ERROR in Invoice posting from XI to SRM in MM-SUS plan driven procurement

Hi
We are implementing MM-SUS plan driven procurement scenario. MM version is 4.7. we are using Z-Program to trigger Invoice i-doc from MM to XI. its reaching XI but from XI to SRM there is some error.
the error is DYNAMIC_CALL_FAILURE
Function call failed; could not find the function BBP_PD_SUSIV_GETLIST Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_DRIVER_SAPXML1; Include: LBBP_BD_DRIVER_SAPXML1U20; Line: 63
any help is appericiated.
Thanks,
Arvind

Hi Arvind,
From Xi to SRM, by the looks of it, you are calling a BAPI. Can you specify how is your scenario configured ?
If it is a BAPI, can you also try to test it(on the SRM box itself) from the Function Module test tool?
Pls let us know the results/details.
cheers
danus

Similar Messages

Error in invoice posting from CRM to ECC

Dear Guru's ,
when we release the billing document from CRM to ECC , system throughs error messages and while we checking the confimation the below green message is appering .
--> Object link not known in CO
Whatever the master data we maintained in the order and confimation is perfect .Kindly advise why this green error is coming???
Regards ,
Pakalapati

solved by my self

SRM 7 PPS Classic Scenario with Plan Driven Procurement?

Hello experts, I want to know if the combination of SRM 7 PPS Classic Scenario with Plan Driven Procurement is possible? or if there any limitation to consider? Our client needs to create purchase requisition in ERP -> send this purchase requisitions to SRM (as shopping carts) create bids - > quotations - > create contract from accepted quotations and then from the contract we need to create purchase order but this one must be created in ERP (classic scenario) Someone has experimented the same situation? Best regards and thanks for your Help.
Liam

Hi Lima ,
Classic scenario wont support PPS .
        - Stand alone and classic scenario not supported
        - Shopping cart renamed to Purchase Requisition
        - Shopping cart generate (pre)commitment in funds management
        - Contract can create Funds Reservation (Earmarked Funds) in Funds Management as a Guarantee
        - Goods Receipt and Invoice created in ERP
        - Mixed PO: PO with lines that works like contract lines, a PO can be created from these lines
        - PO created from contracts or mixed-PO is named call-off PO. Only is a new name, is a "normal" SRM      PO
        - Goods receipt possible in SRM only in "easy" cases
Thanks & Regards
Pradeep Kumar Dondeti

Plan Driven Procurement - Error message "Structure 01 CP 10170237 CP-S-O

Hi SRM Experts,
Iam seeking your help to avoid error messages in the Plan driven procurement scenario.
I have configured Plan driven procurement scenario as described in the ref. material. The objective of this scenario is transferred PR in EB/SRM should create a entry in sourcing cockpit.
Back end (R/3)configuration steps completed:
1. Entries maintained in V_T160EX, V_T160PR
2. RFC communication established using RFC user
3. As soon as PR (Purchase Requisition) is created from Projects, Network the PR is available in EPRTANS table with Procurement profile.
4. Manually executed PR Transfer program BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER
5. Outbound Queue got generated but with below error message.
Error Message: Structure 01 CP 10170237 CP-S-O: No agent found
SRM/EBP Settings maintained:
Direct procurement attribute maintained.
Entry channel created under Company code org. structure
RFC user is assigned to the entry channel.
Assigned Product categories and entries channel to the respective purchase group.
Defined sourcing for product categories.
After maintaining all above configuration, iam still getting error message.
Please provide your expert guidence to complete this scenario setup.
Regards,
Karnati

Hi Nagi,
This is related to Parner determination process with both systems in CRM & ECC.
Error Details: "Partner Function" in CRM is not there in ECC.
We mapped in ECC by creating a ZB copied from "SB" Partner function in ECC & reprocessed the order in CRM, Henceforth rectififed the error.
Many Thanks !!!
Sany.

