Dreamweaver Lightbox exclude a named anchor

I'm working on a non-flash backup for my baby hats catalog.  I use Dreamweaver CS5.5 and a lightbox that I downloaded from the widgets to display the images.  However, my first image and then two inbetween each hat are other <a></a> tags.  The first serves as a named anchor for the navigation and the second opens a .pdf. When you view the lightbox images these two appear as the "waist lightbox is loading" circle image.  You have to click "next" twice to get to the next actual image.  Is there a way to exclude these two instances? I'm afraid my end users won't know to click "next" twice to see the next image.
Thanks.
My code is on this page:
http://www.ecochicknits.com/Babyold.html

Use 'data-lightbox' attribute to combine each set of hats into its specific gallery, thereby restricting each lightbox instance to only show 4 or 5 of those hat images and not all images available on page. Read http://lokeshdhakar.com/projects/lightbox2/ (How to Use) section for more details on how you can do this
On a sidenote, why are you including the jquery.js and lightbox.js 3 times each on your page? Your HTML page, Lines 159-167:
<script src="Scripts/jquery.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="Scripts/lightbox.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="SpryAssets/SpryMenuBar.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="Scripts/jquery.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="Scripts/lightbox.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="Scripts/jquery.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="Scripts/lightbox.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="Scripts/jquery.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="Scripts/lightbox.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
You can remove the lines I've struck off here. You're already calling these scripts in the first 2 lines.

Similar Messages

  • Dreamweaver CS5.5 - Header, Named Anchor and Hidden text

    Hello,
    I am a relative novice when using dreamweaver. I don't use it in an official capacity, rather than as a Hobby.
    I have created a webpage with a position fixed header, displaying a Jump Menu/Drop Down Menu linking to named anchors on the page. I have a css linked to the page using:
    #header {
        text-align: center;
        width: 100%;
        background-color: #CFC;
        position:fixed;
        top:0;
        left:0;
        z-index:1000;
    When I use the menu to jump to the named anchor (#a04x01), the page will display the text, but the "Chapter One" text is hidden behind the header.
    My question is how to either offset the named anchor so when it is jumped to, it appears 200px above where it is meant to (So displaying "Chapter One")?, or to alter the header so it is in a solid state so the text cannot scroll "beneath" it, rather the page considers the bottom on the header the top of the page?.
    Any suggestion or solves would be gratefully accepted.
    PS: If needed, I can supply the .html page, & .css
    Thank you
    Regards
    TjStorm

    Remove position:fixed from your <header> and you won't have that problem.  Fixed positioned elements are not part of the normal document flow as they are at fixed coordinates at all times.
    This example uses fixed elements with ample top- and bottom-padding between sections.  View source to see the code.
    jQuery Smooth Scrolling with Fixed Layout
    Nancy O.

  • Named anchor in dreamweaver cc

    I cant seem te find named anchor in dreamweaver cc even though i looked about atleast then times at the insert button hmm that i find kind of strange

    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1235387

  • How to close one browser window and return to a named anchor on a page in another window

    I'm working on a website that has several book images at the bottom of each page. I have set it up so when the user clicks on a book another smaller browser window opens up with a description of the book. At the bottom of book description window, I have a close button which I added the window.close() behavior to. But I'd like to not just have the window close but return the user to the bottom of the original page where I have the books, an area that I have applied a named anchor to. Any ideas on how I can get this done.
    I'd appreciate any and all help.

    I haven't tried to customize this lightbox extension much.  But I'm pretty sure the size of the box is pre-determined by image size.  Bigger image, bigger box.  And that is coded into one of the Lightbox javascript libraries.
    As to placing a link in the caption, sure.  Just paste your html link code into the Lightbox Caption Panel like so.
    <a href="http://amazon.com"> Buy now from Amazon</a>
    There is much more detailed information about Lightbox and how it works at the huddled together website.
    http://www.huddletogether.com/projects/lightbox/
    Nancy O.
    Alt-Web Design & Publishing
    Web | Graphics | Print | Media  Specialists
    www.alt-web.com/
    www.twitter.com/altweb

  • Named Anchors and the HTML doc

    Normally, when using the the default "Flash Only" setting in the HTML publish settings, you can set the dimensions to 100 x 100 percent.  This will make the Flash movie fill the browser window and resize with the browser.
    I'm using named anchors and am using the "Flash with Named Anchors" setting in the HTML publish settings.  Everything else is the same as when I use the "Flash Only" template.  However, when I publish this HTML document it is not filling the browser window correctly.  Instead, the movie is being displayed as if I had set the movie size to 100 x 100 pixels instead of percent.  In other words, the Flash movie is squeezed into a size of 100 x 100 pixels.  Something is causing it to misinterpret percent as pixels.
    I've looked at the HTML document and it correctly says width="100%" height="100%".  This problem occurs in Firefox 3.6.  Everything displays correctly in IE8 and Safari 5.  Thank you in advance to anybody with advice or a solution.

