Error In MIRO FI-MM integration

Hi Gurus,
Now i am doing CIN settigns in my project and tax procedure is TAXINN.
I done all the configuration steps related to CIN. While doing MIRO, I got errors related to GL acounts. Even GL reconciliation account also not picking here. I maintained Recon account in vender master data.
In PO i gave the vendor details.
Can u pls help me to sort out of this issue.
Is there any settings for vendor Reconciliation account.
IN FS00 settings are
Balance sheet current liability account, vendor recon a/c, line item disply, 012 and G067.
Is there any settings necessary to this account.
And even some tax accoutns are also not picking properly.
Pls give me some inputs.
Regards
Gamidii

Hi Vishnu,
In F-43 and FB60 entries are posted properly with out tax code. when i put the mark for calculte tax then i got the error like Tax code is not created under the jurisdiction.
But that code created under same jurisdiction in FTXP.
For Jipal, you are trying tell FS00 settigns for which GL?
I checked GL Codes balances after f-43 and f-53, now its correct.
But when i am trying to do the transaction with tax code, at that time only i am geting the problem.
Pls help me out.
For Ravi sankar, i didn't look at any sap notes.
Regards,
Gamidii

Similar Messages

Tax error in MIRO

Hi,
I am getting tax error in MIRO while posting transaction. "tax amount must not be greater than the tax base" msg FF747.
Invoice amount is 168.91(MIRO)
PO amount is 55.17
Tax amount is 113.74
This error is coming due to Tax amount(113.74) is greater than PO (55.17) amount.
tax amount is greater than due to heavy import duty. User wants to post greater tax amount than actual PO amount, could you please suggest how can it be possible to post in SAP, i am trying to post but i am getting above error.
This error is coming due to Tax amount(113.74) is greater than PO (55.17) amount.
Thanks,
Sam.

Hi Sam,
I too have the same kind of scenario. The VAT value is more than the base amount. Please inform me the solution applied by you.
Thanks in advance,
Pravin.

Error while installation of Outlook Integration Add On

Hi Experts,
Problem encountered upon installation of outlook add-on
The message box shows "The Procedure point ??OCBFDbDef@@QAE@....... could not be located in dynamic link library BFFramework.dll".
I'm watching this thread . I cannot open the link for the proposed solution to my problem.
[Error while installation of Outlook Integration Add On]
Please provide updated link
Regards,
Sandra
Edited by: Sandra Callanta on Sep 15, 2009 10:55 AM
Edited by: Sandra Callanta on Sep 15, 2009 10:56 AM

Hi Sandra,
You may check SAP Note Number: 953357 instead. The title for the note is: Troubleshooting Add-ons in Business One.
Thanks,
Gordon

Error in MIRO transaction

hi,
I am getting following error in MIRO transaction ....Can anybody please fix this ?
"In company code 3000, the number range 51 is missing for the year 2008"
Regards
Vijay

HI,
Please check the nuber ranges whether that has been selected as external for the Invoicing.
If external then please check whether the said no range starting from 51 is included in the external no assignment or no?
If not then yiu may have to add the same no range and then check.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Prasanna
Award pls if helpful.

Error In MIRO GL account allows only output tax

Hello All,
We are facing an error in MIRO that GL account xxxxx allows only out put tax. The scinario & settings are as below.
FB60
There is no error when using the particular tax code sytem posts the document
MIRO
Same vendor & tax code used as in FB60
The systemshows an error that GL ***** allows only output tax.
TAX CODE settings in FTXP
The GL showing error is in tax code
GL settings
In GL master data in control tab , the tax category is defined as out put tax
QUERY
Why in FB60 it allows the GL & not in MIRO ( Both are vendor invoice and suppose to work in similar manner)
please note in both the cases the entries are same
Vendor Cr
Expense / Stock Dr
VAT GL **** Cr
VAT GL-2 Dr
VAT GL**** is not picking @ MIRO & Picks @ FB60 with out any error
Any Idea !!!
Thanks & Regards
Arun R

Hi,
The problem is resolved .
The error was due to the fact that the VAT was an aquisiton tax for europe.
The details are in note 373587
Thanks for the support
Regards
Arun

