:Due On" date field missing while posting with Spl GL indicator for vendor

Hello,
I am facing a problen while posting a n entry with spl GL indicator in fb01, the issue is Due On date field is missing in the screen.
I am posting an spl GL transaction for a vendor thro FB01 and after entering the posting key 39, vendor code and spl Gl indicator in line item and in next screen, the "Due ON" date field is not appearing.
Both vendor recon account and spl GL alternative account use same field status group and  checked the field status group , the due date, payments terms are made optional.
The strange thing is, when I use the same vendor with Spl GL indicator "A" , the Due ON field is missing in next screen, and when I use spl indicator " B" , for same vendor, Due On date field is appearing.
Is there any specfic field status setting for DUE ON date field for Spl GL indicator wise? or please help me how to bring due on date field in the screen when posting spl GL transaction?
Please help me on this.
Regards
Surya

Hello Surya,
To make field baseline date for payment (BSEG-ZFBDT) ready for input for
posting the down payment, the following Customizing setting is
necessary:
Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable ->
Business Transactions -> Outgoing Payments -> Automatic Outgoing Payment
-> Payment Method/Bank Selection -> Configure payment program -> All
company codes -> double-click on corresponding company code -> under
Customer -> 'Sp. G/L transactions to be paid' the letter A should be
entered.
The field "Due On (BSEG-ZFBDT)" cannot be controlled with field status.
It is contolled by field attribute of screen painter (Tcd: SE51).  If
you look at element attribute for "Due On" field, a flag for required
entry is activated.  In this case, field status has no control over
the field.
As of release 3.1G, field BSEG-ZFBDT is hardcoded in most FI screens
to be mandatory and cannot be influenced by any field status
changes. This situation is only valid when posting with special G/L
indicator (ie PK 29/39).
SAP development team has determined that this is a critical field.  The
reason behind this is that this special GL screen and the data entered
here are very important to many other programs. This data affects
liabilities and receivables where due date is necessary almost
everytime. Thus, we changed this field in this screen in order to
prevent problems in many other areas. The reason is explained further in
note 95079.
545944    FAQ, down payment, tax code, baseline date
above Field is controlled through SE51 only.
Tcode : SE51
Program (screen)     SAPMF05A
Screen number        304
Eliment list  press display.
special attributes.
BSEG-ZFBDT - Required.
Other options are below.
     The attribute "Input" can have the following values:
     o    Not possible
         The input/output field cannot be supplied with an input - that
         the screen element can only be used for outputs.
     o   Possible
         The input/output field can be supplied with an input at runtime
         the remainder of the transaction, an input is not required.
     o   Recommended (Optional Field)
         The input/output field should be supplied with an input at runt
         The system, of course, does not check immediately whether there
         been an input. During the remainder of the transaction, however
         input is necessary.
         To mark this kind of target field, the input template starts wi
         special character that is represented in the Screen Painter by
         question mark ('?'). The question mark will be suppressed only
         the field is in a table control or a step loop.
         You use the "target field", for example, if inputs cover severa
         screens and only at a later stage are subject to a common check
o   Required Field
    The input/output field must be supplied with an input at runtime.
    The system checks this property immediately, and very definitely
    when the event is processed  (PROCESS AFTER INPUT).
    So that such a required field is marked accordingly, its input
    template must begin with a special character that is represented in
    the Screen Painter by a question mark ('?'). The question mark is
    suppressed only if the field is in a table control or a step loop.
I hope above information will resolve your issue.
Kind Regards,
Fernando Evangelista

Similar Messages

  • Storage location field missing while doing GR with PO number

    When I receive goods from a PO, the storage location field missing from MIGO with 101. Material been extended with storage location and entered in PO. But sloc field totally greying out while I receive goods with PO.
    I tried other way to receive goods , but storage location disappears when I save it.
    MMBE shows stock as on order before reciept , after  I post goods, material document created but stock disappears. Not even in the plant.
    Can anyone help , please?

