Employee and "hotspot" ssids

Greetings,
Trying to set up both an Employee and Hotspot ssid connection. The Hotspot is working fine. The Employee is not broadcasting SSID (by design) and will not connect from a manually configured preferred network entry. Also - Dot11Radio0 interface is working - Dot11Radio1 is in reset mode. Can someone please take a look at the attached config and to see where I'm going wrong?

Well, one fix that jumps out at me is:
int d0
no encryption mode ciphers aes-ccm tkip
encryption vlan 2 mode ciphers aes-ccm tkip
IIRC, I believe a radio may go into reset mode if it has no clients on it. Try connecting on A (once you have G working properly) and see if that works.

Similar Messages

Problem with wpa and hidden ssid

hi,
I have a powerbook g4 (1,67ghz). i am having trouble connecting to a netgear router mr814 v3 if i use wpa and hidden ssid, i get a message, that the router would not support wpa!
there is no problem with wep and hidden ssid or wpa with no hidden ssid.
is also have no problems with wpa and hidden ssid with an ibook.
the problems occur only with the powerbook with os x 10.3.9 as well as 10.4.2. even after the recent airport update, no change.
thanks for the help,
ben

I would use WPA and broadcast your SSID.
It use to be useful, but closing your Airport or wireless network (sometimes referred to as not broadcasting your SSID) is really no longer a real option when it comes to wireless security.
Unfortunately "Closed" networks, MAC access control lists, and reduction in transmission power are all more "feel good" security rather than real security. All these various approaches are dated and mistakenly lead to overconfidence.
WPA is your friend if you value wireless security.
My recommendation is not to worry about broadcasting your SSID but use WPA. This will be more secure than a closed WEP encrypted network. Closing your network makes it very difficult for neighbouring networks to see which channels are free thus causing potential interference problems.
Another thing to consider is that a closed network is still broadcasting and therefore is detectable (regardless of whether it is broadcasting a SSID). If someone was determined to hack into your network, then not broadcasting your SSID and MAC address access control is not going to stop them.
WPA is virtually uncrackable (only really vunerable to a dictionary attack if a real word is used as a password) and therefore will stop the casual user and the determined hacker.

Who holds Verizon employees and management accountable and where can I file a complaint.

