Error "max number in fi reached"?

Hi Friends,
Our scanario is sales order related production in MTO ,
when I try to backflush accotding to palned order,it gives me an error "max number in fi reached",
Sap gives suggestion for summarization FI document ,But i dont want to delete the material number.
because my business need information based on all consumed material(for request of auditors),
Thanks in advance for your attention,
Azam

Hi
FI documents have a limitation of having only 999 line items. Hence you would have to reduce the no of material line items in your process to fit this.
Hope this helps
Thanks
Anupam Murarka

Similar Messages

Summarization ( max number in fi reached)

Hi Gurus,
When i try to post goods issue in outbound delivery, it gives me an error max number in fi reached. then i customize for fi summarization. i made a customizing in OBYC work area VBRK and BSEG- MATNR.
But it still gives me the same error. Which work area do i have to customize in obyc?
PLease can you guide me ?

Now i get this error
Error in FI data compression
    Message no. F5843
Diagnosis
    The data in the FI document should be summarized via field ''. However,
    the system could not find this field in the internal structure (see
    'LFACIGEN').
System response
    This error stems from inconsistencies between the data base tables of
    the FI document and the internal summarization structure.
Procedure
    Start program 'SAPFACCG', in order to reset the internal structure, and
    then check whether field '' is in 'LFACIGEN'. enthalten ist.
I have checked and it is not empty. what can i do?

LDAP "ServerListener" stops responding (Max number of connections reached)

Hi --
The last four work days, in the evening, our OAS 10G server stopped processing portal logon requests. The response to login requests was this message:
Internal error WWC-00006 Unexpected error
encountered in wwsec_app_priv.process)signon
(User-Defined Exception) (WWC-41417)
An exception was raised when accessing the
Oracle Internet Directory 81: Can't contact
LDAP server. Details:
Operation dbms_ldap.simple_bind_s (The message also included other details such as the host, port and DN, and a reference to error message WWC-41743.)
Suspecting an LDAP problem, we looked on the server, and in ORACLE_HOME/LDAP/LOG I found recent log files (oidldapd[instance]s[pid].log) with several megs of messages that look like this:
2005/06/17:17:59:33 * ServerListener :2 * ERROR :
ServerListener : Max numbers of connections reached.
Num Conns = 874, Max Conns = 874, Closing the
connection. These messages repeated, several times per minute, overnight and the next day until I restarted the server. The same thing happened again the next night.
A metalink search pointed to docid "293391.1" which, in part, suggests that the problem may be caused by improper programming, and that the solution may be to, "investigate the applications that connect to OID and where possible modify them to perform an explicit disconnect."
Does anyone have any reference to how an application can perform an explicit disconnect from the OID? We do have a relatively new application which follows the "Java API for Oracle Internet Directory" -- documention found here: http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/network.920/a96577/oid_java.htm -- but in that document we cannot find any reference for how to "perform an explicit disconnect".
The application already calls the "context.close()" method, which according to the documentation closes the connection to the OID, but we cannot find any other "explicit disconnect". And, since the problem happens even though our app is already calling the context.close(), there must be something else.
Opened this up as a Metalink question related to Portal, but they said it's not their problem, and we should ask over here.
Any thoughts?

Looks like that's helped. While the errors persist, OID isn't dieing.
For anyone with similar problems, it looks like docid 437493.1 is useful. Upgrade clients to at least 10.2.0.3 to defeat a sqlnet problem.
Just tried it with the 10.2.0.5 patchset and it seems to be working and not generating the 104 error on the OID server.