    helpall wrote:
    > I looked in my books and help but found nothing on
    linking to anchors in Spry
    > panels. I have this sinking feeling that DW doesn't let
    you link to anchors in
    > specific panels. Or am I wrong and just need to add
    additional code to the link
    > besides the url and the #anchor name?
    It has nothing to do with what Dreamweaver will let you do
    nor not do, it has to do with what you the panels are "told" to do
    in certain situations. In this case you want to open a specific
    panel, preferably based upon the anchor name that you're already
    using. Take a look at the URL Utilities sample page, in particular
    at the last example:
    http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/spry/samples/utils/URLUtilsSample.html
    This means you'd need to get the full Spry download:
    http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/spry/home.html
    If you wanted, you could add a query string parameter like
    the above example does, but that might mean changing a lot of
    links.
    Or you could modify the example code above to "slice" out the
    first letter of the anchor and figure out the index of the tab to
    show (they use a 0 based index, so 'a' would 0 and 'z' would be 25.
    Try the following:
    <script type="text/javascript">
    <!--
    var hash = window.location.hash;
    if(hash){
    // get the character code of the upper case of the first
    letter then subtract 65
    // 'A' has a character code of 65, so the subtraction gets
    our tab index from 0 to 25
    var charCode = hash.toUpperCase().charCodeAt(0)-65;
    if(charCode < 0 || charCode > 25){ // If not in A-Z
    range, use default for 'a'
    charCode = 0;
    else{
    // Default to tab 0, or 'a' when no hash present
    var charCode = 0;
    //The defaultTab value checks to see if the url param is
    defined. If it is not, it sets it to 0.
    var
    var TabbedPanels1 = new
    Spry.Widget.TabbedPanels("TabbedPanels1", {defaultTab: charCode });
    //-->
    </script>
    Danilo Celic
    |
    http://blog.extensioneering.com/
    | WebAssist Extensioneer
    | Adobe Community Expert

  • Help!! Why are of my sitemap links not landing on their named anchors?

    I've just manually completed a sitemap for my dreamweaver 8 website: http://www.ggordontowerofbabel.co.cc  The first 2 pages are fine, with all the links landing just at the spot I want them to.
    However, on the 3rd page, they land on the spot, but as soon as the page is fully loaded, it jumps off indiscriminately to another part of the page? This is only a problem once it is loaded onto the server for anyone to access. However, all is fine locally, where only, "MyMediaPage.htm#MyFilm" is applied to the link, but once on the server, I add the full url http://www.ggordontowerofbabel.co.cc//MyMediaPage.htm#MyFilm
    Again, all is fine on the first 2 pages on the server, and I'm using the same method.
    After removing code from the body tag, it helped only partially. However, now the link lands on the next named anchor instead, almost as catch-up. So, while it may briefly land on its target, it still shoots onto the previous or next one. Please help!!

    Hi
    Thank you for your help. Since you didn't experience the same problem, I checked the page in IE. It was fine. So, it seems that it is only a Mozilla Freezefox problem, and will need to figure out how to fix that.
    I'm gratefull too for your additional information, as all constructive criticism is very welcome, so I will now change the red font colour as you suggested. If you thought it was bad then, I had just changed the font itself from TN Roman to Ariel, so think yourself lucky your eyes were spared that
    I've also considered your excellent advice on running the page throught the validator. I've done that. However, reading and understanding html coding is torture for me, as simple, plain English would help me better.
    Truly grateful.

  • Why is my named anchor link not working

    Can someone please help.
    I am a novice at Dreamweaver - but my website works well with almost all links working.
    Situation :
    The problem lies on the following page  www.ozonesystems.co.uk/airunits
    There are 7 links in the table which point to Named Anchors
    While browsing in Internet Explorer, all links work perfectly
    While in MozillaFirefox or Google Chrome, only the fist 2 links work. The remaining 5 links do not redirect me to the appropriate section (anchor) on the page. There is no error message.
    Can anybody please help with this problem?
    Thanks - Roy Marnewick

    Hi Jon
    Many thanks for your reply and comments.
    I am a real novice. I used ApDiv's only because I had a problem in getting images and text to reside where I intended them to be placed - and this was the only way which I discovered would achieve the result I required. I do not want to re-invent the wheel, so I will just live with problems which may appear to those using different size text, and hope there are minimal visitors doing this!
    I will visit the link which you have provided to resolve the minor errors. Thanks for the link.
    It is good to hear that (hopefully) the problem is not as widespread as I thought it might be as you did not experience a problem while browsing with Firefox36 and Chrome40. I will try and clear the browser cache as suggested - do not know how - but will try and find out.
    Thanks & Regards
    Roy Marnewick

  • Jump to a Named Anchor when loading an HTML doc

    I have a CollapsiblePanel with a Content Link to a Named
    Anchor in info.html and I thought I could use loadURL() to load the
    page into the Div "thetext" but it does not work. Can Spry Jump to
    a Named Anchor when it loads an HTML doc?
    onClick:
    Spry.Utils.updateContent('thetext',
    '/information2.php#Insurance')
    And I also tried:
    Spry.Utils.loadURL('thetext', '/information2.php#Insurance')
    The Head:
    <script src="SpryAssets/SpryCollapsiblePanel.js"
    type="text/javascript"></script>
    <link href="SpryAssets/SpryCollapsiblePanel.css"
    rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
    <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"
    src="Spry_P1_6_10-01/includes/SpryData.js"></script>
    <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"
    src="Spry_P1_6_10-01/includes/SpryEffects.js"></script>

