ER: restricting auto binded objects types 11g.

When we want to create an autobind between a backing bean and a JSF web page, bindings code is created for all object on the page. Even panel box, faced etc.
There is many lines of code on backing bean. We d'ont even use one time for many object type.
In general we use input text, list item etc. Others are unnecessery.
In my opinion if there is a configuration which supplies to chose binded item types it will be very good.
lines of code will be decreased in backing bean and complexy is decreased too.
For example just input test item can be autobind.
Thanks.

Hi,
When I first started out with this, I thought the autobind function was pretty neat as I thought it would save me time and effort from having to bind objects myself. Boy, was I wrong. Adding/removing anything from the Jspx page while debugging requires a restart. That was enough to stop me from using it further.
When you create a new JSF Page, click on *"Page Implementation"* and make sure you have the *"Do Not Automatically Expose UI Components in a Managed Bean"* selected. That way, you won't get into the trouble you are in. I agree with Frank that you should only bind components when and if you need to only. If you have already created the page and would like it to stop automatically binding each UI component, follow the steps below:
1) Open your JSPX page in source code view, remove the commented line below.
Optionally, you can replace it with the following code to point to your managed bean that handles the user actions.
2) Open faces-config.xml in source code view, and look for your backingBean that is auto Binding each UI component. Within its <managed-bean>...</managed-bean> tags, you will see another oracle-jdev comment like the one below. Remove that as well.
JDev should stop autobinding / removing UI components from the backing bean now.
Regards,
Chan Kelwin

Similar Messages

Limit object type per equipment category

Hi All,
without using a user exit, is it possible to restrict the allowed object types per equipment category? Thank you.
Hans

No

How can I use object type in Jdeveloper 11g?

Dear friends
I made some object types(Database layer) and each one refer to functions or procedures to generate table or view, for instance in one of my project I could make a View Object with this function and generate a table:
Select * from table (genarate_emp(2019))
In this sample I used a static value (2019) and I did it perfectly, but I want to make a table with dynamic value for instance I would like to set partial trigger of this view object and get dynamic value from the other view object.
Please help me if you have any suggestions.
Best regards,
Babak Saraie

Hi Babak
It's a common requirement on posting to this forum that you describe which version of JDeveloper you're using and what technologies (obviously ADF BC in this case).
For making the static value dynamic within your View Object, are you familiar with the View Object bind variables/bind parameters? This will allow you to define a named variable in your VO that you can set programmatically or even let the user set. Play around with those first and see if they solve one part of your problem, then come back to the forum for the second part.
Regards,
CM.

Restrictions with object types

Hello
Among other restrictions Oracle 8.1.7 does not support (1) change of definitions of types that have dependent data and (2)replication of object columns and object tables.
(1) While it is possible to add columns to existing relational tables and even change the size of columns it is not possible to do so with object types. This may expose a significant limitation for schema migration and maintainance. Is there any other support for those requirements, any workarounds other than crafting table copy scripts from scratch?
(2) This seems to make a couple of good things in Oracle unavailable with objects. No fault tolerance through replication? No standby database? What (development and runtime efficient) options remain with objects in that category?
Do the limitations persist in Oracle 9i?
What about tool support in Oracle 9i? DBA Studio, for example, is rather poor in dealing with objects in 8.1.7 - no browsing and management of object schema and data, you cannot even select an existing object type for a table column.
Are there other restrictions one should be aware of before touching objects?
Any experiences and information greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Thomas
null

Thomas,
Do you have some specific applications that you have in mind to use Oracle Objects? Do you plan to use type evolution and replication?
Oracle9i Object-Relational Technology has reached a major milestone with several 'completeness' features. As Arvind pointed out, in Oracle9i, type evolution can propogate changes to dependents. Object replication is also supported in Oracle9i.
Although Enterprize Management tools do provide easy-to-use GUIs, there are some limitations in handling Objects, especially when there are nesting involved. Fortunately, SQL*Plus can be used to remedy some of these limitations.
Regards,
Geoff

An object so that I can restrict IE03 by equipment type (field EQTYP)

Hi,
I'm looking for an object so that I can restrict IE03 by equipment type (field EQTYP) but I can't seem to find a good fit.
I hope you can help me.
Thanks a lot.

