Dude query with index

Hi all,
My problem is the next: I have two tables, one with 2500000 rows (A) and the other (B) with 1000 rows aprox. I have to join these two tables between two fields B.pk=A.fk. These two fields are indexed. And if I extract the explain plan it doesn't have a high cost (5000 aprox), but when I execute the query it is very slow, it spends more than 2 minutes in finishing. If I drop the index the cost of the explain plan is worse but the execution time is lower, about 15 seconds. What can I do??
Thanks in advance

Hi again,
Thanks for your responses. In first place, my database is 11g. In second place, yes, we have collected statistics for both tables...
The rest is going to be more complicated. We have increased the block size to 32KB, in this way we have improved the time of the execution of the queries, so the explain plan has changed. The current plan is this:
plan FOR correcto.
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 166371783
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 44 | 2724 (1)| 00:00:33 |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY | | 1 | 44 | 2724 (1)| 00:00:33 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 66753 | 2868K| 2717 (1)| 00:00:33 |
|* 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIEMPO_MES | 1 | 17 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | CUPON_COMPLETO_VM_IDX72 | 55168 | | 31 (4)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| CUPON_COMPLETO_VM | 55168 | 1454K| 2714 (1)| 00:00:33 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
4 - filter(CAST("T46538"."ANIO" AS INTEGER )=2011)
5 - access("T46538"."MES_CODIGO"="T99940"."P_MES")
We have improved the time, but we think that we can do it better. I post here the structure of the tables (only the part affected in the join):
desc TIEMPO_MES
Nombre Nulo Tipo
MES_CODIGO NUMBER
MES_CORTO VARCHAR2(15)
ANIO_CODIGO NUMBER
ANIO NUMBER
desc CUPON_COMPLETO_VM
Nombre Nulo Tipo
P_PRODUCIDOS_KEY NUMBER
P_CUPON_ID NUMBER
P_MES NUMBER
E_ENVIADOS_KEY NUMBER
D_DISTRIBUIDOS_KEY NUMBER
R_RESULTADOS_KEY NUMBER
Thanks in advance

Similar Messages

Error during search !!! Associate Search Query with Indexes !!!

We are trying to implement a simple index with Trex Search .
We have done the following tasks :
1. Created my index
2. Assigned data to the the indexes
3. Created taxonomies for classification indexes
4. Created my search query asociated to the index
When we try to search with the iview search , we got this error : "Error during search occurred - com.sapportals.wcm.WcmException: A received argument has an invalid value (Errorcode 18)" .
We think that something is missing and for that we need to know how can we
associate the search query with the index ?
After the step 4), what we have to do in order to get this implementation (search working)
Please send us any ideas ..
THANKS !!!

Dear Ato
Check in IMG Path - Enterprise Structure --> Assignment --> Logistis Execution --> Assign warehouse number to plant/storage location.
Here check whether the warehouse number is assigned to your plant and storage location.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Tuning query with index

hello,
i am trying to avoid full table scan in a query by creating reverse index on the name column in the where clause. but the optimizer still runs full table scan. What can I do?
Regards,
Purvi

Hi,
Reverse key indexes reverse the bytes of each indexed column with the exception of rowid.
I am not sure what you mean when you say the reverse index is supposed to index the names in reverse. When you use the reverse key index lexically adjacent keys are not stored next to each other.
Maybe, reverse index is not right in your situation.