    On 08 Oct 2007 in macromedia.dreamweaver, antonioconte wrote:
    > Does anyone know if and how its possible to jump to a
    named anchor?
    > I need to use the behavior panel to call a page into a
    pop up and
    > jump to an anchor too - is this possible?
    Sure - just make the link to the anchor:
    <a
    href="page.php#anchor"
    onclick="popupscript('page.php#anchor');return false;">
    Open my popup window</a>
    Making the link attribute (href=) the same as the popup
    window means that
    people who are visiting your site with javascript turned off
    will also
    get the information from the page. The 'return false' in the
    onclick
    event means that the href won't fire if javascript is turned
    on.
    Joe Makowiec
    http://makowiec.net/
    Email:
    http://makowiec.net/contact.php

  • Named Anchor Problem

    Hi folks.
    The problem I have is that after a few years of running my
    band's website (basic HTML using Dreamweaver) we decided to get a
    'pro' to build us a new one. Well they did and now it's impossible
    for me to do anything with it apart from very basic text updates
    etc.
    The first problem is that the site is PHP?? and also all the
    page layouts are determined by CSS and any page content is a basic
    file that loads into the pages, if you see what I mean.
    I am ok with basic editing, updating the news adding shop
    items etc but I have now hit a brick wall and the 'pro' is now
    unavailable!
    What I am trying to do is put a link in the main menu on the
    left of the front page that jumps to a named anchor on the shop
    page to take you directly to the 'Downloads' section at the bottom.
    I can get it to either just jump to the shop page (but at the top)
    as normal, or to jump to the anchor as I want, but with the shop
    page outside the page/frame it sits in.
    How do I do this?
    Troublesome Site

    http://www.midcoast.com.au/~christo2/byf_site/teachers_amanda.html
    The links are from the teacher names in the right hand column. The named anchor sits between the masthead image and the navigation menu.

  • Linking to a Named Anchor link in a PDF

    Does anyone know if you can create a link in the Dreamweaver
    editor to another page of an PDF other than page 1.
    For example, something like this.
    <a href="
    http://www.website.com/new_site/pdf/PAGE2.pdf#RHS"
    target="_blank">Page 2</a>
    Or does anyone know if you can add a named anchor in a PDF
    document?

    http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=317300
    Ken Ford
    Adobe Community Expert - Dreamweaver
    Fordwebs, LLC
    http://www.fordwebs.com
    "QuantumPete" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:fqka6p$i2j$[email protected]..
    >
    > Does anyone know if you can create a link in the
    Dreamweaver editor to
    > another
    > page of an PDF other than page 1.
    >
    > For example, something like this.
    >
    > <a href="
    http://www.website.com/new_site/pdf/PAGE2.pdf#RHS"
    > target="_blank">Page 2</a>
    >
    > Or does anyone know if you can add a named anchor in a
    PDF document?
    >

  • Target Named Anchor in a Spry Collapsible Panel from a different page

    Let me start by saying I have combed this forum (and others) looking for a resolution to this.  I am familiar with David Powers solution on Foundationphp.com and am using that code in project to open the collapsible panel from a separate page and it works beautifullly.  The problem I have is that I want the browser to move down to a specific named anchor inside that opened collapsible panel when clicked from a different page.
    Snippets of my current code here.
    Below is the code that I have on an image that when clicked goes to the correct page and opens Panel1.  Works Perfectly!
    <a href="bamboo-species.php?col1=open#CollapsiblePanel1"><img src="images/Content/Photos/HomeScroll/blackTmbor.jpg" width="227" height="175" /></a>
    Below is the link to the .js file and the script in the head of the target page
    <script type="text/javascript" src="SpryAssets/SpryURLUtils.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript">
    // Grabs the values of the URL parameters for the current URL.
    var params = Spry.Utils.getLocationParamsAsObject();
    </script>
    Below is the code that I have on the target page for Panel1
    <script type="text/javascript">
    var CollapsiblePanel1 = new Spry.Widget.CollapsiblePanel("CollapsiblePanel1", {contentIsOpen:params.col1 ? true : false},{duration: 1000});
    </script>
    If I have a named anchor say <a name="species1" id="species1"></a> down in the page, how do I target that named anchor from my link on the separate page.  I have tried adding the #species1 to the end of the link on the link page (see below) but with no luck. I believe those were the instructions on foundationphp.com site.
    <a href="bamboo-species.php?col1=open#CollapsiblePanel1#species1"><img  src="images/Content/Photos/HomeScroll/blackTmbor.jpg" width="227"  height="175" /></a>
    I hope (and suspect) that this is an easy fix, I just do not know what it is.  Any help or direction where to look is greatly appreciated.

