F-58  posting using spl gl indicator G 7 clear purchase order amount

Hi sap gurus
Requirement is as below:
fi -p2p-scenario- Usi ng spl gl indicator as G-which is configured 
1. Create a Payment term for
I. Part Payment as advance u2013 10%-on creation of PO
II. Part payment against Proof of Dispatch; and -15%-create inbound delivery, make some advance payment
III. Balance against receipt of material on production of Invoice, MDCC u2013 75%-at time of GR/IR-final invoice
2. Use this payment term in the Purchase order(say rs.100)
3. Create advance payment request u2013 F-47 for 10%-say rs.10
4. Make advance payment for the request u2013 F-58-
5. On Receiving the Proof of dispatch, Create an Request again for 15% - F-47-say rs.15
6. Make payment for the request for 15% - F-58
7. After GRN and Make LIV for 100%
8. Make the Final payment for 75% after adjusting 10% and 15% payment line items
in F-58 directly.
9. Display the accounting document.
with  one payment term,i have done the  partial payments for rs.10 & rs.15 using f-47 & f-48.Finally  
how to clear the  payments in F-58  -the  adv amounts posted through spl gl indicator say 10 & 15 -shows cr against vendor & also the case after MIGO-for the 100 being a credit item ,how to clear the items as the amounts are getting reflected as" not assigned" in partial paym ent tab.
Please suggest if i am wrong with flow or entries.
Please suggest the is there any other to clear using spl gl indicators.
thanks
Nagesh

please clear those open items by giving spl GL indicator in the inut screen as G.
System will shows open items.and you can clear those.

Similar Messages

  • :Due On" date field missing while posting with Spl GL indicator for vendor

    Hello,
    I am facing a problen while posting a n entry with spl GL indicator in fb01, the issue is Due On date field is missing in the screen.
    I am posting an spl GL transaction for a vendor thro FB01 and after entering the posting key 39, vendor code and spl Gl indicator in line item and in next screen, the "Due ON" date field is not appearing.
    Both vendor recon account and spl GL alternative account use same field status group and  checked the field status group , the due date, payments terms are made optional.
    The strange thing is, when I use the same vendor with Spl GL indicator "A" , the Due ON field is missing in next screen, and when I use spl indicator " B" , for same vendor, Due On date field is appearing.
    Is there any specfic field status setting for DUE ON date field for Spl GL indicator wise? or please help me how to bring due on date field in the screen when posting spl GL transaction?
    Please help me on this.
    Regards
    Surya

    Hello Surya,
    To make field baseline date for payment (BSEG-ZFBDT) ready for input for
    posting the down payment, the following Customizing setting is
    necessary:
    Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable ->
    Business Transactions -> Outgoing Payments -> Automatic Outgoing Payment
    -> Payment Method/Bank Selection -> Configure payment program -> All
    company codes -> double-click on corresponding company code -> under
    Customer -> 'Sp. G/L transactions to be paid' the letter A should be
    entered.
    The field "Due On (BSEG-ZFBDT)" cannot be controlled with field status.
    It is contolled by field attribute of screen painter (Tcd: SE51).  If
    you look at element attribute for "Due On" field, a flag for required
    entry is activated.  In this case, field status has no control over
    the field.
    As of release 3.1G, field BSEG-ZFBDT is hardcoded in most FI screens
    to be mandatory and cannot be influenced by any field status
    changes. This situation is only valid when posting with special G/L
    indicator (ie PK 29/39).
    SAP development team has determined that this is a critical field.  The
    reason behind this is that this special GL screen and the data entered
    here are very important to many other programs. This data affects
    liabilities and receivables where due date is necessary almost
    everytime. Thus, we changed this field in this screen in order to
    prevent problems in many other areas. The reason is explained further in
    note 95079.
    545944    FAQ, down payment, tax code, baseline date
    above Field is controlled through SE51 only.
    Tcode : SE51
    Program (screen)     SAPMF05A
    Screen number        304
    Eliment list  press display.
    special attributes.
    BSEG-ZFBDT - Required.
    Other options are below.
         The attribute "Input" can have the following values:
         o    Not possible
             The input/output field cannot be supplied with an input - that
             the screen element can only be used for outputs.
         o   Possible
             The input/output field can be supplied with an input at runtime
             the remainder of the transaction, an input is not required.
         o   Recommended (Optional Field)
             The input/output field should be supplied with an input at runt
             The system, of course, does not check immediately whether there
             been an input. During the remainder of the transaction, however
             input is necessary.
             To mark this kind of target field, the input template starts wi
             special character that is represented in the Screen Painter by
             question mark ('?'). The question mark will be suppressed only
             the field is in a table control or a step loop.
             You use the "target field", for example, if inputs cover severa
             screens and only at a later stage are subject to a common check
    o   Required Field
        The input/output field must be supplied with an input at runtime.
        The system checks this property immediately, and very definitely
        when the event is processed  (PROCESS AFTER INPUT).
        So that such a required field is marked accordingly, its input
        template must begin with a special character that is represented in
        the Screen Painter by a question mark ('?'). The question mark is
        suppressed only if the field is in a table control or a step loop.
    I hope above information will resolve your issue.
    Kind Regards,
    Fernando Evangelista