BDC error :Maximum number of sessions reached

Hi!
I have created a BDC program which outputs the available Orders / delivberies for a particular plant with checakboxes to select each lines or multiple selection. On selecting one opr more line from output and clicking a GENERATE button on the output screen the bdc calls in VF01 transaction and subsequently the billing documenst are automatically generated and sent to the printer directly.
The problem: The problem happend when more than 6 documents are selected or if the selected no. of items are more than the screens opened in any enviornment where we are running , it gives an error message that "maximum number of sessiosn reached" . This creates aproblem is knowing which documenst or how many invoices have already printed and which ones did not.
I was wondering if there is nay other way of stopping this problem of miximum number sessions recahed. I mean if there is anyway we can eliminate each processesed session so that it does not have to create so many screens even if more documents are selected.
Thanks

I have the sales document number that I am using to create the billing document. I am not prety sure where to use it. I ahve set the parameter ID AUN alread6.
refresh: bdc_tab.
perform update_bdc using: 'X' 'SAPMV60A'    '0102',
                            ' ' 'BDC_CURSOR' 'RV60A-FKART',
                            ' ' 'RV60A-FKART' lc_fkart,
                            ' ' 'BDC_OKCODE' '/00'.
loop at it_vbeln into wa_vbeln.
    ln_index = sy-tabix.
*   Up to the second delivery of the BDC add the Delivery to the screen,
*   after that click the More Documents for every entry. logic changed for DEVK902353
*   changed again in added for every line DEVK910604
    case ln_index.
      when 1.
        concatenate 'KOMFK-VBELN' '(' ln_index ')' into lc_field.
        if li_lines = 1.
          perform update_bdc using: ' ' lc_field wa_vbeln.
        else.
          perform update_bdc using: ' ' lc_field wa_vbeln,
                                    ' ' 'BDC_OKCODE' 'FKAN'.
        endif.
      when others.
        if p_rdos = 'X'.
          concatenate 'KOMFK-VBELN' '(2)' into lc_field.
          perform update_bdc using: ' ' lc_field wa_vbeln,
                                    'X' 'SAPMV60A'   '0102',
                                    ' ' 'RV60A-FKDAT' lc_date,
                                    ' ' 'BDC_OKCODE' 'FKAN'.
        else.
          concatenate 'KOMFK-VBELN' '(2)' into lc_field.
          perform update_bdc using: ' ' lc_field wa_vbeln,
                                    'X' 'SAPMV60A'   '0102',
                                    ' ' 'BDC_OKCODE' 'FKAN'.
        endif.
    endcase.
endloop.
* VF01 will go to a different screen if only one line selected
if li_lines eq 1.
    perform update_bdc using: 'X' 'SAPMV60A' '0104',
                              ' ' 'BDC_OKCODE' '=SICH'.
else.
    perform update_bdc using: 'X' 'SAPMV60A' '0102',
                              ' ' 'BDC_OKCODE' '=SICH'.
endif.
{color:green}call transaction 'VF01' using bdc_tab options from lwa_bdcoptions
                           messages into it_bdcmess .{color}
write: / 'BDC Messages:'.
skip.

LSO Booking Error - Maximum number of Participants reached;

Hi Experts,
Our Client is implementing LSO. We had installed Enhancement Pack 4 into the development system.
We are currently facing a Problem relating to the LSO.
When I am trying to book a participant on to the Course (E) via LSO_PSV1 or LSO_PV00, I am getting the following warning but able to book the person on to the Course.
Warning:Maximum number of Participants reached; proceed with waiting list.
But if I try to do the booking using PSV1 (which is TEM transaction) i am able to book the particpant on to the Course I am not getting any warning and the particpant was booked successfully.
I had assigned a Location to the Course Type (D) related to the Course (E) with Minimum Capacity (10), Optimum Capacity (15) and Maximum Capacity (20).
Also to the Course I had provided the same capacity that is there for the Location.
Because of the warning above we are not able to book any Courses from the Portal.
Did anybody face this kind of issue before?
Please provide your expertise on this.