Select query with index acess

Hello,
Please give me some code with using index acess ( please high light the index)

SELECT carrid connid cityfrom
FROM spfli INTO (xcarrid, xconnid, xcityfrom)
WHERE carrid = 'LH ' AND cityfrom = 'FRANKFURT'
%_HINTS ORACLE 'INDEX("SPFLI" "SPFLI~001")'.
WRITE: / xcarrid, xconnid, xcityfrom.
ENDSELECT.
chk this
Select using Secondary Index
Message was edited by:
Chandrasekhar Jagarlamudi

SQL query performance difference with Index Hint in Oracle 10g

Hi,
I was having a problem in SQL select query which was taking around 20 seconds to get the results. So, by hit and trail method I added Index Oracle Hint into the same query with the list of indexes of the tables and the results are retrieved with in 10 milli seconds. I am not sure to get How this is working with Indexes Hint.
The query with out Index Hint:
select /*+rule*/ FdnTab2.fdn, paramTab3.attr_name from fdnmappingtable FdnTab, fdnmappingtable FdnTab2, parametertable paramTab1 ,parametertable paramTab3 where FdnTab.id=52787 and paramTab1.id= FdnTab.id and paramTab3.id = FdnTab.id and paramTab3.attr_value = FdnTab2.fdn and paramTab1.attr_name='harqUsersMax' and paramTab1.attr_value <> 'DEFAULT' and exists ( select ParamTab2.attr_name from parametertable ParamTab2, templaterelationtable TemplateTab2 where TemplateTab2.id=FdnTab.id and ParamTab2.id=TemplateTab2.template_id and ParamTab2.id=FdnTab2.id and ParamTab2.attr_name=paramTab1.attr_name) ==> EXECUTION TIME: 20 secs
The same query with Index Hint:
select /*+INDEX(fdnmappingtable[PRIMARY_KY_FDNMAPPINGTABLE],parametertable[PRIMARY_KY_PARAMETERTABLE])*/ FdnTab2.fdn, paramTab3.attr_name from fdnmappingtable FdnTab, fdnmappingtable FdnTab2, parametertable paramTab1 ,parametertable paramTab3 where FdnTab.id=52787 and paramTab1.id= FdnTab.id and paramTab3.id = FdnTab.id and paramTab3.attr_value = FdnTab2.fdn and paramTab1.attr_name='harqUsersMax' and paramTab1.attr_value <> 'DEFAULT' and exists ( select ParamTab2.attr_name from parametertable ParamTab2, templaterelationtable TemplateTab2 where TemplateTab2.id=FdnTab.id and ParamTab2.id=TemplateTab2.template_id and ParamTab2.id=FdnTab2.id and ParamTab2.attr_name=paramTab1.attr_name) ==> EXECUTION TIME: 10 milli secs
Can any one suggest what could be the real problem?
Regards,
Purushotham

