End of 5.1(x) signature support

I'm planning my 5.x to 6.0 migrations for the year and was looking for any official Cisco statements on the End of Life/End of Sale for 5.1(x) without success. How much longer can we expect to receive 5.x signature support?

Cisco has not yet announced an End of Life or End of Sale (EOL/EOS) dates for 5.1(x).
What this means is that End of Signature support is longer than a year away.
End of signature support will be at least a year after Cisco announces EOL/EOS.
So you still have at least 1 year and possibly longer before you are forced to upgrade to 6.x for signature updates.

Similar Messages

I got an iphone. when ive insert my sim card in it, it sat sim not valid. at the end its mentioned please contact apple support. can you help me

i got an iphone. when ive insert my sim card in it, it sat sim not valid. at the end its mentioned please contact apple support. can you help me?

Your phone is probably carrier locked and you are using a SIM form a different carrier. Are you?

Adobe CDS signature support

I'm using Adobe Reader on iPhone - I see there is currently no signature support for CDS signatures. Is this in the product's road map going forward? This would nicely differentiate it from other PDF readers currently available in the App Store.

Same issue here. This is crappy service for expensive products that we paid for and didn't get off a warez site like everybody else seems to. Lost original DVD (not Adobe's fault). Can't get replacement DVD from original reseller or Adobe. Told by adobe that if I purchased download link originally I can login and download. I didn't. Told that can't download as a result because they no longer have the files. Well if they don't how come I can still login and download if I originally purchased a link? The files are there somewhere if they can still be downloaded by some individuals, like Adobe would throw away the files after two years, give me a break!
Good customer service would be to have all purchased versions avail to properly licensed customer online for download, PERIOD!
Things happend, buildings burn, theft etc. Help your customers continue doing business Adobe! Not everyone can upgrade on every micro updated version of your products, some of us have to skip a version to make a living.
This whole thing smells like a force it down you throat upgrade path scenario. Totally redicoulous in this day and age. Shame on Adobe. Adobe, state a good reason for this (I can't see any) or come clean and say you are being difficult on purpose!
By the way, If anyone has Design Premium CS3 volume media it would be appreciated. I can return the favor, we still have our Mac Design Standard and PC Master media. Or is this against the EULA to copy the disc and distrubute what we rightfully own??? Geez what a joke this is...

HT204034 I want to make a new account without payment method but there is an error ate the end says "for assistance contact iTunes support " why?

I want to make a new account without payment method but there is an error ate the end says "for assistance contact iTunes support " why?

These are user-to-user forums, to contact iTunes Support and ask them why you are getting the message to contact them :
- go to http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/ww
- click on your country's flag
- click on the Contact Support at the bottom of the left-hand column
- click on Contact iTunes Store Support on the right-hand side of the page

Obtaining hardware and signature support for AIP SSM-10

We have a 5510 which we have purchased an AIP SSM-10 card for the ASA which is already under a support contract. We now wish to add hardware maintenance for the new AIP SSM-10 card as well as signature updates. Our Cisco supplier will not confirm that we will receive signature updates with the hardware support though (we have been trying to get an answer from them since June or July now).
Could someone let us know what the correct part number is so we can ask for the specific option that will provide both hardware cover and signature updates.

i think this is what you need,
CON-SU1-AS1A1PK9
IPS SVC, AR NBD ASA5510-AIP10SP-K9
cisco smartnet support

End Routine Code not Working after Support Pack Upgrade

Hi BI Community,
We have recently upgraded to SPS17 (BW SP19) for our production system and the code deriving the values of several attributes in the end routine of the transformation for one InfoObject (as info provider) does not work anymore. We have been trying to identify the root cause but the fact is that we did not change anything to the InfoObject and its transformation and this used to work fine. The strange thing is that when we debugged the code we could see the value of the aforementioned attributes was derived correctly but the value is just not updated to the InfoObject where we still see the old values for these attributes.
We have a similar InfoObject with the same end routine code in the transformation and it is working fine. We are out of idea what could have caused this during the SP upgrade.
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Regards,
Peter

Cannot say what might have caused it but one check you can perform.
Open your transformation in change mode and you can see a button next to create end routine button, titled ' Update Behavior of End Routine Change', click on that and say all fields.
Hope it helps...
Regards,
Ashish

At the end of my rope with phone support.

