Duties are not calculating for new tax code

hello all,
I have some tax codes through which i am able to calculate the BED and so on. now BED rate has been changed so have created new tax code, but with that code BED is not calculating only SHEC is calculating.
What could be the reason for this pls explain me.
Thanks
Murali

Hi,
Please check whether you have maintained the Tax % Rates of the new Tax Code in the particular condition records.
With Regards
Sagar

Similar Messages

Pricing date control for new tax code rate

Hi All
I have changed the tax code rate , now have few old POs where I want to capture tax as per the new rate. But PO was picking up old tax rate as pricing date was coming as the PO creation date.
Now I changed the pricing date in PO to current date. But still tax condition is showing old pricing date and hence old rate is picking up.
Can anyone help in capturing new tax rate for an old PO.
Regds
Mukta

Hi
This Program doesn't give option to enter tax code for different line items of PO.
My PO is having multiple line items and I have to change new tax code for each line item.
Different tax rates are applicable for each line item material.
Can you please let me know how this can be happened. I changed it manually as well, but where partial GRN done , it is capturing the old tax code only inspite have changed new tax code in the particular line item.
Regards
Mukta

Import PO subsequent Debit: Taxes not calculated as per tax Code in MIRO

Dear All,
I am facing the problem while taking Subsequent debit (MIRO) of Import PO. I am using service Tax code 10.30 % .
When I entered the amount 4000 INR. It calculated the taxes 348.18 which is not correct.
I also check condition in FV13 its properly maintained.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Pawan Sarda

Hello
Thanks for ur Reply.
MIRO -- Subsequent Debit -
>Tax code - S3 ( 10.30 % Services Tax) -
>PO NO. -
> change Vendor ( Import Vendor to Domestic Vendor) -
> Amount 4000 INR -
> also change Tax Code of Line Item   -
>Simulate
Vendor A\c -
>   4,348.18 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>     338.04 INR Dr
ECS             -
>         6.76 INR Dr
HECS          -
>       3.38 INR Dr
Above process I m doing against Import PO but I m not identify why its calculated Wrong Service Tax or calculating on which base amount ?
Actual Entry
Vendor A\c -
> 4,412.00 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>    400.00 INR Dr
ECS             -
>        8.00 INR Dr
HECS          -
>      4.00 INR Dr
Edited by: pawansarda on Jan 21, 2012 11:41 AM

Drivers are not working for new BT wifi dongle

I just got BT infinity installed today. I also got the dual band AC wifi dongle 900 But it will not register on my PC. I tried installing the drivers for it but i noticed they are only for the 600 model. I know the Home hub 5 just came out along with the new dongle so is it just a case of waiting for drivers to be realesed?

Hi lightlamp,
I'm sorry about that, check out this link for the AC dongle drivers and let me know if you need any further help.
Cheers
Neil
BTCare Community Mod
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry but we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Creation of new tax codes

Hi,
I have a requirement for creation of new tax codes. I have created new tax codes in FTXP and assigned G/L accounts in OB40. This part is clear for me.
Now my questions are as under.
1.     Where do i restrict the validity date for old tax codes and validity date for new tax codes.
2     What needs to be updated in terms of condition records
3     Is there anything needs tobe update in info records for MM.
Regards
Krishna

Unless you use jurisdiction codes, and no external tax system, for
example with tax procedure TAXUSJ, there is no validity dates for the
condition records. You can see this differnce by comparing the tables
A003 without jurisdiction codes and A053 with jurisdiction codes. A053
contains the extra fields DATBI (key field) and DATAB. This is the
standard functionality.
Please have a look at the following part of note 418582:
" Changing past percentage rates has to be inhibited in order to avoid
database inconsistencies. For this reason, the functions which allow you
to transport time-dependent tax codes with percentage rates from the
past are not supported."

