End of the road for my Color Classic???

Greetings. Lifelong Mac user here who, in the wake of Jobs’ passing, retrieved my Color Classic from the attic, thinking it would surely boot right up. It worked as recently as maybe 4-5 years ago, but all attempts over the past month to successfully boot it up have been in vain. After one purchase from Radio Shack and three from eBay, I’m 99 percent done throwing any more money at it. But I’d like to see if any of you could maybe help me out before I give up the ghost. I don’t have long, since I’ll need to return the internal HD I just bought off eBay soon if I want a refund. Here’s the rundown:
** Initially, it would boot up without the startup chime, show a grey screen for a minute or two (no icons at all), then give the eight-tone chimes of death.
** Buying a new PRAM battery led to it giving the startup chime and showing the smiling Mac, but that would give way to the flashing question mark over the floppy icon. I tried resetting PRAM, which did lead to the three successive startup chimes, but still got the question mark afterward.
** Next thing I did was buy a complete set of 7.1 discs off eBay. Using either the Disk Tools disc or the Install Me First disc, I would get the startup chime and smiling Mac, but then I couldn’t get past this message: “This startup disk will not work with this Macintosh. Use the latest installer to update this disk for this model.” For some reason, the mouse wouldn’t work when doing this, so I’d have to power off with the main switch and then eject the floppy with a paper clip. I would later learn that these discs apparently wouldn’t work on the CC because of a missing System Enabler.
** Next step: buying 7.6 Disk Tools discs off eBay. This time, the startup chime and happy Mac gave way to a sad Mac icon, a "0000000F / 00000066" error message and four-tone chimes of death. That led me to believe my factory HD was bad, sooooo …
** I bought an internal HD off eBay with 7.5 already installed on it. I had high hopes that this would finally do the trick. The heavens would open up and I would see the desktop. But ... after the swap, I was greeted once again with the flashing question mark. I disconnected and reattached the data and power cables to the HD three times, but to no avail. I tried booting off the 7.6 Disk Tools with this new HD, but got the sad Mac / "0000000F / 00000066" sequence once more. I tried booting off the 7.6 Disk Tools with no HD attached and got the same thing. This was the most depressing night of all.
** Today, with the new HD installed, I tried booting off of old 7.0.1 and 7.1 startup floppies my dad made back in the day -- and one or both of them actually progresses past the smiling Mac to the "Welcome to Macintosh" screen. But then, the "use the latest installer" screen takes over.
So this is where things stand. I'm holding out hope that I can having a working CC without spending any more money, but I'm not optimistic. Tonight I might trying washing the logic board in the dishwasher, as well as booting with the logic board disconnected and then pushing it in shortly after the startup chime (which I had tried with the factory HD without success).
Any thoughts? Ideas? Or should I call it a day, put it back on the side mantle in my living room, and go the Macquarium (or MacAntFarm) route down the road? Thanks in advance for your help!

The Color Classic is pretty straight forward to work on because the motherboard is just a matter of pulling it out.
But I don't think it's a bad motherboard so that is the good news. Sounds like the original hard drive died but before you toss it try seeing if it is just a matter of the heads being stuck. Take it in hand and gently swish it back and forth a few times to see if it that will unstick the heads. If you had a clean room I would say open the drive and gently turn the platters than zip it back up and see if it will work.
The "new' hard drive you bought sounds like it is pooched as those clicking sounds are usually an indication of a bad drive so return it ASAP for a working one or a refund. But just in case if you look at your old hard drive does it have terminators on it, they will look like two long black strips with multiple prongs attaching them to the motherboard of the hard drive. Now look at the new one, does it have any or a place for them? Though my memory is foggy on SCSI drives but that 700 might have a jumper instead but that could be wrong.
In terms of the OS, you can run System 8 on it. But you must buy the Apple release version for all Macs which comes with a floppy disk to boot your CC as well as a CD with the system SW on it. The CD is white but you will need a SCSI CD drive to install the sw. The error messages tell me that those disks are the wrong ones and not something wrong with your CC.
Now if you were into experimenting..... the following motherboards from other compact Macs will work in your CC.
The motherboard from the LC 525 is a straight swap in and even the ports on the board mate up with the holes on the rear cover. The LC 550 as well, which was actually the motherboard that the CC II used.
The motherboard from the LC 575 will also work and that adds a 68040 cpu into the mix plus the upgrade to 72 pin simms which allows you to add up to 128mb of ram with a modification to the case of the CC. The two other boards I mentioned also take 72 pin simms so you can bump up your CC from 10mb to 32mb.
I wrote a short page on my experiments here, http://www.kevinomura.com/macs/colorclassic/index.html .
In any event I think it's just your hard drive that is the problem since your video sounds good, don't toss that CC as there are still collectors out there looking for them.
On other thought, since the hard drive is on a caddy with a zif socket it's possible that some of the pins have a bit of corrosion on them. Check the one's on the hard drive side and see if they look clean, if not clean them. on the computer side that will be tougher since it's deep in the case but a few insertions of the drive might be enough to knock some of the corrosion off and make a better contact.

