Downpayment should not be more than PO Value including tax and other charg

Hi
when we create a down payment request thru F-47, it checks on basic amount ,but we want it checks with total PO value and at the same time for all po line itmes. How is possible. please help.
Regards

Dear Avinash,
We had the same issue.
There is no standard configuration in SAP because system throws error when the net value in PO is exceeded.
But your requirement is when Gross value (Net Value + Freight, legalization charges etc) is exceeded the system should throw the error.
We had to take help of our ABAP team to create user exit.
They added a break point with the logic of throwing error when Gross value is exceeded.
It worked for us.
Regards
Saurabh

Similar Messages

Downpayment should not be more than PO Value

Dear All
Down payment against purchase order
Downpayment should not be more than PO Value
here i want control material wise taht mean some of the material shouble be allow the exces payment and some of the material should not be allow the exces amount. againt purchase order
Regards
Navap

Hi,
For your you need to write Validation in OB28 and take help of your ABAPEr, the logic will be:
1. Create Set through GS01Table MARAField MATNR
2. Pre-Requisite
    BKPF-BLART = 'Down payment Document"
   Check
    Give Exit Name such as UF101 and in this exit you can ask your ABAper to write code that
if Material on PO is in Set (created in Step 1) and Advance Amount > PO Amount then post DP
Message
Give your own message number
Hope this helps!
Br,Vivek

Purchase Order Quantity should not be more than PR quantity

Dear all,
We want to control Purchase Order quantity against Purchase Requisition.
We have configured message setting 00 076 as ERROR. when we create Material PR for lets say 100 quantity. When we create single or multiple Material PO against this PR for more than 100 quantity system is giving us error. This is exactly what we needed.
But due to this message setting when we create Service PR and give service quantity lets say 100. and when we create Service PO and give Service quantity 60. First time system is allowing to save the Service PO.
When we create another Service PO with reference to same Service PR system is showing error as we have configured. Even though quantity 40 is still available.
What we want is to have control on quantity of Purchase Order for Material as well as service. Quantity should not be more than PR quantity.
Is there any other way to have such control? please provide other available options to configure.
Regards
Kant

Hi,
06 076 is only for applicable only in case of material.
For Service and material both, use 06 400 as error "Materials/services for requisition & & already ordered with & &"
NOtes 786736
This may help u !
Regards,
Pardeep malik

Base Amount should not be more than PO net price

hi
Base Amount should not be more than PO net price , in MIGO if the Material is excisable excise tab will be populate i can able to change the base amount . i need the restriction Base Amount should not be more than PO net price , this requirement for purticarly for the dealar relegated tax codes . i am not maintain any conditions relegated BED ,ECESSand SECESS in the taxcode . i will eater the excise tab in MIGO or J1IEX Directly . please advise me how to restrict
@sakhi

if that is the case why are you proividing the Authorization for MIGO_GR transcation...........Restrict the MIGO transaction and try to give MB01 transaction .So that there will no discrepancy in PO to GR....

How to write validation in java sript item should not allow more than 20 ch

HI,
I need to write validation in java script for a item it should not allow more than 20 characters.
Thanks
Nr

If this answers your question, please mark your question as answered (so everyone knows it is answered) and assign points where you see fit..
Thank you,
Tony Miller
Webster, TX

Should not allow more than one attendance or absence code on any given day

Hi Hr Experts ,
I need to use customer enhancement in my program.
CATS should not allow more than one attendance or absence code on any given day. requirement is
that each day will be either a full attendance or full absence and there will not be any mixture.
Function/Program: u2022
EXIT_SAPLCATS_006: CATS: Validate Entire Time Sheet
transaction code CAT2.
how to code the same?

hai,
check the Time constraint class for absence/attendance types.
Regards,
Chiran Reddy.

PO Qty should not be more than PR Qty

Hi All,
I am creating a PO from PR.
I want that the PO qty should never be more than PR qty, and if so it should give an error.
Can anyone tell me the BADI or exit for this? I have already seen exits for PO and PR, but I am not able to figure out which exit to use.
Thanks in advance.
Vinod.

