EKPO-EGLKZ - Setting the "Final Delivery Flag" on a transport order

When entering a goods issue to a transport order (Movement type '351'), the Final Delivery indicator cannot be checked, because it does not appear on the screen. I looked in configuration and I cannot find where to 'turn on' that field on the screen. Does anyone know how to 'turn on' that field?
In a business example, Plant #1 created a transport order for a qty of 3000 feet of cable from Plant #2. When Plant #2 issues the cable to the transport order, they will only be issuing 2900 feet, because that is all they have on that reel. They will not be issuing any further cable. They want to consider this item complete. How does Plant #2 indicate this will be the final delivery. Can they do that from the movement type 351 screen?

if you are talking about stock transport order, you can set the final delivery indicator for that particular STO as follows:
Go to me22n, give your STO number, in the item data below there is a tab called delivery, inside that, there is a checkbox against final delivery, you can check that box for that particular material in the STO, but once you check it, you can do further goods issue for that material.......
Reward, if helpful....
Thanks,
Noopur

Similar Messages

Set the final invoice flag for a purchase order

I want to know how to set the final invoice flag for a purchase order.
I tried BAPI_PO_CHANGE but it is giving me error.
Help me.

Hi,
I think ur BW report shows the cleared Invoice no. The second invoice no. might not have been extracted to BW system. Check your order no. in Cube whether it has two invoice nos.
Regards,
Suman

Partial Delivery when the complete delivery flag is checked in Sales Order

We do the ATP check in APO when we create a sales order in R/3. We have "complete delivery" flag checked in Sales Order. But when we create batch orders say may be of 20, one of 20 is confirming with partial delivery.
We thought the issue is with ATP locking and we increased the re-attempts, but invain. We still have this partial confirming problem.
Appreciate your co-operation.
Thanks,
Sarath.

Have you maintained the following setings in R3:
Material Blocks in R3:
MenuPath: SAP Customizing Implementation Guide ® Sales and Distribution ® Basic Functions ® Availability Check and Transfer of Requirements ® Availability Check ® Availability Check with ATP Logic or Against Planning ® Define Material Block For Other Users
Global Settings in APO for Availability Check:
MenuPath: SPRO>APO>GATP>General Settings>Maintain Global Settings for Product Availabilty
Questions for you:
(1)R3--Does the Availability CHecking Group you are using for your material and the initiator-A has the block checked.
(2)APO-- Has the TQA box checked in the global settings for Availability in APO
(3)Also what happens when AVAILABILITY CHECK is done manually for one of the partial confirmed order with Complete Delivery indicator set.
Regards
Kumar Ayyagari
null

Can anyone give me a lit of ALL the final cut pro's in chronological order?

Can anyone give me a lit of ALL the final cut pro's in chronological order?
Thank-you

Everything you need is here:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Cut_Pro_X

Error in creating delivery document from stock transport order

hi sd gurus plz help i m nt able to create delivery in vl10b from stock transport order me21n after giving shipping point and po number also. can u help me out and can u tell me how to maintain copy control from stock tarnsport to delivery docu.

Hi Debesh,
The settings for Delivery type for STO is maintained using the following path:
Materials Management>Purchasing>Purchase Order>Set up Stock Transport Order>Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule . Here you assign the Delivery type to Stock Transport order (with reference of Suplying Plant)
For creation of STO for delivery creation use T-code- VL04. Enter the Relevant Shipping Point and the Delivery Creation Date. Also tick mark the option Purchase order. If you already have a Purchase order enter the no.
System will show the details of the STO here by using the Main Menu > Delivery> Create Deliveries you can create the Delivery against the STO. Then by using the VL02n option you can do the Picking / PGI for the Delivery.
Hope the above helps you.
REWARD if it helps you!!
Regards,
Ajinkya

The dependent requests are in different transport orders

Hi,
When i save a particular query, and then try to reopen it, i get an error saying "The dependent requests are in different transport orders".
Because of this error, my query becomes uneditable.
Could anyone help me out with this??
Thanks.

