Error IW121 issued when create a maitenance order in IW31

Dear expert,
Error IW121 occured when I created a mainetance order in IW31.
IW121;Activity type XXX is not set up for cost center XXX in the year
02.07.2010.
Does anyone know how to deal with it?
Best regards

Do Consult your FICO Consultant, the link between cost Center and activity type has not been established. In Transaction KP26 you could establish the link as already stated above. Apart from this, If you do not want to create the link and still want to move forward with the Order, What you could do is :
Go To SPRO> Plant Maintenance and Customer Service> maintenance and Service Processing--> Message Control
Click on New Entries Button, Include the Message Application Area: IW Msg: 121 Enter the category as Warning or leave it blank so that the message does not bother you any more...
Regards...

Similar Messages

Error in GTS when creating a sales order

Hello All:
Let me first say that I have researched the forums and web for my answer to no avail...there is not a lot of information out there for GTS issues.
When creating a sales order in ECC 600; I am receiving errors...I have looked at SLG1 in order to get more information on these errors. I have validated my config in GQ0 and it appears to be correct. Here is my errors I am receiving:
Legal Control: Item Type Mapping not Maintained
Item Category: ZTAE
Item Category: ZTAQ
Legal Control: Partn. Function Mapping not Maintained
Partner Function: AG
Partner Function: AP
Partner Function: CI
Partner Function: EN
Partner Function: RE
Partner Function: RG
Partner Function: SP
Partner Function: WE
Legal Control: Mapping of Org. Units not Maintained For Fore
Company Code: 1000
Legal Control: Mapping of Org. Units not Maintained For Lega
Plant: 1000
I have looked under the Org Structure for these errors and think my configuration is correct. I have checked under the following:
In SPRO I have done the following Config under Org Structure:
Define Foreign Trade Organizations
Assign Company Code At Feeder System
Define Legal Units
Assign Legal Unit to Foreigne Trade
Assigned Plant at Feeder System
In Spro I have done the following Config under Partner Structure:
Define Partner Functions
Define Groups of Partner Functions
Assign Partner Functions at Feeder system
In SpRO under Compliance Management I have done the following Config under document structure:
Define Doc Types
Assign Doc types at feeder system
Define item categories
Assign item categories at feeder system
It is obvious I am missing something....Please help...it would be greatly appreciated....

Hi Dave
Thanks for replying.
For Business Partners the error I am getting in SLG1 is the follwoing:
Sub Object text
Mapping of API to Customs Shipment - Arrival
Program
/SAPSLL/SAPLCORE_APPLOG_SERV
@5C\QError@
The system was unable to determine an FT organiz. for company code 1000
The system was unable to determine a legal unit for plant 1000
No mapping information exists for partner function AG
Another error for Business Partner:
sub object text
Business Partner Distribution
Program
/SAPSLL/SAPLCORE_APPLOG_SERV
@5C\QError@
Please use another function to maintain the SPACE version of the address
For Item Categories
SubObect TextMapping of API to Customs Shipment - Arrival
Program
/SAPSLL/SAPLCORE_APPLOG_SERV
@5C\QError@
No mapping information exists for item type ZTAQ
The system was unable to determine a legal unit for plant 1000
No mapping information exists for partner function AG
Also we are using GTS 7.2 but upgrading to GTS 10 and I am trying to create our testing client for a to test after upgrade
Edited by: Kim Blair on Sep 9, 2011 4:57 PM
Edited by: Kim Blair on Sep 9, 2011 4:58 PM

Error V2 005 when creating a sales order from a quotation

I hope someone can come up with some ideas to help me with this error. My client is creating a sales order from a quotation and immediately on the first screen the error V2 005 pops up. The quotation was not created with reference to any previous document, and at this point not sold-to party has even been copied through to the sales order.
To make this error more interesting, this is only happening with 1 particular customer.
I have checked: credit management, customer hierarchies, material determination, customer info records and none of these are in use.
Can someone please come up with some ideas?
Thanks and regards
Kikas

