EMBARGO Check on a US Company

I need help on two issues please
1. On GTS 7.2 I am getting Embargo checks for only one of the US companies we use...the other US companies are not being blocked.
2. On GTS 7.2 when releasing Embargo for a country on a sales order, the delivery order, when created gets another Embargo block

Hi Kim,
Sorry for the delay.....
For Company Code Assignments,
SPRO>GTS>General Settings>Org.structure>***.of Org.Units from Feeder System to FTO-->Assign Company Code at Feeder System Group Level
For Doc.type,
SPRO>GTS>SAP Compliance-->Doc.Structure
Let me know as which part of world are you working or mail id,so that it will be helpful for more quick responses...
Thanks,
SS

Similar Messages

Problem with embargo check for orders with textposition

Hi all!
Our orders get embargo checked by GTS. Some of the orders do have textpositions (Typ AGTX), that causes errors, because they don't have a material number or plant.
Where can I customize, that these textpositions should not be embargo checked?
Thank you for your help.
kind regards
Sabine

Hello Sabine,
you would have to modify BADis for MM0A and SD0A document transfers saying when transferring document with items having AGTX filled not to be relevant for GTS.
Materials Management u2192 Purchasing u2192 Basic Functions u2192 Foreign
Trade/Customs u2192 SAP GRC Global Trade Services- Plug-In u2192
Business Add-Ins for SAP GRC Global Trade Services u2192 Change and
Expand Document Data for Transfer
Sales and Distribution u2192 Foreign Trade/Customs u2192 SAP GRC Global
Trade Services- Plug-In u2192 Business Add-Ins for SAP GRC Global Trade
Services u2192 Change and Expand Document Data for Transfer
Hope it helps,
Best regards,
Gabriel.

PO Number Check on an Inter-Company Consignment Fill-up Order

Hi Gurus,
I am working on an Inter-Company Consignment Fillup Scenario. When i create an order in CRM the order is error free. Upon replication i get an error. The error message is
Purchase order "TEST PO" does not exist in the system (see long text) (Notification E V1 583) - TEST PO is the PO entered.
The requirement is to enter any PO and ECC should not check if a Purchase Order exists for the PO entered in ECC.
This was working before we applied support packs in our environment 10 days back.
Well we do not create orders in ECC, if i try to create one in ECC the error is
Purchase order Test PO does not exist in the system
Message no. V1583
Diagnosis
You are creating an order for a consolidated company and must eliminate internal business volume. For this reason, the system tries to determine if the related purchase order exists. This is not the case, however.
Procedure
Enter the relevant purchase order number
Thanks,
Kiran AV

<b>Consignment Cycle:</b>
1. Consignment fill up:
Sales document type is KB
Item category KBN
schedule line category 1
In this step, you are not invoicing the customer. document flow is sales order -
delivery item category. It will not be relevant for billing and pricing because you are not charging money for these goods in this step.
In schedule line category, you will set movement type 631 & set for availability check and TOR.
2. Consignment Issue.
Once the customer informed you that he used all the goods or partial goods then you will create consignment issue for used goods.
Sales document: KE
Item category: KEN
schedule line category: C0 or C1
Here you are invoicing the customer(because he used the goods). you are assigning the delivery document and billing document to the sales document.
In item category, you are setting relevant for billing, pricing, special stock.
In schedule line category, your setting is 633 movement type, relevant for availability check & TOR.
3. Consignment Return:
Customer found that some goods are damaged or he not able to sold the goods he want to send it back. that you are creating this document.
Sales document type: KR
Item category: KRN
You will assign delivery document and billing to sales document. you will create return order, return delivery, return billing.
Your setting item category relevant for billing, returns, pricing, special stock.
Your setting schedule line item category: 634 movement type, NO availability NO TOR.
4. Consignment Pick up:
Even if you create the consignment return the goods are not come to direct to your plant. For that you need to create consignment pick up. here the owner ship is not changing so you do not need to create billing.
Assign return delivery to sales document type.
Sales document: KA
Item category: KAN
Regards,
Rajesh Banka