I'm not sure what anyone here can do, but I need somplace to share this with. Its extremely frusturating.
Less than a month ago, I purchased my first iMac. It was a slightly older model- a 20" Aluminum 2.0ghz machine. It was purchased from a re-seller and had obviously been sitting on the shelf for a while. I know that the warranty date starts from the purchase date of the re-seller; there is a form to fill out if it needs to be changed to your actual purchase date. In a situation like mine, where the computer had been in the store for around a year, this was essential if I wanted any kind of phone support.
I filled out these forms, faxed a copy of the receipt to the number I was supposed to, and assumed everything would be fine. Within 24 hours, Boot Camp managed to screw up the OS X partition of my hard drive. I needed to make several calls to customer support, where I had to argue with all of them due to the purchase date update taking up to 72 hours to go through. After several phone calls, where I had to explain my situation 15 times and wait on hold for 45 minutes while they found out that it takes 72 hours for the change to go through, and after literally 5 hours of driving to my nearest Apple stores until someone was willing to help me with the problem even though I was "out of warranty" (Reminder- I had purchased this computer 2 days prior. New, off the shelf in the store. It absolutely should've been under warranty.) I was finally able to get the computer fixed.
Today, I figured I'd check on the status of my purchase date switch, so the next time something goes wrong with my computer I don't have to battle with tech support to get them to listen to my problem. I entered the serial number in the warranty info page, and it tells me:
*Our records indicate that your product is covered under a custom contract. For more information about your coverage, please contact us.*
*Your product is not eligible for complimentary phone support.*
When I click "contact us," the only thing that would be able to potentially help me out is the Apple Customer Service phone number. I don't feel like calling and having someone with a medium-thick accent repeat back to me what they understood my issue to be 5 times until they finally get it right. I would love to write it out so someone can just re-read it if they don't wrap their mind around it the first time.
I don't see why I should have to argue my case. I went to an Apple Authorized Reseller, swiped my credit card, and walked out with a new iMac. No, it's not the newest model, but its still new. That's money that just went in Apple's pocket, because of my purchase. There is absolutely no reason why it should be this big of a struggle just to get the warranty that I deserve. I don't feel like I'm being unreasonable or out of line in any way.
Does anyone know who I can EMAIL about this, or am I going to have to put up with the non-help I get on the phone? They're going to tell me that they can't help me out, because I'm supposedly not covered for phone support anymore. Ugh. Please help.

I'm not sure what anyone here can do
Nothing. These are user to user forums, of which Apple employees do not take part in.
Does anyone know who I can EMAIL about this,
Nobody...Apple does not offer email support/correspondence. Call support and ask immediately to speak to customer relations.

Error 7 (windows error 126). Have tried to re-install itunes but failed, twice. some end message about "mobile device not supported".

Error 7 (Windows error 126). I have tried to re-install itunes twice now, and each time " mobile device not supported" appears and the installation can not finish.

See Troubleshooting issues with iTunes for Windows updates.
Do you have any iOS devices? If the link above doesn't completely fix your library I could talk you through installing iTunes without Apple Moble Device Support for now which would at least enable you to open iTunes.
tt2

Split Valuation Config dcument & end user manual(urgent,needed for support

Hi ,
Can anyone provide me with the cnfig doc of split valuation & also end user manual for it.
I will award 10 points definately.
My id is :
ashishkhurana22 at the rate gmail
Its urgent.
Regards
Ashish

check the following:
http://www.sap-img.com/mm025.htm
http://www.sap123.com/showthread.php?t=29
http://www.sapficoconsultant.com/Bonus/Split%20Valuation%20configuration.pdf
regards,
indranil
Edited by: INDRANIL BHATTACHARYYA on Jun 19, 2008 2:48 PM

Does LiveCycle Digital Signatures support unicode pkcs #12 file?

I used Adobe Acrobat and OpenSSL to generated a unicode pkcs#12 file. Import to the Windows are all correct. But when I used for LiveCycle Digital Signatures, after signed, the one use Acrobat generated pkcs12 file signed only can show ASCII character，and other one used OpenSSL pkcs12 file to signed,signature character changed to irrecognizable.