Plan driven procurement error

hai ,
i have configured plan driven procurement.i maintained tables v_t160pr,v_t160ex and run a report bbp_extreq_transfer.and later i have checked in smq1 where i find a sytem error like
exception condition " partner_not_employee " raised
can anyone please give the solution
thanks and regards
chakradhar

hai jagadish,
thank you very much for ur valuable solution.finally i got it .but i got one error.i had found that particular sc in bbp_pd transaction.but i wanted to see it in purchasers worklist.what are all the attributes i have to assign in the organisation for the particular user to get the sc.
thanks and regards
n.chakradhar

Plan Driven Procurement in SRM 7.0

Hi SRM Friends,
I heard that in SRM 7.0 Plan Driven Procurement, leading PO is always created in Backend system.(Which means It is not supported by Extended classic). I am not sure if this is correct or not.
Please let me know if this is true as per standard out of Box functionality.
Thanks
Venkat

Hello Venkat,
PDP is supported with both the scenarios as mentioned by Masa.
Some key points to consider:
1. Classic scenario: Inventory/ Account assignmnet as Blank, PR if transferred to SRM result in local PO (Direct material purchase behaviour)
2. Extended classic scenario: PO in SRM does not support the service hierachy.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Ashutosh

Invoice posting from SRM system -ECC mandatory fields data need to be fille

Dear Experts,
I am creating an invoice from external system(SAP SRM) and generates an IDOC in SRM and same is sent to ECC. In ECC for creating invoice we have two mandatory fields house bank(hbkid) and section code(secco). These fileds data is not coming from SRM IDOC so i need to pass these fileds data before posting the IDOC.
I am using EXIT_SAPLMRMH_015 for passing these fields data. I tried to debug the exit but it is not stopping.
I written the below code for this but still data is not filling . I request you to give me your suggestions on this.
DATA: S_RBKPV TYPE MRM_RBKPV OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: W_SCACD LIKE LFA1-SCACD.
S_RBKPV = E_RBKPV.
IF E_RBKPV-LIFNR IS NOT INITIAL.
SELECT SINGLE SCACD FROM LFA1 INTO E_RBKPV-SECCO WHERE LIFNR = E_RBKPV-LIFNR.
SELECT SINGLE VBANK FROM ZMM_HOUSEBANK INTO E_RBKPV-HBKID WHERE BUKRS = E_RBKPV-BUKRS
AND GSBER = E_RBKPV-GSBER.
IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
E_CHANGE = 'X'.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
Regards,
Ravi

Identified the EXIT and working on EXit.
Thanks
Ravi

Error in invoice posting in MM-SUS scenario

Dear Experts,
I have configured MM-SUS scenario with SRM5.0, PI7.0 and ECC5.0. The invoice is coming from the SUS system but not getting posted in R/3 because of following error u201CA company code cannot be determined for LS SRM_V1u201D. (SRM_V1 is the vendor)
I have done following invoice settings as mentioned in config guide:
Tcode: OBCA
Partner Type: LS
Partner No.: SR5CLNT300 (SUS client)
Comp. code name in invoice: SRM & Company Ltd.
CoCd: SRM1 (company code maintained in R/3)
Tcode: OBCD
Partner Type Partner No.     Tax Type     Tx
LS        SR5CLNT300     V0     V0
LS        SR5CLNT300     V1     V1
LS        SR5CLNT300     V2     V2
LS        SR5CLNT300     V3     V3
LS        SR5CLNT300     V4     V4
LS        SR5CLNT300     V8     V8
LS        SR5CLNT300     V9     V9
Tcode: OMRY
Partn.Type: LS
Partner no.: SR5CLNT300
Company Code: SRM1
Invoice doc.type: RE
Cred.memo doc.type: RE
Any help in this regards will be appreciated.
Regards,
Ashish

The invoice was successfully posted. I have done 2 thing:
1) I got implemented User Exit: EXIT_SAPLMRMH_011 in Enhancement: MRMH0002
2) Maintained Transaction VS5 and G/L account no. for relevent chart of accounts in R/3 table T030K.

"Error at invoice posting"

Hi all,
i am getting an error while posting invoice to G/L accounts saying " Only output tax allowed for account 175000, VN is not allowed"
i also tried to deactivate tax code VN. but the error still presist.
where should i make the settings.
Thanks in advance
KV

Dear KV
It seems from your comments
"Only output tax allowed",
the tax code VN assigned is input tax which your MM people will be using. From SD point of view, you should assign output tax and hence, go to VK12 / UTXJ, select the appropriate combination and change the VN tax code to any other output tax code.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Number Range Error in Invoice posting in FI.