I feel that writing this letter is a waste of time, but I feel the way customer service reps (not all) as well as their managers (again not all) need to held accountable for lies and disrespectful business practices they place on loyal customers. This is a long and confusing issue, but in as short as possible, I have been a loyal Verizon Wireless customer for several years. This past September 2014, I along with about 200 other loyal customers waited for several hours in anticipation of the IPhone 6 being released outside of a big box Verizon Store located at 7790 Montgomery Rd, Cincinnati, OH 45236, phone number (513) 984-9939. Because of my early arrival, I was number two in line and number two to enter the store once opened. At approximately 7:30 a.m., Verizon Store employees and an unknown woman claiming to be a manager came from the store with flyers in hand and explained the purchase process. She advised customers were able to buy a maximum of three phones, but could only buy one phone at retail price without contract. I informed the manager that I was not eligible for an upgrade at the time, as my wife and I still had about a year of service left on my current contract. At that time I was told “too bad, there are a lot of customers here for the same thing, and if you want the iPhones you will have to add two lines of service.” I had about $2000.00 in my hand willing to pay full price for phones and have them swapped out for my current devices and was told “too bad.” Well after waiting in line for the amount of time I had, I pretty much had no other choice, entered the store, and paid for two new lines of service in order to get two IPhone 6 plus devices with 128 gb of storage.
Immediate upon returning home, I contacted Verizon customer service (phone call one 9/19/14) and requested to terminate both lines, and move the IPhone 6 plus phones to my original lines. Upon explaining the situation to the customer service rep, he was confused as to why I was told I had to open two new lines, but complied. Later in the night, I had realized service was still not activated on the lines after switching the IPhone 6 plus to my original numbers and call customer service again (call two 9/19/14). After explaining the whole situation over again, I was again informed that the store was wrong and should not have made me add two new lines. This customer service rep informed me of the cancellation fees ($350.00 per line x 2), which I told her I was aware, and had planned to pay $950.00 per phone originally so had no problem paying the termination fee. The customer service rep again told me that all had been completed and the lines would be turned off.
On Saturday September 20, 2014, I signed on to my Verizon wireless.com account and saw that I still had two lines (previously told were shut off) still active on my account, with no phones associated with the numbers. Again, upon contacting customer service (call 3 9/20/2014) I had to explain the entire situation all over. At that time I was advised by the customer service rep, that because I was not returning the phones and just wished to pay the termination fees, that I would need to wait until after 14 days of service to call in and cancel the lines, and also have to request a refund on the activation fees (should be waived if canceled within 72 hours of activation) and any service charges associated with having two lines with no physical phones actually being attached to them. At this point I thanked the customer service rep and was informed that all notations to the account were visible in the account to anyone I spoke with.
Friday October 3, 2014, I again contacted Verizon customer service (call 4 10/3/2014) to cancel these lines. Upon explaining the situation again to the customer service rep, I was informed the store I got the phones from (A VERIZON WIRELESS OWNED STORE) had lied to me in that I needed to add lines. At this point, the female representative informed me the activation fees would be waived, along with any other fees, and the lines were cancelled.
Saturday October 4, 2014 I again logged onto my Verizon Wireless.com account and saw that the lines I was told had twice been removed, were still active and alive with no physical devices actually being associated with the lines of service. AGAIN, calling customer service (call 5 10/4/2014) I spoke with a gentleman and expressed my frustrations as to being misinformed several times thus far. At this point, the customer service rep, after keeping me on hold for about 45 minutes, returned to the phone and advised my that the lines were set for cancelation, but not until my next billing cycle, and that I would need to call in again once all service, activation, and whatever else charges were put on my account to have them removed. During the conversation, (without me asking for a single thing at any point during the conversation except just to have the lines turned off and refund the fees) The customer service rep informed me that he was sorry and his manager was sorry for inconvenience that VERIZON had caused me, as a small toke of VERIZON’s appreciation, VERIZON would waive any and all fees associated with the two lines I was forced to add, to include any and all early termination fees. Again, I never once asked for anything, but was offered by VERIZON employees and a VERIZON manager. I was also informed that when I did call back in, the next customer service rep would see all of these offers in my account notations and would comply.
Tuesday October 7, 2014, I was able to view my bill and had observed the added charges associated with account activation, and lines of service. At that point I again called Verizon customer service (Call 6, 10/7/2014) to have these charges removed. Upon calling and AGAIN explaining the two weeks of hell VERIZON had caused me, I was again apologized to, and informed that the last customer service rep had notated everything as I had explained and was informed and exactly quoted by the representative from VERIZON “We are nothing without our integrity at VERIZON, and VERIZON told you we would waive all of these fees (as notated in my account) VERIZON will stand by our word.” At that point, I was told I would need to be placed on hold as the charges and fees were large (about $263.00 in service fees and $700.00 in early termination fees) it would take a while for the customer service rep to work with his manager to have these charges removed (and in the case of the ETFs, not post to the account at my next billing cycle). After one hour of sitting on hold, I was again in contact with the customer service rep and told, he and his manager had put in for every single refund and credit, the VERIZON MANAGER had approved all, but one final approval was needed which may take a day or two. AGAIN all of this is notated in the account as to offers and promises made by VERIZON wireless employees and managers, and again I had NEVER asked for a single penny refunded, but was offered. I AGAIN was completely willing to pay for the phones and the ETFs without problem, but was again and again offered such refunds and credits by VERIZON employees.
Wednesday October 9, 2014, because of the continual misinformation I have been given by VERIZON employees, I contacted VERIZON customer service again (call 7, 10/9/2014) to check on the status of the credits and refunds. At that time, I was informed, that many of the credits had been approved, but both ETF fees were denied and would only be refunded if I returned the devices. As frustrated and confused as I was, I calmly explained every single thing that was offered to me again by VERIZON and was confused as to why a MANAGER for VERIZON would offer such things and then they would be denied. The female customer service rep informed me that she was unfamiliar with the situation, would message the male customer service rep and or manager I spoke with on October 7, 2014 and have them reach out to me to explain. I was also told I would hear from them within a “few hours.” This call was placed at about 9:00 a.m., and by 6:00 p.m. I had still not heard anything back from VERIZON. At that time I again called VERIZON customer service (call 8, 10/9/2014) and spoke with another customer service rep. Again for the 8th time explained the entire VERIZON lying situation, and was told that he (VERIZON representative) saw was I had been offered several times (refunds and credits) in the account notations and “too bad, VERIZON does not offer refunds or waivers of ETFs.” At this point in the conversation, without completely cursing out the representative, I asked to speak with his supervisor and was turned over to another supervisor to speak with. Upon speaking with the supervisor, I was informed (for the first time) that although VERIZON WIRELESS employees / MANAGERs had offered me refunds of ETFs, WHICH WAS DOCUMENTED NUMEROUS TIMES BY VERIZON in my account details, VERIZON simply could not waive these fees. I again informed the manager that I didn’t care about the fees and was willing to pay, but I was tired of being LIED TO. At that point in the conversation, I was again apologized to over and over again and as a token of apology from VERIZON, he a VERIZON MANAGER offered me a $70.00 bill credit in order to help with the ETFs. Again, I never once asked for anything, but was offered time and time again from VERIZON EMPLOYEES and MANAGERS. I thanked him for his offer and the call ended.
