Dynamic creation of two records in IT19 from input in IT16

Hi all
I am working on a dynamic action to do like this:
When a person is hired through a PA40 one enters an IT0016 (at this point predefined with probationary period 9), saves and by doing this creates an IT0019 with Task Type "U9" and a date of task 9 months later. This I believe is calculated by adding together the probationary period in IT0016 and the begin date into the variable PROBEND.
Now the next step in my Dynamic action is a copy of the fist one, creating yet another IT0019 record. Only this time the Task Type is 36 and here comes the trouble: I want the PROBEND for this part of the action to be begin date + 6 months. Question is, can this be done by using a W indicator for the step setting P0016-PRBZT='6' before making the PROBATION routine? I cannot make it work.
My code is as this (simplified):
IType 0016, field PRBZT, FC04
***first 0019 record ***
P some tests
F PROBATION
I INS,0019,U9
W P0019-TERMN=PROBEND
***second 0019 record ***
P Some other testing
W P0016-PRBZT='006'
F PROBATION
I INS,0019,36
W P0019-TERMN=PROBEND
It DOES make two records - one of each type, but the date of task is not calculated correctly for the second record. Anyone has an idea how to crack this one?
Regards
Jesper

Hi Brother
I think u r calling the Dynamic action after u save infotype 0016 in both the cases. So how can we save something in an infotype which is just saved, I mean u r using a field of 0016 in the dynamic action,but remember that we are calling dynamic action after 0016 gets saved.
So for changing the dates in 0016 just play around with CONTR Feature, To default the contrat elements and modify the dynamic action...
Hope this resolves ur query
Thanks and regards
Mohammed Azeem

Similar Messages

Dynamic Creation of Columns based on Date from variable screen

Hi Experts,
Is it possible to create the Columns dynamically?
My requirement is,
for eg if the user selects the dates from 23Aug2008 to March2010 in variable screen, then in the output I should be able to drilldown and see the individual months data i.e., from Aug2008 to March2010 (20 columns).
If the user selects March2009 to November2009 (9 columns)
Is it possible to display in output like this?
Is it possible to create columns dynamically(based on the period selected) in the output?
Kindly help.
Thanks,
Guru
Edited by: hi2guru on Aug 3, 2010 12:07 PM

Hi Shanthi,
Thanks for replying.
And sorry If i havnt elaborated my requirement.
I used a new structure->new selection with 0CALDAY restricted by 0I_DAYS periodFrom/to variable in Columns.
Its displaying the total of the selected period in a single column.
My requirement is to drilldown the same into individual months values in seperate columns.
If the selected period has 8 months, then 8 columns. if the selected period has 15 months, then 15 individual columns.
Pls help me.
Guru
Edited by: hi2guru on Aug 3, 2010 12:24 PM

Logic Script (Copying records while save from input screen)

Hi Gurus,
How to handle below requirement in script logic:
Input screen column = Time (5 years)
User want to input forecast data in current year and same data should be copied over to rest of the 4 years.
I am new to Logic Script!
Thanks.

Another option is to add 4 properties to TIME dimension: SHIFT1,SHIFT2,SHIFT3 and SHIFT4 and fill them with members:
2014.01 -> 2015.01 2016.01 2017.01 2018.01
2014.02 -> 2015.02 2016.02 2017.02 2018.02
... etc
Some maintenance work...
The code will be simple and without FOR/NEXT loop:
*WHEN CATEGORY
*IS FORECAST
*REC(EXPRESSION=%VALUE%,TIME=TIME.SHIFT1)
*REC(EXPRESSION=%VALUE%,TIME=TIME.SHIFT2)
*REC(EXPRESSION=%VALUE%,TIME=TIME.SHIFT3)
*REC(EXPRESSION=%VALUE%,TIME=TIME.SHIFT4)
*ENDWHEN
Vadim

Loading ODS to Cube Creates two records

I am using one ODS to load data into Cube 1 and Cube 2.
Cube 1 is a delta load and Cube 2 is a full load. The design is that Cube 1 will have all the daily updates from R/3 and Cube 2 will be loaded with a snap-shot of the ODS data at midnight. When the snap-shot is loaded into Cube 2 an update rule will change characteristic infoobject "Snap-Shot date" to the current date. So, cube 2 will contain all the nightly snap-shots with different dates
The initial load of Cube 1 runs fine and it loads 1488 records. When I run Cube 2's full load it add 2976 records (double). When I look at the Cube 2 data I see one record with the Snap-shot date that is blank and one with the current date in it.
I have to click on a key figure that has an "Update Type = Addition" to get to the characteristics update rule for "snap-shot date". Is the fact that the key figure is additive causing the creation of two records?
Regards,
Mike...