Dear Sai,
Thanks for this note I am going to try it, however I have some concerns because the issue is only happening in production, with 1 custoemr only, and QA is an updated copy of production and I could not replicate the error in QA using the same customer....
If anyone has any other ideas please I would appreciate it
thanks
Kikas

IDoc Issues when creating a Sales Order in CRM System

Hi All,
We have a BSP application in place which allows the customers to create orders online. This BSP application is linked to R/3. The R/3 BSP application remotely calls a custom code in the CRM system which creates an IDOC for the CRM Order and the IDOC is processed and a CRM Order gets created. In the BSP page we have given a provision to the client to enter a Requested Delivery Date which is mapped to the delivery date in CRM system.
Now comes the problem. When the customer creates an order, he enters the requested delivery date but the order which is getting created is not being populated with the date entered in the screen but with the current date.
But when I try and reprocess the IDOC through WE19 without changing any IDOC data records the order gets created with the date which was entered in the webpage.
Any pointers regarding what is happening?
Regards,
Karthik

Hi Karthik,
Just check on the field date, this request delivery date in CRM.
Does it come from date profile? If it does, then try to remove the
date rule or any default value for this date.
Alternatively, I am afraid you have to separately save the date
after first IDOC document creation is done. Seems that the default
value taken place (and replaced) after the document has created.
Hope this helps.
Gun.

Movement type 262 when creating a work order (tx IW31)

Hi experts!!!!!
I need to cover the following scenario:
*sometimes, when the client carries out a work, they recover one item. Ideally they want to take into consideration this item as well from a point of view of costs, which means that in order to carry our the work some items and labour will be used and it will be considered as a cost but the item recovered will be considered as less cost (profit). In customizing (plant maitenance -->Maitenance and service orders --> General data -->define movement types for material reservations) that it is possible to customize the movement type to be used in case of reservations (goods issues and cancellation of goods issues). I have checked that if I change the customizing and I put 262 instead of 261, the system behaves as desired. The thing is that this affects to all the components and this is not correct. Therefore, from the work order (IW32 or IW31) I have tried to change the movement type manually, but I found that the field movement type (at component level for items L, field RESBD-BWART) is grey and it can not be changed.
Therefore, my question is:
*how to customize field RESBD-BWART so that I can change whenever I create or change a work order
*which is the meaning of having cancellation of goods issue in the customizing if then I only can use movement 261.
On the other hand, I have checked the functionality "refurbishment" but I doesn't fit because we have to use valuation type and this is not desired....
Best regards

Hi,
The materials that you are entering in the component tab are "Planned" materials that you may use during the execution of the order. In your case i don't see the necessity to enter it here, You could directly do a Return goods issue against the order using movement type 262, for that specific material.This should solve your needs.
Regards
Narasimhan

Issue when creating production order

Hi I encountered below error message when creating the production order:
error or warning occurrred during master data transfer,I had checked BOM and operation,all is ok (validty date),what's wrong?

Read the master data Once again IN production order
Thru Function --> read master data
If You get the error
Go to -- log --> read PP master data, You can find the error
Share The error message

Automatic creation of intercompany PO when creating a Sales Order

Hi Experts
Is there a standard way of triggering an intercompany PO when creating a sales order to the final customer (or the other way around, triggering a sales order to the end customer upon creation of an intercompany PO)? Scenario: business has setup a logistics company (company code X), which its purpose is to deliver goods to the final customer (home customers). However, sales orders are created from seperate chain of stores which belong to another company code (company code Y). This chain of stores have one sales organisation (since there is over 1000 stores under a chain). I need a way to represent that a sale originated from a store/plant belonging to company Y to end customer A. Also, I need a billing document (intercompany) from company code X to store/plant beloning to company Y.
Issues: in the intercompany config (assign intern customer numbers to sales org) - is there a way to assign a customer number at site/plant level so that when creating an intercompany billing it can be picked instead of the one assigned to the sales org and where can this be specified in the sales order (remember: in my scenario there are multiple stores/plants that belong to one sales organisation and it is not possible to use one customer number linked to the sales organisation.)
Desired results:
Sales order from store/plant YY belonging to company code Y to end customer A
Intercompany billing from plant XX belonging to company code X to store/plant YY
End customer billing from store/plant YY to end customer A
Thank you in advance for your help.