Sorry,
The right query and the explain plan:
select /*+rule*/ FdnTab2.fdn, paramTab3.attr_name from fdnmappingtable FdnTab, fdnmappingtable FdnTab2, parametertable paramTab1 ,parametertable paramTab3 where FdnTab.id=52787 and paramTab1.id= FdnTab.id and paramTab3.id = FdnTab.id and paramTab3.attr_value = FdnTab2.fdn and paramTab1.attr_name='harqUsersMax' and paramTab1.attr_value <> 'DEFAULT' and exists ( select ParamTab2.attr_name from parametertable ParamTab2, templaterelationtable TemplateTab2 where TemplateTab2.id=FdnTab.id and ParamTab2.id=TemplateTab2.template_id and ParamTab2.id=FdnTab2.id and ParamTab2.attr_name=paramTab1.attr_name)
SQL> @$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/utlxpls.sql
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 651267974
| Id | Operation | Name |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | |
|* 1 | FILTER | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | |
|* 5 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PRIMARY_KY_FDNMAPPINGTABLE |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| PARAMETERTABLE |
|* 7 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PRIMARY_KY_PARAMETERTABLE |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | PARAMETERTABLE |
|* 9 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PRIMARY_KY_PARAMETERTABLE |
| 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | FDNMAPPINGTABLE |
|* 11 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | SYS_C005695 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | |
|* 13 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PRIMARY_KY_PARAMETERTABLE |
|* 14 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PRIMARY_KEY_TRTABLE |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - filter( EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM "TEMPLATERELATIONTABLE"
"TEMPLATETAB2","PARAMETERTABLE" "PARAMTAB2" WHERE
"PARAMTAB2"."ATTR_NAME"=:B1 AND "PARAMTAB2"."ID"=:B2 AND
"PARAMTAB2"."ID"="TEMPLATETAB2"."TEMPLATE_ID" AND
"TEMPLATETAB2"."ID"=:B3))
5 - access("FDNTAB"."ID"=52787)
6 - filter("PARAMTAB1"."ATTR_VALUE"<>'DEFAULT')
7 - access("PARAMTAB1"."ID"="FDNTAB"."ID" AND
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
"PARAMTAB1"."ATTR_NAME"='harqUsersMax')
9 - access("PARAMTAB3"."ID"="FDNTAB"."ID")
11 - access("PARAMTAB3"."ATTR_VALUE"="FDNTAB2"."FDN")
13 - access("PARAMTAB2"."ID"=:B1 AND "PARAMTAB2"."ATTR_NAME"=:B2)
14 - access("TEMPLATETAB2"."ID"=:B1 AND
"PARAMTAB2"."ID"="TEMPLATETAB2"."TEMPLATE_ID")
Note
- rule based optimizer used (consider using cbo)
43 rows selected.
WITH INDEX HINT:
select /*+INDEX(fdnmappingtable[PRIMARY_KY_FDNMAPPINGTABLE],parametertable[PRIMARY_KY_PARAMETERTABLE])*/ FdnTab2.fdn, paramTab3.attr_name from fdnmappingtable FdnTab, fdnmappingtable FdnTab2, parametertable paramTab1 ,parametertable paramTab3 where FdnTab.id=52787 and paramTab1.id= FdnTab.id and paramTab3.id = FdnTab.id and paramTab3.attr_value = FdnTab2.fdn and paramTab1.attr_name='harqUsersMax' and paramTab1.attr_value <> 'DEFAULT' and exists ( select ParamTab2.attr_name from parametertable ParamTab2, templaterelationtable TemplateTab2 where TemplateTab2.id=FdnTab.id and ParamTab2.id=TemplateTab2.template_id and ParamTab2.id=FdnTab2.id and ParamTab2.attr_name=paramTab1.attr_name);
SQL> @$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/utlxpls.sql
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2924316070
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | B
ytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 |
916 | 6 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | |
| | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 |
916 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 |
401 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 |
207 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| PARAMETERTABLE | 1 |
194 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PRIMARY_KY_PARAMETERTABLE | 1 |
| 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PRIMARY_KY_FDNMAPPINGTABLE | 1 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
13 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | PARAMETERTABLE | 1 |
194 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PRIMARY_KY_PARAMETERTABLE | 1 |
| 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | FDNMAPPINGTABLE | 1 |
515 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 11 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | SYS_C005695 | 1 |
| 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 |
91 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PRIMARY_KEY_TRTABLE | 1 |
26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PRIMARY_KY_PARAMETERTABLE | 1 |
65 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - filter( EXISTS (SELECT /*+ */ 0 FROM "TEMPLATERELATIONTABLE" "TEMPLATETAB
2","PARAMETERTABLE"
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
"PARAMTAB2" WHERE "PARAMTAB2"."ATTR_NAME"=:B1 AND "PARAMTAB2"."ID"
=:B2 AND
"TEMPLATETAB2"."TEMPLATE_ID"=:B3 AND "TEMPLATETAB2"."ID"=:B4))
5 - filter("PARAMTAB1"."ATTR_VALUE"<>'DEFAULT')
6 - access("PARAMTAB1"."ID"=52787 AND "PARAMTAB1"."ATTR_NAME"='harqUsersMax')
7 - access("FDNTAB"."ID"=52787)
9 - access("PARAMTAB3"."ID"=52787)
11 - access("PARAMTAB3"."ATTR_VALUE"="FDNTAB2"."FDN")
13 - access("TEMPLATETAB2"."ID"=:B1 AND "TEMPLATETAB2"."TEMPLATE_ID"=:B2)
14 - access("PARAMTAB2"."ID"=:B1 AND "PARAMTAB2"."ATTR_NAME"=:B2)
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
39 rows selected.

