Error in local variable

1 am writing this query in oracle 11g in which i have declared a local variable v_SETRESULT which will
store maximum +1 value of VISIT_ID which is my column in table VISIT and this column
data type is integer
my query
declare
v_SETRESULT NUMBER;-----------this is declaration of local variable
begin
SELECT Coalesce(Max(VISIT_ID), 0)+1
INTO v_SETRESULT
FROM Visit--------this is my name of table;
dbms_output.put_line(v_SETRESULT);
end;
when i run this gives me this error
anonymous block completed
what does it mean

yes iam doing this SQL Developer iam new to oracle 11g but i have previously worked in SQL Server 2005
and if you run this query in SQL Server 2005 i get my result printed
my query of SQL Server 2005
Declare @v_SETRESULT as int
begin
SELECT @v_SETRESULT=Coalesce(Max(VISIT_ID), 0)+1
FROM Visit;
--dbms_output.put_line(v_SETRESULT);
print @v_SETRESULT
end;
but when i run that above query which i posted previously this gives me this message
rather than printing the result
anonymous block completed
then how to see my result printed

Similar Messages

Error in Local Variable Creation in BPEL

Hi,
In BPEL, we can easyly create[b] local variable of simple type.
But i want to create complex type variables that can be used for my internal purpose.
But it is giving error , if i try to do so.
Could you please give me some inputs of how to create a[b] complex type local variable in BPEL process.
Thanks in advance

define a complex type in the process XSD ..
then, make the local variable ..

How to solve error using local variables?

I've created a sequence with a local variable.
But when I execute it, an error occurs since the first step (before the step where I manipulate the local variable).
The error code is something like:
Error in Evaluation. Syntax expression. Column [0-0]
It's interesting because it seems that once I've executed my sequence for the first time I can't create any other sequence where this error doesn't appear.

Pparo,
The problem does not occur under TS 1.0.3 on my system. However, I think we can get to the bottom of this.
When at a breakpoint in your sequence, if I type the expression "Locals.nls == 15-" in the TestStand watch window, I will get the message
Evaluation Failed: Syntax error in expression (Column 18-18)
I believe that this is the same type of error that you have encountered. Correct me if I am wrong.
The numbers after the word "Column" indicate where the error has occurred in the expression. In your case the error occurs at the beginning of an expression. The question still remains as to in which expression is error occurring.
Are you seeing this error reported in the watch window? If so, then you have typed the expression in the watch window.
If I copy the bad expression above into a the expression of a Statement step I get a run-time error of
An error occurred in the 'Statement' step of the 'MainSequence' sequence in 'Sequence File1'.
The post-expression for the step 'Statement' could not be evaluated.
Syntax error in expression.
Error Code: -17322
From what you report, the error appears to be located in your watch expression. When I executed your sequence with a breakpoint on the first step, I added the watch expression by selected the Context tab, expanding the Sequence Context tree view until I could see the nls variable, and then I dragged nls from the tree view to the watch window. This created the watch expression of Locals.nls. I also created the same watch expression by right clicking in the watch window, selecting Add Watch from the context menu, and selecting (or typing) Locals.nls. The expressions all evaluated to 24 without error.
This process has NOTHING to do with creating local variables. You asked if you are creating variables properly. There are only 2 ways to create variables in TestStand 1.0.3, neither of which you have described. The most common method is to select the Locals tab after opening your sequence (not during execution), right click in the right pane and add the variable of your choice. It seems like you did this correctly based on the sequence file you sent. The other method of creating variables is to do so programmatically. However, this is beyond the scope of this answer.
You ask a question about "the best way to create three constants in LabVIEW and pass them to a LabVIEW VI that is a step?" This implies to me that you want to create the strings within a VI called by one sequence step, and then use them in another VI called by a different sequence step. I would recommend taking a look at the example AccessingPropertiesAndVariables.seq that ships with TestStand. The first 3 VIs write values back to step properties, but could just as easily write them back to local variables. The 4th VI writes a file reference back to a TS local variable. The 5th and 6th step get the file reference from the TS local variable. You want to do something similar to the 4th and 5th VI, however, you want to send 3 strings to local TS variables, and then get them in the following VI. This will require using "TestStand - Set Property Value (String).vi" and "TestStand - Get Property Value (String).vi" which can be found in the TestStand function palette in LabVIEW. After reviewing this example you can then ask additional question. I recommend posting the question on a different thread since it is unrelated to your original question about the syntax error.