Hello Tsmash
I think you can acheive this with Regular Sales order + Inter Company STO combination.
Maintain customer numbers for each of the Plants from Company Y for the sales area belonging to Company X.
Then do the config for STO in MM using this menu path:
SPRO/Materials Management/Purchasing/Purchase Order/Set up Stock Transport Order
Here, in the activity 'Define Shipping Data for Plants', enter each of the plant-customers and the Sales area belonging to Comany code Y. Carry out other activities in this area appropriately.
Similarly set up Custom ( say Z1) Special Procurement type for Plant YY for stock transfer from XX using this menu path:
SPRO/Production/Material Requirements Planning/Master Data/Define Special Procurement Type:
Here maintain procurement type as F, Special procurement as U and plant as XX. You may need to repeat this config for each of the receiving plants (over 1000 stores under a chain) from co code Y.
In the material master MRP 2 for Plant YY, maintain procurement type as F and Special Procurement as Z1.
Sales order will be received under Co Code Y and sales area belonging to Y form customer A,
Because of the MRP config, a PO (STO) requirement will be raised on Co code X and plant XX. XX will send the goods to YY via a STO delivery using the Shipping data from 'Set up STO' config,
Plant YY will send the goods to A and bill that customer. Co Code X will raise an inter-comany bill on Co code Y.
That's how it should work. Try it and revert with any issues.

Performance issues when creating a Report / Query in Discoverer

Hi forum,
Hope you are can help, it involves a performance issues when creating a Report / Query.
I have a Discoverer Report that currently takes less than 5 seconds to run. After I add a condition to bring back Batch Status that = Posted we cancelled the query after reaching 20 minutes as this is way too long. If I remove the condition the query time goes back to less than 5 seconds.
Please see attached the SQL Inspector Plan:
Before Condition
SELECT STATEMENT
SORT GROUP BY
VIEW SYS
SORT GROUP BY
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
AND-EQUAL
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_N2
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_N1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_NORM_HIER_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_LINES
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_LINES_N1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_HEADERS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_DAILY_CONVERSION_TYPES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_BUDGET_VERSIONS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_ENCUMBRANCE_TYPES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_BATCHES
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_PERIODS
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_PERIODS_U1
After Condition
SELECT STATEMENT
SORT GROUP BY
VIEW SYS
SORT GROUP BY
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
TABLE ACCESS FULL GL.GL_JE_BATCHES
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_HEADERS
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_N1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_ENCUMBRANCE_TYPES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_DAILY_CONVERSION_TYPES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_BUDGET_VERSIONS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_LINES
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_LINES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_PERIODS
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_PERIODS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N1
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_NORM_HIER_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
Is there anything i can do in Discoverer Desktop / Administration to avoid this problem.
Many thanks,
Lance