User-exit for availbility check in SD - cross company

Hi all,
I have a issue regarding that we want to check the stock availibility at 2 different plants (belonging to 2 different company codes) as they were 1 plant. Meaning we want to do availability check across 2 plants. And when creating the delivery, the system should consider all batches from the 2 plants.
Since this is not SAP standard we either need APO (this can do it) OR some user-exit tricks - have any of you ever done this?
Please help me asap .....
Best regards
Lars

Can u brief the query in detail without missing anything right from deliver creation .
Material avaliablity stock is for a plant and storage location . and plant is defined under company code .
We can check the stock avaliable for the plant and material in table <b>MARD for the field LABST</b> for the requirement .
plant company code can be evaluated .
a material can be present in two different plants .
u can check table MARC and MARD for the same .
check the user exits for the same .
EXIT_SAPLV50R_001
EXIT_SAPLV50R_VIEW_001
EXIT_SAPLV50R_VIEW_002
Are u creating a Outbound/inbound delivery ?
Brief the navigation so that it wil be easy for us .
regards,
vijay

Authority-check for a particular company code

Hi,
   I need to check authorization for a particular company code.In my bdc call transaction program i'm fetching mass data from excel file and for every record i've to check the company code field.If the company code is not the required one then that record should not be processed.
So before filling the bdc data i wrote like
LOOP AT gt_inrec INTO gs_inrec.
     AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'F_BKPF_BUK'
               ID 'ACTVT' field '02'
               ID 'BUKRS' field '2800'.
    IF NOT sy-subrc = 0.
      MESSAGE e058(zz) WITH gs_inrec-bukrs.
      EXIT.
    ENDIF.
     PERFORM fill_bdc.
ENDLOOP.
but it is not exiting for different company codes and is allowing records with all company codes.
can anybody pls tell me how to rectify this?
thanks in advance,
poornima

I need to perform authority check on the field NAME1 present in the standard screen - customer master ( T.Code-XD02). Only certain users should be allowed to edit the field and others should be restricted.
I have created a field exit FIELD_EXIT_AD_NAME1 for the ADRC-NAME1 field.
Now inside this field exit i need to write the authority-check code.
I have created the authorisation object Z_KNA1_NAM for the field NAME1 using the SU20 and SU21.
For this scenario how do i write the authority-check code in my field exit?
Below is my field exit code,is that correct?
FUNCTION FIELD_EXIT_AD_NAME1.
""Local Interface:
*" IMPORTING
*" REFERENCE(INPUT)
*" EXPORTING
*" REFERENCE(OUTPUT)
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'Z_KNA1_NAM'
ID 'NAME1' FIELD SY-UNAME
ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '03'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
MESSAGE 'Not Allowed to Edit the Name 1 Field' TYPE 'E'.
ENDIF.
ENDFUNCTION.
In the above code i have given SY-UNAME in the code line 2 - ID 'NAME1' FIELD SY-UNAME ,is that correct? what should i give there?
Please help me on this issue.
Cheers,
P.S.Chitra

Difference between SPL and Embargo check

Hi,
What is the difference between Embargo and SPL screening.
Regards
Gaurav Jain

Hi Gaurav,
Embargo
An embargo is a government prohibition against the shipment of particular products to a particular country for economic or political reasons.
SAP Global Trade Services (SAP GTS) provides an embargo service that helps you manage import and export processes in global trade. The embargo service automatically checks whether there are any "critical" business partners contained in your customs document, that is, whether the business partners are in an embargo situation. If there is an embargo situation, the document is blocked for further processing. Essentially, the embargo service enables you to map all possible combinations of legal regulations using three functions in combination with one another
Sanctioned Party List Screening
A sanctioned party list contains a list of persons and companies with whom trade is prohibited by law. These boycott lists are issued by government agencies and can be obtained from data providers. All traders must comply with these lists.
Sanctioned party list screening lets you compare the addresses of your business partners (such as the consignee) with the sanctioned party lists automatically prior to goods export. It is a system-independent solution that performs and logs the SPL check and is fully integrated into the complete business process.
Hope this information helps
Regards,
Prarit
Edited by: Prarit Sehgal on Apr 2, 2009 2:05 AM

Check posted on wrong company code, please help!