Unfortunately IE03 has no authorization check for Equipment type in standard SAP. May be you can change the code and introduce a check. Also apprarently there is no standard authorization object that has EQTYP in it.
Regards.
Ruchit.

Bind problem for varchar2 of object type??

Hello all,
I am trying out binding Oracle Object types to java object types using the SQLData interface.
I created a simple object type called employee with the syntax
create type employee as object (empName varchar2(50),empNo number(9));
I then created a class called EmplyoeeObj which implements the interface. The code for the readSQL and
writeSQL methods are below:
public void readSQL(SQLInput stream, String typeName) throws SQLException {
empName = stream.readString();
empNo = stream.readInt();
public void writeSQL(SQLOutput stream) throws SQLException {
stream.writeString(empName);
stream.writeInt(empNo);
empName is a String and empNo is an int. The code that does the calling is:
String query = "{call test_employee(?)}";
Map map = connection.getTypeMap();
map.put("CISWEB.EMPLOYEE",
Class.forName("test.jdbc.EmployeeObj"));
/*Set back the type map with the new mappings*/
connection.setTypeMap(map);
/*Create a statement to make the call */
ocs = (OracleCallableStatement)connection.prepareCall(query);
ocs.registerOutParameter(1,
OracleTypes.STRUCT,
"CISWEB.EMPLOYEE");
boolean isWorked = ocs.execute();
System.out.println("Execute finished........");
Object outParam = ocs.getObject(1);
System.out.println("Object was obtained........" + outParam);
System.out.println("name:" + ((EmployeeObj)outParam).getName());
As can be seen I have created a stored procedure which has one out parameter. All
this preocedure does is assign an Employee object to the out parameter with a name of
'Alex' and an employee number of 9.
The code runs and all but I get this strange result. In the print I am getting the employee number
coming out correctly but the employee name comes out as 3 question marks. I can't understand why
"Alex" does not out. I have tried different things such as adding a new varchar2 to the object type and new a new integer and what I observer is that I keep getting 3 question marks coming back instead of whatever I assign for the employee name. Could someone please help and let me know what could be wrong?
I have no clue as what is causing this weird behaviour.
Thanks.

Hi,
i have not really a idea. But at the next step i would
try the same procedure with in/out parameter and use a
initialized string. Maybe there is a problem to
determine the length of string.
Bye ThomasThanks for you reply Thomas,
This is the code for stored procedure that I use. As can be seen I just assign an employee to the
out parameter.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE test_employee(emp out EMPLOYEE) IS
BEGIN
emp := EMPLOYEE('Alex',49);
END;
Now in the java code when the statement >>
System.out.println("name:" + ((EmployeeObj)outParam).getName());
executes I get the name coming out as the String: "???". That is three question marks. It is very weird. I then attempted to create the object using JPublisher and I get the same result. I attempted not only to use hte SQLData interface but Oracle's ORAData interfaces as well. I went to to create a table with column as the EMPLOYEE type and use in insert to put the same object and and then sellect * from the table to the the and I still get the 3 question marks for the name and the number comes out correctly.
I am not sure what could be causing the text to come out as three question marks. I am using Oracle 9.2.0.4.0 and the ojdbc_g.jar drivers version :9.2.0.3.0. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks

OBIEE 11G Web Services - How to find Catalog Object Type

Hi All,
I am trying to access the Web Catalog objects available in OBIEE 11.1.1.5 through the Web Services API. I am able to read object names in "/shared" folders using the getSubItems() web service. My objective is as follows
1. Categorize catalog objects based on their type (Analysis, Agent, Action, Condition, etc...)
2. If possible, read the presentation column information that each object is using
The ItemInfoType structure only provides for types - Folders, Link, Missing, Object, etc... and does not help me in identifying the actual catalog object type. Any help on this regard is appreciated.
Thanks,
Raj.