Yes, that was my problem I didn't have the update rule applied to all the key figures. When I put in the update rule and I saved it, I said "no" to the pop-up "Apply to all key figures".
I just re-edited the update rule and this time I clicked "yes" apply to all key figures. Load is working fine now...
Thanks,
Mike...

Dynamic link confusing two separate AE compositions in PPro from different projects

I am using CS5 Master Collection for Windows 7 (64 bit) on an HP Pro desktop (Intel core 2 duo, 6Gb RAM). The tower has two hard drives installed (no RAID). CS5 is installed on the original C drive along with the OS, but the working files, footage etc are all on the larger, secondary F drive.
I am working on a DVD project consisting of several seperate PPro projects. Each project has been colour corrected in AE using dynamic linking. Recently two of my projects suddenly became mixed up, by which I mean the video (not the audio) from one AE composition in one project has taken the place of another in another project. The clip remains the same length, but the link apears to be referencing the wrong clip during playback. Interestingly, there are two clips on the track above the affected clip that fade out and in at either end, during the dissolves between clips, the correct footage plays. It is only when the clip plays by itself that the problem occurs. The next clip also has the same error, though the problem only occurs for half the clip and then suddenly corrects itself. Just to be clear, All clips have been rendered, there are no more than two video tracks on the sequence, and I have tried replacing the composition from the asset menu (in which the clip plays back correctly), but the problem remains in the sequence.
I hope that descrition is clear enough. My guess is some kind of file path error in the dynamic link, perhaps due to the separate hard drive. But I really wouldn't know. I'm very pressed for time right now and I'd prefer not to go against workflow and re-edit a new composition in AE, I would also like to understand what is going on in case it happens again.
Any help with ths problem would be appreciated,
J

Thanks Colin, I tried what you suggested with both the AE Project that it should be referencing and the AE project it is erroneously referencing but both failed to fix the issue. Its as if a hidden clip were laid over the top of the one I want to play. Frustrating.
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:47:03 -0600
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Dynamic link confusing two separate AE compositions in PPro from different projects
    Re: Dynamic link confusing two separate AE compositions in PPro from different projects
    created by Colin Brougham in Premiere Pro CS5 & CS5.5 - View the full discussion
It's not the comps that are the problem; it's the project file names themselves. You can have all the comps in a project named the same thing, and it'll be fine, but naming projects incrementally is an issue. After Effects includes a versioning function (Save and Increment) that will create a new AE project file with a serial number, e.g. AE Project 01, AE Project 02, etc. This is all well and good if you're just working in After Effects, but Dynamic Link gets confused and will usually start looking at the later project file for comps. That will just create a big mess, as you've found. Changing the names of the project files won't help things relink automatically properly, but it can help you fix things. Make all your DL AE comps offline in your Pr projects, and name your AE projects in a manner that is not serial (give them more random names). Select your offline AE comps, and right-click > Link Media, and point to the new AE project. Things should link up correctly then--but if they don't, you'll just have to remove all the AE comps from your Pr project, reimport the comps from the newly-named AE project, and replace them. It's a pain but it'll probably just keep getting worse if you don't.
     Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/3988711#3988711
     To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/3988711#3988711. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
     Start a new discussion in Premiere Pro CS5 & CS5.5 by email or at Adobe Forums
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

