Easy One: Constructor of Child Classes

Hello. I am new to the java language and i have a question.
I want to make a Class Vehicle which should have the following variables
static int id;
static long color;
static String brand;
static Boolean rented;
static String location;
Now i want to make a Child class called 'Car' which should have the .location set to "land" by default.
I want to also make a Child class of 'Car' called 'Bus' .
Now the problem is with the constructors. I want that when i create a class Bus that the .location is set to "land" automatically and not with user input. This means it will call the constructor of 'Car' and not 'Vehicle' which sets .location to "land"
I tried to do so but it tells me 'Constructor Car() was not found' .
I want the constructor of Car define the .location="land" but the constructor of Bus will not have the .location argument because
it is set to "land" by default?
Please help !
thanks
code follows:
package map_exercise;
* Title:
* Description:
* Copyright: Copyright (c) 2003
* Company:
* @author
* @version 1.0
public class Vehicle {
static int id;
static long color;
static String brand;
static Boolean rented;
static String location;
public Vehicle(int myid,long mycolor,String mybrand,Boolean isrented,String mylocation) {
this.id=myid;
this.color=mycolor;
this.brand=mybrand;
this.rented=isrented;
this.location=mylocation;
package map_exercise;
* Title:
* Description:
* Copyright: Copyright (c) 2003
* Company:
* @author
* @version 1.0
public class Car extends Vehicle {
public Car(int myid,long mycolor,String mybrand,Boolean isrented) {
super(myid,mycolor,mybrand,isrented,"land");
package map_exercise;
* Title:
* Description:
* Copyright: Copyright (c) 2003
* Company:
* @author
* @version 1.0
public class Bus extends Car {
public Bus(int myid,long mycolor,String mybrand,Boolean isrented) {
}

I agree with NadjaS about the general remarks on the use of static vs. instance variables.
Anyway, if you really need to keep the variables at the class definition level, you can initialize them through the static initializer constructor within the "Car" class itself, i.e. something like this:
public class Car extends Vehicle {
    static {
        location = "land";
}without necessarily calling the super constructor.
The message "Constructor Car() was not found" is due to the fact the the only Car class constructor has four parameters - hence a completely different signature - and there is no constructor without parameters at all.
Hope this will help.
Bye

Similar Messages

  • Child class not called at run time labview

    I'm developing a large application using a few Class.
    In development mode, everything works fine.  When I build the application and run the executable, one of my child class is not called at all.  In some of the methods of that child class I have checked the option in "Window Appearance" to show the Front Panel when VI Load.  The VI show it self but is not executing.  The run button is in a state that indicate there is no top vi calling it.
    I have played whit Execution : Preallocated clone reentrant execution and General: Separate compiled code from source file.
    And I set them back to default.
    Two days lost trying to figure what append to my application.
    Please Help.
    Nitrof

    Hi Nitrof,
    Check out this excerpt straight from the NI Training Manual on object-oriented programming (image attached). There's a chance that the child classes aren't being included in the build. They need to be included somewhere in the application VI so that the Application Builder knows to include the class in the build.
    Also check out this forum that sounds like it's describing a similar problem: http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Problems-with-dyna​mic-class-load-in-executable/m-p/2139116
    Hope this helps!
    Alexandra
    National Instruments
    Applications Engineer
    Attachments:
    Forum1937225.png ‏146 KB

  • Why does the child class need to implement the parent classes constructor?/

    As I was playing around with some code I came across this point :
    First Class
    public class A {
         public int x;
         A(int i){
              x=i;
              System.out.println("A is initialised");
    }Second Class extending it :
    public class B extends A{
         private int y;
       // Why do I need this constructor to call parents constructor?
      // My guess is so that when i make an object of class B referring to class A it should make sense?
         B(int i) {                     
              super(i); 
              y=test;
    public static void main(String args[]){
          A a = new A(1);
          A b = new B(1); make an object of class B referring to class A it should work!!
          B c = new B(2);
          B d =(B) new A(2);  --> gives class cast exception!
    }I am little confused here, Can someone throw more light on it.
    Thanks