  • Posting to different GR/IR account based on purchase order type

    We are implementing cross company stock transport orders that require an AP invoice to be posted against the goods receipt.  Our AP department does not want the GR/IR postings to go to the account used for traded AP.  I cannot determine a method using OBYC to specify a different account based on purchase order type.  Is there a way to do this?

    Hi Jud
    You should make these posting to a cost center then..The only way you can control account postings via PO type is having a account assignement category. You can make this as mandatory filed for this PO type..
    Please let me know if your requirement is different..
    CHeers
    R K Bolla

  • Post goods issue should be done depending on purchase order acknowledgement

    Hi All,
    In vl02n when i click postgood issue, it should check whether purchase order acknowldgement field in me21n is filled then post good issuse should be done.it its not filled post good issue should not be done. for this which badi or userexit i need to use and where do i need to write the code.

    Hello ,
    you can use BADI 'LE_SHP_GOODSMOVEMENT' , this will trigger when you do PGI in VL02N , in that BADI implementation you need to raise/issue Error Message to stop PGI,That Error Should be captured in the Incomplete Log.
    for more details , please ref documentation of that BADI.
    regards
    Prabhu

  • Unlimited Indicator not copying to Purchase Order

    Hello experts,
    I'm running ECC 6.0 and am unable to solve this.  I have subcontracting info-records for materials that specify a material to a vendor, pricing, tolerances, etc.
    In the Purch. Org 1 screen of info-record view, I can see the tolerances are maintained (5% under and unlimited over-delivery for example).  The 5% under is copying when a purchase order is created for the material in question, but the unlimited over-delivery indicator is not copying.  If I clear out the indicator and maintain an actual over-delivery tolerance, it copies just fine.  Only the indicator is failing to copy from the info-record.
    Any familiarity with how to solve this issue?
    Kind Regards,
    Kelby

    Hello Kelby,
    Even if nothing is maintained in the material master plant(purchasing view) the unlimited tick should default from the PIR. PIR always has a higher priority than master as it is specific to material+vendor. The help for the 'unlimited' tick in the PIR mentions this.
    You can have a look at this note. It is very old and probably not valid for your release. However this is the only note I could find. You should probably raise an OSS message.
    https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361…

  • USING BADI TO ADD A TAB IN PURCHASE ORDER

    FRIENDS,
    CAN ANYONE SEND ME THE DOCUMENT OR WHOLE PROCEDURE FOR ADD EXTRA TAB AND FIELD IN PURCHASE ORDER  USING BADI.I AM DOING THIS FIRST TIME, SO IF SOME ONE HAVE WHOLE DOCUMENT FOR THIS , PLEASE SEND ME OR ELSE SUGGEST ME THE SOLUTION.