Similar Messages

  • IPod shuffle 2nd Gen is not recognized on PC, but other shuffles are. Software is updated. Is this the end of the road for this particular shuffle?

    iPod shuffle 2nd Gen is not recognized on PC, but other shuffles are. Software is updated. Is this the end of the road for this particular shuffle?

    Hi envisionquest,
    I'm sorry to hear you are having issues with your iPod. If your 2nd Gen iPod shuffle isn't being recognized by iTunes (but other are), you may find the troubleshooting steps outlined in the following Troubleshooting Assistant helpful:
    Apple - Support - iPod - iPod shuffle (2nd generation) Troubleshooting
    Regards,
    - Brenden

  • The End Of The Road For FCE And Other DV Editing Programs?

    I am just curious about how long the average amateur will be able to continue using FCE etc. The reason for my pessimism?
    Mini- DV cameras do seem to be on their way out.
    A popular UK "catalogue" chain-store called Argos is currently selling around 30 camcorders. Only 5 of them are mini-DV !
    The same trend is also obvious in the "serious" camera shops. DVD and HDD sales are rocketing amongst the general public who have little or no desire to edit.
    The day will come - probably extremely soon - when no amateur DV cameras are made, and any professional ones will cost the earth, along with their tapes.
    OK, we will still be able to use our existing equipment until it goes to that happy-camcorder-hunting-ground in the sky, but tapes will probably be sold at a premium.
    If this scenario were ten or twenty years away, I wouldn't mind, but I fear it will be the case by the end of this decade.
    Our only hope is that DVD, HDD and Flash Memory camcorders have been improved so that their video can be edited as easily and to as high a standard as DV can today.
    At present I can't see any sign of this happening.
    Have a nice day!
    Ian.

    One of the major issues with HDD and card based formats is workflow. A good way has to be found to archive the material you shoot. You're shooting a once a lifetime event if you're an amateur, or you're shooting something professionally that has perhaps been staged at great expense. Your card is full or your drive is filling up. You have to offload this material into a secure format which can be stored and from which it can be retrieved. Professionally this means you have to do it on location . The card media doesn't hold very much; cameras with drives built-in are not really practical as you don't want to be in a situation where you have to take the camera out of service, stop shooting while the material is downloaded. This also means the material has to be backed up onto a hard drive and stored on the hard drive. Hard drives have a high propensity for failure over time. For production media and important personal media that means you're going to have to have archival redundancy. You can burn your media to disk or DAT tape or put it on multiple drives. All of this takes time and expense. The workflow issues for memory-based formats still need to be resolved, and the camera manufacturers, just have they have done nothing to facilitate post production with their choices of compression formats, have done nothing to create viable workflows for non-tape based system.
    Most of my professional work is done in FCP. We shoot in HDV, recording on tape and simul-recording onto a DTE. The DTE material, QuickTime clips, is dumped to a separate hard drive for editing, and the second drive is shelved as it fills and projects are completed. The tape is kept as a redundant second source. I've rarely had to access the tape. Only when there has been an operator error. The problem with card-based and HDD based formats is that for safety's sake a second archive, the redundant backup, needs to be created before the camera card can be erased and put back in service. That either needs having a lot of camera cards available (which are still really expensive), or having someone on location with an edit system processing and backing up your material to re-cycle the cards.

