Import PO subsequent Debit: Taxes not calculated as per tax Code in MIRO

Dear All,
I am facing the problem while taking Subsequent debit (MIRO) of Import PO. I am using service Tax code 10.30 % .
When I entered the amount 4000 INR. It calculated the taxes 348.18 which is not correct.
I also check condition in FV13 its properly maintained.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Pawan Sarda

Hello
Thanks for ur Reply.
MIRO -- Subsequent Debit -
>Tax code - S3 ( 10.30 % Services Tax) -
>PO NO. -
> change Vendor ( Import Vendor to Domestic Vendor) -
> Amount 4000 INR -
> also change Tax Code of Line Item   -
>Simulate
Vendor A\c -
>   4,348.18 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>     338.04 INR Dr
ECS             -
>         6.76 INR Dr
HECS          -
>       3.38 INR Dr
Above process I m doing against Import PO but I m not identify why its calculated Wrong Service Tax or calculating on which base amount ?
Actual Entry
Vendor A\c -
> 4,412.00 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>    400.00 INR Dr
ECS             -
>        8.00 INR Dr
HECS          -
>      4.00 INR Dr
Edited by: pawansarda on Jan 21, 2012 11:41 AM

Similar Messages

TAX not Calculating for Unplanned Delivery cost in MIRO

Dear All,
I am having an issue with Unplanned delivery cost in MIRO,
We have to do an accounting of a invoice/PO which contains in addition to actual Value the Unplanned Delivery cost also, and for which also the TAXes also applicable with ED 10% and ECess 2%,SHcess 1% ,
Now in MIRO if i want to enter these Packing and forwarding chanrges in Unplanned delivery cost, but the TAX rates is not calculating for the same.
The TAX rates are calculating only for the values other than Unplanned delivery cost.
What i want TAX also need to be calculate based on the TAX code choosen in MIRO or as flow that of PO.
I have checked in OMR2, there we have mentioned Default Unplanned delivery cost tax code as ED NIL.
Can any where in the setting we can say by default the TAX rates should calculate as that of PO or whatever TAX codes we have choosen in MIRO.
How to achive this, pl help.
Regards,
Nagaraj S

hi
the screen shot i sent is also of 4.7E
now u can check OMR2 for default tax code for unplanned delivery cost
can u show us the screen shot of the details tab of MIRO
also check in SPR>MM>LIV>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
here what value u have maintained ,we are using 2 as (2 Different G/L line)
regards
kunal
Edited by: Kunal Ingale on May 19, 2010 6:18 AM

Tax not calculating for parked invoices

Hi
We are using external tax system to determine taxes in SAP. When an invoice in MIRO is posted normally, the external tax system is called and tax is getting updated. Whereas, when the invoice is parked for future posting, tax is not being calculated.
Please help.

Hi Nikitha
I am able to park the document with tax. The problem is when I return to the parked document, I cannot see the tax in the field i.e., it shows 0.00 and therefore the system does not allow me to post the document.

Tax not calculating in PO

HI MM Gurus,
I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neeraj Saini

Hi, Neeraj
The purchase order you are talking of, was it created before this changes were carried out? If so, this changes will not get effected. in this case create a New purchase order.
Even after this if the error exists then check the following:
1. The condition type should be a copy of VAT condition type.
2. The condition type should of category "Tax".
3. Check there is no conflict of condition records, try to maintain condition Record using the same acces as that of VAT.
4. Use the same Tax Code as that of VAT condition type.
Hope this will correct your problem.
Regards

Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay

Hi Experts,
We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
Eg
Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
Please provide with your valuable inputs.
Thanks in Advance
Koutilya

Hi,
Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
Annual Regular income is computed as under:
Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
VK

F110-Withholding Tax Not Calculating

Dear Gurus,
For ceratin vendors in F110 system is not paying and in payment run log a msg is generated as--Internal Error:Doc Balance not zero.In one vendor there are 2 open items system is calculating WHT for one invoice correctly and showing in payment log for ther other other than posting its its showing at as a difference and sysing that doc balance is not zero.
But when I simulated the 2 invoices separately in F-53 correct WHt is shown but unable to understand why Payment Prog is not calculating for one of the documents.
My client is based out of Thailand both docs have same WHT code and and WHT Type that is at payment.Please help.
Regards
Prabin

You are saying that the invoice which are created with tax codes creates problem when it is paid through F110 that too for certain vendors, right ? Still I am asking, at the time of invoice booking (F-43), the document will have line items with payable amount, tax deductions, etc. right ? This payable amount only will be selected in F110 run. Why then you want to calculate TDS again in F110 ? With regard to your query that it is happening for certain vendors, please check the proper tax codes have been incorporated in the masters and the liable bock check is ticked.