    Hi ,
    Please find these two BADi's which will be useful to you.
    ME_GUI_PO_CUST and MEGUI_LAYOUT
    <b>Reward points</b>
    Regards

  • Delivery Completed Indicator Not Displaying in Purchase Order Screen

    Hi,
    Here clinet system has 2 document types for service orders. In one type of service order I can see the delivery completed indicator checkbox in purchase order screen & in other type of service order I am not able to see the delivery completed indicator chekbox.
    I have checked the screen layout for both purchase order types & assignement of layout to both order types. In both screen layout types I found that Delivery Completed Indicator Checkbox as Optional Entry. System should display delivery completed indicator in both type of Purchase Order create/change/display screen. Then why it is showing in one type of service order and not in other type of service order.
    Awaiting your reply.
    Regards
    Pradip

    Hi Pradip,
    You check the for your document type which field selectio is assigned in config
    spro-MM-Purchasing-purchase order- define document types
    And then go to
    spro-mm-purchase- purchae order-Define Screen Layout at Document Level
    select the field slection which is assigned to your document type and then go details and then double click the GR/IR and then select it as optional if it is selected as hidden.
    Cheers
    Chris

  • Prevent GR with the delivery complete indicator set in the purchase order

    Dear friends,
    During GR reference to PO, if goods are received partially and the delivery complete indicator is set, the PO line item is deemed to be closed.
    However, if reference is made again to the same PO line item, GR can still be done to the item that delivery complete indicator was set.(due to there is still quantity to be received)
    Is there anyway, we could prevent reference to be made to a PO line item that has delivery complete indicator set?
    Thank you.
    Regards.

    it is by design that you still can receive material.
    See SAPs explanation here:
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/a5/63343943a211d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    The delivery complete indicator only reduces the commitment values to zero.
    If you want restrict further good receipts, then you have to reduce PO quantity to equal the received quantity and must not allow overdelvivery. Further you can enter a latest GR date, which will not allow receipt beyond this date.
    Locking the item will as well prevent further actions, but this should only be a short term solution, because the PO will still be considered in MRP runs and will never treated as beeing closed. And you will not be able to archive such POs

  • Spl gl indicator

    Hi all,
                in T.code: FB60, I'm not able to see all spl gl indicators, I need to post a credit memo with spl gl indicator. But when I'm using f-43, I'm able to see all spl gl indicators,
                  do we configure differently for FB60 transaction spl gls???

    HI Venkat,
              thanks for you advise. we can use f-41 for credit memo, in that screen it is showing all spl gl indicator it's fine. but users use FB60, because of lot of line items.. but in FB60 I'm not finding all spl gl indicators, it showing only 4 spl gl indicators, where we have more than 20.
              We use spl gl indicator for credit memo for spl purpose. We give some value of goods to supplier to produce good quality items, it may happen before po also. We can't treat it as down payment because we are not paying anything from bank. We use credit memo in this situation, but to track this type of credit memos we use spl gl indicator..
               you are well come with your suggestions, if we can go it with out credit memo, then it's fine...
    thanks are regards
    msr

  • Fico cash journal spl gl indicator possible

    Hey SAP Gurus,
    I want to show in cash journal , any payment made to an employee as a staff advance earlier, an indication, when another advance is made to the same employee (just like down payment made). By using spl gl indicator
    anand

    hi,
    Yest it is possible. You have to create a symbolic account and wage types  assigned and after that Go to transaction code OBYG and assign that symbolic account to special GL.
    Regards,
    Kapil

  • Purchase order message Re-determination after goods issue is posted

    We have a requirement to trigger special function message type (which creates a flat file) in a purchase order when goods issue for all items are posted. We have created a requirement routine for message type to check if goods issue is posted for all line items. Goods issue is posted using BAPI which uses transaction MIGO. When goods issue is posted, we want output to be triggered in purchase order. Requirement is working fine but is there any way to trigger output automatically without going to PO?
    After goods issue is posted, if we go into purchase order using ME22N then we see output proposed or if we make any changes in PO then output is proposed. This will not happen in real life though.
    Any suggestion will be highly appreciated. Thanks.
    Sanjay