Hi,
No. We had not assigned the Capacity anywhere other than at the Course Type and Course Level.
I tried one Scenario.
I removed my employee assigned and tried to book on the Course as a User (US). I am able to book without any warning message.
Please let me know if there is any Config that we would have missed.
Thanks and Regards,
Nagendra

Error 'Maximum number of sessions reached' while posting an idoc

Hi,
i got one requirement that when ever user enters so many materials with different quantities and version id's and when he executes,it has to post the idocs using FM .but if the number of records increases,iam getting error that 'maximum number of internal sessions exceeded' how can i avoid this for successfful posting.To avoid this i called the FM in background .If i call the FM in background it is not at all posting even one idoc also.Can anybody please help on this .
Thanks & Regards
Roopa

Hi,
i got one requirement that when ever user enters so many materials with different quantities and version id's and when he executes,it has to post the idocs using FM .but if the number of records increases,iam getting error that 'maximum number of internal sessions exceeded' how can i avoid this for successfful posting.To avoid this i called the FM in background .If i call the FM in background it is not at all posting even one idoc also.Can anybody please help on this .
Thanks & Regards
Roopa

Error when number of instances reach 113

we tested sending data to WLI from Enterprise Server. As soon as the # of instances
increase to more than 113, the WLI does not send the XML document to Enterprise
Server. As soon as we delete the instances from the WLI for that user it starts
working until again it reach to 113 instances.

Thank you for your help. I am very new here.
The form collecting the address is on my shopping cart and is working fine, I ran the test code you provided.
The data from the form is then inserted into a database.
intodb.cfm
INSERT INTO people(firstname,lastname,email,address,city,state,country,zip,phone,shipfirst,shiplast,s hipaddress,shipcity,shipstate,shipzip,shipcountry,lastfour,frequency,cases,ccmo,ccyr,cctyp e,dater,cfid,cftoken)
VALUES('#shipfirst#','#shiplast#','#email_addr#','#shipaddress#','#shipcity#','#shipstate# ','#shipcountry#','#shipzip#','#phone#','#shipfirst#','#shiplast#','#shipaddress#','#shipc ity#','#shipstate#','#shipzip#','#shipcountry#','#lastfour#','#frequency#','#cases#','#ccm o#','#ccyr#','#cctype#','#DateFormat("#Now()#", "yyyy-mm-dd")# #TimeFormat("#Now()#", "hh:mm:sstt")#','#session.cfid#','#session.cftoken#')
<cflocation url="sale2.cfm?shipmethod=#shipmethod#&shipcost=#shipcost#&shipfirst=#shipfirst#&shiplast =#shiplast#&shipaddress=#shipaddress#&shipcity=#shipcity#&shipstate=#shipstate#&shipzip=#s hipzip#&shipcountry=#shipcountry#&country=#shipcountry#&phone=#phone#&email_addr=#email_ad dr#&ccnum=#ccnum#&ccmo=#ccmo#&ccyr=#ccyr#&cctype=#cctype#&ordertotal=#ordertotal#&disc=#di sc#">
Then on sale2.cfm.
<cfsavecontent variable="strXML">
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<SaleRequest>
<CustomerData>
<Email>#email_addr#</Email>
<BillingAddress>
<Address1>#shipaddress#</Address1>
<FirstName>#shipfirst#</FirstName>
<LastName>#shiplast#</LastName>
<City>#shipcity#</City>
<State>#shipstate#</State>
<Zip>#shipzip#</Zip>
<Country>#shipcountry#</Country>
<Phone>#phone#</Phone>
</BillingAddress>
I receive this error, assuming it is the EMAIL_ADDR variable because it is the first one:
Variable EMAIL_ADDR is undefined.

Maximum number of items reached in FI

Hi,
How to avoid the situation(error)
Po raised for some 300 line items.
PO consists of 3-4 header conditions and all the conditions are linked to a differrent GL account all together.
GR to be done against PO.
System fails to post the document because of the error 'max no of items reached in FI(since counter limit for accounting document lines is 999).
This is most likey to happen frequently in my requirement since the POs are often consisting of 200-300 line items and alsmost 2-3 conditions minimum.
In addition to that we have thought of going for purchase account management which means that effectively 2 more additional postings in GR.
So all in all for every line in PO there could be atleast 6-8 accounting entries getting generated at the time of MIGO or any goods movement.
This very commonly happens in Sales issues also and in Invoicng also.
I have raised this issue earlier also but could not got any concrete answer.
Many suggested to go in for split GR but how far that is advicable.
There is summerization option but I am really not getting any que out of some notes I read and some forum postings I read.
Can anyone suggest me a simple step by step approach for achieving this and basically how it works and would be helpful for me.
I repeat and request you all to help me in this.If someone has already done this then please share the knowledge.
Regards,
arjman