These are two unicode pkcs #12 files. one created by openssl, another one created by Acrobat.
I used this code to sign to the PDF file.
        try    {
            // This example will upload an XDP file to the LiveCycle Repository
            ServiceClientFactory myFactory = ServiceClientFactory.createInstance(LCCommonUtil.getConnectionProps());
            // Create a SignatureServiceClient object
            SignatureServiceClient signClient = new SignatureServiceClient(myFactory);
            // Specify a PDF document to sign
            FileInputStream fileInputStream = new FileInputStream(
                    "C:\\Applications\\pdfForms\\TestDigitalSign\\ConferenceReg_flatten_sf_added.pdf");
            Document credDoc = new Document(fileInputStream);
            // Specify the name of the signature field
            String fieldName = "SignatureField1";
            // Create a Credential object
            Credential myCred = Credential.getInstance("BLC_CHINA"); // LC Server: Local Credentials
             System.out.println("******"+myCred.getSpiName());
            // Specify the reason to sign the document
            String reason = "The document was reviewed";
            // Specify the location of the signer
            String location = "New York HQ";
            // Specify contact information
            String contactInfo = "Tony Blue";
            // Create a PDFSignatureAppearanceOptions object and show date information
            PDFSignatureAppearanceOptionSpec appear = new PDFSignatureAppearanceOptionSpec();
            appear.setShowDate(true);
            appear.setShowReason(true);
            // Set revocation checking to false
            java.lang.Boolean revCheck = new Boolean(false);
            // Create objects to pass to the sign method
            OCSPOptionSpec ocspSpec = new OCSPOptionSpec();
            CRLOptionSpec crlSpec = new CRLOptionSpec();
            TSPOptionSpec tspSpec = new TSPOptionSpec();
            // Sign the PDF document
            Document signedDoc = signClient.sign(
                credDoc,
                fieldName,
                myCred,
                HashAlgorithm.SHA1,
                reason,
                location,
                contactInfo,
                appear,
                revCheck,
                ocspSpec,
                crlSpec,
                tspSpec);
            // Save the signed PDF document
            File outFile = new File("C:\\ConferenceReg_flatten_signed.pdf");
            signedDoc.copyToFile(outFile);
        catch (Exception ee) {
            ee.printStackTrace();

Reporting for System Center End point Protection -Antivirus Infections,Signature updates,Errors/failures

Hi,
We have SCEP on all servers 2008 R2 and 2012, now basically we are loking for specific information on
infections
Signature Updates
Errors/Failures.
Regards,
gautham.K
MCTS-Microsoft Exchange Adminstrator,2010

The Antimalware activity report cover your 1 request.
The Computer Endpoint Protection status covers the other two request, it is a drill through for the other reports and it is within a hidden folder.
Garth Jones | My blogs: Enhansoft and
Old Blog site | Twitter:
@GarthMJ

IDS 4230 - End of Software Support = No Signature Update?

I have one question regarding to Product Bulletin, No. 1772 - "End-of-Sale Announcement for Cisco Intrusion Detection System 4230 Platform"
According to the bulletin, the date of End of software support is July 31, 2005. Does it mean the signate update for this platfrom will not be available after July 31, 2005 or it just mean that the new version of the IDS sensor software will no longer support this platform.

As for your first question about replacing EOL equipment with another EOL equipment.
Ordinarily this would not be done, except that the IDS-4230 has hardware issues and were eligible for a no cost replacement program.
Under ordinary circumstances a failed IDS-4230 would only have been replaced with a refurbished IDS-4230.
But because of the hardware issues a failed IDS-4230 will be replaced with a IDS-4235.
RMA processes are not meant to be used for free upgrades to the newest products. The RMA process is only for replacing of failed products with either the original product or a suitable replacement. The IDS-4235 is a suitable replacement for the IDS-4230 because it has higher performance and a longer period of support.
Customers wanting to purchase a new IDS-4230 or IDS-4235 are directed to purcahse an IPS-4240 instead.
As for signature support on the IDS-4230.
The IDS-4230 signature support is tied to the End of Signature support for the version 4.1 software.
I have yet to see an official notification on CCO for the end of signature support for the IDS 4.1 software.
What this tells you is that the end of support is still more than six months away.
The posting of the notification will give you a minimum 6 months notice.
So as of the end of November you can feel comfortable that signature support for 4.1 will extend beyond end of May 2006.
Unofficially I have heard end of signature support for 4.1 being around August/September 2006, but that is still subject to change until a formal notice is posted on CCO.

Acrobat not validating signature with three pairs of ByteRange values

I have created a PDF with a Digital signature, when opened with Acrobat Reader 10 i see the signature not bieng validated with a message saying, "There are errors in the formatting or information contained in this signature (support information: SigDict /ByteRange value)". My signature's byterange contains three pairs of integers(/ByteRange[0 569 6417 400 6817 1013]) which seems to be causing this problem. Will appreciate any input regarding this.

Hi SindhuCT,
I can't speak for PDF-XChange Viewer as to whether or not they are correctly processing the signature. The only thing I can point out is you are hashing the bytes from the beginning of the file (byte 0) to byte 569. Then you are leaving a hole for the signature from byte 570 through byte 6416. You are then hashing from byte 6417 and marching off another 400 bytes which gets you to byte 6817. Finally you are telling Acrobat/Reader to leave a hole from byte 6817 to the end of the file at byte 7830. The problem is your got byte 6817 on both sides of the fence, as part of the signed data and as part of the second unsigned portion of the file. That's probably where your problem lies.
Yes, the PDF specification does say you can include other ranges, but it also says that it's not recommended because you are not going to be checking for all changes to the document. The specification says you should sign the entire file, less the hole for the signature contents.
Steve

2651XM IPS Signature Update?