    You don't override constructors. However, every class, in it's constructor, must call some constructor from the class it's extending. In most cases this is simply super(). However, if your class does not have a default constructor (i.e. you've declared any other constructor, or the sub class does not have access to it, I.E. you've declared it private) then you must include a call to some other constructor in the super class. The constructor in the subclass does not have to be the same as the super class one, but you do have to invoke a constructor from the super class. I.E.
    class A {
      A(int i) {}
    class B extends A {
      B(String b) {
        super(0);
    }

  • A non abstract child class must implement all pure virtual function of  parent abstract class in c++

    Hi,
    In Indesign SDK there is a class  IActionComponent having two pure virtual functions:
    virtual void
    UpdateActionStates(IActiveContext* ac, IActionStateList *listToUpdateGSysPoint mousePoint = kInvalidMousePoint, IPMUnknown* widget = nil) = 0;
    virtual void
    DoAction(IActiveContext* ac, ActionID actionID, GSysPoint mousePoint = kInvalidMousePoint, IPMUnknown* widget = nil)= 0;
    But, the child class
    class WIDGET_DECL CActionComponent : public IActionComponent
    implements only UpdateActionStates function and not DoAction function.
    There is no compilation error and the code is running fine..HOW
    Can some one please explain me?

    Oops!!! there is a small correction in my C++ program. The JunkMethod is being called from the constructor...like the following code.
    #include <iostream.h>
    #include <stdlib.h>
    class Base
        public:
            Base()
                cout<<"In Base Class constructor..."<<endl;
                JunkMethod();
            void JunkMethod()
                TestAbsFunc();
            virtual void TestAbsFunc()= 0;
    class TestAbstract:public Base
        public:
            TestAbstract()
                cout<<"In Extend Class constructor..."<<endl;
            void TestAbsFunc()
                cout<<"In TestAbsFunc...."<<endl;
    int main()
          TestAbstract test;
          return 0;
    }You can see the change in the constructor of the Base class. JunkMethod is being called, just to bluff the compiler to call the virtual method (so that it won't crib saying that abstract method cannot be called from the constructor). When Java is supporting this functionality without giving any errors, C++ gives errors when you call an abstract method from the constructor or fails to execute when I do some work around like this. Isn't it a drawback of abstract funcationality supported by C++ (I'm not sure if it's a drawback or not)
    Regards,
    Kalyan.

  • Child-class refering to other Child-classes

    Hello!
    I am an inexperienced Java-programmer who have recently given the following some thought: if I have a Parent class that creates an instance of another class, and that class, in turn, needs to refer back to a sibling instance in the Parent class, what is the best way to go?
    I can see possibilities with creating a static method in Parent, that returns a reference to whatever other child class you might need to access. Also, I guess you could send the Parent-class to the child class as an argument, and save it in a reference-variable to use when you need to use one of the Parents non-static methods. Probably there are more possible ways.
    But what I'm asking is; which way is the most "legitime" when it comes to OOP? Surely it's butt-ugly to have a load of static methods in a Parent-class, or to propagate the Parent class through levels and levels of childs and grand-childs.
    If I haven't made myself clear -- I have doubts about my English :P -- I'll try to illustrate my question with a short code-snippet below
    Class Parent
    Child myChild;
    Sibling mySibling;
    public Parent()
    myChild = new Child();
    mySibling = new Sibling();
    // ... more follows
    Class Child
    public Child()
    // Here, I want to somehow access "mySibling" in class Parent
    // ... more follows
    // ... more follows
    Class Sibling
    // ... more follows
    }