    I once had the same issue can created a small function that allows me to "jump" to a element.
    function scrollTo( element ){
         var stylize = function( element){ return !+"\v1" ? element.currentStyle : document.defaultView.getComputedStyle( element , null ) },
              getPosition = function( element ){
                   // based on the SpryEffect's module:
                   var computedStyle, tryComputedStyle,
                        position = { x: 0, y: 0 };
                        if ( element.style.left  && /px/i.test(element.style.left) ){
                             position.x = parseInt(element.style.left, 10); // without padding
                        } else {
                             computedStyle = stylize( element );
                             var tryComputedStyle = computedStyle && computedStyle.left && /px/i.test( computedStyle.left );
                             if (tryComputedStyle)
                                  position.x = parseInt( computedStyle.left, 10 ); // without padding, includes css
                             if(!tryComputedStyle || position.x == 0) // otherwise we might run into problems on safari and opera (mac only)
                                  position.x = element.offsetLeft;   // includes padding
                        if ( element.style.top && /px/i.test(element.style.top) )
                             position.y = parseInt( element.style.top, 10); // without padding
                        else
                             if ( !computedStyle )
                                  computedStyle = stylize( element );
                        var tryComputedStyle = computedStyle && computedStyle.top && /px/i.test( computedStyle.top );
                             if ( tryComputedStyle )
                                  position.y = parseInt( computedStyle.top, 10 ); // without padding, includes css
                             if( !tryComputedStyle || position.y == 0 ) // otherwise we might run into problems on safari and opera (mac only)
                                  position.y = element.offsetTop;   // includes padding
                   return position;
              scroll( 0, getPosition( element ).y );
    So now we have a scrollTo function that accepts a pure HTML element as argument, all what is left to do is figure out if we have a hash, and if the anchor exits on the page.
    ( hopes this works, i wrote it without testing, but you get the general idea ):
    if( window.location.hash ){
         var hash = window.location.hash.substr(1), // remove the # from the hash
         element;
         // as anchors can also be used with id attributes, check that first,
         element = document.getElementById( hash );
         // maby we used name="" attribute
         if( !element && ( element = document.getElementsByName( hash )) ){
              element = element[0];
         // if we have a match:
         if( element ){
              // give the collapsible panel some time to init and update the DOM;
              setTimeout(function(){ scrollTo( element ) },0);
    \o/

  • Links to id's and named anchors within a page in an iframe do not open in firefox

    In order to force layout of my liquid website, I use i-frames to display content . It is all on my sight www.rdelutherie.com, and I am not displaying pages from other sights. The links to sections of pages from within the same page do not work in firefox.
    I have had this problem before with named anchors, and in moving up to html5 and in making my site accessible for people with dissabilities, I started using &lt;nav&gt; eliments... and changed from named anchors to links to ID's like this:
    In an unordered list I have these:
    <pre><nowiki> <li><a href="#s1">Subject 1:</a></li>
    </nowiki></pre>
    They link to sections of the same page like this one:
    <pre><nowiki>
    <section id=s1>
    <h2>Subject 1:</h2>
    <p>Blah blah blaaaaah, and bla bla!</p>
    </section></nowiki></pre>
    Last time I researched this problem (a year or more ago), I was told that it was because of a security risk (something about being able to count views...and other peoples proprietary and copyrighted material), but the vaguely described reasoning made little to no sense to me nor many others, who can not even link to our own stuff. The Mozilla developers were rather abrupt and some were even rude in telling us to live with it, instead of trying to come up with a solution or work around, and closed the post and disallowed further posting.
    The problem still persists, and although I am not a programmer, I have a real hard time believing that it is impossible for Firefox to distinguish between links contained within a document and site, from those on different sights, domains and what have you.
    As far as I know, no other browsers have this problem, so if it is such a big security risk, what is to stop someone with malicious intentions, from just using M$ IE, to bring their evil plan to fruition?
    In keeping with "Making the web a better place": Please address this problem, and find a solution, workaround, or at least explain why it is impossible.
    Bob English

    Thanks again jscher2000,
    I know exactly what you mean, but I have had other page display problems with adjacent columns where one side does not display completely and seems to be conforming to the other ones height... hence the height settings and other tricks to force things to be acceptable.
    I am far from understanding code, and most of the solutions, including the one in the link you posted do not have the information a novice like me would need to implement them successfully. Most of them are written for people much more advanced. Without it telling me where exactly to put the code, point to it, what I can (and should) change and remove elsewhere because of it... I am at a loss. I don't know the basics, and have tried hard to understand them, but it is not like electrical circuits, physics and other things that I can understand naturally and with ease.
    I will look into it further in a few days, meanwhile I have to attend to my real work that doesn't even pay the bills completely: guitar building and repair, now that comes easy and naturally to me!