Derivation Rules Not Working for other company codes

Hi,
I have 5 Company codes and only for one FM was activated. now i want to activate FM for all 5 company codes. for which i have assigned the FM area to all 5 company codes. I have also assigned the derivation strategy to all 5 company codes as well. now when i post a transaction for any other company code derivation rules is not being process hence no commitment item or fund center is derived. however for the original company code for which FM was activated in the first derivation rule are working fine means system is deriving commitment item and fund center. can any one tell me why derivation rules are not working for other company codes? do i have to add Company code in source field of derivation strategy? could this be the reason? because in beginning there was no other company code so we did not included any company code field in the first place.
Regards,

Faizan,
Go to Funds Management Government> Actual and Commitment Update/Integration> Activate/Deactivate Funds Management.
In the screen create an entry for each Company Code and Funds Management Area combination.
Activate the AA Derivtn flag if you want the derivation to be called and the Update flag if you want to update commitments and actuals in FM.
Thanks
Shyam

Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome !
TREAD LOCKED SINCE IT IS DUPLICATED FROM THREAD payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi,
On the analysis, the system expects an entry in the T059Q table with
code as XX.
The reason being in the extended withholding tax we use multiple
witholding tax codes and these entries are stored in the table
with_item. And in BSEG we populate the field withholding tax code i.e.
BSEG-QSSKZ with the value 'XX'. In classical withholding tax we used to
store the code directly which is not possible with Extended withholding
tax.
As the field BSEG-QSSKZ refers to the values in the table T059Q-QSSKZ
the entry 'XX" needed in this table for the corresponding country of the
company code to maintain the correct relationship and consistent
database information.
Hence for the statistical purpose and for the internal calculations we
need an entry in the table T059Q. Could you please maintain this code
i.e. 'XX' also in the table T059Q in a test system? Then retest your issue.
This should resolve your issue.
Kind Regards,
Vanessa.

TAX not Calculating for Unplanned Delivery cost in MIRO

Dear All,
I am having an issue with Unplanned delivery cost in MIRO,
We have to do an accounting of a invoice/PO which contains in addition to actual Value the Unplanned Delivery cost also, and for which also the TAXes also applicable with ED 10% and ECess 2%,SHcess 1% ,
Now in MIRO if i want to enter these Packing and forwarding chanrges in Unplanned delivery cost, but the TAX rates is not calculating for the same.
The TAX rates are calculating only for the values other than Unplanned delivery cost.
What i want TAX also need to be calculate based on the TAX code choosen in MIRO or as flow that of PO.
I have checked in OMR2, there we have mentioned Default Unplanned delivery cost tax code as ED NIL.
Can any where in the setting we can say by default the TAX rates should calculate as that of PO or whatever TAX codes we have choosen in MIRO.
How to achive this, pl help.
Regards,
Nagaraj S

hi
the screen shot i sent is also of 4.7E
now u can check OMR2 for default tax code for unplanned delivery cost
can u show us the screen shot of the details tab of MIRO
also check in SPR>MM>LIV>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
here what value u have maintained ,we are using 2 as (2 Different G/L line)
regards
kunal
Edited by: Kunal Ingale on May 19, 2010 6:18 AM

Create new tax code for Belgium company code.

Dear friends ,
We are fighting to find a way to create a new tax code for a Belgium company that do the posting below:
Credit:       Supplier                   1000,00-       EUR
Debit:        GL Account X          1105,00        EUR
Credit:       Tax Account              105,00        EUR
Where the tax rate for the tax code is 10,5%.
Does anyone knows the config we need to do in the procedure TAXB-IVA Belgium , in order to allow SAP to post as we can see above
Tcodes:
OBQ1 / OBQ3
OBCN
OB40
FTXP
Thanks so much.
Alessandro

hi Allessandro,
Please check SAP Note 22842 - TAXB - Belgian tax calc. table - special cases, it clearly gives the configuration needs to be done in your case.
Regards
Girish BP

New tax code creation and pricing procedure for Sri Lanka

Hi,
I have one company code in India..Now I have requirement to create new plant under different company code in Sri Lanka.
Can anybody tell which tax pricing procedure is to be defined for Sri Lanka and what are different steps involved in the creation of new tax code for Sri Lanka.
Thanks & Regards
Sunil Singh