Hello experts,
Hand check xxx4 was posted under 451 Co code when it should have been posted under 445 Co code. What are the steps to take to correct this? This check has already been cashed and needs to be cleared against the account.

Hi,
1. If cheque has been cashed, probably it will not work to reverse or void the cheque.
Only if u hav same no. Range in correct company code. u can mannualy assign the ckh no to pmt doc. Use fch5. and reverse & void the chk pmt in previous co code.
2. You can post inter co code posting.. Jv for the transaction.
3. Either riase the debit or credit note for the same and close it
plz mark helpful if it is ..
Rgds
Gopal Rawat

FD32 checks authorisation for all company codes.

A User is authorised for his own company code (B) and credit control area (B). Customer master is common for a and b companies. When trying to maintain FD32 for common customer for company B, system is checking authorisation for A and returning an error message No authorization for analyzing accounts in company code A. For information we are on EC6.

It would be just a warning message.
Have you tried with a Customer who is only created in Company B? Probably in this case system will not display any messages.
As your Customer is common for both Company Codes, system gives a message.
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Two check forms for same company code

Hi
We are using two different house banks with in same company code. And we will issue checks from both banks depending on need. However check formats of both banks are different.
Question is how to set up different check formats as we can enter only one check form in FBZP by company code.
Any help in this regard really appreciated.
thanks

closed myself

AP - One Check for Vendor from two Company Codes

Our Company would like to issue one check for a vendor in two company codes.
Configuration has the paying company code = sending company code.
So the payment proposal will want to create two checks, one for each company code.
Question --- Is there a way to generate one check for the one vendor in two company codes.
Thank you,
Jeffrey

Dear Jeffrey,
Let say there are two company codes 100 and 200, in the config, you will need to make paying company code for company code 100 = 100 and
Paying company code for company code 200 = 100.
you will need to set the Intercompany balancing account in Tcode OBYA.
Once you do this, the other process remains the same. Should you have questions, let me know.
Thanks
Raghuram

Availability check for intra company delivery

HI experts ,
we have set up the system to carry out the Availability check during the cross company delivery ,the same configuration had been maintained for the intra company delivery ,but the test result shows that the ATP check had only take consideration of the cross company delivery ,whereas it didn't cover the intra company delivery .So is there any clue for this .
BTW ,the check gruop is 02 ,checking rule is 01for the assignment.

Hi,
Check the which check rule system proposes for your transactions- sales order and delivery
How to check?
Vl02n-- Menu--> Environment-Avaialbility
It may not Checking rule 01, may be 'B"
you need to check the Co09 with this option only
By the above option it self you can check
MD04 will give -reservation for delivery ans sales orders- you can check here also
Thanks
Chidambaram

Which table Embargo legal regulation on customs document can be found?

Hi,Expert:
Do you know in which table the embargo legal regulation on customs document item can be found? In table:/SAPSLL/LEGCON, there is no embargo legal regulation information.
Thanks

In our company, we have defined two embargo legal regualations,for instance,EMB01 and EMB02 which are determined according to the departuring country of sales item.
But I can not find a table in GTS which has the information regarding which embargo legal regulation is used on the sales item.In table:/SAPSLL/LEGCON, you can find the legal control related legal reguation but not embargo legal regulation.
I am not wondering if the embargo checking result are not stored in table at all but generated as a view when you check it.