Hello,
You can use the function exit EXIT_SAPMM06E_012 to carry out this validation.
Thanks,
Venu

Residual payment should not allow more than Vendor Invoice

Hi,
Eg: Vendor has booked invoice 5000 INR, when user make payment through F-53 or F-58 through "Residual" payment user can pay more than invoice 5002 INR and below accounting entry is posting.
Bank Cr 5002 INR
To Vendor Dr 5000 INR (Invoice amount)
To Vendor Dr 02 INR Excess than invoice
Business requirement is system should not allow pay more than invoice amount. How to control suggestion would be appreciated.
I have done below settings for your understanding here system configuration.
1. OBA3: Under "Permitted Payment difference" zero for Gain , Loss , Amount, Percent & Adjust Discount By However "Permitted Payment Differences for Automatic write-Off(Function code AD)" zero.
2. OBA4: Cash discount per line item: Zero and Under "Permitted Payment difference" Revenues, Expense, Percent & Cash discount put Zero.
Regards,
Babu.

Hi Prashant,
I have restricted many fields to use through screen variant now user can not pay more than Invoice amount except through Residual payment process.
Client side management strongly says that they want to use Partial and Residual payment process options but user should not allow pay more than invoice amount.
If any solution please guide me.
Regards,
Babu.

Validate that user should not enter more than specified number of digits/chars?

Hello
First case: I have placed a TEXT field on the form. Now i want to put the below validation,
1) User has to enter only numbers (no decimals)
2) Only 10 digits
If not i need to
1) Alert app.alert
2) Make the field either CLEARIng or considering & resetting only the first 10 digits (if user entered more than 10 digits)
2nd case: Same as above, a TEXT field, but, the data is with a DECIMAL notation, the allowed lenghts are as
2 digits as prefix to decimal
2 digits as suffix to decimal position
example, 35.88
Pls. let me knw the Java Script for these 2 cases or do you suggest me PATTERN validation if so, can i CLEAR or reset and if so, pls. let me know under which TAB(Display / Edit / Data) i need to put the PATTERN validation?

Firstly if you are only allowing numbers then the field should be a numeric field not a text field. You can use patterns to allow only whole numbers or to have 2 digits on either side of the decimal.
In regards to the number of digits you can use the len function to determine the length of the data and if it is too long give a message or clear it.

Confirmation qty in co11 should not be more than operation GR qty (subc)

hi,
i have an issue after the operation(external process). we made GR in migo. it will be updated in particular production order
co03 - operation overview - select operation - ext proc tab - GR quantity ( here it is updated after migo)
now we have to do confirmation in co11. yield+ scrap = GR quantity(external operation quantity)
it should not more that of GR quantity.
sometimes they do partial receipt and do remaining operation in inhse.
so system should check First operation GR quantity , while making confirmation in co11
is it possible????
thanks in advance...

Prakhash,
You will have to implement the Production Order Confirmation user-exits to check based on your requirement. Try the below user-exits and see which one meet's your requirement.
CONFPP01 |PP order conf.: Determine customer specific default values |
CONFPP02
PP order conf.: Customer specific input checks 1
CONFPP03
PP order conf.: Cust. specific check after op. selection
CONFPP04
PP order conf.: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPP05
PP order conf.: Customer specific enhancements when saving
CONFPP06
PP Order Confirmations: Actual Data Transfer
CONFPP07
Single Screen Entry: Inclusion of User-Defined Subscreens
Try and revert back.
Regards,
Swapnil

Item should not invoiced more then order value

Hi my all friend and Laxmi
I have one requirement where i want a item can not invoiced more then there order item value
Please suggest me with your valueable suggestion

Hi,
T. Code: VTFA (Order-Bill Copy-Control Settings)
Select Target Bill Doc and Source Sales Doc.
Click: Item (Left Hand tree)
Select Item category and Double Click.
There is one Field: Billing quantity
Please maintain appropriate selection (My suggestion "A" - Order to Bill ; else "B", if Delivery to Bill)
Best Regards,
Amit

