering. The fiscalist told me that he can't accept because the belgian legislation said that it's the down payment request number that must appear in the declaration and in the solution provided by SAP we're obliged to create a new document number => Therefore there is a gap in the sequential numbering generated from SD.
    If you have already faced this problem, thanks for telling me what were your answers and what kind of solutions have you implemented to solve this problems.
    I take any help.
    Thanks a lot for your help.

    Hi,
    The concept of Downpayment is to have the advance payment received booked in the system by creating a downpayment request/invoice.
    In your case the Downpayment Request is 100%, so it becomes difficult to apply the same to the Invoice in the Payment window.
    Through Internal Reconciliation window, the same cannot be reconciled. Check Note no. : 1340606 regarding the system behavior.
    The following options can be checked in the COPY of the database :
    1) Option of applying the Downpayment Request and the Invoice and making a payment of 0.01 cent and then transfering the same to the Rounding account.
    2) Checking the option of AR Reserve invoice in case there is 100% Downpayment.
    Please check and consult the account of the company.
    Kind Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • BELGIAN DOWN PAYMENT REQUEST --Need a feedback experience

    Hi all,
    The case concerns the down payment request in a belgian company code:
    1/ The process begins with the posting of a FAZ document type from SD module (through transaction VF01) => Therefore a down payment request is posted in FI with special G/L account "F". This document is a statistical document.
    2/ But in the belgian legislation this statistical document should be in program RFUMSV00 and therefore the VAT must be declared.
    I found a program(RFUMSANF that SAP developped to create another document in reference of the down payment request document issued from SD but with a different numbering. The fiscalist told me that he can't accept because the belgian legislation said that it's the down payment request number that must appear in the declaration and in the solution provided by SAP we're obliged to create a new document number => Therefore there is a gap in the sequential numbering generated from SD.
    If you have already faced this problem, thanks for telling me what were your answers and what kind of solutions have you implemented to solve this problems.
    I take any help.
    Thanks a lot for your help.

    Hi,
    The concept of Downpayment is to have the advance payment received booked in the system by creating a downpayment request/invoice.
    In your case the Downpayment Request is 100%, so it becomes difficult to apply the same to the Invoice in the Payment window.
    Through Internal Reconciliation window, the same cannot be reconciled. Check Note no. : 1340606 regarding the system behavior.
    The following options can be checked in the COPY of the database :
    1) Option of applying the Downpayment Request and the Invoice and making a payment of 0.01 cent and then transfering the same to the Rounding account.
    2) Checking the option of AR Reserve invoice in case there is 100% Downpayment.
    Please check and consult the account of the company.
    Kind Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • AP Down Payment Invoice Service

    Dear all,
    When I made an AP Down Payment Invoice Service, I want to choose Down Payment Clearing account from GL Account (row level), but when I browse the GL Account, there's no account appear.
    Anybody knows ?
    This is different with AP Down Payment Invoice Type Item, where at GL Account field (Row Level) ,  I can browse / choose any account, a list of account appear when browse.
    Why at AP Down Payment Invoice type Service there's not appear GL Account on the list like AP DP type Item ?
    Anybody can help ?
    Thank you so much,
    Surya

    Hi Surya......
    The DP Account is unique at AP Down Payment Service Level.
    You have to map it in Business Partner Master Data which comes into the Down Payment Service Invoice when you going to add it..........
    Please check once again by defining account for down payment in Business Partner.....
    Regards,
    Rahul

  • Down Payment Assets

    Hi Friends,
    Can some one tell me teh steps for configuring - Down Payment Assets.
    Regards
    Ashok Prabhu

    Configuration of Down payment in SAP R/3
    Step 1:
    Create GL account under Current Liabilities - Down payment received.
    Select the Line item display; Recon A/c: Customer; Sort Key: 031; FSG: G067
    Step 2:
    Path: IMG-FA-ARAP-Bus Trans-Down Pmt Recd - Define Recon Account for Customer Down payment
    Double click the line D-A-DownPmt-Down Pmt
    Enter CoA
    Recon A/c: Debtors GL account
    Special GL A/c: Down pmt Recd GL acc no
    Save
    Testing:
    1. Tcode: F-29
    Customer>>accounbt: Customer GL
    Special GL : A
    Bank Account: Bank GL
    2. Make Sales entry using F-22 (down pmt will be shown in the status)
    3. Clearing: F-39; Click the required Down pmt and Save; Even partial is possible

  • A/P Down Payment Invoice Item/Service Type

    Dear Experts,
    Just wondering why in A/P Down Payment Invoice for the Item Type, the G/L Account i can view and select the G/L Account in a List. However, in A/P Down Payment Invoice for the Service Type i ONLY can view and select the only one G/L Account which i have been set at Adminstration-> Setup-> Financial-> G/L Account Detremination-> Purchase Tab for Down Payment Clearing Account.
    Your Reply is highly appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Danny

    The Clearing accounts is just that, a place where the down payment amount temporary sits, until it is cleared out through normal business processing. Having all the down payment amounts residing in a single expense account makes reporting this expense much easier from a General Ledger perspective.
    With that being said, you can create down payment clearing accounts at the Business Partner level, this giving you the ability to use different accounts: Business Partners > Business Partner Master Data  > Accounting > General Tab.
    Hope that helps.
    Mike

  • Error while posting Down Payment

    Hi,
    I got error while posting down payment in F-48. the error was "Special G/L Indicator P is not defined for down payment".
    Thanks,

    Hello,
    "Special G/L Indicator P is not defined for down payment" because you have not maintained this indicator in your system. For maintain this you go to TC: OBYR, dbl down payment indicator P, , give your chart of accounts and press enter. Here you have to give normal Recon A/c and Alternative Recon A/c and save it. Now, go to TC: F-48 and you will able to post it now.
    Thanks
    Para

Maybe you are looking for

  • Missing Shortcut under Conditionnal Item Display in popup window

    Just under each Condition Type in APEX, we have nice Shortcut Like [PL/SQL] [item=value] [item not null]... Do you know why you dont put these shortcuts in the popup windows in Conditional Item Display region when you active the Edit Links on the yel

  • Gettin Error code:-2147215361 Error code name:outOfMemoryError

    Hi all, I have Crystal Report Server 2008 V1 and when I invoke the Crystal Report server from my java file i am getting the below error. com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.lib.ReportSDKException: Out of memory error occurred. - Java heap space-- Er

  • Fire fox can't show google images like I previous seen.

    When I want to watch some pictures from google.com/images the fire fox show the pictures page very long.. and the preview is change from before.. what should I do to this problem.. reply me in my mail account.. Problem snapshot. forum link [url=http:

  • Dragging out of iPhoto library

    I've heard that opening the iPhoto library from the finder is a bad thing. Especially moving stuff around. If I want quick access to a file in that folder, will it hurt (or possibly hurt) to option - drag the file to the desktop, so that I'm not actu

  • JBO-30019: An unavailable cookie state is detected while attempting to use

    Dear All, We are using WLS-10.3.2 and one of the application module is deployed in "psMS6" managed server which is in seperate machine and started remotely. This configuration is in Production environment. We are getting Stuck threads in psMS6 manage