Error in assigning value to local variable

i am writing a stored procedure in which i have pass parameter if parameter value is zero then i assign a previously declared variable null else that value
syntax is this
create or replace
PROCEDURE usp_Add_Update_Insurance
p_CityID IN NUMBER DEFAULT NULL
as
v_CityID number(10,0);
begin
IF p_CityID = 0 THEN
BEGIN
v_CityID := NULL;-----giving error in this line
else
v_CityID:=p_CityID;
END;
END IF;
end
begin
///some query
end
please help someone

I think there is no added value by putting those Begin/End.
The simplest solution is just remove them
Create Or Replace
Procedure Usp_Add_Update_Insurance (
     P_Cityid In Number Default Null
) As
     V_Cityid Number(10,0);
Begin
     If P_Cityid = 0 Then
          V_Cityid := Null;
     Else
          V_Cityid:=P_Cityid;
     End If;
     -- do something with V_Cityid
End; The only reason for having Begin/End is if you want to catch some exceptions or perform some strange local variable declarations. But it does not seems to be case here.
MJ

While local variable initialized inside try block compiler throws error???

Check out this code where two local variables(one String and the other int type) is declared at the beginning of the method and initialized inside try block. now when i compile this app, it gives an error sayin' that Variables not been initialized. Can anyone tell me why compiler is throwin' an error message?
Many thanks.
import java.io.*;
public class Test{
public static void main(String[] args){
String aa;
int c;
BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
System.out.println("EnterAnything:");
try{
aa = in.readLine();
c = 1;
catch(IOException e){
System.out.println(e.getMessage());
System.out.println(aa);
System.out.println(c);
}

jfbriere,
Thanks to u all.
that every reference to the variable is necessarily preceded
by execution of an assignment
to the variable.But I've initialized the variable c and aa inside try block before referencing it as a parameter of println()?
Can u clarify this?
--DM

Default initialisation of member variables and local variables

I don't understand why member variables are initialized with default values by Java.
Objects are initialized with "null" and primitives with "0", except boolean, which is initialized with "false".
If these variables are used locally they are not initialized. The compiler requires them to be initialized by the programer, for example "String s = null".
Why? What is the use of that difference?
And why are arrays always initialized with default values, no matter if they are member variables or local variables? For example String[] s = new String[10]; s[0] to s[9] are initialized with "null", no matter if "s" is a local or member variable.
Can someone please explain that strange difference, why it is used? To me it has no sense.

Most of the time I have to initialize a local variable
with "String s = null" in order to use it because
otherwise the compile would complain. This is a cheap
little trick, but I think everyone uses it.
I wouldn't agree with "most of the time". The only cases where it is almost necessary to do that is when the variable should be initialized in a loop or a try-catch statement, and that doesn't happen too often.
If local variables were initiliazed automatically without a warning it would be a Bad Thing: the compiler could tell when there is a possibility that a variable hasn't been assigned to and prevent manymanymany NullPointerExceptions on run time.
And you didn't answer me why this principle is not
used with arrays if it is so useful as you think.
Possibly it is much more difficult to analyse the situation in the case of arrays; what if values are assigned to the elements in an order that depends on run time properties such as values returned from a random number generator.
The more special rules one has to remember, the more
likely one makes errors.I agree, but what is the rule to remember in this case?

How to assign bean value to a local variable in JSP using struts.

Hi everybody!
I've a problem that puzzled me on how to assign a bean value to a local variable like String in JSP using struts.
we can have someting like this to display the value
<bean:write name="detailService" property="status" />or
<bean:define id="theStatus" name="detailService" property="status"/>
This is country: <%=theStatus%>but an error occured when I tried like this:
String currentStatus = "<bean:define id="theStatus" name="detailService" property="status"/>";
or
String currentStatus = "<bean:write name="detailService" property="status" />";Is there a way to do this?.....
Any help pretty much appreciated

Java != JSP.
The <bean:define> and <bean:write> tags are custom tags meant to appear in the HTML section of a JSP file, as opposed to the scriptlet section. They actually get turned into java code as part of the translation process.
The <bean:write> tag naturally just writes out what you tell it to.
The <bean:define> tag defines a local variable, and gives it a value.
this should do it.
<bean:define id="theStatus" name="detailService" property="status" type="java.lang.String"/>
<%
String currentStatus = theStatus;
%>With the advent of JSTL, you shouldn't really need to use scriptlet code anymore. Personally I am for 0% scriptlet code in any jsp I write.