  • Have family plan with 250 data which I almost use each month.  Going on vacation and will be on the road for two weeks.  Should I up my data for a month then change back.  Is it worth it or should I just run over and pay the extra 15 per gig?

    have family plan with 250 data which I almost use each month.  Going on vacation and will be on the road for two weeks.  Should I up my data for a month then change back.  Is it worth it or should I just run over and pay the extra 15 per gig?

    Hello mlazaretti. Vacation time is awesome. (Especially a road trip!) Since you will be going out for two weeks, you never know if having extra data may come in handy. I highly recommend switching to the next tier up so this way you have more data. This way it is only $10.00 more versus $15.00, and you dont have to worry about overages. Then change back at the start of the next billing cycle.
    If you need help making this change let us know! Have a safe trip!
    NicandroN_VZW
    Follow us on twitter @VZWSupport

  • Mystery markings at the end of the road- next to a...

    Hi,
    Have noticed some mystery markings at the end of the road, right next to BT's current equipment.
    Markings measure approx 1.2m x 45cm
    Infinity is due to be enabled on 1/03/2012 so looks like BT might have started the rollout.
    Exchange is Kempston (Bedfordshire).

    philt1808 wrote:
    Lol - beat me to it
    i was watching you like a hawk
    toekneem
    http://www.no2nuisancecalls.net
    (EASBF)

  • End of the line for AW???

    I just wanted to share a few words (and frustrations.) Many moons ago when I was a student in university, I learned how to do basic word processing on Macs that were available to students in the computer lab. These were Mac computer that had been donated by Apple.
    Over the past 20 years or so I have been involved in education and I have operated my own company. I have purchased at least 12 or 15 computers over the years. I'm currently using a G5 tower with 2 Gigs of ram.
    Much of my business is set up and run using Appleworks. Business letters, faxes, etc. etc. all have company logos and letterhead and all of my customers are in AW databases. I also use the mail merge feature to print some 3,000 envelopes per month.
    We have been using OS Tiger for the past year or two and yesterday I purchased a new Imac and I also upgraded my computer to Leopard. Much to my dismay AW is not working in this new OS on my computer. When I print my business letters, the artwork does not appear on the page, the database crashes way too often, and I often get the spinning beachball of death that causes me to sit at my computer and stare at the screen for many wasted minutes. I'm not a geek but I understand that it has something to do with Rosetta and I know that Apple has announced that it will no longer support AW. I guess that this is the end of the line for me as far as AW is concerned. (and yes I have repaired permissions and done other basic maintenance.)
    I now have to invest a huge amount of time and energy to re-do all of my business templates in Word or some other word processing software and to set up a new data base system to keep track my customers. I consider myself to be a loyal Apple customer, and after all the money and time I have invested in Apple products, this is a huge let down for me and a gigantic disappointment. It is all so frustrating.
    I guess I won't be visiting these forums any more after I convert all of my data and I wanted to thank those that have helped me in the past.
    Cheers.
    BTW, can anyone recommend a good database program similar to AW?

    First, let me say that I'm not running Leopard, so I won't be able to help directly in getting your AW working. However I think I can help point you in the right direction. I am confident others will fill in the details.
    I'm not a geek but I understand that it [problems with AW] has something to do with Rosetta
    Rosetta is what allows programs written for the Power PC to run on Intel processors. It has been used with AppleWorks under both Tiger and Leopard by some people here with no problem.
    I know that Apple has announced that it will no longer support AW. I guess that this is the end of the line for me as far as AW is concerned.
    It should be possible to get AW to work fine on your current machine and use it for years to come. I would certainly start thinking about how to move off of AW, but it certainly doesn't have to be today (assuming you can get it working now).
    BTW, can anyone recommend a good database program similar to AW?
    Filemaker has come out with a product "Bento" that is being billed as a simple DB program. It may not be powerful enough for you. Also it won't directly import AW databases. However you can give it a try for free and see what you think:
    http://www.bentotrial.com

  • My midi/audio interface Edirol PCR 1  won't work with Yosemite and Roland have no driver update. Is this the end of the line for this device.