    Hello,
    You can create a new output message record in NAST using RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE:
    CALL FUNCTION 'RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE'
          EXPORTING
            msg_kappl = 'EF'
            msg_objky = w_objky
          TABLES
            msg_xnast = itab_nast
            msg_ynast = itab_nast_old
          EXCEPTIONS
            no_update = 1
            OTHERS    = 2.
    Once the record is created, you may submit the program RSNAST00 to output the message.
    Thanks,
    Venu

  • Purchase order date posting problems

    Hi all,
    I have done an interface to post purchase/ sales order into sap. ive populated fields correctly into the segments and executed the fm. its posting all the data except the purchase order date in the header. i dont know why its doing dat. the field is populated into the segments and i can see it. but its not getting reflected in the order created .. can somebody help me with this. ive used date segment e1edk03 qualifier 22 field is iddat.
    thanks,
    kishore.

    Hi,
    Im using orders 05.. FM idoc_input_orders
    Create Document header date segment - E1EDK03
    *. I.e. set header level required delivery date
      e1edk03-iddat = c_edi_iddat_002.
      e1edk03-datum = date_required.  "Set the date required
      PERFORM add_segment USING c_segnam_e1edk03 e1edk03.
    Header Level Customer purchase order date
      e1edk03-iddat = c_edi_iddat_022.  " default value 22.
      e1edk03-datum = cust_po_date.
      PERFORM add_segment USING c_segnam_e1edk03 e1edk03.
    Header Level Pricing Date
      e1edk03-iddat = c_edi_iddat_023.
      e1edk03-datum = pricing_date.
      PERFORM add_segment USING c_segnam_e1edk03 e1edk03.
    Wat i could observe from fm idoc_input_orders fm , fm is not posting in the purchase order date for identifier 22.. u can have a look at it if u want.. include LVEDAF5W
    is there any way to post this date plz
    thanks

  • What is the BADI  while SAVING purchase order using me22n?

    what is the BADI  while SAVING purchase order using me22n?
    while i will save purchase order through me22n, badi should be fire what is badi for that?
    regards,
    dushyant.