A null object loaded from local variable 'o' in XSLT mapping

Hi experts,
We are facing an issue in XSLT mapping for one of the inbound scenario.
While executing the source message at mapping level, it is failing with the error text - "javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sap.engine.lib.xsl.xpath.XPathException: Error parsing query -> java.lang.NullPointerException: while trying to invoke the method java.lang.Object.toString() of a null object loaded from local variable 'o'
Kindly help us on this issue!
FYI - We are facing this issue in PO 7.4 version.
Best Regards,
Uday.

HI Hareesh,
Thanks for your inputs...
We are migrating the interface from PI7.1 to PI 7.4 at this one we are getting the error as mentioned the earlier. we are uanle to run it in the mapping level as well.
Why are we getting the error?As this is working in PI7.1 version
Please help us on this.

RE: local variable cross-talk?

Jeff
A global can be considered as a variable to the entire code, where lots of
different vi's can operate it. Locals only have any meaning within their
own vi, or instances of their own vi.
If anything writes to a particular global, whether in reenterent vi's or
not, it's available everywhere in the code.
What you were asking was about locals though. If a vi is non-renentrant
(i.e. as they come out of the box) then the values in the locals are vi
specific, no matter where the vi is, where it was last used, it retains the
data from it's last operation. If it is re-entrant, then the values in the
locals for each occurance of the vi are its own for EACH instance, i.e. just
like different locals in different vi's, it doesn't matter where else the vi
is used, the data held is that from the last operation of that specific
instance.
Simple way to demonstrate this. Make a vi that has one numeric control,
then code in +1 and get it to write to a local variable for that control.
Throw in an indicator to wire out the result of what is written to the local
for the control.
Then take this vi, put it in a for loop, then put another copy in the for
loop as well. Wire the indicators to the side of the for loop and create
indicator arrays for them. Get the loop to run 6 times say. Now try
running this with the vi in the for loop non-reentrant and then reenterrant.
One way the arrays will contain either all the odd no.s 1,3,5,7,9,11 and
then the other array 2,4,6,8,10,12 (don't know which array will be which,
depends which executes first in the for loop of this example). The other
way they will both be 1,2,3,4,5,6. In the first example, the same vi has
run 12 times, i.e. one copy of the vi which retains its info and is called
in many places and therefore only has one set of values, and the other with
two re-enterant copies where they have their information specific to that
instance of them i.e. effectively they are different vi's. Both ways are
useful, depends what you want.
If you're looking for a use for non-reenterant vi's then consider this:-
For instance. Supposing you get many things to try to write to a global
array of numbers, and you have two vi's one "A" writes to the first element
in the array and the other "B" writes to the second element. Because in LV
you have to read a global first and then write to it to perform a change,
these independant vi's "A" and "B" (be they re-enterant versions of the same
vi, or different vi's), can be performing the tasks simultaneously in the
code. I.e. "A" reads, "B" reads, "A" writes, and "B" writes over the top
with a modified version of what it read, and "A"'s changes are lost. This
is what's known as a "race condition" as "A" hadn't finished and "B" needed
to know what "A" was going to write before "B" performed "A" read. Try it,
hours of fun if you code this kind of thing in inadvertantly!
If the same vi is used, and is not re enterant, it can only run in one
instance at a time, hence two read / write operations cannot be performed
together, problem solved. Unless that gives you timing issues of course,
waiting for one to finish, to write the other......but that's another whole
can of worms.
cheers
Tim Price
This e-mail, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended
solely for the addressee(s) and are confidential and may be legally
privileged. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express
prior written permission of the sender. If you have received this e-mail in
error you may not copy, disclose to any third party or use the contents,
attachments or information in any way.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey W Percival
Sent: 29 November 2001 21:12
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: local variable cross-talk?
Another useful reply! What a great news group this is.
One last thing I wanted to ask about, though, is global vs. local. I see
you talk about globals, but in fact the variables in my subVI's were locals.
I can easily understand the behavior I observed accompanying the use of
global variables, But I guess the use of the word "local" stumped me.
Should I interpret "local" in LabVIEW's sense to mean "local to all
instances of this VI"? And global to mean "visible to all instances of this
VI as well as other VI's"?
-Jeff
Tim Price wrote:
This facility is actually very useful, for instances where you want to
encapsulate some code so that it can only run in one place at a time,
i.e.
global arrays that are written to in more than one place. This method
can
eradicate race conditions completely for example when used like this.
There
are multiple other uses as well.
However, using a vi as a module of code, to run in more than one
instance at
a time simultaneously, re-entrant is the way to go. Just make sure you
debug it first!!!
Remember though, just because a vi may be re-eneterant, doesn't mean
that
everything inside is; sub-vi's, Globals etc. The classic one I've seen
is
where people think that a re-enterant vi is talking to it's own copy of
any
Globals used within it, i.e. counters etc., where in actual fact of
course,
they are all using the same Globals.
Worth playing with a few examples to get familiar with it.
Tim Price
Jeffrey W Percival, Senior Scientist and Associate Director
Space Astronomy Laboratory, University of Wisconsin - Madison
1150 University Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USA
608-262-8686 (fax 608-263-0361) [email protected]
http://www.sal.wisc.edu/~jwp