    As I tried to illustrate with my code snippet, the children are of separate classes. I could yet again clarify my point by giving a more concrete example, one that's the actual cause of my question.
    I have a class [MainClass] that extends JFrame, implements MouseListener, and calls its own constructor in a main()-method.
    The constructor then goes about creating the Frame's interior by creating instances of JPanels and, in one case, an extenden JPanel called CardPanel (implements ActionListener). So now we have three JPanels (including the extended) active:
    JPanel cardPanelButtons; // is the topmost panel in the frame, and lets the user switch between the different cards in the CardPanel. It contains three buttons that are in a ButtonGroup to make sure only one of them is pressed at any one time.
    CardPanel cardPanel; // is centered in the frame, and contains every interactive item in the application, except for the buttons in the cardPanelButtons-JPanel
    JPanel statusPanel; // contains a non editable JTextArea for status-messages
    CardPanel creates three panels in its constructor, and adds these to itself.
    In one of these panels (that are selected by the user, clicking on the buttons in the cardPanelButtons-JPanel) there is a "Search"-button that when pressed, performs a Database-search and then pops up the next card in the CardPanel with the apropiate query result filled in and displayed. This is all good, however for GUI-purposes, this action requires the apropiate button in the cardPanelButtons-JPanel to be "pushed" automatically when this switch between cards take place. Since these buttons are unknown to CardPanel, it needs to somehow reach them, which is where I'm starting to wonder what the best way around this is.
    Should I have the CardPanel-constructor take the parent class as an argument, and access the buttonGroup by a public getter-method in MainClass. Or should I static a public getter-method in the MainClass, letting me ignore to pass on the MainClass for reference. Should I ignore extending JPanel to create CardPanel altogether, and add everything straight into the JFrame from a MainClass-method?
    What is the most correct way, or the way programmers usually go about this type of problem?
    (In order to make myself perfectly clear, this reply is quite extensive. I apologize if I got a bit carried away..)

  • Calling father from the child class?

    Hi...
    And I want to learn how to:
    public class FATHER{
    int SAMPLE=0;
    FATHER(){
    Child mychild=new Child();
    class Child{
    Child(){ 
    // I am child and I want to set my father's(who created me) SAMPLE var...
    here is a small example.. I could not reached fathers variables in the child.. there must be an easy way to do that ..
    Thanks ...

    Actually, why would that happen?Because the father tries to create a child, itwill
    become recursive.
    KajOh, so it will become recursive due to the
    constructor in the Father class?Nope, because of the ctor of the child class because it'll call either
    implicitly or explicitly the father's ctor again.
    kind regards,
    Jos
    ps. see for yourself:class Father {
       private class Child child;
       public Father() {
          System.out.println("father ctor");
          child= new Child();
    public class Child extends Father {
       public Child() {
          System.out.println("child ctor");
    }

  • Class override, how to create the child class and then the base class

    I started to write a program for a smart DMM, the problem is every version of the DMM the company change the communication commend.
    My idea is to write a child class for every DMM version and every SubVI of the child will override the base class SubVI.
    My problem is, i want first to create one child class and after i will see every thing is work,  start to create the base class. that way i will see if am thinking the right way.
    My question is
    How can i create a child class and then create the base class and configure the SubVi of the child class to be Override of the base class?
    I tried to search in the property of the class but i didn't see nothing.
    Thanks
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    This can be done and I've done it on occasion.
    You simply create the base class with the dynamic dispatch methods you require (connector panes need to be identical to thos of the child class).
    Then set the inheritance of the class to inherit from this base class.  If your method is defined as a dynamic dispatch method in the parent, you'll most likely now have some errors (unless your child method was already DD in which case you might just be OK already).
    To change the inheritance of a class, right-click the properties of the class in your project and select properties.  I believe the ineritance tree is at the lower end of the properties.  Click on the "change inheritance" (or something similar) to choose the class from which you now wish to inherit.
    Say hello to my little friend.
    RFC 2323 FHE-Compliant

  • NewInstance & constructor of base class

    When I instantiate a sub class directly (using new), the code in the constructor method of both base and sub classes run.
    When I instantiate using java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance, only the sub class's constructor method is invoked. Is there a way to force running the constructor method of the base class as well?
    Thanks & Regards.