CO OBJECT ERROR IN MIRO FOR UNPLANNED DEL COST

Dear Friends
I m facing one error in MIRO can u guide me in that context.
well in MIRO i m postin Unplanned deliver cost.......and it is asking me assignment to this G/L for Cost center object..
ERROR: Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object
..I have already assigned the Cost center for the G/l in OKB9 is there anything else has to be done
Actually we have 4 plants and 4 Business area i.e whenever i am doing any posting for BW01 -and Business Area BA01 My cost center BW01402 will get hit similarly for other plant and Business are Cost center has been assigned in OKB9 in Details per business Area,is it the right method or anything else has to be done.
Actually in OKB9 i have maintained that GL and in Detail per business area i have maintained cost center per business area
we have assigned the right Cost senter only i.e for different Plant and differenct business area we have asigned different cost center.
Then y i m getting error i m not understanding..
Please guide me in this context.
Also i am trying other method of posting Freight (unplanned delviery cost ) as well as labour charge through ACTIVATING -"Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts"
So that for particular G/L I can Debt or credit that account,in which will doing MIRO G/L Tab gets activated ,i m entering G/L and entering amount for freight and Labor is this the correct procedure.
Regards
shailesh

I have already assigned this G/L as primary cost element in FS00 and in OKB9 also Cost center is assigned as per Business Area as mentioned in the thread
i.e we have 4 plants and 4 business area so we assigned 4 cost centers to 4 business area, so whenver i m postin unplanned delivery cost for a particular plant then my GL should hit with proper cost center but still it is asking for CO OBJECT
ERROR IS:
"Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object"
If i maintained the default Cost center in FS00 in cost element then it doesnt give error but my requirement is that for a particular plant ,and business are only cost area assigned to it should hit
Any other solutions.
Thankz and regards
Shailesh

Error: System not configured as Integration Engine

Hi ,
I was trying to simulate the following scenario in SAP XI:
HTTP--> SAP XI --> (RFC/BAPI)SAP R/3
Let me clear what i did.
I have to call a BAPI using RFC adapter in XI to display some information on a request of some Http app.
1. I have Imported the RFC BAPI into IR.
2. I have created the XSD files for http Re and res messages.
3. I have created the XSLT mapping programs and put them in a zip file and imported into IR.
4. I have created a Interface mapping and assign the created messages and mapping programs.
5. In ID i have created a Business service for my web application.
6. Receiver determination created in Id and Interface determination and receiver agreement in ID and activated the changes.
7. I have tested the same by sending the request from my web application to xi plain http adapter as follows:
http://grserver:8000/sap/xi/adapter_plain?bs=XIWS_web&namespace=urn%3Axi%3Asap%3Awebapp&interface=HTTP_out&qos=BE
and in the result i have got the following error:
"System not configured as Integration Engine"
but i have tried it many times and some times it gives me correct results but after that the same error ios coming.
so can you tell me what could be wrong in the configuration of XI of what is the solution for this problem.
Reagrds
Gopesh Kumar Agarwal

Hi,
What is the version of XI you are using? If u are usign XI2.0, ur URL is correct. But if you are using XI3.0 then use service=<SENDERSERVICE>instead of
bs=<SENDERSERVICE> parameter in your URL.
bs is replaced by service in XI3.0
Your URL will be http://grserver:8000/sap/xi/adapter_plain?service=XIWS_web&namespace=urn%3Axi%3Asap%3Awebapp&interface=HTTP_out&qos=BE
Hope this helps you.
Cheers,
Siva Maranani.
Message was edited by: siva maranani
Message was edited by: siva maranani

Message 8I 478 error at MIRO

Hi Experts,
We are facing a very strange problem with the message control 8I 478 as an error at MIRO with different behavior in different servers.
In dev the same scenario with same message control the message is not triggering and taxes also calculating but in PRD the message is coming error.
Scenario:
PO-Dealer scenario--qty 100
VL31N-100 qty
J1IEX_C with MRP indicator for 100 qty(Mat type raw material)
MIGO-90 qty
Then again with J1IEX_P part 2 posted for 90 qty.
doc status in tables J_1IGRXREF-posted,J_1IEXCDTL-in process,J_1IEXCHDR-in process.
Now at MIRO in Dev server taxes are getting calculated with proper tax code and part 2 posting not yet done error is not appearing(8I-478).
Same scenario in PRD at MIRO error part 2 posting not yet done is coming for 8I-478, message control are same in both the servers.
Kindly suggest.
Regards

If the issue is not happening in DEV, then ask your MM / FI consultant to compare both DEV and PRD. I feel, some MM/FI related setting is missing and hence the issue.
You may also have a look at the following OSS notes
Note 1535398 - 8I478 error when invoice is posted for service PO in MIRO
Note 591587 - Message 8i478 appears even though Part II is posted
G. Lakshmipathi

Strange error in MIRO

Hi Experts,
I m facing a strange error in MIRO.
I have created a PO in Co code A100 for vendor XYZ.
The goods are received against this PO.
But when the accounts payable accountant tried to book the invoice, he selected the PO, but the strange thing happened is Vendor ABC appeared.
When I have created this PO for Vendor XYZ and done MIGO for this then why some different vendor ABC is appearing in MIR7 for the same PO.
Why is this happening? pls giude me in which areas I need to look to reach to the root of this problem.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
go4S