SQL query with Bind variable with slower execution plan

I have a 'normal' sql select-insert statement (not using bind variable) and it yields the following execution plan:-
Execution Plan
0 INSERT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=7 Card=1 Bytes=148)
1 0 HASH JOIN (Cost=7 Card=1 Bytes=148)
2 1 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'TABLEA' (Cost=4 Card=1 Bytes=100)
3 2 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'TABLEA_IDX_2' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=3 Card=1)
4 1 INDEX (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'TABLEB_IDX_003' (NON-UNIQUE)
(Cost=2 Card=135 Bytes=6480)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
18 db block gets
15558 consistent gets
47 physical reads
9896 redo size
423 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
1095 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
3 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
55 rows processed
I have the same query but instead running using bind variable (I test it with both oracle form and SQL*plus), it takes considerably longer with a different execution plan:-
Execution Plan
0 INSERT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=407 Card=1 Bytes=148)
1 0 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'TABLEA' (Cost=3 Card=1 Bytes=100)
2 1 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=407 Card=1 Bytes=148)
3 2 INDEX (FAST FULL SCAN) OF TABLEB_IDX_003' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=2 Card=135 Bytes=6480)
4 2 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'TABLEA_IDX_2' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=2 Card=1)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
12 db block gets
3003199 consistent gets
54 physical reads
9448 redo size
423 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
1258 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
3 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
55 rows processed
TABLEA has around 3million record while TABLEB has 300 records. Is there anyway I can improve the speed of the sql query with bind variable? I have DBA Access to the database
Regards
Ivan

Many thanks for your reply.
I have run the statistic already for the both tableA and tableB as well all the indexes associated with both table (using dbms_stats, I am on 9i db ) but not the indexed columns.
for table I use:-
begin
dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname=> 'IVAN', tabname=> 'TABLEA', partname=> NULL);
end;
for index I use:-
begin
dbms_stats.gather_index_stats(ownname=> 'IVAN', indname=> 'TABLEB_IDX_003', partname=> NULL);
end;
Is it possible to show me a sample of how to collect statisc for INDEX columns stats?
regards
Ivan