Tim Price wrote:
Tim, thanks very much. I'll try the experiment you suggest.
Thanks for taking the time.
-Jeff
Jeffrey W Percival, Senior Scientist and Associate Director
Space Astronomy Laboratory, University of Wisconsin - Madison
1150 University Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USA
608-262-8686 (fax 608-263-0361) [email protected] http://www.sal.wisc.edu/~jwp

While trying to invoke the method java.lang.String.length() of an object loaded from local variable 'payload'

Hi,
Our PI is getting data from WebSphere MQ and pushing to SAP. So our sender CC is JMS and receiver is Proxy. Our PI version is 7.31.
Our connectivity between the MQ is success but getting the following error while trying to read the payload.
Text: TxManagerFilter received an error:
[EXCEPTION]
java.lang.NullPointerException: while trying to invoke the method java.lang.String.length() of an object loaded from local variable 'payload'
       at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.ConvertJmsMessageToBinaryFilter.filter(ConvertJmsMessageToBinaryFilter.java:73)
       at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.MessageFilterContextImpl.callNext(MessageFilterContextImpl.java:204)
       at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.InboundDuplicateCheckFilter.filter(InboundDuplicateCheckFilter.java:348)
       at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.MessageFilterContextImpl.callNext(MessageFilterContextImpl.java:204)
I have searched SDN but couldn't fix it. Please provide your suggestion.
With Regards
Amarnath M

Hi Amarnath,
Where exactly you are getting this error?
If you are getting at JMS Sender communication channel, try to stop and start the JMS communication channel and see the status, also use XPI Inspector to get the exact error log.
for reference follow below blogs:
Michal's PI tips: ActiveMQ - JMS - topics with SAP PI 7.3
Michal's PI tips: XPI inspector - help OSS and yourself
XPI Inspector

Approval task SP09: Evaluation of approvalid failed with Exception: while trying to invoke the method java.lang.String.length() of an object loaded from local variable 'aValue'

Hi everyone,
I just installed SP09 and i was testing the solution. And I found a problem with the approvals tasks.
I configured a simple ROLE approval task for validate add event. And when the runtime executes the task, the dispatcher log shows a error:
ERROR: Evaluation of approvalid failed with Exception: while trying to invoke the method java.lang.String.length() of an object loaded from local variable 'aValue'
And the notifications configured on approval task does not start either.
The approval goes to the ToDO tab of the approver, but when approved, also the ROLE stays in "Pending" State.
I downgraded the Runtime components to SP08 to test, and the approvals tasks works correctly.
Has anyone passed trough this situation in SP09?
I think there is an issue with the runtime components delivered with this initial package of SP09.
Suggestions?