Combine values from two records in one query

Hello.
Is it possible to combine two record - only one column value?
With one query we get these results:
A____B____C____D____E_______F_______G______H
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
28___84___P___16____________1____02.06.09___1
28___84___p___8_____________1____02.06.09___1
28___84___S___16____________1____02.06.09___1
28___84___T___12____________1____02.06.09___1
28___84___1___137___________1____02.06.09___1
28___84___5___18___66,42____1____02.06.09____1
28___84___6___14____________1____02.06.09___1
28___84___8___17___214,2____1____02.06.09___1
If there is a record with column C value 'p', then column value 'D' should be added to record with C value 'P' and 'S': result should be like this:
No 'p' record and values (D column) for 'P' and 'S' should be a summed by 8 from record 'p'.
A____B____C____D____E_______F_______G______H
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
28___84___P___24____________1____02.06.09___1
28___84___S___24____________1____02.06.09___1
28___84___T___12____________1____02.06.09___1
28___84___1___137___________1____02.06.09___1
28___84___5___18___66,42____1____02.06.09____1
28___84___6___14____________1____02.06.09___1
28___84___8___17___214,2____1____02.06.09___1
And this should be restricted to column A value.
Any idea?
Thanks.
Edited by: DejanH on Jun 2, 2009 11:39 AM

OK, that's a messy requirement, here's one for 'p' but no 'P' (and 't' but no 'T'), and you can expand that for others yourself.
WITH test_data AS (
SELECT 28 A, 84 B, 'p' C, 8 D, NULL E, 1 F, TO_DATE('02.06.09','DD.MM.YY') G, 1 H FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 28 A, 84 B, 'S' C, 16 D, NULL E, 1 F, TO_DATE('02.06.09','DD.MM.YY') G, 1 H FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 28 A, 84 B, 'T' C, 12 D, NULL E, 1 F, TO_DATE('02.06.09','DD.MM.YY') G, 1 H FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 28 A, 84 B, '1' C, 137 D, NULL E, 1 F, TO_DATE('02.06.09','DD.MM.YY') G, 1 H FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 28 A, 84 B, '5' C, 18 D, 66.42 E, 1 F, TO_DATE('02.06.09','DD.MM.YY') G, 1 H FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 28 A, 84 B, '6' C, 14 D, NULL E, 1 F, TO_DATE('02.06.09','DD.MM.YY') G, 1 H FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 28 A, 84 B, '8' C, 17 D, 214.2 E, 1 F, TO_DATE('02.06.09','DD.MM.YY') G, 1 H FROM DUAL)
-- end test data
SELECT td1.A, td1.B, td1.C,
     CASE WHEN td1.C IN ('P', 'S') THEN NVL(td1.D,0) + NVL(td2.D, 0) ELSE td1.D END D,
     TO_CHAR(td1.E * 100, 'fm99990,09') E, td1.F, td1.G, td1.H
   FROM test_data td1
   LEFT JOIN (
SELECT A, SUM(D) D
     FROM test_data
    WHERE C= 'p'
    GROUP BY A) td2
    ON (td1.A = td2.A)
WHERE C != 'p'
GROUP BY td1.A, td1.B, td1.C, CASE WHEN td1.C IN ('P', 'S') THEN NVL(td1.D,0) + NVL(td2.D, 0) ELSE td1.D END, TO_CHAR(td1.E * 100, 'fm99990,09'), td1.F, td1.G, td1.H
UNION
SELECT td1.A, td1.B, UPPER(td1.C) C,
     SUM(td1.D) D,
     TO_CHAR(td1.E * 100, 'fm99990,09') E, td1.F, td1.G, td1.H
   FROM test_data td1
WHERE td1.C in ('p', 't')
GROUP BY td1.A, td1.B, UPPER(td1.C),TO_CHAR(td1.E * 100, 'fm99990,09'), td1.F, td1.G, td1.H
ORDER BY 1
         A          B C          D E                  F G                  H
        28         84 1        137                    1 02-JUN-09          1
        28         84 5         18 66,42              1 02-JUN-09          1
        28         84 6         14                    1 02-JUN-09          1
        28         84 8         17 214,20             1 02-JUN-09          1
        28         84 P          8                    1 02-JUN-09          1
        28         84 S         24                    1 02-JUN-09          1
        28         84 T         12                    1 02-JUN-09          1
7 rows selected.