Hi Rod,
I've tried the condition (Batch Status||'' = 'Posted') as you suggested, but the qeury time is still over 20 mins. To test i changed it to (Batch Status||'' = 'Unposted') and the query was returned within seconds again.
Ive been doing some more digging and have found the database view that is linked to the Journal Batches folder. See below.
I think the problem is with the column using DECODE. When querying the column in TOAD the value of P is returned. But in discoverer the condition is done on the value Posted. Im not too sure how DECODE works, but think this could be the causing some sort of issue with Full Table Scans. How do we get around this?
Lance
DECODE( JOURNAL_BATCH1.STATUS,
'+', 'Unable to validate or create CTA',
'+*', 'Was unable to validate or create CTA',
'-','Invalid or inactive rounding differences account in journal entry',
'-*', 'Modified invalid or inactive rounding differences account in journal entry',
'<', 'Showing sequence assignment failure',
'<*', 'Was showing sequence assignment failure',
'>', 'Showing cutoff rule violation',
'>*', 'Was showing cutoff rule violation',
'A', 'Journal batch failed funds reservation',
'A*', 'Journal batch previously failed funds reservation',
'AU', 'Showing batch with unopened period',
'B', 'Showing batch control total violation',
'B*', 'Was showing batch control total violation',
'BF', 'Showing batch with frozen or inactive budget',
'BU', 'Showing batch with unopened budget year',
'C', 'Showing unopened reporting period',
'C*', 'Was showing unopened reporting period',
'D', 'Selected for posting to an unopened period',
'D*', 'Was selected for posting to an unopened period',
'E', 'Showing no journal entries for this batch',
'E*', 'Was showing no journal entries for this batch',
'EU', 'Showing batch with unopened encumbrance year',
'F', 'Showing unopened reporting encumbrance year',
'F*', 'Was showing unopened reporting encumbrance year',
'G', 'Showing journal entry with invalid or inactive suspense account',
'G*', 'Was showing journal entry with invalid or inactive suspense account',
'H', 'Showing encumbrance journal entry with invalid or inactive reserve account',
'H*', 'Was showing encumbrance journal entry with invalid or inactive reserve account',
'I', 'In the process of being posted',
'J', 'Showing journal control total violation',
'J*', 'Was showing journal control total violation',
'K', 'Showing unbalanced intercompany journal entry',
'K*', 'Was showing unbalanced intercompany journal entry',
'L', 'Showing unbalanced journal entry by account category',
'L*', 'Was showing unbalanced journal entry by account category',
'M', 'Showing multiple problems preventing posting of batch',
'M*', 'Was showing multiple problems preventing posting of batch',
'N', 'Journal produced error during intercompany balance processing',
'N*', 'Journal produced error during intercompany balance processing',
'O', 'Unable to convert amounts into reporting currency',
'O*', 'Was unable to convert amounts into reporting currency',
'P', 'Posted',
'Q', 'Showing untaxed journal entry',
'Q*', 'Was showing untaxed journal entry',
'R', 'Showing unbalanced encumbrance entry without reserve account',
'R*', 'Was showing unbalanced encumbrance entry without reserve account',
'S', 'Already selected for posting',
'T', 'Showing invalid period and conversion information for this batch',
'T*', 'Was showing invalid period and conversion information for this batch',
'U', 'Unposted',
'V', 'Journal batch is unapproved',
'V*', 'Journal batch was unapproved',
'W', 'Showing an encumbrance journal entry with no encumbrance type',
'W*', 'Was showing an encumbrance journal entry with no encumbrance type',
'X', 'Showing an unbalanced journal entry but suspense not allowed',
'X*', 'Was showing an unbalanced journal entry but suspense not allowed',
'Z', 'Showing invalid journal entry lines or no journal entry lines',
'Z*', 'Was showing invalid journal entry lines or no journal entry lines', NULL ),

Sale Order Item Quantity Not Populating When Create A Sale Order Using BAPI

I am having a problem when creating a sale order using BAPI
BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2
Problem is that sale order item quantity field is not populating
code is as follows
ORDER_ITEMS_IN-ITM_NUMBER = '0010'.
ORDER_ITEMS_IN-MATERIAL = '000000000010000262'.
ORDER_ITEMS_IN-TARGET_QU = 'LB'.
ORDER_ITEMS_IN-TARGET_QTY = 1.

Hi,
Try populating ORDER_SCHEDULES_IN table in the bapi field REQ_QTY.
Regds,
Rudra

Attributes being removed when creating a Purchase Order

Hi,
We are running SRM 4.0 ECS.
I have an issue when creating a PO directly (BBP_POC).
When I have enter the item line information and then go details to enter a G/L account, the attributes UOM and Gross Price are removed. I need to go Back to Item overview to fill them in again. If I do it in Item detail in the Basic data tab, the attribute data keeps on being removed.
Does anyone know why this happens?
Message was edited by:
Anders Halmind
Message was edited by:
Anders Halmind

HI,
That means the PO print program is using some table (EKKO, EKPO,KONV and may be other for condition record) to get the value of the PO.
now those table get updated only after you save the PO.
That's the reason you are not getting any value in print preview before saving.