Extended Withholding Tax not calculating

Hi
We are in ECC 6. In development system, we configured Extended Withhoding Tax for India and tested Vendor Invoice FB60. It works perfectly without any problem. It post separate line item for withholding tax as well.
We moved the configuration to Test system, where it is not working at all. All settings are as similar as development system. Vendor master record also similar as development. The document entered for testing is same as development.
Why it is not calculating Withholding tax in Test system? Is it any thing is to be done manually (like activation), table update.. in client independently?
You suggestion is most impartant.
Thanks
Venkat

Dear Venkatasubramanya,
Check the following Master data in your Test System......
1. Vendor Master Data: Check in Withholding tax tab, whether liable tick is activated or not for your Tax Codes
2. Whether your Withholding tax types are oayment type or invoice type
check in GL Master (Vendor Reco Account), Field Status Group, Whether Withholding tax fields are optional or not.
Best Regards

Withholding Taxes not calculating

Hi All,
Currently we are using ECC 6.0.
While creating Vendor we are assigning With Holding Tax codes and I created a BP with this Vendor.
Now I created a Lease-In Contract for this BP, but system asking tax types and tax group is mandetory under Posting Parameters tab, but those tax types are belongs to Sales and Purchase tax codes.
So I am unable to do with holding tax calculations and I tried Field status for for Tax types and tax group I did't find.
Please advice me how I can achive this and is there any configuration settings to do with holding tax.
Regards,
CM.

Hi,
While assigning withholding tax code in vendor master for payment postings we should only update the withholding tax type. We must not update the withholding tax code. The reason being system always automatically calculate taxes even in the case of final payment.
You can use report RFWT0010 to adjust the withholding tax information to the relevant withholding tax types. Hope this helps.
Thanks
Neel

Tax not Calculated on Activity created through Service master

Hi;
For different TAX values on Multiple line items in P.O, i am using Service Master to Create an Activity, and call that activity in my Service entry sheet.
Now When Service entry sheet (P.R) is adopted in P.O it doesn't calculate tax.
Any valuable information on this would be highly appreciated.
Regards.

Hi,
In the purchase order the taxes are calcuated at item level. In the
service entry sheet the taxes are calculated at service level.
The non-deductible input taxes both in the purchase order and on the
service entry sheet serve for the commitments structure and for
information.
The tax actually paid with the invoice is later more precisely
redetermined by the invoice verification in the system.
You can set the Customizing alternatively that the
taxes are calculated at service level instead of at item level. This
setting is particularly useful if different services of an item are to
be taxed differently as it is the rule in countries with
jurisdiction-dependent taxes. Please check your settings in transaction ML100.
In this connection, refer to Notes 498878, 495316 and 371595.
Regards,
Edit

Tax not calculating in MIRO within a date range.

Hi Experts ,
We have created a tax code and assign its values in condition types under two separate Key Combination.
1) Tax Classification : 4% ( Non Validity) , in access sequence exclusive indicator is set aganst it.
2) Tax Code : 4% (Valdity - Sept - till 9999), Exclusive indicator is not set against it.
Issue is that when i create a PO ( at any date) system is picking up the taxes.
Nom at the time of MIRO , if i post the MIRO before sept. system is allowing me to do so and calculate taxes correctly.
But when i change the date to Sept the system does not calculate taxes.
Even though the Tax Classification has more priority in access sequence compared to tax code , i am failed to understand why system is not calculating taxes.
I have tried deleting conditions in tax code key combinations but still system is not calculating taxes in MIRO,
Pls guide.
Regards
Honey

Hi Ramesh ,
i have done the same . Maintained he condition record via FV11. but system is not calculating tax for sept. month in MIRO.
In PO tax calculation is perfect but in MIRO it is not calculating tax.( ticked calculate tax option also).