Passing Record type parameter from one session to other session

Hi,
I have a package.procedure, in that I am calling custom workflow, inside this workflow again I am calling
same package.procedure (Its an recursive call)
I need to pass record type parameter in this package.procedure.
I tried with global variables but Workflow starts its new session so it losses all variables.
Now I am going with creation of Custom table.
Please advice, is there any way other than creation of Custom table.
I mean can we pass Record type parameter from one session to other session without creating table.
Regards
Rohit

Al-Salamu Alikum We Rahmatu Allah We Barakatu...
want this place from to be passed as a parameter to the shipping bill form..... using web.show_documentwhy don't u think of just passing data parameter or global parameters from one form to another
Pass global variable between two forms.
Hope this helps...
Regards,
Abdetu...

Merging two records in a single record for the same matnr,werks and bwart.

Hi I have a requirement to merge two records into one single record using the quantity field from MSEG table.
I am selecting two records from the table MSEG. Now for these two records i have to add the quantity values into one variable.
Then there should be only one record for the same matnr,werks,bwart.
Any suggestion would be appreciated.
Regards,
Amit

hi,
You can COLLECT statement only if all non key fields are numeric.
This statement Adds all such fields and give us a single record.
Regards
Sumit Agarwal

Pulling out two records at a time

I have a TABLE with multiple records in it, of which i want to pull out two records at a time (as if they were one record), of those records that meet the WHERE criteria. Order is not important. Basically, i have a TABLE of things that wither need processing or have been processed already. I can process two at a time. (In a related search, that i am not up to yet, i can do 20 at a time.) How would i go about doing that?
My first thought was a CTE with ROW_NUMBER() RN, using CONNECT BY RN = PRIOR RN + 2, and have a sub-query (or joined TABLE) pull out the second record:
WITH Moo (SELECT ... ROW_NUMBER RN FROM Table WHERE ...)
SELECT ..., (SELECT ... FROM FROM Moo Moo2 WHERE Moo2.Id = Moo.Id + 1)
FROM Moo CONNECT BY Id = PRIOR Id + 2;
Or a join. Is there a better way to approach it?

Pretty much everything you just said is wrong.
>
I generally keep away from CURSORs, as i want the DB to handle the set processing for me, as opposed to a CURSOR which tells the DB how to do it's job.
>
If you do any DB queries then you are using cursors. You have the wrong idea about them. All result sets are obtained using a cursor. A cursor does NOT tell a DB how to do a job; that is what the query and execution plan do.
>
(And, Tom Kyt's mantra of "You should do it in a single SQL statement if at all possible") But that's just a rule of thumb.
>
No - that isn't a rule of thumb. That is exactly what you should do if possible which is what I said. But I also said
>
Well the general use is to use SQL instead of PL/SQL but since you already need to use a function you might as well make that function as efficient as possible.
>
If you are already using a function then you should get the most bang for the buck from it and make it as efficient as possible.
>
If the CURSOR is the most efficient, so be it. But as you point out, if i'm already going to use a CURSOR, i might as well do all the work in the CURSOR LOOP. Why bother switching contexts.
>
All queries are done using cursors. It isn't a question of whether they are more efficient; it is the only way possible. I think you are referring to a user creating an explicit cursor and performing explicit manipulation of that cursor. That isn't normally what you want to do.
A cursor loop is the slowest way to process results especially if all you are doing is row-by-row processing to perform essentially SQL-related work. PL/SQL should be used for the transactional part of the processing. In your case that transactional use is consolidating two records together for specialized processing.
As for context switches if you perform any PL/SQL you are going to have a context switch: functions, procedures, triggers. The function you already planned to use would have caused a context switch. What I am saying is that if you are going to perform a context switch then you want to maximize the amount of work (transactional work) done in the PL/SQL engine so that you minimize the context switching.
You still haven't explained exactly why 2 records at a time is any more ideal than 1 or if you could also process 50, 100, or 10000 at a time. Is the limit what needs to be passed somewhere else? What is the reason for a max of two? What exactly are you doing with the data to prepare it before you have to pass it on?
Bulk collect processing is more efficient, with fewer context switches, if you process 20, 50, or 100 records in the loop at a time.
See Chap 13 Using Pipelined and parallel Table Functions in the Data Cartridge Dev Guide
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28425/pipe_paral_tbl.htm