    <i>The following from other message thread solved my problem....</i>
    Stephen Birchall  
    Posts: 1,095
    Questions: 1
    Registered: 3/27/07
    Forum points: 1,566 
       Re: Material Classifications and Purchasing cycle  
    Posted: Apr 23, 2007 9:26 AM    in response to: Dushyant C Koth...       Reply      E-mail this post 
    Hi,
    You create the material in MM01 and select the non-valuated stock material type.
    When you create a PO for this material the system will ask you to enter an account assignment category (such as K for cost centre etc.) Indicate the GL etc that you want the costs to be posted to (Stationery, office supploes etc.).
    When the items are received, post the GR as normal (with MIGO). At GR the total value of the items will be posted to the correct financial accounts and the stock quantities will be updated.
    Then when you have consumed anything you post a goods issue (MB1A or MIGO) and this does not post anything to the financial accounts (it was all posted at GR) but it does reduce the stock figures.
    This process is ideal for ANY low value / high volume items, because the stock is managed correctly but you do not have many hundreds of tiny financial posting as each low value item is consumed.
    Steve B

  • How to populate PERNR while posting with BAPI_ACC_INVOICE_RECEIPT_POST

    HI,
    I am not able to pass Personal Number(PERNR) while posting with BAPI_ACC_INVOICE_RECEIPT_POST. Is there any enhancement which will help to solve this.
    << Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important. But the answers in the forum are provided by volunteers. Please do not ask for help quickly. >>
    Regards,
    Sini
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Nov 2, 2011 12:04 PM

    Hi,
    I am faceing this problem in standard program which is sa AirPlus Invoice Record (LARS).
    NEME:RPR_AIRP_LRS_TO_FI.
    Please help on this..
    Regards,
    Srini

  • Posting to One time Vendor with SPL GL indicator

    Hi Experts,
    I want to post to a one time vendor using a special GL indicator.
    Standard SAP does not allow this.
    Is this possible through some round about way  without a very big z development.
    if not then is there any other way out.
    Regards,

    Hi trivedy
    You can post with Spl G/l to one time vendorsalso. What you have to do is that, create a Spl G/l for One time vendors. (i.e) In T.Code OBYR, create a Spl G/l for One time vendors and enter the recon a/c for One time vendors specified in One Time Vendors master data ad try to post. Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Rajaram

  • The default account option in iOS for contacts is missing; while I have multiple account options for mail and contacts are turned on for iCloud and other accounts.

    The default account option in iOS for contacts is missing; while I have multiple account options for mail and contacts are turned on for iCloud and other accounts.  I previously was able to select between my Microsoft Exchange Contacts (work account) and iCloud (personal), but both those options are now gone.  I tried turning contacts for both off and on and rebooting, but it didn't help.  Any ideas?

    Just a guess but if the exchange account is from your employer, your employer may have installed a security profile to your device preventing you from adding or editing contacts in the exchange account by removing the Default Account setting.  You would need to check with your employer's IT department to confirm this.  You could also test this by adding a Gmail account and turning on contacts syncing with Gmail to see if the setting reappears.

  • F-58  posting using spl gl indicator G 7 clear purchase order amount

    Hi sap gurus
    Requirement is as below:
    fi -p2p-scenario- Usi ng spl gl indicator as G-which is configured 
    1. Create a Payment term for
    I. Part Payment as advance u2013 10%-on creation of PO
    II. Part payment against Proof of Dispatch; and -15%-create inbound delivery, make some advance payment
    III. Balance against receipt of material on production of Invoice, MDCC u2013 75%-at time of GR/IR-final invoice
    2. Use this payment term in the Purchase order(say rs.100)
    3. Create advance payment request u2013 F-47 for 10%-say rs.10
    4. Make advance payment for the request u2013 F-58-
    5. On Receiving the Proof of dispatch, Create an Request again for 15% - F-47-say rs.15
    6. Make payment for the request for 15% - F-58
    7. After GRN and Make LIV for 100%
    8. Make the Final payment for 75% after adjusting 10% and 15% payment line items
    in F-58 directly.
    9. Display the accounting document.
    with  one payment term,i have done the  partial payments for rs.10 & rs.15 using f-47 & f-48.Finally  
    how to clear the  payments in F-58  -the  adv amounts posted through spl gl indicator say 10 & 15 -shows cr against vendor & also the case after MIGO-for the 100 being a credit item ,how to clear the items as the amounts are getting reflected as" not assigned" in partial paym ent tab.
    Please suggest if i am wrong with flow or entries.
    Please suggest the is there any other to clear using spl gl indicators.
    thanks
    Nagesh

    please clear those open items by giving spl GL indicator in the inut screen as G.
    System will shows open items.and you can clear those.