Hi
Please check OSS note 36353. This is based on summarization/deletion of certain information like material number in FI documents, which will not impact other modules.
Hope this is useful
S Jayaram

Maximum number of items reached in FI--help required please

Hi,
How to avoid the situation(error)
Po raised for some 300 line items.
PO consists of 3-4 header conditions and all the conditions are linked to a differrent GL account all together.
GR to be done against PO.
System fails to post the document because of the error 'max no of items reached in FI(since counter limit for accounting document lines is 999).
This is most likey to happen frequently in my requirement since the POs are often consisting of 200-300 line items and alsmost 2-3 conditions minimum.
In addition to that we have thought of going for purchase account management which means that effectively 2 more additional postings in GR.
So all in all for every line in PO there could be atleast 6-8 accounting entries getting generated at the time of MIGO or any goods movement.
This very commonly happens in Sales issues also and in Invoicng also.
I have raised this issue earlier also but could not got any concrete answer.
Many suggested to go in for split GR but how far that is advicable.
There is summerization option but I am really not getting any que out of some notes I read and some forum postings I read.
Can anyone suggest me a simple step by step approach for achieving this and basically how it works and would be helpful for me.
I repeat and request you all to help me in this.If someone has already done this then please share the knowledge.
Regards,
arjman

Hi,
The issue what you mentioned is really a very painful and most complex one which we are also researching. OSS suggested a OSS note and it didn't work. Yes, as you said, we have that issue in MIRO for now....I am afraid, it would comeup in MIGO as well, then, I will have no sleep, for sure....suprizingly, OSS is working very slow on this issue to my surprize. The OSS note doesn't clearly specify what to and how to summarize. We have different issues in MIRO....one for number of tax lines exceeding 500 lines...and GR/IR lines exceeding on another end...we thought if we can't fix tax lines, at least we can work on GR/IR lines but neither one is successful....We have this issue in ECC 5 for the past 3 months...with real good expert in each functional space in the team, we couldn't fix it yet!!!
just FYI

Max Number of items for an FI document (999) has been exceded

Dear Guru's
I hav production Bom For A ( Truck) , and now when i declare the production it gives me an ERROR :-
Max Number of items for an FI document (999) has been exceded.
How i can overcome this error!!
Please help
Regards
Rahul Bhardwaj

Hi
You cant post more than 999 line items in FI document and you need to split the document if line items crosses 999. It looks your production BOM itself contains some errors. Check it. Becoz no production BOM contains such a huge materials. Splitting the BOM into sub BOM may be another option.
Srinivas

SRM 5.00 web Maximum number of sessions reached

hello
it seems a problem very simple anyway i don't know how to resolve it.
the error "Maximum number of sessions reached" occurs in the ITS of SRM 5.00 using the web.
It happens on all transactionsn anyway it works properly in abap gui but not in webgui.
If I go in all transactions and i try to open another mode the popup appears with the error descrpted.
the session with that user are very few ...anyway the number of sessions is smaller than the parameter limit set in rdisp/max_alt_modes
Do you have any idea?
thanks
Nick

Hello Nick,
Nicola Blasi wrote:
If I go in all transactions and i try to open another mode the popup appears with the error descrpted.
I do not understand what you mean by "all transactions" and "open another mode". Where do you open it? You can not open another mode from the SAP GUI for HTML (Webgui) itself, since this is not supported. You will need to start a new session.
Best regards,
TJ