    when I tried to build a simple code to show the problem, I realised that the problem is somewhere else - Still not solvable by me - Please help.
    Irrespective of whether new or Constructor.newInstance -
    The constructor method with appropriate signature is invoked from child class.
    The constructor method without any arguments is invoked from parent class. - This is the reason for my original problem.
    In the attached code, the variable xyz is not getting assigned proper value (from the argument a).
    public class Mainer {
       public static void main(String args[]) throws ClassNotFoundException, NoSuchMethodException, InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException, IllegalArgumentException, java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
           int inArg = 5;
           System.out.println("With new");
           ChldClass chld1 = new ChldClass(inArg);
           chld1.m1();
           System.out.println("With Constructor.newInstance");
           java.lang.reflect.Constructor ArgsConstructor;
           Class[] argsClass = new Class[] {int.class};
           Class chld2Class = Class.forName("ChldClass");
           ArgsConstructor = chld2Class.getConstructor(argsClass);
           Object[] argsObject = new Object[] {5};
           ChldClass chld2 = (ChldClass)ArgsConstructor.newInstance(argsObject);
           chld2.m1();
    class PrntClass
        int xyz;
            public PrntClass(int a)
                xyz = a;
                System.out.println("Int Arg Constructor within Parent Class <<<" + xyz + ">>>");
            public PrntClass()
                System.out.println("Default Constructor within Parent Class");
         public void m1()
              System.out.println("M1 of Parent Class");
    class ChldClass extends PrntClass
        public ChldClass(int a)
            System.out.println("Int Arg Constructor within Child");
         public void m1()
              System.out.println("Value of xyz "+xyz);
         public void m2()
              System.out.println("M2 of ChldClass");
    The result displayed:
    With new
    Default Constructor within Parent Class
    Int Arg Constructor within Child
    Value of xyz 0
    With Constructor.newInstance
    Default Constructor within Parent Class
    Int Arg Constructor within Child
    Value of xyz 0
    Thanks & Regards.

  • Setting final Instance variables in Child Classes

    Hello:
    Is it possible to declare (not initialize) a final variable in an abstract parent class and set it in a non-abstract child class.
    An example for clarification.
    I have an abstract parent class (call it P) and two child classes (call them (C1 and C2). There is common processing that goes on in P. This processing uses a variable called x. C1 will set x to equal 10 and C2 will set x to equal 20. Can I declare x final in the abstract class P and set it in C1 and C2
    This is impossible right? I know some other languages allow this behavior so I just wanted to make sure that Java does not support it.
    Thanks
    Johnny

    Why don't you just try it out? Though I'm pretty sure it won't work, as it should expect all constructors of the abstract class to set it. But you could either let there be an overridden method that returns the appropriate value for the sub-class:
    abstract class P
      abstract protected int getTheValue();
    class C1 extends P
      protected int getTheValue() { return 10; }
    class C2 extends P
      protected int getTheValue() { return 20; }
    }

  • Copy multiple dispatch vi to new child class

    Hi, I have just started with LVOOP and while I'm pretty sure I have a good understanding of the overall theme, there is one problem I foresee if I continue.
    Situation:
    BoardType is parent of classes CC2600 and CC1300. Currently the child classes are just empty place holders.
    Almost all the methods in the child classes will be of dynamic dispatch type (currently only one).
    From what I understand a dynamic dispatch must be available in all child classes plus parent class in order to work as intended. 
    Problem:
    If I would go forward and implementing LVOOP this would require approx 30 dynamic dispatch vis for each class. I can right click but for just these two children that's 60 + 30 vis I must create manually. I would much prefer just to create a template once and then just basically drag and drop 30+ new vis for each new class that is created.
    Is there a way I can define a set of template dispatch vis in the parent BoardType and have them added to all the child classes? 
    I tried the save as copy, but the problem is that I still have to replace the connector pane to represent the new owning class.
    If it helps here's a very basic block diagram of what's going to happen, just after Reset.vi there will be a lot of other dynamic dispatch vis.
    Thanks in advance.
    Michael