Dear friends,
I have copied F2 and created another Billing Document Type. A seperate number range series has also been maintained and has been defined in the newly created Billing document type.
At the time of saving and posting the Invoice with the newly created number range, system is throwing an error and disallowing the document to get posted, till the time the number range is not maintained in the series specified, from "9000000000 to 9999999999".
Once I am changing the number series in the billing document and maintaining the standard, system is allowing the document to get posted.
Can anybody help me with a solution, where I can use my newly created number series in any newly created billing document type.
Rgds,
Indrajit

Hi indrajit,
There is standard setting in accounting document number range so that the accounting document number is same as you billing document number.
Check you accounting document type .
Goto transaction FBKP and see the number range assigned to the accounting document type.
Goto SNRO and give objed RF_BELEG and the series maintaines for the accountion type, if external tick is on the the systems assigns same number.
for this to happen your billing document number range should fall within the range specified for accounting document.
Regards
Rasik Waghela

MIRO error during invoice posting

Hi,
when I post an invoice document with MIRO, the system prompts with the following error:
Account type K is not defined for document type RE
Message no. F5243
How can I post the invoice ?
Best regards

hi,
GO to OBA7 ....select the document type and select detail and select customer check box under account type allowed data.......
Hope it helps...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Errors while replicating Materials from ECC to SRM

Hi All,
I am trying to replicate materials from R/3 to SRM, in SMQ2 of SRM, the status of MATERIAL is still in yellow colour. when i checked in SMW01 tcode, the error is "Category for material group 013 does not exist" where as in R/3 also we dont have any material group as 013.
All the Prod type & Prod category have been replicated into SRM from R/3.
And no materials have copied in SRM.
how to resolve this ?
regds,
CB
Edited by: Channabasappa.K on Feb 17, 2011 10:30 AM

Hi,
DNL_CUST_PROD0 & DNL_CUST_PROD1 were in green colour now,
DNL_CUST_BASIS3 is in yellow colour & i saw in some doc that DNL_CUST_BASIS3 is not reqd from SRM7.0 onwards.
when i try to replicate MATERIAL, in SMQ2 i am getting status as SYSFAIL & after double clicking on that i got a pop up as "Error in Mapping (Details: transaction SMW01)"
Upon checking in SMW01 i got the above errors as
" Category for material group 013 does not exist
Message no. COM_PRODUCT_API002
Diagnosis
If material groups are used in the SAP system, they must exist as categories in CRM/EBP before you import materials. When Customizing object DNL_CUST_PROD1 is imported, the material groups are imported automatically and created in the category hierarchy R3MATCLASS (material group).
Procedure
Check whether the material groups have been imported successfully and exist as categories.
Proceed
If necessary, import the Customizing object DNL_CUST_PROD1"
Like this its showing 19 material groups and all these 19 mat groups were not present in ECC.
Regds,
CB

Error in replicating data from r3 to SRM

hi,
my entries in database table comm_product(SRM) was deleted by mistake,now when i run T-code r3as, i get the error 'Hierarchy for R/3 material types does not exist', please help.
regards,
johny.

Hi,
Using com_hierarchy check whether hierarchies are present are not. Start down load of customizing objects first and then business objects. In R3AS select DNL_CUST_BASIS3,DNL_CUST_PROD0, DNL_CUST_PROD1, then MATEIRAL and start down load again.
Rgds,
RRK