Hi Kelvin,2016081
The issue is caused by a program error in the Dispatcher component. A fix will be provided in Identity Management SP9 Patch 2 for the Runtime component. I expect the patch will be delivered within a week or two.
For more info about the issue and the patch please refer to SAPNote 2016081.
@Michael Penn - I might be able to assist if you provide the ticket number
Cheers,
Kristiyan
IdM Development

How to declare local variables in PL/SQL stored programs

Where do I declare local variables in a PL/SQL stored program?
I get compiler errors with either of the options below:
FUNCTION GET_PRINCIPAL_BALANCE (CUT_OFF_DATE IN DATE, TITLE_SN IN DATE, TOTAL_BALANCE OUT NUMBER) RETURN NUMBER IS
TOTAL_BALANCE NUMBER;
BEGIN
RETURN TOTAL_BALANCE;
END;
FUNCTION GET_PRINCIPAL_BALANCE (CUT_OFF_DATE IN DATE, TITLE_SN IN DATE, TOTAL_BALANCE OUT NUMBER) RETURN NUMBER IS
BEGIN
TOTAL_BALANCE NUMBER;
RETURN TOTAL_BALANCE;
END;

Your local variable cannot have the same name as the formal out parameter. This is a procedure example, but since functions should not have out parameters anyway ...
session2> CREATE PROCEDURE p (p_id IN NUMBER, p_did OUT NUMBER) AS
2     p_did NUMBER;
3 BEGIN
4     p_did := p_id * 2;
5 END;
6 /
Warning: Procedure created with compilation errors.
session2> show error
Errors for PROCEDURE P:
LINE/COL ERROR
0/0      PL/SQL: Compilation unit analysis terminated
1/1      PLS-00410: duplicate fields in RECORD,TABLE or argument list are
         not permittedThe proper way to create a function would be something like:
CREATE FUNCTION f (p_id IN NUMBER) RETURN NUMBER AS
   l_did NUMBER;
BEGIN
l_did := p_id * 2;
RETURN l_did;
END;You should really assign a value to the variable before you return it.
John

Issue with local variable in forms personalization

Hi All,
I did the following things at last it is give me syntax error, please help me on this.
Rules section:
seq Description Level Enabled
1 Populate Number Function y
Conditions:
T.E : When new item instance
T.O : REQ_LINES.REQUISIOTN_NUMBER
Condition::REQ_LINES.BLANKET_PO_NUM_DSP IS NOT NULL AND
:REQ_LINES.SELECT_LINE='Y'
Processing mode: Not in enter query mode
Actions:
seq: Type: Desc: Langauge: Enabled
1: property: local variable :Y
Object Type: Local Varibale
Target Object: XXNUM
property : Value
Text: = TO_CHAR(${item.req_lines.blanket_po_num_dsp.value})
Rules section:
seq Description Level Enabled
1 Default Number Function y
Conditions:
T.E : When block instance
T.O : New_DOCUMENT
Condition:
Processing mode: Not in enter query mode
Actions:
seq: Type: Desc: Langauge: Enabled
1: property: use of local variable :Y
Object Type:ITEM
Target Object:NEW_DOCUMENT.DOCUMENT_NUMBER
property : Value
*Text: = SELECT TO_CHAR (${var.XXNUM.value}) from dual*
The line which i bold shows me an syntax error, please check the syntax and if it is wrong please correct it.
Thanks and Regards
Zaheer
Edited by: zaheer on Feb 10, 2010 11:25 PM
Edited by: zaheer on Feb 10, 2010 11:25 PM

Hi Zaheer,
Try using this:
Actions:
seq: Type: Desc: Langauge: Enabled
1: property: use of local variable :Y
Object Type:ITEM
Target Object:NEW_DOCUMENT.DOCUMENT_NUMBER
property : Value
Text: = ${var.XXNUM.value}
PS: You might get a message while validating, but you can ignore that.
Regards,
Sujoy

Local variable problem

I am making an application that takes an apartment number and number of occupants in that apartment and then displays a number of statistics. So far I haven't had much problem
except on a what is probably a very simple problem.
I have two buttons, and when "store" is clicked the info in the textboxes is input to an array.
My problem is with the next button, "quit", this is where all the info is supposed to be displayed.
All my variables that I need from "store" are local and are recognized in " the if statement in quit. Ive tried declaring them outside of the if statement, but it hasn't been working.
{code}
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent event)
               Object source = event.getSource();
               Apartment input;
               if (source == store)
                    Integer aptNo = Integer.parseInt(input1.getText());
                    Integer occup = Integer.parseInt(input2.getText());
                    input = new Apartment(aptNo, occup);
                    if(aptNo > BUILDING_SIZE)
                         JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, "That apartment number doesn't exist.");
                    else if(occup > MAX_OCCUPANTS)
                         JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, "Too many occupants, only 20 are permitted per apartment.");
                    else
                         occupants[aptNo] = occup;
                         input1.setText("");
                         input2.setText("");
                         JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, input.getNumber(occupants));
               if (source == quit)
               // I need the variables aptNo and occup in here to put into my methods for output, but I don't know how to get them.
{code}