  • RE: Named anchored objects

    Albert,
    In my case I was using a named anchored object to get a handle to an actual
    service object. My named object that I registered in the name service was
    an intermediary to which I did not maintain a connection. So I have not
    explicitly tested what you are asking.
    However, I too was not using a hard coded reference to the SO, and fail over
    and load balancing worked fine. The functions of fail over and load
    balancing are not done by the service object but by the name service, proxy
    and router. Since you are getting a proxy back any time you do a lookup in
    the name service I would think that fail over should work with any anchored
    object that is registered in the name service. When you do a RegisterObject
    call you will notice that one of the arguments is the session duration,
    which implies to me that fail over will be handled the same as for service
    objects.
    Load balancing adds another wrinkle. Load balancing is handled by a router.
    You must get a proxy to the router and not a proxy to an instance of the
    object that the router is doing the load balancing for. In the latter
    scenario you will be bypassing the router. If you are creating, anchoring
    and registering your objects dynamically you will not have a router so you
    will not be able to load balance! This applies even if the objects are
    instantiated within partitions that are load balanced because you will still
    be getting proxies back to a particular instance of the anchored objects.
    There are ways to accomplish load balancing between objects that you
    register yourself. However, the best solution will vary depending on the
    actual problem trying to be solved. If you would like to discuss this
    further, include a little more detail about the scenario you need to
    implement and I will give you what I know.
    BTY what I have outlined above also applies to getting references via a
    system agent.
    Sean
    Cornice Consulting, Inc.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of Albert Dijk
    Sent: Friday, July 03, 1998 11:01 AM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject:
    Alex, David, Jez, Sean,...
    My question about both solutions (using Nameservice and agents) is:
    If I reach a remote service object using either a BindObject or an agent, do
    fail-over and load-balancing work the same way as they normally do when
    using a hard coded reference to the SO.
    Albert Dijk
    From: Sean Brown[SMTP:[email protected]]
    Reply To: [email protected]
    Sent: Thursday, June 25, 1998 6:55 AM
    To: Ananiev, Alex; [email protected]
    Subject: RE: multiple named objects with the same name and
    interface
    Alexander,
    I can not comment on the speed difference because I never tested it.
    But, I
    will say that we looked at the agent solution at a client sight
    before. I
    will give the same warning I gave them. If you go the agent direction
    you
    are now using agents for a purpose that they were not intended. Even
    though
    it technically works, as soon as you start using a piece of
    functionality in
    a way the developer did not intend it to be used you run the risk of
    forward
    compatibility problems. By this I mean, since agents were not
    originally
    intended to be used to look up service / anchored object references,
    it may
    not work in the future because it is not likely to be given
    consideration in
    any future design.
    As we all know, programmers are always stretching the bounds of the
    tools
    they use and you may have a good reason (i.e. performance). I just
    wanted to
    let you know the possible risk.
    One final note on a limitation of using system agents to obtain
    references
    to anchored objects. You can not access agents across environments.
    So, if
    you have connected environments and need to get references to services
    in
    another environment for fail-over or whatever, you will not be able to
    do it
    with agents.
    Just some thoughts!
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href="mailto:[email protected]]On">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of Ananiev, Alex
    Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 1998 12:14 PM
    To: '[email protected]'
    Subject: RE: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
    David,
    The problem with dynamic binding is that in this case you have to keep
    the reference to the service object somewhere. You don't want to call
    "bindObject" every time you need to use this service object, "bind" is
    a
    time-consuming operation, even on the same partition. Keeping
    reference
    could be undesirable if your object could be moved across partitions
    (e.g. business object).
    The alternative solution is to use agents. You can create custom
    agent,
    make it a subagent of an active partition agent and use it as a
    placeholder for whatever service you need. "FindSubAgent" works much
    faster than "bindObject", we verified that and agent is "user-visible"
    by its nature.
    Alexander
    From: "Sean Brown" <[email protected]>
    Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 09:12:55 -0500
    Subject: RE: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
    David,
    I actually determined it through testing. In my case I did not want
    this to
    happen and was trying to determine why it was happing. It makes sense
    if
    you think about it. Forte is trying to avoid making a remote method
    invocation if it can.
    Now, for anything more complex than looking locally first and if none
    is
    found give me any remote instance you can find, you will need to do
    more
    work. Using a naming scheme like Jez suggests below works well.
    Sean
    - -----Original Message-----