Dynamic creation of ComponentUsage

Hi people,
I want to reuse a view (ViewA) in different views (ViewB, ViewC, ViewD).ViewA has a quite complex logic, so it is necessary to outsource this view. Not only the logic, but also the count of UIElements and contextelements is quite large, for this I don't want to implement this part redundant in the views A, C and D.
I have to use ViewA in a table in the TablePopin UIElement. Every line of the table should have its own instance of ViewA. Is that possible?
My idea is it, to put the view in an own component. For every tableline I need an instance of the componentUsage. My problem is now, that I'm not able to create at runtime a ComponentUsage and at designtime I don't know how many instances I need. Is it possible in webdynpro to create dynamic instances of ComponentUsage?
If you know an other way, that prevents me from implementing the view and its logic more times, please tell me!
Thanks in advance,
Thomas Morandell

Hi Thomas,
just for clarification. Principally it is possible in Web Dynpro to dynamically create new component usages of the same type like an existing, statically declared one. This means after having defined a component usage of type ISomeComp (component interface definition) you can dynamically create new component usages which all point to the same component interface definition ISomeComp:
wdThis.wdGetISomeCompUsage().createComponentUsageOfSameType();
But this dynamic creation approach implies, that you must also embed the component interface view of this component usage to the view composition dynamically; and this is (unfortunately) quite cumbersome and complicated based on the existing Web Dynpro Java API (it is not yet optimized for a simple dynamic view composition modification.
Additionally, like Valery pointed out, the dynamic creation of new component usages is not compatible with table popins.
Regards, Bertram

Dynamic Creation of UI in adobe forms??

Hi Experts,
I need to create a dynamic interactive form and dynamic UI elements in the interactive form.
As per my requirement I need to display a pdf and I will be getting values from the RFC's. I need to show the form segments and the UI elements only when there's a data from the RFC else not. I am unable to understand whether this requirement needs generation of the UI elements dynamically or I can do it statically as well.
The form thus generated will be having data from the RFC which based on the data quantity may exceed to n number of pages.
In case it needs dynamic creation can you suggest me please how to achive it in interactive forms?
Helpful answers will be appreciated.
Warm Regards,
Gaurav

Hi,
subForm1:-
Flow content
Allow page breaks
Place: following previous-----> This means when you are repeating the subform the previous one should be followed.
Say you have a table and have 3 columns in it.
After 1st column is completed, the next column should come with 1st comun
After: Continue filling parent--->Continously fill the data with the parent element
Repeat sub form min count is 1 : Minimum of 1 line item will be printed
Height: Expand to fit is true.: If the field height is increased it automatically expands.
For help in Adobe Press F1 or Goto Help--> Adobe Designer Help in Adobe Designer
After installing Adobe Designer, goto the specific folder
C:\Program Files\Adobe\Designer 8.0\EN you can get sample documents.
For help press F1 after opening designer.
Sub Form1: Content--> Flowed, Flow direction --> Top to bottom
Binding --> Check the checkbox Repeat Subform for each data item
Subform 2: Content --> Positioned, No pagination No binding settings changes needed.
Hey i forgot to mention the Header Subform where you create all these subforms should be flowed.
Try it once like this and lte us know
Edited by: Sankar Narayana on Oct 3, 2008 5:06 PM

Dynamic creation of date in selection variant

Hi All,
I have a Z program for updating a field in BOM item. One of the input field in the report is "Valid From Date". Actually the current date is automatically fetched through a function module and it is defaulted in that field.
Our client is using selection variant for ease of use. The problem here is old date in the selection variant is replacing the current date. I want current date to be created automatically during insertion of variant also. How can i solve this problem. Is there any selection variable inside the variant for dynamic creation of Date?
Thanks
Sankar