SQL Query with wrong result

Hello.
I have a query with LEFT OUTER JOIN that I think returns invalid results. Here are the problem details:
CREATE TABLE DOGERR(
IdDog INTEGER,
SfPdg CHAR(1),
IdVpl INTEGER,
SfVpGot INTEGER,
SfZrr CHAR(1)
INSERT INTO DOGERR(IdDog, SfPdg, IdVpl, SfVpGot, SfZrr) VALUES (1, 'S', 1, 1, '7');
INSERT INTO DOGERR(IdDog, SfPdg, IdVpl, SfVpGot, SfZrr) VALUES (2, 'S', 1, 1, '7');
INSERT INTO DOGERR(IdDog, SfPdg, IdVpl, SfVpGot, SfZrr) VALUES (3, '$', 1, 2, 'C');
COMMIT;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX DOGERR_PK ON DOGERR(IdDog);
And now the query:
SELECT D.IdDog, D.SfPdg, D.IdVpl, D.SfVpGot, D.SfZrr, T.IdVpl AS IdVplJoin, T.SfVpGot AS SfVpGotJoin, T.SfZrr AS SfZrrJoin
FROM DOGERR D
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT * FROM DOGERR WHERE SfPdg = 'S' OR SfPdg = 'S') T ON
T.IdVpl = D.IdVpl AND T.SfVpGot = D.SfVpGot AND T.SfZrr = D.SfZrr
WHERE
D.IdDog = 3
AND D.SfVpGot = 2
AND D.SfZrr = 'C';
This query should (by my understanding) return only one row in wich the joined subquery columns should be NULL. And indeed query returns only one row on Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production and on Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production:
IDDOG = 3, SFPDG = "$", IDVPL = 1, SFVPGOT = 2, SFZRR = "C", IDVPLJOIN = NULL, SFVPGOTJOIN = NULL, SFZRRJOIN = NULL
But on Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64bit Production it returns TWO rows:
IDDOG = 3, SFPDG = "$", IDVPL = 1, SFVPGOT = 2, SFZRR = "C", IDVPLJOIN = 1, SFVPGOTJOIN = 1, SFZRRJOIN = "7"
IDDOG = 3, SFPDG = "$", IDVPL = 1, SFVPGOT = 2, SFZRR = "C", IDVPLJOIN = 1, SFVPGOTJOIN = 1, SFZRRJOIN = "7"
And now the interesting part: any of the following modified versions of query works even on Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64bit Production, although modifications should not modify the result set:
-- Removed unnecessary WHERE conditions
SELECT D.IdDog, D.SfPdg, D.IdVpl, D.SfVpGot, D.SfZrr, T.IdVpl AS IdVplJoin, T.SfVpGot AS SfVpGotJoin, T.SfZrr AS SfZrrJoin
FROM DOGERR D
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT * FROM DOGERR WHERE SfPdg = 'S' OR SfPdg = 'S') T ON
T.IdVpl = D.IdVpl AND T.SfVpGot = D.SfVpGot AND T.SfZrr = D.SfZrr
WHERE
D.IdDog = 3;
-- Removed unnecessary OR condition in subquery
SELECT D.IdDog, D.SfPdg, D.IdVpl, D.SfVpGot, D.SfZrr, T.IdVpl AS IdVplJoin, T.SfVpGot AS SfVpGotJoin, T.SfZrr AS SfZrrJoin
FROM DOGERR D
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT * FROM DOGERR WHERE SfPdg = 'S') T ON
T.IdVpl = D.IdVpl AND T.SfVpGot = D.SfVpGot AND T.SfZrr = D.SfZrr
WHERE
D.IdDog = 3
AND D.SfVpGot = 2
AND D.SfZrr = 'C';
-- Removed columns from joined subquery from SELECT part
SELECT D.IdDog, D.SfPdg, D.IdVpl, D.SfVpGot, D.SfZrr, T.IdVpl AS IdVplJoin, T.SfVpGot AS SfVpGotJoin
FROM DOGERR D
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT * FROM DOGERR WHERE SfPdg = 'S' OR SfPdg = 'S') T ON
T.IdVpl = D.IdVpl AND T.SfVpGot = D.SfVpGot AND T.SfZrr = D.SfZrr
WHERE
D.IdDog = 3
AND D.SfVpGot = 2
AND D.SfZrr = 'C';
NOTE: the query itself is a little stupid but this is just to demonstrate the problem. We have faced this problem at a customer with our real-world query.
So, my question is: why different results ?
Thanks.
David

hi,
welcome to the forum,
don't have a solution, but I thought I'd let you know that the first SQL statement only returns 1 row on 10gR2
SQL> SELECT D.IdDog, D.SfPdg, D.IdVpl, D.SfVpGot, D.SfZrr, T.IdVpl AS IdVplJoin, T.SfVpGot AS SfVpGo
tJoin, T.SfZrr AS SfZrrJoin
2 FROM DOGERR D
3 LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT * FROM DOGERR WHERE SfPdg = 'S' OR SfPdg = 'S') T ON
4 T.IdVpl = D.IdVpl AND T.SfVpGot = D.SfVpGot AND T.SfZrr = D.SfZrr
5 WHERE
6 D.IdDog = 3
7 AND D.SfVpGot = 2
8 AND D.SfZrr = 'C';
     IDDOG S      IDVPL    SFVPGOT S IDVPLJOIN SFVPGOTJOIN S
         3 $          1          2 C
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE    10.2.0.4.0      Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production

How can I create a query with tables in INFOSET?