    From: Jez Sygrove [<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</a>]
    Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 1998 4:34 AM
    To: [email protected]; 'David Foote'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
    David,
    there's a mechanism used within SCAFFOLDS that allows the
    location of the 'nearest' SO when more than one is available.
    It involves registering each duplicated SO under three dynamically
    built
    names. The names include the partition, the node or the environment
    name.
    When wishing to locate the nearest SO the BO builds a SO name using
    its
    own partition and asks the name service for that.
    If there is an SO registered under that name then it must be in the
    same
    partition and all is well. No cross partition calls.
    If not, then the BO builds the name using its node and asks the name
    service for that.
    This means that if there is an SO outside the BO partition but still
    on
    the same node then this can be used. Again, relatively 'local'.
    If neither of these work then the BO has to resort to an environment
    wide search.
    It may be that this approach could be adapted / adopted; I like it's
    ingenuity.
    Cheers,
    Jez
    From: David Foote[SMTP:[email protected]]
    Reply To: David Foote
    Sent: 24 June 1998 03:17
    To: [email protected]
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: multiple named objects with the same name and
    interface
    Sean,
    First, thank you for your response. I have wondered about this fora
    long time.
    I looked at the documentation for ObjectLocationManager and on page
    327
    of the Framework Library and AppletSupport Library Guide indescribing
    the BindObject method Forte says:
    "The name service allows more than one anchored object (from
    different
    partitions) to be registered in the name service under the same
    registration name. When you invoke the BindObject method with a
    request
    for a name that has duplicate registration entries, the BindObject
    method finds an entry corresponding to an active partition, skipping
    any
    entries that do not. If no such active partition is found, or if the
    requested name is not found in the name service registry, a
    RemoteAccessException will be raised when the BindObject method is
    invoked."
    My question is: How did you discover that in the case of duplicate
    registrations the naming service will return the local object if one
    exists? This is not apparent from the documentation I have quoted.
    Is
    it documented elsewhere? Or did you determine it empirically?
    David N. Foote,
    Consultant
    ----Original Message Follows----
    David,
    First I will start by saying that this can be done by using named
    anchored
    objects and registering them yourself in the name service. There is
    documentation on how to do this. And by default you will get mostof
    the
    behavior you desire. When you do a lookup in the name service
    (BindObject
    method) it will first look in the local partition and see if thereis
    a
    local copy and give you that copy. By anchoring the object and
    manually
    registering it in the name service you are programmatically creating
    your
    own SO without defining it as such in the development environment.
    BTW
    in
    response to your item number 1. This should be the case there as
    well.
    If
    your "mobile" object is in the same partition where the serviceobject
    he is
    calling resides, you should get a handle to the local instance ofthe
    service object.
    Here is the catch, if you make a bind object call and there is no
    local
    copy
    you will get a handle to a remote copy but you can not be sure which
    one!
    It end ups as more or less a random selection. Off the top of myhead
    and
    without going to the doc, I am pretty sure that when you register an
    anchored object you can not limit it's visibility to "User".
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href=
    "mailto:[email protected]]On">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of David Foote
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:51 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
    All,
    More than once, I have wished that Forte allowed you to place named
    objects with the same name in more than one partition. There aretwo
    situations in which this seems desirable:
    1) Objects that are not distributed, but are mobile (passed by value
    to
    remote objects), cannot safely reference a Service Object unless it
    has
    environment visibility, but this forces the overhead of a remote
    method
    call when it might not otherwise be necessary. If it were possibleto
    place a copy of the same Service Object (with user visibility) ineach
    partition, the overhead of a remote method call could be avoided.
    This
    would only be useful for a service object whose state could besafely
    replicated.
    2) My second scenario also involves mobile objects referencing a
    Service
    Object, but this time I would like the behavior of the calledService
    Object to differ with the partition from which it is called.
    This could be accomplished by placing Service Objects with the same
    name
    and the same interface in each partition, but varying the
    implementation
    with the partition.
    Does anyone have any thoughts about why this would be a good thingor
    a
    bad thing?
    David N. Foote
    Consultant
    Alexander Ananiev
    Claremont Technology Group
    916-558-4127
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive
    <URL:<a href="http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    >
    >
    >
    Alexander Ananiev
    Claremont Technology Group
    916-558-4127
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