Retrieving sales order info instead of the offer when creating a prod order

Hi,
I cannot create a production order refering to a sales order if this sales order has been created in reference to an offer. This is standard SAP and the following message is displayed: "account assignment cannot be carried out because of different origine number".
Does anyone know how to retrieve the sales order information when creating a production order instead of retrieving the offer information? User-exit?
Thanks,
Ronan

No answer to this post

Is it possible to use variant configuration (with a Non-SAP solution) when creating ERP sales orders in SAP CRM WebUI

Hello,
our customer plans to use a Non-SAP solution for variant configuration (Camos) in SAP ERP (ECC 6.0) and in SAP CRM 7.0 EHP1 as well.
ERP sales orders (and ERP quotations) should be created in SAP CRM (CRM WebUI).
Is it possible to use variant configuration (with an external variant configuration tool) when creating ERP sales orders and quotations in the SAP CRM WebUI or do we have to implement SAP IPC for this?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
AEV

Dear AEV,
I think LORD (lean orders) should work with variant configuration as well. In the note 1236015 there is not restriction listed. However you need lord2 activated in ECC, and ECC system should be on EHP4.
Best regards
Rene

Is anyone else having Config error 16 issue when trying to start PSE 12 or Premier Elements after Mac upgrade to Yosemite 10.10 on iMac

Is anyone else having Config error 16 issue when trying to start PSE 12 or Premier Elements 12 after the Mac upgrade to OS X Yosemite 10.10 on iMac. I have had a number of issues with software and things after upgrading to OS X Yosemite 10.10 and even 10.10.1. I have uninstalled and reinstalled both PSE 12 and Premier Elements 12 a number of times and everything goes fine until its ready to launch and then you get an error message. Numerous uninstalled and reinstalls don't removing the problem. Strangely enough PSE 11 still appears to boot up and I never owned Premier Elements 11 so I don't know if it will start. I thought with Apple dropping its Apeture software and greater integration of iPhoto and Apeture files into Lightroom 5.7 all would be harmonious between these two players. Im not sure where Adobe wants us to go it recently removed the plugin to allow you to update files from LR to Adobe Revel, whats up with that. I now own two version of Adobe software that no longer work with my Mac and now way of uploading pictures from Lightroom to Revel. Needless to say I am pretty reluctant to sign on to a subscription of Creative Cloud with long term financial obligations when I can't even get my current Adobe software to work independently much less integrate with Lightroom. Frustrated with it all!

Get rid of 'put disks to sleep when possible' and you may see a dramatic improvement (not necessarily a cure).
That specific problem is a multiple-Processor (including graphics processor) problem, where one of the processors lost track of whether it should be responding to interrupts. You may have a Hardware problem.

User Exit to Create Production Order when creating of Purchase Order

Hi Guru's,
I want to create the Production Order when creating the Purchase Order. i want to know is there any user exit exists for that??
My scenario is as follows.
we are converting the Purchase Requisition to the Purchase Order , while doing this we want to create the Production Order.. Is this possible??
If possible how can we do that???Please suggest me the possible solution.
Thanks in advance.
Thank you,
Adi.

Teja,
My Scenario is as follows.
P1- Manufacturing Plant
P2 - WareHouse Plant (Procures Material from P1 using STO)
When we run the MRP in P2, it creates a Purchase Requisition, that Purc.Req is going to be convert as STO (Stock Transport Order) in P1 Plant.
When converting the Purchase Req to STO, we need to create a Production Order in P1 Plant.
we know that system will creae the Purchase Order only, is there any possibility that,For creating the Production Order is there any user Exit/BADI or any other procedure while creating the Purchase Order????
Thanks,
Adi.

An error has occurred when creating this editor

I had created a View in a WDC project which I had also deployed and run successfully in GP several times. Once I closed and opened NetWeaver Developer Studio, and tried to open this View again I get an error saying 'An error has occurred when creating this editor'. Please let me know what could be the reason.
Anil

I also faced with this problem several times but without fatal consequences. To be sure you can check the log in your workspace and paste it to the thread.
Also, try to close all the views and reopen the studio, usually it solves the problem.
Aliaksei

Error IW121 issued when create a maitenance order in IW31

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for