Elements 9 ACR 6.5 is a cut down program

I've used ACR with CS4 before to process my RAW files but recently bought Lightroom 3.5 and Elements 9. I've upgraded both programs to ACR 6.5 to support my camera and noticed for the first time that the Elements plugin is a cut down version of ACR 6.5 with many of its features missing. If ACR 6.5 is a free download and available from thrid party websites why isn't the full program available when opening a RAW file withing Elements 9? I've tried downloading it from Adobe and using it as a standalone probram but when opening it up I'm told that it isn't appropriate.
George

From what I’ve seen, while many adjustment tabs and sliders are not in PSE-hosted ACR, the underlying RAW converter is still the same, so if you have made adjustments in LR and save into an XMP then open in PSE, or just use Edit In Photoshop Elements from LR, the ACR that opens the file on the way in to PSE will apply all the adjustments that were made in LR. And so since you can make all the adjustments in LR there’s no need to make anymore adjustments in the ACR on the way into PSE is there?
Is your experience different than this, where if you do something in LR that doesn’t have a corresponding slider in the PSE-hosted ACR, it doesn’t get applied. For example, if you make a manual lens-correction for perspective that is easy to tell whether it happened or not, in LR and then do a Edit in Photoshop Elements from LR, does the perspective-correction not happen?
The only thing that should be different is that you have to be in LR to make all the adjustments, not use PSE-hosted ACR to make them.

Similar Messages

SMARTFORM ERROR - Part of Text is cutting down after SPACE

Hi,
I have made a simple smartform just for test purpose.
I included a simple template in the main window which has 5 mm height and 3 cm width.
In the template there is one text element, and 1 included a constant text:
LABEL: YYYYYYYY
If i see the print preview, it displaying correctly.
BUT!
If I change the constant text to longer, to test what happens if the field is longer than the available size to display:
LABEL: YYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
In the print preview this will be shown:
LABEL:
So it means that those Y's are just cutting down.
If I replace the longer version of the text to:
LABEL:_YYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
In the print preview I can see as many characters as it can display, so some Y's are not printing:
LABEL:_YYYYYYYY
Can somebody tell me if I use spaces, how to avoid to cut the remaining text and display as many characters as it can like with underscore character?
This is a very strange and buggy behaviour.
BR,
Gabor from Hungary

Hi
I suppose I depends on the logic used in order to print a text in an area smoller than text
It seems it always tries to write fully the words, that means if the text has many words, the smartform writes the first words (on the left) fully and truncates the remaining words, if the text has one word only, smartform write the part of it can be contained.
So if you insert
A) LABEL: YYYYYYYY
There are 2 words:
LABEL:
YYYYYYYY
Both words can be contained so smartform writes both of them
B) LABEL: YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
There are 2 words:
LABEL:
YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
The second word should be trucated, so the smartform writes the first only
C) LABEL:YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
There is only one word, so smartform writes only the character can be contained in the window
Max
Edited by: max bianchi on Nov 10, 2010 6:21 PM
Edited by: max bianchi on Nov 10, 2010 6:26 PM

Ability of DSLR cameras to cut down UV and infrared light

Is it a fact that most digital cameras can cut down ultraviolet and infrared parts of the electromagnetic radiation on their own and therefore do not require separate filters for that purpose? If so, even an entry level DSLR, like my Canon EOS 1100D, is so capable?