October 10, 2014 (AGAIN after repeatedly being lied to contacted VERIZON customer service to check on the status of my credits (call 9, 10/10/2014). At that time, I spoke with a female representative and again explained the entire dilemma caused by VERIZON. Again, I was apologized to countless times and was informed that a bill credit for $70.00 was pending as I was informed on the previous night by a VERIZON WIRELESS MANAGER, but she did not have access to see any further details. After again apologizing countless times, the customer service representative seemed to be frustrated that I had been treated so negatively and informed me she was going to address this with her manager. Upon her return to the line, and again without ever asking for one single thing, the VERIZON representative with her VERIZON MANAGER offered to meet “half way” with regards to the lowest ETF fees associated with my accounts and provide a $235.00 bill credit to help me and as a token of “sorry for VERIZON’s screw up and constant lies.” I was also told I would be contacted by her manager within four hours at approximately or before 2:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. on that same date, after not hearing anything back I again called VERIZON customer service (call 10, 10/10/2014) spoke with another customer service rep and told her the entire story over again. I told the rep I wanted to speak with a manager right at that moment and was placed on the phone with a woman named Linda I believe. Linda informed me that the credit I was previously told I would be given earlier on that date was rejected and I would not be given it. Again without completely going nuts, I calmly explained my complete disgust with VERIZON and the constant lies I was being told. Again after countless apologies from another VERIZON MANAGER, she politely explained to me again the whole VERIZON cannot offer such refunds or credits associated with ETFs and was appalled that anyone in VERIZON would offer such things knowing they could not be given. While working with her, she informed me the best solution to saving money was to cancel my original phone accounts and keep the two new lines that were pending deactivation, which would result in a $250.00 reduced ETF as opposed to a $700.00. I agreed based on her advice without argument and was informed it may take a few hours for the new numbers to be placed back on the IPhones. Two hours later, my phones still not turned on, I contacted VERIZON again. I had also noted that every single bill credit previously applied to my account was back on the account. At this point being as furious as I was, I again called VERIZON WIRELESS (call 11, 10/10/2014) demanded to speak with a MANAGER and was placed on hold. After waiting for an hour on hold (no exaggeration) the customer service representative returned, apologized for everything including the wait time, and placed a male MANAGER on the phone. After explaining the entire three plus week VERIZON lying dilemma, which he was able to see in the account notes where every VERIZON employees acknowledged the misinformation of the previous employee I had spoke with, he again apologized and explained that I did not lose the bill credits, but because two lines had been canceled, the credits were instead applied to my unbilled ETFs, and they would appear on my next bill. He also informed the SIM cards in my devices would still require more time to activate and that they should be turned on by 7:00 a.m. the next day.
While doing research on the SIM issue, I found that VERIZON policy was immediate and SIMs would not require rebooting time to come out of I believe it is called “AG” or “aging” status. Again contacting VERIZON customer service (call 12, 10/10/2014) spoke with a female customer service agent, who actually looking back was the only one not to represent falsehoods or lies, informed me that because the SIM cards were previously associated with cancelled lines, I would need to go to a VERIZON wireless store and get two new SIM cards. At this point in the day it was about 10:00 p.m. and all VERIZON stores were closed for the day. With no choice in the matter, I agreed, and asked just out of curiosity, on the status of the$70.00 bill credit, I was promised on October 9, 2014. At that point the rep informed me that she was able to see that the VERIZON MANAGER had notated and put a credit request in while I was speaking with him, but then immediately cancelled his own request and closed the situation immediately following the completion of our call. I believe at this point in the entire situation I was so fed up this did not surprise me whatsoever so who could I complain to. The very nice customer service representative again apologized for the continued lies I was told and offered me (not a bill credit), but a data GB credit for 12 months (again without me asking for anything). In her own words “I do not want to promise you the world and then lie to you and get your hopes up thinking it will happen as has happened to you numerous times.”    I truly appreciated her honesty and her acknowledgement of the complete disgusting actions by previous VERIZON employees and MANAGERS.
The next day October 11, 2014 I drove with both IPhones to the Verizon big box store, explained the entire story to the employee, was apologized to for a 20 minutes, the manager came out and apologized as well, GREAT CUSTOMER SERVICE! The store is located at 2028 Florence Mall Rd, Space 1139, Florence, KY, (859) 746-3790 (Manager was great so was employee). Never once offered me anything to make up for mistakes VERIZON had made in the past, which I really didn’t care because I never asked nor expected anything, but were truly grateful for my service (I am military and a Federal Law Enforcement Officer) and truly apologized for the actions of the Verizon Sore in Cincinnati Ohio (Again the manager stated the manager at the Cincinnati store lied), and especially apologized for all the lies and mis-information given to me over a three plus week time period.
            Finally, October 15, 2014, I log in to my Verizon wireless account to view my features and reactivate VERIZON’s high definition calling features and see that since September 19, 2014 (original date I purchased the IPhones) I have been charged for Verizon Cloud storage. I HAVE NEVER AGREED TO THESE SERVICES, NEVER REQUESTED THESE SERVICES, NEVER EVEN NEW THEY WERE THERE!!!! Again had to call VERIZON for the fraud and lies they are perpetrating on a daily basis, COMPLAIN to another customer service rep (call 13 10/15/2014) in order to get the fraudulent charges removed from my bill.
Conclusion
            Here I sit writing this long complaint that no one in VERIZON will ever be held accountable for, no one will answer for the lies, mis-information, and disrespect employees and VERIZON MANAGERS perpetrate even though each lie was documented by VERIZON in account notations, and no one will be accountable for the lies the retail stores tell in order to increase their QUOTA to activate a certain amount of new lines per month. I am utterly disgusted with the treatment I have received, will be requesting these notations (if they have not been deleted from my account), have documented each conversation, and recorded many of the conversations, with an end result of pretty much nothing. VERIZON does not care about their customers and could probably care less about my terrible experience. While there are several other cellular options available, they are all crooks and liars just as the perfect documented examples of VERIZON employees and management lying in this case.
Christopher