EmmCeeVee wrote:
Thank you for all of the responses, it really helps me out.
Obviously my knowledge of local variables is hurting as I switched it around as your said and declared the aptNo and occup outside of the if's.
All I need is for the quit button to look at the array ( which has just been modified by the sotre button) and output a bunch of results.
Heres where im at:Your problem is of scope of the variables.
Here whatever variable you defined in actionPerformed they are local for that method (they are out of scope when the method is finished/called again), Upon this, the actionPerformed is called twice one for store and another time for quit. So you cant expect the value stored at store should be there still when you all quit
If you want those values available on both the actions then make them a class level variables.
Below is a sample program, might help you.
class Employee
     String empName = null;
     int empNo;
     Employee(String eName,int eNmbr)
          this.empName = eName;
          this.empNo = eNmbr;
class CheckVariableScope
        Employee empOb; // Here
     int eNo;
     String eName = null;
     public void checkScope(String action)
                //Instead of defining Employee reference variable, eNo and eName in checkScope method, define it @ class level.
                // in your case they are Apartment input, Integer aptNo and Integer occup
                 // like above i did.
                 // If i comment the class level variable and uncomment method variable, this program also give the same error.
          //Employee empOb;
          //int eNo;
          //String eName = null;
          if (action.equals("Store") )
                    eNo = 10;
                    eName = "Bob";
                    empOb = new Employee(eName, eNo);
                    System.out.println("The eName is : "+empOb.empName+" , empNo is : "+empOb.empNo);
               if (action.equals("quit"))
                    System.out.println(" eNO from Object is : "+empOb.empNo);
                    System.out.println(eNo); //Error: may not have been intitialized
     public static void main (String st[])
          CheckVariableScope ob = new CheckVariableScope();
          ob.checkScope("Store");
          ob.checkScope("quit");
}

GetDescriptions() of an object loaded from local variable 'itemDeploymentResult'

Hi
We are urgrading our SAP MII ( purely Java ) systems from 7.31 Sp5 to 7.40 and we got stuck at Configuration phase. We are getting the following error during Queue validation.
Checking of deployment queue completed with error. java.lang.NullPointerException: while trying to invoke the method com.sap.sdt.j2ee.tools.deploymentmgr.DeploymentManagerItemResultIF.getDescriptions() of an object loaded from local
variable 'itemDeploymentResult'.
I looked in the trace files under SUM/sdt/trc directory and found the following information.
Jul 3, 2014 9:52:16 AM
[Error]:
com.sap.sdt.executor.module.ModuleExecutor [Thread[UC-3,5,main]]: A
problem has occurred:
com.sap.sdt.executor.exception.StepExecutionException: Problem while
trying to execute operation on service validate-queue. The following
problem has occurred java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException. CSN
Component BC-UPG-TLS-TLJ.
Checking of deployment queue completed with error.
java.lang.NullPointerException: while trying to invoke the method
com.sap.sdt.j2ee.tools.deploymentmgr.DeploymentManagerItemResultIF.getDescriptions() of an object loaded from local
variable 'itemDeploymentResult'
Jul 3, 2014 9:52:16 AM
[Error]:
com.sap.sdt.executor.module.ModuleExecutor [Thread[UC-3,5,main]]:
Checking of deployment queue completed with error.
Jul 3, 2014 9:52:16 AM
[Error]:
com.sap.sdt.executor.module.ModuleExecutor [Thread[UC-3,5,main]]:
java.lang.NullPointerException: while trying to invoke the method
com.sap.sdt.j2ee.tools.deploymentmgr.DeploymentManagerItemResultIF.getDescriptions() of an object loaded from local
variable 'itemDeploymentResult'
We have 26 GB left on our Drive and have also upgraded JSPM to 7.31 Sp8. We are using SUM10SP05_9.
Appreciate your quick help

Hi Amarnath,
Where exactly you are getting this error?
If you are getting at JMS Sender communication channel, try to stop and start the JMS communication channel and see the status, also use XPI Inspector to get the exact error log.
for reference follow below blogs:
Michal's PI tips: ActiveMQ - JMS - topics with SAP PI 7.3
Michal's PI tips: XPI inspector - help OSS and yourself
XPI Inspector

Error in local variable

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for