Is there any solution for this? We also face similar issue recently...

Partitioned IOT of Object Type - mapping table not allowed for bitmap index

Hi,
looks like a feature available for standard Partitioned IOTs is not supported for object based tables, namely the MAPPING TABLE construct to support secondary local bitmap indexes.
Can you confirm behaviour is as expected/documented?
If so, is a fix/enhancement to support mapping table for object-based Partitioned IOTs in the pipeline?
Results for partition-wise load using pipelined table function are very good, look-ups across tens of millions of rows are excellent.
Environment = Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
OS = Oracle Enterprise Linux Server release 5.2 (Carthage) 2.6.18 92.el5 (32-bit)
Here's the potted test-case...
1) First the non object based Partitioned IOT - data is range-partitioned across the alphabet
CREATE TABLE IOT_Table (
textData VARCHAR2(10),
numberData NUMBER(10,0),
CONSTRAINT IOT_Table_PK PRIMARY KEY(textData))
ORGANIZATION INDEX MAPPING TABLE PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire
PARTITION BY RANGE (textData)
(PARTITION Text_Part_A VALUES LESS THAN ('B') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_B VALUES LESS THAN ('C') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_C VALUES LESS THAN ('D') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_D VALUES LESS THAN ('E') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_E VALUES LESS THAN ('F') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_F VALUES LESS THAN ('G') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_G VALUES LESS THAN ('H') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_H VALUES LESS THAN ('I') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_I VALUES LESS THAN ('J') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_J VALUES LESS THAN ('K') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_K VALUES LESS THAN ('L') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_L VALUES LESS THAN ('M') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_M VALUES LESS THAN ('N') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_N VALUES LESS THAN ('O') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_O VALUES LESS THAN ('P') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_P VALUES LESS THAN ('Q') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Q VALUES LESS THAN ('R') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_R VALUES LESS THAN ('S') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_S VALUES LESS THAN ('T') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_T VALUES LESS THAN ('U') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_U VALUES LESS THAN ('V') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_V VALUES LESS THAN ('W') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_W VALUES LESS THAN ('X') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_X VALUES LESS THAN ('Y') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Y VALUES LESS THAN ('Z') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Z VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE) PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0))
NOLOGGING PARALLEL -- FLASHBACK ARCHIVE IOT_Flashback_Data
SQL> table IOT_TABLE created.
2) Create the local secondary bitmap index utilising the underlying mapping table
CREATE BITMAP INDEX IOT_Table_BMI1 ON IOT_Table (numberData)
LOCAL STORAGE (INITIAL 1M PCTINCREASE 0 NEXT 512K) NOLOGGING PARALLEL;
SQL> bitmap index IOT_TABLE_BMI1 created.
3) Quick test to confirm all ok
SQL> INSERT INTO IOT_Table VALUES ('ABC123',100);
SQL> 1 rows inserted.
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOT_Table;
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
ABC123     100
4) Now create a minimal object type to use as the template for object table
CREATE TYPE IOT_type AS OBJECT
textData VARCHAR2(10 CHAR),
numberData NUMBER(10,0)
) FINAL
SQL> TYPE IOT_type compiled
5) Attempt to create an object-based range partitioned IOT, including MAPPING TABLE clause as per step (1)
CREATE TABLE IOTObj_Table OF IOT_type (textData PRIMARY KEY)
OBJECT IDENTIFIER IS PRIMARY KEY ORGANIZATION INDEX
MAPPING TABLE -- we'd like to use this feature to enable use of Bitmap Indexes...
PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire
PARTITION BY RANGE (textData)
(PARTITION Text_Part_A VALUES LESS THAN ('B') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_B VALUES LESS THAN ('C') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_C VALUES LESS THAN ('D') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_D VALUES LESS THAN ('E') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_E VALUES LESS THAN ('F') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_F VALUES LESS THAN ('G') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_G VALUES LESS THAN ('H') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_H VALUES LESS THAN ('I') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_I VALUES LESS THAN ('J') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_J VALUES LESS THAN ('K') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_K VALUES LESS THAN ('L') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_L VALUES LESS THAN ('M') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_M VALUES LESS THAN ('N') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_N VALUES LESS THAN ('O') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_O VALUES LESS THAN ('P') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_P VALUES LESS THAN ('Q') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Q VALUES LESS THAN ('R') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_R VALUES LESS THAN ('S') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_S VALUES LESS THAN ('T') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_T VALUES LESS THAN ('U') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_U VALUES LESS THAN ('V') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_V VALUES LESS THAN ('W') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_W VALUES LESS THAN ('X') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_X VALUES LESS THAN ('Y') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Y VALUES LESS THAN ('Z') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Z VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE) PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0))
NOLOGGING PARALLEL -- FLASHBACK ARCHIVE IOT_Flashback_Data
This errors out with the following...
SQL Error: ORA-25182: feature not currently available for index-organized tables
25182. 00000 - "feature not currently available for index-organized tables"
*Cause:    An attempt was made to use one or more of the following feature(s) not
currently supported for index-organized tables:
CREATE TABLE with LOB/BFILE/VARRAY columns,
partitioning/PARALLEL/CREATE TABLE AS SELECT options,
ALTER TABLE with ADD/MODIFY column options, CREATE INDEX
*Action:   Do not use the disallowed feature(s) in this release.
6) Re-running the create table statement in step 5 without the MAPPING TABLE clause works fine. Not surprisingly an attempt to create a secondary local bitmap index on this table fails as there's no mapping table, like so...
CREATE BITMAP INDEX IOTObj_Table_BMI1 ON IOTObj_Table (numberData)
LOCAL STORAGE (INITIAL 1M PCTINCREASE 0 NEXT 512K) NOLOGGING PARALLEL;
CREATE TABLE with LOB/BFILE/VARRAY columns,
partitioning/PARALLEL/CREATE TABLE AS SELECT options,
ALTER TABLE with ADD/MODIFY column options, CREATE INDEX
*Action:   Do not use the disallowed feature(s) in this release.
CREATE BITMAP INDEX IOTObj_Table_BMI1 ON IOTObj_Table (numberData)
LOCAL STORAGE (INITIAL 1M PCTINCREASE 0 NEXT 512K) NOLOGGING PARALLEL
Error at Command Line:99 Column:13
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00903: invalid table name
00903. 00000 - "invalid table name"
7) Creating a secondary local b-tree index is fine, like so...
SQL> CREATE INDEX IOTObj_Table_I1 ON IOTObj_Table (numberData)
LOCAL STORAGE (INITIAL 1M PCTINCREASE 0 NEXT 512K) NOLOGGING PARALLEL;
index IOTOBJ_TABLE_I1 created.
8) A quick test to ensure object table ok...
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('DEF456',500));
SQL> 1 rows inserted.
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table;
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
DEF456     500