Yes, this is true. In fact... more than you might guess.
In the days of film (I speak as if it's ancient history but that's how many of us here grew up shooting) the sensitivity of the film to various parts of the spectrum dependended entirely on the film itself. If you wanted to shoot infra-red, you loaded the camera with infra-red film. Non infra-red film was not particularly sesntivie to infra-red light.
Many films were mildly sensitive to UV light and the real point of the UV filter (which I think might surprise most people) is that whenever you pass light through a "lens", the lens has a "dispersion" effect which bends different wavelengths of light by a different amount. Compensating elements are used in the lens to attempt to correct for this and better lenses are judged substantially by how well they handle this. But it turns out human eyes are not sensitive to either UV (nor IR). Since UV is on the short end of the spectrum, it's light bends more than any other wavelength and would thus need the most correction. If left uncorrected, this might cause an image to appear slightly "soft" because the UV wavelength does not want to focus at precisely the same focus distance. Rather than "correct" the UV wavelength, it's much easier to just eliminate it entirely by using a filter -- problem solved.
Back to the era of digital...
Digital cameras are senstiive to both UV and IR and much moreso than film. Effectively _every_ digital camera needs to filter these wavelengths out. But more than this... human eyes are not actually 'equally" sensitive to all colors of light. We are far more sensitive to the wavelengths in the middle of the visible spectrum and not nearly as sensitive to the wavelengths nearing the sides of the visible spectrum. You are, in effect, VASTLY more sensitive to "greens" and much less sensitive to either red or blue. So while you see the world with reds, greens, and blues... the real world has significantly more red and blue than you are able to see. Cameras would see these more or less equally and this would result in images which appear to be saturated with red and blue.
To fix this, the camera does a few things...
First... the sensor is coated with "photosites" under a mask of red, green, and blue micro "filters". The array is usually referred to as a "Bayer Mask" (there are other types but this is the most common.) The mask has twice as many "green" sensitive sites as it does red or blue sites.
Second... the camera has both UV and IR filters inside and these are located immediately in front of the sensor (but behind the shutter). If you remove the lens, open the shutter, and look in side, then what you actually are looking at is a couple of layers of filters (which appear mostly clear to you) and then the sensor itself is behind them all.
Third... the UV and IR filters have a gradual cut-off curve. The IR wavelength begins at 700nm (and longer) Anything "shorter" than 700 is considered 'visible' light. The visible spectrum runs from roughly 400nm through 700nm. But it's not as if the filter allows 0% of wavelengths shorter than 400nm to pass and 0% of the wavelengths longer than 700nm to pass and yet 100% of the stuff between 400 and 700nm through. What it _really_ does is a gradual ramp.
The filter begins cutting IR light starting while it's still in the 500nm range -- it's already being filtered in the 600nm range. By the time we get to the 656nm wavelength (which happens to be a fire-engine red color -- that's the "Hydrogen alpha emission line" the filter is already cutting nearly 75% of the "red" light (and this is still considered "visible" light spectrum territory). By the time it gets to the 700nm wavelength it's cutting nearly all of it.
This may sound surprising or undesireable but actually... it more mirrors the sensitive amounts of your own eyes. Your eyes are less sensitive to those wavelengths so the camera is deliberately de-tuned to be less sensitive to those areas as well and in doing this, you end up with a photograph which more closely approximatelys the color proportions that your eyes are used to seeing.
There are people who modify their cameras so they can be used for IR photography and astrophotographers love to modify them for astrophotography purposes (the Canon 60Da is a special edition of the 60D which is pre-modified by Canon to be more sensitive to the wavelengths needed in astrophotography which benefits greatly if sensitive to the Ha (Hydrogen alpha) wavelength (656.28nm) is improved.)
Thats probably more than you wanted to know about the filters... but there you have it!
There is no "need" to use a UV (nor IR) filter on any of your lenses. Some people use them as a form of "protection" (to avoid getting dirt directly on the front element of the lens). There is a downside to useing them in that they often will create optical reflections in your image ... with "ghosting" or "flaring" that would not be visible had no filter been on the lens.
Regards,
Tim
Tim Campbell
5D II, 5D III, 60Da

I need to edit out parts of a song to cut it down to two minutes for my daughter's talent show. I went to info and it will cut down one part but only one part. I need to put three parts together. I tried adding duplicates of the song to the list but if I

I need to edit out parts of a song to cut it down to two minutes for my daughter's talent show. I went to info/start time and it will cut down one part but only one part. I need to put three parts together. I tried adding duplicates of the song to the list but if If I change the start time on one it will change it on all of them.

In your library, right-click the song you want to edit.
select "get info".
go to "options" and select the start and stop times for your first section of the song.
click "OK".
Find the shortened version of the song in your library. It may take a minute for it to show up. right click it again and select "create (????) version". (the ???? is different for different formats).
The library will spit out a new, second version of the song which you can rename. I suggest you use the original title and add a 1 to the end.
Now you can go back to the other version and repeat the process with a different start/stop time.
Once you are done editing, you can burn all of your versions to a disk, just make sure your interval time is zero so there are no gaps between edits.
To keep the orginal song on your library, just go back to the original and put the start/stop times back to the original settings.