    My midi/audio interface ( Edirol PCR1) will not interface with Yosemite 10.10 and Roland have no driver update, is there any fix for the problem or is the end of the line for this device.

    Same problem here, what a shame as this has been my favorite portable keyboard for ages. Whenever I see one in a store(very rarely) I'll grab it.

  • Hi - I want to establish my Time capsule at the other end of the house, for security reasons.  If a fire occurs at my computer,  it is not much help if the backup is adjacent.

    Hi - I want to establish my Time capsule at the other end of the house, for security reasons.  If a fire occurs at my computer,  it is not much help if the backup is adjacent.    From what I have read, the TC requires an ethernet connection to the outside world (which is where my computer is).  I don't understand this; I think my wireless network (airport) should be able to handle backups, since it is capable of broadcasting video, which has a much higher transfer bit-rate.  So, why can't I use Airport for my backups  to Time Capsule?
         -  Thanks,  Gareth

    You can absolutely back up to your time capsule via wifi.  This is what the majority of people with a time capsule do.  It connects to a modem or WAN access point via ethernet though.

  • What is the best way to back up aperture on imac and then take the library on the road for my mcp?

    I have just aquired a lacie triple interface ext drive 1tb, to vault aperture and then take on the road for mcp to access the aperture iamges, looking at some of this forum I dont think this is as easy as i thought so i thought I'd better get some help!
    I have not activated the ext hard drive yet just in case, my imac is backed up with time machine presently.

    Hi Dave
    I use a MBP  and a Mac Mini when on the road
    It has always been my practice not to use the system drive for my photographic data where ever possible always using external drives eSATA and FW for the MBP and using USB drives for Vaults and Clones
    I am working with a growing Libary at the moment 720GB + 500 GB of referenced files on a second HDD
    I will be scooting down the A30 with a couple of HDDs and my MBP on my way home and whilst there I will be using the my MBP  to add new images to my aperture Libary and Referenced Drive and work on some of my existing files
    For the last four years I have used a Ruggedised 500GB FW/USB drive to store copies of my CF cards when on a shoot you need the MBP to transfer from CF to HDD but once on the HD any future transfer is quick.
    Only reusing it when I have the contents in at least two external HDD's at different locations
    I have a Mac Pro and Wiebetech 4bay eSATA external at my studio (It takes bare drives)
    Two years ago I did move to using an eSATA EspressCard|34 with my MBP (which only has a 200GB internal) which has ineffect given me a  2TB external running as if it's an internal drive (Ruggedised eSATA) as my Aperture Library and PS scratch file drive.
    And 2TB USB drives as Vault backup
    I have never been a Time Machine fan from the early days when there were problems when running Aperture, I'm sure it's improved but I have my own work flow routine
    I use SuperDuper form Shirt Pocket
    I recently purchased a couple of 2TB WD Green 2TB SATA 6Gbps 64MB Cache Power Saving Internal Hard Drives
    for £60 each and two empty Lacie cases for £18 each from Amazon so storage has never been cheaper I normally use bare drives but the cases are better when I am away from base and its easy to remove them
    Hope this helps
    Phil G
    PS. If you're down Penwith over the next month look me up and I show you the set up

  • Hello, in how many times system allows to be introduce the restriction code. I did 9 attempts, the next one is the end of the road or no. Thanks

    Hello, in how many times system allows to be introduce the restriction code. I did 9 attempts, the next one is the end of the road or no. Thanks

    No limit

  • End of the line for my LaserWriter 320?

    I've been using an old Apple LaserWriter 320 for 12 years (really!) and did get it to work with OSX (I have 10.4.6 now) and it hasn't been a happy printer lately. First, the computer wouldn't talk with the Asante Ethernet to Local Talk adapter, so I changed the cable. That worked because the Asante was receiving the signal, but there still is no communication between the Asante and the LaserWriter. I changed that cable as well, and it's still the same thing. I've also reset the Asante and the LaserWriter (because sometimes that worked in the past) and that did not help. (And I know someone will ask this -- Yes, I am choosing the LaserWriter in the print dialog box.) This brings me down the three possibilities: hardware problem with the Asante, hardware problem with the printer, or the OS just really can't communicate with this old printer. In the prefs, it shows that the laser printer has driver 10.4 and PPD 4.0. The dialog box (which comes up when I try to print w/MS Word) still always tells me it can't communicate with the printer.
    In case you're wondering why I bother with a laser printer, it is because I do have a need for a lot of B/W printing and hate to use my ink jet for that (but I've been forced to lately).
    So it is really the end of the line for my good old Laser Writer?