The best way to transport the query is to go to RSA1->Transport connection and collect all dependent objects like formula variables..calculated key figures..etc in the same transport.

Setting the No Limit flag in BAPI_PO_CREATE1

Dear All,
I created an ABAP to execute BAPI_PO_CREATE1 in a loop to create multiple PO's and I am encountering a wierd problem. I set both no_limit & no_frlimit flags to 'X' in structure bapiesuhc when creating a PO. It appears only the first PO has both "no limit" checkboxes set when I look up the PO in ME22 under the Service specifications screen. Any subsequent PO's created do not have the "No limit" checkbox set in the overall limit section. The other "Nolimit" checkbox under the the "Other Limit" tab is being set correctly.
I do a BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT after each BAPI call and the code to load the Bapi structures each time are the same. I am am at a loss to explain what happened.
Any ideas out there?
Thanks!

Try this... and you are good to go!
Flag the field ITEM_INTVL with X in the structure BAPIMEPOHEADERX. But do not pass any value for this field in BAPIMEPOHEADER.
By doing this, PO is created with user defined item numbers instead of standard config sequence.
Check this note 418683.
Thanks,
SKJ

Workflow: Setting the high priority flag

Hi,
Does any one know how to set the priority for the email notification?
(Eg: In microsoft outlook red exclamatory mark for high priority)
I tried the option priority in notification and message but its not giving the desired output(i.e Flag).

I know you can set the priority on the task.
If you click on the User step and go under Routes and Priority, you can change the priority and you will see a different icon in Workspace.
I'm not sure this will change the priority on the email though.
Jasmin

Set the Unicode check flag for all programs.

Hello friends,
We are now upgrading our ecc6 system to unicode. The problem is that all our programs
are not flaged for unicode checks and there for have syntax errors. I now how to mark
this flag for a single program but how can I do it to all programs?
I realy need your help.
Thanks in advance,
Gershon.

Hi Gershon,
In general, transaction UCCHECK is designed to cover all Unicode adaptations needed. The guide called
u201CRequirements of ABAP Programs in Unicode Systemsu201D, which can be found via:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b02d3594-ae48-2a10-83a7-89d369b708e5
gives customers a comprehensive description of possible errors. Please also have a look at the docu provided directly in transaction UCCHECK. In addition, SAP notes 1322715 (search for UCCHECK) and 1319517 (point 8.) might be helpful.
Please note that customer programs have to be adapted - simply setting the Unicode flag works only for the objects with a green traffic light in UCCHECK .
Best regards,
Nils Buerckel
SAP AG

FM/Bapi to set the Equipment deletion flag

Hi guys!
Does someone know a FM or Bapi to set the deletion flag for an equipment.
So it's should be the same functionlity like in IE02 --> Equipment --> Functions --> Deletion Flag --> set
thanks!

easiest way:
CLEAR: bdcdata, bdcdata[].
PERFORM bdc_dynpro      USING 'SAPMIEQ0' '0100'.
PERFORM bdc_field       USING 'BDC_OKCODE'
                                '/00'.
PERFORM bdc_field       USING 'RM63E-EQUNR'
                                p_equip.
PERFORM bdc_dynpro      USING 'SAPMIEQ0' '0101'.
PERFORM bdc_field       USING 'BDC_OKCODE'
                                '=LVSE'.
PERFORM bdc_dynpro      USING 'SAPMIEQ0' '0101'.
PERFORM bdc_field       USING 'BDC_OKCODE'
                                '=BU'.
* Call transaction for marking equipement as deleted
CALL TRANSACTION 'IE02' USING bdcdata
                          MODE tp_mode
                          UPDATE 'S'
                          MESSAGES INTO messtab.
CLEAR: bdcdata, bdcdata[].