Hi Chandramohan, Mainpal
Thanks for valuable replies.
I have checked the Partner functions for both Vendors. Vendor ABC is not created as invoicing party for Vendor XYZ.
I have even checked the company code, MIR7 is done for the same Co code for which the PO is created.
Any more inputs will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
go4s

HP TouchSmart iq512sc error with windows 7 SoundMAX Integrated Digital HD Audio 5.1

Hello I have problems with my HP TouchSmart iq512sc error with windows 7 SoundMAX Integrated Digital HD Audio 5.1 surround sound receiver conete SPDIF after update from vista 64 bit to windows 7 began this problem
only nomal audio but no support from the surround sound of 5.1 channel SPDIF what the error may attend
I hope you can help me
Sincerely,
Steve

maybe your spdif default properties, in the supported format tab, options there are configured too high for your revceiver???
is there an error code on your receiver? if there is an error code check the troubleshooting section in the manual your receiver came with.
you could also try in windows media center, go to the tasks->settings and click windows media center setup->setup your speakers for 5.1 and hit the test button..
HP ENVY 17-j005tx Notebook, HP ENVY Recline 27-k001a, HP ProLiant MicroServer Gen8 G2020T, HP MediaSmart EX495 Server, HP MediaVault 2020, HP ENVY 120 AiO Printer

Error in MIRO: FF744

Hello Gurus-
We are receiving an error in MIRO 'Jurisdiction codes 1400000000 and 1800000000 have different cash discount base control'
In checking the forum, I found a similiar post and the solution to was to update OBCP but when I go to this transaction, there is nothing to update.
We are on ECC 6.0 and on Vertex.
Any insight will be greatly appreciated!

Hi,
Check if your customizing is correctly set in transactions
OB70, OBY6, OY01.
Also review F1 online help of field 'Discount base amount is the net
value' and notes 514938, 300253 and 872130.
Additionally, review following comments:
<1> if the flag of Activate Plants Abroad is activated, then
'Discount Base Net' in transaction OY01 for the concerned company code
must be ticked, otherwise, system will use gross amount as cash discount
base.
<2>if the flag of Activate Plants Abroad is not activated, then system
will read settings in OB70, if 'Disc Base Nt' flag is set, then system
will use net amount as "ash discount base".
See also note 882132.
I hope I could be of assistance.
Regards,
Fernando Evangelista

Dyncamics Connector Error CRM to NAV, no integration record within filter

In working to connect CRM Account records to the NAV Contact Card as Companies, experiencing an inner exception error that there is no integration record within the filter. Searching for a solution has not turned up a solid answer to path to resolution.
We are mapping basic data fields; address/city/state/zip/email/website/account name/account number/... The only required fields in NAV on the Contact Card are No and Name which we populate. The Account record from CRM does get created in NAV on
the Contact Card BUT updates within those data fields will not take and we get these errors (#1 & #2) in sequence. Error #3 below comes from an attempt at updating a field's data to sync from CRM Account to NAV after receiving errors
#1 & #2. It should be noted that the we are trying to send the Account record to Contact Card then to Customer Card. The Customer Card record is created without issue, but we believe error #3 may be fallout from the exception error #1.
1) WARNING TID:18 [2013-09-23T11:19:02.5269850-05:00]: [Account to NAV Contact Card] has encountered an error while processing key [[Test Company, 59057fb9-2cdb-e111-86eb-00155d006a06]]. Exception occurred in Microsoft Dynamics NAV
--- Exception Dump ---
Caught Exception: Exception occurred in Microsoft Dynamics NAV
Stack trace:
   at Microsoft.Dynamics.Integration.Adapters.Nav2009.NavObjectProvider.WriteObject(Object value)
   at Microsoft.Dynamics.Integration.Service.MapThread.ProcessReads()
Inner Exception: There is no Integration Record within the filter.
Filters: Record ID: Contact: 88888
Stack trace:
   at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol.ReadResponse(SoapClientMessage message, WebResponse response, Stream responseStream, Boolean asyncCall)
   at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol.Invoke(String methodName, Object[] parameters)
   at Microsoft.Dynamics.Integration.Adapters.Nav2009.NavIntegrationHelper.InvokeUpdateMethod(Object& newobj, Boolean create, String integrationId, Boolean updateIntegrationId)
   at Microsoft.Dynamics.Integration.Adapters.Nav2009.NavIntegrationHelper.DoUpdate(Object newobj, Object obj, String integrationId, Boolean create, Boolean hasExistingLines)
   at Microsoft.Dynamics.Integration.Adapters.Nav2009.NavIntegrationHelper.DoWrite(Object newobj)
   at Microsoft.Dynamics.Integration.Adapters.Nav2009.NavObjectProvider.WriteDynamicObject(Object value)
   at Microsoft.Dynamics.Integration.Adapters.Nav2009.NavObjectProvider.WriteObject(Object value)
2) [Account to NAV Contact Card] has encountered an error while processing key [[Test Company, 59057fb9-2cdb-e111-86eb-00155d006a06]]. The record already exists.
3) [Account to NAV Contact Card] has encountered an error while processing key [[Test Company, 59057fb9-2cdb-e111-86eb-00155d006a06]]. Table Id 18 of a supplied key does not match Table Id 5050 of the page 5050 source table.
Any direction to resolution would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Troy