Hi Mr. Biju,
Thanks for reply...
Enterprise structure has already been decided. Everything we have copied from India for Sri Lanka and working fine except below error.
As I have already mentioned that I have copied tax pricing procedure for Sri Lanka from Taxinn then assigned to country code LK (Sri Lanka). I have created new tax code for LK (Sri Lanka) in FTXP then I have assigned the tax code with company code in SPRO Logestic General--- Basic settings.
After completeing this config, system is showing error" tax code is not defined to company code" in MIRO.
Please suggest...
Thanks & Regards
Sunil Singh

Payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below. It appears on F110 when I try to pay a vendor open item with extended withholding tax:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome

The payment method "Y" the option "payment order only" was marked?
For a withholding tax type with accumulation in a company code with extended withholding tax payment
methods that create only payment orders can´t be used. Payment orders can only be created only if there are
no tax types with accumulation involved in the paid items of the payment run.
The functionality extended withholding tax works fine for Brazil
however, you can´t use the payment order with this functionality.
Please, review your customizing for payment method 'Y" in transaction
FBZP.
Best regards,
Leonardo Vedovelli
FI Support Engineer
SAP Active Global Support

New tax code for non excisable plant

Dear all
Please suggest solution for following scenario
We created new comp. code and assign new plant, this plant is non excisable, my problem is that can I used same tax code which is I created earlier for first co. code or I have to create new tax code for new plant, these taxes I have to inventories on material, I am using tax inn and tax classification ***.sequence.
Vipin

Hi Vipin,
from my point of view you can use the same tax codes.
to inventorise the duties you have to make little change in the process.
while doing GRN if the material is excisable then the tabs will open. now you have to go to excise item tab and there you have to choose noncenvatable in the dropdown menu that is the material type.
in this way you can have the results you need.
regards,
Adwait Bachuwar

New DSO data fields are not available for transformations in the upwardflow

Hello,
There are data flow from
many source DSOs -> Target DSO -> Final DSO.
Different transformations are defined and activated with DTPs. This works fine and provides the desired results.
now new fields are added to the target DSO, final DSO and one of the source DSO.
When I now try to edit the transformations, the new fields are not part of the sources at the different stage.
The fields are available in the Data Source created out of a DSO but not directly when using a DSO as a data source.
Have anyone faced such a problem?
any solutions to this?
- I cannot delete all the other transformations as this is too much work to do and there is no time for it.
Regards
Kannan

We created ZMD_BS_MAT_OVP_LAYOUT. But the situation has not changed - the fields are not available for edit.

I was trying to sync my itouch with my new mac, and some songs won't download because they are not authorized for this computer. But even after my computer was authorized they still won't sync. How do I fix this?

I was trying to sync my itouch with my new mac, and some songs won't download because they are not authorized for this computer. But even after my computer was authorized they still won't sync. How do I fix this?

I have the same problem. It is only with tv shows and only with programs I have downloaded after the software update.
Apple support sent me the above link too....but it doesn't solve the problem...my computer is authorized and the content is in my library and will play on my Mac air, but it will not sync the tv shows, it keeps saying my computer isn't authorized for it.
No answers here, but you are definitely not alone with this issue.

Depreciation posting rules are not define for area 00 in company code

Dear Expert,
Would like to seek for help, when I run a customize report (AUC without PO not yet capitalized report the system prompt the error depreciation posting rules are not define for area 00 in company code only on the march 2011 on ward but before march 2011 the report is able to display as usual.
Between., does SAP have the standard report to list the asset which is AUC and not yet capitalized?
My version of SAP is ECC 6.0.
Kindly advise.
Regards,
Karen

Hi,
Thank you for the prompt reply, why the system prompt the error depreciation posting rules are not define for area 00 in company code only on the march 2011 on ward but before march 2011 the report is able to display as usual?
Please help.
Regards,
Karen

Duties are not calculating for new tax code

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for