Dear Gurus,
How can I create a query with tables in INFOSET?
Just tables and fields INFOSET?
Kind Regards,

Hello
Check following SCN Article for your understanding/reference:
- [Using Infoset Query ,SAP Query and Quick Viewer|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/10eab7af-0e54-2c10-28a5-87b47adbe1a5]
Regards
JP

How can I create a query with web service data control?

I need to create a query with web service data control, in WSDL, it's query operation, there is a parameter message with the possible query criteria and a return message contains the results. I googled, but cannot find anything on the query with web service. I cannot find a "Named Criteria" in web service data control like normal data control. In Shay's blog, I saw the topics on update with web service data control. How can I create a query with web service data control? Thanks.

Hi,
This might help
*054. Search form using ADF WS Data Control and Complex input types*
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/adf/learnmore/index-101235.html

Query with subquery should return value but doesn't

When I run this SQL, it returns no value:
SELECT vfn.cat
FROM vps_fishery_ner vfn, valid_fishery vf
WHERE vfn.plan = vf.plan
AND vfn.cat = vf.cat
AND vf.permit_year = 2010
AND vf.moratorium_fishery = 'T'
AND vfn.vp_num = 211652
AND vfn.ap_year = 2010
AND vfn.plan = 'MUL'
AND vfn.date_issued = (SELECT MAX(date_issued)
FROM vps_fishery_ner
WHERE vp_num = 211652
AND ap_year = 2010);
In order to test, I take out the subquery and run it separately:
SELECT MAX(date_issued)
FROM vps_fishery_ner
WHERE vp_num = 211652
AND ap_year = 2010;
Returns 02-APR-10
Then I paste this date into the original query (using the TRUNC function, of course, since I hardcode only the DDMMYY part of the date):
SELECT vfn.cat
FROM vps_fishery_ner vfn, valid_fishery vf
WHERE vfn.plan = vf.plan
AND vfn.cat = vf.cat
AND vf.permit_year = 2010
AND vf.moratorium_fishery = 'T'
AND vfn.vp_num = 211652
AND vfn.ap_year = 2010
AND vfn.plan = 'MUL'
AND TRUNC(date_issued) = TO_DATE('02-APR-10');
And this returns the required value, 'A'.
So why doesn't the full query with subquery work, if the value that is returned by the subquery is valid and works when you just paste it in?
Thanks.

Hi,
Not sure about your question.
But you say when you uss 01-apr-10 you get the expected results.
So why dont you try using trunc on botht sides
SELECT vfn.cat
FROM vps_fishery_ner vfn, valid_fishery vf
WHERE vfn.plan = vf.plan
   AND vfn.cat = vf.cat
   AND vf.permit_year = 2010
   AND vf.moratorium_fishery = 'T'
   AND vfn.vp_num = 211652
   AND vfn.ap_year = 2010
   AND vfn.plan = 'MUL'
   AND trunc(vfn.date_issued) = (SELECT MAX(trunc(date_issued))
                            FROM vps_fishery_ner
                           WHERE vp_num = 211652
                             AND ap_year = 2010);Rememeber if you are couting on some Index to be used you might want to recheck.
IN answer to your question why it does not return with subquery included, because the TIME PART is not the same.
You yourself proved it by using the supplying only the date part.
Regards,
Bhushan

Query with date in where clause

hi,
i have build a view with join conditions from 8 tables. the data from this view is more then 100,000
when i run the query with different clause its work with some seconds. but when i put date column in where cluase it sleeps.
eg..
where unit_id = 4 and t_id = 's09' and vb like '%amb%'
works fine.
where unit_id = 4 and t_id = 's09' and vb like '%amb%' and date between dt1 and dt2
now sleep
please ......give me some suggestions

hi i have done the explain plan
the result is
Operation Object
SELECT STATEMENT ()
NESTED LOOPS ()
NESTED LOOPS ()
HASH JOIN ()
HASH JOIN ()
TABLE ACCESS (FULL) PR_PO_MST
TABLE ACCESS (FULL) PR_SUPPLIER
TABLE ACCESS (FULL) PR_PO_DTL
TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) INDENT_MST
INDEX (RANGE SCAN) ST_IND_MST_IDX
TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) ST_ITEM
Operation Object
INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) PK_ST_ITEM
now wot do do????