Thanks Dan,
the intention is to range partition based on the initial character, so A* -> Text_Part_A, B* -> Text_Part_B, and so on.
Here's an example, using an empty IOTObj_Table as created previously.
1) Set up & confirm some test data (two 'D's, one 'N', and two 'Z's)
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('DEF456',500));
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('DDD111',510));
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('N3000',515));
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('ZZ1212',520));
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('Z111X',530));
SQL> COMMIT;
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table;
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
DDD111     510
DEF456     500
N3000     515
Z111X     530
ZZ1212     520
2) Just to prove our IOT is enforcing the Primary Key based on the TextData attribute, try to insert a duplicate
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('Z111X',530));
Error starting at line 141 in command:
INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('Z111X',530))
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00001: unique constraint (OCDataSystems.SYS_IOT_TOP_84235) violated
00001. 00000 - "unique constraint (%s.%s) violated"
*Cause:    An UPDATE or INSERT statement attempted to insert a duplicate key.
For Trusted Oracle configured in DBMS MAC mode, you may see
this message if a duplicate entry exists at a different level.
*Action:   Either remove the unique restriction or do not insert the key.
3) Now confirm that our data has been slotted into the range-based partition we expect using the PARTITION clause of SELECT...
- The two 'D's...
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table PARTITION (Text_Part_D);
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
DDD111     510
DEF456     500
- The single 'N'...
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table PARTITION (Text_Part_N);
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
N3000     515
- The two 'Z's...
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table PARTITION (Text_Part_Z);
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
Z111X     530
ZZ1212     520
4) And to wrap up confirm an empty partition
SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table PARTITION (Text_Part_W);