    Giogetz,
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience. I am shocked by the many representatives that you had to speak to regarding your first request. This situation should have never gotten to be complicated and resulting in multiple calls from you. I apologize on behalf of those representatives for dropping the ball. I do agree that the representatives do need to be held accountable and I would like to submit feedback for those that you worked with. I have sent you a direct message. Please reply to the direct message so I can begin submitting feedback.
AndreaS_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Employee and Group responsible being overwitten when clicking "Change".

Hi All,
I have searched the forums for a solution to a problem I have had but did not get the bottom of it.
I have done some debugging and managed to sort it and thought I'd share my findings with you.
Problem:
You are in the Web interaction centre (CRM 5.0 in my case) and you navigate to a previously saved activity.
You click the "Change" button and the Employee Responsible and the Group Responsible are changed to the ones for the currently logged on user.
You want to stop this happenning. In our case we have a call centre who amend activities and we do not want the details for employee and group changing.
Solution:
Go to SE18.
Open BADI CRM_IC_INBOX_BADI.
Go to an active implementation or create a new one.
go to method DETERMINE_GROUP_RESPONSIBLE
Add the following line of code to the method:
C_SKIP_DEFAULT_LOGIC = 'X'.
Hope this helps someone.
Many thanks
Gary Hawkins

Thank You Gary. Appreciate it.
Best Regards,
Masood Imrani S.