GTS activated @FI for SPL and Embargo- need resrtictions

Hi All,
We have activated SAP GTS for FI in R/3 system for SPL screening and Embargo check purposes, but there is no restriction for specific company codes.
Right now we are using GTS for Europe alone, so we need FI activation only for Europe company codes. But it is impacting all other company codes, the impact is getting error message while processing payment transctions due to GTS activation.
How do we restrict specific company codes for SPL screening and Embargo check in FI module, is there some config or we need any some user exists.
Please provide your valuable inputs which will help us.
Regards,
Lakshmikanth

Hi Hari,
Thanka for your reply. It is applicable for both master data and transactional data transfer. Already we have master data transfer filter user exit in place. Now we need to develop similar for transactional data.
I have one more question, is SPL and Embargo screening happens for all FI transactions or for few transactions like F110, F111 and FBZ4, please confirm the same?
I think we need to follow same method for Logistics also.
Regards,
Lakshmikanth

Question on Third Party Payroll Check in XML Publisher

Hi:
I have created an XML Third Party Check report that is based on the queries found in the seeded Oracle PAYUSGAR.rdf 115.24 check report. The patch 9211869 fixed an issue in the standard report where multiple checks for the same employee to the same payee for the same amount were NOT printing the correct garnishment reference number. I have reviewed the report code but have not been able to fix this same issue through XML.
My queries will produce all of the correct data except the 2nd duplicate (same employee to the same payee for the same amount) prints the reference number from the 1st element rather than the 2nd. Does anyone know how the check data is tied to the elements through the tables?
My example is:
Person: Max Doe Check: 1234 Paid to: California Agency Check Amount: 121.00 Pre_payment_id: 766297 Ref # 4567
Person: Max Doe Check: 1234 Paid to: California Agency Check Amount: 121.00 Pre_payment_id: 766302 Ref # 657AA
(Ref # 657AA prints on the second check as Ref # 4567)
The query from the report is:
SELECT peev.screen_entry_value garn_ref_no
,:check_amount
,TO_CHAR(pay_us_payment_pkg.get_trx_date(
:business_group_id,
:ppa_payroll_action_id,
NULL,
:ppa_payroll_id,
:ppa_consolidation_set_id,
:ppa_org_payment_method_id,
:ppa_effective_date,
:ppa_date_earned,
:ppa_override_date,
ppp.pre_payment_id,
ppa.effective_date
),'DD-MON-YYYY') payment_date
,TO_CHAR(ppa.date_earned, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
,prr_att.run_result_id
,peef.entry_information2 -- FIPS code
,peef.entry_information3 -- Medical Indicator
,paa.assignment_action_id
,pet.element_type_id
FROM pay_element_entry_values_f peev,
pay_input_values_f piv_att,
pay_element_entries_f peef,
pay_run_results prr_att,
pay_run_results prr_pay,
pay_payroll_actions ppa,
pay_assignment_actions paa,
pay_action_interlocks pai,
pay_pre_payments ppp,
pay_input_values_f piv_pay,
pay_run_result_values prrv_att,
pay_run_result_values prrv_pay,
pay_element_types_f pet,
pay_element_types_f pet_calc,
pay_element_classifications pec
WHERE ROUND(ppp.VALUE ,2) = :check_amount
AND ppp.pre_payment_id = :pre_payment_id
AND ppp.assignment_action_id = pai.locking_action_id
AND pai.locked_action_id = paa.assignment_action_id
AND ppa.payroll_action_id = paa.payroll_action_id
AND ppa.action_type IN ('R', 'Q')
AND ((paa.source_action_id IS NOT NULL AND ppa.run_type_id IS NOT NULL) OR
(paa.source_action_id IS NULL AND ppa.run_type_id IS NULL))
AND ppp.personal_payment_method_id = peef.personal_payment_method_id
AND peef.assignment_id = paa.assignment_id
AND ppa.date_earned BETWEEN peev.effective_start_date
AND peev.effective_end_date
AND ppa.date_earned BETWEEN peef.effective_start_date
AND peef.effective_end_date
AND piv_att.input_value_id = peev.input_value_id
AND UPPER(piv_att.NAME) = 'ATTACHMENT NUMBER'
AND ppa.effective_Date BETWEEN piv_att.effective_start_date
AND piv_att.effective_end_date
AND piv_att.input_value_id = prrv_att.input_value_id
AND prrv_att.result_value = peev.screen_entry_value
AND prrv_att.run_result_id = prr_att.run_result_id
AND paa.assignment_Action_id = prr_att.assignment_Action_id
AND prr_att.element_type_id = peef.element_type_id
AND peef.element_type_id = pet.element_type_id
AND pet.classification_id = pec.classification_id
AND pec.classification_name = 'Involuntary Deductions'
AND pec.legislation_code = 'US'
AND pec.business_group_id IS NULL
AND fnd_number.canonical_to_number(pet.element_information5) = pet_calc.element_type_id
AND pet_calc.element_name LIKE pet.element_name || '%Calculator'
AND pet_calc.element_type_id = piv_pay.element_type_id
AND NVL(ppa.date_earned, ppa.effective_date) BETWEEN piv_pay.effective_start_date AND piv_pay.effective_end_date
AND piv_pay.input_value_id = prrv_pay.input_value_id
AND UPPER(piv_pay.NAME) = 'PAY VALUE'
AND fnd_number.number_to_canonical(ppp.VALUE) = prrv_pay.result_value
AND prr_pay.run_result_id = prrv_pay.run_result_id
AND prr_pay.assignment_action_id = paa.assignment_action_id
AND prr_pay.element_type_id = pet_calc.element_type_id
ORDER BY prr_att.run_result_id;
Somehow, Oracle has fixed this in the rdf but I have not been able to figure out how exactly. This is a function call in the report but they are passing the check amount and the prepayment_id. Regardless of which pre_payment_id is sent in, 2 rows are returned.
If anyone has any thoughts, please let me know. This is the final tweak that is stopping our go-live with this.
Thanks, RL