Plan driven procurement - P.O created with existing number in SRM

We are into SRM 7.0 with ECC 6.0 as backend.   Scenario is classic
We are testing PDP process, the business scenario starts with "Reservation" in R3---PR
is then generated via MRP in MM ->Transferred to SRM---> SC created through PDP
channel in SRM (ex req.request EXTR) ---> Request goes through bidding process (RFx
and RFx response) ---> Awarded RFx response creates PO in SRM .
I understand that this is OK coz, SRM creates Local P.Os even in classic scenario.
PROBLEM Description
My problem is that the P.O number of this Local P.O(created in the above steps) takes a
number that already exists in the backend and therefore this new P.O gets created in
SRM, but fails to go to backend. How can I have a different number/number range for
PDP P.Os which does not clash with regular Backend P.Os
Classic scenario:
================
a) at SRM side:
- Assigned the transaction type u201CECu201D (= the R/3 PO document type) to the attribute
DP_PROC_TY
- Attribute BSA = EC
- Define No ranges for SC and follow on documents u2013 u201CPOu201D is defined as Internal number
range (3000000000 to 3009999999)
- Define No range per Backend system (No range for P.Os = PO)
- Define No range for local PO (Number Range PO = 3000000000 to 3009999999 as
internal number range)
- Assigned the local/backend PO number range(Number range PO) as a internal number
range to the transaction type u201CECu201D u2013 against BUS2201
b) at R/3 side:
- Enter the Number Range PO(corresponding to the SRM number range PO) and
flag it as an external number range (trx. OMH6 Number Range for
Purchasing Documents). Values 3000000000 to 3009999999 (External)
- Maintain the document type u201CECu201D corresponding to the SRM transaction type u201CECu201D
and assign the R/3 number range for POs as "NoRge Ext" (field
V_T161-NUMKE) (trx. Document type within Purchase Order Customizing). Number
Range here is also u201CPOu201D to match SRM
My questions are:
1) Is it necessary to have u201CPOu201D as number range under u201CDefine number range for
Local P.Osu201D since this is a classic scenario
2) Is the current number being picked up from here(number range for local P.Os) for
creating PDP purchase orders(which are basically local P.Os). Can I have a
different number range here from what I have maintained in u201CDefine No range per
Backend systemu201D
3) What is the way to use u201CECDPu201D as an additional document type? Can it have a
different number range other than u201CPOu201D that I have set now?
4) Where did I go wrong?

Bharadwaj,
Thanks for that promt response
Your point#1
1. Number range you defined for PO in "Define Num range per Backend System for Follow-on doc".
e.g :
backend PO - 10000 29999
local PO - 30000 49999
> I can only have one PO range per backend system and I have only one backend system and I have already maintained the backend PO number range here... How can I maintain the local P.O number range in "Define Num range per Backend system"?
Your pont#2
2.Make sure above number range is maintained in "Define Num range per Shopping Cart and Follow-on doc" and it should be Internal num range.
SRM IMG ->Supplier Relationship Management->SRM Server->Cross-Application Basic Settings->Number Ranges->SRM Server Number Ranges->Define Number Ranges per Backend System for Follow-on Documents
number range of POs .
Po number range for local and backend PO should be diff since if it is ordered as a direct , local PO will be created in SRM rather than in R/3 system. this PO document type also must be mapped in r/3.
> Can you please provide the proper path ? Define Number Ranges per Backend System for Follow-on Documents
---number range of POs .
I do understand that I need to have two number ranges.. How do I achieve this? Can you please explain this?
Saji George
Edited by: Saji George on Nov 17, 2010 8:21 AM
Edited by: Saji George on Nov 17, 2010 8:22 AM

Baseline date not getting populated from SRM invoices posted to ECC 6.0

Hi,
We are currently in ECC 6.0. The SRM system is in 4.0. We have this particular problem that the baseline date is not getting populated from the Invoices posted from the SRM. The baseline date is blank and the document is saved.
Did anyone face the same problem??? Can you please refer SAP note 541934 and expand........
Thanks
Aravind
Edited by: Aitipamula Aravind on Aug 10, 2009 5:13 AM

Hello,
Yes, you could check the attached note 541934 and regard the implementation of the field ZFBDT in the invoicing document.
Note 541934 provides a solution how to achieve the MM-customizing for payment baseline dates getting effective for invoices with SRM-origin. This note needs to be applied at your ERP-MM-side in the former plug-in-layer. As described in the note, this is a modification. It's recommended to apply in non-productive system first.
Hope the above infor.are helps for you!
Best Regards,
Gladys xing

ERROR in Invoice posting from XI to SRM in MM-SUS plan driven procurement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for