Max Number Errors Reached but all components were successful

Hello All,<o:p></o:p>
I have a package in which I have an Execute Package Task that in turn controls a bunch of other packages. I have one (I have disabled all but
a couple others) where the entirety of the package appears to run successfully (all green) but the Execute Package Task itself is failing with the error "Warning:
SSIS Warning Code DTS_W_MAXIMUMERRORCOUNTREACHED. The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (3) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure.
This occurs when the number of errors reaches the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors." <o:p></o:p>
I increased the Max number of errors on the Execute Project Task "Load ARZ Demographics to Stage" to 100 but I still get the same error
-- Apparently, the max number it's seeing (1) is not on this task but I also changed the numbers of the package that this task calls. I am flummoxed as to where SSIS is seeing that the limit of 1 is set.
Thanks kindly,
Mike

Hello All,<o:p></o:p>
I have a package in which I have an Execute Package Task that in turn controls a bunch of other packages. I have one (I have disabled all but
a couple others) where the entirety of the package appears to run successfully (all green) but the Execute Package Task itself is failing with the error "Warning:
SSIS Warning Code DTS_W_MAXIMUMERRORCOUNTREACHED. The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (3) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure.
This occurs when the number of errors reaches the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors." <o:p></o:p>
I increased the Max number of errors on the Execute Project Task "Load ARZ Demographics to Stage" to 100 but I still get the same error -- Apparently,
the max number it's seeing (1) is not on this task but I also changed the numbers of the package that this task calls. I am flummoxed as to where SSIS is seeing that the limit of 1 is set.
Thanks kindly,
Mike
before this error there might be some warning messages posted in execution results page. Please post that. or else message with red mark (error msg) will be posted.
- please mark correct answers

Error Max no of items in FI reached during CJ88

Hi All, We are getting a similar error as above in cj88 error no F5727. The number of Fixed Assets defined in Level 1 WBS is 964. This is less than 999 so dont understand why this issue is coming. I find two other discussions in this forum: First we can use another secondary WBS to post all the cost which is not possible here as we define all fixed assets only in level 1 wbs Second we found the note 36353 is this going to help? Third we can settle cost to one single WBS only rather than all these and then transfer cost or distribute to all FXA through Asset posting. But this is also not possible as how to change the settlement rule now. All these line items are already used in previous period 12/2014 and there are no unsettled balances of previous period. Then how to remove this error? Can anybody suggest.

Hi,
Read this thread
You are not yet reached to 999 levels still it is giving an error message, strange. Can you check the settlemen rules at table level does it have more than what you see on the settlement screen. if that is the case then you delete unwanted netries from table COBRB and COBRA by using SM30.
Message no. F5727:maximum number of items reached in FI sereen MI07.
Maximum number of items in FI reached - CJ88
follow the work around suggested by Virendra. Hope that will solve your issue. if not raise OSS to SAP.
Thanks,
Sudhakar

Error "Maximum number of items in FI reached"

Hi All,
We are getting error "Maximum number of items in FI reached", if there are more than 999 items. We have found an SAP note "Note 36353 - AC interface: Summarizing FI documents".
This note seems to do more with customizing & doesnt need any code changes.
Our system is of release 4.6C, My concern is that, in the note it has been mentioned in the correction instruction 1258 that for release 4.6C the Valid Support Package is 46C-ALL SUPP. PACKAGES.
If this support package is not available in the system does this SAP note work. I mean is this the prerequisite.
Kindly suggest if this is the correct note as well.
Thanks & Regards
Abhii

Hi Abhii,
Please see following threads..
Re: Maximum number of items in FI reached
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=301319
Hope this helps...
Best Regards,
Archana

A/c Error 'Maximum number of item in FI reached' during invoice posting

Invoice is created with multiple Delevery So no.of entriies has increased and accounting document has not been created due to error 'Maximum number of item in FI reached'.
Accounting document not generated. How it be solved.
Regards,
Sohail

dear
maximum number of accounting line items is 999.
if the total number of line items exceeds that value .. it would cause the error ....
speak to FI guy and abap guy ..may be it could be increased but as far as i know its not changeable.
you just need to reduce the items and processes in parts..
regards

Error "max number in fi reached"?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for