In bug 6779249 it states that third party checks are not supported for XML...
But, as we have bought into the push to convert we now are down to payroll checks and third party checks to get our company off of Optio once and for all...
Other than attempting to write a complete custom process from scratch (just to throw out next year when we upgrade to 12) does anyone have any solutions to getting 3rd party checks to print with BIP in Oracle Applications (11.5.10)?
Scott

The tax code entered is not defined in the company code country.

Dear sap guru's
I am facing a problem while doing invoice or while cancelling the invoice or even during Subsequent Credit/Debit
Tax code V0 in procedure is invalid
   Message no. FF704
Diagnosis
   The tax code entered is not defined in the company code country.
System Response
Procedure
   Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
Procedure for System Administration
   If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system
   settings.
   To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
   1. Check whether the required tax procedure has been allocated to the
       company code country. The Procedure field is on the detailed screen.
   2. If you need a new tax code, you can create one yourself.
For this i have checked the assignment of company code and tax code V0 in Tcode (OBCL)
In FTXP the tax code is created in country IN, for the same tax procedure and the tax is a input tax.
please suggest what could be the exact problem
Regards
Sujit

Hi Sujit,
1.Go to FTXP and create tax code V0 for country IN and procedure ZAXINN.
2.In Txn: FV11, For the condition type- XXXX (You will get this in Txn: FTXP, against the tax type, you get the condition type OR in the PO-Item details- Invoice tab, next to field: Tax code, see the Tab-Taxes, click on it and will get the condition type) , maintain the country-IN, Tax code-V0 and the rate.
3.Also things to be checked
1> assign country to company code
2> assign company code to tax code
3> create tax code for country IN
4.Under the following menu path, pls check if you have assigned your tax code to Company Code
IMG>Logistics (General)>Tax on Goods Movement>India>Basic Settings>Determination of Excise Duty>Condition Based Excise Determination>Assign Tax Codes to Company Code
Hope it clears,
Rahul.

EMBARGO Check on a US Company

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for