    Oops - I had forgotten how much my printer hates my fonts! I ran a test page with the Times font (something I know the printer will handle, and it did). Up until this point, it kept saying "Printer not responding" and the Asante showed no transmission to the printer. Hmmm... neither of these errors pointed out the fact it coudln't handle the fonts. (But error messages so rarely do help.) So then I took the doc I really wanted to print, saved it as a PDF, and then printed and it worked. I remember OS 9 having a feature in the print dialog box that helped me work around this problem, but there isn't anything like that in OS X. Any ideas?

  • A different take on the "Save For Web" color shift issue...

    Ok, everyone who has fussed much with photoshop and "Save For Web" knows about the color shift issue. If you want your colors to look right after you "save for web", you have to work in the sRGB colorspace, and have Proof Colors checked (soft proofing on) and the proof color setup set to Monitor RGB, otherwise what you get looks terrible when displayed in a browser.
    But of course if you are editing for print, this is exactly what you DON'T want to do. Well, I work in both. In fact, often the same images, and I want them to appear as close as reasonably possible in both print and web formats, and without a lot of fussing on my part. And I'm pickiest about the print mode, since I have the most control there, so that's the way I want to edit by default.
    Nothing new here.
    Now comes the interesting part (in my mind, anyway). Obviously there is a known remapping -- because PhotoShop DOES it when you select Proof Colors. So the inverse mapping must also be known (with some gamut issues, but I'm not concerned with those, because, after all, I'm VIEWING it on a monitor anyway!). What I want is a plug-in that automatically applies that inverse mapping so that, when I do a Save For Web, I end up with the colors I've been viewing all the time when setting the shot up in print mode. Then, too, I don't have to worry about what mode I'm in when I'm editing -- it just fixes it when doing a save-for-web.
    Again, I want to edit in my normal print mode (typically ProPhoto colorspace, and with soft-proofing off or set to the printer/medium combination I expect to use), then do a single operation (might be a multi-step action) to "screw up" my colors so that when I then do a "Save-For-Web", the resulting image, when viewed on the average color-stupid browser, looks like the image I've been seeing in Photoshop.
    Anyone know of such a beast?   I would gladly pay for a plug-in that really works and fixes the problem.
    And if you have other solutions, I'm interested, but the absolute requirement is that it I do one single edit pass for my colors for both print and web use, and I get what I see on the screen in PS on both the prints and on the web display (i.e., working in sRGB/Monitor RGB mode all the time won't cut it). And PREFERABLY, let me do all my editing work in the ProPhoto (or at least AdobeRGB) colorspace so I have a gamut closer to what the printer can do.
    Anyone got a decent solution for this?

    Sorry, I think I'm being unclear.  This has nothing to do with individual monitor profiles.  In Proof Setup, "Monitor RGB" amounts to turning off ALL color management, and simply letting the monitor do what it will.  It is what the vast majority of web browsers do (even if the operating system provides color management, the browsers don't take advantage of it), so that is what you need to consider for images that will be viewed on a web browser.  If you convert your image to sRGB,  select Monitor RGB in Proof Set up, and turn on Proof Colors, you will see the image as it would appear on a web browser (after you save it as a jpg or use "Save For Web/Devices" to save it as a jpg).   Since almost everyone is running different uncalibrated monitors, there will be lots of variation in how it will look to them, so precise control of the color is unimportant.
    That said, I would expect the color on a calibrated monitor (such as the one I use when editing) to be reasonably close to the colors I am seeing while editing in PS.  To the extent a monitor deviates from "calibrated", those colors will vary, but a good monitor should show good colors.   Unfortunately, this is NOT the case, as my previous post shows.  The colors produced by the steps above are oversaturated and significantly shifted in hue.  There is, to my mind, anyway, no reason for this.  Adobe clearly knows what the mapping is between the colors as it displays them in PS and the un-controlled "Monitor RGB" -- that is, it is the color map they are using during normal editing display.  If they were to reverse-apply that map prior to saving it as a jpg, then the image would appear on a browser on that same (presumably calibrated) monitor very similar to what you set up when editing.  Anyone else viewing the image on a web browser with a calibrated monitor would also see good colors.  To the extent other viewers' monitors are out of calibration, their colors will suck, but there's nothing you can do about that.
    I guess in some sense I AM "asking for a Color-Mamangement-solution for a "non-Color-Management-situation", but specifically I'm asking for PS Color Management to do the best it can for non-Color-Managed situations that we all face every day.
    Does that make more sense?