As I know there is no setting for this. For any std or Z report variant function with L should act same way...anyway you discuss with your ADABer.
See the help for variables
Selection Variables
The following three types of selection variables are currently
    supported:
o   Table variables from TVARV
        You should use these variables if you want to store static
        information. TVARV variables are proposed by default.
o   Dynamic date calculations:
        To use these variables, the corresponding selection field must have
        type 'D' (date). If the system has to convert from type T to type D
        when you select the selection variables, the VARIABLE NAME field is
        no longer ready for input. Instead, you can only set values using
        the input help.
        The system currently supports the following dynamic date
        calculations:
        Today's date
       From beginning of the month to today
       Today's date +/- x days
       First quarter ????
       Second quarter ????
       Third quarter ????
       Fourth quarter ????
       Today's date - xxx, today's date + yyy
       Previous month
o   User-specific variables
       Prerequisite: The selection field must have been defined in the
       program using the MEMORY ID pid addition. User-specific values,
       which can be created either from the selection screen or from the
       user maintenance transaction, are placed in the corresponding
       selection fields when the user runs the program.
The SELECTION OPTIONS button is only supported for date variables that
   fill select-options fields with single values.
i.e means we can do that with D also.

Automatic creation of info record

Hi All ,
In my case, Automatic creation of info record is active during creation of PO and in case of standard PO, price is automatically coming during creation of PO
But in case of consignment PO, Price is not coming automatically.
Please help... thanks in advance

HI,
In Consignment PO, Price (Condtion tab) won't be there.
As per the concept of Consignment, stock will be in our premise but ownership of the stock will be with the vendor. Only when we consume from the consignment stock it will come under our valuation & the price maintained in the consignment info-record will used in this case.
Refer help.sap documentation for more details on Consignment.
Thanks & Regards,

Dynamic Table with two columns

Hi!
i have to create a Dynamic Table with two columns having 5-5 links each with some text...... three links r based on certain conditions....they r visible only if condition is true...
if the links r not visible in this case another links take it's place & fill the cell.
links/text is coming from database.
i am using Struts with JSP IDE netbeans
Please help me
BuntyIndia

i wanna do something like this
<div class="box_d box_margin_right">
          <ul class="anchor-bullet">
          <c:forEach items="${data.faqList}" var="item" varStatus="status"
                    begin="0" end="${data.faqListSize/2-1}">
                    <li>${item}</li>
               </c:forEach>
          </ul>
          </div>
          <div class="box_d">
          <ul class="anchor-bullet">
          <c:forEach items="${data.faqList}" var="item" varStatus="status"
                    begin="${data.faqListSize/2}" end="${data.faqListSize}">
                    <li>${item}</li>
               </c:forEach>
          </ul>
          </div>
wanna divide table in two columns....if one link got off due to condition other one take it's position...
I have created a textorderedlist
Bunty

Is it standard behavior for VL10A/table VEPVG to show two records when a Sales Document has been blocked?

Hi Experts,
Is it standard behavior for VL10A to show two records when a Sales Document has been blocked? Their only difference is the field Delivery Block. In VL10A, the first record has a delivery block of BLANK, the second has 99.
Here's how to replicate the issue.
Create sales order.
When you check VL10A, the Sales document is there.
Change sales order field (RSD) in VA02, Save.
When you check VL10A, there are now two records, one has a blank delivery block, the other has 99.
The expected result here is that after changing in VA02, there will be only 1 record in VL10A and it should have delivery block of 99.
Assumptions:
1. We know that VL10A retrieves its records from VEPVG. The problem is, in VEPVG, delivery block is a key field. So I think that during VA02, when the delivery block of 99 is assigned, this creates a record in VEPVG instead of updating the existing one. Is this standard behavior, and are my assumptions correct?
Thanks in advanced experts. Appreciate your prompt response,
Jack

Hello Jack,
This is the standard behavior. When I check in our system, I too can see two entries but with different good issue date and delivery date and the block is specific to good issue date, delivery date.
So there is no problem in it. try to give the delivery date which includes two table entries delivery date and execute the transaction VL10A.
Regards,
TP

Dynamic creation of two records in IT19 from input in IT16

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for