May have isolated the cause to the Type field on the Contact Card in NAV not accepting a "Company" value as sent through the Connector. There are two values on the Contact Card for Type, Person/Company, where Person is accepted during send to create
an Integration Record but Company is not (even using it as the designed default doesn't work).
Has anyone experienced NAV not accepting the Type code of Company on the Contact Card through the Connector from CRM Accounts which in turn stops the creation of an Integration Record for the Account?
Any help or input would be very beneficial. Thanks.

Cost center error in miro

Hey experts... when the user is running miro .. he gets the error like cost element requires a co assignment(KI235)... we made a config for particular element in okb9 which is based on business area vise... but still its getting error in miro.. please help me solve the issue

hey dev thankss for the reply... i am posting three screenshots

Runtime error in MIRO posting invoice for SES's created in CATS

Hi Gurus,
We are having an issue when posting invoices in MIRO referred to SES created in CATS.
It always took much longer the system to process those SES created via CATS than those from the standard MM (ML81...) but the situation today is so critical that we can not pay the vendors for which SES are created via CATS. Runtime error is obtained when trying to post a SES for 900$ value.
This problem does not happen in our integrating/testing system.
Do you have any idea why this is happening?
thanks to everyone in advance,
VL

Hi,
have you searched for notes with the runtime error details?
Has also a short dump occured (transaction ST22) ? Please give more detail information.
Regards,
Edit

Error in MIRO for input tax calculation

HI Gurus,
We are facing problem at the time of logistic invoice verification in case of purchase orders with account assignments. Following is the set-up for executing MIRO:
1.     Purchase Order with (PO no. 4700000010)
1.1.     Account assignment category.
1.2.     Tax code.
2.     Goods Receipt MIGO
3.     Vendor Invoice booking MIRO
After doing about mentioned steps, document created at the MIGO step shows correct liability and Asset / Expense a/c.
At the time of vendor invoice verification (MIRO), system picks up only CST condition for vendor liability and non deductible excise conditions are reversed against the asset/expenses. For E.G.
1. PO created
Basic amount                   100.00
+ Basic Excise (16%)        16.00 (non-deductible)
+ Ecess             (02%)       00.32 (non-deductible)
+ Hcess             (01%)       00.16 (non-deductible)
+ CST                (03%)       03.49 (non-deductible)
                   119.97
2. MIGO Transaction
Asset / Expenses A/c -
Dr        119.97
To Prov. For Liability                          119.97
3. MIRO Transaction
Provision for Liability A/c -
Dr   119.97
To Vendor a/c.                                       103.97
To Asset / Expenses a/c                           16.00
(16.00 Basic excise duty)
At the time of MIRO, it should had posted
Provision for Liability A/c -
Dr   119.97
To Vendor a/c.                                       119.97
In case Pos without account assignment all accounting entry are posting correctly.
Kindly provide suitable solution ASAP.
Thanks in advance

Hi All,
Thank you for support. But my problem is not getting solved. Situation is as below
Entry is generated
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax     Dr.    25.50
Vendor          Cr. 101.25 (90% split on total amount)
Vendor          Cr.   11.25 (10% split on total amount)
Items are split based on installment payment term correctly. however since tax need to be paid immediately it should split like this:
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax     Dr.    25.50
Vendor          Cr. 115.50 (90% split of 100 GR/IR value + 25.5 of tax )
Vendor          Cr.   10 (10% split)
Then in OBY6 I enabled amount split. When I try to post invoice in MIRO with amount split I am getting error: Account assignment not completed for all required fields (PayT) Message no. F5A034. And in payment tab payment terms fields are missing. I have ticked 'Enable amount split' in OBY6. and have updated amount split tab.
How to do this in system?
Thanks,
Pushkar
Edited by: Pushkar Marathe on Sep 3, 2011 7:23 AM

Error In MIRO FI-MM integration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for