    Albert,
    In my case I was using a named anchored object to get a handle to an actual
    service object. My named object that I registered in the name service was
    an intermediary to which I did not maintain a connection. So I have not
    explicitly tested what you are asking.
    However, I too was not using a hard coded reference to the SO, and fail over
    and load balancing worked fine. The functions of fail over and load
    balancing are not done by the service object but by the name service, proxy
    and router. Since you are getting a proxy back any time you do a lookup in
    the name service I would think that fail over should work with any anchored
    object that is registered in the name service. When you do a RegisterObject
    call you will notice that one of the arguments is the session duration,
    which implies to me that fail over will be handled the same as for service
    objects.
    Load balancing adds another wrinkle. Load balancing is handled by a router.
    You must get a proxy to the router and not a proxy to an instance of the
    object that the router is doing the load balancing for. In the latter
    scenario you will be bypassing the router. If you are creating, anchoring
    and registering your objects dynamically you will not have a router so you
    will not be able to load balance! This applies even if the objects are
    instantiated within partitions that are load balanced because you will still
    be getting proxies back to a particular instance of the anchored objects.
    There are ways to accomplish load balancing between objects that you
    register yourself. However, the best solution will vary depending on the
    actual problem trying to be solved. If you would like to discuss this
    further, include a little more detail about the scenario you need to
    implement and I will give you what I know.
    BTY what I have outlined above also applies to getting references via a
    system agent.
    Sean
    Cornice Consulting, Inc.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of Albert Dijk
    Sent: Friday, July 03, 1998 11:01 AM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject:
    Alex, David, Jez, Sean,...
    My question about both solutions (using Nameservice and agents) is:
    If I reach a remote service object using either a BindObject or an agent, do
    fail-over and load-balancing work the same way as they normally do when
    using a hard coded reference to the SO.
    Albert Dijk
    From: Sean Brown[SMTP:[email protected]]
    Reply To: [email protected]
    Sent: Thursday, June 25, 1998 6:55 AM
    To: Ananiev, Alex; [email protected]
    Subject: RE: multiple named objects with the same name and
    interface
    Alexander,
    I can not comment on the speed difference because I never tested it.
    But, I
    will say that we looked at the agent solution at a client sight
    before. I
    will give the same warning I gave them. If you go the agent direction
    you
    are now using agents for a purpose that they were not intended. Even
    though
    it technically works, as soon as you start using a piece of
    functionality in
    a way the developer did not intend it to be used you run the risk of
    forward
    compatibility problems. By this I mean, since agents were not
    originally
    intended to be used to look up service / anchored object references,
    it may
    not work in the future because it is not likely to be given
    consideration in
    any future design.
    As we all know, programmers are always stretching the bounds of the
    tools
    they use and you may have a good reason (i.e. performance). I just
    wanted to
    let you know the possible risk.
    One final note on a limitation of using system agents to obtain
    references
    to anchored objects. You can not access agents across environments.
    So, if
    you have connected environments and need to get references to services
    in
    another environment for fail-over or whatever, you will not be able to
    do it
    with agents.
    Just some thoughts!
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href="mailto:[email protected]]On">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of Ananiev, Alex
    Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 1998 12:14 PM
    To: '[email protected]'
    Subject: RE: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
    David,
    The problem with dynamic binding is that in this case you have to keep
    the reference to the service object somewhere. You don't want to call
    "bindObject" every time you need to use this service object, "bind" is
    a
    time-consuming operation, even on the same partition. Keeping
    reference
    could be undesirable if your object could be moved across partitions
    (e.g. business object).
    The alternative solution is to use agents. You can create custom
    agent,
    make it a subagent of an active partition agent and use it as a
    placeholder for whatever service you need. "FindSubAgent" works much
    faster than "bindObject", we verified that and agent is "user-visible"
    by its nature.
    Alexander
    From: "Sean Brown" <[email protected]>
    Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 09:12:55 -0500
    Subject: RE: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
    David,
    I actually determined it through testing. In my case I did not want
    this to
    happen and was trying to determine why it was happing. It makes sense
    if
    you think about it. Forte is trying to avoid making a remote method
    invocation if it can.
    Now, for anything more complex than looking locally first and if none
    is
    found give me any remote instance you can find, you will need to do
    more
    work. Using a naming scheme like Jez suggests below works well.
    Sean
    - -----Original Message-----
    From: Jez Sygrove [<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</a>]
    Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 1998 4:34 AM
    To: [email protected]; 'David Foote'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
    David,
    there's a mechanism used within SCAFFOLDS that allows the
    location of the 'nearest' SO when more than one is available.
    It involves registering each duplicated SO under three dynamically
    built
    names. The names include the partition, the node or the environment
    name.
    When wishing to locate the nearest SO the BO builds a SO name using
    its
    own partition and asks the name service for that.
    If there is an SO registered under that name then it must be in the
    same
    partition and all is well. No cross partition calls.
    If not, then the BO builds the name using its node and asks the name
    service for that.
    This means that if there is an SO outside the BO partition but still
    on
    the same node then this can be used. Again, relatively 'local'.
    If neither of these work then the BO has to resort to an environment
    wide search.
    It may be that this approach could be adapted / adopted; I like it's
    ingenuity.
    Cheers,
    Jez
    From: David Foote[SMTP:[email protected]]
    Reply To: David Foote
    Sent: 24 June 1998 03:17
    To: [email protected]
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: multiple named objects with the same name and
    interface
    Sean,
    First, thank you for your response. I have wondered about this fora
    long time.
    I looked at the documentation for ObjectLocationManager and on page
    327
    of the Framework Library and AppletSupport Library Guide indescribing
    the BindObject method Forte says:
    "The name service allows more than one anchored object (from
    different
    partitions) to be registered in the name service under the same
    registration name. When you invoke the BindObject method with a
    request
    for a name that has duplicate registration entries, the BindObject
    method finds an entry corresponding to an active partition, skipping
    any
    entries that do not. If no such active partition is found, or if the
    requested name is not found in the name service registry, a
    RemoteAccessException will be raised when the BindObject method is
    invoked."
    My question is: How did you discover that in the case of duplicate
    registrations the naming service will return the local object if one
    exists? This is not apparent from the documentation I have quoted.
    Is
    it documented elsewhere? Or did you determine it empirically?
    David N. Foote,
    Consultant
    ----Original Message Follows----
    David,
    First I will start by saying that this can be done by using named
    anchored
    objects and registering them yourself in the name service. There is
    documentation on how to do this. And by default you will get mostof
    the
    behavior you desire. When you do a lookup in the name service
    (BindObject
    method) it will first look in the local partition and see if thereis
    a
    local copy and give you that copy. By anchoring the object and
    manually
    registering it in the name service you are programmatically creating
    your
    own SO without defining it as such in the development environment.
    BTW
    in
    response to your item number 1. This should be the case there as
    well.
    If
    your "mobile" object is in the same partition where the serviceobject
    he is
    calling resides, you should get a handle to the local instance ofthe
    service object.
    Here is the catch, if you make a bind object call and there is no
    local
    copy
    you will get a handle to a remote copy but you can not be sure which
    one!
    It end ups as more or less a random selection. Off the top of myhead
    and
    without going to the doc, I am pretty sure that when you register an
    anchored object you can not limit it's visibility to "User".
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href=
    "mailto:[email protected]]On">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of David Foote
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:51 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
    All,
    More than once, I have wished that Forte allowed you to place named
    objects with the same name in more than one partition. There aretwo
    situations in which this seems desirable:
    1) Objects that are not distributed, but are mobile (passed by value
    to
    remote objects), cannot safely reference a Service Object unless it
    has
    environment visibility, but this forces the overhead of a remote
    method
    call when it might not otherwise be necessary. If it were possibleto
    place a copy of the same Service Object (with user visibility) ineach
    partition, the overhead of a remote method call could be avoided.
    This
    would only be useful for a service object whose state could besafely
    replicated.
    2) My second scenario also involves mobile objects referencing a
    Service
    Object, but this time I would like the behavior of the calledService
    Object to differ with the partition from which it is called.
    This could be accomplished by placing Service Objects with the same
    name
    and the same interface in each partition, but varying the
    implementation
    with the partition.
    Does anyone have any thoughts about why this would be a good thingor
    a
    bad thing?
    David N. Foote
    Consultant
    Alexander Ananiev
    Claremont Technology Group
    916-558-4127
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive
    <URL:<a href="http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    >
    >
    >
    Alexander Ananiev
    Claremont Technology Group
    916-558-4127
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