Can we show total enrolled employee and employee no field as well

guys
we are using oracle Learning Administrator 11.5.10,i have two query for enrollment screen in self service page,one is regarding total count show of enrolled employee ,because we have to count manually no of participant instead of automate,and 2nd one is ,we need to show to employee no field as well,right now we can't understand by name becuase in same case may appear name duplicate,
please help this regard.. thanks for supporting.

Thanks for your reply and supporting..
When we go in class detail ,where we can see information about the class like tile ,calass location etc,at the left sied of top there are four option link which are,
Clasee
Enrollments
Resource Booking
Learner Access
But when we click to entrollment link system display all enrolled employee those who pertain that class,after appearing enrollment page ,there is not field(Total enrolled employee) and we have to count manually. How can we display total filed at the bottom.
second query is,we need to display employee no field as well,is there any possibility,
hope you understand...
Thanks.

What's the difference between JRE and HotSpot

What's the difference between JRE and HotSpot?
Where can i find HotSpot for Solaris?
tks!

The difference between the two is explained at:
http://www.sun.ca/software/communitysource/hotspot/
and
http://www.sun.ca/software/communitysource/hotspot/faq.html
It's included in the J2SE v1.3.1 release.

Technical Link b/w Employee and Appraisal Template

Hi,
Can anybody please help me in finding the technical link b/w an Employee and an Appraisal Template? In other words, I need to know the table name(s) in which data is stored while appraisal processed is going on. I can view the appraisal form in IT0024 and IT0025 in PA. I can also see the objects VA, VB & VC in PP01, but where are these entries stored in the table.
We are on SAP R/3 4.7 (Enterprise) and using new Objective Setting and Appraisal Component.
Thanks
Vikas Bhatia

Hi there,
Function module 'HRHAP_DOCUMENT_GET_LIST' can be used for this purpose.
In order to find the objects you want, make sure you set the appraisal templates for calling this function as well as all of the other required parameters. If you need help for the other parameters then let me know.
The fields for the template table import parameter need to be set as follows:
plvar = Active plan version
otype = VA or VB or VC
objid = appraisal template id
This returns two tables - the appraisals and the associated documents.
Other tables you may be interested in are :
HRHAP_T
HRHAP
HRHAP_APPER
HRHAP_APPEE
Hope this helps you out. Any questions, let me know.
If this works, please award the points for this advice.
Cheers
Colin.

Setup needed for ACH payments to the Employee and Supplier

Hi,
I am looking for a document to know the setup steps needed for ACH payment to the Employees and the Suppliers. Can anybody give me a detailed document on that or let me know where I will find one?
Thanks,
Arun
Edited by: 834011 on Feb 4, 2011 3:55 PM

hi
I am working on 11i to R12 upgrade project.
All I have is SQL and flatfile from 11.5.10 instance..I need to implement ACH in R12...
How this flatfile is created in R12
Do I need to create a Etext RTF template in R12? My bank is wellsfargo
I need to create and implement ACH/credit/debit format in R12 environment.
whate are the steps to create a bank accepting flat file in R12
Can you please tell me how should create the flat file in r12? Should i create etext template or
XML RTF template..
appreciate your reply
kp

Relation Ship between User,Employee and Sales Person

Hi All,
I am unable to find out the relation between User,Employee and
Sales Person in Business One.I need to know what is the exact relation
between User,Employee and Sales Person.I can't go further without knowing
this relation in Business One.
I searched a lot regarding this relation in forums but i can't get a
relevant answer.Please help me regarding this,its an urgent requirement for
me.
Regards,
saleem

1. check the forum - this question has already been answered several times
2. read the guidelines for this forum