  • Looking for a better solution to the "Save for web" color shift issue

    Ok, everyone who has fussed much with photoshop and "Save For Web" knows about the color shift issue. If you want your colors to look right after you "save for web", you have to work in the sRGB colorspace, and have Proof Colors checked (soft proofing on) and the proof color setup set to Monitor RGB, otherwise what you get looks terrible when displayed in a browser.
    But of course if you are editing for print, this is exactly what you DON'T want to do. Well, I work in both. In fact, often the same images, and I want them to appear as close as reasonably possible in both print and web formats, and without a lot of fussing on my part. And I'm pickiest about the print mode, since I have the most control there, so that's the way I want to edit by default.
    Nothing new here.
    Now comes the interesting part (in my mind, anyway). Obviously there is a known remapping -- because PhotoShop DOES it when you select Proof Colors. So the inverse mapping must also be known (with some gamut issues, but I'm not concerned with those, because, after all, I'm VIEWING it on a monitor anyway!). What I want is a plug-in that automatically applies that inverse mapping so that, when I do a Save For Web, I end up with the colors I've been viewing all the time when setting the shot up in print mode. Then, too, I don't have to worry about what mode I'm in when I'm editing -- it just fixes it when doing a save-for-web.
    Again, I want to edit in my normal print mode (typically ProPhoto colorspace, and with soft-proofing off or set to the printer/medium combination I expect to use), then do a single operation (might be a multi-step action) to "screw up" my colors so that when I then do a "Save-For-Web", the resulting image, when viewed on the average color-stupid browser, looks like the image I've been seeing in Photoshop.
    Anyone know of such a beast?   I would gladly pay for a plug-in that really works and fixes the problem.
    And if you have other solutions, I'm interested, but the absolute requirement is that it I do one single edit pass for my colors for both print and web use, and I get what I see on the screen in PS on both the prints and on the web display (i.e., working in sRGB/Monitor RGB mode all the time won't cut it). And PREFERABLY, let me do all my editing work in the ProPhoto (or at least AdobeRGB) colorspace so I have a gamut closer to what the printer can do.
    Anyone got a decent solution for this?

    Chris
    I spent all day Googling and doing side by side comparisons of my old and new systems.
    My display is a Dell U2410. It has several presets, including sRGB and Adobe RGB. I've been using sRGB.
    On my OLD system, (Win XP, PsCS2, DwCS4) there seems to be no distinction between color managed and non color managed apps, even on this wide gamut display. I could capture (digital camera) in Adobe RGB, open and edit in PsCS2, save as .psd, convert to CMYK for print, or convert to sRGB for SFW. All images looked identical and they printed and displayed perfectly. I thought this was normal, and seemed logical. This also seems to be the source of my incorrect assumptions. I was trying to get my new machine to behave like my old one.
    So I get this new machine (Windows 7, PsCS5, DwCS5) and now (still in sRGB display mode) all color managed apps appear de-saturated. Non color managed apps are OK. If I switch the display to Adobe RGB, color managed apps are OK, but non color managed apps are way too saturated. From my investigation, I believe this is normal behavior on a wide gamut display. I've tried changing the Control Panel > Display > Screen Resolution > Advanced settings > Color Management options, but to no avail. Either I'm missing something, or Windows 7 is doing color management differently.
    It seems my only option now is to use Adobe RGB display setting for Ps, etc. and switch to sRGB for Dw and non color managed apps. Or, have 2 separate files for print and web. I've Googled 'til my eyes are numb and still not sure I'm getting this. Any enlightenment would be greatly appreciated.
    Finally, I don't see an edit function here, so I can't remove my previous incorrect reply. Moderator, please feel free to do so.
    Thanks