Cut down Table data

Hi
I got one requirement to cut down one Table having 4 years worth of data. Requirement want to export only 6 month of data of same table to another database.
The problem with this table is that.. This table is not having any "date" column_name or Data_type.
Table structure is as ..
"CLICK_ID" NUMBER,
"MEMBER_ID" NUMBER,
"LINK_ID" NUMBER,
"CLICK_TIMESTAMP" NUMBER,
"REMOTE_HOST" VARCHAR2(255 CHAR),
"USER_AGENT" VARCHAR2(255 CHAR),
"FAMILY" NUMBER,
"AGENT" NUMBER,
"TYPE" NUMBER,
"COMBINED" NUMBER,
"BUILDMODE" NUMBER,
Please guide me how can I cutdown this table to only 6 months of data.
I am on Oracle 10g.
Let me know if you need more information.
Thanks

PK wrote:
Hi
I got one requirement to cut down one Table having 4 years worth of data. Requirement want to export only 6 month of data of same table to another database.
The problem with this table is that.. This table is not having any "date" column_name or Data_type.
Table structure is as ..
"CLICK_ID" NUMBER,
"MEMBER_ID" NUMBER,
"LINK_ID" NUMBER,
"CLICK_TIMESTAMP" NUMBER,
"REMOTE_HOST" VARCHAR2(255 CHAR),
"USER_AGENT" VARCHAR2(255 CHAR),
"FAMILY" NUMBER,
"AGENT" NUMBER,
"TYPE" NUMBER,
"COMBINED" NUMBER,
"BUILDMODE" NUMBER,
Please guide me how can I cutdown this table to only 6 months of data.
I am on Oracle 10g.
Let me know if you need more information.
ThanksObviously you are going to have to decide how to identify the age of a row. WE certainly don't know your application. I do see a column CLICK_TIMESTAMP that could be promising. What is it?

Adobe photoshop elements 8 causes the computer to shut down when I click; won't reinstall. Ideas?

Adobe photoshop elements 8 causes the computer to shut down when I click on it. I can't reinstall the program. Suggestions for troubleshooting? All other programs work fine.

Hi, thanks for your reply. I had installed PSE8 about 2 years ago and it had worked well until today. When ir crashed the computer, I tried uninstalling PSE8 and then reinstalling the program. No luck. T he operating system is Windows 7 Home Premium.
Vance

Oracle 9i cut down version

Hi ,
We have an embedded license for the Oracle 9i DB Enterprise edition and we r planning to package it along with our application for the clients. But all we need from Oracle 9i DB is just the database and nothing else.
Due to the huge size of the Oracle DB around 1.5 gb we were thinking that if we cud a cut down version of the Oracle 9iDb it wud be easier to package along with our application.
Is this possible ?? if so How??
Thanx
Kulkarni

oop! should of course have been 1.4.2.03 !

Java needs a cut down "media" VM

What would it take for java to take on flash in the internet media space?
My thoughts on why flash dominates java:
The java download is far too big, java is ~7MB, flash is ~1.8MB
The vm takes far too long to startup
You get an ugly grey box when the vm is starting up in place of the applet
What is needed is a cut down java "media" vm. It should:
Be no larger than the flash download of ~1.8MB
Have greatly improved startup time. On a modern pc it should be almost instantaneous.
Be fully upgradable to the "full" vm. For example if the full vm is ~7MB then if you have the media vm installed the full vm download should be ~1.8MB smaller
As the name implies it should be focused solely on rich media (steaming movies etc)
It should not cause the java icon to popup on the taskbar by default. It should be transparent to the user that java is running.
Should not display a grey box in place of the applet when starting up, the box should be black or non-existent.
The aim would be for sites like youtube to be able to realistically replace flash with java. What do you think?

>
Not true, you should probably read a few tutorials. You can already replace that with an image or an animated image.Well I have not written any applets for a long time it is just what I am seeing out there. I have been developing java for over 10 years so I don't need to read any tutorials.
This is a large development space and java should be taking it over. JVM modularity is the first step in the same direction.

When I try to open Elements Organizer Windows says it has shut down

When I try to open Elements Organizer, Windows says it has shut down and is searching for a problem. How do I resolve this situation?