How to pass an IN argument of object type from VB

I need to call a PL/SQL function in Oracle 8.1.6 from VB. One of the IN arguments is an object type (TYPE). How would I instantiate the variable of Oracle object type on VB side so that it can be passed to the Oracle?
Thank you

Hi,
Per the ODP docs,
ODP.NET supports binding parameters of PL/SQL Associative Arrays which contain the following data types.
+■ BINARY_DOUBLE+
+■ BINARY_FLOAT+
+■ CHAR+
+■ DATE+
+■ NCHAR+
+■ NUMBER+
+■ NVARCHAR2+
+■ RAW+
+■ ROWID+
+■ UROWID+
+■ VARCHAR2+
It should work if you create a UDT to hold a varray of mdsys.sdo_geometry, for example.
Hope it helps,
Greg

How to automate the employees info. from R/3 to xRPM for object type P

We need to automate the employees information (new/change) whose object type (P) from R/3 system to xRPM system (CProject component).
We did ALE distribution model with the message type (HRMD_ABA) and able to achieved distribution(R/3 -> xRPM) thru manual step using PFAL transaction. I have no issues on this part.
Now we want to automate the same process to distribution(R/3 -> xRPM) that whenever employees have been created/change in R/3.
By using standard program RBDIDOC which can be achieve by defining background job with message type HRMD_ABA. But it pulls all the object types for the given message type at selection screen. But i am interested only employees with object type P.
There is no much provision existed to restrict only for employees with object type (P).
Systems Release version details:
Source(R/3 system version): SAP R/3 Enterprise
Target(xRPM: SAP ECC 6.0 with HR component: 6.00)
Any help would be appreciated...

Check Tx r3ac5 DNL_COND* objects.
Regards,
Praveen

DB Adapter - Calling Stored Procedure with Object Type

So, we are using JDeveloper 10.1.3.3
We are trying to create an ESB process that invokes a SP with an object type. However, the owner of the package / SP, is NOT the owner of the object type. When going through the DB Adapter wizard, it gives us the following error:
When attempting to use the DB Adapter in JDeveloper to create a partner link to execute a stored procedure. JDeveloper returns the following error:
Unable to import WSDL.
Error while writing wsdl file
Database type is either not supported or is not implemented.
Check to ensure that the type of the parameter is one of the supported datatypes or that there is a collection or user defined type definition representing this type defined in the database.
However, if I create a wrapper package / SP, it works just fine. I'd really like to not be having to create wrapper code for these SPs to work. Is this resolved in 11g? Is there a patch available for 10.1.3.3?
I think this is a JDeveloper Wizard issue, but thought I'd post this here as well.
Thanks,
BradW

This problem can be resolved by granting execute permission on the object type to the caller. For example, if the stored procedure is in schema1 and the object type is in schema2 then you would connect as schema2 and execute
SQL> grant execute on <object type> to schema1
Referencing object types defined in other schemas is documented. This is the described method for accessing object types in other schemas.