WRT54G wireless - but not on more than one device at time- and now not at all

Since changing internet providers we have had major issues with our router and trying to get the wireless to work with more than one computer at a time. I am gathering it's an IP address conflict, we have had this message pop up sometimes-- but am not sure how to go about fixing it. I have a linksys WRT54G, 6 weeks out of warrenty ( I tried to call for support and was told they would *gladly* help me for $30-$40-- which really bugs me as this was the first time I EVER called. We should be allowed at least one free call no matter how long out of warrenty- end rant )
Anyway-- I have two laptops, Netflix via WII, and an I-touch. For awhile, one computer could access wireless, sometimes both would, sometimes none would- as has been the problem in the last couple of days. It seems one computer would be more consistent in "grabbing" access- don't know if this is important to know or not:)) I tried to look to see if his computer had a static ip address - but couldn't find any info to support that theory...
I doubt it is a router failure as it was working fine with the previous interent provider- but now it is not-- I have tried to reset the router and reconfigure via the webbased setup pages. Nothing I am trying is working, not real surprising-- as I really don't know what I am doing--
I don't think it is the internet provider as internet access works fine hardwired trhough the modem via the router...
Can someone ** please** help walk me through this??
thanks
Tammy

Thanks for the reply-- The issue has been solved.....
I found an online manual and was in the process of reinstalling the wrt54g cd - starting over from the beginning. I felt since it started only after we switched ISPs , that it must have been a config problem and turns out it was.... The manual said to ask ISP for settings. I tried to do that 3 weeks ago and the tech support for ATT was unhelpful.
So I tried calling ATT again today for the proper settings for the router. The tech was fantastic. She walked me through everything -- so now I have wireless PCs, netflix and Itouch again, yea!! It was not the router, but trying to get the modem and the router to communicate with each other....
Thanks for trying
Tammy

Reading more than one value with XPath and java 1.5

Hello, I'm using XPath with Java 1.5 and I've some problems.
I do these things:
File xmlDocument = new File("c:/test.xml");
InputSource inputSource = new InputSource(new FileInputStream(xmlDocument));
XPathFactory factory = XPathFactory.newInstance();
XPath xPath = factory.newXPath();
int replication = Integer.parseInt(xPath.evaluate("/simulation/setup/replication", inputSource));
System.out.println(replication); // THIS WORKS!
warmuptime = Integer.parseInt(xPath.evaluate("/simulation/setup/warmuptime", inputSource));
System.out.println(warmuptime); // THIS DON'T WORK: javax.xml.xpath.XPathExpressionException
As I had written in the comments, the first time I call ".evaluate", it works, the second time it raises an exception.
The Xml is correct! The string "/simulation/setup/warmuptime" is correct!
I tryed to place a:
xPath.reset()
between the two "evaluate", but still doesn't work.
Can you give me an help? or suggest me an url where these things are explained in a simple way?
I just need to get some data from an XML file and XPath seems to be the quickest and easiest way.
Thanks for the help.

Are all the files in one directory? If so you can make a File object of the directory, get an array of all files in that directory (File has a method to do this). Then loop over your array and call a method that reads the File that you pass as a parameter.

Not able to select more than two values

Based on picklist.fmb, I created a list item in a form.
I am able select many values using SHIFT but I am not able to pick more than two values using CTRL key.
Anything I did mistake or picklist won't support picking more than two values using CTRL?
Also I am not able to get the scroll bar attaching to this list item.
Please advise.
Thank you,
Prasad

hi,
You have to set the LINES property of the table control In the PBO of your screen, to the number of entries in the internal table.
data: lv_line type i.
DESCRIBE TABLE gt_table LINES lv_line.
table_control-lines = lv_line + 1.
or else
You can do two thing in table control properties check horizontal and vertical scroll options plus in PBO you can based on number of lines in internal table assign it to TC_ABC-LINES if no lines are there then add by default 20..10.. any number of lines as you want.

Power view display more than 500 values in a field

From my research, it looks like the limit of values in a Power View filter is 500. does anyone if this is configurable to increase (which
I am doubting based on Microsoft’s website as I’ve copied below). If it is not configurable and we cannot display more than 500 values when filtering, then what should be done
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh231514%28v=sql.110%29.aspx

You could always do the concatenation on the client. ie: "select action1, action2 from tableX" and then create a boilerplate object with text that references both of these columns. (eg: "&<action1> &<action2>"). This should give you the concatenation you're after.
Another alternative is to return a "long" column instead. The 4000 is probably down to the varchar datatype restriction.

Downpayment should not be more than PO Value including tax and other charg

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for