  • Named Anchor linking from another document

    I made a Named Anchor and linked from some text in another document.  Great.  Worked just fine.  The only thing is it doesn't display the named anchor at the top of the page.
    In other words the footer is at the bottom of the page and the named anchor in the middle of the page...  not at the top.  Like a #top would be.
    Anyway to get it to the top of the page?  Do I just need more content under it?
    Much appreciated!

    Thanks for the help.  I had no luck trying it out.
    If possible, at:  artdesignsneed.com/joeldoctor
    Under menu choice "Treatment" then choose "TFP"....  the first sentence has  ..."Borderline PD developed..."
    I wanted to link Borderline PD to:
    Menu choice: Disorders...  choose Personality...  go down to "Cluster B" and there's Borderline PD.
    The link worked but the named anchor "Borderline PD" is in the middle of the page.
    Cheers if you can help.
    If not, I'm going in the right direction.
    Much appreciated.

  • Named Anchored Obj-Environment Failover

    Hi to all,
    We connect from EnvA to EnvB giving the user directory parameter as / and
    set the Environment Search Path
    as EnvA:EnvB. From both environments we start and register
    '/glob/obj1' named anchored objects with the same name.
    From a client we connect to EnvA and bind to'/glob/obj1' when we shutdown EnvA partition it fails-over to
    EnvB. And then we restart EnvA partition. We restart/rebind the client and
    try to use object. We see that it is using the EnvB object.
    Although we started the primary environment object again.
    It is not using the search path. Once we shutdown secondary environment
    it starts using primary environment object.
    When we try to use relative path when we are binding the object
    First parameter ('glob/obj1') No first slash. Trying 3rd parameter
    for bind function or just using environment search path, Is is not able to
    find the object. From nsls command I figured out that
    under the root directory
    /forte/UUID of ENVA/node
    /site
    /UUID of ENVB
    /glob/obj1
    names are available. When we use relative path (without slash)
    is it trying to find /glob/obj1 under the /forte/UUID of ENVA
    but we are registering the name under the root.
    What is the reason of this odd behaviour or is this a bug?
    Any answer will be appreciated,

    Hi Juliesmiley,
    According to your description, I recommend you check the conditions required for an automatic  failover.
      • Primary replica and secondary replica are both configured for syschronous-commit mode and set to AUTOMATIC failover.
      •  All availability databases that are defined in the availability group must be in a SYNCHRONIZED state between the primary replica and the secondary replica.
      • The Windows Server Failover Clustering (WSFC) cluster has quorum.
      • The primary replica has become unavailable.
    For more information, please review the following articles.
    Failover and Failover Modes (AlwaysOn Availability Groups)
    Troubleshooting automatic failover problems in SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn environments
    Thanks,
    Lydia Zhang

Maybe you are looking for

  • Will FCP Suite work OK on the dual intel iMac G5 ?

    We are getting ready to open a new digital video classroom for up to 26 students. Each student will have a G5, NTSC monitor, firewire capture device of some sort, and sound I/O to quality sound system. Anyone have any experiences or insight to using

  • Wireless not re-connecting

    I'm having difficulty setting up OS X to reconnect to my preferred network automatically. I initially noticed this on my friend's G5 desktop but I'm now seeing it on my MacBook Pro. I'm not surprised about it for me- the wireless network in my apartm

  • Changing Pixel Aspect Ratio with Aperture

    i was wondering if aperture has a way of changing the pixel aspect ratio from square to DI/DV NTSC or HDV. so far i am using photoshop to do that but would love to do it inside aperture.

  • XServe Raid volume corruption

    Hi peoples, My RAID volume has corruption and I have had trouble making an image using Disk Utility. I finally completed what looks like a good copy using sudo ditto -V /Volumes/data/ /Volumes/1TB/ I am about to destroy the RAID and recreate but befo

  • Windows 7 - 64 bit- Should I Upgrade?

    Does the new PE version 9 perform better than PE 8? Currently using PE8 ( many projects) and the "new" computer will be arriving with Windows Pro 7 -  64 bit Trying to decide if an upgrade makes sense. Cost is not an issue.