  • SPl G/L posting Due on Date field should mandatory field .

    Hi ,
    while posting special G/l code 'G', (Advances from vendor with posting Key-29 ) I need  Due on Field as Mondatory field, (Baseline date for due date calculation
    Date to which the periods for the cash discount deadline and the due date for net payment refer. This is the case for line items in open item accounts.) it is giving other Spl G/l code except this code, it is in suppress mode. anybody can help me how get this field as reqd.( I have given same field status group and same reconciliation account also, for which I am getting it is a mondatory field eventhough it is not showing)
    Regards,
    SYReddy.

    1) use validation :  OB28
    2) tcode OB41
    A.

  • Error while posting with Tax code

    Dear All,
    I am getting the following error while i am trying to post with a tax code. Can someone tell me what could be the issue?
    Customization for RIL j_1iindcus missing in table
    Message no. 8I303
    Diagnosis
    The customization details have not been maintained for this company
    Procedure
    Please use the localization IMG or Global settings
    to maintain the company settings
    Regards
    Suresh

    Dear Suresh,
           If  you are using versions below 4.7 execute T_Code <b>J1IT</b>, go to <b> India Localization Menu->Global Settings->Company Settings</b> and add an entry for your Company Code and save.
           If you are on higher versions use the following path:
    <b>SPRO --> Logistics - General --> Tax on Goods Movement --> India --> Basic Settings --> Maintain Company Code Settings.</b>
    This should solve the issue.
    Kindly let me know if it was useful.
    Regards,
    Mary Sofia

  • Control GR Qty while posting with ref. to Inbound delivery

    Hi,
    We have an inbound delivery process where Inbound delivery is made against the PO and subsequently GR is made against the inbound delivery.
    While posting GR via MB0A with ref. to inbound delivery, the qty can be modified at GR Stage. We want to ensure that GR Qty is always equal to Inbound Deliery Quantity.
    Is there any customisation available?? Or it can only be controlled using User Exit only.
    Kindly suggest.
    Regards
    C.A. Shankar

    Hi Shankar,
    For this you have to go for seperate Doc. type for Inbound based GR.
    In the document type you can control the field as display maode in Qty field. this will not possible to change.
    SAM

  • XMLPub 5.6.3: Data fields missing in Header/Footer

    Hello,
    I am having a problem with an RTF template, where the data fields in the
    template Header or Footer that should display data do not appear at all, while
    the fixed text that is in the Header/Footer is shown.
    This template is built with the start:body/end body syntax to separate
    the fields that belong to the Header/Footer from the body of the report. The
    body has a for-each@section that works fine and a split-by-page-break at the
    end, after the Footer fields.
    I played a little bit with the template and I found out, that:
    - if I change my template not to use the start:body/end body syntax, but I use
    the Header/Footer Word functionality with the explicit field names specified in
    the header or footer, the data fields will not be displayed;
    - if I remove the for-each@section, the data fields in the Header (before the
    start:body) and in the Footer (after the end body) are displayed correctly;
    - if I duplicate in my XML file one of the elements that are in the Header and I put it
    in the child group that is displayed in the repeating section and I add another data
    field in that section, it will display both in the Header and in the repeating section;
    This very template works fine on an E-Biz instance at another customer site, but
    only here it's showing this issue.
    It also looks like a different problem than the one caused by the Microsoft
    security update. In fact, I cannot not find any "/headerr" or "/ footerr"
    strings in the template RTF. (Anyway, is there a patch for version 5.6.3?)
    Can anybody shed some light on this strange issue? Any advice?
    I am using XMLPub Desktop 5.6.3 and MS Word 2000 9.0.6926 SP-3.
    If someone wants to have a look, I've prepared a small test example to show this weird behavior.
    Thanks,
    Paolo

    ashee1,
    Please refer XMLP User Guide Chapter 9. You need to define data definitions and upload the data template to DataTemplate filed.
    Create the Template Definition and upload your RTF Template.
    Create a Report Definition in Concurrent Program/Manager and set the executable as XDODTEXE. make sure the program short name is the same as Data Definition.
    Set the output type as XML and the OPP will pick your RTF Template.
    -Ashish