    From the OP it sounded like you were literally just copying from the parent.
    What I tend to do is finish one child class and then save a copy to a new name and change the internal data (if required) and DD vis (if required).
    I do agree though that these kinds of operations could be hugely simplified using helper programs.  Give the link provided by others a try.
    Shane.
    Say hello to my little friend.
    RFC 2323 FHE-Compliant

  • Preventing Child Class Dependency when using conditional disable to specify Class in Development Environment

    Hello
    I am developing an application which I would like to execute on both normal and real-time systems using LabVIEW Proffesional Development System 2012 SP1
    To control how the application interacts with the user, I have created a class which defines the type of user-interface behaviour which should allow me to have nice dialog boxes when the system is executing on a windows machine and have no dialog boxes (or other non-Real-Time friendly code) when operating on a real-time target.
    The parent class is the code that is suitable for Real-Time and the child class is the one with dialog boxes.
    To control which class is loaded, I have a conditional disable structure. This will work fine when the application is built into a executable or real-time executable but the problem arises when I want to use the code during development on the real-time target.
    I find that with the application under a real-time target (RT PXI), the correct conditional-disable case is activated so the parent class is used, but the child classes are also listed under the dependancies - I pressume this is because they exist on the block diagram in the disabled case of the conditional disable diagram.
    This means that I cannot deploy the code to the Real-Time target as it is unhappy with the child class code - even though this will never be run.
    To save posting my real project, I have created an example with a Parent and Child class and a Conditional Disable Flag called "CLASS" to demonstrate the problem.
    If you run Test.vi you will see that the Child class still gets locked (i.e. is a dependancy) during execution even though it is not called.
    So - basically my question is: Is there anything I can do about this or will I just have to do-away with the conditional disable and just put the correct Class constant on the block diagram during testing?
    Thanks in advance
    John.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    Example Proj.zip ‏18 KB

    I feel your pain.  I ran into a similar problem a short time back.
    Apparently Official NI stance is that you need to put a conditional Disable structure IN EVERY ONE OF YOUR CLASS VIs.  In the Windows VIs, you simply have an empty conditional disable case with the windows code in an appropriate other case and vise versa on the RT.
    I too would much prefer the method you describe...
    Say hello to my little friend.
    RFC 2323 FHE-Compliant

  • How to reduce protected accessor to package accessor in child class

    I have made one abstract class ( say Parent), with 2 abstract methods (am1() & am2()) , with protected accessors. A class extends parent class (say Child). Now Child class need to keep accessors type of protected method as protected, as we cannot reduce the scope. Now as per my design, I need to create many subsclass (say SubClass) of Child class. But I don't want subclass of Child class to have access of method am1() & am2(). SubClass is declared in different package. But as I cannot reduce the accessor type from protected to package, I am not able to restrict the access of am1() & am2() to Child class and SubClass should not able to access am1() & am2().
    Do we have some way to design above scenario?
    Thanks in advance
    Praveen

    You can't reduce visibility.
    A subclass is supposed to be able to do everything the superclass can. If you'd restrict visibility of certain methods or fields, you break that contract.

  • Parent class not waiting for child class to finish

    hi,
    i have class a and method x in class a which calls class b. its fine till there. but before my class b's action is completed, in which i have to choose a file and display those files in jtable, the remaining lines in method x getting executed. what do you think the problem is.
    i.e. my parent's class method is completely getting executed before the child class (frame) returns the result and is closed. where do u think the problem.
    please help.

    i dont know if i made myself clear. i am giving my code below.
    class A{
    btnClick{
    pnlProductsImport _pnlProductsImport=new  pnlProductsImport(dataSource,config,parent,importFile);
    _pnlProductsImport.setVisible(true);
    _pnlProductsImport.show();
    getProducts()
    here its showing my pnlProductsImport class screen and before I close that screen, getProducts method is getting executed. as I know, the control passes from class A to pnlProductsImport at show() and when its closed, it will execute remaning lines i.e getProducts, but in this case, it shows the subclass, and immedietly, executing remaining lines. but its also fact that my subclass (pnlProductsImport) implements Runnable, but thread starts only after some time when I click on one of the buttons on the screen.... and i want that getProducts() method to execute only when subclass closes completely.
    thanks

  • Constructor of derived-class has to call constructor  of super-class?