SRM 7.0 Advanced Search Object Type

Dear All,
We use SRM 7.0, I want to remove some object types from Advanced Search options in Portal. For example, in standard advanced search, you can select shopping card, confirmation, purchase order, contract... etc. And i dont want some emplyees to see all purchase order or contracts.
How am i going to delete for example purchase order option from advanced search ?
Best regards,

Hi
Advanced search drop down menu is based on SPRO configuration
SRM server -- Cross application basic settings -- POWL and Adv search
Here Standard object types will be defined as SAP entries under define objects types for advanced search.
Also, default application will be assigned for each object types.
If you deleted any of these standard object types, then that object type will not be available in advanced search for any SRM roles. However, that is not advisable to deleted standard objects.
Alternatively, if you want restrict certain group of users to access the some object types, you can control through the configuration powl_queryR which is query visibility at role level.
You can control the the same at user level if you want through powl_queryU
Regards,
Krish

Predefined object type for Purchase order release stratergy

dear experts,
There are already predefined object type for purchase order like bus2012 where i can create new events and methods. I want to know is there any predefined objects for purchase order release strategy. The requirement is there i want to define method, that should display the po release screen. If i bind this method with work flow template, mail should be triggered and if i click the mail po release screen should be opened for respective material...
regards,
Kandhan G

Hello
I'm using the BUS2012 Object type in workflow task but in simulation the task run correct but in the transaction when modify a purchase orden the task send an error...
maybe the error is similar...did you solve this problem?..
Thanks!
Wladimir E.
[email protected]

Restricting the authorization Object for B2B Transactions

Hi All
we are facing the problem in the ISA b2b app, actually the scenario is as below.
we have various transaction types like b2b sales,Peoplesoft order,Request for Order change, RMA ,Request for Quotation(RFQ) and metel order.
As per the requirement, The client wants only a few functionalities for a particular user.
Example:
Transaction Type Authorization
PeopleSoft order View only View only
B2B:Req. OrderCh x x
B2B: Req. RMA
B2B: Req. Quote x x
Metel Order x
For b2b sales transaction a lower level employee would only be able to view the order and he should be restricted to make any changes. Is there a posibility to restrict in this manner? This is Urgent. Please respond immediately. Thanking you in anticipation.
Message was edited by:
Sunil Kumar

>
Viral741 wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have a requirement in SAP Security to restrict the authorization object S_ALV_LAYO to a particular set of users.
>
> Background:
>
> We use composite roles which is shared accross all areas(Finace,marketing,work managment).Now the requirement is for from Work managment to restrict S_ALV_LAYO so that user cant change default layout and can create user specific layout,but other areas are not ready for this.So please let me know if there is any way i can restrict this auth object only for work managment area only.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nitesh
Nitesh,
Remove access to S_ALV_LAYO for general users and give access to F_IT_ALV instead. Keep S_ALV_LAYO for the users who will be maintaining the default layout.
Good Luck!

Workflow with Object Type LFA1

Dear Workflow Gurus,
My business scenario is as follows:
1. User will create the Vendor Master
2. Workflow will be triggered to the Manager so that he can check it (Display only)
Basically, I created a workflow with the following:
Start Event - BO LFA1 CREATED
Task - BO LFA1 DISPLAY
I have tested my workflow at SWDD and SWUE. It is working fine and I get the notification in my SBWP. I can then double click/execute the item in my SBWP Inbox and it will take me to XK03 (Working Perfectly). However, in a real time scenario, when I create a Vendor Master via either FK01, MK01 or XK01, I dont get any notification in my SBWP. Im puzzled as the test at SWDD and SWUE was a success.
Im wondering whether Im using the correct Object Type and Method for my START EVENT - BO LFA1 CREATED. Please take note that everything is Active, has been binded and I have assigned (Import checkbox) LFA1 in my Workflow Container
Please advise.

Hi,
It looks no event is created from FK01, MK01 or XK01.
Please activate the workflow event trace and check the event.
Regards,
Masa

ER: restricting auto binded objects types 11g.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for