  • Some data is missing while returning complex datatype from a web service

    Hi
    I am returning a complex data type from a web service. complex data type has a super class and some(not all) values from this super class are not being returned to the client. Strange part is that it giving some fields from super class and some values are not returned.
    I saw the soap response also it does not show any tag for those fields. but while creating a response i am setting some string values to those fields but i am not getting at client side.
    all the serailiastion and deseialization classes where created using ANT tasks and i have checked that all the cedec classes have been created.

    for what it's worth, the same problem was reported by one of our developers, although the string size was considerably smaller (probably less then 1 MB). According to him, soap clients generated from apache tools could connect fine and process the XML records. JDev hung. We simply changed our use case to return smaller results sets, but perhaps you could also generate your clients with WSDL2Java rather then JDev (if it is a truly a bug in JDev SOAP)? Can you add record parameters to the payload, in order to limit the results and scroll between remaining rows?

  • Error while posting with Segment

    Hi,
    I am trying to post an entry using t- code f-02.. and i am assigning a profit center to the line item. I have also assigned a segment to my profit center....
    But while posting the document i am getting the following error..
    <i><b>You do not have any authorization for segment ED and function 01
    Message no. FAGL_POST_SERVICE022
    Diagnosis
    You do not have authorization to perform function 01 for segment AA. The record type is 0.
    Procedure
    Contact your system administrator. Add the missing authorizations for object F_FAGL_SEG.</b></i>
    Please let me know what needs to be done to rectify the above error.
    Thanks and regards,
    Ankur

    Brother! after getting error, call transacxtion SU53, you will get the list that you have missed autorization
    for this,contact your basis team memeber for authorization problem.
    thanks

  • Fields suppressed when posting with FB01 and special gl-indicator

    Hello everybody,
    I have the following problem:
    I'm trying to make a vendor open item posting with transaction code 'FB01' and a special G/L-Indicator. Although the field status group of posting key and target reconciliation account is set all to optional, some fields which should be populated are suppressed, such as ZLSPR or ZBD3T.
    Does anybody know what the reason for this is?
    Thank you in advance!
    Regards,
    B

    Hello,
    If the posting keys and reconciliation account's field status variants are maintained correctly, then you should also check if you are using any screen / transaction variants
    I am completely not sure about this, but you can check this. I hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Suresh Jayanthi.

  • Document numbers missing while posting a batch of GL documents via BDC FB01

    Hi all,
    While posting a batch of GL documents using a BDC program for FB01, all the documents are posted except for a few document numbers getting skipped while posting. For instance, in posting 100 documents, if 101-200 is the document numbers expected to be generated, we are getting a list of doc. numbers from 101-185 and 187-201 thereby skipping the document number 186. But when we post another set of GL documents, the skipped doc. number 186 is first taken and remaining from doc. number 202. Could any one have comes across this scenario or somebody can help to throw some light for the reason behind this. Thanks.

    Hi Mahalingam,
    There could be various reasons for document number skipping. SAP has given various notes on this.
    Note 175047 - Causes for FI document number gaps (RF_BELEG). The note is very comprehensive and has a reference of lot many notes.
    Thanks
    Aravind

  • Multiple Date Fields (Fact Table) - Linking with Time Dimension

    I have a fact table that has multiple date columns.
    I can make a time dimension, but it has to be joined to a particular date column. This becomes difficult because of the limit in having multiple date fields reference one time dimension. I can see possibly
    creating a date table which contains all dates, link to fact as well as time dimension table. I am trying to better visualize the table layout on this one. Or are there possibily better ways of looking at this senerio
    Any idea's

    Figured this one out; going to use one time dimension - what looking too much into the details in regard to this scenerio

Maybe you are looking for