GR after final Delivery marked for Proc. Order

Dear All
I have a process order for which i had made Final Delivery in goods Recipt tab..
IS there a way to do some more GR against that order. As when i m trying to remove the check box of final delivery its not accepting.
thanks
Zeeshan

Dear Krishna
thanks for prompt reply...
can you please tell, i have to do the UD as rejected R... or just some quantity to be sent to rejected.
after doing the above step how can i revoke the order.
thanks
Zeeshan

How to Set the APPR status in Background for service orders

Hi Friends,
could anybody please ,let me know how to set the APPR satus for the seleted service orders( IW32) in background?
Regards,
Xavier.P.

Hi,
Thanks for the reply and you are correct, I am using BADI and I am calling this BAPI inside the method.
Now I am trying to execute this BAPI from SE38 and I am getting the error message, "Error in processing ,Function was not executed". I am able to see this message in the return parameter of the BAPI (Error type - 'E'). And it is giving dump after the call to BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT.
I am using conversion routine 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ABPSN_INPUT' before passing the WBS element to the BAPI.
Please help in this regard.
Regards,
V Kumar
Edited by: V Kumar on Jun 26, 2009 1:42 PM

Delivery costs in stock transport order

Dear SAP experts,
We want to add certain delivery cost in the stock transport order.
We create a new pricing schema with 3 delivery cost conditions "Z" conditions. The new pricing schema is assigned to the stock transport order doc type.
In transaction code me27, when the try tp enter the delivery cost conditions by clicking on the conditions icon, system given an error message saying that "Function not possible for this item". Message No. 06096.
Pricing is as follows -
STKP - Stock transfer price
Z001    10% on STKP
Z002     2% on STKP
Z003     1% on STKP
Kindly help.
Thanks & Regards,

Hi,
Check the following things
1. Make sure manual entry is allowed for Delivery Costs Condition
2. Make sure PO is not yet processed or no subsequent documents exists for the PO so that you can manually edit the PO using ME22N.
Thanks & Regards,

Change the valuation class of material [Stock transport order scenario]

Dears,
Client would like to change the valuation class of material.
There is no open Purchase order/Process order/Purchase requistion and stock in plant.
Scenario- One Stock transport order is created.
For same goods issue (351-issuing plant) and goods receipt (101-receiving plant) is done.
When we are going to change the valuation class of said material, message is "purchase order is open
and it shows the no of STO [for which receipt and issue is done]"
To resolve this issue we had first delete the STO line item no(ME22N). Then change the valuation class.
(this allows). and then undelete the STO line item. Through this we can change the valuation class of material.
Please advise in such business process that this is right way or there may be other option.
Thanks & Regards
Rajan

rajanshah219,
Here's my take on how to fix:
*Manually change Config TCode OMT4 - change message MM 326 & 327 to type "W" (if open order exists...now you can enter through warning messages)
*If inventory exists, then issue out of stock to a cost center
*Change valuation class
*Put stock back into inventory (reverse to that same cost center) Note issue out and reverse back into inventory must happen in the same posting period.
**Valuation class should be changed as expected
**Manually change config TCode OMT4 - change message MM 326 & 327 back to type "E"
Thanks,
Jason

Why "System.setIn()" can set the final parameter "System.in"?

When i worte a class to test the System class,I have read the System class source.
I found that the parameter System.in is defined as a final parameter.
But strangely, why the System.setIn() can change the System.in?
This is the fragment of the source
public static void setIn(InputStream in) {
setIn0(in);
private static native void setIn0(InputStream in);the setIn() method calls a private method called setIn0(), but the setIn0() does noting. I found a "native" definition? I think this is the key reason
Pleas tell me what the "native" means and the how the setIn() & setIn0() method work?

You really can't set final variables after they've been set in Java code, but Sun gets away with it by using native (that is non-java) code. It's a (necessary?) evil and should not be taken as a guide to good code. Just imagine a big "Big Bad Voodoo" sign above the native method.

EKPO-EGLKZ - Setting the "Final Delivery Flag" on a transport order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for