1242AG Bridge, VLAN and Multiple SSIDs

I have two buildings that I'm trying to configure a bridge in between them using 2 1242AG APs.
Building A
PCOFFICE SSID on VLAN 200 Radio G
ROOT_1 SSID on Native VLAN 1 Radio A
Root Bridge
Building B
FDAPC SSID on Native VLAN 1 Radio G
ROOT_1 SSID on Native VLAN 1 Radio A
We are using directional antenna. I know they are lined up properly because I have them both down and in front of me. I'm getting an error on the Building B AP that says "
No SSID with VLAN configured. Dot11Radio1 not started." and I'm unable to get this to work. The bridge was working before I added the VLAN and encryption/WPA information for the PCOFFICE and FDAPC SSIDs
Any assistance would be amazing. Thanks! Please see attached files for configurations. I know the switch is configured properly because I had this working before and forgot to save the damn configuration off the devices. I'm not having to do it over from scratch.

That did not work.
I've managed to fix the ROOT_1 and FDAPC... now I'm having an issue where I can attempt to connect to the PCOFFICE SSID but I'm unable to get a DHCP address from the server.
Here is the config for the AP with PCOFFICE on it and the switch.
SWITCH
interface GigabitEthernet3/2
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,200
switchport mode trunk
interface Vlan1
ip address 192.168.3.4 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan200
ip address 192.168.30.2 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 192.168.3.98
ip default-network 192.168.3.0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.3.1
no ip http server
ACCESS POINT
version 12.3
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
hostname AP1_ROOT_AP
enable secret 5 REMOVED
ip subnet-zero
no aaa new-model
dot11 vlan-name VLAN1 vlan 1
dot11 vlan-name pcCopper vlan 200
dot11 ssid PCOFFICE
   vlan 200
   authentication open
   authentication key-management wpa
   guest-mode
   wpa-psk ascii 7 REMOVED
dot11 ssid ROOT_1
   vlan 1
   authentication open
   authentication key-management wpa
   infrastructure-ssid optional
   wpa-psk ascii 7 REMOVED
dot11 network-map
dot11 arp-cache optional
power inline negotiation prestandard source
username Cisco password 7 REMOVED
username admin privilege 15 password 7 REMOVED
bridge irb
interface Dot11Radio0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
encryption mode ciphers tkip
encryption vlan 200 mode ciphers tkip
ssid PCOFFICE
speed basic-2.0 5.5 11.0 12.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0
no power client local
power client 17
power local cck 17
power local ofdm 17
channel 2462
station-role root access-point
antenna receive right
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
bridge-group 1 port-protected
bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
no bridge-group 1 source-learning
no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
interface Dot11Radio0.200
encapsulation dot1Q 200
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 200
bridge-group 200 subscriber-loop-control
bridge-group 200 block-unknown-source
no bridge-group 200 source-learning
no bridge-group 200 unicast-flooding
bridge-group 200 spanning-disabled
interface Dot11Radio1
no ip address
no ip route-cache
encryption mode ciphers tkip
encryption vlan 1 mode ciphers tkip
ssid ROOT_1
dfs band 3 block
speed basic-6.0 9.0 basic-12.0 18.0 basic-24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0
no power client local
power client 11
power local 11
channel 5180
station-role root bridge
antenna receive right
antenna transmit right
interface Dot11Radio1.1
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
duplex auto
speed auto
hold-queue 160 in
interface FastEthernet0.1
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet0.200
encapsulation dot1Q 200
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 200
bridge-group 200 spanning-disabled
interface BVI1
ip address 192.168.3.241 255.255.255.0
no ip route-cache
ip default-gateway 192.168.3.1
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip http help-path http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/prodconfig/help/eag
control-plane
bridge 1 route ip
line con 0
line vty 0 4
login local

Why no answer from Sony to LED and Hotspot still Broken?