    Dushyant,
    Hopefully you know how to implement the BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST now.
    The following are the codes that you can put in the method "Post".
      DATA: LW_HEADER        TYPE MEPOHEADER,
            LW_POSTED_HEADER TYPE MEPOHEADER,
            LW_VALID         TYPE MMPUR_BOOL,
            ITAB_ITEM        TYPE PURCHASE_ORDER_ITEMS,
            LW_ITEM          TYPE MEPOITEM,
            ITEM_INTERFACE   TYPE PURCHASE_ORDER_ITEM,
            ITAB_ACCT        TYPE PURCHASE_ORDER_ACCOUNTINGS,
            ACCT_INTERFACE   TYPE PURCHASE_ORDER_ACCOUNTING,
            LW_ACCT          TYPE MEPOACCOUNTING,
            LW_POSTED_ACCT   TYPE MEPOACCOUNTING,
            W_ACCT_CHANGED  TYPE C,
            W_GRANT_AMT      TYPE EKPO-NETWR,
            W_FINANCE_AMT    TYPE EKPO-NETWR,
            W_FLAG           TYPE C.
    Check if PO header data is valid
      CLEAR LW_VALID.
      CALL METHOD IM_HEADER->IS_VALID
        RECEIVING
          RE_VALID = LW_VALID.
      CHECK LW_VALID = 'X'.
    PO header data is valid
    Get the newly updated PO header data
      CLEAR LW_HEADER.
      CALL METHOD IM_HEADER->GET_DATA
        RECEIVING
          RE_DATA = LW_HEADER.
    Get the posted PO header data
      CLEAR LW_POSTED_HEADER.
      CALL METHOD IM_HEADER->GET_PERSISTENT_DATA
        IMPORTING
          EX_DATA = LW_POSTED_HEADER
        EXCEPTIONS
          NO_DATA = 1.
      IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
        CLEAR LW_POSTED_HEADER.
      ENDIF.
    Get PO line items
      REFRESH ITAB_ITEM.
      CALL METHOD IM_HEADER->GET_ITEMS
        RECEIVING
          RE_ITEMS = ITAB_ITEM.
      LOOP AT ITAB_ITEM INTO ITEM_INTERFACE.
    Check if PO line item is valid
        CLEAR LW_VALID.
        CALL METHOD ITEM_INTERFACE-ITEM->IS_VALID
          RECEIVING
            RE_VALID = LW_VALID.
        IF LW_VALID <> 'X'.
    This PO line item is not valid
          CLEAR W_ACCT_CHANGED.
          EXIT.
        ENDIF.
        CLEAR LW_ITEM.
        CALL METHOD ITEM_INTERFACE-ITEM->GET_DATA
          RECEIVING
            RE_DATA = LW_ITEM.
    Get the account interface
        REFRESH ITAB_ACCT.
        CALL METHOD ITEM_INTERFACE-ITEM->GET_ACCOUNTINGS
          RECEIVING
            RE_ACCOUNTINGS = ITAB_ACCT.
        LOOP AT ITAB_ACCT INTO ACCT_INTERFACE.
          CLEAR LW_ACCT.
    Get the newly updated PO item data
          CALL METHOD ACCT_INTERFACE-ACCOUNTING->GET_DATA
            RECEIVING
              RE_DATA = LW_ACCT.
          CLEAR LW_POSTED_ACCT.
    Get the posted PO item data
          CALL METHOD ACCT_INTERFACE-ACCOUNTING->GET_PERSISTENT_DATA
            IMPORTING
              EX_DATA = LW_POSTED_ACCT
            EXCEPTIONS
              NO_DATA = 1.
          IF SY-SUBRC > 0.
            CLEAR LW_POSTED_ACCT.
          ENDIF.
          IF LW_ACCT-LOEKZ <> LW_POSTED_ACCT-LOEKZ OR
             LW_ACCT-KOSTL <> LW_POSTED_ACCT-KOSTL OR
             LW_ACCT-PRCTR <> LW_POSTED_ACCT-PRCTR OR
             LW_ACCT-PS_PSP_PNR <> LW_POSTED_ACCT-PS_PSP_PNR.
    Account assignment was changed
    We will force this PO to go through workflow
            W_ACCT_CHANGED = 'Y'.
          ENDIF.
        ENDLOOP.
      ENDLOOP.

  • Can we create the Purchase order that using P&L account or just using account do not use cost center.

    Dear Experts,
    Could you please advise :
    1) Can we create the purchase order that using profit and loss account ? ( if yes , which kind of account assignment category we should use ?)
    2) How to create a purchase order for service charge .( just using GL account )
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    Watson

    Hi,
       May I know why you do not use cost center for consumption?
       You may create a new account assignment category in OME9 by copying K and maintain the cost center as optional. Please note that you have to maintain the item category blank and the account assignment category combination in OMG0. Now, you can use a GL account in PO which doesnt require a cost center assignment (in OBC4 against the field status group of the GL)
       You may use the same account assignment category created in the previous step with item category D, after you maintain the combination of the account assignment with item category D in OMG0.
        Please test the scenario and revert back.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Posting againt asset purchase order

    Hi,
    We are careating purchae order against assest.When u are posting f-48 with same purchase order then get following error
    " Enter value will be exceeded"
    if i given less amount against purchase order amount then simulate document .
    could u give suggestion u are very urgent
    regardsf
    cvs reddy

    Dear CVS,
    Syatem giving u the error because u r exceeding the value of the PO coz u r giving down payment thru F-48. Meaning, u decided to purchase the asset for INR1000, and against that u r giving advance of INR200, then only system will allow you to post the down payment. How can u give down payment more than value of ur asset.
    So during a document entry, put the amount less than the PO amount.
    Regards,
    Ajay Gupte

Maybe you are looking for