Hello,
I have a 2651XM 256MB/32MB running 12.4(25) and I would like to update the IPS signature file. I see that the last update for 256MB.sdf was from Aug 2008. The latest IPS I found is IPS-sig-S518-req-E4.pkg from
http://tools.cisco.com/support/downloads/go/PlatformList.x?sftType=Intrusion+Prevention+System+%28IPS%29+Signature+Updates&mdfid=277801011&treeName=Security&mdfLevel=Model&url=null&modelName=Cisco+2651XM+Multiservice+Router&isPlatform=N&treeMdfId=268438162&modifmdfid=278279418&imname=Cisco+IDS+Access+Router+Network+Module&hybrid=Y&imst=Y
I've tried the command
ip ips sdf location flash:\\IPS-sig-S518-req-E4.pkg
ip ips sdf location flash:IPS-sig-S518-req-E4.pkg
but when I apply IPS to an interface and run 'show ip ips all' no signatures load and I get a message 'invalid token'.
I also tried seeing if the latest SDM will help but nothing.
My question is, what is it that I am doing wrong or missing? Is my router too old to be able to get the latest signature files?
Any advice or guidance to the right direction is much appreciated.
Thanks

You have a version of IOS that includes the older version of the IOS IPS feature (referred to as v4). This release only supports signature updates using the SDF formatted files. These files are no longer updated.
The signature update file you found (ending in .pkg) is the signature update package supported by Cisco's IPS appliances and is not compatible with the IOS IPS feature set.
The current IOS IPS feature (referred to as v5) also makes use of .pkg files. You will need to upgrade the IOS of your 2651 to a release in the T train such as 12.4(24)T2 to obtain the latest IOS IPS feature release.
You can find out more about the IOS IPS feature set here:
http://www.cisco.com/go/iosips
For starting with IOS IPS v5:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6634/products_tech_note09186a008097db66.shtml
Scott

RE: Upgrading IDS4210 to Signature S289

Hello,
With regard to the Upgrading of the above IDS device, just reading through the "Cisco IPS Active Update Bulletin: 06-05-2007" that was emailed to me it states:
"The S289 signature update can ONLY be applied to version 5.1(5)E1 or later sensors as follows:
This signature update is supported on the IDS-4210, IDS-4215, IDS-4235, IPS-4240, IDS-4250, IPS-4255 and IPS-4260 Series Sensor Appliances"
But reading the Readme file on the Website it states:
"The IPS-sig-S289-req-E1.pkg upgrade file can be applied to
the following sensor platforms:
- IPS-42xx Cisco Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) sensors
- IDS-42xx Cisco Intrusion Detection System (IDS) sensors (except the IDS-4210, IDS-4220, and IDS-4230)"
Which one is right?
Slightly confused.
Regards,
Mark

It is a grey area.
The IDS-4210 was End-of-sale back on Dec 6, 2003:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps4077/prod_eol_notice09186a008032d508.html
By Cisco's Policy it will support signature updates on an End-of-sale sensor for a minimum of 3 years from the End-of-sale. So Signature Update support was guaranteed by policy only up till this past Dec 3, 3006.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps4077/prod_bulletin0900aecd80358daa.html
However, nothing has been done to intentionally prevent signature udpates newer than Dec 2006 from being installed on an IDS-4210.
I am not aware of any plan at this point to intentionally prevent installation of siganture updates on an IDS-4210.
In addition understand that the policy is a minimum of 3 years, but I am not sure how much longer than 3 years it would be officially supported.
IPS 5.1 software will continue to receive signature updates for another 18 months, and it is possible these 5.1 sig updates will continue to be installable on an IDS-4210.
This confusion is likely why the 2 documents are not in sync.
In addition the E1 signature update readme was originally written for 6.0 updates and IDS-4210 is not supported in 6.0. The 5.1 versions did not switch to E1 until later. When the readme was updated to cover both 5.1 and 6.0 it is possible that the supported platform list change (to add back in IDS-4210) was just overlooked. So I am not sure if it was intentionally put in not to support the IDS-4210 or if it was an editing mistake.
Personally I would recommend going ahead and installing it (save off your config before upgrading just in case).
If it installs OK (no bugs pop up during installation), then you should be fine running it on your IDS-4210.
But if problems do arise in installation of a future signature update, then you hit that grey area. And I am not sure what the response would be if that were to happen.
I will send an email out to our internal team and see what the "official" word is on IDS-4210 sig update support.
I would, however, recommend that you go ahead and see about upgrading to a newer sensor model.

End of 5.1(x) signature support

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for