Why in the world after I got suckered in to updating to ICS again (587), is LED notification for missed SMS and hotspot still not working?
Why has no one with some official stature with Sony Mobile not posted a discussion to explain what the heck is going on?
Is the group in Sweden that bad?
Maybe that is why the office is being closed and the mobile group moved to Japan. The mobile group obviously needs better management.
Bob H
ST18a Ray
AT&T
USA

Mambodoodle,
Have you called Sony Tech Support to open a case?
I have done so with each release of ICS, as I had to send my phone in for re-install of Ginberbread.
I wonder if the call-in database would have more impact vs. this online forum.
I COMPLETELY agree with you that they should at least acknowledge the situation here on the forum by someone fairly high up on the product team.
Good luck,
Bob H
ST18a Ray
AT&T
USA

Employee and contractor number generation

We are implementing Oracle HRMS Rel 11i. We would like to record regular employees and contractor details. For contractors, we need to track and report on their assignments (department, job, location) and payrate alongwith their general information. So I feel that contractors should correspond to 'Employee' person type. A further requirement is that the employee/contractor number generation needs to be automatic and separate ranges (employees starting with 1 and contractors starting with 5000) need to be used. Is it right to set contractors as employee type and is automatic number generation using separate ranges possible?

Yes, you should have contractors as employee system type, otherwise you can not pay them.
we can not define a sequence to that with out wirting custom code.
But we can do it by creating either a new user person type or user status (on assignment) and use that to track the contractors. which also gives you flexibility in reports, by filtering the assignment status or person type, which ever you want to configure.

Global employee and authorization

Hi,
I've got the following issue from our business:
A administrator from one foreign country without any access (no authorization) to an germany employee should be able to create a short or long term assignment action. The administrator knows the Global ID of the employee and wants to make a new hire action with this global ID (we have tested this procedure with a unlimited user and it works fine).
We have already tested it with a limited User and we failed because of missing reading authorization to infotyp 0000.
Does anyone see a change to realize this issue without opening the "normal" authorization?
Are there any customizing settings for the Global ID, that we forgot?
And if we have to "open" the authorization, what do you think are the minimum required infotypes (I would guess 0000, 0001)?
Thanks
Walter

Hi Walter ,
when ever you face such missing authourisations, then you just open another session with the TCODE -SU53 which will describes the detailed missing Authourisations then u will come to know which Authourisations were missing for your perticular action. and ask your Basis consultant to look into these missing authourisation, he will resolve it for you.
Regards,
Narendra Kumar Katuri.

HR cube for employee and total gross compensation

Hi,
I want to make a query which contains total number of employee and total gross compensation.
can anyone suggest me any cube for this? ı am new on BW and ı cant give a decision about cubes.
thanks,

Hi,
Have a look at the below link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/3c/f3e8372ad84a13e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
Regards,
Sunil

Employee and applicant infotype

HI all,
I need to know the concept of employee and applicant master data.
Also, the difference between employee and applicant infotype?.
Regards,
Shanthi

Hi,
Find below characteristics of few applicant infotypes.
1. IT4000(Applicant action):-The Applicant Actions infotype (4000) serves as a record of all applicant actions carried out for an applicant. These applicant actions can be:
Data entry procedures (e.g. Initial entry of basic data, Enter additional data )
Procedures that change the overall status of the applicant (e.g. Reject applicant, Put applicant on hold)
The time constraint for this infotype is 1.
2. IT4001(Applications):- The Applications infotype (4001) is used to store information on whether an application was made in response to an advertisement, or is an unsolicited application.
The time constraint for this infotype is 3.
3. IT4002 (Vacancy Assignment):-You can assign the applicant to a vacancy. The applicant will then be included in the selection procedure for this vacancy. The applicantu2019s vacancy assignment status shows where the applicant is in the selection procedure.
The time constraint for this infotype is 2.
4. IT4003 (Applicant Activities):- Applicant activities are administrative stages through which an applicant passes during the course of the application procedure. Correspondence with applicants is also handled by means of applicant activities.
The time constraint for this infotype is 3.
5. IT4004 (Status of Applicant Activity):-The Status of Applicant Activity (4004) infotype is a technical infotype that stores the status of the activities you have performed for the applicant.
6. IT4005 (Applicantu2019s Personnel Number):-The system enters this number automatically in the corresponding Applicantu2019s Personnel Number infotype (4005) for all internal applicants. This means that it contains a data record for each internal applicant.
The time constraint for this infotype is B.
7. IT0139 (Employeeu2019s Applicant Number):- This infotype can be used for following purposes.
An external applicant enters the company as an employee.
The internal applicant who is already a company employee occupies the vacant position
I think it will help you.
Regards,
Purnima

Employee and "hotspot" ssids

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for