Oracle 10g Diff in execution plan query with binding var Vs without

We recently did 10g upgrade. In 10g, execution plan differs for query with binding var(thru jdbc etc) Vs without it as given below. For query with binding var,
it chooses poor execution plan(no index is used, full scan is done etc). everything worked fine in 9i. To rectify the problem, we have to hint query with right index,join etc. but i dont like this solution.
I would rather prefer to correct database to choose right execution path instead of eacy query level. but not sure what causes the issue.
Does anybody came across this issue? if so, Please share your experiences. Thanks for the help. Do let me know if you need more info.
1. Query without binding bar:
select * from test where col1 = :1 and col2 = :2
1. Query without binding bar:
select * from test where col1 = 'foo' and col2= 'bar'

I am not an expert but in my humble opinion it is the developer's responsability to ensure the correct explain plan is used before deploying code to production, if the explain plan returned by the DB is bad, then the use of a hint is perfectly acceptable.
Check this out: http://lcgapp.cern.ch/project/CondDB/snapshot/performance.html
Excerpt:
Bind variable peeking. If an SQL query contains bind variables, the optimal execution plan may depend on the values of those variables. When the Oracle query optimizer chooses the execution plan for such a query, it may indeed look at the values of all bind variables involved: this is known as "bind variable peeking".
In summary, the execution plan used for a given SQL query cannot be predicted a priori because it depends on the presence and quality of statistics and on the values of bind variables used at the time the query was first executed (hard-parsed). As a consequence of this instability of execution plans, very different performances may be observed for the same SQL query. In COOL, this issue is addressed by adding Oracle hints to the queries, to make sure that the same (good) plan is used in all cases, even with unreliable statistics or unfavourable bind variables.
Edited by: Rodolfo Ferrari on Jun 3, 2009 9:40 PM

How to insert some strings in a query with the clausule 'in' in a procedure

Hello fellows.
Do you know how to insert some strings in a query with the clausule 'in' in a procedure (with a variable)?.
I tell us my problem with an example:
I want to use this select but introducing a variable instead the 'value1', 'value2':
select * from table1 where field1 in ('value1', 'value2');
if I declare the variable var1 as:
TC_VAR1 CONSTANT VARCHAR2(50) := '''value1'',''value2'''
and I use it as:
select * from table1 where field1 in (TC_VAR1);
It doesn't work because Oracle takes TC_VAR1 as an all string. I think Oracle takes it as this:
select * from table1 where field1 in ('value1, value2');
If I use the data type TABLE, I don't know how to use well:
TYPE varchar2_table IS TABLE OF VARCHAR2(10);
tb_var varchar2_table;
select * from table1 where field1 in (tb_var);->It returns an error and there ins't an method that it returns all values.
A curious case is that if I have a sql script (for example script1.sh) with this query:
select * fromt able1 where field1 in (&1)
and I invoke this script as
script1.sh "'''value1'',''value2'''". It works
Can anybody helps me?.
Thanks.

Thanks to all. Really.
First, sorry for my English. It's horrible. Thank to all for understand it (my English).
I've resolved my problem with these links:
ORA-22905: cannot access rows from a non-nested table item
and
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/896356/oracle-error-ora-22905-cannot-access-rows-from-a-non-nested-table-item
At last, I have used someting like this:
DECLARE
number_table_tmp NUM_ARRAY:=NUM_ARRAY(410673, 414303, 414454, 413977, 414042, 414115, 413972, 414104, 414062);
BEGIN
FOR c1 IN (SELECT par_id, 1 acc_vdo_id FROM SIG_VIS_CAM
WHERE par_id IN (SELECT * FROM TABLE(number_table_tmp))
UNION ALL
SELECT par_id, 2 acc_vdo_id FROM SIG_ACCAO a
WHERE par_id IN (SELECT * FROM TABLE(number_table_tmp))) LOOP
NULL;
END LOOP;
END;
but first I had to create the type NUM_ARRAY like this:
CREATE TYPE subjectid_tab AS TABLE OF NUMBER INDEX BY binary_integer;
THANK YOU, GUYS. YOU ARE THE BESTS. ;-)
Edited by: user12249099 on 08-sep-2011 7:37
Edited by: user12249099 on 08-sep-2011 7:37