    In java, constructor of derived-class has to call constructor of super-class? there is no way to omit this step?

    Correct. If you do not explicitly call the constructor, a call to the no-arg c'tor, super(), is automatically inserted.
    It would be a mess to have it any other way. You'd be creating objects that are not completely initialized. They'd be in an invalid state.
    Constructor rules:
    1) Every class has at least one ctor.
    1.1) If you do not define an explicit constructor for your class, the compiler provides a implicit constructor that takes no args and simply calls super().
    1.2) If you do define one or more explicit constructors, regardless of whether they take args, then the compiler no longer provides the implicit no-arg ctor. In this case, you must explicitly define a public MyClass() {...} if you want one.
    1.3) Constructors are not inherited.
    2) The first statement in the body of any ctor is either a call to a superclass ctor super(...) or a call to another ctor of this class this(...) 2.1) If you do not explicitly put a call to super(...) or this(...) as the first statement in a ctor that you define, then the compiler implicitly inserts a call to super's no-arg ctor super() as the first call. The implicitly called ctor is always super's no-arg ctor, regardless of whether the currently running ctor takes args.
    2.2) There is always exactly one call to either super(...) or this(...) in each constructor, and it is always the first call. You can't put in more than one, and if you put one in, the compiler's implicitly provided one is removed.

  • Can defualt inherited the Super Class constructor to sub class ?

    Hi,
    is it passible to inherit the super class constructor by defualt when extends the super class.
    Thanks
    MerlinRoshina

    Constructor rules:
    1) Every class has at least one ctor.
    1.1) If you do not define an explicit constructor for your class, the compiler provides a implicit constructor that takes no args and simply calls super().
    1.2) If you do define one or more explicit constructors, regardless of whether they take args, then the compiler no longer provides the implicit no-arg ctor. In this case, you must explicitly define a public MyClass() {...} if you want one.
    1.3) Constructors are not inherited.
    2) The first statement in the body of any ctor is either a call to a superclass ctor super(...) or a call to another ctor of this class this(...) 2.1) If you do not explicitly put a call to super(...) or this(...) as the first statement in a ctor that you define, then the compiler implicitly inserts a call to super's no-arg ctor super() as the first call. The implicitly called ctor is always super's no-arg ctor, regardless of whether the currently running ctor takes args.
    2.2) There is always exactly one call to either super(...) or this(...) in each constructor, and it is always the first call. You can't put in more than one, and if you put one in, the compiler's implicitly provided one is removed.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Execution of several statements

    I want to execute several statements in one turn. After reading the API I found out that I must use execute(String sql) to perform these multiple statements. But when I put this text below in the argument list of Statement stmt = new Statement(); stm

  • MP3Plugin

    Hi I am writing a Mdeia Player application and want it to support MP3 files. I have installed the latest JMF and then installed the MP3Plugin that is also provided. I ahve followed all of the intructions provided but now when I try to open a Clip obj

  • Getting the Latest status with respect to DATE entered

    Hi guyz, kindly help me in this scenario: I have a DSO and a CUBE.... DSO: cust status code status date RAW DATA cust               status code               status date payer1                    1                      12/31/2013 payer1              

  • Is it possible to change the 'accessibility' messages of a button?

    I have buttons that control navigation in a subform.  These buttons are one instance - then addInstance as related subforms are added. I would like to be able to control the accessibility message (since we use it more as a hover/mouseover) based on t

  • Widescreen resolutions LOWER than 1680x1050?

    I have a MSI Geforce 7600 GS AGP 256mb graphic card and a Samsung 226BW monitor. My problem is, that I can't get any widescreen resolutions that are LOWER than the native 1680x1050. This is a problem, because I don't own the fastest machine (a 3ghz P