  • IP - end of the road? new product but there is a newer one? my goodness

    Hi,
    Some of my friends have done IP projects and become experts in it in 1 year.
    Now, i heard there is a some changes to SAP product for planning by the name of BPC.
    what is going to happen to the following:
    1. IP courses.
    2. IP skills learnt & market value.
    3. IP books and materials. Investments made in IP courses.
    4. IP support packages and the product itself.
    5. Existing customers who just signed to purchase IP or implemented or midway through implementation using IP? Are they given any roadmap to migrate from IP to BPC? How should they plan for the future for their planning system which is new and already, there is a newer kid on the block called BPC?
    6. What is the rationale for giving the world IP and in such a short time kind of providing another product called BPC?
    7. How should IT explain to CEO / CFO about this big change in such a short time? If they knew what is to come, how different will things be?
    8. What is meant by IP will co-exist with BPC? Is BPC not meant to replace IP with same functionality? When will IP be extinct?
    9. How to learn about BPC? What jobs can IP consultants do after the end of IP?
    10. Where is or will be having the most installations for BPC in the next few months?
    Anyone can give your comments on the above questions ?
    Edited by: pointes rexiproca on Mar 5, 2008 3:34 PM

    hi Srin,
    I quote
    "Next In IP u can do only planning but in BPC we have other parts and recently acquired by SAP being good product."
    >>> But there are other even more proven products for consolidation, is there not?
    I quote
    "About Investment On IP: Yes one has invested on IP , in the same fashion SAP also invested ON IP. SAP has decided to goto BPC means they have studied in depth about the product features and found very good and acquired that product and suggesting in future for sap customers also."
    >>> so how long more is IP of market value? As of this year 1H, can i say no more value given even SAP advisng customers not to get IP but BPC ?
    I quote
    "What ever may be the product: Functionality will be the same as earlier we had BPS now IP. A person who knows BPS can get into IP within few days. In the same Fashion with the knowledge of BPS, IP v can go for BPC also easily."
    >>>> if functionalities are the same for planning, is there a need to purchase a 3rd party product? why not just use IP?  BPC has consolidation. What is the use if companies wont be using that?
    I quote
    "BPC consists of Planning & Consolidation also which IP does not have.
    BPC is proven product. I hope for next 3-5 years there will be any more new releases towards planning & consolidation. (Except of new versions: that is default)"
    >>> If customers already using other also proven leading software for Consolidation, does that mean they do not need the consolidation engine of BPC?
    regards
    Pointez Rexiproca
    Edited by: pointes rexiproca on Mar 6, 2008 3:06 PM

  • Please Help me fix the css for font colors in this menu!