MIRO:Taxes not calculating

Hi Gurus,
I am using TAXINN
Noe PO is done with all cond records
GR is also fine
J1IEX is also captured & posted
But while posting MIRO,when I click on 'Calculate Tax'    the taxes are not calculating,
Plz suggest
Rgds
Vinay

Hi,
Go to OB40
maintain Cenvat Clearing account in for all taxcodes.
for E.g.
maintain ECS for Edu Cess, BED and J16 for H Edu cess
all enteries must be like
During Excise Invoice Credit
                                    Cenvat Account           Dr.
                                    Cenvat Clearing                      Cr.
            During Invoice Verification
                                    Cenvat Clearing          Dr.
                                    GR/IR Clearing           Dr.
                                    Vendor Payable                      Cr.
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Tax not calculating In FB60.

we are using Taxinn maintain plant/vendor/material in Fv11   for condition JVRD using single tax code V1. all VAT calculation   for diffrent tax rate on single tax code. In MIRO vat tax calculating but not In FB60.
We upgrade The PRD up patch level 21 prior to up grade patch tax calculation was working in FB60 .
we are maintain plant & material at line level, also put business places in fb60.
we maintain Table J_1IT030K GL plant wise & business place wise with along with account key JP5.
what configuration i have to check for calculation tax in fb60.

Dear Raj,
Please check the below suggestion that can be useful:
Point 4 of SAP note 952289 gives a clear idea about this issue.
It is as follows.......
4. For direct posting to FI through the transaction FB60/ FB70, the ta
calculation is not taking place.
Answer: Ensure that the following steps are carried out -
1. Insert the condition table 003 in the access sequence JTAX/JST1
one above the last step.
2. DO NOT MARK IT AS EXCLUSIVE.
3. Create new set of TAX codes to be used in FI only.
4. Maintain condition records for these tax code using the table 003,
through FV11 with the appropriate tax percentage.
Further make sure that the said tax code is present in FTXP and the
same is assigned to your respective company code,in the following
customising node:
SPRO > Logictics general > Tax on goods mvmt > India > Determination
of excise duty > Asssign tax code to company code..
This solution is relevant for all direct tax related postings through
FI.
I hope this helps.
Mauri

Current condition is different than group conditon,tax not calculating

Hi,
I am working on a sales order for which tax is not getting calculated.For tax calculation puprose,a third party tool,vertex is being used. When i debug,i found that the RFC function module(which calculates the tax ) is not getting called. The code is written in such a way that the RFC will be called only if if the current condition type is also the group condition type for which all the items are currently being processed, but this condition is not satisfying. Can any one please tell me about the possible causes for this condition failure. I need the sollution badly.
Thanks & Regards,
Narendra Kumar

Hi,
As suggested by YADAV, use TCODE V/06 and click detail button and goto second window where u will find GROUP CONDITION do check it .
Regards
AJIT K SINGH
HAPPY TO HELP U

Duties are not calculating for new tax code

hello all,
I have some tax codes through which i am able to calculate the BED and so on. now BED rate has been changed so have created new tax code, but with that code BED is not calculating only SHEC is calculating.
What could be the reason for this pls explain me.
Thanks
Murali

Hi,
Please check whether you have maintained the Tax % Rates of the new Tax Code in the particular condition records.
With Regards
Sagar

Pennsylvania Local Service Tax Not Calculating correctly

I received a TUB for a local service tax area that is going from a $10 tax to a $52 LST( tax type 084). When I review the BSI interface/ script , I see an additional tax code of a 9 which means to substitute the lump sum for the pro-rated LST amount which is for authorities that have a $10 or less tax.
The LST is showing up as a lump sum of $52 for /484. In PA the LST is prorated per pay period of $2 per pay period. I need to remove the Additional Tax Code. Once I do this, the tax will calculate as it should in the amount of $2.00.
Please advise how to remove this additional tax code of 9. I am referencing TUB # 179.
Thanks,

Tax Authority - East Petersburg Borough (PAKV). Tax Type 84, Local Service Tax. When I maintain PAKV on the IT 0207 record it calculates the local withholding.
I am testing TUB # 205. This particular tax authority is adopting local service tax (84) instead of OPT (51). Effective immediately.
When we first loaded the TUB and I ran payroll for an employee, the tax area was not pulling in the payroll results. I did the steps I listed in my post and I now get the tax authority pulling in but the $2 bi-weekly deduction is not coming out. I also noticed, the taxable earning is showing $0 thus the tax is showing $0.
Thanks for your response,,,

Import PO subsequent Debit: Taxes not calculated as per tax Code in MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for