Tuning SQL query with SDO and Contains?

I'trying to optimize a query
with a sdo_filter and an intermedia_contains
on a 3.000.000 records table,
the query look like this
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM professionnel WHERE mdsys.sdo_filter(professionnel.coor_cart,mdsys.sdo_geometry(2003, null, null,mdsys.sdo_elem_info_array(1,1003,4),mdsys.sdo_ordinate_array(809990,2087279,778784,2087279,794387,2102882)),'querytype=window') = 'TRUE' AND professionnel.code_rubr ='12 3 30' AND CONTAINS(professionnel.Ctx,'PLOMBERIE within Nom and ( RUE within Adresse1 )',1)>0
and it takes 15s on a bi 750 pentium III with
1.5Go of memory running under 8.1.6 linux.
What can i do to improve this query time?
null

Hi Vincent,
We have patches for Oracle 8.1.6 Spatial
on NT and Solaris.
These patches include bug fixes and
performance enhancements.
We are in the process of making these patches
avaialble in a permanent place, but until then, I will temporarily put the patches on:
ftp://oracle-ftp.oracle.com/
Log in as anonymous and use your email for
password.
The patches are in /tmp/outgoing in:
NT816-000706.zip - NT patch
libordsdo.tar - Solaris patch
I recommend doing some analysis on
individual pieces of the query.
i.e. time the following:
1)
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM professionnel
WHERE mdsys.sdo_filter(
professionnel.coor_cart,
mdsys.sdo_geometry(
2003, null, null,
mdsys.sdo_elem_info_array(1,1003,4),
mdsys.sdo_ordinate_array(
809990,2087279,
778784,2087279,
794387,2102882)),
'querytype=window') = 'TRUE';
2)
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM professionnel
WHERE CONTAINS(professionnel.Ctx,
'PLOMBERIE within Nom and ( RUE within Adresse1)',1) >0;
You might want to try reorganizing the entire
query as follows (no promises).
If you contact me directly, I can try to
help to further tune the SQL.
Hope this helps. Thanks.
Dan
select count(*)
FROM
(SELECT /*+ no_merge */ rowid
FROM professionnel
WHERE mdsys.sdo_filter(
professionnel.coor_cart,
mdsys.sdo_geometry(
2003, null, null,
mdsys.sdo_elem_info_array(1,1003,4),
mdsys.sdo_ordinate_array(809990,2087279,
778784,2087279,
794387,2102882)),
'querytype=window') = 'TRUE'
) a,
(SELECT /*+ no_merge */ rowid
FROM professionnel
WHERE CONTAINS(professionnel.Ctx,
'PLOMBERIE within Nom and
( RUE within Adresse1)',1) >0
) b
where a.rowid = b.rowid
and professionnel.code_rubr ='12 3 30';
**NOTE** Try this with no index on code_rubr
null

How to write sql query with many parameter in ireport

hai,
i'm a new user in ireport.how to write sql query with many parameters in ireport's report query?i already know to create a parameter like(select * from payment where entity=$P{entity}.
but i don't know to create query if more than 1 parameter.i also have parameter such as
$P{entity},$P{id},$P{ic}.please help me for this.
thanks

You are in the wrong place. The ireport support forum may be found here
http://www.jasperforge.org/index.php?option=com_joomlaboard&Itemid=215&func=showcat&catid=9

Dude query with index

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for