    I have finally figured out how to make my drop down menu work, but I need some help troubleshooting this code. I have fiddled with the code for several hours and have still been unable to fix it. My issue is that I have been unable to distinguish between the top level links and the dropdown menu links. I want the dropdown menu links to be a light cream color. However, they are being displayed as the same color as the hover color.
    Here is the webpage loaded online: www.theriveroverlook.com/Trial.html
    If you hover over "Accomodations", you will see the issue. The green color of the hovered links is also being displayed in the lower level menu. This makes them unable to be read easily and presents a problem.
    Here is applicable css code:
    body {
               width:1170px;
               height:1300px;
               background-image:url(BackgroundImage.jpg);
    background-repeat:no-repeat;
    padding-left:0px;
    padding-right:0px;
    padding-top:0px;
    /* BEGIN HORIZONTAL DROP-MENU */
    #navcontainer {
              margin-left:0px;
              padding-left:0px;
              margin-top:200px;      
              background-image:url(MenuBarFINAL.png);
              background-repeat: no-repeat;
              height: 192px;
                          width:1170;
    nav {
                           font-size:22px;
                           font:"goudy-bookletter-1911";
                           font-weight:500;
              text-align: left;
              padding-top: 65px;
                          margin-left:0px;
                          padding-left:0px;
    nav ul ul {
              display: none;
    nav ul li:hover > ul {
              display: block;
    nav ul {
                                  margin-left:0px;
              padding: 0 0px;
              list-style: none;
              display: inline-table;
    /*Top level nav spacing, listing*/
    nav ul li {
              float: left;
                           margin-left:0px;
    nav ul li:hover a {color:#060;}
    nav ul li:active a {color:#300;}
    nav ul li:visited a {color:#900;}
    /*top level text display*/
    nav ul li a {
              display:inline;
              text-decoration: none;
                          color:#55390e; 
    ul.accomdrop a {
              color:#fbf1cc;
    #accomdrop {
                      background-image:url(dropdownpng.png);
                                  margin-top: 13px;
                                  width: 155px;
                                  padding-bottom: 69px;
                                  background-repeat:no-repeat;
    nav ul ul li {
                                  font-size:18px;
                                  font-weight: 100;
              float: none;
                          color:#e4ddc8;
    #home {
              margin-left: 75px;
    #accom {
              margin-left: 35px;
              width: 120 px;
              padding-right: 25px;
    #holston {
              padding-top: 10px;
              padding-bottom:10px;
              padding-left: 17px;
              word-wrap:normal;
              text-align:center;
              width:120px;
    #tennessee {
              padding-top: 10px;
              padding-bottom: 15px;
              padding-left:17px;
              word-wrap: normal;
              text-align:center;
              width: 120px;
    #french {
              padding-top: 8px;
              padding-bottom: 10px;
              padding-left: 17px;
              word-wrap:normal;
              text-align:center;
              width: 120px;
    #amenities {
              margin-left: 15px;
              width: 110px;
    #packages {
              margin-left: 285px;
              width:120px;
    #packdrop {
              background-image:url(dropdownpng2.png);
              margin-left:-35px;
              margin-top: 13px;
                                  width: 155px;
                                  padding-bottom: 80px;
                                  background-repeat:no-repeat;
    #romance {
                        padding-top: 5px;
              padding-bottom:8px;
              padding-left: 2px;
              word-wrap:normal;
              text-align:center;
              width:150px;
    #golf {
              padding-top: 15px;
              padding-bottom:12px;
              padding-left:2px;
              word-wrap:normal;
              text-align:center;
              width: 150px;
    #photo {
              padding-top: 5px;
              padding-bottom:13px;
              padding-left:2px;
              word-wrap:normal;
              text-align:center;
              width:150px;
    #cook {padding-top: 7px;
              padding-bottom:10px;
              padding-left:2px;
              word-wrap:normal;
              text-align:center;
              width:150px;
    #fish {padding-top: 10px;
              padding-bottom:10px;
              padding-left:2px;
              word-wrap:normal;
              text-align:center;
              width:150px;
    #directions {
              margin-left: 20px;
    I really appreciate any help you can give me! Sometimes, you stare at something so long that you can't see the obvious problem before you!
    Jaime

    See if this helps:
    http://alt-web.com/DEMOS/CSS-Multi-colored-drop-menu.shtml
    Nancy O.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Help for a baffled beginner

    Ive just installed Oracle Express to help me go through a phase test. Ive created 3 tables under the SYSTEM username that I started the database with. Ive populated the tables with some data Now whenever I try and enter any SELECT command it tells me

  • Authorisation of Segment

    Dear Sirs, Can any one tell me is it possible to give authorisation segment wise? How? thanks in advance.

  • It make sense changing from DB persistence mode to DBFS (or FSDB)mode?

    hi, we are running on NW04 SPS17 KM 6.0.17.0.0 we have a portal with 30.000 (stimated) users access. CM is configured in cluster mode, with a unique DB. In the KM area, we use a CM repository in DB mode, wich contains all the documents of the portal(

  • Re-import IMAP messages to Mail

    I am trying to get messages from a local backup of my imap-account to show up in Mail and to get uploaded to the mail server. When I copy the emlx-files to the mailbox folder, the messages do not show up in Mail. I also tried setting up a dummy accou

  • AppleTV distorts sound, output level too high

    Hi I have a problem and have already tried a number of solutions. My AppleTV sound is distorted, due to the output level being too high. Initially I used the TVs headset jack-connector for connecting to my amp, and lowering the output level from the