I have Vista and Elements 10. The help desk had me transfer my catalog
file to the desktop and it worked.
From:   Jeff A Wright <[email protected]>
To:     matto5150 <[email protected]>
Date:   01/15/2012 12:36 PM
Subject:        When I try to open
Elements Organizer Windows says it has shut down
Re: When I try to open Elements Organizer Windows says it has shut down
created by Jeff A Wright in Downloading, Installing, Setting Up - View the
full discussion
Did it ever work? Which version of Windows are you using? Which version
of Elements do you have?
Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not
directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either
reply to this email or visit the message page: [
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4142122#4142122]
To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at [
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4142122#4142122]. In the Actions box on
the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
Start a new discussion in Downloading, Installing, Setting Up by email or
at Adobe Forums
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications
please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

Strange behavior - compositions being cut down

I'm trying to create After Effects compositions to be used in my Premiere Pro projects, but strange behavior is making this completely impossible. Here's how it goes:
1. Start a new AE project, start a new composition.
2. Add clips/effects/etc., save.
3. Start a NEW AE project, start a NEW composition.
4. Add clips/effects/etc., save.
5. Composition 1 has now been cut down to the time composition 2 and when trying to open composition 1 in AE, it redirects me to composition 2.
I don't get what's going on... it's like they're being linked, but they're two entirely different projects/compositions. This is crazy and it's wasting a lot of my time. Any help would be appreciated.

Let me slap my self on the forehead and say "D'oh" It's your workflow. You're using dynamic link in Premiere Pro. The proper workflow is to have all of the comps in the same AE project. In Premiere Pro you go to File>Dynamic Link>New After Effects Project. You create your comp size in Premiere Pro, not in AE, then AE opens up and you create your comp. When you want to create a new dynamic link you follow the same procedure.
Dynamic link can only look at one instance of AE at a time so it's looking at the last project for the comp info. It can't find comp 1 in project 1 because it's only looking at project 3. That explains the same comp showing up in all three locations. Fix the workflow and you'll fix the problem. In fact, I think that if you open up project 3 and import project 1 and project 2, then same project 3, then open up Premiere Pro your problem will be fixed.

How Can I Move the Elements by Tap on Touchscreen or Mouse Down Event in Adobe Edge Animate?

hi , how can i move the elements by tap on tochscreen or mouse down event in adobe edge animate? like action for moving car.

in my idea is mousedown action or tap on touchscreen plays the role of car accelerator, (gas pedal) when i left click on mouse my car moves forward and the car doesnt move when I dont click or tap.
Do you have a solution?

I have iphone 5 ,i cut down bsnl 64k sim into nano and inserted it. everything is working except cellular data or 3g data, please help me

i have iphone 5 ,i cut down bsnl 64k sim into nano and inserted it. everything is working calling & messaging except cellular data or 3g data, please help me

Everything you need to know about the solution is written into the question you posed. Get a proper SIM.

Best Export Format for iDVD to cut down on multiplexing and processing

My processor is what it is and my Ram has been optimized. Is there some video/audio format/ bit rate that will require less time to convert and process?
I understand that MPEG2, mpeg4, H.264, avi, and all seem to take far too long. I prefer using FCPX and Wondershare to do my converting.
Also whenever I have a random burning error its almost always a “multiplexing error” so maybe if I make the “multiplexing” a little easier maybe I can prevent that headache.
Any thoughts about inve$ting in the fastest burners available? Isn’t the actual “burn” process the very last step that usually only takes about 2 minutes anyway?
Thank you in advance!

KidVid wrote:
My processor is what it is and my Ram has been optimized. Is there some video/audio format/ bit rate that will require less time to convert and process?
All depends on what format you need for what purpose. If you need a DVD it'll have to be MPEG-2 or for web use it'll have to be h.264. Other than that there are tons of codecs and containers available. All conversion takes time and to cut down on that time you will need a faster machine.
KidVid wrote:
Also whenever I have a random burning error its almost always a “multiplexing error” so maybe if I make the “multiplexing” a little easier maybe I can prevent that headache.
To avoid burn errors in iDVD create a disk image of your project, test that image file with DVD Player, and, if satisfied, burn with any dedicated disc burning app at no more than 4x to avoid errors.
KidVid wrote:
Any thoughts about inve$ting in the fastest burners available? Isn’t the actual “burn” process the very last step that usually only takes about 2 minutes anyway?
See the speed limit above.

Cut down Micro Sim in iPhone 6

Hi everyone,
Has anybody successfully used a cut down micro sim in the iPhone 6?
Thanks

DON'T try it. The micro sim might be a little bit thicker than the nano sim. So there is a possibility that the sim and sim trap get stuck and you won't get it out.

HT201269 Can a sim card from an iphone 3 be cut down to fit in an I phone 4s?

Can a sim card from an iphone 3 be cut down to fit in an I phone 4s?

Yes.
See: http://www.amazon.co.uk/DIGIFLEX-Micro-Cutter-Adaptors-iPhone/dp/B003V4518I
Although it is better to just request a new MicroSIM from your network provider.

Elements 9 ACR 6.5 is a cut down program

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for